|
Grex > Coop13 > #103: I'm ejaculating on your tits. | |
|
| Author |
Message |
boltwitz
|
|
I'm ejaculating on your tits.
| 
Feb 2 23:20 UTC 2004 |
Staff has killed my witzbolt account and blocked at least one of my addresses
from telneting to Grex. As far as I can tell, this is because I entered "I'm
ejaculating on your tits" to a dozen or so items. While crude, that, I think,
should be allowed. And, in the past, it has been; several users, including
myself, have done similar things on larger scales and received no punishment
from staff.
|
| 30 responses total. |
boltwitz
|
|
response 1 of 30:
|
Feb 2 23:35 UTC 2004 |
It should be noted this is also a physical attack on my person(age). I used
to Grex with a bigfatfonted console. However, that doesn't work very well
with the system I'm connected through right now. Instead, I have to use a
tinyfonted xterm, which hurts my eyes.
Grex is being used to assault people and its membership is doing nothing about
it.
Shame, Grex. Shame.
I'm ejaculating on your tits.
|
ryan
|
|
response 2 of 30:
|
Feb 3 00:07 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
boltwitz
|
|
response 3 of 30:
|
Feb 3 00:18 UTC 2004 |
I don't believe that would be sexual harassment, but I guess I'm not a lawyer.
I am, however, ejaculating on your tits.
|
jp2
|
|
response 4 of 30:
|
Feb 3 00:22 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
boltwitz
|
|
response 5 of 30:
|
Feb 3 00:24 UTC 2004 |
Thanks for the clarification, jp2!
I'm ejaculating on your tits.
|
naftee
|
|
response 6 of 30:
|
Feb 3 01:37 UTC 2004 |
It's sexual harassment if your tits aren't worth being ejaculated on!
|
naftee
|
|
response 7 of 30:
|
Feb 3 01:38 UTC 2004 |
Plus, I prefer "I'm spreading cum on your mamarry glands" .
|
anderyn
|
|
response 8 of 30:
|
Feb 3 02:12 UTC 2004 |
If you insist on being crude, you could at least spell it right.
I simply don't understand what is so interesting about saying that however
many times I just read it in agora and now in this item. It may be something
that excites you, but it's annoying and feels like harassment to this person
who is female and probably old enough to be your mother.
|
naftee
|
|
response 9 of 30:
|
Feb 3 02:24 UTC 2004 |
Yeah I butchered the spelling. You have a right to be insulted about that,
and I do apologise.
|
bhoward
|
|
response 10 of 30:
|
Feb 3 03:32 UTC 2004 |
For the record, the "witzbolt" account was disabled for abusive
use of the "tel" command.
|
boltwitz
|
|
response 11 of 30:
|
Feb 3 03:47 UTC 2004 |
Non-sense. The witzbolt account did not abuse the tel command.
|
scott
|
|
response 12 of 30:
|
Feb 3 04:05 UTC 2004 |
Grow up, polytarp.
|
boltwitz
|
|
response 13 of 30:
|
Feb 3 04:10 UTC 2004 |
Why don't you provide any evidence that the boltwitz account abused the tel
command? O, you can't? Why's that, scott? Oh, it's because Grex's staff
is NOT accountable to its members.
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 14 of 30:
|
Feb 3 06:17 UTC 2004 |
The circle jerk continues.
|
albaugh
|
|
response 15 of 30:
|
Feb 3 07:39 UTC 2004 |
By stomping on your stupidity, the grex staff *is* being accountable to its
members. Your mommie ain't in charge of grex, so quit yer whining.
|
russ
|
|
response 16 of 30:
|
Feb 3 12:56 UTC 2004 |
And this passes for wit in his circle.
It does make one wonder: is this just small-town ignorance and
insularity at work, or does something of this magnitude require
help from factors such as inbreeding?
|
gelinas
|
|
response 17 of 30:
|
Feb 3 13:04 UTC 2004 |
I have heard that the person behind this facade *can* be decent, and often
is. I do not know why he pretends otherwise here. I'd like to see him as
he really is.
|
scott
|
|
response 18 of 30:
|
Feb 3 13:40 UTC 2004 |
(I'm not staff...)
|
boltwitz
|
|
response 19 of 30:
|
Feb 3 13:51 UTC 2004 |
I know. That's why you can't provide any proof of your awful allegations;
staff won't explain its actions.
|
gull
|
|
response 20 of 30:
|
Feb 3 15:42 UTC 2004 |
Re resp:17: Because there's a particular group of mnetters that gets
their jollies by trying to screw things up on Grex. It's some kind of
petty rivalry I guess.
|
jp2
|
|
response 21 of 30:
|
Feb 3 16:07 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 22 of 30:
|
Feb 3 18:04 UTC 2004 |
polytarp/dah/willcome/etc
|
naftee
|
|
response 23 of 30:
|
Feb 4 16:25 UTC 2004 |
If the staff would let us read the writelog (no reason not to let us) then
we could tell instantly who is abusing the write command. Since it cannot
be done by guests, the guests must therefore reserve the right to assume staff
is lying when accusing users of abusing write and such tools.
|
gull
|
|
response 24 of 30:
|
Feb 6 15:32 UTC 2004 |
You really shouldn't be using any system where you don't feel you can
trust the superusers.
|