You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-31         
 
Author Message
russ
Grex terms of use should prohibit spam and crapfloods Mark Unseen   Feb 7 06:06 UTC 2002

Proposal:

Grex's terms of use should prohibit spamming and crapfloods, and set
fees for cleanup.

Purpose:  To discourage behavior such as polytarp's, and all other
spamming.  When someone like polytarp or angel21 comes in here, then
Grex could submit the bill to a collection agency.  If we ever get
any money, great!  If not, we've still done something to dog the vandals.
31 responses total.
steve
response 1 of 31: Mark Unseen   Feb 7 07:14 UTC 2002

   I agree it would be wonderful to be able to clean dreck like polytarp's
cruft out of existence, but it isn't going to work.  Not with Grex being
an open system.  To do what you propose, you'd destroy what we are.

   The more attention paid to twonks like him the better it gets for him.
Very much like throwing gas on a fire.

   I would like to strangle people like that at times, Russ.  I'd cheerfully
sick my six cats on them--after dunking him in tuna oil.  Unfortunately, we
can't.  ;-)
remmers
response 2 of 31: Mark Unseen   Feb 7 11:12 UTC 2002

I agree with STeve.  To implement this policy, we'd have to verify
every user, and get their name and address.  No more open newuser.
jmsaul
response 3 of 31: Mark Unseen   Feb 7 13:50 UTC 2002

Russ probably approves of that idea.

A technical fix might be better.  Is there any way to augment the "fix"
command so you can fix all responses by a given user?
aruba
response 4 of 31: Mark Unseen   Feb 7 14:26 UTC 2002

I agre with STeve and remmers.  Joe's idea sound like a good one, if someone
can implement it.
krj
response 5 of 31: Mark Unseen   Feb 7 15:51 UTC 2002

april21 is apparently going to be a regular visitor, there was a new 
ad from her in the music conference, item #74.
keesan
response 6 of 31: Mark Unseen   Feb 7 18:15 UTC 2002

And in several other conferences.  Would it help to delete the account?
glenda
response 7 of 31: Mark Unseen   Feb 7 18:50 UTC 2002

No it would not help to delete the account, s/he would just create a new one.
slynne
response 8 of 31: Mark Unseen   Feb 7 21:42 UTC 2002

You know, that twill stuff bugged me too but I got over it like 10 
minutes after I was done looking at the stuff. russ is probably going to 
stress himself into an early grave if he doesnt learn to let stuff go
other
response 9 of 31: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 00:20 UTC 2002

It's not in his constitution to let stuff go.
other
response 10 of 31: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 00:22 UTC 2002

By the way, and for the record, I agree that the only realistic solutions 
to this problem are either the existing or new technical ones, rather 
than policy ones.  <forget>, <pass> or some updated fix.
russ
response 11 of 31: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 04:41 UTC 2002

Re #3:  <jp2> Quit being a fuckwit asswipe. </jp2>

Re #2:  Not so.  The people doing this have no interest - and usually
no method - of hiding their tracks.  Spammers have to leave addresses
of some kind.  The only people who could hide are twits on dial-up.

Re #1:  Prevention would be nice, but it would be just as nice if a
few twonks wound up buying Grex a better Internet connection and some
new hardware.  Why should their stupidity cost them nothing?

Unfortunately, we can't take advantage of the pockets of idiots if
we don't have the appropriate policies in place.  Technical measures
are nice (I've got some very effective ones myself) but they only
benefit people who use Grex the way I do.  Being able to hand out
"speeding tickets" benefits the system as a whole.

Re #6:  And nobody's deleted them yet?  That's one place where a
fair-witness can save participants the bother of filtering.
gull
response 12 of 31: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 14:47 UTC 2002

I see no point in getting my shorts in a twist about this unless it 
becomes a recurring problem.
remmers
response 13 of 31: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 15:00 UTC 2002

Same here.  In over ten years of Agora, I can recall only one other
instance of spamming similar to the "twill" incident, and that was
about nine years ago.
steve
response 14 of 31: Mark Unseen   Feb 9 06:58 UTC 2002

   Russ, you know--I agree with you on the principle of twonk control.
Say a large Twonk magnet, and just scoop them up.

   But we can't do that.  And, worse, we can't bill them for our time
to clean up after them because we'd have to go to court over it.

   Sadly, there is an inexhustable supply of twonks around.  Dealing
with twonks puts them into an excited state and they start spewing
more ejecta as the excitement levels build.  Hmm--kind of like neon
atoms, aren't they?

   So, while I agree that they're a bother, direct fighting with them
isn't going to work.
jmsaul
response 15 of 31: Mark Unseen   Feb 10 04:18 UTC 2002

Re #11:  So you don't support verifying users?
russ
response 16 of 31: Mark Unseen   Feb 11 02:58 UTC 2002

Re #13:  I think we're going to see more things like angel21, though.
russ
response 17 of 31: Mark Unseen   Feb 12 01:50 UTC 2002

Re #15:  Not for Grex's purposes, no.

Re #14:  On the other hand, Steve, it might be worthwhile being able
to recover damages from an identifiable twonk.  I'm just saying that
Grex should have the policy foundations in place to seek recompense
should that occur.  It might help; it sure can't hurt.  (Do we have
to *sue* to recover monies due under the terms of use, or just bill?)

FYI, I counted 88 non-forgotten newresponse items on the session
with the "twill" nonsense (which I skipped using a modified twit
filter).  But suppose that someone was reading with Backtalk, and
did not have filtering available.  Further suppose that it took
10 seconds to click the "next" link and wait for each new page to
load.  That's 880 seconds, or almost 15 minutes of wasted time.

That's *per user*.  Multiply by probably some hundreds of users and
by some reasonable hourly rate for their time ($10.00 is sensible, but
for many $40.00 is not unreasonable) and we can get a figure of
several hundred to ~1000 dollars damages aggregated over the user base.  

Let's put that pain where it belongs.
jp2
response 18 of 31: Mark Unseen   Feb 12 01:53 UTC 2002

This response has been erased.

gull
response 19 of 31: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 00:16 UTC 2002

Re #17: In this context you're going to have to sue, even if you try to 
bill.  Think about it.  Unless the person was dumb enough to give 
newuser their real identity, finding out *who* to bill would require 
going to court to get the records of their ISP.  After that, if you 
bill them they'll almost certainly just ignore it.  Then you'd have to 
go to court to get them to actually pay.  Considering that it'd be hard 
to prove Grex had actually lost any money as a result of their actions, 
winning isn't a certain thing either.
jp2
response 20 of 31: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 02:32 UTC 2002

This response has been erased.

jaklumen
response 21 of 31: Mark Unseen   Feb 14 10:51 UTC 2002

resp:17  Yes, I use Backtalk.  No twit filter, sorry, unless one is 
built for us into the interface that we can toggle on/off.
remmers
response 22 of 31: Mark Unseen   Feb 14 11:36 UTC 2002

Backtalk does have a twit filter.  Go to the "Edit your personal
settings" page, then click on "Edit list of users to ignore".
steve
response 23 of 31: Mark Unseen   Feb 17 20:11 UTC 2002

   Russ, the problem I have with giving someone a bill for cleanup is
that the person who'd cause the need for the cleanup is exaqctly the
type to ignore it.  Without enforcement of some kind we'd never see
anything, and I fear we'd spend more time on twonk control policies
than Grex maintanence.
russ
response 24 of 31: Mark Unseen   Feb 18 22:36 UTC 2002

Re #23:  But that's the beauty of collection agencies, Steve!  We
just let someone else do it, and collection agencies are really
good at making nuisances of themselves.  If we can get details
like phone numbers and addresses from the ISP or school, that's
all we need.  (Getting the twonk cut off by the ISP or school is
another good threat, to help prevent repetition.)
 0-24   25-31         
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss