|
|
| Author |
Message |
polytarp
|
|
PARTY!
| 
May 16 01:15 UTC 2003 |
I have sent mail,
to the party admin,
with no avail.
O!, what a sin,
they doth do drive though my coffin a nail!
I want my own party channel named POLYTARP. Please make it, thanks.
|
| 17 responses total. |
naftee
|
|
response 1 of 17:
|
May 24 00:39 UTC 2003 |
DONHT BE GREEDY
|
polytarp
|
|
response 2 of 17:
|
May 24 03:02 UTC 2003 |
There are dozens of party channels. I don't know why I can't have one.
|
other
|
|
response 3 of 17:
|
May 24 03:20 UTC 2003 |
No reason I know of. If I remember correctly, private party channels are
available for the asking, as soon as partyadm or other staff get to it.
Has this changed?
|
polytarp
|
|
response 4 of 17:
|
May 24 15:19 UTC 2003 |
I've E_MAILED the partyadm, and NO_ONE responded! It would appear there IS
some reason.
|
other
|
|
response 5 of 17:
|
May 24 15:58 UTC 2003 |
partyadm is an alias for:
nephi
scott
ryan1
valerie
snow
beamer
Finger info for user beamer
Last login Sat Jan 26 15:36 2002 (EST)
Unread mail since Tue May 9 03:21:44 2000
Finger info for user snow
Last login Fri Jun 28 20:22 2002 (EST)
New mail received Sun Dec 1 20:29:52 2002;
unread since Fri Jun 28 20:24:53 2002
|
polytarp
|
|
response 6 of 17:
|
May 24 18:49 UTC 2003 |
Yeah. I sent the mail months ago.
|
other
|
|
response 7 of 17:
|
May 24 19:47 UTC 2003 |
I have posted a request in the staff conference that this request be
honored.
Please post the channel name and options you'd like. You can read the
man pages on party or enter :help in party to find out about the options
available. Posting your preferences here may facilitate a faster
response.
|
scott
|
|
response 8 of 17:
|
May 24 20:55 UTC 2003 |
It's not a conspiracy, just a general lack of getting things done. Plus
there's been very little partyadm stuff in the last copule years, so nobody
is in the habit of following up on chanels and such.
|
naftee
|
|
response 9 of 17:
|
May 25 17:37 UTC 2003 |
But party is still actively used. SHouldn't a request by an active user of
party be well taken? Why aren't there newer party admins?
|
jlamb
|
|
response 10 of 17:
|
May 25 23:54 UTC 2003 |
There does need to be some new partyadm people in my opinion.
|
polytarp
|
|
response 11 of 17:
|
May 26 00:50 UTC 2003 |
I vote for naftee, myself, and jlamb.
|
scott
|
|
response 12 of 17:
|
May 26 01:38 UTC 2003 |
Party is still used, but there isn't anywhere near the amount of channel and
noise activity that there used to be.
|
naftee
|
|
response 13 of 17:
|
May 26 19:50 UTC 2003 |
Exactly, because such media don't exist! It's true we need change. I support
polytarp's nominations.
|
polytarp
|
|
response 14 of 17:
|
May 26 19:51 UTC 2003 |
I, in turn, fully support naftee's support.
|
jlamb
|
|
response 15 of 17:
|
May 28 23:54 UTC 2003 |
Grex should give partyadm duties to TRUSTED individuals, while they are
selecting new staff members.
|
janc
|
|
response 16 of 17:
|
May 29 00:57 UTC 2003 |
Eric Bassey has expressed an interest in the job, in at least two places.
He seems mostly motivated by the failure of existing staff to take care
of creating this party channel.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 17 of 17:
|
Jun 5 12:49 UTC 2003 |
The requested channel has now been created.
|