|
|
| Author |
Message |
janc
|
|
Search Engines
|
Jun 6 18:41 UTC 2000 |
Currently Grex is configured in such a way to discourage search engines
from indexing our conferences. It seems to be working - I've turned up
any Grex Backtalk pages on any search engine.
Theoretically this could be changed. If I worked at it, I could
probably convince search engines like Google and Altavista to index the
Grex conferences. It is likely that I could convince them to index only
certain conferences - I could possibly even get the control down to the
level of indexing only selected items.
What I'm wondering would be if this is a good idea?
If we allowed indexing, people would feel that these forums are "less
private" and would be more reluctant to post personal information.
But if we want to attract lots of people into our conferencing system,
having the search engines index our conferences would be a great way to
do it - search for some subject, find Grexers discussing it, join in.
I don't know where I stand on this. I think making some conferences
searchable (like "coop") but not others might be worth discussing.
|
| 123 responses total. |
janc
|
|
response 1 of 123:
|
Jun 6 18:42 UTC 2000 |
Correction: "I've never turned up any Grex Backtalk pages on any search
engine."
|
remmers
|
|
response 2 of 123:
|
Jun 6 22:54 UTC 2000 |
I like the idea of making conferences searchable. Not only could it
attract new users, but it would be useful to established Grex users
such as myself in searching for old stuff.
|
other
|
|
response 3 of 123:
|
Jun 6 23:40 UTC 2000 |
What would be the impact on our net connection of the indexing process?
|
gypsi
|
|
response 4 of 123:
|
Jun 7 02:19 UTC 2000 |
I like this idea, especially when we have discussions regarding political
viewpoints or childbirth. Some of this information is wonderfully
informative.
|
krj
|
|
response 5 of 123:
|
Jun 7 02:25 UTC 2000 |
Of course, people who have posted personal information in years past
will be screwed, because it will come up in new searches.
|
cmcgee
|
|
response 6 of 123:
|
Jun 7 02:34 UTC 2000 |
Ick.
I think I may be against this. While I supported the anonymous reading from
the web, I'm not sure I would support indexing anything unless posters knew
from the start that their response might become searchable on the web. In
fact, part of my willingness to post on Grex has been premised on the idea
that no one could find my thoughts unless they found Grex first and also were
interested enough to join a conference.
Perhaps only indexing future Agoras? Or newly-started conferences? I'd be
willing to restart Small Business so that it could be indexed, but only if
there was a line on the entry screen that said that was being done.
|
scg
|
|
response 7 of 123:
|
Jun 7 03:44 UTC 2000 |
I supported anonymous reading too, but I don't support having the conferences
indexable by search engines. Once somebody has stumbled on Grex's
conferences, I'm happy to have them reading these items in context. I feel
very differently about having some random Grex item or set of Grex items be
what pops up on a search engine when somebody does a search for my name.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 8 of 123:
|
Jun 7 03:52 UTC 2000 |
I'm with the last three responders. I don't think this is a good thing to
do to people who entered stuff on the expectation that search engines can't
read it.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 9 of 123:
|
Jun 7 04:08 UTC 2000 |
I'm against the idea of indexing. I still get spammed from old usenet
postings; I don't need that from grex, too.
Not to mention that it violates the expectations: what's here is here and no
where else.
|
gypsi
|
|
response 10 of 123:
|
Jun 7 12:54 UTC 2000 |
There is a reason I use a pseudo in some items... That way nobody can
search by name or attribute it to me.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 11 of 123:
|
Jun 7 13:05 UTC 2000 |
Of course, not everyone has thought of that.
|
cmcgee
|
|
response 12 of 123:
|
Jun 7 16:14 UTC 2000 |
I'd REALLY be upset if the search could be by name or login. I've got enough
stalking problems without that added breech.
|
remmers
|
|
response 13 of 123:
|
Jun 7 16:15 UTC 2000 |
Technical question: With things as they are now set up, can we
prevent indexing by a sufficiently clever search engine?
|
aaron
|
|
response 14 of 123:
|
Jun 7 17:47 UTC 2000 |
More likely, the indexing would be made by a stupid search engine. The
clever ones will heed instructions found in a robots.txt file, or a
noindex command embedded on a page.
|
remmers
|
|
response 15 of 123:
|
Jun 7 17:53 UTC 2000 |
I meant "clever enough to ignore robots.txt and suchlike".
|
remmers
|
|
response 16 of 123:
|
Jun 7 18:27 UTC 2000 |
Anyway, my point was that that there has never been a guarantee
that Grex conferences won't get indexed, just a reasonable
supposition that the major search engines won't do so directly
because they are known to follow certain rules. I think it could
happen indirectly, though. Someone could create a "rogue mirror
site" of Grex, modified in such a way the things that prevent
indexing by major search engines are not present. Then the
mirror site would get indexed by the major search engines.
I realize that this might not be legal to do, but that does not
mean that it wouldn't happen.
So in discussing this issue, people should keep in mind that
the most Grex can do is influence the likelihood that people's
responses here will or will not become web-searchable; Grex
can't guarantee that they won't.
|
pfv
|
|
response 17 of 123:
|
Jun 7 18:42 UTC 2000 |
Sure they can: to be index and available means they have to
access 'em from the webside OR have a duplicate of the entire
system in another place.
Turn off the web, they can't reach it; enforce accounts, they
can't reach it; prosecute thieves, they won't copy it.
|
scg
|
|
response 18 of 123:
|
Jun 7 19:16 UTC 2000 |
Yes, I'm aware that such indexing may happen. I just don't think we should
do anything to encourage it.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 19 of 123:
|
Jun 7 19:51 UTC 2000 |
Re #10: doesn't work; even psuedonymous responses have our loginids recorded.
That's why I gave up on them after one test.
|
janc
|
|
response 20 of 123:
|
Jun 7 21:35 UTC 2000 |
The major search engines are well-behaved and obey our gentle requests
not to index the conferences.
But not all robots are that polite. I've never seen any search engine's
spider go through the Grex conferences, but I have seem email address
collectors do so. It does tend to be somewhat hard on the internet
connection when this happens, though the more legitimate spiders tend to
me more careful about this too.
I don't have a strong opinion either way. I guess I agree that it would
be appropriate to open only new material to indexing, not old material.
Another possiblity would be to allow "item list" pages (which show the
titles of all the items in a conference) to be indexed in some
conference, but not the actual items themselves.
|
davel
|
|
response 21 of 123:
|
Jun 8 01:33 UTC 2000 |
Re #19 re #10: I took her to mean that she created a pseudo account & used
that to respond on certain items. Certainly using the "pseudo" command to
at the respond-or-pass prompt is not anonymous, but I'd say most people use
it only to use the fullname field to say something. Possibly I'm wrong.
|
orinoco
|
|
response 22 of 123:
|
Jun 8 02:58 UTC 2000 |
resp:5 -- Jan suggests that it would be possible to limit which items a
search engine would be encouraged to inedex. Presumably that means that we
could continue discouraging them from indexing items entered before a certain
date, in order to protect people who entered stuff before the policy change.
That said, I still don't think that encouraging search engines would be a good
idea.
|
janc
|
|
response 23 of 123:
|
Jun 8 03:11 UTC 2000 |
I think by a judicious combination of mod_rewrite and writing custom
Backtalk scripts, it would be possible to implement just about any rules
you can think of for what is and is not allowable to index. I could
also set things up so that only a select list of search engines may
index things, or so different search engines are allowed to index
different things. Let your imaginations run wild.
|
gypsi
|
|
response 24 of 123:
|
Jun 8 14:44 UTC 2000 |
Re #21 - both my full name and cf pseudo are true pseudos. If people know
my login, oh well. They'll still see that "gypsi" belongs to "Groovy
Birdy". =) For a LONG time, I was using a completely different last name.
The only reason I changed it was because I know a lot of grexers in real
life now, and it gets confusing when they try to look me up or whatnot.
|