|
|
| Author |
Message |
eeyore
|
|
BOARD MEETING OF 3-1-00
|
Mar 11 05:36 UTC 2000 |
Sorry that this took so long to get posted, but I've been pretty busy, and
my brain was really fried the night of the meeting, so I had to pick up a
couple little bits that I missed. But I'm better now. :)
NOTES:
Meeting was called to order at 7:10 by Eric. All Board members were in
attendance, as well as Charles (arthurp), Steve (scg), Scott (scott), Mark
(aruba), & Mary (mary), with Valerie (valerie) and Arlo (arlo) appearing for
the grand finale.
Chair Report: Eric reported that he now realized that it was his duty to have
written adgendas at the meeting, and that at the next meeting he would
properly perform this duty.
Treasurer Report: Greg reported that we took in $675.40, and paid out
$468.30 in January, with 1 new member and 6 returning members. He has
found out that Card Services *had* recieved our check and application,
so we have been sent the stuff to accept cards. We had not yet heard
from Charge Solutions about taking cards on-line. Once we hear from
them, we need to find out how we go about taking cards on-line...if
the credit card numbers go through us or go onto a secure website.
(at the time of the writing, this is mostly settled, but hey, I just
print what went on at the meeting! :)
Publicity Committee: The major question was whether Misti was still working
on publicity. It seems that she said that she would now have more time
to work on it, and was then promptly removed from the baff mailing
list. Somebody (Eric?) was going to contact her and find out it she
was still interested.
Technical Comittee: We've recieved more donations of Memory. There is going
to be work on a development machine, so that we can test things without
having to take down Grex. We have the parts, we just need the time
to put it all together. It will be useful for checking drives and
for training. Charles has volunteered to become a trainee. All of
our hardware is working just fine at this point. Charles is willing
to donate a Pentium 66 plus the pieces for it to make a machine for
e-mail or to hold the password system. There is talk of setting up
a CGI webpage that could fix and sendout a new password without human
intervention. Disk space is tight right now, but hopefully we'll have
another disk in soon. The committee will at some point take Grex down
to format 2 more disks...one for extra space on Grex, one for the
developement machine.
Staff Meeting: The staff reports that Arlo is cute and walks up and down
hallways and spins rings.
New business: As of the meeting, Steve Gibbard was the contact person for
the domain name database, and he didn't want to be anymore. STeve
agreed to put in his name and work phone number, but asked for an
answering machine to put onto it, since this would be the Official
Phone. Jan motioned that we authorize up to $1.50 be spent by Steve
Andre on an answering machine for Grex. After a bit of laughter, he
fixed that amount to $50 (the amount that we had origionally decided
was a fair amount). John seconded the motion, and all voted yes. Also
the question of Inventory came up....namely, do we have a written
inventory anywhere? The answer, of course, was no, so the members of
the Technical Comittee agreed to meet afterwards and write down what
they could remember was in the Pumpkin. Mark mentioned that we do
need to keep track of this stuff, since we need to have a dollar amount
at the beginning and ending of each year for some of our paperwork.
It was pointed out that it would be hard to keep track of an inventory,
since parts seem to magically appear in the Pumpkin with nobody's
knowledge. STeve will post a list, and we need to keep a running
inventory, as we may have to pay Personal Property Tax on it. We also
need to fill out a Charitable Solicitations License 990, to accept
the donations of parts that we've always had. We also have several
computer parts laying around the Pumpkin that we have no use for, but
are still good. STeve has asked if we can donate them to the Open BSD
project. Board agreed, as long as it was local....no point in spending
the money to ship them.
Charle's phone rang....he took the call in the hallway.
Next meeting will be on April 5, 2000, at 7 p.m.
Meeting was adjurned at 8:12.
|
| 75 responses total. |
other
|
|
response 1 of 75:
|
Mar 12 01:55 UTC 2000 |
Misti said that as long as nobody else wants the position (for now, anyway)
she will remain chair of the publicity committee.
|
hhsrat
|
|
response 2 of 75:
|
Mar 12 03:27 UTC 2000 |
Before the answering machine is purchased, you might want to check with
Keesan to see if Kiwanis has a working one that might be cheaper than
going to a store.
|
eeyore
|
|
response 3 of 75:
|
Mar 12 03:33 UTC 2000 |
It was kind of hard for me to post just the minutes, and not all of the extra
information that I've recieved since the meeting...:)
|
swa
|
|
response 4 of 75:
|
Mar 12 05:23 UTC 2000 |
Such as?
|
pfv
|
|
response 5 of 75:
|
Mar 12 05:53 UTC 2000 |
I liked "the minutes" - made for a good-read.
|
swa
|
|
response 6 of 75:
|
Mar 12 06:05 UTC 2000 |
I was, BTW, particularly delighted with the staff report. ;)
|
spooked
|
|
response 7 of 75:
|
Mar 12 06:35 UTC 2000 |
Yep, I agree - it's just not fair I don't have the opportunity o attend
staff meetings! We need a web cam on Arlo (:
|
keesan
|
|
response 8 of 75:
|
Mar 12 16:35 UTC 2000 |
We have at least 30 working answering machines at Kiwanis. With a lifetime
guarantee - if it ever goes bad we replace it. Do you want digital, small
tape, large tape, one tape or two? Who wants to choose one?
|
mary
|
|
response 9 of 75:
|
Mar 12 20:01 UTC 2000 |
There was some small amount of discussion about getting a used
one, through Kiwanis. There didn't seem to be any support for
working with anything but a new and reliable machine. I know
you won't agree with that, Sindi, but even buying a new
inexpensive model didn't fly. STeve was told the decision
is his and he has up to $50 to spend.
I think that's a bit high, myself, but so it goes when you
have $5,000 in the bank.
I also think Board minutes should include discussions that
involve/mention people who aren't at the meetings. That
seems fair and right.
|
keesan
|
|
response 10 of 75:
|
Mar 12 20:51 UTC 2000 |
The new machines are made much more flimsily than the old ones. By the way,
what sort of very important calls are you expecting on this machine?
|
mdw
|
|
response 11 of 75:
|
Mar 12 22:21 UTC 2000 |
The secret service.
|
scg
|
|
response 12 of 75:
|
Mar 12 22:59 UTC 2000 |
And at one call every three or four months, it will probably take a long time
to notice if the machine breaks. That means having an old one that can be
replaced easily if it breaks isn't really a good option, when compared to
something that will work reliably.
|
keesan
|
|
response 13 of 75:
|
Mar 13 14:36 UTC 2000 |
Are these calls worth $50?!!!!! Jim and I purchased used answering machines
ten years ago from a friend who got different ones for his business. We got
one for each of us, plus a third for a backup. We have never had to use the
third one. They are both still working perfectly, though I did manage to
break the belt on one by my own stupidity (I forced a tape in it, it was easy
to replace the belt for $2). Of the answering machines coming into Kiwanis,
it is very obvious if they are not working - they do not take messages, or
the microphone does not record. The newer machines are built cheaper, to sell
cheaper, with smaller motors that rewind more slowly and burn out, with
cheaper mechanisms that stop working, and with very skinny belts. Or they
are digital, and all sorts of screwy things go wrong with them that you would
not obviously notice. People are starting to come in for the tape type to
replace their unreliable digital ones.
The more expensive newer machines have more features, not more
reliability. More to go wrong.
I am willing to test out a used answering machine for a week on my own
line (which I use for 'important' business calls, which are worth at least
$50 each to me) and then donate it to grex. In fact I can test two and give
you a matched pair.
This is not exactly consistent behavior for an organization operating
on used computer equipment, and with 12 or so used modems which reliably hang
up on people (to the point that two of the people we signed up told us they
did not see the point in paying membership dues any longer). For the price
of an unneeded answering machine, grex could replace one of its 14.4 modems
with a 56k external modem on one of the phone lines (I think - is there some
reason it could not?) which people could dial into specifically if they wanted
to download a large file.
Is the phone number listed with the DNS service used by anyone other
than people trying to sell grex something? I am also willing to let grex use
my phone number for such calls, and I already have an answering machine. (I
would still be happy to give STeve a free answering machine for personal
calls.) Jim is equally willing to let grex use his answering machine. Or
I can stick an answering machine on the phone line at the house we are
building, which gets almost no calls, and which we would check regularly for
these very important messages.
|
keesan
|
|
response 14 of 75:
|
Mar 13 15:47 UTC 2000 |
Is the $5000 still in the bank?!!! If so, we are still losing $200/year in
interest, which could be used to purchase 4-5 new modems/year. Today it took
me four tries to dial in to grex. Kept getting no carrier. I finally had
to dial 761-5041.
I would not mind also getting phone calls on the answering machine at
the building site from prospective grex users. Since we would be checking
that answering machine regularly we would know that it was working. I call
Jim there about once a day to tell him to come back for lunch, and I could
leave a message on the machine and make sure the machine was working. The
phone there is in use possibly half an hour a week. I don't know what else
Steve was planning to use his phone line for, maybe personal calls?
Is there some reason grex is not using faster modems?
|
keesan
|
|
response 15 of 75:
|
Mar 13 17:42 UTC 2000 |
After consulting with Ross, Jim has decided that we can offer to let
grex use the Kiwanis electronics department phone number, which he can put
an answering machine on and check regularly (three or more times a week when
he is there) and also use to leave messages to himself and other volunteers.
Someone tell us what sort of message you would like to see on it, if not
'Please leave a message on this machine for Cyberspace Communications (also
known as grex) or the Kiwanis electronics department'. Since Jim leaves
himself a lot of reminders, he would notice very soon if the machine did not
work perfectly, and could replace it with a choice of 30 other ones.
The problem with leaving messages at our building site is that often it takes
us up to 10 rings to get to the phone from up a ladder, and we don't want to
have to remember to turn the machine off when there and on when leaving.
If you want to put the Kiwanis phone number as a contact number for
prospective new users (for instance on the TV ad) we can also offer them very
cheap computers or help signing up. We already get lots of calls at that
number from people who forgot their passwords or can't figure out how to
delete messages, so it could also be a general help number for Wed. evenings
6-10, for those people who don't even know how to send e-mail calls for help.
|
scott
|
|
response 16 of 75:
|
Mar 13 17:50 UTC 2000 |
The_problem_with_casual_use_of_other_phones_and_<100_answering_machines_is__
that_the_Secret_Service_is_not_likely_to_be_calling_to_offer_us_$50_worth_of_
business.__They_will_have_serious_issues_to_discuss._________________________
|
flem
|
|
response 17 of 75:
|
Mar 13 20:35 UTC 2000 |
From what I understand, the kind of phone calls we expect to be getting on
this phone line are from people, such as the Secret Service, who require
particular technical services from Grex's staff, not from users looking to
find out more about Grex. The staff members present at the board meeting
suggested that STeve was the person most appropriate to provide those kinds
of technical services, and he agreed to do so. That's why the phone number
is STeve's. There doesn't seem to be any good reason to change that.
|
keesan
|
|
response 18 of 75:
|
Mar 13 20:57 UTC 2000 |
We would be happy to give Steve's phone number to anyone calling for him.
There doesn't seem to me to be any good reason for throwing away $50 on a new
answering machine when we have plenty of working used ones, and if you are
afraid that a used machine will stop working if nobody calls it for three
months, this is a number that will be getting calls anyway and the answering
machine would be checked regularly. How often does the Secret Service call?
Bank of Ann Arbor pays 4% interest on savings accounts, $100 minimum, and has
free checking, $700 minimum, in case it is too much work or too inconvenient
to use PAX at slightly higher interest.
We could also give STeve's e-mail address out to anyone who called, in fact
why does grex want the DNS people to have a phone number at all?
I repeat my offer to provide an answering machine which I consider to be high
quality (ATT makes very durable ones that are easy to use) and which I will
test on my business line for a week first. In fact I can provide a matched
pair of these.
|
dpc
|
|
response 19 of 75:
|
Mar 13 22:02 UTC 2000 |
The Board has made its decision, which I think was a good one.
|
keesan
|
|
response 20 of 75:
|
Mar 13 22:25 UTC 2000 |
Please explain why you think a new answering machine, most of which are built
to sell cheaply, will work better than a better-built used one which I have
tested for a week.
|
scg
|
|
response 21 of 75:
|
Mar 13 22:45 UTC 2000 |
Sindi, give it a rest, please. A new answering machine will be considered
better if STeve says it is, because he is the one volunteering to deal with
it, and he's the one who needs to deal with it if it breaks. We're not
talking about a huge amount of money here.
|
eeyore
|
|
response 22 of 75:
|
Mar 13 23:57 UTC 2000 |
And also, please note the wording of "up to 50". We aren't against him paying
less. :) But since he does know the inner workings of the system inside out
and upside down, and he's willing to take the calls, it only seems fair to
me to make it as easy access as possible for him.
I also believe that with the seriousness of the phone calls that would be
coming in on the line, every precaution is necessary, just to keep the
government happy and out of our hair.
|
mdw
|
|
response 23 of 75:
|
Mar 14 01:47 UTC 2000 |
I've got an older used answering machine at home. I gave up using it
because it stopped being reliable - it was one of the casette tape ones,
and I suspect the rubber bands finally gave out. A used unit is also
much less likely to come with an instruction manual (I'm pretty sure I
never got one with mine). Having said that, I have no real objection to
a used one, but I would also prefer to leave this up to STeve who will
have to live with the thing.
|
gull
|
|
response 24 of 75:
|
Mar 14 02:43 UTC 2000 |
Some of the new machines have the advantage of having no moving parts.
Hmm...maybe someone should have the duty of calling the line biweekly, to
make sure it still works? The new electronic machines are pretty reliable,
but I've seen them quit after getting pegged by lightning.
keesan, my understanding is that Grex's modems aren't the normal, off the
shelf consumer items you usually see. Generally ISPs use rackmount modems.
One of the big advantages is that this means all the modems are the same,
and fully interchangable -- imagine having five different brands of modem,
each needing a different initialization string!
|