|
|
| Author |
Message |
albaugh
|
|
Coop miscellaneous item
| 
Jul 24 18:33 UTC 1998 |
Use this item for miscellaneous things that don't seem to warrant their own
items.
|
| 45 responses total. |
albaugh
|
|
response 1 of 45:
|
Jul 24 18:34 UTC 1998 |
Why was coop restarted at this particular time? It seems rather abrupt, as
I hadn't seen any recent discussion on a coop restart. How about some JIT
warning?
|
remmers
|
|
response 2 of 45:
|
Jul 24 18:51 UTC 1998 |
It was discussed a fair amount a few weeks ago. You can still join the
previous coop as "oldcoop".
|
rcurl
|
|
response 3 of 45:
|
Jul 24 20:11 UTC 1998 |
I do agree with Kevin that an announcement that coop would be restarted
on such-and-such a day would have been appropriate, even perhaps with
information about what items would be carried over into it. When I
joined (new)coop I was, of course, only showed the first and last items,
but there were quite a few others, some old and some new. It wasted a little
time to check them all out to see if I had seen them before or not.
(I don't suppose my participation file in linked items could also be
linked....?)
|
janc
|
|
response 4 of 45:
|
Jul 24 20:33 UTC 1998 |
Linking participation files would require a total redesign of Picospan.
We were tempted to support that with Backtalk, but it would have left
Backtalk incompatible with Picospan.
|
davel
|
|
response 5 of 45:
|
Jul 24 20:47 UTC 1998 |
Someone should freeze the conference creation & deletion items right away.
|
aruba
|
|
response 6 of 45:
|
Jul 24 21:19 UTC 1998 |
I also would have appreciated a warning.
|
scg
|
|
response 7 of 45:
|
Jul 25 05:03 UTC 1998 |
I was surprised by the restart, but that's ok. It needed to be done.
|
remmers
|
|
response 8 of 45:
|
Jul 25 18:09 UTC 1998 |
I'm currently reading this conference via Backtalk and find the
background color too dark for easy reading.
|
mdw
|
|
response 9 of 45:
|
Jul 26 21:12 UTC 1998 |
Linked items were a "late" addition to PicoSpan. Doing the "proper" thing
isn't as simple as it looks -- what happens when you "forget" an item in
one cf? Etc.
|
davel
|
|
response 10 of 45:
|
Jul 27 11:51 UTC 1998 |
Well, if you participation files were linked, you probably wouldn't *need*
to forget the thing in only one conference. Agreed that the design issues
are not simple, at all.
|
albaugh
|
|
response 11 of 45:
|
Jul 27 19:29 UTC 1998 |
Hold it right there, partner. I *want* forget to work in only one conference.
E.g. when someone links something from coop to agora, I don't want to read
it in agora, so I'll forget it there, *counting on the fact* that I'll be able
to read it in coop.
|
remmers
|
|
response 12 of 45:
|
Jul 27 19:52 UTC 1998 |
Clearly we need both "weak forget" and "strong forget" commands.
Or maybe not.
|
dpc
|
|
response 13 of 45:
|
Jul 28 17:48 UTC 1998 |
I was also surprised by the restart, but I got over it. 8-)
|
davel
|
|
response 14 of 45:
|
Jul 28 23:29 UTC 1998 |
So did I.
Hmm. Now that the conference creation/deletion logs are frozen, I find time
to ponder ... aren't the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws items normally
frozen, too?
Sorry to nitpick.
|
valerie
|
|
response 15 of 45:
|
Jul 29 13:18 UTC 1998 |
This response has been erased.
|
tsty
|
|
response 16 of 45:
|
Jul 29 15:33 UTC 1998 |
...and now void is *true-blue* fw of coop, instead of just in bannered
type at the beginning of teh confernence. (display login at Ok:)
nice, easy, smooth, transition ... the way *i* prefer it. how about you?
|
pkmaster
|
|
response 17 of 45:
|
Aug 16 05:03 UTC 1998 |
I just wanted to introduce myself to coop, and sy I really like Grex. Hi.
|
mta
|
|
response 18 of 45:
|
Aug 16 16:36 UTC 1998 |
Welcome, Phillip!
I'm glad you decided to join our little community.
|
arthurp
|
|
response 19 of 45:
|
Aug 18 23:11 UTC 1998 |
Hey, great to see someone jump in here. :)
|
dang
|
|
response 20 of 45:
|
Sep 27 17:39 UTC 1998 |
I'm sorry about the abruptness of the restart. I, of course, was
working on it all along, so it wasn't abrupt to me. In the future, I
will try to provide warning.
|
lilmo
|
|
response 21 of 45:
|
Sep 29 00:15 UTC 1998 |
And I was gone all summer, so I didn't even notice. :-)
|
void
|
|
response 22 of 45:
|
Jan 5 05:50 UTC 1999 |
i retired item 64, since it had more to do with a scheme of
questionable legality than it did with running grex.
|
lilmo
|
|
response 23 of 45:
|
Feb 6 18:03 UTC 1999 |
Amen.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 24 of 45:
|
Nov 11 06:45 UTC 1999 |
I'm in lazy (or in a hurry, by your courtesy). Does grex have a policy
or practice on cutting off the access of people who harrass other grex
users? Or, more generally, does grex have a statement of conditions of
use or authorised use policy?
|