|
|
| Author |
Message |
xix
|
|
Morality vs Business
|
Mar 27 23:12 UTC 2002 |
For the Microsoft product line, ease of use was a hallmark for managers
who offered comments. “I like how the tables are set up,” said a Naval
Surface Warfare Center computer specialist in Indian Head, Md., adding
that his organization plans to standardize its database configuration on
Microsoft software. But a Social Security Administration computer
specialist in San Francisco said upgrading Microsoft databases was tricky
because it causes new bugs in the system. Discussing overall strategies,
systems managers who plan to make database changes are looking for ways
to make their systems more efficient. “We have too much data
duplication,” said an Air Force systems manager in Mesa, Ariz., who plans
to consolidate three databases in the next two years to make management
easier. Consolidating databases to standardize systems is a goal at the
U.S. Pretrial Services Agency in San Antonio, said an IT director. A
Federal Bureau of Investigation computer specialist in Washington said
his organization was planning to consolidate databases because “fewer are
easier to control.”
http://www.gcn.com/21_1/knowmgmt/17695-1.html
---------
SiliconValley.com part of San Jose Mercury News - AOL backs anti-
Microsoft identity technology.
In a move aimed at thwarting Microsoft Corp. dominance of online
identification technology, AOL Time Warner Inc. has joined a coalition of
companies working to develop a competing platform.
AOL announced Tuesday that it would aid the Liberty Alliance Project, a
group of almost three dozen companies working on an identity
authentication and payment program that will compete with Microsoft's
Passport system.
Liberty Alliance seeks to allow Internet users to log in once but gain
access to various Internet resources that require authentication.
Microsoft's Passport system already offers the same capabilities.
An AOL spokesman said the company would also continue to develop its own
identification system, known as Magic Carpet, but would share programming
expertise with Liberty Alliance partners ensure the systems are
compatible.
http://techupdate.zdnet.com/techupdate/stories/main/
0,14179,2816148,00.html
... Meanwhile, government watchers say a federally sponsored national ID
would meet widespread opposition.
"It would improve the ability to identify and track people. But I can't
identify how much it would improve things," said Bob Inman, who served as
director of the National Security Agency and as deputy director of the
Central Intelligence Agency. "You can persuade Congress to act explicitly
when you know what you'll accomplish. But I don't think law enforcement
agencies are capable of making a case of what precisely they'd gain from
it. And if they can't, they won't get congressional approval."
Talk about national IDs has also moved the American Civil Liberties Union
to get involved, while doubting the issue will be ad dressed, said Nadine
Strossen, ACLU president. "We now have to take it seriously," she said.
--------
CNET NEWS.COM - Ellison donates software for U.S. security.
Oracle Chief Executive Larry Ellison said Tuesday that he has donated
Oracle software to the U.S. government to create a database for national
security.
After the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, Ellison has championed the need for
the United States to create a national standard for identification cards.
During his keynote speech at Oracle's OpenWorld customer conference in
San Francisco, Ellison said he has delivered Oracle's 9i database
management software to a U.S. government agency for national security,
but he declined to give further details, such as which agency or for what
usage.
http://news.com.com/2100-1001-276615.html?legacy=cnet&tag=mn_hd
|
| 17 responses total. |
other
|
|
response 1 of 17:
|
Mar 27 23:28 UTC 2002 |
What's your point?
|
oval
|
|
response 2 of 17:
|
Mar 27 23:33 UTC 2002 |
that buisnesses should represent high moral values since the government
obviously can't?
or
fuck it, i'ma make a killin offa this.
|
xix
|
|
response 3 of 17:
|
Mar 28 00:15 UTC 2002 |
This article, as positioned against the previous article, is to draw some
lines of similarities between things that are occurring now with things
that occured in the 1930's. It was a time of economic depression, where
people were unhappy and needed someone to blame. It was a time of war and
hatred where the people wanted (and needed) a leader desperately to bring
them out of their unfortunate way. It made possible for a government to
systematically target a specific group of people while business made
money without a regard to ethics. I was thinking this would be very
obvious.
|
other
|
|
response 4 of 17:
|
Mar 28 03:04 UTC 2002 |
That's like saying the Earth and Pluto are similar, just because they're
both planets, (very) roughly sheroid in shape, and orbit the same sun.
Kinda like saying jp2 is like remmers. There may be a kernel of truth,
in the statement, but the rest of the story paints rather a different
picture.
|
jp2
|
|
response 5 of 17:
|
Mar 28 03:42 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|
bdh3
|
|
response 6 of 17:
|
Mar 28 07:46 UTC 2002 |
I like XiXi's (a pun) juxtaposition of the satanic Micro$oft
with IBM in these two items. Even if the assertion about IBM
is true and it wasn't merely looking out for shareholder equity
motivated its hard to see how the current IBM (among other things
the largest micro$oft var/OEM) can even be mentioned in the same
breath with that evil empire, Micro$oft. Its not really that
much of a stretch to compare Mircro$oft and their regard to other
software vendors and that of the nazis. Compare the adulation
of hitler with Gates? The tactics are similar as is the goal.
|
janc
|
|
response 7 of 17:
|
Mar 28 15:03 UTC 2002 |
Well, Microsoft and once-upon-a-time IBM are certainly similar in their use
of monopolistic power to try to extend their control to new markets. In such
an environment, if some dictator is trying to round up people, then he is
likely to be using computers, and if he is using computers he is likely to
be using products from the current monopolistic computer company and getting
technical support from them. It's the nature of monopolies to have their
fingers in *everything* that they can get their fingers into.
I think the comparison between profiling of Arabs in America and of Jews in
WWII Germany is a bit overheated, but I don't see anything amazing about the
existance of connections from Microsoft to one and IBM to the other. They
were each into *everything*.
|
tpryan
|
|
response 8 of 17:
|
Mar 28 18:46 UTC 2002 |
The 1920s and 1930s were also a big of big technological
change, perhaps faster than today. It took the goverment to
protect consumers with such things as defining can size for goods
sold in grocery stores (it was a rather new thing)--each canner was
picking different sizes, making it hard to comparision shop to
defining the radio dial for broadcast stations --each station
radio manufacturor wanted exclusive rights to their frequencies.
Mister, we need a man like Hebert Hoover again!
|
gull
|
|
response 9 of 17:
|
Mar 29 14:44 UTC 2002 |
What I don't get about a 'national ID card' is how it's supposed to
stop something like 9/11 from happening. Most of the hijackers were in
the country *legally*.
|
other
|
|
response 10 of 17:
|
Mar 29 16:28 UTC 2002 |
Yeah, but darn it, we'd know EXACTLY who they were!
|
senna
|
|
response 11 of 17:
|
Mar 29 21:29 UTC 2002 |
Of course, and then we could find out who's responsible and destroy his
country. We wouldn't want to take any action on shakey proof.
|
oval
|
|
response 12 of 17:
|
Mar 29 21:36 UTC 2002 |
uvCAWZnot!
|
gull
|
|
response 13 of 17:
|
Mar 30 01:01 UTC 2002 |
It'll just be stolen, forged, or obtained with false information, like
happens to every other ID card we have.
|
bdh3
|
|
response 14 of 17:
|
Mar 30 04:44 UTC 2002 |
re#9: isn't that 'all' not 'most'?
|
oval
|
|
response 15 of 17:
|
Mar 30 04:56 UTC 2002 |
let's deprt everyone legal. they cant be trusted.
|
gull
|
|
response 16 of 17:
|
Apr 1 16:57 UTC 2002 |
Re #14: Not strictly speaking. A couple of them were on expired
visas. However, they'd applied for student visas, and apparently since
the INS is so hideously slow and understaffed it was the practice at
the time to let people reenter the country before their applications
were granted. (I believe that in this case if they had filed the
application for renewal the day they got their original visas, the INS
*still* wouldn't have processed it by the time the visas expired.
That's how bad it is. It's hard to clean up illegal immigration when
you're making it impossible to follow the rules through bureaucratic
incompetance. I think part of the reason the INS is so underfunded is
that practically no one who votes has to deal with it.)
|
oval
|
|
response 17 of 17:
|
Apr 1 20:28 UTC 2002 |
hah exactly! (except the lawyers) ;)
|