You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-23          
 
Author Message
bdh3
Dead Cop, dead old man -over violations of building code. Mark Unseen   Mar 22 07:36 UTC 2002

http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/cst-nws-cop21.html

"Chicago police are reviewing the fatal shooting of officer Donald
Marquez to see whether officers should change the way they serve
subpoenas and make arrests in civil cases for City Hall.

Marquez was killed Monday night after breaking down a door with a
sledgehammer to arrest a reclusive 77-year-old man in a housing
case."

----
Here's where it gets interesting.  Its a 47-year old hispanic in
'plain cloths' aka street clothes - not in uniform - breaking down
the front door of a 77-year old guy in a moderately high
crime area with a sledge.  The geriatric actually owns two .22 pistols,
which is not the unusual part.  The unusual part is that they are
licensed by the city which has had strict anti-gun laws for 35 years
or so.  So a non-hispanic (dunno white or black) who, licensed to own
(and probably carry as thats the way it usually works) two pistols, has
his front door busted in at 10 o'clock at night by an hispanic in a
moderate crime area...

Now, I am not one to normaly criticize the CPD.  Indeed, I like the CPD,
UCPD, CTAPD, HAPD, PDPD and the other police officers who operate where
I live (we are well policed).  I think -in particular the CPD who have a
'crash pad' nextdoor to me - chicagoland cops are friendly and practical
and see themselves as citizens of the community and I am sad to hear one
of their members died - over building code violations.  BUT, I think
there is something wrong here...
23 responses total.
russ
response 1 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 23 04:07 UTC 2002

Obviously the old white guy was engaging in "racial profiling",
else he never would have shot at the police officer.  But hey,
what else do you expect of a member of the oppressor class who
has the gall to own guns and all that.

(One also wonders what kind of department hires people stupid
enough to break down people's doors with sledgehammers at 10 PM,
in plainclothes, and gives them badges and guns [I thought that
was limited to Detroit].  Probably the sort of department who would
take my first paragraph seriously instead of as extreme sarcasm.)
tsty
response 2 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 23 06:02 UTC 2002

was this a darwin event or a 2nd ammendment moment/

  
i'm not at all thrilled that an officer dies, but as beedy says, 
"I think there is something wrong here..."
bdh3
response 3 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 23 07:01 UTC 2002

I am not thrilled at all that a line trooper dies over what is little
more serious than failing to answer a traffic ticket.  And at the same
time I am really really bothered by the notion of police with sledge
hammer breaking down the front door of anyone's house in the middle 
of the night over such.  Its a shitty situation all the way around even
if you don't know all the local details (as I do).
scott
response 4 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 23 14:33 UTC 2002

What's the big deal?  Guy successfully defends home using legally-owned
handgun.  I don't see why beady or russ should be anything but happy.
cmcgee
response 5 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 23 15:08 UTC 2002

In their world, defending you home does not include dying yourself.  Guns
make you invincible against criminals.
rcurl
response 6 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 23 15:19 UTC 2002

Seems to me the cop made a bad mistake. 
russ
response 7 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 23 19:39 UTC 2002

Re #5:  You wanna provide a quote to that effect, or are you just
being a jerk?

In the real world, gang bangers don't shoot nearly as well as cops
(who in turn don't shoot as well as gun enthusiasts; cops get their
asses whipped in shooting competitions).  Shooting at a gang-banger
is probably a smart move (the banger will likely run even if they
aren't hit).  The cops will likely shoot back.

Unless undercover, cops should never, EVER be mistakable for crooks,
especially by their actions.  That was definitely a Darwin-level
fsckup, as bad as the plainclothes MPs who tried to disarm a sheriff's
deputy who was not a participant in their little exercise.

What's really ironic here is that the *cop* was such a lousy shot that
the 77-year-old guy, who probably hadn't been to a range in years, was
able to inflict fatal wounds with a lousy .22 pistol before being
incapacitated by return fire from a much more powerful weapon.

Conclusion:  The cops need better training, both in shooting and
in dwelling entries (and especially when not to do either).  (This
isn't my own brilliant deduction, this is what people have been
saying for years... and what's really sad is that the situation
has apparently not improved much.)
oval
response 8 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 23 21:10 UTC 2002

hah it is SO true that gangbangers can't shoot for shit. it's amazing any of
them actually kill each other despite the high number of attempts an each
other. i think most of the deaths are point blank situations. i just thought
i'd take a moment to make fun of them since they live in my 'hood' and act
like idiots. one day i came home at midnight, went into my apt, and heard a
shower of gunshots outside. i looked out my window (since i hadn't yet turned
on my lights) and saw 2 guys running past my place down the street. i called
911 and reported the number of shots and location. couple of days later i saw
an article in the paper about how L'il Kim's 'boys' had shot some guys over
an argument they were having in the bodega. they emptied their guns on this
guys and only hit him once in the leg. he ended up walking the 15 min walk
to the hospital.

when cops visit someone (especially if there's door-breaking going on) don;t
they travel in pairs???

[if you look up that article - i don't live there anymore.]

mwg
response 9 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 24 03:09 UTC 2002

Well, the world has created a situation where the police no longer have
any grounds for complaint if they get shot in any forced-entry situation.
Thugs posing as cops have taken to dressing in police-style drug-raid
gear, right down to badges and POLICE stencils on ths clothing, have been
breaking in to various residences in some of the larger cities, and
cleaning the place out, sometimes killing people as they go.  (To this
degree, this is not distinguishable from a real drug raid.)  The first
obvious sign that this is not a real raid is when they leave, real raids
have the surviving occupants packed off to jail some time prior to the
police leaving.  Needless to say, as word gets around, police gear will
not have what little psychological protective effect it once had.  People
will shoot first, figuring they have nothing to lose regardless of who
they end up shooting.
bru
response 10 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 24 03:16 UTC 2002

WE had a gangland shooting in Detroit tonight, somebody sprayed the home with
an AK-47 and killed a 3 year old girl.  Gangbangers tend to hit bystandersmore
than their targets.  

We also had a cop robbed of his service weapon and badge last night in
detroit.

Wonder what they wanted with those?
jazz
response 11 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 24 14:37 UTC 2002

        Of course gangbangers can't shoot straight.  Ever tried to control
muzzle rise when you're making that oh-so-hardcore Ice-T fist and holding the
pistol sideways?
slynne
response 12 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 24 17:58 UTC 2002

Bru, of course, barely lives within 50 miles of Detroit so I am not 
sure who he means when he says "we" 

Anyways, the issue here clearly is not gun ownership or defending one's 
home with a gun or even race. The issue is police procedure. It is bad 
procedure to go banging down someone's door at 10p in plain clothes 
unless one has a VERY good reason to do so. It is a shame that this 
police officer got shot but think about how it would look for the 
department if it was the 77 year old who ended up dead? 



bdh3
response 13 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 24 19:18 UTC 2002

(re#12: Uh, the item title was 
'Dead Cop, dead old man -over violations of building code.'
What part of 'dead old man' was difficult?
slynne
response 14 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 24 21:15 UTC 2002

Ooops. I missed that. Ok but the PD can still blame the dead cop can 
not look quite as bad. 
oval
response 15 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 24 22:28 UTC 2002

lol@#11
tsty
response 16 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 25 18:15 UTC 2002

beadyh, can you fet a url for that story. i did a quickie search that
turned up nothing.
bdh3
response 17 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 26 04:44 UTC 2002

Uh, you might try:

http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/cst-nws-cop21.html

void
response 18 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 27 20:05 UTC 2002

The short version is that the cop was f*cking moron and deserved what he
got.
tsty
response 19 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 27 21:53 UTC 2002

thankxxx fer de url ... amazing, simply amazing in a VeryNegativeWay (tm).
  
 City Corporation Counsel Mara Georges said the officers decided to 
 visit Wolk's home at 10 p.m. because they did not want him to spend 
 the entire day Monday in jail waiting for his Tuesday hearing.

 "I don't know that any mistakes were made," Georges said. "I know the 
 Police Department is reviewing the entire situation and has not 
 determined whether any changes in procedure are necessary."

 (Don's brother, Dan, said,) "I can't even begin to speculate whether 
 the procedures were right or wrong," he said. "Don used to say that 
 serving a summons was like delivering a pizza. That was his 
 approach to the job. "
  
  
and the city lawyer can't even say 'mistakes were made?'  <damn!>
  
  
bdh3
response 20 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 28 08:17 UTC 2002

The rest of the story is that the arrest warrant was months old.  The 
dead cop apparently was well known to the dead old fart.  Apparently
some 'community activist' had actually tried to buy the building
where the dead old guy lived and offered the DOG rent free living
for the rest of the DOG's life on account the DOG din't seem to have
living family.  The dead cop did seem to indeed go out of his way
to 'work' the situation - he didn't try to bust the door down months
ago.  When you know the details it is even more a sad story and you
just gotta suspect a white-shirt somplace had a senior moment and
the dead cop was acting against his own better judgement (was a
street smart cop of long tenure).

tsty
response 21 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 30 17:23 UTC 2002

or perhaps a brand spankable new white shirt got tough on
his first day on the job ... which would make it even stupider.
mvpel
response 22 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 31 21:24 UTC 2002

Re: 8, 11: http://www.birdman.org/images/hnsbig.jpg
bdh3
response 23 of 23: Mark Unseen   Apr 1 02:03 UTC 2002

re#22:  Now *that* was funny.  I'm sure it will show up in
the anti-gun literature as a serious example of the problem...

it also assumes a level of familiarity with marksmanship
that is demonstrably not present in the purported target market
for the product.
 0-23          
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss