|
Grex > Agora35 > #51: Fashion trends of the new millenium | |
|
| Author |
Message |
keesan
|
|
Fashion trends of the new millenium
|
Oct 4 13:33 UTC 2000 |
How have fashions changed in the last two or three years? Clothing, cars,
foods, houses, etc. We had been predicting some major changes around the
millenium - for instance bright colors again instead of gloomy black as people
realized that the world was not really going to end. There was even a fashion
for black dogs - has that changed now? What breeds of dogs are now 'in'?
Are iguanas still high-style? What foods are faddish, and what are you
currently supposed to be avoiding if it is no longer fat?
|
| 123 responses total. |
beeswing
|
|
response 1 of 123:
|
Oct 4 15:23 UTC 2000 |
no longer fat, or phat?
I dunno, I still wear a lot of black, and I never thought the world was
going to end. Last time I remember wearing bright colors was in the mid
80s when neon was the thing.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 2 of 123:
|
Oct 4 17:26 UTC 2000 |
Whose fashions?
|
keesan
|
|
response 3 of 123:
|
Oct 4 17:27 UTC 2000 |
People also started wearing dark colors (browns) in the mid-70s when the price
of oil went up. Maybe dark colors were supposed to absorb more heat?
I have seen lots of bright orange, yellow, pink and green recently. (Clothes,
not dogs).
|
scott
|
|
response 4 of 123:
|
Oct 4 18:12 UTC 2000 |
Very bright colors pop up in fashion now and then, but tend to fall out of
fashion rather quickly and thoroughly.
100 years ago people wore black and brown almost all the time.
|
flem
|
|
response 5 of 123:
|
Oct 4 18:14 UTC 2000 |
Are there actually people on this planet who think like that when they pick
clothes? I don't think I know anybody who does. I once wore mosly black for
a while when I was consistenly in a bad mood, and black was one way I could
express a part of that mood. But I never once thought that the world was
going to end, or considered the relative heat transfer efficiency of my
clothing. Now I almost always pick my clothes based on *how they look*.
|
scott
|
|
response 6 of 123:
|
Oct 4 18:17 UTC 2000 |
I pay attention to thermal transfer properties quite a bit... usually it means
wearing a coat in winter. ;)
However, solar heat collection plays a factor in summer. Summer is when all
the dark shirts sit in the bottom of the drawer.
|
mooncat
|
|
response 7 of 123:
|
Oct 4 20:57 UTC 2000 |
I like my clothing to be very mix-and-matchable... so a lot of it is
dark simply because I like dark clothes... just not so much in the
summer, also, I think that given my coloring I look better in dark
clothes- hence I wear them more.
As far as fads and things? Well, platforms left and came back... now
we're on what, platform tennies and sandals? There's also the ever so
tacky 'tank-top with bra strap showing' look many young girls seem to
be going for.
Hmm... will have to ponder this more later.
|
cmcgee
|
|
response 8 of 123:
|
Oct 4 20:59 UTC 2000 |
According to some newspaper (either the NYTimes or the A2Snooze) the
"bra-strap-showing-bit" is an actual fashion statement. Victoria's Secret
has special thingies to decorate them.
(Don't ask me, I only report what I read ;-)
|
edina
|
|
response 9 of 123:
|
Oct 4 21:17 UTC 2000 |
Thank God!! I thought I was the only one who hated the whole bra strap thing.
|
keesan
|
|
response 10 of 123:
|
Oct 4 23:57 UTC 2000 |
150 years ago, when aniline dyes were invented, bright colors like purple were
in fashion for a while. I think this was following a period of drab dark
colors, which followed a period of whites and pastels. Anything for a change.
Are there any recent fashions in foods? Is quiche still around? It was a
common dorm lunch in the late sixties. What are the dorms serving now?
|
hematite
|
|
response 11 of 123:
|
Oct 5 01:12 UTC 2000 |
Chicken, chicken, and more chicken. Or at least that's we get at Brody
Caf.
|
senna
|
|
response 12 of 123:
|
Oct 5 04:39 UTC 2000 |
I've rarely followed fashion trends. I wore almost exclusively black for a
while, but it was mostly because I liked the color and it was amusing. My
current jersey craze has put that to rest, and now I settle for conventional
clothing with little stylistic appeal with a jersey of some sort on top.
Don't get me started on *those* trends.
|
scg
|
|
response 13 of 123:
|
Oct 5 07:16 UTC 2000 |
I mostly wear jeans or shorts and a tee shrit, and don't give it too much
thought. I do tend to avoid wearing black on hot days, since it's rather
uncomfortable.
|
jerryr
|
|
response 14 of 123:
|
Oct 5 13:11 UTC 2000 |
lots of times what you purchase is a function of what stores are selling.
|
jazz
|
|
response 15 of 123:
|
Oct 5 14:02 UTC 2000 |
It's not too common to see people buy things that aren't being sold,
no.
|
brighn
|
|
response 16 of 123:
|
Oct 5 14:56 UTC 2000 |
They try. "Can I buy that display?" and "How much for the lighting fixtures?"
But usually they only succeed during going-out-of-business sales, when those
items really ARE for sale (which is how I got Armand, my mannequin).
|
jazz
|
|
response 17 of 123:
|
Oct 5 15:07 UTC 2000 |
Which is another thing that bugs me. A&F often has items that're for
display (and even specially tagged) that they won't sell, and they tend to
be the nicest looking of the lot, and Hudson's absolutely refuses to sell me
the artistic-looking shelving they have holding bath-towels in the third floor
of one of their larger stores.
|
scg
|
|
response 18 of 123:
|
Oct 5 19:05 UTC 2000 |
Somebody ahead of me in line at the K Mart in Emeryville a month ago was
trying to buy a sleeping bag that had been on a store shelf. The cashier
couldn't get the computer to show a price for it, so she called the manager
over. The manager insisted that while the sleeping bag may still have been
on the shelves, they didn't sell it anymore, and could only sell the customer
a more expensive sleeping bag that they still sold. They held up the line
for about 20 minutes arguing about it. Only in California...
|
danr
|
|
response 19 of 123:
|
Oct 5 23:59 UTC 2000 |
That's a perfect example of why KMart is lagging behind WalMart and other
discount retailers.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 20 of 123:
|
Oct 6 00:05 UTC 2000 |
I have to admit that the last time I wanted to buy anything at K-Mart
I wound up walking out because the line was way too long.. The store
had close to twenty registers that could have been open but I don't
think I've ever been in a K-Mart where more than three were going at
any given time. Poor customer service can kill you pretty quickly when
you've got cutthroat competition..
|
scg
|
|
response 21 of 123:
|
Oct 6 03:41 UTC 2000 |
It's not a KMart thing. I've found very few businesses in the Bay Area that
are better than that.
|
xcalibur
|
|
response 22 of 123:
|
Oct 6 04:51 UTC 2000 |
It is a K-Mart thing. Trust me. As an employee I can tell you that K-Marts
are getting really bad at scheduling the right number of checkout operators.
Or biggest complaint is too much waiting. But what can we do when the dumb
fucks in upper management won't give us hours to work with. They'd rather keep
it in thier pockets with their nice little million dollar bonus check every
year. 200 K-Mart locations have been closed down nationwide in the last year.
Our stock value plummets more very day. Listen to me I'm saying "our"...ugh.
I mean THEIR stock value. I can without a doubt say that K-Mart is the
franchise most likely to disappear in the 1st decade of the century...if
things continue at this rate.
|
scg
|
|
response 23 of 123:
|
Oct 6 05:13 UTC 2000 |
Ok, so maybe KMart and California is a bad combination. As I said, that level
of customer service is typical here.
I'd love to have Meijer open a store here. We don't really have an equivalent
here, nor do the KMarts, WalMarts, and so forth I've found here stay open past
9 pm.
|
senna
|
|
response 24 of 123:
|
Oct 6 05:42 UTC 2000 |
Ha. You have no idea what bad checkouts are like. Before you think that I'm
exagerating, let me assure you: I have seen long checkout lines at their very
worst. :)
I don't know about Kmart. I have never been impressed by any Kmarts I have
gone in, and I fail to see why anybody would select them over, say, Target.
The one on Maple, for instance, is dirty, badly organized, and unnattractive.
Walmart's supercenters run roughly in the same niche as Meijer does, and we
consider them to be our primary competition. What a life that is. Walmart
has a bit too much money for us to beat them. I believe our real competition
is to actually survive as a private company without a nationwide presence
within our local markets. To their credit, corporate is taking serious steps
to compete. I don't think that the employees really care much about that,
though. Most of my coworkers tend to be concerned with more immediate issues,
like getting their breaks on time and how understaffed we are.
|