|
|
| Author |
Message |
joep
|
|
underage pics
| 
Nov 19 17:02 UTC 2000 |
underage pics
read
browse
exit
help
|
| 19 responses total. |
happyboy
|
|
response 1 of 19:
|
Nov 19 17:05 UTC 2000 |
wecome to grex, it gets sleazier!
8D
|
pfv
|
|
response 2 of 19:
|
Nov 19 17:19 UTC 2000 |
<pfv rolls on the floor laughing>
|
brighn
|
|
response 3 of 19:
|
Nov 19 22:54 UTC 2000 |
underage picS? where?
|
birdy
|
|
response 4 of 19:
|
Nov 20 02:40 UTC 2000 |
<is still on the floor trying to stop laughing>
|
mdw
|
|
response 5 of 19:
|
Nov 20 02:44 UTC 2000 |
Perhaps he's looking for underage picts. In which case, he's presumably
a few millenia too late.
|
krj
|
|
response 6 of 19:
|
Nov 20 04:17 UTC 2000 |
"Why do they come to Grex? It's sex sex SEX!" -- Ann Arbor Observer,
some years back.
|
jazz
|
|
response 7 of 19:
|
Nov 20 16:33 UTC 2000 |
Hahahaha.
|
brighn
|
|
response 8 of 19:
|
Nov 20 23:23 UTC 2000 |
Picts ran around naked. Even the underage ones.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 9 of 19:
|
Nov 21 01:01 UTC 2000 |
dude, no way!
|
mcnally
|
|
response 10 of 19:
|
Nov 21 01:32 UTC 2000 |
So we've got someone looking for blue pict pics? I don't know what the
age of majority is for images, but I'd imagine any authentic pict pics
couldn't possibly be "underage"..
|
albaugh
|
|
response 11 of 19:
|
Nov 21 22:38 UTC 2000 |
!finger joep
Login: joep Name: impampie
Dunno how to parse that, but starting with "imp" comes to mind... ;-)
|
brighn
|
|
response 12 of 19:
|
Nov 22 03:31 UTC 2000 |
Actually, it sounds like somebody wants blue blue pict pics.
|
carson
|
|
response 13 of 19:
|
Nov 22 07:17 UTC 2000 |
(doesn't he want to pick blue blue pict pics?)
|
bdh3
|
|
response 14 of 19:
|
Nov 22 08:32 UTC 2000 |
If you want porno files of underage children please send me mail.
|
bru
|
|
response 15 of 19:
|
Nov 22 12:34 UTC 2000 |
How many pics can a blue pict pick, if a blue pict could pick pics?
|
brighn
|
|
response 16 of 19:
|
Nov 22 17:58 UTC 2000 |
He's blue because he can't pick any blue blue pict pics.
Beady's an undercover fed. It's entrapment.
|
albaugh
|
|
response 17 of 19:
|
Nov 22 22:19 UTC 2000 |
Actually, "the law" has indicated that such entrapment is allowed, FBOW.
|
brighn
|
|
response 18 of 19:
|
Nov 23 00:33 UTC 2000 |
that doesn't make it non-entrapment (whether it's legal or not).
|
aaron
|
|
response 19 of 19:
|
Nov 24 04:52 UTC 2000 |
Actually, it does. If entrapment is defined to exclude the conduct, the
conduct is not entrapment. N'est-ce pas?
|