You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-5          
 
Author Message
bdh3
Irangate -or- Contragate pt. II Mark Unseen   Oct 31 07:08 UTC 2000

October 31, 2000

                   Top Hill Republicans
                   reject Albright offer 

                   By Bill Gertz
                   THE WASHINGTON TIMES


                        The House speaker and Senate majority
                   leader yesterday rejected an offer from
                   Secretary of State Madeleine K. Albright for
                   limited access to classified government
                   documents concerning a secret arms deal
                   between Vice President Al Gore and his
                   Russian counterpart. 
                        Mrs. Albright offered
                   to let congressional
                   leaders view — but not
                   copy — some of the
                   documents as part of a
                   congressional
                   investigation into a 1995
                   pact between Mr. Gore
                   and Viktor Chernomyrdin,
                   the Russian prime
                   minister.
                        "We categorically
                   reject your proposal to
                   allow solely the four
                   leaders of the House and Senate to read, but
                   not retain, a small fraction of the requested
                   documents," Speaker J. Dennis Hastert of
                   Illinois and Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott
                   of Mississippi said in a letter sent yesterday.
                        Without the documents, the Republican
                   leaders said, Congress cannot properly
                   investigate the matter.
                        "The elected representatives of the
                   American people are certainly entitled to the
                   requested documents in order to assess the
                   extent of damage inflicted on America's
                   credibility and security interests by the vice
                   president's ill-conceived and
                   counterproductive foray into the world of
                   secret diplomacy.
                        "Madame Secretary, administration
                   stonewalling and obstructionism of legitimate
                   requests for relevant documents must stop,"
                   they wrote.
                        A group of 10 senators, including senior
                   members and leaders, had imposed a deadline
                   of noon yesterday for the documents,
                   threatening to subpoena them if they were not
                   produced.
                        A spokesman for the Senate Foreign
                   Relations Committee said yesterday that
                   senators were still discussing whether to issue
                   subpoenas. "This is totally unacceptable,"
                   Marc Thiessen, the spokesman, said of Mrs.
                   Albright's latest offer.
                        The secret deal between Mr. Gore and Mr.
                   Chernomyrdin was intended to halt Russian
                   conventional arms sales to Iran and in
                   exchange, the United State agreed not to
                   impose penalties under U.S. nonproliferation
                   laws.
                        Lawmakers are also investigating a second
                   document, a 1995 letter from Mr.
                   Chernomyrdin to Mr. Gore that outlines
                   Russia's nuclear transfers to Iran and calls on
                   the vice president to keep the arrangement
                   secret from Congress. The documents were
                   first disclosed by The Washington Times and
                   the New York Times.
                        At closed House and Senate hearings last
                   week, State Department officials refused to
                   provide the documents or discuss their
                   contents, angering members and prompting
                   threats to subpoena the material.
                        The Clinton administration is refusing to
                   provide the documents and has dismissed
                   lawmakers' requests for copies of the
                   documents and detailed explanations of their
                   contents as election-year politics.
                        House and Senate members have said the
                   secret dealings with Russia appear to violate
                   U.S. laws, including legislation on
                   conventional arms sales to Iran, nuclear
                   transfers to Iran and laws governing the
                   submission of agreements to Congress.
                        "We have offered to provide the leadership
                   of the Senate with access to the key documents
                   at their convenience, and we'll see how that
                   materializes," State Department spokesman
                   Richard Boucher told reporters.
                        Mr. Boucher said because the matters
                   involve sensitive diplomacy, the department is
                   insisting on being "exceedingly careful" about
                   releasing the information to Congress.
                        He said publicizing the documents could
                   undermine U.S. efforts to curb the spread of
                   nuclear weapons.
                        "We have an obligation to sustain a policy
                   that has improved the national security of the
                   United States over the last six years by
                   limiting the number and quality of weapons
                   that are gone to Iran," Mr. Boucher said. "We
                   are trying to meet the congressional requests in
                   a manner that doesn't simultaneously destroy
                   our policy, which would not be in our national
                   interest."
                        Mr. Hastert and Mr. Lott said in their letter
                   that "it is grossly inaccurate and misleading to
                   assert, as your letter does, that 'As a result [of
                   the secret agreements], the security of U.S.
                   forces and those of our allies in the region has
                   been substantially enhanced.' "
                        "In fact the record of the past eight years
                   demonstrates a dramatic increase in the threat
                   posed to U.S. military forces and interests, and
                   those of our friends and allies in the Middle
                   East, as a result of Iran's burgeoning nuclear,
                   missile, and conventional weapons
                   capabilities — capabilities enhanced
                   primarily by Russian arms sales made in spirit
                   of the Gore-Chernomyrdin agreements."
                        The leaders requested that the documents
                   be furnished to the House and Senate oversight
                   committees "immediately."
                        Portions of the 1995 Gore-Chernomyrdin
                   agreement, called an "aide memoire," were
                   published by The Washington Times. A
                   second classified document, a letter from Mrs.
                   Albright to the Russian foreign minister sent in
                   January, also was published by The Times. In
                   it, Mrs. Albright states that the 1995 aide
                   memoire kept the United States from imposing
                   sanctions on Russian as required by U.S. law.
                        Several senators have said the documents
                   show the Clinton administration appears to
                   violate the law.
                        Numerous U.S. intelligence reports have
                   shown that Russia is continuing to sell
                   conventional and nuclear technology and
                   goods to Iran despite the secret agreements
                   with the United States.

-------------------------------------

There was 'no controlling legal authority'...?
5 responses total.
bru
response 1 of 5: Mark Unseen   Oct 31 19:57 UTC 2000

So we said the russians can give nuclear weapons technology to Iran, home to
terrorists?
rcurl
response 2 of 5: Mark Unseen   Oct 31 20:01 UTC 2000

That was as clear as mud.
gull
response 3 of 5: Mark Unseen   Nov 1 20:22 UTC 2000

It sound more like the deal was, "if you stop giving them military
technology, we'll let you help them with other stuff and we won't tell
anyone."
i
response 4 of 5: Mark Unseen   Nov 3 01:50 UTC 2000

Somehow, this account of Congressional handling of the matter convinces
me that keeping Congress out of the loop was the only intelligent thing
to do.  
bdh3
response 5 of 5: Mark Unseen   Nov 4 09:32 UTC 2000

Right, just like in the 'contra-gate' thingy in the past...  The more
things change the more things sound much the same.
 0-5          
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss