Grex Femme Conference

Item 4: Personal Health and the tampon

Entered by mta on Wed Aug 18 20:31:59 1993:

I've been hearing lately about the possible role of tampons in the
increasing rates of endomentriosis, and thus inability to conceive
in the current generation.  I knew that they made me cramp something
awful...but does anyone have any information on other health effects
of these infernal contraptions?
114 responses total.

#1 of 114 by mta on Wed Aug 18 20:33:00 1993:

Toxic Shock Syndrome comes to mind right off.  I haven't heard of a 
case lately, but that doesn't mean it isn't happening.  Is it?


#2 of 114 by glenda on Thu Aug 19 12:55:26 1993:

Toxic Shock Syndrome was linked to the ultra super tampons, Rely in
specific (I was very upset when they took it off the market, it was the
only one I had found that would let me go more than 1-1.5 hours away from
a bathroom during my heavy flow days).  None of the tampons out today are
as absorbant as the Rely super was.  This was the problem.  Rely imbedded
little pieces of sponge in the cotton.  This super absorbancy caused super
dryness which allowed whatever buggie that cased Toxic Shock to flurrish, and
because it was so absorbant a lot of woman didn't change it often enough
which compounded the problem.

I hadn't heard of the endometriosus link, are there references I can look
up?


#3 of 114 by elfrey on Thu Aug 19 19:47:43 1993:

I love the darn things... sigh.. I suppose they are bad for me though


#4 of 114 by athena on Fri Aug 20 00:23:41 1993:

They are saying now that you can wear a Tampon up to 8 hours, while you're
sleeping...I don't think it's safe though...


#5 of 114 by glenda on Fri Aug 20 13:17:13 1993:

Have been doing it for almost 20 years with no problems (and I sometimes sleep
more than 8 hours).


#6 of 114 by gregor on Fri Aug 20 23:13:58 1993:

I've heard from both professional and non-professionaly sources that tampons
actually increase flow, as well as increase this risk of Toxic Shock.
But, I can't experiment.  Any comments/?


#7 of 114 by glenda on Sat Aug 21 12:51:22 1993:

Can't really say.  I've used tampons since my 2nd or 3rd period.  The napkin
materials used waaaay back then caused me to break out in a horrible rash so
Mom asked the Dr if it was okay for me to switch.  The only time since that
I have used pads instead was just after the kids were born.  Still got the
rash, but not quite as badly as before (thank GOD, after birth evacuation
lasts for weeks rather than days).


#8 of 114 by dana on Sun Aug 22 02:21:20 1993:

After the outbreak of TSS the Food and Drug Administration required 
manufacturers to lower tampon absorbency.  There is even an FDA
regulated definition for how many grams regular, super-absorbency, etc.
can absorb.

\I recently researched tampons in connection with dioxin.  I have
found the since the TSS outbreak of 1980 there really hasn't been
any research done regarding women and tampons.  (If I missed a study
please let me know about it, I haven't given up on the article.)

The theory I am aware of regarding tampons asserta that the tampon
can block the free flow of fluid from the uterus.   When the uterus
contracts the fluid backs up and goes into the fallopian tubes
where it can leave behind bits of endometrial tissue.  The bits of
tissue remain and respond to the chemical changes in a women's 
body as if they were in the uterus.  When the bodies signals
for the tissue to secrete the fluid and detach itself, the tissue
in the fallopian tubes responds causing pain and other symptoms
(endometriosis) to the women, as fallopian tubes weren't designed
with that in mine.

Severe cases cause scarring of the tubes as the body build scar tissue
over the tissue.  This lessens the pain since the tissue doesn't
receive and can't respond to chemical messages and interferes with
conception.

The `learned' men of our society believe that endometriosis is caused
by not having children early in life, and there does seem to be a link.
But the same generation has worn tampons most of their life.  Although
this affects 50 - 70% of U.S. women (_Ms. Magazine 11/12 1992) tampons
have never been seriously studied.

Please excuse the length and the typos.
Next!


#9 of 114 by popcorn on Wed Aug 25 03:13:21 1993:

This response has been erased.



#10 of 114 by dana on Wed Sep 1 02:19:27 1993:

I just learned recently that there have been some medical studies
done on women, tampons, and endometriosis which supports the theory
I listed above a _a_ possible cause of endometriosis.  I also learned
that there is a type of endometriosis called renegade endometriosis
which is more rare.

Renegade endometriosis is when the endometrial tissue leaves the
fallopian tubes and enters the blood stream floating around until
it attaches itself someplace in the body separate from the repro-
ductive tissue.  It is possible for it to attached itself just 
about anywhere, though probabilities vary.  Again, this is a rare
type of endometriosis.


#11 of 114 by dana on Sun Sep 19 18:39:16 1993:

Re#1    Toxic Schock Syndrome (TSS) still happens.  Since the
        FDA regulated tampon absorbency the incidence has
        fallen 93%.  A litle more than half the cases are in
        menstruating women.  The menstruating women are usually
        between the ages of 15 - 19 yrs. old.  (I don't know
        why.)  
        TSS is caused by bacteria.  tampons make a great environ-
        ment for it to grow, as do diapers.  Remember men, babies
        and women have all contracted TSS.

        I didn't mean for this to read like a Public Service announcement
        I just didn't want people to think of it as solely a women's
        problem.



#12 of 114 by craig on Tue Sep 28 07:58:33 1993:

Is that worded correctly?  They have all contracted TSS?


#13 of 114 by jett on Tue Sep 28 12:17:15 1993:

Re#12  If I read it right, craig, dana didn't say that men had contracted TSS.
       If she/he had, there would be a comma before "men", not after it.  Has
       anyone heard of men contracting TSS?


#14 of 114 by dana on Tue Sep 28 13:07:29 1993:

Sometimes those things have to be figured in by the reader, as I
don't know how to edit my responses.


#15 of 114 by popcorn on Wed Sep 29 03:19:12 1993:

This response has been erased.



#16 of 114 by wh on Wed Sep 29 15:08:39 1993:

I interpreted it to mean "Men, remember: both women and babies
can get it."


#17 of 114 by dana on Thu Sep 30 12:49:23 1993:

OK, Men, women and babies can get TSS.
bye


#18 of 114 by craig on Fri Oct 1 01:40:36 1993:

Actually, it's worded correctly to be an address to "men."

The actual problem is that it seems to say that all babies and women
have contracted TSS.

If it was including men, it would have said, "Remember:  men, babies...".

The word "all" is confusing to the reader.


#19 of 114 by popcorn on Fri Oct 1 03:56:30 1993:

This response has been erased.



#20 of 114 by gracel on Fri Oct 1 15:45:29 1993:

The "important information" insert on my box of tampons says
"TSS also occurs, however, among men, children, and non-menstruating
women."  And FWIW, after going-on-twenty years of using them, I had
laparoscopic evidence that I did _not_ have endometriosis -- that was
about 10 years ago.


#21 of 114 by mta on Sun Oct 3 04:27:39 1993:

While we're on the topic, I can now vouch for the comfort and efficacy
of the re-usable cotton mentrual pads.  They're made of a soft, pretty
flanel that seems to absorb just as well as the paper pads I had been
using.  And they just keep getting *softer* as they get washed, if you
can believe that!


#22 of 114 by young on Sun Oct 3 05:48:08 1993:

Yes, but does the darn thing have wings?


#23 of 114 by meg on Mon Oct 4 16:34:29 1993:

re #21 - I've never even seen these.  Where do you get them?

Every time I find a tampon I can deal with, they take it off the market for
one reason or another.


#24 of 114 by mta on Tue Oct 5 02:11:13 1993:

I've seen ads for the re-usable cotton pads in about 4 different magazines.
The PFC also carries them at the Packard store.  As to wings -- since you
fold them to fit, if you want wings, you get wings.


#25 of 114 by glenda on Tue Oct 5 15:23:54 1993:

They are also available at Whole Foods.


#26 of 114 by meg on Wed Oct 6 03:41:09 1993:

Gosh.  What goes around comes around.  I believe that the reusable substance
(hence the term "on the rag") method was the preferred method for hundreds
if not thousands of years prior to this century.


#27 of 114 by i on Wed Oct 6 22:50:09 1993:

Not buying all the disposables you can do is a crime against God, Nature, 
America, and the Everest Landfill Company.

Shopping is more fun than doing laundry, too.


#28 of 114 by dana on Sat Oct 16 21:30:51 1993:

You can get the flannel pads at the Peoples Food Co-op in Ypsilanti too.


#29 of 114 by popcorn on Sat Oct 16 23:45:01 1993:

This response has been erased.



#30 of 114 by garima on Sun Dec 12 07:02:09 1993:

I hate tampons. I swear by "Always" dry-weave napkins. I have used all
cotton pads before... but they are not absorbent enough. Not fluffy cotton
but more like "cotton rag".  And I *like* the ones with wings!
They definitely work much better. Now if they'd only figure out a way to 
avoid leaking in front or behind I wouldn't have to sleep on my sides all
the time.


#31 of 114 by popcorn on Sun Dec 12 15:58:34 1993:

This response has been erased.



#32 of 114 by dana on Sun Dec 12 18:58:26 1993:

  #30  Make your own napkins from "cottong rag".  Make them
       really long with wings.  It wouldn't even have to 
        look real nice.  It would just have to be functional.


#33 of 114 by garima on Mon Dec 13 20:57:14 1993:

That's an idea.


#34 of 114 by asp on Sun Nov 27 05:11:30 1994:

My mom works in an operating room.  Girls have died from wearing tampons and
not telling anyone when they're getting an operation.  

Frankly, that scares me enough to not want to put anything inside of me that
could possibly kill me.  

About the plastic layer on most pads, there are brands, I can't remember right
off, that are "earth friendly" and the top layer is cotton, they absorb
great.

Speaking of absorbing, if anyone still reading knows, for the cloth ones, do
they absorb well?  Do you just throw them into the washer?  can you wash
anything else wiht them or do you have to save them all up until the end of the
week when you have them all?



#35 of 114 by popcorn on Thu Dec 1 15:06:13 1994:

This response has been erased.



#36 of 114 by mta on Thu Dec 8 00:10:15 1994:

I use nothing but the cloth pads these days.  I like them, and I've had some
"humdingers" just lately.

I wash them in whatever cold water load I'm doing when I need them.  So
far they haven't stained anything else or done anything else
regrettable.  (I do rinse them as I remove them, and then store them in a
little bag of vinegar water til then.


#37 of 114 by dc on Thu Dec 8 23:36:24 1994:

I'm sorry, but it's not clear to me exactly why wearing a tampon 
during an operation would cause one to die.  Could someone
politely explain?


#38 of 114 by popcorn on Fri Dec 9 02:16:56 1994:

This response has been erased.



#39 of 114 by popcorn on Fri Dec 9 02:17:03 1994:

This response has been erased.



#40 of 114 by chelsea on Fri Dec 9 02:49:11 1994:

A possible scenario: A woman presents for a simple out-patient procedure.
She is never asked nor does she mention that she is presently wearing a
tampon.  During surgery there are complications and she is admitted,
possibly unable to contribute further history as questions come up.  A
week later she has developed a fever and her white count is off the wall. 
Everyone is hunting for the origin of the infection. 

Now, they'll probably find the tampon before she's truly septic but all of
this could have been avoided if the staff had been aware she was wearing a
tampon.  So current policy now is to ask every menopausal woman the date
of her last period and if she is presently wearing a tampon. 




#41 of 114 by gracel on Sun Dec 18 03:48:41 1994:

Do you mean "pre-menopausal woman"?


#42 of 114 by asp on Tue Jan 3 12:30:01 1995:

Yeah, it has to do with tss, if complications arise and the doctors don't know
that the woman is wearing a tampon, there is a chance that they won't be able
to locate the cause in time.  It has happened!


#43 of 114 by gannon on Tue Jan 3 14:33:14 1995:

It is realy scarry how there are so many dangerous products on the market that 
can hurt women and we don't even know it. I wish there was more information for
us.


#44 of 114 by popcorn on Sun Jan 8 13:42:59 1995:

This response has been erased.



#45 of 114 by mta on Mon Jan 9 04:21:31 1995:

There are, of course, better and worse products from the point of view
of possible health risks.  If you can pronounce most/all of the ingredients
list without a course in chemistry it's a batter bet, for instance.
Kiss My Face and Rachel Perry both have some good products, and the Body Shop
has some good stuff, too, if you like their color line.  (I don't; I like
cool clear colors and they go for the warm, soft colors.)


#46 of 114 by simcha on Mon Jan 9 15:48:41 1995:

I far prefer tampons and when my first kid was born I went into emotional
shock having to use a pad again!

Once, when I miscarried and had to go to the hospital, I had no pads to
control the bleeding so I used a tampon.  Boy, did the entire 
emergency room staff have a fit (and my dr. too) when they found out.



#47 of 114 by mta on Sat Jan 14 22:15:40 1995:

Tampons hurt me.  I use fabric pads.  (My mother used old socks, but I prefer
floral flannel.  It feels more dainty. )

I tried tampons, but the pain from the cramps it gave me were incapacitating.
The Dr. calls it irritable cervix, I call it hell.


#48 of 114 by headdoc on Sun Jan 15 15:20:06 1995:

Oh Misti, the image that an "irritable cervix" conjurs up is too hysterical 
for words.  . . .Sorry, honey, Can't have sex, my cervix is irritable today.
Dont mean to make light of a painful condition, its the Doctor's name for
the condition which tickles my funny bone.  I used to have excruciating
menstrual cramps and pms but tampons never bothered me.  There are some
definite advantages to being post menopausal.


#49 of 114 by popcorn on Mon Jan 16 17:52:20 1995:

This response has been erased.



#50 of 114 by gannon on Wed Jan 25 18:55:58 1995:

I have the same problems and I always get a yeast infection when I 
use tampons. Yuck!!!


#51 of 114 by popcorn on Wed Feb 8 03:18:39 1995:

This response has been erased.



#52 of 114 by simcha on Wed Feb 8 15:26:48 1995:

It was an excellent article!.


#53 of 114 by mta on Sun Feb 12 18:25:34 1995:

Which issue of consumer reports was that?


#54 of 114 by popcorn on Mon Feb 13 13:47:48 1995:

This response has been erased.



#55 of 114 by simcha on Tue Feb 14 17:49:47 1995:

I liked it because even though there is one brand of tampon I have
used and liked since I was 13 (more than 20 yeaers of brand loyalty?!)
I was totally confused by the pads in the markets, and was not happy with the
ones I had to wear post childbirth/miscarriage for lots longer than a period
lasts. The article helped explalin the differences.  To me, sanitary pads were
like space alien products; I used them 2x as a teenager at age 13, with  much
discomfort and embarassment.  


#56 of 114 by denise on Sat Mar 4 16:06:33 1995:

Hmm, I missed that article but it sounds interesting... Though I didn't
stick with brands my Mom used, as I'm more of a tampon user as apposed
to pads [though back when I used to use pads, I experimented with
various brands until I discovered I liked the tampons so much better!]


#57 of 114 by miranda on Tue Mar 28 20:42:11 1995:

My mom used tampons, I started with her brand of tampons, found them 
to be hell on earth, and then I switched to pads, and now I  am 
glad.  All this fascinating stuff about tampons scares me.  Besides
which, I find that my brand is comfortable in that it feels like an
article of clothing.  Mom does not always know best, I guess.


#58 of 114 by headdoc on Wed Mar 29 20:09:50 1995:

We "moms" rarely if ever say we "always" know best.  But I find it hard to
understand how you could prefer a pad, worn outside to an internal device.  In
terms of overall cleanliness and comfort, to me there was no comparison.  


#59 of 114 by popcorn on Thu Mar 30 00:36:23 1995:

This response has been erased.



#60 of 114 by headdoc on Thu Mar 30 22:14:33 1995:

time to take this to email . . .and discuss.


#61 of 114 by mta on Mon Apr 3 05:04:35 1995:

don't leave me out of this one, folks!

;)


#62 of 114 by headdoc on Mon Apr 3 20:31:57 1995:

Good to hear from you again Misti.  I will try to remember to send you a
"cc" when I write to Valerie. 


#63 of 114 by popcorn on Tue Apr 4 03:29:23 1995:

This response has been erased.



#64 of 114 by beeswing on Tue Sep 26 01:59:19 1995:

vsee this item has been dead for awhile... I hear the Village Voice ran an
article on the tampon industry.... anyone read it?


#65 of 114 by popcorn on Tue Sep 26 13:22:27 1995:

This response has been erased.



#66 of 114 by popcorn on Tue Sep 26 13:22:44 1995:

This response has been erased.



#67 of 114 by beeswing on Wed Sep 27 13:48:11 1995:

Tampon with a lit fuse? Hee!!! Actually the same thing happened with the
Village Voice article. It actually showed a woman wearing a tampon.... from
the side, all you could see was the string... but even VV clientele found it
too rough. The editor attributed this to body shame... I read samples of
letters, and she may have been right. This was in a  issue of Glamour.


#68 of 114 by iggy on Sat Sep 30 13:29:06 1995:

anyone hear of that florida woman who sold tshirts to wallmart?
she had an image of margaret <from dennis the menace> jumping up with
glee on them, and margaret was saying "someday there will be a woman president"
wallmart sold the tshirts, until a customer complained. so wallmart
took the shirts off the shelves and gave the woman who sold the sshirts
the explanation of "it offends family values".


#69 of 114 by headdoc on Sun Oct 1 22:06:05 1995:

That offends me!!  I'm surprised I haven't heard about this.  If I see it in
print, I will dash off a letter to the Walmart pres. telling him how I feel
about the action.


#70 of 114 by omni on Mon Oct 2 05:37:20 1995:

  It was pretty senseless to me as well. I would like to know what particular
family value is being threatened by a woman running for president or any
office for that matter.


#71 of 114 by iggy on Mon Oct 2 14:38:54 1995:

well, i forgot her name. she was interviewed on one of those morning
'news' shows. um.. i think it was 'the today show'.


#72 of 114 by iggy on Tue Oct 3 13:14:55 1995:

ok, the city was mirmar <i dont know how it was spelled> florida.
and i just heard that now wal;lmart reversed itself and apologized
for pulling the shirt in the first place.
hmm.. do you think if they get another complaint, they will
reverse themselves AGAIN and pull the shirt AGAIN?


#73 of 114 by excel on Wed Jan 14 16:25:06 1998:

I feel Vallerie Mates is very much excited about Tampoons.


#74 of 114 by valerie on Wed Jan 14 18:00:06 1998:

This response has been erased.



#75 of 114 by headdoc on Wed Jan 14 22:59:46 1998:

Valerie, I think it may be a cultural misunderstanding.


#76 of 114 by keesan on Fri Jan 16 00:22:03 1998:

In some civilized parts of the world, women use cotton batting (the type
sold wrapped in blue paper at the drug store, sterilized), a small ball
just sort of stuffed in externally.  No problems with toxic shock, less
chance of nighttime leakage than pads, and you can back it up with a
minipad.  A piece of toilet paper (large piece) bunched up will also work,
but not as long, in case you want to try out the idea without having to
buy batting first.  These wads of cotton batting are flushable, have no
added chemicals that I know of, and probably won't cause rashes.  The
rashes from pads are, I would guess, more of a problem when the pads
become wet than if they are just used as a backup.  Instead of batting you
can use small pieces of old sheet and then compost them (or trash them, if
you must), rather than bothering to launder them, but they are nowhere
near as absorbent as the batting.
.




#77 of 114 by birdlady on Sat Jan 17 10:31:23 1998:

Actually, that's how pads were invented, I do believe.  During WWII, nurses
discovered that by wadding up the cotton batting and gauze they used for
wounded soldiers, they could absorb menstrual fluid quicker and neater.


#78 of 114 by iggy on Sun Jan 18 16:18:28 1998:

there now is a similar product out now, but i cant
remember the name.
it appears to be formed <cotton?> fiber that fits
between the labia and collects fluid there. 
it is recommended you also use a panty liner of sorts.
havent tried it yet.


#79 of 114 by faile on Wed Mar 3 05:18:32 1999:

There's an interesting new product out there called "Instead" that is a 
plastic cup that sits much like a diaphragm at the top of the vagina, 
and collects menstral fluid.  They say it can be worn up to twelve 
hours, twice as long as a tampon, and it has the added advantage that it 
can be worn durring sex.  (But it DOES NOT act as a contreceptive.  It 
is very important to use a form of protection if you want to make sure 
you don't get pregnant.)  

It has some of the same risks as tampons as far as TSS is concerned, 
obviously.  But the incidence is low, as with tampons.  Another problem 
is that some women find it difficult to remove.  (After all the point is 
not to make a mess all over yourself and your hands)  Also, in women who 
find that tampons make their cramps worse, this is still, usually the 
case with Instead.  

I've used them, and I rather like them-- it is a little more convinent 
that tampons, as they don't need to be changed as often.  But, I don't 
wear them at the start of my period, because, like just about all 
tampons, they make my cramps worse.  It is a little more tedious to 
carry around, simply because they're larger than tampons (after all, if 
one uses aplicator-less tampons, 2 will fit conviently in a jeans 
pocket.)

Anyway, I was wondering if anyone else has used these, and if so, what 
they thought.  (and that's why I'm reviving an item that's been dead for 
over a year.)


#80 of 114 by beeswing on Fri Mar 5 05:23:39 1999:

i tried them. could not get them inserted properly for anything.


#81 of 114 by mta on Sun Apr 4 16:01:26 1999:

If they make cramps worse, I think I'll pass.


#82 of 114 by faile on Sun Apr 4 18:40:21 1999:

They make my cramps worse... but so do just about all tampons I've tried. 
About the only thing that has made my cramps better is a day of bed rest and
heavy duty pain killers.

So if you don't have a problem with tampons.... *shrug*  I have a friend who
swears by the things and doesn't use anything else....
who knows...


#83 of 114 by mta on Sat Apr 10 01:14:40 1999:

Tampons give me agony -- even the teeny tiny, you'll never know it's there
kind.


#84 of 114 by jiffer on Tue Jun 8 21:49:23 1999:

Ugh,  I can;t stand tampons, they make me dry, and my body tends to reject
them.  So I stick with the pad.  .


#85 of 114 by mooncat on Tue Jun 8 22:28:41 1999:

I just hate the "you won't feel them" thing... Cause I can.  Even the
little ones... but I do use them when I want to swim and I have my
period.



#86 of 114 by gypsi on Wed Jun 9 00:33:22 1999:

Once they get a bit full, they start to come out, and that hurts.  Other than
that, I don't really feel them since I always make sure I get them *past* the
vaginal muscles in the front.  I pretty much put it in until it hits, then
push the applicator so that it retracts on the tampon...I don't pull on the
applicator.  I like them when I'm swimming or working since pads are annoying
when you're sweating or even warm.  I guess it really depends on what I'm in
the mood for.  I hate it in general.  When's menopause?  I'm ready to end
this.  ;-)


#87 of 114 by mooncat on Wed Jun 9 12:42:48 1999:

<grins> Kids or menopause, Sarah... <grins> If you want the first you'll
have to be willing to wait for the second.

They don't really hurt... I can just tell they're there, and that makes
me uncomfy.



#88 of 114 by beeswing on Wed Jun 9 14:25:53 1999:

They don't bother me. I just avoid the "mega-super-absorbency" variety.

Cardboard applicators I hate. They "catch" and I cannot get them to 
budge. 


#89 of 114 by jiffer on Wed Jun 9 18:45:01 1999:

I know what you mean Bees, most of the time I do use pads except for 
swimming and biking.  

I also hate pads that have the pastic as the top layer, nothing like 
plastic sticking to the skin.  And I am starting to notice that it is 
difficult to find the paper or tissue pads that keep well together and 
absorb.
.


#90 of 114 by swa on Sun Aug 22 21:40:06 1999:

I've heard that diaphragms have also been linked to TSS.  The impression I
get is that it's very unlikely unless you leave it in for far too long, but
I was curious as to whether anyone knows anything about this.

Where do all of you find information about women's reproductive health issues?
I would like to know more about many of the things discussed here, but
things like tampon safety, TSS, endometriosis, etc. rarely seem to be
discussed in the media.  Any good online resources?  I'd like to feel more
well-informed than I currently am about my own body...



#91 of 114 by happyboy on Sun Aug 22 22:26:45 1999:

that's it!  a new pr superhero!

TAMPON SAFETY MAN!

/emote puts on his tights, and TSM tanktop


#92 of 114 by jiffer on Mon Aug 23 03:23:27 1999:

some of the best places are either bbses, web sites and even the companies
that make the pads and tampons as well.


#93 of 114 by gypsi on Mon Aug 23 19:18:21 1999:

Your gyno should have some literature in their office, too.  There are some
good resources online, but you have to be very careful since not all of them
are true medical sites.


#94 of 114 by orinoco on Tue Aug 24 17:01:41 1999:

(Okay, admittedly I have no experience on this topic, but I find it surprising
that jiffer lists the companies themselves as a good source of info.  Do you
really find that the information they give is trustworthy?)


#95 of 114 by jiffer on Tue Aug 24 18:10:41 1999:

The companies do not want to be sued, so it is to their benefit to tell you
about TSS and how to prevent it.  I went to Tampons' and always' sites, and
they do have pages where they talk about it.  Check them out.

http://tampax.com

is one example.


#96 of 114 by swa on Wed Aug 25 03:06:24 1999:

I shall explore.  Thank you.


#97 of 114 by faile on Fri Aug 27 00:47:41 1999:

I'm going to shout out my personal fave reproductive health site:
plannedparenthood.org
It doesn't deal a lot with menstural issues, but they have awsome info on
contrecetives, and a couple other women's health issues that are just great.


#98 of 114 by vanessa on Fri May 31 03:20:09 2002:

I recommend visiting the museum of menstruation website at 
http://www.mum.org/.  Personally, I just started experimenting 
with "the Keeper" which is a reusable menstrual cup.  It is similar to 
the Instead but has some key design differences.  I have only used it 
during light days but it went really well.  I understand there is a 
learning curve though (re: leakage problems), but there is a support e-
mail list to help trouble-shoot problems.    


#99 of 114 by buddy on Wed Jul 31 01:00:20 2002:

Okay i just saw this item on the list and it really appealed to me.I read all
the responses and decided that i should respond to this item. At first when
i started having periods at 14, i was using pads until about 5 months ago.
I am very happy that i made the switch and i have one person to thank for
it,my sister rachel.I am happy for the following reasons that i made the
switch: 1.they're more comfortable. 2.they're more sanitary. 3.they're easier
to dispose of. 4.they're more absorbent. I have tried 2 brands to see which
i would like better (tampax & playtex) and i liked playtex better. They are
very comfortable, and very easy to insert.


#100 of 114 by michaela on Wed Jul 31 01:43:25 2002:

Yay!!!  Always has come out with pads designed for women who are over a size
14!  This means I don't have to play the "how far forward/back do I put this
thing?" game.  Yay, Always!!!  Now to put them to the test and see if this
alleviates front/back leaks.

(Yes, they have wings)


#101 of 114 by edina on Wed Jul 31 15:25:52 2002:

I am well over a size 14 and I have *never* had a problem before - I can
assure you - I won't be buying plus-sized pads.


#102 of 114 by mynxcat on Wed Jul 31 16:16:31 2002:

This response has been erased.



#103 of 114 by jiffer on Thu Aug 1 15:53:02 2002:

Actually, I have always thought of it as a flow issue... I have a heavy
period when not on the pill, so I always wear the overnight types (which are
long and wide), and I get the cottony dry, ultra thin kinds... they work
well.. even if I still have to change them every 1-2 hours....


#104 of 114 by michaela on Sat Aug 3 01:27:22 2002:

Re #102: My mom warned me that wearing tampons might hurt at first since I
was a virgin when I first started wearing them.  She didn't see the
possibility of a tampon breaking my hymen as ruining my virginity.  She was
more worried about a boy doing that.  :)


#105 of 114 by mynxcat on Sat Aug 3 07:50:29 2002:

This response has been erased.



#106 of 114 by slynne on Sun Aug 4 18:58:08 2002:

I am a plus size women and have found that lots of brands make "longs" 
so it isnt that Always is doing something new. They just have the good 
sense to market the things to us fat women. 


#107 of 114 by michaela on Mon Aug 5 05:20:49 2002:

Even the longs are kinda iffy.  I think the big problem is that my job
requires me to get in and out of a car 20-25 times per night, bend, squat,
and twist.  This is why tampons are a blessing.  :)


#108 of 114 by slynne on Mon Aug 5 16:19:43 2002:

Oh yeah, I have to wear tampons while at work but they arent very 
comfortable so at home, it is a whole 'nuther story. 


#109 of 114 by vanessa on Tue Aug 6 12:41:54 2002:

Oh, and I recently found out about a silicone version of the keeper 
called a mooncup.  http://www.mooncup.co.uk/  I think I will stick with 
what I have though.  I am even happier now than when I first posted on 
this thread in May.  I used to wear tampons and sometimes tampons+pads 
(an always brand fan as well :-) but I don't think I'm ever going 
back.  I have had no problems with leakage from the cup and although 
tampons were tolerable most of the time I experienced leakage and 
dryness problems that were very annoying.  The keeper seems to work 
better for me.  


#110 of 114 by mta on Wed Aug 21 19:48:02 2002:

I may have a look at the new Always pads to see if they work for me ... but
several years ago I gave up on pads entirely and went to Depends.  OK, so they
aren't marketed for that use, but they hold plenty, they have elasticized legs
and they *never* leak.  I had gotten so tired of using three pads -- one in
front, one in back, and one across the middle, and then finding that I had
blood stained the furniture and my clothes ... but the pads had slipped out of
the way and were quite clean.  <bleah>





#111 of 114 by slynne on Sun Aug 25 19:36:24 2002:

Arent the Depends kind of expensive. I have thought about getting some 
for nighttime. I suppose they are cheaper than ruining sheets!


#112 of 114 by mta on Thu Sep 19 11:49:29 2002:

I don't find them unreasonably expensive ... especially when counted against
all the ruined clothes and extra laundry they prevent...but that would have to
be based on yourt budget.  ;)


#113 of 114 by sarahlee on Tue May 20 14:06:07 2003:

This thread is mighty old, but I thought I'd post anyway. :)
I can't stand pads. I loathe them. *laugh* I'm definitely a tampon fan, 
specifically OB tampons, applicator free. They are shorter than other 
tampons, and they expand around instead of getting wider at one point 
or longer. I cramp less with tampons, and my periods are shorter, which 
is really good, since my periods last between 5 and 7 days. I've never 
leaked with OB tampons. 

*laugh* I sound like a commercial!

I would only use something other than OB in a real emergency. 


#114 of 114 by slynne on Tue May 20 19:48:28 2003:

Well, O.B. tampons are the best. That is for sure. I prefer the kind 
with the applicator but have been having a hard time finding them 
lately. Luckily drugstore.com has them. ;) I like the kind without 
applicators for when I am out someplace because they fit so well in a 
pocket. 


I have leaked with OB tampons but only rarely. They are definitely the 
best ones as far as leaks go. 


You have several choices: