Grex Laundry Conference

Item 3: Detergents

Entered by omni on Thu Apr 13 05:02:25 1995:

  

   What is your favorite detergent?

   I for one, use Tide Free, and I love the way it works,
54 responses total.

#1 of 54 by mcpoz on Thu Apr 13 10:23:10 1995:

I guess I would vote for Tide because "way back when" I was working with
detergents, Tide was the benchmark product, against which others measured
themselves.


#2 of 54 by darling on Sat Apr 15 15:12:10 1995:

and to think that now there are only about 10,000 products out there that claim
to be the best...


#3 of 54 by mcpoz on Sat Apr 15 19:26:58 1995:

True, but at least in past years, Tide was measureably better than anything
on the market.  We used a "Launder-o-Meter" which gave a standard wash cycle
carefully controlled.  The results were measured several ways, but whiteness
was measured on a Reflect-o-meter using standard reflectance methods.  Part
of the success of a product is its proprietary "Whiteners, or Brightners" 
and another part is its "suspending agents."  The whiteners tend to be UV
fluorescing agents and mask (hide) yellowing.  The suspending angents are
a hodgepodge of polymers and they tend to have more affinity for suspended
soils than does the fabric.

I believe that the makers of Tide put heavy duty $$$$ into R & D.


#4 of 54 by omni on Sun Apr 16 03:23:10 1995:

 Just out of curiousity, where did you work, Marc?


#5 of 54 by mcpoz on Sun Apr 16 13:37:42 1995:

I did an early stint at J.B. Ford Division of Wyandotte Chemicals Co.
(That was before it was BASF Wyandotte)


#6 of 54 by brenda on Mon Apr 17 14:08:26 1995:

Consumer Reports rated Tide with bleach alternative best this month.
The other "flavors" of Tide rated in the top 5 or 10 also.

Must be Tide really *is* better.  ;)


#7 of 54 by mcpoz on Mon Apr 17 17:37:30 1995:

It was the best in the past, & I'd bet it is among the best now.


#8 of 54 by omni on Tue Apr 18 06:09:18 1995:

 As f-w of this conf, I hereby declare Tide to be the official detergent
of the Laundry conference. Any objections?


#9 of 54 by rcurl on Tue Apr 18 06:12:45 1995:

Yes. We must argue about it for a long time first. Besides, we don't
use Tide, and I would not feel welcome here if the Tide runs against
me.


#10 of 54 by omni on Tue Apr 18 19:35:35 1995:

 Fair enough, debate shall continue.


#11 of 54 by headdoc on Wed Apr 19 14:52:28 1995:

Well, you had just better change your ways, Rane, or you will never come
clean.


#12 of 54 by rcurl on Wed Apr 19 16:21:56 1995:

I'll come clean: I have the book _Synthetic Detergents_ (Davidson and
Milwidsky), and it doesn't even mention Tide. Would you be interested
in TAED instead?


#13 of 54 by mcpoz on Thu Apr 20 01:38:50 1995:

Debate it is!  (BTW we use Cheer Free)


#14 of 54 by omni on Thu Apr 20 05:19:13 1995:

re 12- I'd like to read that someday. I'm still interested in the 
chemistry of laundry stuff.


#15 of 54 by mwarner on Sat Apr 22 04:00:58 1995:

3 Cheers for free and clear.  Perfumes/dyes make me itch.  %0-##<



#16 of 54 by maahoc on Sun Apr 23 05:38:20 1995:

personally I use what[D[Dever is on sale!!!!


#17 of 54 by popcorn on Tue Apr 25 03:20:06 1995:

This response has been erased.



#18 of 54 by mcpoz on Wed Apr 26 00:09:57 1995:

See, I told you!


#19 of 54 by zook on Wed Apr 26 01:17:44 1995:

Which was the one that was "brighter than bright" (or "whiter than white").
One of my chem profs told me they spiked that one with stuff that absorbed
ultraviolet and emitted in the visible spectrum (so their claim was indeed
true).


#20 of 54 by rcurl on Wed Apr 26 06:14:31 1995:

All (to my knowledge) detergent products include "whiteners", which
flouresce. (Visit a flourescent mineral exhibit some time, and check your
white clothes). I would also say, that detergent products consist of
nothing but "spikes": they are mixtures of many chemicals each of which
serves a particular function (in conjunction with the others). 



#21 of 54 by mcpoz on Thu Apr 27 01:01:43 1995:

It is common to add fluorescing agents to detergents.  These agents 
give off a bluish-white to greenish-white light when exposed to UV.  I remember
the advertising slogan "whiter than white" but can not recall the product.


#22 of 54 by popcorn on Tue May 2 22:55:19 1995:

This response has been erased.



#23 of 54 by rcurl on Wed May 3 07:23:31 1995:

That's OK: I bake my cakes with fluor.


#24 of 54 by mcpoz on Sun Jul 2 11:11:11 1995:

I was at the top of the park last night (taking photos by the way) and I saw
a guy with a jacket with a full size Tide logo.  The whole jacket made him
look like a box of Tide with legs, arms, and a head.  


#25 of 54 by popcorn on Wed Dec 27 15:05:45 1995:

This response has been erased.



#26 of 54 by mcpoz on Wed Dec 27 19:36:25 1995:

Good Stuff!


#27 of 54 by otter on Sat Dec 30 01:00:06 1995:

ref #24: didja get a good shot of him?
OK, you all have convinced me. I am going to try Tide Free, but if I get a
rash on my delicate parts you are all taking a dip in an icy river,
compliments of the Itchy Otter.


#28 of 54 by mcpoz on Sat Dec 30 02:19:20 1995:

No, for some reason it never occured to me to take his picture.  Lost
opportunity.


#29 of 54 by orinoco on Sat Nov 15 23:01:10 1997:

Wow...this conference really _is_ about laundry, isn't it?!
Amazing...


#30 of 54 by rcurl on Sun Nov 16 03:05:03 1997:

And, what were you expecting, dirty secrets maybe?


#31 of 54 by orinoco on Wed Nov 19 03:46:58 1997:

That's what I'd assumed from the description - a place to come clean... :)


#32 of 54 by snowth on Sat Nov 29 21:59:51 1997:

Well, gee, orin, you should've said something. I knew that for a long time!
(Dan's the ditz! Dan's the ditz! Teehee! Snowth isn't clueless for once!)


#33 of 54 by orinoco on Sun Nov 30 03:50:39 1997:

Hi....my name is Dan, and I've got a problem.  I....I...I'm a...ditz!  <sob>

How's that for dirty secrets?


#34 of 54 by i on Sun Nov 30 14:41:32 1997:

Wash cold with plenty of Tide and a *very* small amount of Chlorox
(about 2 oz for a full-size washer).  Drip dry, do not wring, and
you should be okay.  Try gentle cycle on the wash at first.


#35 of 54 by mta on Mon Dec 1 00:44:57 1997:

I confess.  I'm a Tide user, too.  I realy love clothes and I discovered a
long time ago that of all the detergents I tried (and I tried a lot of them)
Tide made the biggest difference in how clean my clothes seems at folding
time.

That was enough for me.


#36 of 54 by keesan on Mon Jan 5 23:36:34 1998:

We bought a 50 gallon drum of the powder (sodium alpha olefin sulfonate) that
is the basic ingredient of most detergents, and use it together with a water
softener (ours has phosphate, but you can use washing soda - sodium
carbonate).  We figure a gallon of the liquid, mixed to the same concentration
as commercial detergents, cost us 50 cents.  We have been selling it to
friends for a dollar (to account for inflation since we bought it tenn years
ago).  It also works fine on dishes.  No bluing agents,
anti-deposition-agents, bleaches, enzymes or anything else in it.  Our white
shirts are gradually getting grayer, but we don't care.  We wash clothing when
it looks or smells dirty, and this stuff gets out what we care about.  (The
grey may be because we wash in cold water and the calcium and magnesium
combine with the detergent and precipitate out on the clothing.  A hot water
wash with softener removes a lot of this grey).  If anyone is interested, I
can pass on a sample and look up the address of the Detroit distributor.  A
major advantage is the complete lack of added fragrance, and you can't smell
the active ingredient.  It also has no peanut shells added for bulk, or
coloring agents.  We have a different product for shampoo/soap (actually I
think the formula above was the shampoo, the detergent has a benzene ring in
it.)  Biodegradable, made in Chicago.


#37 of 54 by gibson on Sat Jan 10 04:33:06 1998:

        Is anyone familiar with laundry discs? They're 3/ $50.00, replace
detergent completely and last something like 1000 washes? I've read they
work but hate to spend $50.00 to experiment.


#38 of 54 by rcurl on Sat Jan 10 06:01:53 1998:

They don't work. Try washing without detergents at all. You will get the
same effect for much less money.


#39 of 54 by mta on Sat Jan 10 21:47:29 1998:

Is this from experience or reason, Rane?  ;)



#40 of 54 by rcurl on Sun Jan 11 08:02:07 1998:

It is what has been reported by people trying them out. Also, logic tells
you that they can't do anything any other lump of anything in the wash
could do, since they add nothing to the wash. So, it is from the experience
of others plus reason.


#41 of 54 by keesan on Mon Jan 12 04:42:57 1998:

See alternative water softeners item in environment conference.  We have a
friend who just received some of these disks for Christmas and might be
willing to lend them out.  His mother likes them.  As I wrote in under water
softeners, they may have something to do with preventing crystallization of
calcium carbonate by magnetizing the dissolved iron in the water, assuming
that they work.  I have never seen or used them myself, and could find nothing
on the Internet.  If your clothing is not very dirty, you may be able to just
wash with washing soda, which will react with any grease in the laundry to
form soap, which will help to get out any remaining grease.  (Hot water and/or
a long soak would help with the reaction).  Try about 1/4 - 1/2 cup soda. 
It is very cheap and nontoxic and will not hurt the environment, but you might
want to keep it off your skin as it is drying, sort of alike a very mild form
of lye.  Washing soda is sodium carbonate, will not cause algae to grow, or
hurt most fabrics.  (Don't use on wool or silk).  Soap is formed when an
alkali (such as lye, potash from wood ashes, or sodium carbonate) splits up
a fat molecule (which consists of glycerol and three fatty acids) into
glycerol and three sodium-plus-fatty acids, one end of which is soluble in
water, and the other in fat.


#42 of 54 by rcurl on Mon Jan 12 08:08:33 1998:

There is no effect of magnetism on the crystallization of calcium carbonate
and iron ions (ferric or ferrous) are not magnetic and, if they were, that
would have no affect upon calcium carbonate precipitation. These 
"explanations" are all hand-waving and pseudo science.

However keesan is correct in describing sodium carbonate, soaps and fatty
acids, etc. Sodium carbonate is often a component of detergents (as sold
in the box, these are all mixtures), though its function is primarily to
precipitate calcium carbonate and bulk out the product. The detergents
do the actual grease removal.


#43 of 54 by keesan on Mon Jan 12 16:47:31 1998:

Magnetite is magnetic.  Sodium carbonate reacts with fats to form soap, which
is a detergent, as well as serving as a water softener.  That is why is dries
out your skin, it removes the fats by converting them to soap.


#44 of 54 by rcurl on Mon Jan 12 21:10:15 1998:

Magnetite is not in solution as ions. It is a solid and would have no
affect upon calcium carbonate precipitation. 

There is a technical distinction between soaps and detergents. The former
are all alkali metal salts of fatty acids, while the latter are not, but
any of a very large variety of (mostly synthetic) substances that have
hydrophilic and hydrophobic sections of their molecules. 


#45 of 54 by keesan on Mon Jan 12 22:43:16 1998:

We will ask our friend who owns the laundry 'crystals' to see if they are
magnetic.
While looking on the Internet for a combination washer-dryer I found Nadior
Corp., Ltd., British, which is developing technology for a microwave dryer
and an ultrasonic washer, which they plan eventually to combine as one unit.
I am sorry, I could not find anything on magnet-type water softeners on the
Internet.  Ultrasonic washers are used in hospitals, don't know what they look
like or do.
I wonder if the 'crystals' are just sodium carbonate?  Or perhaps concentrated
detergent?  You really need very little to get laundry clean, we use a pinch
of the actual detergent (no additives) plus some water softener, so maybe they
are just selling you $50 worth of detergent.  Who knows.


#46 of 54 by keesan on Mon Jan 12 23:49:38 1998:

Rane, I would be interested to see your book on Synthetic Detergents.  I had
done some research before we bought our 50 gal drum of sodium alkylbenzene
sulfonate (a synthetic detergent).  Shampoos are sodium alpha olefin sulfonate
or sodium lauryl sulfate.  (The latter turns to a gel at our winter room
temperature).  MacMillan Dictionary defines detergent as any cleansing agent,
esp. one made synthetically and resemblling soap in its cleansing action but
not in its chemical composition.  Soap has a -COO- group at the end of the
long straight-chain hydrocarbon, wherease the synthetic detergents (note that
soap is a natural detergent) have -SOO3-, which makes them work better in hard
water.  (Can you tell us why?)  The benzyl group I think adds to the charge
on the SOO3-, making it more polar, so that the benzenesulfonate detergents
are stronger, and therefore not used on skin or hair but on clothing and
dishes.  They will work if you like dry hair and skin.  


#47 of 54 by rcurl on Tue Jan 13 07:44:16 1998:

I will post the reference when I'm in my office.
"Detergent" is used non-technically for almost any cleaning agent, but as
you found, it refers "esp. one made synthetically". 

The alkaline earth (calcium and magnesium in particularly) salts of fatty
acids are insoluble in water, requiring softening agents in soap mixtures.
The alkaline earth salts of sulfonates, and other ionic detergent radicals,
are soluble. There are also non-ionic detergents, which are more expensive,
but work at any pH (soaps, sulfonates and similar ionic detergents will
usually not work in acid solutions). 


#48 of 54 by orinoco on Tue Jan 20 04:32:19 1998:

<wonders what a microwave drier would do when confronted with zippers>


#49 of 54 by i on Wed Jan 21 00:41:25 1998:

Zippers probably wouldn't matter.  (Though i'd suggest leaving them
unzipped.)  An underwire bra could easily catch fire, though.


#50 of 54 by rcurl on Wed Jan 21 21:32:53 1998:

Re #46: A. S. Davidsohn & B. Milwidsky, _Synthetic Detergents_, 7th ed.,
Longman Sci. & Tech (Wiley and Sons, New York), 1987.


#51 of 54 by keesan on Wed Jan 28 02:04:17 1998:

Re 49-50, there does not appear to actually be any microwave drier.


From armand.gilinsky@sonoma.edu Tue Jan 27 20:54:26 1998
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 1998 13:33:36 -0800
From: Armand Gilinsky <armand.gilinsky@sonoma.edu>
To: "C. Keesan" <keesan@cyberspace.org>
Subject: Re: Nadior Corp. Ltd washer/

                      RE>Nadior Corp. Ltd washer/dryer             1/27/98

Sorry, this was a disguised case study for academic purposes only.  I am
afraid that I cannot get you any more information.
Armand Gilinsky

--------------------------------------
Date: 1/23/98 12:45
To: Armand Gilinsky
From: C. Keesan
While looking for information on a combination washer-dryer (one
case, not stacked), I ran across mention of Nadior's plans for an ultra
sonic washer and microwave dryer.  Where can I get more information?  
Several of us (via a local bbs) would appreciate details, and would
in particular like to know what happens to metal zippers and underwire bras in
a micro
wave environment.  DO you have an e-mail address or website for Nadior?
C. Keesan (Keesan.@grex.org).  Many thanks.






#52 of 54 by bjorn on Sat Jul 18 14:50:44 1998:

Dreft is about the only Detergent that doesn't make my clothes irritate me.


#53 of 54 by keesan on Sat Jul 18 23:24:53 1998:

Bjorn, if you are really sensitive to detergents, we have one that will
probably not bother you, it is a single ingredient that we got from the
factory in a 50 pound drum.


#54 of 54 by bjorn on Mon Jul 20 02:15:17 1998:

Well, it's also good for washing my diapers.


You have several choices: