Grex Systems Conference

Item 70: Microsoft rolls out "Vista"

Entered by richard on Tue Jan 30 18:21:20 2007:

93 new of 203 responses total.


#111 of 203 by twenex on Sat Feb 3 22:59:25 2007:

I agree that hardware and software monopolies are attractive, but not in the
way they are implemented. It would be perfectly possible, for example, for
Linux to be a monopoly - and yet (unless MS manages to pwn it due to their
patent threats and deal with Novell) the effect would not be the same since
there are many companies involved in its production.

Just like we have now with the Intel (actually AMD) architecture, but lots
of PC companies.


#112 of 203 by keesan on Sun Feb 4 03:51:00 2007:

My linux boots in 15 sec on a small drive.


#113 of 203 by tsty on Wed Feb 14 09:01:26 2007:

you pay micro$chmidt lotss-0-bukxx to beta=test their nwe os. 
  
hmmmmmmmmmmm
  
i think i;ll wait ... as usual
  
but the, i donlt have clients who demand to be on teh bleeding edge either!
  
in fact, one client of minme (fact!) wnast me to upgrade him to dos 6.22 (from
6.0) and to windoeze 3.11 (from 3.0).

his 386sx b0x works perfectly fro *him* ! and that makes us both happy.
pthbbbb!



#114 of 203 by easlern on Wed Feb 14 14:01:52 2007:

What convinced him it was time to upgrade his space heater?


#115 of 203 by maus on Thu Feb 15 00:51:47 2007:

Keesan, 15 seconds is mighty fast. What distribution and version, and on
what platform? What you say it boots, do you mean that it finishes the
initrd or that at 15 seconds, you get your dtlogin/xdm ? 


#116 of 203 by keesan on Thu Feb 15 02:47:55 2007:

I use loadlin to boot from a DOS directory with the kernel in it.  I don't
get any dtlogin/xdm.  I get vt1 (console, text).  15 sec is on a small hard
drive.  If it has to check a larger one it can take longer.  Basiclinux 3.40,
Slackware based.  On a 486 or later.  I could also boot with lilo directly
from power-on which might take a few seconds longer, and depends on the
computer . Some take that long to check their memory.  Basiclinux does not
start any daemons.  No random number generators.  No X, no GUIs - add those
later after booting if you want them.


#117 of 203 by maus on Thu Feb 15 03:37:47 2007:

Wow, that's spartan. I guess I am spoiled; I like to have at least X and
Motif  or something like CDE or GNOME or something on my workstation,
and on servers obviously daemons will need to be run. Now that I think
about it, I don't think I even have any drives small enough to be
checked in 15 seconds.


#118 of 203 by keesan on Thu Feb 15 03:48:06 2007:

This linux can be run off two floppy disks, or you can put it into an ext2
partition.  I got several browsers and a few other things into 40MB, including
Opera and I think Abiword.  I have been setting up friends for internet.  No
crashes, quick boot, Opera for email, or webmail.  No WIndows viruses.  I
checked and no linux viruses either in 4 years, probably because I don't run
any servers.  The 2-floppy version has X with swm, and xli, and a text browser
with xli for viewing images non-inline.  Dialer, telnet, wget, ftpput, etc.
I set up friends to go right into X with a menu (icewm).  120MB was fine for
linux and also 60 DOS games with space to spare.  We usually use 340 or 500MB
drives because they are faster.  16MB is best but 3MB is minimal.


#119 of 203 by maus on Thu Feb 15 04:21:04 2007:

That certainly serves a different niche than what we need. We typically
look for something that works in a networked environment, is supported
(or at least supportable) and that works with modern hardware. 

While they are not the speediest in the world, I've been fairly thrilled
by both SLED and RHEL; both are well behaved, well supported, reliable
and featureful.

Of course, on my workstation at the Dallas DC, I run OpenBSD 3.9 with
mwm as my working GUI environment.


#120 of 203 by keesan on Thu Feb 15 15:32:10 2007:

My linux works in a networked environment.  You add pieces as you need them.
I never heard of SLED or RHEL.


#121 of 203 by maus on Thu Feb 15 17:08:43 2007:

SLED is SuSE Linux Enterprise Desktop
RHEL is Red Hat Enterprise Linux

What is the time commitment to tweaking it to useability? Are you able
to be notified of updates and automagically apply them?
up2date/yum/zmd/zen-updater are really nice and save me loads of time
and aggrivation. 


#122 of 203 by keesan on Thu Feb 15 22:17:32 2007:

There are no 'updates'.  The author and the users compile things and offer
them to others for use.  I compiled lynx and ghostcript and netpbm, all with
help, and packaged them.  Anyone who feels like it adds whatever they like
and if it does not work, asks for help.  xpdf did not work with libc5 X so
I figured out how to get pdftoppm to work instead, used with zgv.  Someone
put together for me a 1-floppy version to use with my USB camera.  I put
together an 8MB loop version to put ON my USB camera (on the memory card).
Someone else used the 1-floppy version to learn on then I compiled a special
kernel for them to run linux in 8MB ramdisk for use in Prague.  They put
together mutt and sound packages for us.  Another list member and I are going
to compile busybox against uclibc.  He just compiled uclibc and made me an
account on his computer.  This is not a turnkey sort of linux.  


#123 of 203 by maus on Thu Feb 15 23:32:39 2007:

That sounds like a lot of fun for a hobbyist who has more time than
anything else. At some point, when I have the time, I may check it out,
but I will say that it is ill suited for the use that I make of Linux
(or any other OS+Software stack). When I have machines that I or others
count on, I cannot rely on some guy in usenet; I have to have solutions
that are backed by a company with a financial incentive to do things
right, whether that is to keep software patched and automatically
available, or to provide well-integrated and thoroughly tested useful
software. If a security patch is not available because the user
community does not think the software is hip, my users are put at risk.
Patch management becomes extra important when you have a large number of
internet-facing computers; the one system that you forget to manually
patch can be the toe-hold for a malicious intruder or for rot and
entropy to set in. 


#124 of 203 by nharmon on Fri Feb 16 00:51:10 2007:

The only reason I've come across for running SLED or RHES is to get
support from Oracle (and probably other software vendors). Otherwise,
CentOS is great. :)


#125 of 203 by maus on Fri Feb 16 03:20:45 2007:

Support for the OS and bundled apps is important, too. That said, for
home use, I do go for CentOS/OpenSuse/Windows Server Basic


#126 of 203 by keesan on Fri Feb 16 04:02:03 2007:

Our little linux is for single users, not companies.  The only support is our
ibiblio mailing list.  We have currently active members in New Zealand
(author), Australia (two), all over the United States, Prague, Lithuania, and
have had Poland, England, France, Spain, Hong Kong, Nigeria, Germany,
Netherlands, Sweden, Argentina, and who knows where else.  Lots of lurkers.
Several of us learned linux via the list.


#127 of 203 by twenex on Fri Feb 16 13:30:03 2007:

There are more Linuxes available for single users or households and not for
companies than just basiclinux.

Ubuntu, for example, though I've never been Uber-impressed w/ it.


#128 of 203 by cross on Fri Feb 16 13:55:06 2007:

Ubuntu is certainly used in some companies!


#129 of 203 by keesan on Fri Feb 16 15:37:09 2007:

Ubuntu does not work (out of the box) on much of our hardware.  It insisted
on 128MB RAM and 2GB (to install to) and could not find the ISA modem or sound
card.  Dumped you right into X (I had trouble figuring out how to get back
out).  Did not have kermit or opera or zgv.  We got it to dial once by
manually configuring and removed it.


#130 of 203 by cross on Fri Feb 16 16:47:24 2007:

What you do is pathological.


#131 of 203 by keesan on Fri Feb 16 17:28:55 2007:

Cross, please stop picking on me.  If what I write annoys you, put me in your
twit filter instead.


#132 of 203 by nharmon on Fri Feb 16 17:37:10 2007:

Some of us wouldn't get anything done if we had to put as much time into
it as Sindi does.


#133 of 203 by cross on Fri Feb 16 19:58:20 2007:

Regarding #131; I'm not picking on you. I'm just saying that what you do is
pathologically different from what the vast majority of Ubuntu users do.  I
don't understand why you'd pitch in about what business users do anyway, since
you're so far removed from that case that it's silly.  Btw- in Computer
Science, the word `pathological' does not have the same meaning it has in
criminal justice.

You should also learn to use paragraphs.


#134 of 203 by keesan on Fri Feb 16 23:34:48 2007:

So what does pathological mean in computer science?


#135 of 203 by cross on Fri Feb 16 23:50:50 2007:

Essentially, pushed to an extreme.  So, for instance, some times we say that
algorithms exhibit `pathological behavior' if we hit some sort of edge case
that greatly increases the algorithm's running time or something of that
nature.


#136 of 203 by easlern on Sat Feb 17 00:04:52 2007:

Counter to understanding maybe? Patho = abnormal and logos = knowledge I
think.


#137 of 203 by mcnally on Sat Feb 17 00:54:21 2007:

 It's a good thing cross didn't use another, related term to describe
 Sindi's behavior.  But the insult potential of describing someone
 else as "the degenerate case" would be pretty unmistakable, even if
 it wasn't meant in a critical sense.


#138 of 203 by cross on Sat Feb 17 04:18:10 2007:

Hmm, I tend not to think of it like that.  For instance, when someone says,
``the pathological case of quicksort'' one is typically referring to an input
that gives an O(n^2) running time (ie, one that is quadratic in the size of
the input).  Rather, that's the worst case running time for a pathological
input.


#139 of 203 by maus on Sat Feb 17 06:32:54 2007:

I will say that it seems to me that keesan exerts more effort than it
would be worth to the majority of Linux/BSD users to get a working
system, and that the hardware on which keesan does this costs
significantly more in having to fiddle with it than it would to replace
with something more recent and more supportable (one for which
replacement parts can be obtained easily and which the OEM has not
disavowed). 

This is not to say that everyone should dump their older machines, but
there is a threshold age beyond which a machine demands more effort than
it is worth. I lump 32bit Sparcstations, pre-pentium 2 PCs and System7
and earlier Macs into this category. 


#140 of 203 by keesan on Sat Feb 17 13:13:48 2007:

keesan spends almost no money on entertainment.  And provides or sets up 10-20
free computer systems a year to friends, neighbors, etc., who otherwise would
not have any computers, and learns a lot, and gets a system that is much more
pleasant to work with than anything that could be purchased.


#141 of 203 by cyklone on Sat Feb 17 14:03:37 2007:

"More pleasant" being a subjective term that, as you define it, would not
apply to the vast majority of computer users.


#142 of 203 by johnnie on Sat Feb 17 15:16:55 2007:

Well, the setting-it-up part is no doubt a big PITA, but the end result
is likely pleasing, particularly if the ultimate user is concerned about
the simple things (such as email and word-processing).


#143 of 203 by keesan on Sat Feb 17 15:42:23 2007:

I enjoy learning to set it up and I hate GUIS.  I just figured out how to set
up 38MB of linux with three browsers, and kermit and a few other useful things
which includes X and a window manager and email and text editor.....
for someone who only wants to use it for browsing and email.  Her ex husband
liked what I set up for him.  She also wants Office Suite which is no fun at
all to set up and wants 121MB typical (Office 97) plus the 150MB of minimal
Win98.


#144 of 203 by cross on Sun Feb 18 00:58:15 2007:

You're free to hate whatever you want.  My concern is that, when you set
someone up with some recycled computer, that you inject your own biases and
potentially prevent them from doing useful stuff in a way that's compatible
with the mainstream.  Certainly, installing Windows 98 on someone's computer
isn't a good idea; it's ridiuled with security problems.  You'd be better off
figuring out how to install Ubuntu or something lik ethat.


#145 of 203 by keesan on Sun Feb 18 01:20:21 2007:

Why is Ubuntu better than Slackware?  Win98 is only to run WORD on (not all
of Office Suite, I was told.  She just can't tell them apart).  Linux for
internet.  With Opera.  No Shockwave Flash or noises.  Good for email.
I am setting it up to go into X directly, with a menu.

Ubuntu does not work well on old hardware.  It could not even find our modem
or sound card, and it wastes most of the memory on unneeded daemons and boots
slowly and runs slowly.  


#146 of 203 by cross on Sun Feb 18 01:35:25 2007:

Ubuntu is easy for non-experts to use, in addition to experts.


#147 of 203 by keesan on Sun Feb 18 03:04:33 2007:

What I set up is extremely easy to use.  Ctrl-ESC or mouse for a menu, or type
m for a menu, then type the first letter of the program or use a mouse if you
prefer or type the whole program out.  Looks something like Windows but much
faster and does not crash.  Customized.


#148 of 203 by maus on Sun Feb 18 05:53:19 2007:

Let me rephrase what Cross was saying: Ubuntu is easy for non-experts
*OUT OF THE BOX*. It does not require expertise to set up, it does not
require expertise to maintain, it provides a clear upgrade path and a
straightforward source of application software. I would say that all of
the above is doubly true for SLED/OpenSuse (though Ubuntu seems to be a
little bit faster). Ditto RHEL/CentOS. Even bog-standard Slackware is
appropriate, as it is a common, well-known and supported environment.
The skills learned on these mainstream systems are more portable and
more useful outside the network of you and your friends. People learn to
use tools that implement and expose standard interfaces, and learn to do
things in ways that are valuable elsewhere. Yes there is value in
learning how to do things with minimal tools, but it puts into place a
barrier to use that reinforces the notion that Linux/UNIX is
unnecessarily hard. 


#149 of 203 by twenex on Sun Feb 18 13:21:11 2007:

Jeff was just about to ask Sindi why she favours referring to herself in the
third person when you switched to using first.

Why does Sindi hate GUIs?

Jeff agrees with Cross; for the kinds of things one can do with Win98 these
days, a GUI linux distro would be better for most people than Win98. There
are several distros Jeff or Sindi could use which are low-powered and have
GUIs.

Jeff agrees that Sindi has a right not to use GUI's if she chooses not to,
but surely Sindi realises that she is not at all in the majority in this?
Cross was right to use the word "pathological" in the sense he used it, but
Jeff agrees with whomever pointed out that Cross should have explained his
use of the word.


#150 of 203 by cross on Sun Feb 18 15:11:14 2007:

Dan wonders why people insist on calling him Cross and not just, you know,
Dan.  Or even dan.


#151 of 203 by twenex on Sun Feb 18 15:29:25 2007:

Jeff calls Dan {C,c}ross because that's his login name.


#152 of 203 by twenex on Sun Feb 18 15:29:41 2007:

And surname.


#153 of 203 by cross on Sun Feb 18 15:33:11 2007:

Dan understands that.  But Dan would sort of prefer Dan.


#154 of 203 by keesan on Sun Feb 18 16:04:01 2007:

keesan to cross and twenex:
Someone specifically wanted Win98 to play Win9X educational games on with her
daycare kids.  Someone else specifically wants to learn MS WORD so she can
get a job in an MS OFFICE.  Other people (who I have never met) wanted
something their friends in Ypsi could help them with.  
Linux is going onto computers for friends, and they seem able to manage
without help once I set it up with Opera and give them a quick lesson.  No
Windows worms or viruses, and it runs much much faster.  It also takes only
a few minutes to copy over from a USB memory stick and uncompress (once I
partition and format the drive), and put on their phone number, login and
password.  I don't need to download 8MB of video driver because I have some
older video cards that work with a standard driver and configuration.

Since ALL they want to do is browse the internet, and don't need anything
fancy such as Shockwave Flash or even sound, this is a small tool that does
the job much faster than a big one.  

keesan does not like GUIs because:  they take longer to set up and load
(though linux X and icewm are only a couple of seconds), they waste memory,
they are designed around a mouse and it is quicker for me to use the keyboard,
they waste hard drive space (a bigger hard drive boots slower because linux
checks it out first).  But sets them up for friends so they can use Opera.

Opera is now usable as 'user' - su user first.  I dial as root so that user
won't have access to the file containing login and password.  

Three of our friends for whom I set up both Win98 and linux with opera have
not used the Win98 version, they prefer linux.  Faster, more stable.

I had it booting into X (vt1 - the other vts were still console) until I added
the password package and now I lost that.  SOmeone suggested putting startx
in profile but then I would not have three consoles in addition to X.  Any
other ideas?  I had edited inittab to only make vt1 go to X.

memory leak, forcing core dump, segmentation fault (I exited lynx on vt3)....


#155 of 203 by cross on Sun Feb 18 16:41:25 2007:

The problem with Windows 98 and web browsing is that Windows 98 is horribly
insecure.  A Windows 98 machine dialing into the net is likely to get
compromised almost immediately, even one coming over a slow dialup line! 
Hence the danger.

I would check and see if Windows programs run under WINE or something similar
before going with Windows 98.

It's not just about simplicity and space, it's also about security.


#156 of 203 by maus on Sun Feb 18 17:55:21 2007:

Dan, sorry about referring to you by your login name. I'll try to
remember to refer to you by your given name instead. No insult intended.


#157 of 203 by maus on Sun Feb 18 17:55:35 2007:

P.S: Dan or dan ? 


#158 of 203 by cross on Sun Feb 18 18:36:48 2007:

That's all right; I prefer Dan, but will respond to either.  I'm just curious
why people choose one over the other, and of course, I realize that no insult
was intended.


#159 of 203 by keesan on Sun Feb 18 19:47:06 2007:

If you read closely, you will see that I put Win98 on for wordprocessing and
linux/opera (run as user from now on, not root) for internet.  I ran a
chkrootkit program which did not detect any linux viruses after 4 years of
my running as root.  I have no daemons running (no open ports) except Xvesa.
I am offering Abiword for wordprocessing but people want Windows.  Some people
also insist on Windows for browsing and that is what I gave them.  I told them
to get a virus checking program and not do anything high security.  They do
email.  They do not have the money to purchase a new computer with new
Windows.


#160 of 203 by cross on Sun Feb 18 19:48:34 2007:

...and what we're saying is that those people would be better off with Linux,
even if they want to run Windows software, it would be better to run it under
emulation than on native Windows.

Where do you get all these Windows licenses, anyway?


#161 of 203 by keesan on Sun Feb 18 20:17:57 2007:

We get Win98 on lots of used hard drives and remove junk from it.
I am not going to spend time learning to run Windows emulated under linux just
for people who don't want to use linux.  I tried dosemu and it works badly
with the programs I wanted it for.  Does okay with a CAD program in xdosemu.
Would you like to put some minimal linux with Windows emulation on 500MB
drives for me to give away?


#162 of 203 by keesan on Sun Feb 18 20:23:10 2007:

How much space would linux with WINE require?  wineHQ has a Slackware 10.2
binary that should run on a 386 that is 10MB tgz - maybe it would fit but I
don't have Slackware 10.2 or want it.  Upgrading the glibc to use this binary
would require also changing the kernel and modules.  Not impossible and this
certainly takes less space than 150MB of Windows 98 itself.  I have 150MB free
space in the linux partition for the friend who wants WORD and linux/opera.
And only 50MB free in the Windows partition.  Thanks for the idea.


#163 of 203 by keesan on Sun Feb 18 21:16:03 2007:

I can't find a binary for anything older than Slackware 10.2.  Source is 11MB
bz2.  A list of supported applications includes WORD97 and 2000.


#164 of 203 by cross on Sun Feb 18 21:37:35 2007:

Regarding #161; Err, that's kind of illegal.


#165 of 203 by maus on Sun Feb 18 23:48:45 2007:

Can you give me a bit more information about the boxes besides the max
drive size? Are the PCI-based? What brand of NIC do they use? I may be
able to throw together a nice image that you can toast onto a bunch of
CF cards or small drives, and be done. I will probably base it off of a
standard version of Slack 11 or something else "normal" and
well-known/well-supported. 


#166 of 203 by twenex on Mon Feb 19 00:33:10 2007:

Now Jeff understands that Sindi needs to install Windows for some users, but
agrees at least provisionally with Dan that the way Sindi is "procuring" Win98
at least MAY be illegal.

Jeff hopes Dan notices that Jeff has now started calling Dan "Dan," and is
pleased.

I am going to stop the irritating parodic third-person nonsense now.


#167 of 203 by cross on Mon Feb 19 00:59:59 2007:

Dan notices and Dan appreciates.  And now I will also knock off all the 3rd
Party nonsense.


#168 of 203 by nharmon on Mon Feb 19 01:30:01 2007:

Sindi might not think she is doing any harm pirating Windows for people
but the fact is Microsoft regularly goes after people who do so. How
they do it is offer free copies of properly licensed Windows in exchange
for the names and addresses of the people who install the pirated software.


#169 of 203 by edina on Mon Feb 19 01:47:31 2007:

re 167  Brooke would like it better if Dan started referring to 
himself as "The Dan".  


#170 of 203 by cross on Mon Feb 19 02:06:44 2007:

Sort of like, ``The Donald''?

``Rosie's a slob!''


#171 of 203 by edina on Mon Feb 19 02:12:03 2007:

Exactly!!  Please Jesus let your hair be better.....


#172 of 203 by cross on Mon Feb 19 02:12:52 2007:

Oh yes; don't worry, my hair is better than The Donald's comb-over.


#173 of 203 by keesan on Mon Feb 19 03:40:58 2007:

Re 165 (?) from maus  Are you offering to put together some small linux that
I can transfer via some external drive (I have a USB external drive and a 1GB
USB flash drive) that will run Opera and also WORD under WINE?  That fits in
500MB?  This particular computer has 2 PCI slots and I put a video card into
one of them (rather than dealing with an odd driver that I might have to
compile).  No network card.  Eventually an external modem.  I was told not
to put any more work into it right now.  It was supposed to be for the
to-be-ex-wife of a friend and we will see if she even wants to use the linux
part of it for the internet.  He says she is rarely satisfied with anything
he gives her.  He is delighted with the linux/opera I put on his computer.
By great good fortune he already has a Lucent modem in there which worked with
ltmodem.o driver.  My two lucent modems did not.  

If she does not like linux, I will let him put Win98 and WORD on the drive
after removing linux and enlarging the Win98 partition.
I installed Slackware 10.1 or 10.2 on one computer and it immediately filled
up at least 1GB in a minimal installation, and wasted 64MB of RAM on running
unneeded daemons.  It had several pages of config file for  X.  I am using
a generic Xvesa driver with no config file.  


#174 of 203 by cross on Mon Feb 19 03:45:02 2007:

(Her not being satisfied with things he gives her might have more to do with
the fact that she is a soon-to-be-ex-wife than that she is not satisfied with
those things.  And perhaps, vice versa.)


#175 of 203 by keesan on Mon Feb 19 16:04:27 2007:

Vice versa.  Today someone brought us 9 64MB and 4 128MB SIMMs so we could
actually put together computers with 128MB RAM and Ubuntu (if we had lots of
large hard disks - it demands 2GB) but Ubuntu is slower.  He also brought four
SIMMS (two labelled 64MB) that have two little slots very close to each other
just off of center, with no chips on two (just greenboard) and some metal
cased thing on the other two.  ???  And a no-name motherboard with onboard
i810 video sound and only three slots to replace them with.  No ISA and we
are out of extra external modems.  Anyone have 28.8K or 33.6K they don't want?


#176 of 203 by maus on Mon Feb 19 19:32:37 2007:

I will look into creating an image for this. In my past experience, the
basic load of Slackware was pretty small and light. If it has grown over
the years, you would be better off using a decently sized drive to
accomodate a reasonable distribution of Linux. 


#177 of 203 by keesan on Mon Feb 19 20:13:59 2007:

I am putting linux on the hardware that we have and do not want a distribution
of linux, just enough files to dial and run Opera.  The standard Slackware
puts on all sorts of unwanted things.  Wait on this project to see if the
person getting the latest computer really wants linux.  Why an image file
rather than a .tgz?  What kernel does the Slackware 11 glibc require?  The
glibc from Slackware 9.1 insisted on a kernel 2.4, which I have compiled.

A lot of the reason why the later kernels are larger is they support newer
hardware, and I am using Slackware 4 or earlier age hardware.  


#178 of 203 by cross on Mon Feb 19 20:27:28 2007:

The Linux pundits will tell you until they are blue in the face that the
kernel is actually very small and that all the support for newer hardware is
done via kernel modules; so supporting older systems in a small amount of
space is trivial: just delete the modules you don't need.

The reason you may want to do this is because giving someone Windows 98 and
Office 98 is illegal.


#179 of 203 by jep on Mon Feb 19 21:27:47 2007:

Dan: I refer to people by loginid because it is unique.  There are other
people here called "Dan" but no others called "cross".


#180 of 203 by cross on Mon Feb 19 21:32:01 2007:

That's fine, I guess.


#181 of 203 by keesan on Tue Feb 20 00:07:25 2007:

The kernel that comes with my linux is about 400K.  The standard Slackware
2.2.16 kernel is about 1GB.  How big is 2.6?  

The person getting the latest computer has their own OEM copies of 98 and
OFFICE.

The later libraries are a lot bigger. 


#182 of 203 by mcnally on Tue Feb 20 02:00:52 2007:

 re #181:  surely you mean 1MB, and not 1GB.

 on my Ubuntu laptop, my untrimmed kernel is about 1.2MB.

 mcnally@skookum:~$ ls -l /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.12-10-386
 -rw-r--r--  1 root root 1207281 2007-02-06 20:04 /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.12-10-386


#183 of 203 by keesan on Tue Feb 20 03:50:07 2007:

1MB, of course.  Is 2.6 less buggy than 2.4?
My custom kernel, with modular support for sound, framebuffer, usb, and scsi,
is 700K (2.4.31).  The generic kernel that came with my linux is 430K.


#184 of 203 by mcnally on Tue Feb 20 06:47:27 2007:

> Is 2.6 less buggy than 2.4?

I have no idea how to answer that.  Which version of 2.4?  
Which version of 2.6?  Which bugs?


#185 of 203 by keesan on Tue Feb 20 15:45:24 2007:

2.4.31, latest 2.6.  2.4.31 has a few problems.  Can't load usb_serial as a
module (has to be built-in).  Have to load gameport.o for some sound cards
to work even though it is not listed in modules.dep.  Why are you using 2.6?


#186 of 203 by maus on Tue Feb 20 16:01:46 2007:

2.6 is what most distributions ship with. Besides working better with
desktop-type hardware, it allows device-name persistence for
hot-pluggable devices, hot-plug capabilities for PCI boards (PCI, PCI-X
and Compact PCI) which allows live repairs and newer ones offer
kdump/kexec functionality. Aside from that, it is actively developed and
*supported* by Linux distributors. There are a few problems, to be sure;
namely, the OOM-killer behaves badly and can cut off access to the box
entirely (bigger problem on overloaded servers) and the memory
oversubscription is a little flaky, leading to the OOM-Killer being
called. Both of these are tunable parameters, though, and
oversubscription can be turned off and OOM-killer can be made more sane
or shut off entirely. Additionally, the t3 driver (Tigon gigabit
ethernet driver) is fucking nuts and can cause stability problems in
kernel-space (I have seen one box freak out multiple times in a day when
under heavy network load using a NIC that is run by the t3 driver --
customer was very *NOT HAPPY* and we wound up disabling the t3 NIC and
adding an Intel PRO/1000 NIC board and all was happy). 


#187 of 203 by maus on Tue Feb 20 16:02:15 2007:

Wow, I probably should have broken that into a couple of paragraphs.


#188 of 203 by keesan on Tue Feb 20 18:03:40 2007:

I don't even know what OOM is and have no need for hotplugging.  Had to use
kernel 2.4 for USB-storage (but DOS also supports that except for my SM card
reader).  I probably would not take advantage of any features of 2.6 on my
1998-2001 hardware.  Am giving people 2.2.26 and also optionally 2.4.31 on
computers with USB ports (two so far).  2.4 correctly identifies the amount
of memory even in computers with i810 video, where I have to subtract 1MB from
onboard memory with mem= to make 2.2 kernels boot.  If I knew a whole lot more
I could try to write my own kernel without things I don't use.  Some of our
computers have 12MB RAM so a smaller kernel is better.  

I still can't get ssh working as 'user'.  


#189 of 203 by maus on Tue Feb 20 18:10:44 2007:

Hot-plugging is useful for external devices, such as USB, Serial and
Firewire devices. 

OOM means out-of-memory. The Linux kernel oversubscribes memory, and if
it runs out of total virtual memory (RAM + swap), it runs a daemon in
kernel space that forcibly kills processes and forcibly free()s their
memory so that the kernel will not panic. In some cases, it can behave
pathologically, but in many cases can keep the system up through a
transient memory shortages. On memory-constrained systems, a
well-behaved way of coping with OOM conditions is critical, and if the
kernel requests more memory and can't get it, it can panic or worse. 


#190 of 203 by keesan on Tue Feb 20 22:58:37 2007:

I don't run out of memory.  We are giving everyone at least 64MB which is
plenty for running one browser.  But I have had the problem on computers with
8MB or less RAM and no swap space - it just crashes.  

USB storage works fine if you just load the drivers manually.  Same for serial
devices.

Thanks for the explanations.  I have never managed to use even 128MB RAM at
one time, as a single user.


#191 of 203 by maus on Thu Feb 22 05:10:56 2007:

Keesan, I regularly see boxes with 2 GBytes of RAM and 4 GBytes of swap
start shooting processes to free memory (and I usually get a ticket when
the OOM-killer shoots sshd or httpd). Real systems with real loads and
thousands of users accessing simultaneously a web application that talks
to a database require more RAM. 

Manually loading drivers is an unacceptable inconvenience for many
users, and imposes a barrier to use. For most people, the operating
environment is simply a vehicle to use the commands that they need; most
people do not get off on faffing around with their operating environment
to achieve things that have been solved elegantly and reasonably. 


P.S: My partner, who is sick and on medications responds "wake up and
come into the 1990s". 


#192 of 203 by keesan on Thu Feb 22 16:15:31 2007:

The computers we put together are for single users and don't run out of
memory.  The one person who requested USB was really interested in learning
linux and had no objection to typing usb-on and mount /dev/sda1 /mnt.
And he was delighted with the 15 second boot.  So while 2.6 may be much better
for your situation, 2.2 (2.4 if you need USB storage) works fine for mine.
Most of our computers and libc5 are from the late 90s already. A 1999 linux
runs faster on a 1998 computer than the latest and greatest.

To use the internet on the latest computer I set up, boot the computer,
type lin to boot from DOS to linux (or win for Windows instead), root
and Enter to login as root, dial to dial as root, login user and Enter to
login as user and automatically load X, then you can select programs from
the START menu with a mouse (or type their names in an rxvt).  Type reboot
to reboot before shutting off the computer.  I put little menus with
instructions along the way (in autoexec.bat and issue).  How is this not
elegant?


#193 of 203 by fudge on Tue Feb 27 12:07:23 2007:

this just gave me the idea of removing the gear stick from my car, after all
in town I hardly get to use anything other than the second gear, which with
a little getting used to you can also start moving with. that way the car will
be lighter and I'll have more space to move! less consumption and more
comfort! ;P


#194 of 203 by nharmon on Tue Feb 27 13:04:34 2007:

While you're at it, remove all of the seats and only install the ones
you need, adding and removing them as needed. And a car from 1982 drives
the same as one from 2004, so there is no point to buying anything newer
than 15 years old. Oh, and fuel injection annoys me, so anything I get
has to be carburated. If you ever need an oil change, Jim might be able
to help. He'll jack up the car, remove the drain plug, refill it with
oil, and let you drive off forgetting to reinstall the drain plug. When
your car dies, you can just pick up another junker from us for $50.


#195 of 203 by keesan on Tue Feb 27 19:49:38 2007:

Good idea.  Better yet, use a bike in town.  Takes up much less space, makes
almost no noise or pollution, and is better for everyone's health.


#196 of 203 by tod on Tue Feb 27 21:13:44 2007:

And if you get hungry, eat some dried leaves and twigs and drink water from
the curb.  


#197 of 203 by nharmon on Tue Feb 27 21:16:36 2007:

Or some chocolate you find in a garbage can.


#198 of 203 by keesan on Tue Feb 27 22:29:00 2007:

People cannot digest cellulose.


#199 of 203 by slynne on Tue Feb 27 22:49:30 2007:

nope, we sure cant. It is part of what is in poop. I learned in my 
biology class what else is in poop and I think I will be grossed out 
for the rest of my life. 


#200 of 203 by tod on Wed Feb 28 00:03:04 2007:

It tends to be yellow or brown in color, too.


#201 of 203 by keesan on Wed Feb 28 00:29:30 2007:

The color is I think from broken down heme (from blood).


#202 of 203 by fudge on Wed Feb 28 10:38:39 2007:

this conversation started on nonsense and is turning to shit


#203 of 203 by gull on Sat Mar 24 06:06:39 2007:

Re resp:141: Well, it's a bit like saying that driving a modern car is 
more pleasant than driving a Model T.  It's obviously true, to most 
people, but there are still people who really enjoy restoring and 
driving an antique.


Re resp:179: For what it's worth, I find 'gull' perfectly 
acceptable.  'David' is awfully generic. ;)


Re resp:195: It also greatly increases your chances of getting killed 
by being run over by a car, thus reducing the overpopulation 
problem. ;)


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: