Grex Radio Conference

Item 1: Welcome to the 2nd edition of Radio

Entered by rcurl on Fri Mar 20 18:48:43 1998:

68 new of 123 responses total.


#56 of 123 by harish on Mon Oct 26 13:47:50 1998:

Hello Everybody,I am merely a SWL and operate with a domestic type
sangean, telescopic antenna.I wonder if there are any like me here. As
far as I can see, this appears to be only for HAMs. Although it is
interesting to read,it would be nice to exchange SWL/DX news once in a
while.


#57 of 123 by omni on Mon Oct 26 16:43:59 1998:

 This item and for the most part the conference is not just for hams. We
happen to have a a high concentration of hams here. Harish, are you interested
in getting a ham license? I would imagine that India has a codeless
license. Please feel free to contribute anything you think in relevent.


#58 of 123 by harish on Thu Oct 29 14:05:48 1998:

Thanx OMni,
I am definitely interested in a HAM license.unfortunately when I had
time for all that during my college days, I never got around to it.
Nowadays I am just too packed to devote time. In India as far as I am
aware we still have to work our way up to a codeless license.(as i
understand it, codeless means no morse code). That means I have to pass
atleast two exams with a mandatory period between successive stages.
Perhaps I will eventually get my license when I retire in about 30 years
time.hopefully Radio will still be around then. But if there are any
HAMS from India on this conf, I will be glad to know the exact
procedure, in case my understanding of the process mentioned here is
incorrect harish


#59 of 123 by avizit on Mon Dec 14 12:41:50 1998:



#60 of 123 by rvc on Fri Jan 1 03:46:38 1999:

Just call me Bob Here is some background I was a CB'er way befor the term
Good Buddy Joined the Army in 1970 went to Radio school at Fort Jackson SC
came out with a MOS of 05E20 Noncode Radio Operator Went to Vietnam were I
was a RTO for the 14th Engr Bn 59th Land Clearing Co (Rome Plows) and 84th
Engr Bn C Co after the Army I Took Electronics at DeVry Atlanta in 1974 after
school went to work with RCA at AUTEC in the Bahamas then went to Harris Corp
in 1977 R&D Labs Melbourne Fl was Downsized out in 1994 Took two years
vacation and now working at Relm Wireless Corp as a Bench Tech in Customer
Service Repairing All of Relms OEM Hand helds MPV MPU PT and WHS These 
Transcevers work well in the HAM Bands by the way I'm not a ham can't
Hack the Code Makes me crazy.


#61 of 123 by n8nxf on Fri Jan 1 04:06:51 1999:

There is technician no-code class.  All privileges 50 MHz and above.
I have the same problem with the code.


#62 of 123 by runic on Sun Mar 7 19:17:06 1999:

im looking for ham operators in the annapolis, maryland area to get some
equipment. im just getting into ham and i am reading a lot. if you can help
me, please email at evolution@psynet.net. thanks!


#63 of 123 by rcurl on Sun Mar 7 19:49:29 1999:

Get a copy of QST (or join ARRL and get it regularly). They list "hamfests",
where hams and commerical vendors sell new and used gear, and you can meet
a lot of hams. Hamfests are held frequently all over the country, and you
should be able to find a couple per month within easy driving distance.
You can also find ham clubs affiliated with ARRL through the ARRL web
site at arrl.org. 


#64 of 123 by des on Mon Mar 8 13:42:42 1999:

Get the ARRL's book,"Now You're Talking".  It contains everything you need
to get your first license.  Once you get a Novice or Technician license you'll
magically start to receive catalogs in the mail.  You'll even be able to
legally operate some of the equipment in them.


#65 of 123 by eprom on Fri Oct 1 16:40:58 1999:

I bought an Alinco DJ-X10T, wide band reciever...from Hamradio outlet
its really cool..its kinda like the Icom R-10 but a little cheaper. :)


#66 of 123 by goose on Wed Oct 6 07:10:28 1999:

Now that you've had it a few days, what do you think of it?  I've been looking
at a few of those wde band receivers and the x10 looks pretty appealing.


#67 of 123 by eprom on Fri Oct 8 07:47:44 1999:

I was kinda intimidated at first cuz I've heard horror stories
about how some Japanese radios can be hard to figure out.
This one was simple...I remembered the basic functions after about
5 hrs of playing with it.

I bought a Radio shack Pro-2037 back in 95 that cost me $200,
it does 30-960MHz with lots of gaps, 200 channels. 
(but is quicker scan=25ch/sec search=50ch/sec)

this Alinco cost me bout $330 after S/H (2nd priority)
covering 100KHz-1999MHz (minus cell freqs)
has 1200 channels (40ch per 30banks)
it has a neat little bandscope thats kinda like a spectrum analyzer.
the sensitivity is good. (.25uV for 30-1000MHz NFM 3.5KHz 12dB SINAD)


the only 2 things I dislike about it is:

1) its super slow  scan=5-6ch/sec  search=25ch/sec
2) when programming in names for channels im limited to 8 characters
   and it takes awhile to programs.

a really good website for more info is:

http://www.strongsignals.net/htm/revx10.htm


$300 seems like alot for a fancy scanner...but im really into radios
so to me it was worth it.



#68 of 123 by goose on Fri Oct 8 16:41:15 1999:

Thanks for the comments, and I'm with you about the $300, but it sure covers
a lot of bandwidth.  Although I do lump these more into the reveiver category
over the "scanner" category even though you can do "scanning".  How is it's
coverage of the SW bands?  My only SW receiver is old, analogue, and frankly
hard to use, and I thought I could get something like the Alinco to get two
birds with one stone, SW receive and everything else!


#69 of 123 by eprom on Mon Oct 11 01:21:30 1999:

I was playing with it the other day..using the factory antenna and I could
pick up 5070 WWCR easily, I could hear 10000 WWVH when I turned the squelch
down to its lowest setting....when I had it im my car using my mag-mount 2-mtr
5/8 wave antenna I could listen toCW on 30 meters and a conversation on 15
meters (SSB). Im gonna make a super long wire antenna and report the results
in a few days. :) 

so far I pretty happy with the SW performance..it seems to be albe to "hear"
everything that my Radio Shack DX-392 can hear.


#70 of 123 by sun78 on Sat Jan 22 12:44:48 2000:

i  want to know if ,it would be possible to create my own
fm STEREO receiver
please reply


#71 of 123 by rcurl on Sat Jan 22 14:49:47 2000:

Of course. They are devices and you could put one together yourself,
though the difficulty of doing so would depend upon how much of it
you buy as subunits. Stereo receivers are so inexpensive, however,
that I wonder why you would want to.


#72 of 123 by scott on Sat Jan 22 16:10:51 2000:

Depends on where you are, though.  But FM stereo is pretty complicated stuff
to build yourself, compared with FM mono which isn't too much harder than AM.
Maybe find a broken receiver or tuner to salvage the FM circuits from?


#73 of 123 by rcurl on Sat Jan 22 16:55:50 2000:

Try Kiwanis... :)


#74 of 123 by goose on Fri Jan 28 17:45:09 2000:

Purchase Radio has an FM receiver chip that needs only power and a few
additional parts.  I dunno if it's stereo.


#75 of 123 by rcurl on Fri Jan 28 17:47:18 2000:

Get two of them... :) (actually - how does stereo FM work?)


#76 of 123 by prp on Fri Jan 28 21:13:23 2000:

The main signal carries A+B, which mono receivers use.  There is a 
subcarrier which has A-B.  Stero receivers add the two signals for
one channel, and subtract them for the other.


#77 of 123 by gull on Fri Jan 28 21:21:09 2000:

It's a bit complicated.  As I recall, the monaural signal (Left+Right) is
present as usual.  Combined with this, however, is a Left-Right signal
that's single-sideband amplitude modulated on a 19 kHz "pilot tone." The
whole schpiel is then mixed together and transmitted as an FM signal.  Since
normal FM only carries audio out to 15 kHz, the pilot tone and L-R signal
aren't audible on a monaural receiver.  When a stereo receiver senses the
pilot tone is present in the demodulated audio, it seperates it out and
demodulates the L-R signal from it.  By adding and subtracting that signal
from the monaural signal, it recovers the two channels.  (Since
(L+R)-(L-R)=2R, and (L+R)+(L-R)=2L.) I know this isn't very clear...someone
else might be able to explain it better.  I could also scan the basic block
diagram of the process from some class notes I have from a few terms ago,
if you'd like.

This system seems a bit Rube Goldberg-ish, but in practice it works pretty
well, and keeps compatibility with monaural FM receivers.  (Another scheme
that was tried and thankfully rejected was transmitting the left signal on
the FM broadcast band and the right signal on the AM broadcast band.  One of
the obvious problems with this was that the fidelity of the two channels
just wasn't equal.)


#78 of 123 by gull on Fri Jan 28 21:21:36 2000:

#76 slipped in, and pretty much summarizes my response. ;>


#79 of 123 by rcurl on Fri Jan 28 21:29:33 2000:

Many thanks. I'm wondering why I hadn't thought to find out a long time
ago how this works. I guess two monaural receiver chips just won't do
it.....  :)



#80 of 123 by jerome on Sat Jan 29 15:08:15 2000:

The L-R signal is sent using double-sideband suppressed carrier centered
around 38 kHz with a bandwidth of 15 kHz.  The 19 kHz pilot tone (which
is also transmitted) is used by the receiver to demodulate the L-R channel.

To make things even more interesting there is something called "Subsidiary
Communications Authorization" (SCA) that allows yet another signal to
be sent on this composite WFM signal.  This signal is centered on a
subcarrier of 67 kHz and is FM modulated with a maximum deviation of 7.5 kHz.
SCA is often used for commercial-free broadcasting of Muzak, commodity
reporting, the Physicians' Network, and services of interested to the
handicapped.

The August and September 1987 issues of Radio-Electronics magazine had
a two-part "Build This" article for a SCA/FM stereo receiver.  I purchased
the kit and built it.  The performance is actually quite good.  The kit
was made by North Country Radio (P.O. Box 53, Wykagyl Station, NY 11804),
which (I believe) is still in business and last I knew still sells the kit.


#81 of 123 by devnull on Sun Jan 30 03:00:58 2000:

So do the majority of FM stations transmit SCA?


#82 of 123 by gull on Sun Jan 30 03:29:24 2000:

Re #80:  I forgot that the 19 kHz tone gets doubled to get the actual
subcarrier frequency.  Thanks.


#83 of 123 by jerome on Sun Jan 30 18:09:08 2000:

resp:81  A lot of them don't, actually.  One possible reason for this,
according to the article, is "In the case of SCA, modulating one
subcarrier of a stereo signal uses up about 10% maximum of the total
75 kHz deviation (100% modulation).  In practice, that reduces the
main channel's signal strength by about 1 dB.  Normally, such a drop
in signal level would not be noticeable.  However in areas with
crowded FM bands, every dB counts in the race for ratings, and
revenue."  The article also mentions that there is sometimes a second
SCA subcarrier at 92 kHz, which (if used) would take even more power
away from the main channel.

I live in a different area now than when I built the radio.  All of this
SCA talk is giving me the urge to fire up that radio and see what this
city has to offer in terms of SCA.


#84 of 123 by gull on Sun Jan 30 20:33:34 2000:

SCA used to be popular as a way to broadcast commercial-free background
music for stores and such.  I'd imagine it's less popular now that there are
satellite services such as Muzak.


#85 of 123 by jerome on Mon Jan 31 03:15:11 2000:

I dusted off my SCA receiver.  I found three SCA transmissions: One
background music, one data transmission, and one that sounded like some
type of community service thing.  I can't remember if I have the receiver
set for the 67 kHz subcarrier or the 92 kHz one (I should have brought
that adjustment out to the front panel), so I there might have a few
others that I missed.


#86 of 123 by goose on Mon Jan 31 19:12:26 2000:

http://www.northcountryradio.com of course is where you'll find North
Country Radio!

Jerome, do you live in Ann Arbor?


#87 of 123 by jerome on Mon Jan 31 22:51:05 2000:

resp:86 (second line) Negative.


#88 of 123 by jerome on Mon Jan 31 22:54:26 2000:

Oh, and if anyone does want to build North Country Radio's SCA/FM Stereo
receiver, be advised that there were a few mistakes in the article,
including on the schematic.  I would be happy to supply details to anyone
who wanted to build one.


#89 of 123 by abndaddy on Thu Oct 12 23:40:22 2000:

Hello Ya'll! My name is Chad and I am a Special Forces Communications Sergeant
in the Army. After going through the school here at Ft. Bragg I have developed
a "slight' interest in radio communications. I am 15/15 in code, and have
experience with HF,UHF,VHF communications......but I really think that I'm
going to pick up QUITE A BIT here; And that's why I'm here! I need some of
you "OLD-TIMERS" to point me in the right direction for when I get to my Unit
in Germany!


#90 of 123 by rcurl on Fri Oct 13 03:36:42 2000:

This conference is pretty quiet, although there are a lot of hams around
about, and some even lurk here. But, raise any questions you want, and
we'll see what expertise is reading.


#91 of 123 by ball on Sun Dec 10 11:06:21 2000:

Re #90: I'd noticed it was pretty quiet in here, but I do
  check it periodically for signs of life.  Perhaps I should
  start asking some dumb questions in an attempt to kick-
  start some threads of conversation? =o)


#92 of 123 by xdiablox on Sun Jan 28 15:51:32 2001:

hi y people  im new give us  some help danieldunford@yahoo.co.uk cheers


#93 of 123 by gull on Sun Jan 28 16:57:39 2001:

Could you be more specific? ;)


#94 of 123 by frzngost on Sat Apr 7 04:17:53 2001:

Hello from Jim VE9MHZ /VE3 in Morrisburg, Ontario Canada
My packet HomeBBS is KA2JXI.#NNY.N.USA.NA in Ogdensburg, New York
My AMPRnet Gateway-BBS is mtlgw.ampr.org
73 and hope to chat with you later


#95 of 123 by eprom on Sun Apr 8 23:37:39 2001:

re#94   Cool callsign! :)


#96 of 123 by goose on Wed Apr 11 17:32:10 2001:

Welcome Jim.


#97 of 123 by sadko on Wed Feb 27 22:55:49 2002:

Hi ev erybody. Ham call is kd2nw Tom from NY Can somebody give me some
hints on setting up my computer and rig for PSK?


#98 of 123 by goose on Wed Mar 20 15:24:03 2002:

Sure, get a good interface (build or buy, I built) don't overdrive the input
of your rig, and use lower power (I use 50w on my 100w rig) due to the high
duty cycle of psk31.

See you on 20M!


#99 of 123 by goose on Thu Mar 21 19:32:05 2002:

Just a little self serving info: Two weeks ago I passed my Extra Class upgrade
exam!  I've also applied for a vanity call and hopefully will be K8MZO in
short order.


#100 of 123 by rcurl on Thu Mar 21 21:32:25 2002:

dahditdahdit dahdahdah dahdit dahdahdit ditdahdit ditdah dah ditditday
ditdahditdit ditdah dah ditdit dahdahdah dahdit ditditdit.


#101 of 123 by glenda on Thu Mar 21 22:03:52 2002:

Congrats.  I am currently planning on taking at least my General upgrade exam
at Dayton.  If I can find the time to cover both books, I'll try for the
Extra.  Staci is hoping to take her 
tech Lite.



#102 of 123 by goose on Thu Mar 21 22:44:33 2002:

- .... .- -. -.- ...   .-. .- -. .

That's great Glenda.  I hope you can get both out of the way.  Wish Staci luck
from me too.  Are all of you going to Dayton this year?  IF so, I hope to see
you there.


#103 of 123 by glenda on Thu Mar 21 23:49:10 2002:

STeve, Staci, and I will be there.  Damon doesn't like all the hub bub.  I
think it may stem from the year he was 4 and got lost twice in less than an
hour.  He was very independant even then and just would not stay right next
to us and used the old Mom thinks he is with Dad and Dad thinks he is with
Mom trick to go where HE wanted to go.


#104 of 123 by goose on Mon Apr 1 14:26:54 2002:

If I can get a couple more VEs, I can give you and your family exams.
I just received my VE credentials in the mail over the weekend.


#105 of 123 by rcurl on Mon Apr 1 15:05:27 2002:

Exams are given monthly in Ann Arbor through the ARROW amateur radio club.
See http://www.cyberspace.org/~arrow/ (The page will be updated shortly
for their next meeting, which will be on Wednesday, 10 April, at 7:30 p.m.
The ARROW station will open at 6:30 for any hams wishing to use the HF
radio, and also following the meeting.) 



#106 of 123 by glenda on Mon Apr 1 17:28:35 2002:

Because of my class and work load I won't be ready for testing any earlier
than Dayton.  I won't be taking any Spring/Summer classes so will have a
little over 2 weeks to prepare between the end of this semester and Dayton
weekend.  Staci may not be ready even then, but is working on it whenever she
isn't doing school work.  She will take hers at one of the ARROW sessions if
she misses being ready for Dayton.

STeve needs to find a pre 1987 Call Book to get grandfathered into General
Class and then take his upgrade for Extra.


#107 of 123 by goose on Wed Apr 3 15:51:26 2002:

The exams that the ARROW gives are extremely well run and I am glad to be in
the list of available VEs for their test sessions.  



#108 of 123 by krokus on Tue Apr 9 03:21:45 2002:

re 106
I'll check with my uncle, he might have an older callbook.  What was
his call back then?


#109 of 123 by glenda on Tue Apr 9 12:12:40 2002:

WB8WSF then and now.

I sent in my pre-reg for testing at the Friday 2:30 session.  Staci is holding
off sending hers in til near the end of the month.  She still isn't sure that
she can feel ready by then.


#110 of 123 by omni on Fri Jul 5 08:34:00 2002:

   Congrats to all. 

  It is nice to see that the VE program is still going strong. I just renewed
my license for a second 10 year hitch.

   Thanks to STeve for helping me get what I have.


#111 of 123 by gustavob on Wed Aug 28 13:32:23 2002:

Hello to all. I am HC1XP from Quitpo Ecuador S.A. please hlp me with some
ideas about antenas for 160 and 80 meters bands. Thanks!!! :)


#112 of 123 by danr on Tue Sep 10 23:28:45 2002:

Hola, Gustavo. Welcome to the Radio Conference!


#113 of 123 by devnull on Wed Sep 11 03:23:48 2002:

How much space do you have available for 80m/160m antennas?  Do you have
any towers, etc?


#114 of 123 by goose on Wed Sep 11 03:39:38 2002:

Greetings Gustavo de K8MZO, welcome to Grex.


#115 of 123 by krokus on Wed Nov 13 23:46:35 2002:

re 108
I finally got the chance to ask my uncle, even though I'm sure it's way
too late to be of any help, and he doesn't have any callbooks.


#116 of 123 by rahuls on Tue Oct 28 18:02:09 2003:

Hello


#117 of 123 by infonot on Sun Aug 1 01:05:41 2004:

Hi, I have used vhf marine radio and have become fascinated with the ameture
radio idea. There is an exam in canada I can take for vhf operator. Is there
another exam I can use to broadcast my own content from a laptop. basically
I want my own 2 way radio station. not too greedy eh. exit


#118 of 123 by eprom on Sun Aug 1 01:50:53 2004:

umm...please define "content". There are amateur radio modes that use a
computer such as PSK-31 (2 way txt mesg), SSTV (slow scan TV), APRS (GPS
relayed via radio), RTTY (does anyone even use this mode anymore?), Packet
(older than PSK-31 with error correction) and probably more that I haven't
thought of.


#119 of 123 by krokus on Sun Aug 1 17:21:30 2004:

You should also consider what you're talking about as a broadcast, which is
typically not allowed on amateur frequency allocations.

As for Jeff's comments, RTTY us used still on HF, but is non-corrected
text-only.  AMTOR, the amateur version of SITOR, is corrected text-only,
mainly used on HF.  There are modes called Clover, G-TOR, and HF Packet
that allow file transfers over the air as well.

Something else you might look at is that some of the "channels" allocated
under 802.11b are in the amateur allocation, and can be used for a short
distance radio network.


#120 of 123 by springne on Thu Jan 19 15:38:39 2006:

I'm a newby booby.

My call is KA6ATN.

My qth is Cedar Creek, Texas.

Hear you 5 by 9.


#121 of 123 by tod on Fri Jan 20 22:37:13 2006:

Roger that


#122 of 123 by bmoran on Wed Feb 15 03:34:05 2006:

Bill here. I listen to shortwave, and sometimes hear hams, the airport and 
some Detroit police station on my tabletop scanner. What did the previous 
message say? I guess I'm newbier than him!


#123 of 123 by rcurl on Wed Feb 15 07:08:42 2006:

Roger that = I agree. "Roger" is an acknowledgement that a communication has
been received and understood. If you are asking about #120:

KA6ATN is a radio amateur call sign licensed in region 6.
QTH = station location
5 by 9 means that the readability is "5", the scale running 1 to 5, and that
the signal strength is "9", the scale running 1 to 9. 


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: