Grex Oldcoop Conference

Item 89: Everyone has an "Item Restoration" Item... My turn to have one.

Entered by ryan on Thu Jan 22 21:41:16 2004:

ryan Mon Aug 29 22:49:56 2005 Ryan Antkowiak,,, ryan Mon Aug 29 22:49:56 20
ryan Mon Aug 29 22:49:56 2005 Ryan Antkowiak,,, ryan Mon Aug 29 22:49:56 20
ryan Mon Aug 29 22:49:56 2005 Ryan Antkowiak,,, ryan Mon Aug 29 22:49:56 20
ryan Mon Aug 29 22:49:56 2005 Ryan Antkowiak,,, ryan Mon Aug 29 22:49:56 20
ryan Mon Aug 29 22:49:56 2005 Ryan Antkowiak,,, ryan Mon Aug 29 22:49:56 20
ryan Mon Aug 29 22:49:56 2005 Ryan Antkowiak,,, ryan Mon Aug 29 22:49:56 20
ryan Mon Aug 29 22:49:56 2005 Ryan Antkowiak,,, ryan Mon Aug 29 22:49:56 20
ryan Mon Aug 29 22:49:56 2005 Ryan Antkowiak,,, ryan Mon Aug 29 22:49:56 20
ryan Mon Aug 29 22:49:56 2005 Ryan Antkowiak,,, ryan Mon Aug 29
18 responses total.
#1 of 18 by tod on Thu Jan 22 22:12:21 2004:

This response has been erased.


#2 of 18 by cyklone on Thu Jan 22 23:30:21 2004:

Sounds good to me, tod.

#3 of 18 by jp2 on Thu Jan 22 23:58:54 2004:

This response has been erased.


#4 of 18 by naftee on Fri Jan 23 00:59:09 2004:

Tough shit for ryan.

#5 of 18 by jp2 on Fri Jan 23 01:07:10 2004:

This response has been erased.


#6 of 18 by slynne on Fri Jan 23 15:23:21 2004:

I think it is fair to put the notification in the actual item itself. 
It would be unreasonable to expect a fw to notify users who are no 
longer on the system.

#7 of 18 by tod on Fri Jan 23 16:39:19 2004:

This response has been erased.


#8 of 18 by albaugh on Fri Jan 23 18:39:52 2004:

As much as I recognize the controversy surrounding the items deleted, which
will remain (increase?) when they are restored, other than scribbling the
words of the creators of the items - which they could have and should have
done for themselves, instead of having the items deleted - these items should
be restored *intact*.  Other posters can then go and scribble their responses,
just as they could for any other item.  jep could have and should have done
this, instead of requesting his items be deleted:  He should have scribbled
his own responses first.  He could have then retired the item.  He then could
have himself personally contacted all the other posters, telling them what
he had done and why, and requested them to scribble their responses too.
I think that is exactly what should happen once these items are restored,
given that the first step - the scribbling of the creators' comments - will
have been done "for free", by staff.

#9 of 18 by jp2 on Fri Jan 23 19:06:14 2004:

This response has been erased.


#10 of 18 by albaugh on Fri Jan 23 19:23:29 2004:

That's fine with me, especially since it's part of the proposal.

#11 of 18 by ryan on Fri Jan 23 19:26:16 2004:

This response has been erased.


#12 of 18 by jp2 on Fri Jan 23 19:27:13 2004:

This response has been erased.


#13 of 18 by ryan on Fri Jan 23 20:29:49 2004:

This response has been erased.


#14 of 18 by jp2 on Fri Jan 23 21:00:28 2004:

This response has been erased.


#15 of 18 by cyklone on Fri Jan 23 22:20:06 2004:

Actually, under remmer's reasonable solution, I don't think ryan's fears
are justified. I don't believe any of the polybots posted to jep's item.
Since the proposal is to privately allow deletions before public posting,
the copyable item, for them anyway, will already contain the various
*voluntary* deletions.

#16 of 18 by naftee on Sat Jan 24 04:41:29 2004:

re 11 You should be in bed if you're so sick.  Go to bed and stay there for
a long, long itme.

#17 of 18 by naftee on Sat Jan 24 04:41:47 2004:

time

#18 of 18 by jesuit on Wed May 17 02:14:46 2006:

TROGG IS DAVID BLAINE

There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: