Grex Oldcoop Conference

Item 73: Scribble this

Entered by jp2 on Thu Jan 8 19:33:11 2004:

I wish to propose the scribble conference.  All text must be scribbled by the
poster immedietly after posting.  

I will FW.
34 responses total.
#1 of 34 by willcome on Thu Jan 8 19:48:33 2004:

I vote yes.

#2 of 34 by mynxcat on Thu Jan 8 19:57:38 2004:

Remember, if you're fw, and you want to scripple your post, it won't 
let you, in BackTalk

#3 of 34 by jp2 on Thu Jan 8 19:58:01 2004:

This response has been erased.


#4 of 34 by mynxcat on Thu Jan 8 19:59:13 2004:

Unluckily, I can't telnet in from work.

#5 of 34 by gull on Thu Jan 8 20:20:08 2004:

This response has been erased.


#6 of 34 by willcome on Thu Jan 8 20:30:13 2004:

This response has been erased.


#7 of 34 by gelinas on Thu Jan 8 21:01:29 2004:

No vote is necessary, but I see no reason to object to the conference.
I doubt it will be very interesting, but if that's what you want, go for it.

#8 of 34 by willcome on Thu Jan 8 21:38:26 2004:

This response has been erased.


#9 of 34 by naftee on Thu Jan 8 23:03:27 2004:

This response has been erased.


#10 of 34 by jp2 on Mon Jan 12 19:49:27 2004:

This response has been erased.


#11 of 34 by willcome on Mon Jan 12 19:50:17 2004:

HEY, let me be FW< please!

#12 of 34 by jp2 on Tue Feb 3 16:44:13 2004:

This response has been erased.


#13 of 34 by albaugh on Tue Feb 3 20:42:12 2004:

> All text must be scribbled by the poster immedietly after posting.

> I will FW. 

And as FW, if someone *doesn't* scribble his/her text "immedietly" (sic) after
posting, are you going to take it upon yourself to do so?  If that is what you
have in mind, then please be advised that at this moment, there is no
consensus or policy that would view that as acceptable FW behavior.  So if
you do that, and someone complains, expect your FW privileges to be revoked
with all dispatch.

#14 of 34 by jp2 on Tue Feb 3 20:51:21 2004:

This response has been erased.


#15 of 34 by albaugh on Tue Feb 3 20:59:08 2004:

There is a proposal entered - which might be put to a vote one of these days
- dunno - which would allow the establishment of such conference-specific
norms, one of which might in fact be "expect scribbling at every turn".
Why anyone would want to participate in such a conf. is beyond me.
But at the moment there is no consensus that such a conf. with expanded FW
"censorship" powers can exist on grex.  Maybe soon, but not right now.

#16 of 34 by twinkie on Wed Feb 4 07:24:34 2004:

re: 15

You'd be surprised, actually. 

M-Net wrestled over whether stating that items may be scribbled in a
conference's charter was enough. I think the debate popped up a couple times,
and lasted for weeks. 

I believe the Twinkie Conference (on M-Net) is the only conference where
scribbling at every turn is allowed. It is also one of the most popular
conferences (besides General) on the system. In fact, I think there have been
more than a few months when it was *the* most popular non-General conference.

People tend not to object very much to having their responses scribbled when
you come right out and say "Hey, if you write something, it may be scribbled
by somebody who isn't you." It's telling them (and backing it up with charter)
that's the key.

#17 of 34 by cyklone on Wed Feb 4 13:15:20 2004:

Full disclosure in advance. What a novel concept!

#18 of 34 by naftee on Wed Feb 4 14:14:06 2004:

The Twinkie conference on m-net sucks.  The only reason why it is marginally
active is that there happen to be a lot of homosexual people on m-net who
adore twinkie.

#19 of 34 by twinkie on Wed Feb 4 17:18:20 2004:

You're just upset because you've been banned from it.

#20 of 34 by naftee on Wed Feb 4 21:18:12 2004:

Wow, how little you know.

#21 of 34 by twinkie on Wed Feb 4 21:57:14 2004:

Cry about it in the Polytarp Conference.

#22 of 34 by naftee on Thu Feb 5 01:36:33 2004:

twinkie, I haven't been "banned" from the m-net twinkie conference.  The
only wasto do that is to make it read-only, such as the staff conference is. 
Now shut up and stop lying about m-net things.

#23 of 34 by twinkie on Thu Feb 5 17:51:23 2004:

"Banned from posting". Better now, crybaby?

#24 of 34 by naftee on Thu Feb 5 23:58:19 2004:

Worse.  Ever hear of backtalk, poltergeist?

#25 of 34 by twinkie on Fri Feb 6 02:02:32 2004:

I didn't realize you used that festering piece of shit.

#26 of 34 by naftee on Fri Feb 6 02:15:43 2004:

Hell no.  That's the reason why I don't read the twinkie cf on m-net!

#27 of 34 by boltwitz on Fri Feb 6 04:26:44 2004:

Re. 16: also that other conference you fw (formula weight) allows it:  the
polytarp conference.

#28 of 34 by twinkie on Fri Feb 6 04:59:26 2004:

You make is sound as though I don't FW the audio, or FW conferences...

#29 of 34 by naftee on Fri Feb 6 15:32:02 2004:

Because you don't.  You forgot  to mention canada

#30 of 34 by twinkie on Fri Feb 6 18:05:53 2004:

Oh yes. Mustn't forget Canada.

#31 of 34 by bhoward on Sat Feb 7 01:11:02 2004:

Why?

#32 of 34 by naftee on Sat Feb 7 01:51:35 2004:

Because there's also oldcanada

#33 of 34 by naftee on Sun Feb 22 23:14:40 2004:

#9 of 32: by Jim Daloonik (naftee) on Thu, Jan  8, 2004 (18:03):
 Make it !

 re 4 Did you try SSH?

#34 of 34 by jesuit on Wed May 17 02:14:33 2006:

TROGG IS DAVID BLAINE

There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: