Grex Oldcoop Conference

Item 66: Accepting Paypal verification for Grex Memberships

Entered by aruba on Sun Jan 4 18:51:15 2004:

I'd like to propose that we accept Paypal's verification of users as
acceptable ID for a Grex membership.  This will make it easier for people to
become members of Grex.

I'm still not sure I entirely understand Paypal's system, so I would
appreciate help from people who have been through the process.  It seems
they have at least two levels of security: 1) verification, and 2) address
confirmation.

Here's how
https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=p/gen/verification-outside
describes verification:

--------------------------------------
To become Verified, a PayPal Member must provide us with proof that he 
or she has a checking account. This tells us that you have passed the 
screening process of a financial institution.
--------------------------------------

But then it goes on to say:

--------------------------------------
U.S. residents can become Verified in two easy steps: 

Add a checking account (after you log in to your PayPal account) 
Confirm your checking account

If you live outside the U.S., you can become Verified by following these
steps: 

Add a credit card 
Enroll in the Expanded Use Program 
Enter the Expanded Use number
---------------------------------------

So I guess if you're outside the US, you just have to have a credit card.
(I don't know what the Expanded Use Program is.)

Here's what
http://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=p/gen/shipping-address-outside
says about confirmed addresses:

---------------------------------------
A buyer's Confirmed Address is checked against the credit card billing 
address maintained by his or her credit card company, or is verified 
by PayPal through an alternate process.
---------------------------------------

However, it goes on to say

---------------------------------------
An Unconfirmed Address sometimes poses an inconvenience for legitimate 
buyers. An address is Unconfirmed if it is not associated with a 
credit card or it can not be independently verified by PayPal. Gift 
Addresses and addresses associated with a Switch or Solo debit card 
can not be confirmed. Also, in general, most non-U.S. addresses can 
not be confirmed at this time.

Since an address may be Unconfirmed for several reasons, it is the 
seller's responsibility to look at all aspects of the transaction 
before deciding whether to ship to an Unconfirmed Address.
A buyer's Confirmed Address is checked against the credit card billing 
address maintained by his or her credit card company, or is verified 
by PayPal through an alternate process.
---------------------------------------

So, there are good reasons why a person outiside the US wouldn't have a
confirmed address.

So: Should Grex accept Paypal's verification of a user?  If so, should we
require a confirmed address as well?
54 responses total.

#1 of 54 by gelinas on Sun Jan 4 19:37:17 2004:

Since we accept a check as verification of identity, I think we can accept
Paypal's "Verified Members".

I don't think we should accept a Paypal "Confirmed Address" as proof of
identity.


#2 of 54 by ryan on Sun Jan 4 21:43:30 2004:

This response has been erased.



#3 of 54 by jep on Mon Jan 5 14:44:24 2004:

I went through the Paypal process, and am both "Verified" 
and "Confirmed".  I had to go through it because I bought something on 
eBay, then the seller wouldn't accept payment unless I 
was "Confirmed".  I still don't know why.

I don't clearly remember the process, but I think it involved supplying 
a credit card in addition to my checking account number (which Paypal 
already had).

I would like to see Grex lighten up just a little on verification.  It 
would be no harder to fake IDs directly, or create checking accounts 
with false information, than to create Paypal accounts with Confirmed 
Addresses for the purpose of spoofing Grex into allowing Internet 
access or votes.

Also, this isn't something on which I feel the need to vote.  If the 
treasurer believes someone is a unique person that's good enough for 
me.  I think the standard being used should be made clear to everyone, 
but other than that it should be up to the discretion of the treasurer.


#4 of 54 by davel on Mon Jan 5 15:02:37 2004:

Um.  Wasn't Grex's current verification system established by member vote?
In that case, I'd like to think that either the board or the membership would
have to vote to modify it.

But I may be misremembering, of course.


#5 of 54 by jp2 on Mon Jan 5 15:23:47 2004:

This response has been erased.



#6 of 54 by aruba on Mon Jan 5 15:56:42 2004:

Right, the current ID policy was passed by the board.


#7 of 54 by albaugh on Mon Jan 5 22:29:19 2004:

But here's the deal (flame me if I'm off):  Even though *PayPal* might have
someone's address / locate-the-sucker info, *grex* still wouldn't have it,
if it simply took PayPal's word for it.  So if grex wanted to locate someone
on its own (would it ever want to do that), it would have to work with PayPal
to get it.  And if grex were required to identify a member, would saying
"please contact PayPal" be legit?


#8 of 54 by aruba on Mon Jan 5 23:15:49 2004:

Yup, that's the tradeoff all right.  I suspect law enforcement would be OK
with us referring them to Paypal, but I don't know.  There was some talk a
while ago about a potential law requiring ISPs to accumulate and retain a
certain amount of information on paying customers.  I didn't pay much
attention because it didn't seem to confilt with anything Grex does.  Does
anyone else know anything about such a proposed law, and if it ever came to
anything?

The other question is, does accepting Paypal's word for someone's ID
fulfill our requirement that each membership be associated with a distinct
person?  I think so; I don't know how one person could spoof Paypal's system
so that they looked like two people to us.


#9 of 54 by gull on Tue Jan 6 15:23:45 2004:

They'd have to obtain two credit cards with different names and
addresses.  Certainly possible, but it would be far easier to fake our
other verification methods.  I think PayPal is at least as reliable as
what we accept now.


#10 of 54 by flem on Wed Jan 7 17:26:48 2004:

At one point, I had control of both my personal paypal account and
Grex's.  I don't know much about Paypal's current identity verification
policies, or the difference between personal and institutional accounts
or how we would be able to tell, but I suppose it's not impossible that
a person could acquire two grex memberships that way.  

But, as gull pointed out, there are other equally fraudulent ways to
beat our ID requirements.  I think taking paypal's word for it is a
reasonable thing for us to do.  


#11 of 54 by flem on Wed Jan 7 17:31:20 2004:

Hmm, on second thought, it would be nearly trivial to get two voting
memberships if we accept paypal; just send in a check the old way for
the one and use paypal for the other.  As I understand it, we have no
way of knowing that the two are from the same source, and you don't even
really have to lie.  

Again, I'm not sure how much we care.  But it's somethign to think about.  


#12 of 54 by gull on Wed Jan 7 18:36:26 2004:

I don't see that as a big risk.  Two voting memberships for one person
is not the end of the world, and it'd be difficult to expand that scheme
to a number of memberships large enough to affect a vote.


#13 of 54 by mynxcat on Wed Jan 7 18:54:30 2004:

It would be a big deal if something was passed on the strength of one 
vote. I don't think it's correct to assume that it's ok if one or two 
people could hold two voting memberships but it's ok if it's not a 
large number.


#14 of 54 by gull on Wed Jan 7 18:58:12 2004:

I'm not saying it's desirable or that attempts shouldn't be made to keep
it from happening.  But the effort we go to to prevent it ought to be in
proportion to the risk.  I don't think this, alone, is a good reason not
to accept Paypal.


#15 of 54 by ryan on Wed Jan 7 19:07:51 2004:

This response has been erased.



#16 of 54 by gull on Wed Jan 7 19:14:54 2004:

I don't think that's relevant, really.  We're not forcing people to use
Paypal, but if they want to I think it's reasonable to let them.  You
might want to read back in other items and see how Grex has genuinely
been ripped off by other methods of accepting credit cards.  Paypal is
extremely low-risk by comparison.


#17 of 54 by aruba on Wed Jan 7 20:00:09 2004:

Yeah, Paypal is not the most savory institution in the world.  I'm careful
not to leave our moneywith them any longer than necessary, because I don't
trust them not to freeze our account someday. 

But, these days, a whole lot of our income comes through Paypal, so it
benefits Grex to use them.

Greg - you said someone could send in a check and also send money through
Paypal.  Doesn't Paypal's verification method check that you are giving
your real name?  And likewise the bank's?  So wouldn't someone have to lie
to one or the other, and not get caught, for that scheme to work?


#18 of 54 by flem on Wed Jan 7 20:30:13 2004:

I don't know, Mark.  Do you get people's real, full names when they send
a paypal payment?  Can you find that out from whatever user info they do
send with paypal?  It's been far too long since I took a payment for me
to remember.  


#19 of 54 by jep on Wed Jan 7 20:31:21 2004:

How much of Grex's income is via Paypal?


#20 of 54 by aruba on Wed Jan 7 21:20:53 2004:

Grex received approximately $2300 via Paypal in 2003.  That's about 32% of
our total income.


#21 of 54 by jep on Wed Jan 7 21:50:50 2004:

Wow, that's quite a lot.


#22 of 54 by jlamb on Wed Jan 7 23:44:02 2004:

This response has been erased.



#23 of 54 by gull on Thu Jan 8 02:03:58 2004:

When you get a Paypal payment, you get the sender's email address, full
name, and their confirmed address (if they check the box to send it.)

I use Paypal quite a bit for accepting ebay payments, these days.


#24 of 54 by aruba on Thu Jan 8 03:37:37 2004:

Should a confirmed address be enough ID for Grex, then?  Or should we
require verification?


#25 of 54 by gelinas on Thu Jan 8 05:19:19 2004:

Verification.


#26 of 54 by gull on Thu Jan 8 14:08:19 2004:

I think it should be enough.  Paypal's address confirmation scheme is
harder to fake than the one we already use, anyway.


#27 of 54 by flem on Thu Jan 8 16:02:46 2004:

OK, I guess if paypal sends you the person's full name with each
payment, my concerns are addressed.  


#28 of 54 by sarahlee on Sat Feb 7 21:43:20 2004:

Paypal's Terms of Service allow one person to have two Paypal accounts.
They have to be two email seperate addresses and one has to be a
Premier/Business account and the other a Personal account. ("Users may
only hold one Personal account and either one Premier or one Business
account." http://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=p/gen/ua/ua-outside)
However, they also say: "However, because user verification on the
Internet is difficult, PayPal cannot and does not guarantee any user's
identity."

I think any Paypal account associated with a bank account would be equal
verification as paying by check would be. No credit card is needed to be
Verified; only a bank account. (Not even a checking account. I'm
Verified with a savings account.)


#29 of 54 by jmsaul on Mon Mar 1 02:29:58 2004:

jlamb sucks syphilitic pit bulls.  Without a dental dam.


#30 of 54 by krj on Mon Mar 1 05:24:08 2004:

This doesn't sound like the jmsaul I know.   ???


#31 of 54 by gelinas on Mon Mar 1 11:40:46 2004:

(I think he is expressing displeasure at the recent scribbling of more
responses.)


#32 of 54 by rational on Mon Mar 1 12:05:22 2004:

I'm sooooooooooooo tired.


YAwny ywayn ywany.


#33 of 54 by salad on Mon Mar 1 21:56:08 2004:

ME T00


#34 of 54 by jmsaul on Mon Mar 1 23:14:41 2004:

Re #30, #31:  Some people deserve reasoned argument.  Some people deserve
              a good sjamboking (look it up).  I'm sick of the scribble
              kiddies, and yes, I include Valerie in that category.


#35 of 54 by rational on Mon Mar 1 23:22:15 2004:

SCRIBBLE DIBBLE DIBBLE


SCRIBBLE

SCRIBBLRLDLIBIBIBBLBLELDL

SVFTIBR:BRLLDIBBLEDIBBLEDOO

I SCRIBBLE YOU


#36 of 54 by styles on Fri Mar 5 03:53:05 2004:

pickle:anthony:/usr/ports/net:133% dict sjamboking
No definitions found for "sjamboking"


#37 of 54 by jmsaul on Fri Mar 5 04:14:02 2004:

Get a better dictionary?

http://www.bartleby.com/61/34/S0443400.html


#38 of 54 by rational on Fri Mar 5 05:50:20 2004:

MAYBE THAT DEFINITION WAS SCRIBBLE DIBBLE DIBBLED


#39 of 54 by jp2 on Fri Mar 5 14:19:53 2004:

This response has been erased.



#40 of 54 by salad on Fri Mar 5 22:28:51 2004:

Pickle?







#41 of 54 by styles on Sat Mar 6 02:02:23 2004:

#37: interesting.
#40: pickle.


#42 of 54 by jesuit on Wed May 17 02:14:32 2006:

TROGG IS DAVID BLAINE


#43 of 54 by tsty on Tue Nov 28 08:10:49 2006:

has there been any movement toward paypal money transfers? 
  
it seems to be pretty stable and responsive adn responsible handling
a couple million $$$ per day from ebay .
  
something has to be right withthat, imnsho.


#44 of 54 by aruba on Tue Nov 28 19:36:36 2006:

TS - Grex accepts money via Paypal, and we also accept a verified Paypal
account as qualified ID for becoming a Grex member.


#45 of 54 by tsty on Thu Dec 28 10:48:29 2006:

greate ... thankxxx


#46 of 54 by tsty on Sat Dec 30 08:42:19 2006:

ummmmmmmm,   what is the email address to use from  paypal?
  
could that be put in motd (or did i miss it somewherez?)


#47 of 54 by aruba on Wed Jan 10 14:39:38 2007:

To send money to Grex using paypal, go to
  http://www.cyberspace.org/member.html
and click on one of the paypal logos at the bottom of the page.


#48 of 54 by tsty on Fri Mar 23 04:26:26 2007:

so there is no way for an9nymus donation ability? as i understand - adn use - 
paypal, all that;s neede is an    email address ... adn that is missing
form the grex page referenced above.
  

> ummmmmmmm,   what is the email address to use from  paypal?
  


#49 of 54 by slynne on Fri Mar 23 04:34:04 2007:

the best way to donate anonymously is to mail in a money order


#50 of 54 by aruba on Sun Mar 25 06:26:36 2007:

Re #48: The email address to send payments to is treasurer@cyberspace.org .


#51 of 54 by tsty on Thu Mar 29 06:51:14 2007:

thank you.


#52 of 54 by tsty on Sun Apr 8 06:42:12 2007:

how about posting that information in motd?


#53 of 54 by aruba on Sun Apr 8 21:54:14 2007:

I'm not sure anyone reads the motd anymore.  Most of what one needs to know
about sending money to Grex is in

http://www.cyberspace.org/member.html
http://www.cyberspace.org/memfaq.html


#54 of 54 by tsty on Tue May 22 07:55:47 2007:

cant hurt - might help
./


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: