Grex Oldcoop Conference

Item 61: Transient copyright violation: IN THIS ITEM

Entered by willcome on Wed Dec 24 18:38:44 2003:

As an outside observer, I noticed that item one before this caused a lot of
controversy.  One side, apparently, appreciated its brilliance, while the
other side couldn't understand, and showed this by forgetting the item. 
However, this left the argument unresolved & blue-balled, and, since none of
us like that, I'm going to force the issue:


 This is a declamation of proclamation.  No-one, let alone YOU, shall escape
 its breadth.  No-one's going to let you slip if you attempt this.  We'll
 bulwark What You Should Do by kicking you and slapping your admittedly cute
 face while having painful eyes.  Don't forget that the only reason you're
here
 is because I'm able to give your answer while asking you the question.

2 new of 8 responses total.


#1 of 8: by Jim Daloonik (naftee) on Tue, Dec 23, 2003 (03:29):
 ---- plongeur joining (Dec 23 02:33)
 plongeur: love.
 plongeur: Love yourself, plongeur.
 plongeur: And accord yourself the benefit you would you ANYONE you love.

#2 of 8: by Eric R Bassey (other) on Tue, Dec 23, 2003 (09:20):   <expurgated
& scribbled>

#3 of 8: by Eric R Bassey (other) on Tue, Dec 23, 2003 (09:21):
 Would someone link this item to /dev/null please?

#4 of 8: by John H. Remmers (remmers) on Tue, Dec 23, 2003 (09:33):
 "Forget" is remarkably efficacious.

#5 of 8: by Greg Fleming (flem) on Tue, Dec 23, 2003 (12:02):
 "Don't forget that the only reason you're here is because I'm able to
 give your answer while asking you the question."

 Quite possibly the most interesting thing you've ever said, willcome.

#6 of 8: by Jim Daloonik (naftee) on Wed, Dec 24, 2003 (00:14):
 The whole response is brilliant.  Anyone who forgets this item is a jerk!!

#7 of 8: by Jan Wolter (janc) on Wed, Dec 24, 2003 (11:20):
 So, if all staff members and board members ares are supposed to read this
 conference, are we allowed to forget items in it?  After all, you never know
 when even the most brainless and inappropriate item might turn into a serious
 discussion topic, which would then be missed by all the baff who are supposed
 to be weighing the words of every user to help formulate the perfect policy
 for Grex.

 Well, I guess item did just turn vaguely relevant, although at this point
it
 is only being read by latecomers, idiots, and those who martyr themselves
by
 refusing to forget anything.  This is not a useful set of people to hold a
 discussion with, so I'll answer my own question by forgetting this item
 myself.

#8 of 8: by Carson (carson) on Wed, Dec 24, 2003 (13:04):
 (hey!  I resent being part of a useless set!  and to be called an idiot
 on top of that...  uh, yeah.  Jan's right again.)
6 responses total.
#1 of 6 by ryan on Wed Dec 24 23:21:59 2003:

This response has been erased.


#2 of 6 by janc on Thu Dec 25 04:16:05 2003:

I think it kind of relates to that geek social fallacy thing.  Yes, every
momma's child has a right to speak.  But being listened to is something you
have to earn.

#3 of 6 by dcat on Thu Dec 25 05:49:16 2003:

"People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for
the freedom of thought which they seldom use."
  -- Soren Kierkegaard

#4 of 6 by willcome on Thu Dec 25 06:09:54 2003:

The stories I could tell about Soren and me.

#5 of 6 by naftee on Fri Dec 26 05:15:15 2003:

At least all the important responses got through,.

#6 of 6 by jesuit on Wed May 17 02:14:30 2006:

TROGG IS DAVID BLAINE

There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: