Grex Oldcoop Conference

Item 52: Paying for Work on Next Grex

Entered by mary on Thu Dec 11 17:22:19 2003:

Is it time we contracted and paid for technical work Grex needs done?  I
know, radical stuff.  We've not gone there before, ever, that I know of.
We've always been quite proud of the fact we existed and thrived on the
gift of volunteer time.  But that's not working so well for us at the
moment.  Maybe it's time to carefully choose where we need some work done,
find out what it would cost us, see if anyone qualified wants the job, and
move on. 

Could we get three hours of work for $250?  What could be accomplished
with that time?  Can we afford it?  Can we afford not to? 

This idea is not in any way intended to slight our volunteer staff.  Far
from it.  They have priorities and, rightfully so, Next Grex isn't up
there with paying the bills and spending time with growing children. 

But maybe it's both practical and fair to invest some money into moving
this project forward. 

Whatcha think?
122 responses total.

#1 of 122 by jp2 on Thu Dec 11 18:26:28 2003:

This response has been erased.



#2 of 122 by tod on Thu Dec 11 20:29:56 2003:

This response has been erased.



#3 of 122 by slynne on Thu Dec 11 21:34:16 2003:

Why would this mean being cornered with a vendor/contractor. Isnt 
setting up a system more work than maintaining it?


#4 of 122 by remmers on Thu Dec 11 21:42:10 2003:

#1 isn't really fair.  Dan had some ideas about how the transition
should be organized, but he'd already outlined those ideas, they
mostly involved other people doing the work, and Dan wouldn't have
been available for a period of time in the near future anyway.

I'll have to think about #0 a bit, but my first thought is that
three hours wouldn't be enough to get much done and Grex couldn't
afford what it would cost to get the whole job done at market rates.


#5 of 122 by willcome on Thu Dec 11 21:47:52 2003:

Haha!  Remmers's trying to defend his wife even when he knows she's in the
wrong.


#6 of 122 by tod on Thu Dec 11 22:15:58 2003:

This response has been erased.



#7 of 122 by ryan on Thu Dec 11 22:26:39 2003:

This response has been erased.



#8 of 122 by jlamb on Thu Dec 11 22:28:14 2003:

This response has been erased.



#9 of 122 by mary on Thu Dec 11 22:53:57 2003:

I believe at this point the operating system needs to be 
loaded, there are version issues, and every step of the
setup is being documented.

I wasn't thinking along the lines of hiring unknown
(to Grex) techies, but rather paying one or some of 
our current staff for a few hours of work, to jump-start
the project.  I'm not even sure they'd have time to
fit in paying work.

I'm just otherwise so out of ideas on this one.

Thanks for the offer, ryan.  I have a feeling if you
want staff to see your offer you'd be better off 
entering it in garage, where Next Grex work is being
discussed.


#10 of 122 by jlamb on Thu Dec 11 23:02:55 2003:

This response has been erased.



#11 of 122 by jlamb on Thu Dec 11 23:04:11 2003:

This response has been erased.



#12 of 122 by willcome on Thu Dec 11 23:15:51 2003:

I volunteer.  I'm skilful and mature.


#13 of 122 by tod on Thu Dec 11 23:31:00 2003:

This response has been erased.



#14 of 122 by willcome on Thu Dec 11 23:48:04 2003:

only sadly.


#15 of 122 by bhoward on Fri Dec 12 00:51:39 2003:

I've a standing offer open to help out on anything remaining to
be completed on nextgrex.  Unfortunately, the one thing I
cannot help out with from afar is loading the basic OS and
getting it onto the net.


#16 of 122 by gelinas on Fri Dec 12 00:55:07 2003:

(Which really seems to be the sticking point right now.)


#17 of 122 by jep on Fri Dec 12 02:38:16 2003:

I'm not in favor of paying a staffer (or anyone else) for contracting 
work for NextGrex.  We're volunteer run and I can't see any reason why 
that should change.

We were told a year ago that buying NextGrex was urgent, and then the 
treasurer was pushed to buy everything quickly because it was urgent 
to get everything into place.  The urgency of the project failed as 
soon as the stuff was all bought.  I am not going to conceal that I, 
for one, feel let down by the staff about it all.  Maybe it really was 
urgent and Grex is being left dangling; maybe someone panicked and 
stampeded Grexers into sending money for no good reason.  Maybe both.

But there you go.  We all placed our trust in some people, and they... 
well, they really didn't earn it.  It does not mean they're bad 
people.  They're excellent people, and we were once lucky to have them.

Grex can't back out and get it's money back.  No one can presently 
move the project forward.  We can't stay where we're at.  There's not 
enough will or outrage or responsibility (or something) to replace the 
staffers with someone who *will* do the job.  So here we sit, until 
Grex dies and goes away, or someone does what they said a year ago 
they'd do, or someone else takes over the project.


#18 of 122 by gelinas on Fri Dec 12 04:04:08 2003:

If we hadn't bought the hardware, we'd be even further from migrating.  The
hardware purchased was advanced enough that we'll still get several years'
use of it after we migrate, even if it is a year old by the time we migrate.

I don't know that paying to get the project off the dime would help.  I can
see how it _could_ help, though:  Someone who has to choose between paying
the bills and working on grex could be influenced by being able to do both
at once.


#19 of 122 by jlamb on Fri Dec 12 05:11:18 2003:

This response has been erased.



#20 of 122 by naftee on Fri Dec 12 05:15:17 2003:

re 13 willcome considers the caps lock key as cheating and being unlucky.


#21 of 122 by bhoward on Fri Dec 12 05:18:59 2003:

I do not agree with John's harsh conclusion that staff has let us down
or that they have violated the trust of grex users.  That strikes me as
wrong-headed and more than a little mean.

I also think arguments that there is some sort of expiry date on the
hardware we purchased are silly.  Whatever the capacity of hardware
we purchase, the grex community would expand to use that capacity.
My guess is that the increase in capacity from the new hardware would
simply unmask some other constraint like network capacity or the like.
The more pressing issues in my view are those such as how to keep drawing
people in the conferences and how to redistribute staff workload more
evenly.

I do not think we can afford to hire someone to do the work and from what
I understand of the current situation, the issues limiting staff time
for work on nextgrex are not the sort that would go away by incentivizing
through some cash outlay.  Even if they were, that is not how I'd like to
see the relationship between staff and the larger community redefined.
Right now staff are part of the community; throw in salaries and folks
start talking about violated contracts and "violated trusts".

What I would like to see is a confirmation of the specific requirements
necessary to see nextgrex into production and then a plan from the board
on how we are going to finish those off with existing staff resources.
If we can't get there from here with the staff resources on hand, I would
like the board to draw on volunteers from the larger grex community to
see this project through.


#22 of 122 by aruba on Fri Dec 12 05:22:42 2003:

I guess I pretty much agree with Bruce, but like Mary, I'm out of ideas for
how to move forward.


#23 of 122 by naftee on Fri Dec 12 05:26:25 2003:

But you have lots of ideas in moving backwards, don't you.


#24 of 122 by jlamb on Fri Dec 12 05:27:57 2003:

This response has been erased.



#25 of 122 by jlamb on Fri Dec 12 05:33:31 2003:

This response has been erased.



#26 of 122 by mynxcat on Fri Dec 12 13:11:23 2003:

I agee with John in that if we had waited to buy the hardware we could have
got it cheaper. The hardware may not be outdated by the time we get around
to using it, but the prices may have dropped, so grex wouldn't have spent so
much on it.


#27 of 122 by gelinas on Fri Dec 12 13:29:27 2003:

If we hadn't bought the hardware, we wouldn't have made as much progress as
we have.  If we didn't have the hardware, we'd have made NO progress toward
the migration.


#28 of 122 by slynne on Fri Dec 12 13:42:37 2003:

Would it be possible for someone to do the onsight work with the 
guidance of someone who is remote? I mean, I can put a cd in a drive 
just as well as anyone else. 


#29 of 122 by gelinas on Fri Dec 12 13:44:45 2003:

The hardware is currently located in the home of janc, who apparently has
everything *except* the time. :(


#30 of 122 by jp2 on Fri Dec 12 14:02:37 2003:

This response has been erased.



#31 of 122 by gelinas on Fri Dec 12 14:08:33 2003:

I'm sorry you've not heard the answer.  I know it's been offered:  Yes.


#32 of 122 by jp2 on Fri Dec 12 14:30:29 2003:

This response has been erased.



#33 of 122 by gull on Fri Dec 12 15:16:03 2003:

Re resp:24: I agree that things need to move forward.  I think that the
"the hardware will be obsolete!" argument is a red herring, though.  No
matter how long things sit, that hardware will still be less obsolete
than what Grex is running on now, and that's all that matters.  If we'd
put off buying the hardware there wouldn't even be the *possibility* of
moving forward.

Re resp:32: You'd have to ask Marcus, I think, and I haven't seen him
posting to coop recently.  What are you afraid will happen?  Who is
likely to come along and try to enforce the license terms?  If they
haven't cared yet, why are they likely to care now?


#34 of 122 by jp2 on Fri Dec 12 15:24:27 2003:

This response has been erased.



#35 of 122 by jp2 on Fri Dec 12 15:25:50 2003:

This response has been erased.



#36 of 122 by aruba on Fri Dec 12 15:34:59 2003:

I think gull's questions are pretty good ones.


#37 of 122 by gull on Fri Dec 12 16:09:46 2003:

My question in situations like this is always "who is getting hurt"?  If
the answer is "no one", I don't see what's immoral about it.


#38 of 122 by remmers on Fri Dec 12 16:10:55 2003:

But the issue of Picospan licensing has little or no relevance to the
topic of this item.


#39 of 122 by jp2 on Fri Dec 12 16:30:59 2003:

This response has been erased.



#40 of 122 by gull on Fri Dec 12 17:00:49 2003:

I think that's true if you assume "illegal" and "immoral" are synonyms.
 I personally don't.


#41 of 122 by tod on Fri Dec 12 17:49:37 2003:

This response has been erased.



#42 of 122 by mynxcat on Fri Dec 12 17:57:28 2003:

Right, as far as we know, the OS hasn't been installed yet...


#43 of 122 by cross on Fri Dec 12 18:35:40 2003:

The hardware, which was supposed to be bought with OpenBSD in mind,
isn't quite OpenBSD compatible.  In particular, the Ethernet controller
isn't very well supported.  There are really two ways to proceed.  Well,
three: 0) Fix OpenBSD so the hardware is supported (not going to happen).
1) Buy other hardware that is supported.  The SCSI controller had some
problems, too, but is probably fine.  The real issue is the ethernet;
a $20 Netgear card could be plugged into the machine and the onboard
ethernet ignored and the problem would be solved.  2) Switch to another
operating system.  I've always had my doubts that OpenBSD is the way
to go for grex.  The main argument in favor of it (that it's ``more
secure'') is BS; grex would be better off on FreeBSD, which supports
all the hardware it already has.

Oh, screw it; I'll build out next grex over the next month if someone will
take care of putting it on the network, and in the pumpkin.  If Valerie
and Jan don't have the time to work on it, then it should probably be
relocated to a place where someone with more time on their hands can
get to it.


#44 of 122 by gull on Fri Dec 12 18:41:23 2003:

Heck, a $12 RealTek card (you can get 'em at Sky-Tech on the corner of
Ellsworth and Carpenter for that, retail boxed) would do fine.  OpenBSD
should support these cards with the "rl" driver.

There *has* been some progress.  For example, janc spent a good bit of
time testing OpenBSD's software RAID feature.  Ultimately the tests
showed it hurt performance too much to make sense for Grex, but I don't
think we should discount the work that went into it.

I think FreeBSD can be just about as good as OpenBSD, security-wise, if
it's configured intelligently and kept up to date.  Most of the OpenBSD
security improvements are eventually ported to FreeBSD anyway.  Both are
damn good operating systems.


#45 of 122 by mynxcat on Fri Dec 12 18:43:22 2003:

Thanks for the offer cross :)


#46 of 122 by jp2 on Fri Dec 12 18:45:06 2003:

This response has been erased.



#47 of 122 by remmers on Fri Dec 12 18:49:43 2003:

To correct a misimpression that seems to be forming:  The OS was
installed on NextGrex months ago, and quite a bit of work was done
in terms of configuration and porting software.  The work has been
logged online, mostly in the Garage conference I think, some of it
in Coop.  What hasn't happened is *upgrading* the OS to the latest
version of OpenBSD.  There are good reasons for doing that, but it
isn't something that would hold up everything else.

Re #43: Wow Dan, that's quite an offer.  Thanks.


#48 of 122 by tod on Fri Dec 12 18:50:31 2003:

This response has been erased.



#49 of 122 by willcome on Fri Dec 12 19:31:37 2003:

Thanks, cross!


#50 of 122 by jp2 on Fri Dec 12 20:20:28 2003:

This response has been erased.



#51 of 122 by jep on Fri Dec 12 20:58:05 2003:

I agree I was harsh, but the fact is, this project has sat for 7 months 
now.  I don't agree that anything was gained by buying the hardware a 
long time before it was to be used.  I think if the money was sitting 
in the bank, or even still in Grexer's pockets, we'd be in the same 
place right now.

I don't even agree nothing was lost by the way things have gone.  I 
don't think I'm the only disappointed person on Grex.  The treasurer 
talks of how our cash in the bank is dwindling... but look how well 
money, even for a vitally important project, is used when it's received.

New hardware will improve things a *great* deal.  At least I hope it 
will.  It will if it's ever used to run Grex.

I'll cheer when it's time.  I often have in the past.  But for now, I 
won't apologize for saying I feel let down by the staff.


#52 of 122 by jep on Fri Dec 12 21:00:13 2003:

re resp:34: That's a heroic offer.  Thanks, Dan!  I hope it's accepted.


#53 of 122 by davel on Fri Dec 12 21:34:57 2003:

John, TBH, NextGrex looks to me to be moving along at least as fast as
previous upgrades have.  It really feels to me like you're carping, not
because you're saying that it should go faster, but because you keep saying
it over & over & over.

Volunteer time is always a bottleneck.  Trying to run a system, including
upgrades & maintenance, on the basis of consensus rather than in a top-down
manager-to-managed structure adds to the problem.

Frankly, if I were on staff & were one of those trying to move ahead on
this, I'd be resenting the sheer time taken up reading the responses of a
few individuals who apparently have endless time and nothing of importance
(IMNAAHO) to say. Heck, I do resent it as it is, & I'm not even seeing most
of their postings, I think.  (No, you're not one of those I'm referring to;
my first paragraph above isn't meant to say that I think you're in the twit
category.  If it sounds to you like that, email me & I'll try to be clearer.)


#54 of 122 by tod on Fri Dec 12 23:43:51 2003:

This response has been erased.



#55 of 122 by jep on Sat Dec 13 03:08:12 2003:

re resp:53: Sorry if you don't think I should speak up.  But not sorry 
enough to shut up.  If there are X people who think I shouldn't say 
what's on my mind, then there are X people who's opinion I don't care 
about.

I think there are many who disagree with me, but I think there are 
some who agree, too -- however graceless they might think me for 
saying it as bluntly as I did.

Look, I like Grex a whole lot.  I have read the statements from the 
treasurer over the last couple of years, as Grex went from 100 
supporters and a growing bank account to 80 supporters and a shrinking 
bank account.  Why do you think that is?  I have an idea that explains 
at least part of it.  I get frustrated when I wait for the system to 
do the next thing; go to the next conference or finish entering an 
item or whatever.  So must others.

Those users who left aren't going to come back, and the next dozen who 
leave aren't coming back, and it won't be long before Grex is where M-
Net is now.  (If there are 10 supporting users on M-Net, I'm 
surprised.)  Or where the old Arbornet was before that (there were 4 
users of Arbornet when it merged with M-Net).  I don't think the 
MextGrex hardware is depreciating as quickly as is Grex itself.

I want NextGrex for myself.  I want it because I think it's cool to 
think of Grex moving onto something a little less obsolete.  It's new, 
different, and exciting.  But there *is* a bigger picture as well.


#56 of 122 by jp2 on Sat Dec 13 03:22:00 2003:

This response has been erased.



#57 of 122 by mary on Sat Dec 13 13:10:40 2003:

Dan, that's a generous offer.  Please run it by staff, soon.


#58 of 122 by gull on Sat Dec 13 19:40:16 2003:

Re resp:55: Cracking the whip over volunteer staff people and saying,
"work harder, damn it!" generally isn't very effective, unless your goal
is to drive away volunteers.  Do you have any constructive suggestions,
or just complaints?


#59 of 122 by cross on Sat Dec 13 22:24:36 2003:

Regarding #57; I assume all the staff who want to participate are reading
this.


#60 of 122 by gelinas on Sun Dec 14 00:26:11 2003:

I suspect your assmption is faulty, Dan.  Unfortunately, for all concerned.


#61 of 122 by jep on Sun Dec 14 01:34:22 2003:

re resp:58:  Do you know how long we went between *mentions* of 
NextGrex in the coop conference?  We went from July to October, when I 
brought up the subject again.  And the mentions in June and July 
weren't substantive, as I recall them.

Constructive?  I don't have any attaboys, no.

I think we should listen more to cross, if he'll come back to the 
staff at all.  I think we need to go with stock Unix, not customized 
code only a couple of people can administer -- because those couple of 
people haven't been available for a while.

I think Grex shouldn't be allowed to wither on the vine because of 
overdependence on people who aren't interested in it any more.

Do *you* have *anything* to contribute?  Or just "Shut up, jep"?

re 59-60: I suspect it's a matter of definition of "want to 
participate".


#62 of 122 by glenda on Sun Dec 14 03:12:24 2003:

I thought that there is on going stuff about NextGrex in the Garage cf, not
here.


#63 of 122 by jep on Sun Dec 14 04:04:52 2003:

View "hidden" response.



#64 of 122 by jep on Sun Dec 14 04:05:23 2003:

Oops.

Through May, there was extensive discussion of everything happening 
with NextGrex here in coop.  Then it abruptly stopped.


#65 of 122 by naftee on Sun Dec 14 04:53:21 2003:

BOOM
 NextGreX


#66 of 122 by willcome on Sun Dec 14 06:20:26 2003:

Did you boom NextGreX?


#67 of 122 by gull on Sun Dec 14 16:07:57 2003:

Re resp:61: I didn't ask for "attaboys".  I asked for constructive
comments, i.e. ones that include suggestions for how to move forward. 
"That damn volunteer staff is lazy" seems to be your only comment so
far, and it's not constructive or helpful.


#68 of 122 by davel on Sun Dec 14 18:53:20 2003:

And John, as I said, my objection to it is that you keep saying it, over &
over & over.  I guess what David (gull) just said is relevant, though; if you
were offering constructive suggestions or offering to help along with this
it wouldn't sound so much like carping.  (I offer as an example cross, who
has complained quite a bit about the rate of progress from time to time, but
who's been involved & (AFAICS) quite helpful.


#69 of 122 by cross on Sun Dec 14 21:17:26 2003:

Regarding #60; Fair enough, Joe; can you help me spread the word?  The
critical people to get hold of right now are Jan and Valerie, since the
hardware is physically in their possession.


#70 of 122 by gelinas on Mon Dec 15 03:49:29 2003:

I'll see what I can do.


#71 of 122 by jep on Mon Dec 15 05:47:07 2003:

I guess I disagree with davel and gull in that I think there are valid 
reasons to complain.  Maybe you fellows will come up with a schedule 
under which I may complain again with your permission?  I inquired in 
October and was told "wait a month".  I waited two months before 
complaining.

I don't have the time or expertise needed to make NextGrex.  That is 
why I never said I'd do it.

Dan Cross has stated the project can be simplified to the point where 
any Unix system administrator could understand it, instead of only one 
person, by eliminating weird custom password code and suchlike.  I 
endorse that concept.  Grex will be a lot more secure with standard 
Unix software than it ever will when relying on one person.

While I don't have the expertise to build NextGrex, I do have Unix 
knowledge and ability which could conceivably help.  I was on the 
staff of M-Net for several years.  I am the Unix root at work on some 
machines, though for maintenance purposes only.  I'm the go-to guy in 
customer support for Unix information.  I'm willing to help out Grex 
and/or NextGrex where I can.  I won't be designing any software but 
there are times when I could log in and test things, or clean up after 
busier and more expert people, etc.  I'm pretty good at 
documentation.  I don't expect the staff to take me up on it, but if 
they do, I'll help out where I can.

If it counts at all toward your definition of "helping", davel, I also 
contributed money to the new hardware project a year ago.  I really 
don't regard myself as destructively jeering.  


#72 of 122 by mary on Mon Dec 15 22:51:57 2003:

I'd like to explain, in a bit more detail, why I brought this up in the
first place. 

Jobs for programmers are tight right now.  Or so I've heard, right here on
Grex, from programmers.  I think it was Jan who said he's been forced to
take work at a much reduced fee, to get the contract.  That means he's
working more hours to make the same income to meet his bills. Yuck.

I don't think it's just Jan that's been caught in this squeeze.  I think
it's a lot of our volunteer staff. Then you throw in the usual family
obligations that all of us have, some more than others, and before you
know it, Grex projects are on the back burner.  In the past our staff has
been very generous with their time.  I think they'll be generous again,
when they're able. 

So maybe it is both practical and realistic to think of jump starting the
project by paying for the next few hours of work.  And that's all it would
be, the next few hours.  Just enough to get past this bottleneck.  Then
(cross fingers) maybe voluteers with more time could pickup the slack. 
But we'll have to see how that goes.  But any progress right now would be
an upper for the whole project. 

I hope it works that Dan can get things going before he leaves.  But, if
not, I'd like this to be considered.



#73 of 122 by cross on Mon Dec 15 23:02:09 2003:

I don't think it's very practical.  It's a noble gesture, to be sure, but
realistically grex isn't going to be able to afford much time from anyone.
What I think is realistic, and necessary, is to get an operating system
loaded onto the hardware we have that's *stable* and get the hardware into
the pumpkin.  After that, most of the work with getting nextgrex running
is really just turning the crank.


#74 of 122 by bhoward on Mon Dec 15 23:35:58 2003:

I believe there are grexers willing and capable of helping finish off the
configuration of nextgrex if we can simply get it on line and accessable
via the net.  I'm happy to help out, I believe others have made the same
offer.

If Dan can help with the first part, I think amongst the lot of us,
we can sort out the rest.


#75 of 122 by jp2 on Tue Dec 16 00:00:47 2003:

This response has been erased.



#76 of 122 by gull on Tue Dec 16 00:24:39 2003:

I guess the job market isn't tight where jp2 is. ;>


#77 of 122 by jp2 on Tue Dec 16 00:40:30 2003:

This response has been erased.



#78 of 122 by mynxcat on Tue Dec 16 00:46:32 2003:

Re 75> Would it have been worth the fie bucks?


#79 of 122 by jp2 on Tue Dec 16 01:09:27 2003:

This response has been erased.



#80 of 122 by cross on Tue Dec 16 04:07:03 2003:

(What he doesn't mention is that he was paying five dollars, not receiving.)


#81 of 122 by naftee on Tue Dec 16 04:35:46 2003:

fie those dollars.


#82 of 122 by jp2 on Tue Dec 16 11:09:46 2003:

This response has been erased.



#83 of 122 by mynxcat on Tue Dec 16 17:51:22 2003:

This response has been erased.



#84 of 122 by mynxcat on Tue Dec 16 17:54:13 2003:

RE 80> I'm not sure I feel so good anymore. 


#85 of 122 by glenda on Tue Dec 16 18:40:22 2003:

The real sad thing in all of this is that NextGrex was originally supposed
to come to our house for set up, with STeve and Marcus working on it and them
guiding me through most of the work.  This was going to help me out with my
education in Computer Science, to have yet another person familiar with the
set up, to see if I could handle it and therefore set me up as another staff
member to do regular backups, etc.  I even cleared space for it to be worked
on.  Then for some reason un-named person(s) felt that the approach that STeve
and Marcus planned for getting it up and running was going to take too long
and took it off on the other track.

I was gung ho on doing this.  I was looking forward to working with them and
furthering my education.  I want NextGrex as much as everyone else and would
have been here, onsite so to speak, to goad STeve and Marcus into getting it
done.  Chances are we would have been up and running a while ago.

STeve felt that after all the work he did to find the compents and reasonable
prices for them and getting everything ordered, and then having it pulled away
saying that the plan he and Marcus came up with was too conservative was a
slap in the face.  I had to do a lot of fast talking to stop him from pulling
away from Grex completely.  He has still been working on things, but is less
willing to put family and work life on hold than he was before.  And I really
can't blame him for feeling that way.  Grex has been a time sink for him ever
since they started about the concept of Grex.  It has taken a lot of his time
away from his family.  It has occasionally taken time away from work.  We have
fought about Grex coming first more times than I can count.  He has been proud
of being a part of Grex.  Don't blame him or Marcus for being hold ups in
getting NextGrex up and running.


#86 of 122 by tod on Tue Dec 16 19:07:46 2003:

This response has been erased.



#87 of 122 by flem on Tue Dec 16 19:27:51 2003:

Okay, this is gonna come out wrong I'm sure, but please be assured I
don't mean anything negative;  this is serious advice.  

If you're serious about furthering your education in the computer
industry, one of the most important things to learn in order to maintain
your sanity is how to distance yourself from your projects.  It's easy
for those of us who care about doing things right to become personally
attached to our projects, and to take it personally when control is
taken out of our hands.  I've lost count of the number of times  that a
project I was looking forward to working on was handed to someone else,
someone who I felt wouldn't do as good a job, because they had more
available time to work on it than I did.  It's hard, but sometimes it's
the best thing for the project.  
  Jep (I think it was him) once said something that has stuck with me: 
If the data on your computer is less important than the computer itself,
then your computer is a toy, not a tool.  Without belaboring the
comparison too heavily, NextGrex can't be anyone's toy.  It's a real
project, with real constraints.  One of those constraints is time. 
Exactly who does the work, in what space, and whether or not they learn
anything from it -- well, I'm sorry, but those just aren't constraints
for this project.  


#88 of 122 by aruba on Tue Dec 16 19:46:48 2003:

Glenda - I'm sorry that STeve's feelings were hurt.  His weren't the only
ones.  I'm certain no one wanted that to happen.

The board and staff chose a strategy which we thought had the best chance
to get the system up quickly.  It may have been a mistake - no one can say
for sure.  But I still think we did what was for the best. 

BTW, you can name me if you like.


#89 of 122 by willcome on Tue Dec 16 20:19:44 2003:

HEYM EVERONE< IT"S ARUBA"S FAULT!  HEY EVERYONE!  LE"TS BLAE ARUA


#90 of 122 by jep on Tue Dec 16 21:45:26 2003:

I am sure it seems like I, for one, have been trying to blame someone, 
but that's really not where I am coming from.  I don't care who works 
on NextGrex.  I am disgruntled that it's not being done.

We need to be able to have Grex, and Nextgrex, even if two people -- 
*any* two people -- are not available, interested, capable, well-
disposed, or happy.  The responses from glenda and aruba seem to show 
very clearly why.

De-centralize Grex.  It can be run well by other knowledgeable people, 
even if it's not done as brilliantly as if Marcus and STeve are 
involved.  I don't think we need brilliance much, not right now.  We 
need reliability.


#91 of 122 by mynxcat on Tue Dec 16 22:04:01 2003:

I tend to agree with flem on this. Working in the IT industry, there 
are numerous times pet projects are taken away from you and givn to 
someone else.

And Glenda, if Grex was already a time-sink for STeve, maybe it is a 
good thing that someone else got to work on it, instead of two of you 
working on it all of your free time.


#92 of 122 by tod on Tue Dec 16 22:48:29 2003:

This response has been erased.



#93 of 122 by gelinas on Tue Dec 16 23:24:01 2003:

Planning has begun for a weekend Next Grex Fun Fest, either later this
month or early next.  The goal is to get Next Grex as near to up as we can.


#94 of 122 by aruba on Wed Dec 17 01:22:46 2003:

That's great, Joe.  Please keep us informed.


#95 of 122 by glenda on Wed Dec 17 02:39:21 2003:

I'm sorry, I didn't make myself completely clear.

I meant that I find it ironic it was felt that STeve's and Marcus's approach
to getting NextGrex up was too time consuming.  It was felt that in doing so
NextGrex would be up faster...  If we had followed the path that they had
planned, it would be up and running by now.

As for it being educational for me.  I was looking forward to it.  I am not
very disappointed.  I will still get that education in putting up an OpenBSD
box for myself, pretty much with the same equipment that NextGrex is using.
It is just that if I had done it with NextGrex I would have been pushed to
do it.  Doing it for my own box will wait until I get around to-it.  All I
have at the moment is rectangular and triangular to-its :-)  It would have
been interesting and I was looking forward to helping Grex in that manner.
Oh, well, so it goes.

I had meant to point out that the time sink of Grex on STeve's part was more
of a:  If Grex needed his services, he would do his best to be there to
provide them even if it meant other aspects of life had to go on hold for a
bit.  The big things did't/don't bother me.  I love Grex and want what is best
for it, if it takes my husband away at times I accept it.  What bothers me
is that STeve can become all-consumed by things.  I.e. I am going up to bed,
he says he will be along in a minute and finally comes up 2-4 hours later.
When I ask why, it is because he found something or was doing some little
thing that led to another on Grex.  He didn't realize how long he spent doing
"some little thing," he looses all track of time when doing something he cares
about.  This is one of the reasons I fell in love with him.  It can, however,
get aggravating at times.  Especially when being awakened in the wee morning
hours by a husband that should have already been asleep.


#96 of 122 by cross on Wed Dec 17 03:25:48 2003:

Glenda, you don't need physical access to the nextgrex hardware in order
to work on it; if you're still interested, I'm sure arrangements can be
made for you to access it remotely.


#97 of 122 by naftee on Fri Dec 19 04:40:09 2003:

NextGreX.


#98 of 122 by janc on Sun Dec 21 18:35:57 2003:

I have only skimmed the above.

Paying me would make little difference in the short term.  I have a contract,
I can't really take on another until this one is done.  It might prevent me
from having to take another contract immediately after this one comes along
(assuming that one is offered to me), but only if you are paying a competitive
rate, and frankly, Grex can't afford that.  The work I've done so far this
morning would have cost Grex most of it's income for the month.  It's also
unnecessary.  I want to work on Grex.  Given some decent blocks of free time,
I will.

I'm very disappointed with the time it has taken for things to get done.  The
system got built fast.  The OS was installed, and I installed my nearly all
of my software quickly too.  Then we spent months waiting around for others
to do anything.  I was supposed to install OpenBSD 3.4 about a month ago. 
It took me longer than I expected to get around to it, but it's done now.
I don't honestly believe that anyone was waiting for me to install OpenBSD
3.4.

I'm pretty pleased that I was able to install OpenBSD and reinstall all the
software that I'd previously installed and all the software that Dan
Gryniewicz had installed in just two working days.  Everything is documented
and most of the installation steps are scripted.  This pass through things
required various fixes to the install scripts, and I did much improvement
of hte documentation, but it went pretty well all in all.  My goal is to
eventually get to the point where a new Grex can be built from a bare machine,
a net connection and the cvs archive by one person in 24 hours.

Some of the work that was done on the old new Grex was not documented.  This
includes the 'pf' config, the quotas, and the login mods to allow Grex
style passwords to be used.  My next task is to try to figure out what was
done and get documented and back up.

I guess I also need to talk to Marcus.

I'm not sure what to say to Glenda's comments.  NextGrex should have been up
by now, certainly.  If there was ever a plan to house NextGrex at STeve's
house, I never heard about it.  My thinking was that once it was on the net,
it didn't much matter where it was, as anyone anywhere could connect to it.
The advantage of my house is that there are two Grex staffers living and
working here, so there is someone available to do reboots nearly 24x7x365.
I guess the handling of all that resulted in STeve and Glenda being a bit
put out.  I'm sorry about that.  I'd certainly do anything in my power to
make it possible for them to contribute to this effort.


#99 of 122 by gelinas on Sun Dec 21 19:49:26 2003:

I kept a copy of the pf information on my own machine, just in case I never
got it properly committed in cvs.

I'll transfer it back to the new grex machine later today.


#100 of 122 by cross on Sun Dec 21 20:00:54 2003:

The login.conf stuff was done by me, and is simple.  I'll write up
documentation for it.


#101 of 122 by naftee on Sun Dec 21 22:08:06 2003:

Which'll probably be skimmed.


#102 of 122 by janc on Mon Dec 22 06:02:23 2003:

Dan:  I looked in your directory, found the login.conf stuff and
installed it and documented it.  You're right it was simple.  (And, I think,
the correct solution).


#103 of 122 by gelinas on Mon Dec 22 07:43:19 2003:

I've now moved the pf.conf back on to the new grex machine, worked it over
some more to get it closer to what we need, and enabled it.  I've also
moved over a copy of the document I wrote way back when.  All of this has
now been committed to CVS.


#104 of 122 by janc on Mon Dec 22 16:54:52 2003:

Great.  Thanks.


#105 of 122 by naftee on Tue Dec 23 08:28:06 2003:

Thanks Joe!!


#106 of 122 by dpc on Mon Jan 5 22:01:00 2004:

If NextGrex had been up last Sunday (1/4) would the mail disk have
died?  I thought we were replacing the disks; I may have been wrong.


#107 of 122 by aruba on Mon Jan 5 23:10:51 2004:

Yes, NextGrex has all new disks.


#108 of 122 by gelinas on Mon Jan 5 23:43:14 2004:

We had hoped the mail disk would survive until the new grex machine went into
service.  It didn't. :(


#109 of 122 by willcome on Tue Jan 6 02:29:29 2004:

Why didn't someone anticipate this, and replace the disc BEFORE it broke?


#110 of 122 by albaugh on Tue Jan 6 06:12:09 2004:

Did my eyes deceive me, or was it not the *controller* that died and not the
"disk" (media)?


#111 of 122 by willcome on Tue Jan 6 06:34:46 2004:

Did your eyes conceive ye?


#112 of 122 by gelinas on Tue Jan 6 06:37:44 2004:

They replaced the logic board of the drive itself, Kevin.


#113 of 122 by davel on Tue Jan 6 14:20:25 2004:

... but it was not a head crash or other damage to the platter or head.


#114 of 122 by dpc on Tue Jan 6 21:06:12 2004:

I think we should pay to get NextGrex up before we have *another*
disaster.  We may not be so lucky next time.


#115 of 122 by kip on Sun Jan 11 18:55:11 2004:

Speaking as a staffer who did spend a chuck of two nights getting mail back
up on Grex last week, I haven't had a lot of personal time to spend on
NextGrex.  

Those of you who know my professional life know that I have been
consumed by work on the new Malletts Creek Branch for the AADL.  I and my 
coworkers have been writing new circulation software and setting up a new 
class of thin clients for the patrons to use at this new branch.  Not to
mention the fun of having to go through three different connectivity methods
to get this branch connected to the rest of the library.

Those of you who know my personal life know that my partner, Tracey, suffered
a venous ischemia during a resection of two brain tumors in September and has
had a difficult recovery requiring much of my remaining attention.

Now, writing today, the day after the new branch opening, I have a few days
of tweaking work to do, and Tracey's rehab therapy is coming along nicely.

I'd like to think my life will finally slow down enough to pay more attention
to NextGrex and get it up and running.  Those of you who doubt my dedication
or wish to poke fun at this idea need to remember that it was myself and Jan 
who stayed up late at night and recovered Grex's email last week.  I think 
I've made my point.

Please give our current staff a little more time.


#116 of 122 by keesan on Sun Jan 11 20:07:38 2004:

My best wishes to Tracey and please take whatever time you need to do it
right.


#117 of 122 by aruba on Mon Jan 12 03:48:29 2004:

I certainly feel the same way, Kip.  I'm glad Tracey is feeling better.


#118 of 122 by jep on Mon Jan 12 05:49:49 2004:

My goodness.  Yes, I agree with Sindi and Mark.  I apologize for my 
critical remarks in this item and others.  I sure didn't mean to 
criticize anyone dealing with such circumstances as those.  Best 
wishes to Tracey!


#119 of 122 by dpc on Wed Jan 28 16:25:40 2004:

You are certainly not the problem with the delay of NextGrex, kip.
You did outstanding work for Grex *and* in your day job with the
Library.


#120 of 122 by gregb on Thu Apr 1 16:00:32 2004:

Unfortunately, it's all to easy to forget--especailly for newcomers--
that Grex is all done by volunteers.  They don't /have/ to do this.  
The fact that Grex has lasted this long is certainly a testiment to the 
staff's dedication.


#121 of 122 by tod on Thu Apr 1 16:06:39 2004:

And egoes ;)


#122 of 122 by jesuit on Wed May 17 02:14:28 2006:

TROGG IS DAVID BLAINE


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: