Grex Oldcoop Conference

Item 358: Member initative: Stop paying for dial-up

Entered by scholar on Mon Sep 4 04:34:36 2006:

I am a member in good standing, and this is a member initative.

Here's the proposal:  Cyberspace Inc. will cease to pay to provide dial-up
access to Grex.
52 responses total.

#1 of 52 by steve on Mon Sep 4 04:36:33 2006:

   Why?


#2 of 52 by scholar on Mon Sep 4 04:38:16 2006:

The dial-up lines cost Grex about half as much as the colocation fee, yet
support many fewer users, and there's no doubt they could continue to access
Grex if the lines were cut off.

I endorse taking this proposal to vote.


#3 of 52 by scholar on Mon Sep 4 04:39:14 2006:

re. 1: slip.


#4 of 52 by steve on Mon Sep 4 04:41:54 2006:

   What about the people who don't have net access already?  It's certainly
a shrinking number; at one time we had what, 13 lines, but I question if we
should kill them alltogether.  There will be a time when we can phase them
out, yes, but are we there yet?


#5 of 52 by scholar on Mon Sep 4 04:44:23 2006:

How many dial-up lines are there right now?


#6 of 52 by aruba on Mon Sep 4 17:42:08 2006:

We currently have 2 dialup lines.

Providing dialup access is a significant part of Grex's charitable mission,
and part of what we reported to the IRS when we applied for tax-exempt
status.  So removing the dialup lines would mean telling the IRS that we no
longer provide access to the internet for people in the Ann Arbor area who
cannot otherwise afford it, and it could mean losing our 501(c)3 status.

So I will vote to keep dialin access, if this goes to a vote.


#7 of 52 by kingjon on Mon Sep 4 17:45:07 2006:

As will I.



#8 of 52 by cross on Mon Sep 4 22:33:34 2006:

Regarding #1; Cost vs. benefit.

Regarding #6; It could, but I would tend to doubt it.  Grex has lots of other
things going for it.


#9 of 52 by tod on Tue Sep 5 04:11:38 2006:

re #6
Isn't Ivars in the process of getting wifi throughout all of Ann Arbor?
What's the point of dialup then?


#10 of 52 by aruba on Tue Sep 5 04:18:10 2006:

Dunno, maybe none.  But wifi isn't all over Washtenaw County yet, and when
it is I doubt it will be free.


#11 of 52 by tod on Tue Sep 5 07:27:02 2006:

"Late last week, the Washtenaw County Board approved Wireless Washtenaw
Advisory Board's recommendation of 20/20 Communications to cover the entire
county with wireless by the end of 2007. This includes Ann Arbor, the home
of University of Michigan and future home of Google's Adwords division. The
wireless network will be free for speeds up to 85kbps and $35/month for
500kbps. 20/20 Communications estimates it will take around 6,000 radios to
cover the county.

This initiative is being funded without taxpayer dollars and is one of the
most ambitious wireless deployments in the U.S. Will it succeed or will it
fail? Check out the county's wireless website for updates on the project."
   -by Hemos on Mon Aug 07, '06 

http://wireless.ewashtenaw.org/
Wireless Washtenaw is a county community coming together to provide free or
lower-cost access to the Internet for anyone in Washtenaw County, regardless
of their location or economic status. Perhaps the most exciting aspect of
Wireless Washtenaw is that the extraordinary collaboration of the private and
public sectors will mean that this wireless network will be available
county-wide, with no taxpayer dollars spent on its construction, maintenance,
and operation.


#12 of 52 by nharmon on Tue Sep 5 12:23:26 2006:

Yeah, but me thinks there will still be an excuse for not getting rid of
the modems.


#13 of 52 by aruba on Tue Sep 5 13:23:05 2006:

THanks for the news, Tod.  On the contrary, Narthan, if that's really in
place by 2007, and it works and covers all of Grex's local calling area, I
don't see any point in having dial-in lines anymore.  But if we drop them,
we'll have to update with the IRS, and I do think there's a possibility
we'll lose our 501(c)3 status.  I don't really know what the odds are.


#14 of 52 by nharmon on Tue Sep 5 14:08:25 2006:

Mark, while you probably wouldn't do this, I do see people fighting to
keep dialup access alive.


#15 of 52 by tod on Tue Sep 5 17:12:02 2006:

Its a matter of board responsibility to assume fiduciary responsibility.  If
part of that means managing expenses wisely then perhaps the board should
revisit the logic behind the dialups.  It might make more sense to align Grex
with the WifiMax initiative.


#16 of 52 by remmers on Tue Sep 5 17:23:10 2006:

The Board does monitor dialin line usage and has been dropping the
number of dialins as demand has dropped.  Since they're the ones who
have the fiduciary responsibility, as Todd points out, and have been
conscientious about it, I think it makes more sense to leave the
decisions re dialin lines in the board's hands rather than make a member
initiative out of it.  So I won't endorse taking this proposal to a
member vote.


#17 of 52 by tod on Tue Sep 5 18:14:45 2006:

Where can members view records of line usage?


#18 of 52 by steve on Tue Sep 5 18:35:44 2006:

   The last command.  The tty's are 00 and 01.  Not looking very
completely I think we have about 53 accounts that have used the
dialins this year, with seven of them being members as of right
now.  Given our local user base, I'd say thats significant.  We
probably want to stare at the usage more closely and see if we
should take one of the lines down, but it sure looks like we 
have folks using the dialins now.

   Remember, we've shaved lines off before.  I believe we were
at 13 dialins at one point, with several reductions in that 
number over time.  As technology changes, so does Grex (slowly).
The wireless plan for coverage of Washtenaw county may be a
real change for us, who knows.


#19 of 52 by krj on Tue Sep 5 19:00:47 2006:

Probably the question will be, how cheap/feasible will wireless
access be for users of obsolete/salvaged computers?


#20 of 52 by tod on Tue Sep 5 19:04:07 2006:

re #18
Thanks STeve

re #19
USB wifi isn't too mysterious


#21 of 52 by kingjon on Tue Sep 5 20:11:22 2006:

Re #20 par. 2: My one experience with USB wifi is that it isn't all that fast
when it works at all, requires much shifting of reception hardware to be able
to get a signal at all, and requires some driver configuration. Beyond that,
the sort of people who are dialing in exclusively are possibly using computers
without USB ports.



#22 of 52 by tod on Tue Sep 5 20:53:10 2006:

For the love of everything decent in the world, why would people waste so much
electricity running any dinosaur that doesn't at least have a USB port let
alone one that relies on a dialup modem?


#23 of 52 by krj on Tue Sep 5 20:56:15 2006:

Because they got it for free off the corner, or from a friend.


#24 of 52 by cmcgee on Tue Sep 5 21:54:40 2006:

I know of at least 3 regular contributors to Grex who are limited to that kind
of equipment.


#25 of 52 by tod on Tue Sep 5 22:58:53 2006:

Maybe Grex should redirect some resources from paying for dialup to donating
newer equipment to the needy?


#26 of 52 by naftee on Tue Sep 5 23:16:50 2006:

re 22 I have a couple of those dinosaurs at home.


#27 of 52 by saw on Wed Sep 6 15:16:27 2006:

Here's a possible idea: Can we use an existing dial-up provider's
terminal server(s) to allow users to dial in and telnet to Grex
that way?

I know it's (technically) possible.  At my last job (admin at a
dial-up ISP about 4 or 5 years ago) I did just this.  I used it
for business customers who wanted UUCP over modem.  (They would
dial into our terminal server, log in with an assigned username
and password, and our terminal server would patch them over to the
UUCP port on our mail machine -- no PPP or SLIP involved.)

We were running 3com Total Control HiPer ARC.

I even set up an account that would telnet you to my personal Linux
server.  You could dial in with HyperTerminal, log in to this account,
and it would immediately telnet you over there.  I even did this when
traveling, using our (outsourced through MegaPOP) nationwide access
numbers.  I could dial into MegaPOP's server using HyperTerminal, login
with this account, and the MegaPOP terminal server would telnet me to
my server.

If I recall correctly, it was a matter of using some special RADIUS
attributes to make it work.  But it did.

The real question here would be price as compared to what is being paid 
now for the two modem lines.  Potentially, Grex could go as far as using 
MegaPOP (or some similar service) to do this, and providing nationwide 
dialup (terminal based -- not PPP) access to Grex.  Or, possibly just use 
a local ISP?

The major difference (for end-users) is going to be that they will have to 
deal with two logins and passwords.  The first to log into the ISP's 
terminal server (and obtain a connection to Grex), and second with their 
actual Grex login.

Just thought I would mention it.


#28 of 52 by tod on Wed Sep 6 19:21:43 2006:

re #27
Yea, Grex could totally point people towards Merit or MichNet if there was
a relationship there.


#29 of 52 by steve on Wed Sep 6 21:17:03 2006:

   I don't think anyone would touch the contracting of two modems.
However, its worth the cost of an email to Provide.net, our ISP.


#30 of 52 by saw on Thu Sep 7 15:21:08 2006:

Right.  I wouldn't expect anyone to entertain the idea of contracting
for just two modems.  When we were researching nationwide dial-up
providers, a lot of them had insane minimum commitments.  At least,
insane for us.  We were a (relatively) small ISP, most of our customers 
were local -- and we just wanted to provide a convenient way for them
to use the service when traveling.

I was thinking along the lines of Grex leveraging some ISP's existing 
infrastructure.  It would eliminate the need for Grex to pay for two 
dedicated lines (which probably sit unused most of the time.)  It would 
also potentially (assuming that the provider doesn't limit the number of 
simultaneous logins to the account) allow Grex to have more than 2 users 
dialed in at any given time.  Obviously, dial-up demand has decrased over 
the years -- I have personally seen Grex go from 13 lines down to 2.  
However, for the rare instance that 3, 4, or even 5 people want to dial in 
at the same time, this could be handy.

I agree that Provide.net is probably the best place to ask first, since 
Grex already has a relationship with them.


#31 of 52 by keesan on Tue Sep 26 19:17:30 2006:

I dial in to grex several times a day and get a busy signal maybe once a month
so one line should be enough, except that one of the two modems is sometimes
not working.

What does a non-pcmcia wireless ethernet card cost new, or used? 
The linux I use would need a different kernel to support wireless but I could
probably figure it out.   How stable is a wireless connection?  Would it work
in a house with metal roof and aluminum vapor barrier?  The neighbor offered
to let us attempt to connect to his for practice.  My linux does not support
USB but does support ethernet connections to a DSL modem (I have used it that
way via ethernet cable).  


#32 of 52 by cross on Tue Sep 26 19:25:43 2006:

There are access points you can get that sort of act as "boosters" to the
signal; the access point would "connect" to the wireless network, and then
you could run ethernet from there to a switch or cheap hub to conenct your
machines.


#33 of 52 by keesan on Wed Sep 27 02:02:53 2006:

Re 32, are you saying I would buy an access point, put it where the signal
was stronger outside the house, and then run cable inside to a hub?  (Which
I presume would have to stay powered on all the time).  I have never set up
anything wireless.  Our closest attempt at a network was via nullmodem cable
and required both computers to be running in order for the second one to go
online.


#34 of 52 by cross on Wed Sep 27 02:19:17 2006:

Yeah, pretty much.


#35 of 52 by keesan on Wed Sep 27 02:25:05 2006:

What software do I need to run to access the hub from my linux computer?  Do
I get an IP number for the hub or access point?


#36 of 52 by cross on Wed Sep 27 02:32:34 2006:

The hub is just a dumb piece of electronics; you plug ethernet cables into
it, and then cables into the ethernet adapter in your computer.  In most home
setups, there's a router that also has a builtin DHCP server that will hand
out IP addresses.


#37 of 52 by mcnally on Wed Sep 27 03:29:11 2006:

The type of device you want is often called a wireless bridge.

Some cheap access points support the functionality with replacement
homebrew firmware that you can download from the internet -- that's
probably more economical than paying for a device designed for the
purpose because economies of scale make designing, marketing, and
selling the much more popular access points cheaper than the fairly
uncommon bridge devices.


#38 of 52 by twenex on Wed Sep 27 13:08:23 2006:

The only software you need is the driver for the network card.
Linux-compatible network cards are usually supported by the kernel by default
anyway.

Of course, with that minimalist linux you run you might have to (re-)compile
the kernel with the right driver.


#39 of 52 by keesan on Thu Sep 28 01:49:33 2006:

I have linux support for all the network cards that I am using in my
computers, and I have a few hubs (I can connect two computers via
non-crossover cables plugged into the powered-on hub).  What do I plug the
hub into and does that also need power?  A router with software in it?

I use the same linux kernel for various computers, and insmod the module for
the network card (rtl8139 or tulip or 3c59x...).  Then use ifconfig to assign
an address to my own computer.


#40 of 52 by cross on Thu Sep 28 02:45:36 2006:

That's right.  You would get a router that runs some software, though usually
it sort of comes built-in.  Or, someone else would run the router and you'd
just have the wireless access point (that would be plugged in, yes) that would
sort of bridge wirelessly to the network of the person who had the router.


#41 of 52 by nharmon on Thu Sep 28 10:40:54 2006:

Here is a diagram:

<PC>
 |
<Hub>-------<Wireless AP> ) ) ) )      ( ( ( ( <Wireless Router>-.
 |                                                               |
<PC>                                                    <Cable/DSL Modem>



#42 of 52 by keesan on Thu Sep 28 15:10:27 2006:

The neighbor has a router, and apparently Washtenaw County will have the
equivalent.  What does a 'wireless access point' look like?  We have a variety
of things people gave us over the years into which we can plug ethernet
cables, some of them labelled ADSL, some of them with antenna.  There is
something that came in a box and has an antenna, and also came with a pcmcia
wireless ethernet card and a CD for Windows.  Is that a hub or a router or
an AP?  Jim's son has something with an antenna that picks up a signal that
is then fed to a desktop wireless ethernet card - is that an AP?  If so, I
will ask him more about them.  What would a new or used one cost?

Sort of a nuisance having to plug in two extra gadgets every time you want
to go online, which might be in another part of the house (or leave two power
adaptors running all the time wasting energy).  Except for downloading large
files we are happy with dialup and it is more stable.


#43 of 52 by nharmon on Thu Sep 28 15:32:53 2006:

A wireless access point looks like a modem with an ethernet jack, power
jack, and one or two antennas. As for the things you have laying around,
if you give us some make/models or model numbers, we might be able to help.


#44 of 52 by keesan on Fri Sep 29 04:30:15 2006:

I will (tomorrow) dig out anything with an antenna and power supply that is
not a radio.  After we finishing sorting and freezing Chinese chestnuts. 
First things first.  What would a new wireless access point cost?  We
currently pay nothing for dialup service and are happy with it.


#45 of 52 by nharmon on Fri Sep 29 11:10:44 2006:

Maybe around $20? for a Linksys WAP11 (802.11b). That is just a guess.
But if you're happy with dialup, then what the heck? :-)


#46 of 52 by keesan on Fri Sep 29 13:44:11 2006:

We have a Wireless -B Network Kit Router + Notebook Adapter.  The bigger
gadget has two antennas and a power supply cube and also in back four ethernet
ports plus a fifth one with an ethernet cable in it.   24GHz.  Linksys
broadband router.   Is this something that can both pick up and broadcast
wireless signals, or just pick up signals over the included ethernet cable
and then give you a choice of broadcasting them to a laptop computer or
plugging in four desktop computers without an additional hub?  The wireless
card worked for someone in their laptop but not for us even with Win98,
however the BIOS was screwed up at the time and we fixed it since (the modem
would not work either in Windows, and does now).  All-In-One Wireless Internet
Sharing Solution from teh Worldwide Leader in Wireless Networking!  Intended
to share your high-speed internet connection with wired and wireless computers.
Built-in 4-port Ethernet Switch and Wireless Access Point... Rates up to 11
MBps.  I don't know why it was given to us, maybe they got a faster one?

If this is what we need to pick up a wireless signal and get it to a desktop
computer via ethernet cable, how would we use it with linux?
We have a Windows CD for the router and for the PCMCIA card. Does Windows
transfer the software to the router?


#47 of 52 by nharmon on Fri Sep 29 14:20:10 2006:

I would say it is likely they got a faster one. I gave my mom my
wireless B router after I upgraded. The router (bigger gadget) is
designed to be connected to a broadband modem (cable or DSL), and then
share that connection to a variety of computers. However, I am not sure
if that router is able to act as a wireless bridge.

Here is how you can use it: Plug the device. In the back there is a
reset button you may been a paperclip to push. Push and hold for 30
seconds to reset the router's configuration. Plug a computer into one of
the ethernet ports, but not the port labeled "WAN". Said computer should
be configured to obtain an IP address using DHCP. Most likely, you will
get an address of 192.168.1.something. You will want to use a web
browser and go to 192.168.1.1 (or whatever the DHCP sets as your default
gateway). I forget the default username/password, its something like
'admin' and no password, or no username with password 'admin', you might
need to experiment.

Once you get into the configuration screen you should be able to find
out if it will work as a wireless bridge.

If you have any more questions, feel free to post them to the new
jellyware conference. :)


#48 of 52 by keesan on Fri Sep 29 16:24:38 2006:

I phoned MCRS who said I needed a bridge, and not what we have (which is
designed to broadcast but not receive a wireless signal).  And that a wired
connection was much more stable than wireless.  I can run dhcp in linux and
have plugged my own computer into someone's router and used it, but we have
nothing to plug the router into.  The paper documentation for our gadget
mentioned nothing about picking up a wireless signal.  We will continue trying
to make the wireless pcmcia card work in Windows so we can at least download
large files at the library.  Or maybe they have a working USB port now to plug
our 64MB memory stick into.   The neighbor may not actually have a wireless
setup, he was just thinking about setting one up so he could move his computer
upstairs without running a cable.  

I looked up 'wireless access point' and they are now about 54MBits/sec and
ours is 11MBits/sec.  More than adequate to get an 85Kbit/sec signal.  How
fast are most DSL lines?


#49 of 52 by nharmon on Fri Sep 29 19:47:51 2006:

1-5MBits/sec


#50 of 52 by keesan on Fri Sep 29 20:38:16 2006:

So the 11Mbps type should work fine for internet purposes.  The only  ones
I could find at ebay seemed to be cardbus (32-bit).  I have a cardbus 11MBit
model which may not work at all with my hardware.  I found a long list of
non-cardbus models which should work with linux but nobody was selling them.
Where could I look other than ebay?  Do any grexer have a really old pcmcia
wireless ethernet card they don't want?  The cardbus 11Mbps were asking $5
and no bids.

We should try the cardbus one with Win98 again, now that we fixed the BIOS
so the modem works.  (The com ports were messed up somehow).  Is it possible
to go online with Win98 and connect via cable to a linux computer, then use
linux online?


#51 of 52 by blaise on Fri Sep 29 20:45:53 2006:

You can get a Netgear MA401 on eBay for $23 (Buy It Now including
shipping).  That works well in a 16-bit PCMCIA slot.


#52 of 52 by keesan on Fri Sep 29 22:16:07 2006:

Thanks, online research suggests it is non-cardbus and works in linux with
module orinoco_cs.  Other people report having problems with it.  It is not
on the list of linux-compatible pcmcia devices (which is a bit out of date).

Should a cardbus card work with a 200MHz computer, circa 1997?  It appears
to have come with Win95 on it and was upgraded to Win98 and we have the CD
for Win98 for this card.  Cardbus was standardized in 1996.  It did not work
for us in Win98 but neither did the modem, and we fixed that in BIOS.


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: