Grex Oldcoop Conference

Item 308: Minutes of Board of Directors Meeting, January 16, 2006

Entered by slynne on Sat Jan 21 16:46:47 2006:

Grex Board of Directors Meeting
Monday, January 16, 2006

Board members in attendance:
Mark Conger (aruba), Lynne Fremont (slynne), Joe Gelinas (gelinas),
Bruce Howard (bhoward), Larry Kestenbaum (polygon).

Non Board members in attendance:
Steve Andre (steve), Marcus Watts (mdw)

Staff Report:
Steve said that he is going to return the memory in exchange for more
memory. He wants to put the new memory into grex

Steve said that he found a box at home with manuals and everything we
need for our new box. 

The problem with new motherboard is that it has a bad connector between
the p/s2 keyboard and motherboard. The PC has USB ports but they are
turned off in the BIOS so it currently cannot be booted into single user
mode. We can fix this by changing settings in BIOS. Mark says that there
is a USB port on the front that is turned on which we may be able to
plug a USB keyboard into. This presents a challenge for putting in the
memory. However, since this is the only problem with the motherboard,
Steve doesnt think we should change the motherboard unless we have
crashes after we swap out the memory. 

Bruce says Robocop has gone live and is packing real ammunition. It is
getting rid of unused processes which is good. Spammers have been
sending email from grex: Sometimes thousands per account per day.
Outbound mail restricted list has been implemented. Bruce has been
monitoring mail and has a script that monitors how much mail gets sent
so that we can monitor people who send more than a certain number of
outgoing messages. There is a restricted list and we need to decide what
to do about the list and how people get off of the list. There are a
number of options. Bruce would like to have a formal statement from the
Board about how we will do this. We can:
1.      Put people from certain sites onto the list automatically or put
all newusers on it. 2.      Require people on the list to enter a
capture(figlets) before sending mail 3.      Restrict the amount of mail
they can send 4.      Have accounts move off the list automatically
after 48 hours 5.      Limit the amount of mail any particular account
can send per day to 50 (Bruce recommends) 6.      Have two lists: the
kind of naughty list and the really bad spammer list and have different
restrictions

Re: Idle Daemon. Steve says we don t have a pty limitation so that isnt
a reason to keep the idle daemon. There is an ok.sh script that people
run that keeps people from idling. The people who seem to want not to
idle out seem to already be doing that. 

PC Weasel. Orphaned hardware. We cant buy one because the link is
broken.  Steve says everyone he has talked to who all say it is great.
As a company, they are not well structured. Steve says that the PC
Weasel people are good technical people but terrible business people.
Steve is going to send mail to get us this item. We need this because we
are a running a server on a PC machine. We are running on a PC because
an actual server would have cost a lot of money. 

Election of Officers
Mark - Treasurer
Larry - President
Lynne - Secretary. 

Vote = Sense of the board is that we will keep mail as open as possible
but give staff authority to limit or deny access  on an emergency basis
which will be reviewed at the next board meeting. All in favor

Next Meeting = Feb 23, Thursday. 3255 Cardinal. 7p

Another week for nominations
Vote = Election starts on 1/23 - all in favor. 

Discussion of sysadmin performance - Bruce is uncomfortable with a call
for review by a single member for a situation that isnt a pattern of
review. It might be impractical to have staff reviews every time a user
asks for one. 

Board when into executive session. 

Re Staff - As a board, we need to identify people who would be potential
good staff and actively identify them. 


Treasurer s Report

In November, we took in $219 and paid out $148. In December we took in
$263 and paid out $212

Mark renewed domain names and payed personal property tax. He notified
Ann Arbor that we have moved so they have removed us from their tax
rules. We might have to pay Ypsilanti Twp. We may not because there is
often a tax floor. Before the value of Grex s stuff was around $6000 but
now it is much less. 

We currently have 46 members which is less than we have had for a long
time. 

We stayed in the black because we cut expenses.

Meeting adjourned 
59 responses total.

#1 of 59 by cross on Sat Jan 21 17:45:24 2006:

So...Does that mean that the idle daemon is going away?  Or is it deemed
not necessary to turn it off since you can basically render it impotent?
If the latter, then how about removing the 10 hour ``max login time''
limit?

Regarding the PC weasel card: Grex is about ready for a hardware upgrade
anyway (jump to a new CPU/Motherboard/Ethernet controller; it wouldn't be
a bad idea to get a hardware RAID controller and some more disk at the
same time, and it's about time to switch to ECC RAM).  It occurs to me that
there are plenty of motherboards that support serial console operations
through the BIOS, ie, without something like a weasel card.  Tyan makes a
number of these.


#2 of 59 by keesan on Sat Jan 21 18:38:55 2006:

How long have we actually been using the latest new hardware?  I am happy with
its recent performance.  Was the board talking about the motherboard currently
in use having a bad keyboard port, or about the spare motherboard which had
been lost?  


#3 of 59 by slynne on Sat Jan 21 22:38:42 2006:

It is the current motherboard that has the bad keyboard port


#4 of 59 by spooked on Sat Jan 21 23:24:13 2006:

Yup, from my understanding - it's the interface between the keyboard connector
and the motherboard connection which is  aloof.


#5 of 59 by cross on Sun Jan 22 03:28:58 2006:

What motherboard?  The one grex is running on right now?


#6 of 59 by spooked on Sun Jan 22 04:31:06 2006:

Yes


#7 of 59 by cross on Sun Jan 22 07:20:59 2006:

If it's defective, why not replace it?  Wasn't a replacement motherboard
bought when the new grex was bought?


#8 of 59 by aruba on Sun Jan 22 10:22:18 2006:

Re #7: Yes, the spare motherboard was in the box STeve found in his house.


#9 of 59 by keesan on Sun Jan 22 15:40:07 2006:

I would not mind grex being down for one day next weekend if anyone wanted
to replace the motherboard (or get it working with USB keyboard instead).


#10 of 59 by glenda on Sun Jan 22 20:38:08 2006:

The problem with the motherboard does not directly affect Grex being up and
running.  While I agree that it needs to be taken care of, it ain't happening
next weekend if STeve has to be involved.  My birthday is next Friday and I
get first priority over Grex with STeve's time and attention for a change.


#11 of 59 by spooked on Sun Jan 22 22:12:26 2006:

Gooo Glenda :)


#12 of 59 by bhoward on Tue Jan 24 01:04:29 2006:

I'd just as soon see the system pass the milestone of having been
up for a month before bouncing it.

But maybe I'm being sentimental.


#13 of 59 by naftee on Tue Jan 24 05:12:03 2006:

or unlucky


#14 of 59 by cross on Thu Jan 26 02:51:38 2006:

So what's up with the idle daemon?


#15 of 59 by slynne on Thu Jan 26 14:20:56 2006:

resp:14 I dont believe that anything was decided about it. 


#16 of 59 by cross on Fri Jan 27 00:31:03 2006:

It seems that Steve said he thought it wasn't necessary.  Anyone else
care to weigh in?


#17 of 59 by tod on Fri Jan 27 01:11:49 2006:

I'll break the scale but thanks


#18 of 59 by cross on Fri Jan 27 05:34:51 2006:

(Report to remedial PT at 1100.)


#19 of 59 by tod on Fri Jan 27 17:21:39 2006:

This recruit has his red striped gray sweater on, sir!


#20 of 59 by naftee on Fri Jan 27 23:32:11 2006:

tod's wearing brake shoes


#21 of 59 by tod on Sat Jan 28 01:27:58 2006:

Pork Chop Platoon!


#22 of 59 by cross on Sat Jan 28 03:55:44 2006:

When I was in MOS school in the stumps, we had this one kid who was a real fat
body.  He got put on weight control and remedial PT, but every time we had a
five or ten minute break, he'd rush out to the vending machines in the
breezeway and down a snickers or some other equally unhealthy and fattening
thing.  One time I said to him, ``look, you know that you're a fatbody, you
know you're on weight control, and yet *every* time I see you you're digging
your grape into some fucking candy or another.  What the hell?''  He looked at
me, looked at the snicker's he was eating, and said, ``see this here candy
bar?  This is my ticket out of the United States Marine Corps with an
honorable discharge.''  He eventually rocked out and got sent to the grunts.
They don't play that shit, so I assume he got shaped up pretty fast.  He used
to also fall asleep in class.  One of our instructors was a retired Master
Guns who had done 30 years in the Corps.  One day he sees fatbody nod off and
shouts, ``Thomas!  Wake the fuck up!''  The kid wakes up, and without thinking
about it says, ``Aye, Corporal!''  The retired Master Guns says, ``I'm not a
fucking Corporal.''  ``Aye, Master Sergeant!'' ``I'm not a goddamned Master
Sergeant, neither!''  I almost lost my bearing at that one.


#23 of 59 by mcnally on Sat Jan 28 04:18:07 2006:

I guess you had to be there.


#24 of 59 by nharmon on Mon Jan 30 02:31:43 2006:

MOS school...so he graduated boot camp like that?


#25 of 59 by naftee on Mon Jan 30 03:32:10 2006:

in the stumps ?
digging your grape ?

whoa. 


#26 of 59 by tod on Mon Jan 30 05:35:54 2006:

re #24
Its possible he took a month off after boot camp and blew back up like a
Macy's balloon. I knew this guy who did it by eating Domino's pizza 3 or 4
times a day.


#27 of 59 by mary on Mon Jan 30 11:31:49 2006:

Way to get out of a bad deal.  Brilliant.  Bring on the chocolate!

Might have saved his life.


#28 of 59 by tsty on Mon Jan 30 15:17:52 2006:

thankxx but i'll risk being skinny instead - better odds.


#29 of 59 by tod on Mon Jan 30 18:19:40 2006:

Cheaper too


#30 of 59 by cross on Tue Jan 31 00:40:03 2006:

Regarding #27; Not exactly.  First of all, that kind of discharge is
other than honorable (goose-fat was mistaken that it was an honorable).
Second, he didn't get kicked out, he got kicked to the grunts.  Last
I heard, he was manning a .50 cal on top of an LAV in Iraq.  As far as
I know, none of his peers from the school he flunked out of have been
deployed (though at least one guy volunteered).  So, neither brilliant,
nor a way to get out of a bad deal.  Just a way to make it worse on
himself.


#31 of 59 by mary on Tue Jan 31 02:34:39 2006:

He needed to get fatter.


#32 of 59 by scholar on Tue Jan 31 02:38:25 2006:

i'm too fat for my own good, but i walked for an hour or so today, and i'm
sure that burned several hundred calories!


#33 of 59 by nharmon on Tue Jan 31 03:45:00 2006:

Hey Dan, can't you be brought up on charges for doing things that render
you unfit for duty? Like, say, shooting yourself in the foot. What would
it have taken for this guy to see punishment like that?


#34 of 59 by cross on Tue Jan 31 16:21:33 2006:

Regarding #31; No, he just needed to have not enlisted.  It's not like
anyone forced him, nor like he got drafted.

Regarding #33; Yes, that can happen.  I've seen people get disciplined for
having really bad sunburns.  The old joke used to be that they'd get slapped
with "Destruction of Government Property" charges (them being the property).
However, you've got to be a real idiot for that.  I suspect that, had it
actually gotten to the point where they were going to kick him out, he would
have gotten slapped with some kind of charge.  There are people who just
legitimately can't lose the weight, because they've got some kind of glandular
thing or something like that.  Those people they won't OTH or screw with their
lives.  This kid wasn't one of them.


#35 of 59 by tod on Tue Jan 31 18:44:43 2006:

Actually, the destruction of government property was a valid charge at one
time.  Here's my bright shining example: 
You would become exempt from certain NSA/TS clearances if you had any
distinguishing features on your person such as visible tattoos.  The Corps
might train someone for 18 months only to have them lose their required
clearance for that MOS by doing something stupid like tattooing their forearm.
The Old Man up at the White Elephant would burn your ass for wasting his
budget on you.  That went same for things like criminal charges which would
ruin your clearance.  They'd find a way to make you pay for it like bust you
down, take your pay, and throw you into something like the 30 second life
expectancy type MOS's where you walk around with a big f'in antenna sticking
up to make you an easy target.  Worse, they might make you part of the
masturbation patrol (MP) battalion where you'd be sentenced to saluting
officer's vehicles at the gate all day.


#36 of 59 by nharmon on Tue Jan 31 18:50:03 2006:

What does a tattoo have to do with being trusted with top secrets?


#37 of 59 by tod on Tue Jan 31 18:53:53 2006:

re #36
Ask Aldrich Ames's victims.


#38 of 59 by nharmon on Tue Jan 31 18:56:55 2006:

Woah! I studied that guy when I did a research report on polygraph for
one of my criminology classes. I don't remember anything about tattoos.


#39 of 59 by tod on Tue Jan 31 19:32:43 2006:

I was referring more to the grandiosity, selfish act, and impulsiveness of
tattoos.  Those are red flags with a polygraph or background check.  The fact
they didn't kick Ames to the curb for his drunken and boisterous personality
was even more suspect.  He was a squiggly lil nerd who basically handed over
the whole Soviet list of assets thinking he could con the KGB except they
picked up on those traits I mentioned and got him to "brag".
You don't want forearm tattoo guys handling your sensitive data.  That's the
weird thing about the Sean Connery James Bond is his forearm tattoo but then
again he was always about counter insurgency (assassinations) rather than data
collection.
Am I biased? Yea, dude.  And you with the keys on your pants, you're just as
bad.


#40 of 59 by cross on Tue Jan 31 21:11:58 2006:

Regarding #36; Tattoos are also distinguishing marks, that make it easier
to be identified.  ``Well, he was medium build, medium height, had brown
hair and grey eyes, and oh yeah, had a tattoo of Iwo Jima on his left
forearm!!''  Kinda makes it hard to be incognito.


#41 of 59 by tod on Tue Jan 31 21:49:40 2006:

Yea, they like you to only have the same shoes when you swap your disguises.
  8D


#42 of 59 by naftee on Wed Feb 1 02:41:57 2006:

whoa.

we should have a marine corps conference, FWed up by tod and cross.


#43 of 59 by other on Wed Feb 1 02:55:52 2006:

...keys on your pants...?


#44 of 59 by tod on Wed Feb 1 05:12:53 2006:

Keys hanging off your pants = Cliff Clavin


#45 of 59 by richard on Wed Feb 1 16:35:24 2006:

re #0 what good does it do to place people on a "restricted email" list when
all they'll do is run newuser and get a new unrestricted login?


#46 of 59 by kingjon on Wed Feb 1 23:23:02 2006:

Re #45: From the text of #0, it's clear that the list is a whitelist (you have
to do something to be able to send email), not a blacklist (a list of users who
can't).



#47 of 59 by richard on Thu Feb 2 15:20:15 2006:

Here's one idea.  Restrict email for the first thirty days of a login's life.
Grex can make it so all new logins must be thirty days old before email access
is activated.  This might prevent grex from being used as an email address
mill.


#48 of 59 by janc on Thu Feb 16 18:16:55 2006:

I notice that the next board meeting is scheduled for Thursday February
23 at 7pm.

That isn't actually a very good date for me.  I could do it, but I'd
have to arrange a baby sitter.  For the next month or two, I won't be
free on Tuesday or Thursday nights until about 9pm.

Would it be possible to reschedule it?


#49 of 59 by keesan on Thu Feb 16 18:19:05 2006:

Are your kids old enough to sit quietly through a meeting?


#50 of 59 by janc on Sun Feb 19 16:30:44 2006:

My kids bedtimes take place during the meeting, which is why I can phone
in either.  Bedtime takes a lot of parent interaction.


#51 of 59 by janc on Sun Feb 19 16:31:21 2006:

Er, that should have been "CAN'T phone in".


#52 of 59 by naftee on Sun Feb 19 18:37:01 2006:

you could get your kids to phone in as part of their bedtime routine


#53 of 59 by polygon on Wed Feb 22 14:08:04 2006:

We're rescheduling the meeting.


#54 of 59 by janc on Thu Feb 23 00:10:33 2006:

It looks like Monday might work, but we haven't heard back from everyone
yet.


#55 of 59 by naftee on Thu Feb 23 02:48:49 2006:

i'm free


#56 of 59 by polygon on Thu Feb 23 06:22:34 2006:

With no objection to Sunday, February 26, I have scheduled the meeting
for that evening, and I'm now posting the agenda.


#57 of 59 by polygon on Thu Feb 23 06:24:09 2006:

I have posted the agenda as item 316.


#58 of 59 by slynne on Thu Feb 23 14:21:53 2006:

Sunday is better for me too :)


#59 of 59 by jesuit on Wed May 17 02:16:03 2006:

TROGG IS DAVID BLAINE


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: