Grex Oldcoop Conference

Item 292: Dan Cross is a hero

Entered by scholar on Thu Nov 10 01:19:35 2005:

I'd like this item to be used for us all to express our appreciation of Dan
Cross and his contributions to Grex.

While he hasn't contributed shit compared to what some of the old foagies
have, he's one of Grex's newest (and perhaps, at least recently, most active)
staff members.  I'm not at all original and am indeed rather bland when I note
that helping to admin a system is a job where you hear all sorts of complaints
when shit happens, but don't hear many thanks for even acknowledgements when
things go right.  Despite those limitations, the sentiment is TRUE, and Dan
ought to have what he's contributed acknowledged.

I know I'm not exactly a respected member of the Grex community, and that I
deserve the position of DISPRESECT I'm relegated to, and, indeed, that I seem
rather ANTAGONISTIC to the Grex community and indeed even Dan Cross
personally.  However, I truly appreciate Dan Cross's contribution to Grex,
a system I enjoy as much as anybody, and I hope my own desiccated status on
Grex doesn't interfere with the purpose of this item:  to acknowledge and
support Dan Cross's efforts to improve and enhance Grex.
42 responses total.

#1 of 42 by cross on Thu Nov 10 01:20:51 2005:

Thanks, scholar!  :-)


#2 of 42 by bhoward on Thu Nov 10 03:51:32 2005:

I never thought I would live to see the day :-)


#3 of 42 by naftee on Thu Nov 10 04:27:56 2005:

cross :-)


#4 of 42 by cross on Thu Nov 10 04:31:15 2005:

I'm Rick James, bitch.


#5 of 42 by naftee on Thu Nov 10 06:19:12 2005:

Is Wayne Brady gonna hafta choke a bitch ??


#6 of 42 by spooked on Fri Nov 11 13:51:16 2005:

Shit - he can actually string together a few humane and 
grammatically-sound structures together...



#7 of 42 by scholar on Fri Nov 11 21:48:53 2005:

I'm not sure if anyone else on Grex has paid enough attention to certain
actions of spooked to realise he's awfully creepy, but the fact stands:  he's
awfully creepy!


#8 of 42 by naftee on Sat Nov 12 05:08:15 2005:

r 292
ql

i'm spooked :(


#9 of 42 by janc on Mon Nov 28 15:04:10 2005:

I'm sorry to see Dan leave staff.  His contributions have been very
real.  Not only did he do a lot in porting various code to OpenBSD
(notably the login stuff), but his participation in technical
discussions during the period when we were moving Grex to OpenBSD
was very helpful to me in the work I did.  His tolerance for
aggravation and frustration weren't quite up to what is routinely
demanded from Grex staff, but I consider that more of a problem
with Grex than a problem with Dan.  In any sane organization, I'd
be happy to have Dan on my team.


#10 of 42 by tod on Mon Nov 28 17:09:50 2005:

Who's in charge here?  -Captain Willard
Aren'tt you?  -Soldier at Do Long Bridge


#11 of 42 by keesan on Mon Nov 28 20:32:41 2005:

I hope that Dan was only expressing his emotions and is not really going away.
I get a bit annoyed at some people here sometimes too.


#12 of 42 by cross on Tue Nov 29 01:43:31 2005:

Welp, I was removed from all staff related aliases, groups, etc, and got my
access to the staff conference yanked, so, I'm pretty much gone as staff.


#13 of 42 by keesan on Tue Nov 29 03:18:44 2005:

Would you consider coming back as staff if asked politely?  


#14 of 42 by tsty on Tue Nov 29 03:59:55 2005:

as of what date, cross, were you offed?
  
btw, for the 'offense' of keeping grex down - rather than destroyed - and
also being somewhat of a staff-pest, i was summarily 'offed' after
confiding some then-current stresses to staff member(s)` who, it seems,
betrayed me. that sort of leadership was the absolute *last* of all 
my hopes for grex-as-friends/family.
  
it has never been a matter of 'if', it has only been a matter of 'when'
and 'who' that grex would blow up.
  
for over a decade *my* focus has been to provide services to RECOVER
from both 'when' and 'who'. 
  
damn shame it was STeve - too bad my services have been ignored since
LOOOONG before 'when.' denying the inevitability of 'when' is borg/staff
arrogance, or something similar.
  
dumping on STeve is non=-productive in the extreme. stop it.
  
dumping on borg for stucture failures IS productive - keep it up!
  


#15 of 42 by scholar on Tue Nov 29 04:52:38 2005:

Re. 12:  Don't call keesan a welp!


#16 of 42 by tod on Tue Nov 29 10:41:56 2005:

re #14
I thought the complaint was popcorn related?


#17 of 42 by mary on Tue Nov 29 13:58:39 2005:

Re: 12  Dan, you are off staff because you asked to be off staff.
You sent mail to baff resigning and gave a good reason for doing so.

But I suspect your resignation (the second time you've resigned) was again 
out of anger, because I'd criticized you for being critical of STeve, 
especially when you stated his reputation was "overblown".

I have no problem with you disagreeing with me.  It's a shame you go off 
like a bomb when I disagree with you.  I'm glad the rest of staff doesn't 
likewise blow when you lob criticism at them.

You may have thought about it some and reconsidered your resignation.  It 
looks like some folks think you would be a good fit.  If so, let staff 
know, they'll discuss it and ask the board to okay it, and you'll again 
have your access.

My personal opinion (and you don't have to read this if you think it will 
bother you too much) is that you are talented and knowledgeable but way to 
volatile to be on Grex's staff.  We've done talented and knowledgable and 
volatile before and it almost killed the system.

But others might and obviously do feel differently.  So there you go.


#18 of 42 by tod on Tue Nov 29 16:45:30 2005:

Taking Grex down without notifying users and then destroying their mail isn't
"volatile"?  Grex staff has always been volatile so long as Grex has gone down
days on end without updates to the users.  I think the Grex Board needs to
work on its diplomacy skills and try to keep staff around.  Insulting the
existing staff members and then calling them volatile borders on mentally
abusive.  Why would anyone put up with that?


#19 of 42 by keesan on Tue Nov 29 17:22:24 2005:

Mary, I have also found some of your remarks (probably based on unfounded
assumptions) upsetting, though I did not mention it at the time.  Perhaps you
could wait until the next day and reconsider some of your statements before
posting them, if they might offend someone here.  And Dan, perhaps you could
do the same before reacting to postings that you find upsetting.  In person,
they might not come across the same way.  Mary is a good person, but can rub
people the wrong way despite her good intentions.  You could both write out
your responses and put them aside to mull over until morning.  Sometimes
people post things that they would not dream of saying in person, maybe
because the other person seems like an abstract concept not an individual.


#20 of 42 by jadecat on Tue Nov 29 17:26:36 2005:

re #18- there was a note in the MOTD about Grex going down for an OS
upgrade... at least I remember seeing it there beforehand.


#21 of 42 by tod on Tue Nov 29 18:01:10 2005:

re #20
I log on Grex pretty regularly..several times a day.  I would be surprised
if that MOTD was more than a few hours in advance.


#22 of 42 by mary on Tue Nov 29 18:03:59 2005:

Be surprised, be very surprised.


#23 of 42 by tod on Tue Nov 29 18:12:31 2005:

re #22
I would also ask that the General Announcements item also include the
notification about expected downtimes.  Often as a SSH user or someone with
a fast connection, you don't always catch the MOTD.  Who on the Board is going
to take that torch aand hold staff to it?


#24 of 42 by steve on Tue Nov 29 18:28:34 2005:

   Sorry  but that can't always be done.  Its *good* to give notice about
when the system will be going down, and I'll always try for that.  But
given the realities of access to Grex now, and personal schedules, the
oppurtunity to do something physical is sometimes going to be on short
notice.

   This is a simple reality of moving the system to a place where we
don't have continued access.


#25 of 42 by tod on Tue Nov 29 18:38:25 2005:

I appreciate your limits, STeve.  I hope the Board can find volunteers that
are more flexible.


#26 of 42 by steve on Tue Nov 29 18:54:41 2005:

   We've always had this problem before Tod.  This is nothing new.
Actually, I think things are worse for most techies now; 5 years
ago I think we had more random available staff time.  Now, everyone
seems more pressed for time.


#27 of 42 by nharmon on Tue Nov 29 18:55:48 2005:

I would like to add that announcements can and should be made even when
its probable the system will be worked on. For example, if you think you
might be taking Grex down tommorow during the day but that depends on
whether something happens in your non-Grex life (smile), say so. For
example:

| Grex may be down tommorow from 12pm to 4pm for a system upgrade if I 
| can make it to the colo. If it isn't down by 12:30, assume it will not 
| be down at all. -staff

And while I know its near impossible to know how long things like
upgrades will take, an ending time would give the users an idea of
whether things are going okay or not..."Well, its 4:30pm and grex isn't
up, something must have happened and it'll probably be down for a while
longer".  As for calculating this time, you could use the formula I use
for estimating project times:

best case + (4 x likely time) + worst case
------------------------------------------
                  6

A little communication can go a long way, and a MOTD change a few hours
before an upgrade is better than nothing.


#28 of 42 by steve on Tue Nov 29 19:28:43 2005:

   I think we've usually given some notice, haven't we?

   The part that we need to work on I think, is putting better
status notices on the hvcn status of grex page.


#29 of 42 by naftee on Tue Nov 29 22:01:24 2005:

I think both tsty and dan cross should have their staff priviledges given back
to them.


#30 of 42 by keesan on Wed Nov 30 01:23:50 2005:

Would it be adequate to post a notice in the first five items of agora, once
a day for five days before grex were going down for a rebuild?


#31 of 42 by steve on Wed Nov 30 01:42:59 2005:

  A rebuild isn't going to happen that often.  Worry more about abrupt
changes in the hardware such that we need to fix things *soon*. If its
reasonable to be able to predict when the system will be going down,
I'm all for announcements.


#32 of 42 by nharmon on Wed Nov 30 04:01:00 2005:

Thats all we ask, Steve. Thanks!


#33 of 42 by naftee on Wed Nov 30 05:06:40 2005:

thanks, steVE


#34 of 42 by nharmon on Wed Nov 30 13:22:16 2005:

 > Would it be adequate to post a notice in the first five items of agora, 
 > once a day for five days before grex were going down for a rebuild?

This coming from the same person who told all of us to grow up back in
the HUMOR item?

Maybe you should take a little bit of your own advice Sindi.


#35 of 42 by remmers on Wed Nov 30 14:02:44 2005:

To clarify #12:  Dan's removal from the staff aliases were at his own
request.  I was also in the process of setting up an account for him on
Grex's CVS server when he indicated to me that he was no longer
interested and that I shouldn't bother.


#36 of 42 by tsty on Thu Dec 1 06:10:28 2005:

grex has never has problems *finding* volunteers ... just keeping them.


#37 of 42 by cross on Sat Dec 3 00:33:41 2005:

To clarify, yes, I did ask to be off of staff, and I don't recall ever
saying I didn't, though people seem to have interpreted response #12 as
indicating as much.

Regarding #17; No, Mary, I have not reconsidered and I don't want back
on grex staff.  Or rather, I have considered and my decision stands.  I
don't care if you criticized me for criticizing Steve, though I think
you can hardly call yourself objective.

Sindi, no, I'm not likely to come back to grex staff if asked politely.
Grex just isn't the kind of community I feel like supporting with my
time and effort.  Sorry!

To all those who felt I did good work on the system.  I appreciate your
kind comments.


#38 of 42 by naftee on Sat Dec 3 04:37:26 2005:

cross :)

GreX :(


#39 of 42 by tsty on Wed Dec 14 17:03:32 2005:

thankxx, cross, for all the work *AND* commentary you have contributed
to the system-grex. 
  
keeping volunteers has always been a problem. they eventually
get 'run-on-down-the-road' ..... except the inner circle, of course.
  
...oh .... wait ... there is no inner circle ...oops, sorry! 


#40 of 42 by naftee on Wed Dec 14 23:21:09 2005:

 )-:-(


#41 of 42 by tsty on Tue Feb 21 18:48:52 2006:

maybe this item is interferring iwth the next item, eh?


#42 of 42 by jesuit on Wed May 17 02:15:59 2006:

TROGG IS DAVID BLAINE


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: