I posted a copy in some other item, but recently Steve' ANdre sent an E-mail to Gmail stating something to the effect that I had used their service to impersonate Grex's staff. This has since been shown to be false. The impersonator was, in fact, hayz3141. Of course, some people confuse hayz3141 with me. However, even Eric Bassey, my staunchest persecutor, agrees that there is REASONABLE DOUBT and NO SOLID EVIDENCE that we are the same person. The E-mail Steve' sent, on the other hand, was worded in such a way that anyone would think Steve' KNEW or at least THOUGHT he knew we were one. To-day, my account has been killed. This, it seems to me, is an absolute abuse of staff's powers. Steve' lied about me and, because of this, I lost something that was quite useful and IMPORTANT to me. He ought to apologize.35 responses total.
This response has been erased.
(on a more personal note: i've been having a terrible time lately. as has been discussed in other items, i have various mental ISSUES, and have been having a TOUGH TIME getting any enjoyment out of life recently. indeed, i've been mostly absolutely miserable and have had trouble even being COMFORTABLE in my own skin as it were. my gmail account had imporant e-mails in it, including ones from PEOPLE I LOVE AND WHO MAKE ME A BIT LESS MISERABLE, and these are now probably irrecoverable. to lose this in my present state, especially for absolutely no reason at all, SUCKS.)
pity, really.
A sad, tall tale.
David - I'm sorry you are having a tough time. I suggest going to the psychological counseling service at your university. I'm afraid you long ago used up any well of sympathy on Grex.
Actually, from #5 it doesn't sound like he has. Though of course it's possible that you're the only one who can muster any.
Re. 5: I've already done that, thanks, but let's concentrate on the issue at hand, to wit, staff abusing its position of responsibility (and therefore assumed respectability) to slander users it dislikes.
Yeah ! Response #5 is a kind of a neat paradox !
Steve is indeed sorry - he is sorry he has to spend time dealing with system twerps.
All I have to say on the subject is that it is about time some people learned the using the Internet to be a sociopath does not shield you from the consequences of your sociopathy.
Yet more libels from yet more of my persecutors. I will respond to them individually, though it's questionable what the efficacy of such treatment will be when one considers the highly organized and collective nature of these villains/kerls. Re. 9: Calling me a twerp is what philosophers know as a Red Herring Fallacy. What could me being a twerp possibly have to do with Steve' slandering me in an attempt to make it impossible for me to maintain my already limited social network? (As Steve' well knew when he sent the E-mail, the freezing of my account now means I have irrecoverably lost several very important E-mail addresses and E-mails. This is an attempt on Steve''s part to drive me insane by removing my methods of social contact. Keep in mind I have virtually no social contact with people in person, due to various mental diseases, and that killign my E-mail account has removed one of my limited sources of support/camaraderie/companionship as well as EVIDENCE of SCC. It's basically an attempt to destroy my identity). Re. 10: Yet another name, yet another read response 9. (One wonders how someone having a mental disorder (sociopathy, which has a very specific definition that I don't fit whatsoever) could possibly be an excuse to lose all precepts of justice. We know other reads lots of legal texts (we've seen him quote from there before) and so we know he knows this is absolute bunk in terms of any legal theory that has ever in the history of mankind been promulgated, but this is just another indication that he's not serious in attributing his persecution of me to this particular reason.
I'm using the word sociopathy in a descriptive and hyperbolic manner. Yours is a behavioral or disciplinary disorder, and as such, suffering the consequences of your actions is the best treatment.
My account was closed because (beconsequence) I impersonated Grex's staff. Since I didn't do that, how could suffering the loss of my account (and my social support structure) possibly be a consequence of my actions? Are you suggesting there can be effects without causes? And, at that, effects that can be attributed causally to certain people DESPITE TEHR EBEING NO CAUSES?! This is whaqt Ckant was talking about when he said THJE METAPHYSICS OF MORALS, and you trying to sneak around metaphysical boundaries doesn't help your case (i.e. , that you'rre trying to hide the fact that you're boasting about trying to destroy my social structures.).
Consquences of what? STeve falsely advised Google.
Prove it. Basic behavioral patterns, numerous posts from a number of accounts and possibly other evidence to which STeve may have had easier access than I make for a very reasonable conclusion that those accounts are held by the same person, and that is the person whose gmail account was referenced. In light of the past behavior of the user claiming to have been wronged, he has used up any obligation of good faith owed him by staff, and if he was wronged, then he should provide the reasonable proof of it. Short of that, I am content to ignore his noise and hold any claims he makes in utter contempt.
it should be noticed that if we're to have any SOLID< INTERNALIZED standard of conduct, we have to go beyond a simple "actions->consequence" based "morality". implicit in this idea is that you ought to do something based simply on HOW IT BENEFITS OR HARMS YOUR PERSONAL INTERNALIZATION OF BENEFITS/COSTS TO SELf. it doesn't say you OUGHT to do this, or this is more ARTISTIC to do, or that you've AGREED to do this, but DO THIS BECAUSE YOU WON"T BE HARMED AND DO THIS BECAUSE YOU WILL GET BENEFIT. This results in COWARDICE (hiding things, doing thme just when you think you can get away with it, etc.) and loses any indication of how one OUGHT TO slash the BEST MOST SATISTFYING WAY. basically, trher'e's nothing solid here.
Re. 15: people ought not be punished on SUSPICION alone. also, i can't help but think your suggestion that i "prove it" is made with knowledge that the suggestion is absurd. how exactly am i supposed to prove it? that would certainly requre hayz's cooperation, and an effect of me NOT BEING HIM is that i don't have easy access to that cooperation.
Noise, noise, noise. Grex is a community, and as such it is organic, not static. When people work as hard as you have to break the system, they can have no reasonable expectation that the system will not respond in kind, no matter how highly principled its design and general intent. You've tried to bend us over and ravage us every which way since you first showed up here. Have a taste of your own stuff, and enjoy it, with my compliments. (Doesn't feel as good to be the one under the gun, does it?)
You've tried to bend us over and ravage us every which way since you first showed up here. Have a taste of your own stuff, and enjoy it, with my compliments. You pervert.
Actually, I think he's probably thoroughly enjoying himself right now.
Someone's squealing like a pig. I'm just not sure who . . . .
OTHER ! CAN I ENJOY IT WITH YOUR CONDOM_IMENTS ?
Look how other changes his position (quicker than Kerry, I might add). First he started off by, uh, RADICAL SKEPTICISM: I BELIEVE< HE SAID< THAT IT CANNNOT BE SHOWN THAT HAYZ AND SCHOLAR ARE DIFFERENT AND TEHREFORE THEY MUST BE TREATED AS THE SAME> ESPECIALLY CONSIDERING HOW SCHOLAR HAS LIED INSIMILAR INSTANCES IN THE PAST (WHICH *ISN"T* TRUE> If you look at it, the only time I've DENIED being the cause of a problem I caused on Grex is when I was trying to implicate jp2, but that's because it WOULDN"T HAVE WORKED if I had fessed up (though I did anyway, as soon as I found out it wouldn't work (*but for other erasons)))
NOW, other's claiming that he thinks it's okay BECAUSE I've been unjust to Grex and so I ought to be unjust doned to. This is a TOITALLY different position than what he had before, though of courzse both have the same awful result.
TOTAlly
I see that polytwerp has sunk back to "forget-before-reading" levels.
I suspect that if people just ignored polytarp, he'd eventually get bored and go away. Sure, he might try and do something massively annoying to get attention, and it would be quite irritating, but if it were ignored for long enough, he'd move on to greener pastures.
like your mother, lol.
lolz
> Calling me a twerp Hmmm, did someone actually call you a twerp? Maybe it's just your paranoia...
Stop removing my means of social contract!
As in "contracting a social disease"?
as in his ability to abuse otehr people.
and uyour abli.,ltiy to type.,
TROGG IS DAVID BLAINE
You have several choices: