Grex Oldcoop Conference

Item 193: Cyberspace Communications finances for August 2004

Entered by aruba on Tue Sep 7 21:50:39 2004:

Here is the treasurer's report on Cyberspace Communications, Inc. finances 
through August 31st, 2004.

Beginning Balance     $3,580.31

Credits                 $150.00         Member contributions
                          $2.00         Payment for a Grex Handbook
                          $1.41         Interest on our savings account
                   ------------
                        $153.41

Debits                   $84.43         Pumpkin Rent for September
                         $61.02         Electricity for August
                         $91.54         Phone Bill
                        $135.00         DSL August 15 through September 15
                          $3.99         Paypal fees (income = $92)
                   ------------
                        $375.98

Ending Balance        $3,357.74

Our current balance breaks down as follows:

$3,101.20               General Fund
  $173.99               Silly Hat Fund
   $60.00               Spare Parts Fund
   $22.55               Infrastructure Fund

The money is distributed like this:

  $475.30   Checking account
$2,882.44   Savings account earning 0.55% interest annually

We had no new members in August.  We are currently at 73 members, 65 
of whom are paid through at least September 15th.  (The others expired 
recently and are in a grace period.)

Notes:

- I was away for most of August.  Thanks to gelinas for paying the 
bills.

- I moved $500 from the savings account to the checking account.

Thanks to everyone who contributed in August:

bookie, mooncat, n8rxs, witling, and one person who didn't give his 
login.

If you or your institution would like to become a member of Grex, it 
only costs $6/month or $60/year.  Send money to:

Cyberspace Communications
P. O. Box 4432
Ann Arbor, MI 48106-4432

If you pay by cash or money order, please include a photocopy of some 
form of ID.  I can't add you to the rolls without ID.  (If you pay 
with a personal check that has your name pre-printed on it, we 
consider that a good enough ID.)  Type !support or see 
http://www.cyberspace.org/member.html for more info.
80 responses total.

#1 of 80 by albaugh on Wed Sep 8 20:13:52 2004:

The erosion would seem to be continuing...


#2 of 80 by aruba on Thu Sep 9 01:59:30 2004:

Yes, we're not doing well, financially.  Becuse I was out of town for most
of August, I didn't send a lot of reminders I would have sent otherwise,
which accounts for some of the loss of income.  That should carry over to
September.  But even so, the membership numbers are lower than they've been
since 1994.


#3 of 80 by tod on Thu Sep 9 15:42:10 2004:

The sporadic downtimes probably haven't helped much, either.


#4 of 80 by cyklone on Thu Sep 9 21:32:00 2004:

The "Personal favors for favored persons" vote didn't help any, either. 
Why the hell would a non-favored person donate to fund someone else's
personal playpen?




#5 of 80 by albaugh on Fri Sep 10 16:21:16 2004:

cyklone, blow yourself out, and give it a rest, already.


#6 of 80 by tod on Fri Sep 10 16:50:49 2004:

re #4
Even though there are some hobbyhorse hogs, I don't subscribe to the idea that
Grex is solely their property.  The vandalism of Jan Wolter's girlfriend was
unfortunate but I try not to let that rain on the idea that Grex is worth
saving from decay both administratively and hardware wise.


#7 of 80 by albaugh on Fri Sep 10 16:59:05 2004:

The problem may be that something, though worthy, which is not accessible on
a reliable basis might not survive.


#8 of 80 by tod on Fri Sep 10 17:17:58 2004:

Maybe Cyberspace Inc should consider going colo in order to keep the
membership from being shut out and turned away.


#9 of 80 by aruba on Fri Sep 10 17:28:51 2004:

I think that most of the board and staff are willing to consider colo at
this point, if we can find a good enough deal.  The last time we looked into
it, it was going to cost more than what we pay now, which is hard to
swallow.


#10 of 80 by tod on Fri Sep 10 17:39:55 2004:

What about colo on the host's hardware?


#11 of 80 by slynne on Fri Sep 10 17:58:30 2004:

Is that more expensive?


#12 of 80 by cross on Fri Sep 10 18:20:31 2004:

Regarding #9; Well, wait a sec; colo space providing vastly more than
grex needs was going to cost a lot more.  I suspect that colo supporting
just what we need to be significantly less expensive.


#13 of 80 by mooncat on Fri Sep 10 18:36:40 2004:

re #12- that would be wonderful- if we can find it.


#14 of 80 by mary on Fri Sep 10 20:07:55 2004:

Or we could move the community to an forum-hosting entity, drop the 
hardware, drop our software, drop insurance and rental space and 
have no need for volunteer staff other than those fairwitnessing the 
conferences.  Of course we'd also be dropping dial-in capability and 
access to unix utilites and disk space.

Ultimately, I see this in Grex's future.


#15 of 80 by tod on Fri Sep 10 20:24:23 2004:

M-Net is colo
What's Grex's excuse?


#16 of 80 by mfp on Fri Sep 10 20:38:23 2004:

Re. 14:  Why are you a pessimist?


#17 of 80 by mary on Fri Sep 10 20:52:04 2004:

I'm not a pessimist.  Grex was configured the way it was when it 
first opened in 1991 because that's what we needed to be and could 
pull off.  Lots of changes since then.  It's not doom and gloom to 
recognize that and be willing to adjust to changing times, needs and 
available support.

I'm actually quite positive about the community and feel we'll 
survive even if the context changes.


#18 of 80 by tod on Fri Sep 10 22:23:21 2004:

re #17
Ditto


#19 of 80 by cyklone on Sat Sep 11 00:44:11 2004:

Re #5: Is that the best answer you can come up with? What a weak mind you
must have. Your mother must be quite proud.


#20 of 80 by krj on Sun Sep 12 15:19:43 2004:

I would have to disagree with Mary on the idea of turning Grex into 
just another web forum, with no unix access.   My observation from 
party is that the few new people we're getting came here originally
looking for a "free Unix shell."  A tiny percentage of those 
people are interested in community and communication, and that's where
the new users who stick around are coming from.  


#21 of 80 by mfp on Sun Sep 12 16:38:50 2004:

I know I wouldn't be here if Grex had been a web forum when I arrived.


#22 of 80 by mary on Sun Sep 12 17:37:51 2004:

This response has been erased.



#23 of 80 by mary on Sun Sep 12 17:51:00 2004:

Re: #20  They can come here *thrilled* to find unix access but if 
they aren't skilled in unix system administration and willing to 
volunteer and chunk of time, well, we still have a problem.

Chipping in with support would also be nice.

 


#24 of 80 by mfp on Sun Sep 12 21:06:50 2004:

(I have repeatedly offered to chip in!)


#25 of 80 by slynne on Sun Sep 12 21:27:20 2004:

It is an interesting issue to be sure. The hard truth is that if we 
find we dont have the resources to continue as we are, we have to do 
something else. It is true that some of those options arent as nice as 
what we have now. But they are cheaper and would require much less 
staffing. We might find we have no choice but to go that route. And we 
might find that the change isnt as bad as predicted. 


#26 of 80 by tod on Sun Sep 12 21:38:45 2004:

mdw and STeve aren't around anymore to fix the box and popcorn lost her mind
altogether..seems like alternatives should be entertained for logical reasons


#27 of 80 by twenex on Mon Sep 13 02:47:38 2004:

What happened to mdw and STeve, exactly? Lose interest?


#28 of 80 by mary on Mon Sep 13 10:37:22 2004:

What happened is other obligations, either family or health or
jobs, or all of it.  STeve is still around.  But you know what,
it's okay to lose interest too.  Just because you give generously
of your time for a long time doesn't mean you are obligated to do
so forever.  That's always been true and it's wrong to hold a sense
of entitlement over how our volunteers spend their time.


#29 of 80 by tod on Mon Sep 13 14:01:07 2004:

re #28
I agree and think that is why flexibility needs to be examined in Grex's
existence in order to survive.


#30 of 80 by twenex on Mon Sep 13 14:11:40 2004:

Did I say anything in #27 that required a defence a la #28?


#31 of 80 by remmers on Mon Sep 13 19:41:32 2004:

I think Mary was responding more to #26.


#32 of 80 by albaugh on Mon Sep 13 19:58:53 2004:

I guess when I think about it I have assumed that the people who have stuck
around grex have been those who are attracted by what grex is.  I'm willing
to be proven wrong, that it's "the community" that keeps them here, regardless
of the underlying technology.  But I believe, at least for myself, if grex
just become some conference SIG somewhere on some system, part of a "corporate
takeover/buy-out", that it will cease being grex, and will therefore cease
being something I'm interested in continuing participation with.

I am also admitting openly that if reliable access to grex remains dubious,
I will discontinue or greatly curtail participation.


#33 of 80 by tod on Mon Sep 13 20:53:16 2004:

I wouldn't be around if Grex went corporate.  I'd stick around if the
machinery were changed around a bit to support reliable connectivity though...
There would still have to be a "party" and "bbs" though and it would have to
not suck (i.e. no GUI lameness)


#34 of 80 by naftee on Mon Sep 13 21:11:19 2004:

I'd give money if and only if GreX removed the ID rule


#35 of 80 by other on Mon Sep 13 21:21:41 2004:

I think the confusion here is because the sense of what Grex is 
includes more than the design of the community, but the fact that it  
is an entirely self-contained and self-controlled entity, 
financially and technologically.  By that I refer to its occupying 
its own space in the physical and Internet worlds both.  The power 
that the communty has to shape Grex is limited only by imagination, 
law, and the dynamics of Grex's democratic style governance.

A big part of its history is resident in the experiences of members 
of the community who dealt directly with the physical and codebase 
components of Grex.  The makeup of the community has shifted largely 
away from those who literally created it, and like with most things, 
those community participants whose behavior makes it clear that they 
least value the community that Grex WAS are those who came later and  
inherited Grex without contributing personal time and effort in 
either its construction or governance.

What has typically been characterized in an us-them dichotomy as 
Grexers versus M-Netters is really a dichotomy between "Old Grex"ers 
and "New Grex"ers, or between those who built Grex, and took up care 
and management of Grex to nurture it into adulthood and those who 
moved in like a college frat into a beautiful old house and trashed 
what was there (or created something new -- depending on your 
viewpoint) simply because they could -- or didn't know any better...


#36 of 80 by tod on Mon Sep 13 21:24:28 2004:

The "Old Grex"ers are more like a frat, dipshit.  I've been on Grex since its
inception and it was always plagued with xenophobic redtape.  The ID rule
being one of those fine examples.


#37 of 80 by cmcgee on Tue Sep 14 01:03:32 2004:

And I'm a newcomer who felt like there was *no* us versus them mentality, and
dthat it was not that hard to be welcomed into the community.


#38 of 80 by mooncat on Tue Sep 14 02:14:57 2004:

Okay, I keep seeing this complaint about connectivity and reliability. 
Can anyone tell me the last time Grex was down for any length of time 
OTHER than the last couple weeks? We had two things happen closely 
together- this doesn't make for a trend. 

Tod, how is the ID rule xenophobic?


#39 of 80 by ryan on Tue Sep 14 03:17:22 2004:

This response has been erased.



#40 of 80 by mfp on Tue Sep 14 05:17:17 2004:

Yeah.  I'll probably give money now, but only 'cause now I've got a credit
card or two waiting for me at some bank or something somehwere and can send
money without hassle, even though I still don't like having to give my ID,
even though I've freely given out my name and address and probably even phone
number numerous times.

BAsically:  fuck you.


#41 of 80 by tod on Tue Sep 14 15:28:52 2004:

re #38
Grex was down a bunch in May, wasn't it?  

I find it a bit hypocritical that free speech is touted and even a blurb about
the ACLU actions are on the website, yet staff has deleted items and ID is
required for membership on an "open" system.  Yes, its xenophobic.  Anyone
that has observed the fiasco with popcorn's actions being condoned by Grex
would see how xenophobic it is.  Common arguments "She is a friend of mine"
rather than "what is good for governance of actions on an open system".
Why is membership tied to "ill will"?


#42 of 80 by twenex on Tue Sep 14 16:14:39 2004:

It's not xenophobia, it's identity-theftophobia. And like murderophobia,
that's a good thing.

To be honest, I'm not sure where you get the idea that it has anything to do
with hatred of foreigners.


#43 of 80 by tod on Tue Sep 14 17:43:32 2004:

Locals are favored when the decision making processes ensue. Haven't you
noticed that by the board minutes?


#44 of 80 by twenex on Tue Sep 14 19:41:17 2004:

I find minutes boring; I don't read them. Apart from anything else, it's
usually bleeding obvious which among us are the foreigners and which are
the all-American baseball players with perfect teeth, so why should an
ID requirement make any diff whatsoever?


#45 of 80 by mooncat on Tue Sep 14 21:14:51 2004:

re #41- you do realize that as 'company' Grex has to be responsible, on 
some level, for it's members? 


#46 of 80 by tod on Tue Sep 14 22:59:20 2004:

re #45
Are you referring to the system being down so Members couldn't access it? ;)


#47 of 80 by cyklone on Wed Sep 15 01:18:03 2004:

I haven't noticed M-net's no ID needed policy causing any problems.


#48 of 80 by mooncat on Wed Sep 15 12:30:34 2004:

re 47- so you're saying that it never will cause problems?


#49 of 80 by tod on Wed Sep 15 15:38:46 2004:

re #48
We have a staff that keeps an eye on the system over at M-NET so problems
usually don't last long.


#50 of 80 by mooncat on Wed Sep 15 18:36:37 2004:

re #49- Oh really? So M-net doesn't ever have periods of downtime?


#51 of 80 by tod on Wed Sep 15 19:51:41 2004:

Putting words in my mouth doesn't hide your defensiveness about the ID rule
for membership on Grex.  My comments state that our attentive staff on M-Net
is sufficient enough to not warrant ID checks or background checks or invasion
of privacy in order for someone to be a paying member of Arbornet.


#52 of 80 by tod on Wed Sep 15 19:53:59 2004:

re #50
Are you saying that Grex's downtime is solved by knowing the private
information of the Grex membership?  Is a member of Cyberspace tinkering with
the outdated DSL modem at the pumpkin and you're somehow able to summon the
secret Grex cops to stop such mischief?


#53 of 80 by aruba on Wed Sep 15 22:07:22 2004:

Grex is not doing any background checks or ID checks on anyone.  (Though we
have received fraudulent ID on at least one occasion, and rejected it.)

Tod - If you don't like any of Grex's rules, the thing to do is make a
motion to change the rule.  Then we vote on it, and if enough people agree
with you, the rule will be changed.


#54 of 80 by mooncat on Thu Sep 16 13:12:10 2004:

re #52- I'm saying the ID rule and downtime are not at all related. 


#55 of 80 by naftee on Thu Sep 16 19:43:11 2004:

re 52 Very funny.  I don't like the rule, but I can't vote on it.  I'm sure
you know why not.  AND don't say it's because I don't want to give money to
GreX.


#56 of 80 by tod on Thu Sep 16 19:50:57 2004:

re #53
Mark, the thing to do before making a motion is to create a stir in order to
muster enough interest in changing anything.  Grex historically does not
attract interest in change.  I'm also engaging in a discovery process with
this.  I'm not at all convinced the ID requirement holds much weight as a
safety net for Grex.


#57 of 80 by remmers on Thu Sep 16 20:24:36 2004:

"Grex historically does not attract interest in change."

I engaged in a discovery process and discovered that over the years,
12 of 19 member proposals passed.  (Including one that enabled Todd
and other non-local members to run for the Board.) That's an average
of almost one per year.  

http://cyberspace.org/local/grex/votes.html


#58 of 80 by tod on Thu Sep 16 22:11:01 2004:

re #57
Were it not for mynxcat's incessant whining prior to the motion, I doubt it
would have gone anywhere.


#59 of 80 by aruba on Fri Sep 17 20:40:58 2004:

I believe I was the one who proposed that motion, and I don't remember
whining at all.

Tod - give us some examples of systems that allow people to telnet through
them, anonymously.  I know you mentioned M-Net and the Armenian Freenet. 
What others are there?


#60 of 80 by tod on Fri Sep 17 23:01:09 2004:

King County Library System.
I wish I could come up with more but I stopped bouncing pseudos about 10 years
ago and have noticed most forums going the way of web browser.


#61 of 80 by mfp on Sat Sep 18 02:36:37 2004:

There're also guest.sailor.lib.md.edu and rootshell.be, and plenty of places
to telnet anonymously if you look around you.  
LIKE< WHETHER IT"S WIRELESS OR WHATEVER OR ON SOME UNIVERSITY OR WHATEVER OR
SOMETHING< YOU KNOW?!   JUST THAT NO_ONE"S GOING TO HVEA MUCH OF A PROBLEM
TELNETTING ANONYMOUSLY.


#62 of 80 by naftee on Mon Sep 20 04:34:00 2004:

Long live sailor.


#63 of 80 by aruba on Tue Sep 21 22:55:33 2004:

I get "Unknown host guest.sailor.lib.md.edu" when I try to ping it.  md.edu
is apparently the University of Muldova.  Speaking for myself, I don't want
to take sites in Armenia and Muldova as examples of how Grex should behave,
any more than I'd emulate them in anything else.  They exist in a different
legal and social climate than we do.

rootshell.be is in Belgium, which strikes me as a little closer to home, but
still not all the way there.  Is the King County library system in Seattle,
Tod?  Do you have an URL?

I'd like to point out that allowing anonymous telnet from Grex means
allowing mfp & company to telnet through Grex, thus making us the target of
anger from those downstream when vandalism is comitted.


#64 of 80 by mfp on Tue Sep 21 23:30:26 2004:

Oh.  Sorry.

It's guest.sailor.lib.md.us.  I was just in an edu sort of mood.


#65 of 80 by aruba on Wed Sep 22 14:10:16 2004:

rootshell.be does indeed let me ssh out as soon as I log into my account for
the first time.  However, they require an alternate email address to which
they sent my username and password, so they have somewhere else they can
point a finger if I do something bad.  It's not much security, but it's more
than Grex would have if we allowed (essentiallly) anonymous telnet.


#66 of 80 by keesan on Wed Sep 22 20:24:58 2004:

Moldova is probably the correct spelling unless they changed recently.
Once it was Moldavia.


#67 of 80 by tod on Wed Sep 22 20:43:55 2004:

Aren't they 2 different things?


#68 of 80 by twenex on Wed Sep 22 20:46:10 2004:

Nope.

(Unless pre- and post-Communist Mold-place are).


#69 of 80 by tod on Wed Sep 22 21:52:56 2004:

Romanians don't say "Moldavia"


#70 of 80 by albaugh on Thu Sep 23 14:43:18 2004:

What was the country in "The Mouse That Roared"?  ;-)


#71 of 80 by marcvh on Thu Sep 23 17:15:20 2004:

The Dutchy of Grand Fenwick.


#72 of 80 by albaugh on Thu Sep 23 18:05:27 2004:

That's pretty close to mole-davey-eh.


#73 of 80 by naftee on Fri Sep 24 06:17:02 2004:

Long live polish sailor.


#74 of 80 by aruba on Fri Sep 24 14:21:47 2004:

When I telnet to guest.sailor.lib.md.us I get a menu shell, which doesn't
(obviously) have a telnet option.  It has Lynx, but Lynx is configured not
to accept telnet:// URLs.  How do you telnet out?


#75 of 80 by mfp on Fri Sep 24 17:41:12 2004:

You go find a telnet:// and follow it.  Grex has such a link on its website,
but I think they may have blocked Sailor or something.


#76 of 80 by naftee on Sat Sep 25 05:18:08 2004:

Yeah, try the m-net link.


#77 of 80 by mfp on Sat Sep 25 05:21:37 2004:

M-Net hasn't banned Sailor?!  Whoa!


#78 of 80 by naftee on Sun Sep 26 05:47:08 2004:

Whoa!


#79 of 80 by janc on Thu Sep 30 04:09:20 2004:

I haven't been reading this for a while, so I have some comments heaped up.

I don't think moving to a web-only interface would be a good thing.  I'd
expect to lose about half our users.

I do think we should look for a non-commerical colo kind of arrangement
- something similar in spirit to what HVCN has.

I think I am getting close to getting nextGrex up.  I wish more people
were working on it.  I don't really wish I had more time to work on it.
 I'm afraid I hate this kind of work.  Porting software.  Dead boring. 
I'd rather develop new software.

I have very little faith in claims like "if you would only make such and
such change in policy, then I'd start sending money in."

I think there is a lot that could be done to make Grex better.  What's
usually lacking is people willing to do work.  Plenty of people willing
to talk about what other people should do.


#80 of 80 by jesuit on Wed May 17 02:15:15 2006:

TROGG IS DAVID BLAINE


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: