Grex Oldcoop Conference

Item 179: Grex Board of Director's Meeting Minutes - May 21, 2004

Entered by slynne on Mon May 24 18:29:37 2004:

Board members present: Mark Conger, Lynne Fremont, Joe Gelinas, Bruce 
Howard, Mary Remmers. 
Others present: Steve Andre, Glenda Andre, Kip DeGraaf

1.      Opening Gavel Tap

2.      Treasurers Report: 
April and May were bad. $313 taken in and $372 spent so we are down 
around $60. There were no new members in April. We received official 
notification that our 501 c 3 is current and active. We are currently 
at 80 members with 67 paid up. 

3.      Staff Report:
 Kip has been doing some visable things such as locking certain users 
accounts and deleting posts for copyright violations. 

User jp2 has asked for a board discussion about copyright issues. Board 
and Staff discussed this. The Board has appointed staff and will 
continue to leave issues like this up to the staff. The Board will 
continue to trust Staff s judgement. 

DSL Modem   The new modem donated by tod has not been installed. The 
modem will be replaced this weekend. There has been no lag since 
Wednesday. The issue may not be the modem at all but might be the 
wiring in the building. 

Discussion of moving Grex to the Ann Arbor Public Library since the 
library is getting a new high speed connection. Kip works for the 
library so he ll look into this informally. Our insurance is due in 
August but if we pay for a whole year and don t use it, we can get a 
refund, there is no real time limit for making a decision about a move. 
Other co-location options were discussed. 

Next Grex is still on hold. It just needs people to get working on it. 
The staff have been feeling discouraged by atmosphere on Grex. 

Staff will explore the option of going with Fronttalk on Grex rather 
than Picospan since Fronttalk is already installed on Next Grex. They 
also need quotas on newuser. Steve has a work around. Staff to have a 
partial staff meeting immediately following board meeting. 

4.      Next Meeting   Monday, 6/28 at Mary Remmers s house. 

5.      New Business -  Post office box keys. We have 2 but we might be 
able to get three. Mark is going to look into it. 

6.      Closing Gavel Tap.
45 responses total.

#1 of 45 by keesan on Mon May 24 19:46:16 2004:

Is Fronttalk graphical?  


#2 of 45 by slynne on Mon May 24 20:29:43 2004:

From my understanding it looks pretty much like picospan


#3 of 45 by gelinas on Mon May 24 21:17:16 2004:

"Fronttalk is a experimental command line interface to Backtalk.
I'm announcing it here in the garage conference because it's really just
a hackers toy - very flakey and incomplete now, might not ever turn into
anything real" (janc, in Item 130 of the "garage" conference, Tue, Dec
4, 2001).


#4 of 45 by mary on Mon May 24 21:42:25 2004:

I believe Jan has done some work on it since that last comment
because when I asked him about it, maybe a month ago, he said
it was loading a little slowly but otherwise shouldn't be much
slower that Pico.  He also said that if BackTalk was running on
top of FrontTalk, that he'd be able to do some creative things
with BackTalk.

Anyhow, it's on Grex and anyone can try it out.  At whatever 
Unix prompt you have simply enter ft.  It's a little sluggish
loading but then seems quite perky.

I think he said it was already on Next Grex.


#5 of 45 by aruba on Mon May 24 21:47:31 2004:

I gather Jan's done a good bit of work on it since that message.  You can
run it on CurrentGrex by typing "ft".

We currently have 2 keys to the post office box.  One is on my keyring,
the other is at janc's house.  I asked at the post office, and they don't
have a third key, and can't make copies.  So they will re-key the lock
in order that we might get a third key.

The first two keys are free - each one after that costs $4.50.  So I paid
them $4.50, and will exchange my key and Jan's for 3 new ones when the box
has been re-keyed.  No charge for re-keying.

Thanks for taking notes, Lynne!


#6 of 45 by aruba on Mon May 24 21:48:16 2004:

(Mary slipped in.)


#7 of 45 by albaugh on Mon May 24 22:06:58 2004:

> The staff have been feeling discouraged by atmosphere on Grex.

Can anyone explain just what that has to do with Next Grex?


#8 of 45 by keesan on Mon May 24 22:34:48 2004:

I just tried ft.  26 sec to get into bbs, where it looks just like picospan.
Typing bbs gets me the bbs in 2 seconds.  If I type n in bbs it lists all the
conferences where there are no responses almost immediately.  With ft it is
about 2 sec between conference listings.  I am dialed in directly.  I would
use this as an emergency approach but not out of choice.  I hope Marcus can
find the time to compile picospam for next grex, soon.  


#9 of 45 by aruba on Mon May 24 22:38:41 2004:

Re #7: Kevin - when the staff feels discouraged about Grex, they are less
likely to take the time to work on it.  Since they are all volunteers, that
is their perogative.  Your name was mentioned, BTW, as being particularly
supportive and helpful.

So we should all act more like albaugh. :)


#10 of 45 by gelinas on Tue May 25 00:54:30 2004:

I included the date in the citation specifically to show that the comment was
three years old.  I included the conference and item citation so that people
can check the item and see the record of progress for themselves.


#11 of 45 by richard on Tue May 25 03:26:46 2004:

re item #3 in minutes...Kip has been locking certian users accounts and
deleting posts for copyright violations?  What is the point in locking user
accounts when they can run newuser and just get another one?  As long as
newuser is open, what is the point of locking accounts? seems like a waste
of time

Also, whether something is a "copyright violation" constitutes a legal
opinion.  You can't just say something is a "copyright violation", you have
to have a legal basis for it.  If Kip or any other staff member is deciding
what is a copyright violation, and what isn't a copyright violation, they are
opening a potential hornet's nest of dissenting opinions.  I think its best
to leave it alone.  Don't remove posts for copyright violation unless there's
a court order saying to do so.  


#12 of 45 by other on Tue May 25 03:44:27 2004:

Better yet, ignore richard.


#13 of 45 by mary on Tue May 25 12:04:11 2004:

Copyright vs fair-use issues are a muddy area.  We could hire specialized
attorneys and still get conflicting advice, I suspect.  But Grex isn't in
the position to do anything but use our best judgement, be open to user's
advice on how it should be handled, and hope our staff doesn't burnout
while doing the very best they can. 



#14 of 45 by twenex on Tue May 25 12:29:26 2004:

Re: #13: "We could hire specialized
 attorneys and still get conflicting advice[.]"

Doesn't one hire attorneys *in order* to get conflicting advice?

8D


#15 of 45 by slynne on Tue May 25 15:06:19 2004:

I completely agree with resp:13. 



#16 of 45 by keesan on Tue May 25 16:06:03 2004:

It does take a few minutes to run newuser, which might discourage vandals if
they have to keep opening new accounts to be annoying.


#17 of 45 by albaugh on Tue May 25 18:30:05 2004:

Re: #7/#9:  I knew the answer before I asked.  :-)  Obviously I understand
that humans can get discouraged, especially when they feel unappreciated.
I was wondering if by "atmosphere" it was meant "there are ingrates over-
criticizing staff" etc. or that there was so much time cleaning up after
vandals there was no time to do the interesting stuff, i.e. Next Grex?
If it's the former, then all I can say is "try to ignore them and do what ya
gotta do" - at least some of us aren't worried about / make an issue of
administrivia re: punks...


#18 of 45 by aruba on Tue May 25 20:13:56 2004:

Re #11: Richard - you're right that we shouldn't be making a determination
as to what's a "copyright violation" and what's not.  But we should still
have our own policies/reactions when something is clearly in violation, as
was the case with realugly's post of russ's poem.


#19 of 45 by cmcgee on Wed May 26 00:57:26 2004:

With the request from the author to remove it, not a determination of
copyright violation in a vacuum.


#20 of 45 by richard on Wed May 26 03:05:08 2004:

query...can newuser be modified so it locks out people that are running it
from specific ip addresses?  that might at least discourage users whose logins
have been taken away from creating new ones, because they'd have to re-route
the way they connect to grex (changing their ip) before running newuser


#21 of 45 by remmers on Wed May 26 14:18:56 2004:

That's an approach to consider, but it has the downside that other users
might want to connect from the same ip.


#22 of 45 by remmers on Wed May 26 14:29:55 2004:

Re #8:  I suspect that speed differences between Picospan and Fronttalk
will be far less noticeable on NextGrex than on CurrentGrex.


#23 of 45 by tod on Wed May 26 18:00:17 2004:

re #20
Why are you chasing the rain?  Why not just change your perspective?


#24 of 45 by twenex on Wed May 26 19:14:23 2004:

Chasing the rain is a nice expression.


#25 of 45 by cyklone on Wed May 26 21:14:35 2004:

"With the request from the author to remove it . . . "

Oh yeah, the Jep Solution. It worked so well in the past!


#26 of 45 by glenda on Wed May 26 22:16:25 2004:

Not the jep solution.  This was a copyrighted work, copied in total, and
claimed to be the work of the person posting it.  The actual author complained
about it and asked that it be removed.  Totally different situation.  Even
you should be able to see that.


#27 of 45 by cyklone on Wed May 26 23:05:59 2004:

Perhaps I was too subtle for you. When you  adopt a system whereby a person
can simply assert "I am the copyright owner, you must remove that" without
independent investigation, then you are essentially giving power to anyone
bold enough to make that claim, regardless of whether or not they in fact have
a valid copyright. Even a pinhead should be able to see that.


#28 of 45 by twenex on Wed May 26 23:16:10 2004:

Whilst cyklone's diatribe is rather aggressive, I would agree with a more
measured version thereof.


#29 of 45 by glenda on Wed May 26 23:17:42 2004:

We did do independant investigation before removing it.  The incident and what
was done about it and why were discussed in the item where the posting
occurred.  Before screaming about improper actions by staff go look at it.
It is item 110 in Agora.


#30 of 45 by jp2 on Wed May 26 23:27:40 2004:

This response has been erased.



#31 of 45 by glenda on Wed May 26 23:30:14 2004:

Your work was fully cited as to author and where it came from.  No one claimed
it to be their's and not yours.


#32 of 45 by jp2 on Wed May 26 23:37:08 2004:

This response has been erased.



#33 of 45 by glenda on Thu May 27 00:06:50 2004:

Wrong, you are not a second class user.  I is felt that what you are
complaining about falls under fair use.  From the DMCA: "`(c) OTHER RIGHTS,
ETC., NOT AFFECTED- (1) Nothing in this section shall affect rights, remedies,
limitations, or defenses to copyright infringement, including fair use, under
this title."


#34 of 45 by other on Thu May 27 01:54:29 2004:

Jamie, unless you can prove beyond the shadow of a doubt that the 
use you decry was not fair use, I respectfully request that you 
cease demanding that the barn doors be locked when the horse was 
never even there to escape.


#35 of 45 by jp2 on Thu May 27 01:56:18 2004:

This response has been erased.



#36 of 45 by jp2 on Thu May 27 01:57:56 2004:

This response has been erased.



#37 of 45 by cyklone on Thu May 27 03:59:33 2004:

Re #29: Before screaming about improper actions you may want to reread what
I wrote, which was about general *principles* (a word many grexers seem
unfamiliar with) and not the specific situation involving Russ.


#38 of 45 by krj on Thu May 27 16:48:06 2004:

Ho hum.


#39 of 45 by albaugh on Thu May 27 20:47:52 2004:

Re: #27 - cyklone, don't *you* be a pinhead.  Any statement that asserts or
implies that grex staff will not or is incapable of exercising proper and
measured action instantly loses all weight.


#40 of 45 by cyklone on Thu May 27 22:34:59 2004:

I guess I don't follow your logic. The Valerie/Jep incident clearly showed
that at least some staff were incapable of exercising proper and measured
action. That being the case, I think only a pinhead would NOT be concerned
about that happening in the future. Of course one way to provide
assurances the lesson has been learned would be to restore the deleted
posts not owned by Valerie or Jep.



#41 of 45 by jp2 on Fri May 28 00:52:52 2004:

This response has been erased.



#42 of 45 by albaugh on Fri May 28 19:09:57 2004:

Bay away if you feel you must.  Any notion that passing resolutions is really
going to protect you from rogue staff on grex is delusion...


#43 of 45 by soup on Mon May 31 02:25:38 2004:

So we sit around and wait for the bombs to fall; and when they destroy the
village, we don't rebuild it. 
Sounds like a plan!


#44 of 45 by albaugh on Tue Jun 1 16:09:15 2004:

If you are huddled like a wimp waiting for the bombs to fall on grex,
you need a different place to hunker down.  See ya...


#45 of 45 by jesuit on Wed May 17 02:15:09 2006:

TROGG IS DAVID BLAINE


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: