Grex Oldcoop Conference

Item 177: Member Resolution

Entered by jp2 on Mon May 17 16:31:04 2004:

From my understanding, this requires a certain number of endorsements within
a certain period of time.  I am not sure about the details as the Bylaws on
the website have not been updated yet.  Regardless, here is my proposed
resolution.

                                An Act

To restore items killed during the first week of 2004.

  Be it enacted by the Members of Cyberspace Communications,

Section 1.  Restoration of Killed Items.

  (a)  (1)  The items previously numbered 81, 106, 142, 145, 117, and 113
            of the femme conference and items previously numbered 87, 102,
            105, 108, 110, and 112 of the smalls conference shall be
            restored from back up tape and returned to their previous
            places within the conferencing system. 
       (2)  All posts within items referred to in this subsection authored
            by the users known as "popcorn" or "valerie" shall be scribbled
            prior to restoration.

  (b)  (1)  The member resolution passed on February XX, 2004 is hereby
            repealed.
       (2)  The item previously numbered 63 in the agora40 conference and
            the item previously numbered 11 in the agora41 conference
            shall be restored from back up tape and returned to their
            previous places within the conferencing system. 
       (3)  All posts within items referred to in this subsection authored
            by the users known as "jep," "popcorn," or "valerie" shall be
            scribbled prior to restoration.

Section 2.  Allowances for Linked Items.

  Where applicable, items linked across multiple conferences shall be
  relinked as nearly as possible in their original configuration.

Section 3.  Implementation.

  The Board of Directors shall appoint a staff member responsible for the
  restoration of the items listed in Section 1 of this act.  The
  designated staff member shall, prior to restoration, publish a list of
  authors responding to each item.  Each author may then request to have
  their responses to any items listed scribbled prior to restoration. 
  Such requests must be made publicly, such as in an item in the coop
  conference, and within ten days of the publication of the author's list.
25 responses total.
#1 of 25 by realugly on Mon May 17 19:43:50 2004:

I support this; I am a member in good standing.

#2 of 25 by realugly on Mon May 17 19:58:56 2004:

ENDORSE< that is. n ot support so much.

#3 of 25 by soup on Mon May 17 20:48:56 2004:

As a MIGS, I both support and endorse this Act, be it enacted by the members
of GreX.

#4 of 25 by tod on Mon May 17 23:06:45 2004:

I vote yes

#5 of 25 by albaugh on Tue May 18 03:55:16 2004:

I do not / will not endorse this rehash.

#6 of 25 by tod on Tue May 18 05:37:53 2004:

C'mon. You know you want to. ;)

#7 of 25 by jp2 on Tue May 18 13:27:03 2004:

This response has been erased.


#8 of 25 by mary on Tue May 18 20:03:58 2004:

Say please.

#9 of 25 by realugly on Tue May 18 20:40:36 2004:

Don't be a cunt.

#10 of 25 by remmers on Thu May 20 16:00:45 2004:

(Been away for a few days.)

The online copy of the bylaws is now up-to-date.
http://cyberspace.org/local/grex/bylaws.html

Article 5 is the relevant one here.  Short version: In order to be voted
on, 10% of the membership must endorse bringing the proposal to a vote by
so stating in this item, and must do so within 30 days of the original
posting.

I'm not sure exactly how many members we have at the moment, but I think
10% translates to 8 or 9.

#11 of 25 by jp2 on Fri May 21 02:46:52 2004:

This response has been erased.


#12 of 25 by aruba on Fri May 21 03:01:11 2004:

To see how many eligible voters there are, type
  !members -v -c
At the moment, there are 76 eligible voters.  So the motion needs 8
endorsements to be brought to a vote.

#13 of 25 by richard on Fri May 21 03:17:10 2004:

its time to let this thing die jp2.  its over.  its done with.  this bullshit
is killing grex.  let it go.

#14 of 25 by soup on Fri May 21 13:50:36 2004:

The j key keeps sticking on this keyboard.

#15 of 25 by jp2 on Sun May 23 05:06:09 2004:

This response has been erased.


#16 of 25 by cyklone on Sun May 23 14:39:19 2004:

Yup. Leave jep's and valerie's words deleted, along with those of anyone
else who wishes not have them restored. Restore the rest. It's quite
simple, and to do otherwise makes a mockery of grex.

#17 of 25 by happyboy on Mon May 24 22:16:05 2004:

and a mockery of the RIBBON, Maaaaaan.

#18 of 25 by dpc on Thu May 27 19:58:47 2004:

I endorse this proposal.

#19 of 25 by jp2 on Fri May 28 00:51:00 2004:

This response has been erased.


#20 of 25 by realugly on Fri May 28 01:45:25 2004:

You're welcome!

#21 of 25 by soup on Mon May 31 02:18:34 2004:

Thanks, jp2!

#22 of 25 by gregb on Thu Jun 10 18:08:27 2004:

Would it be possible for someone to make a proposal to not raise this
specific issue ever again?

#23 of 25 by salad on Fri Jun 11 04:14:51 2004:

If the GreX staff decided to get rid of that stupid ID rule I would consider
it.  But of course that will never happen.

#24 of 25 by salad on Fri Jun 11 04:17:52 2004:

On both counts.

#25 of 25 by jesuit on Wed May 17 02:15:08 2006:

TROGG IS DAVID BLAINE

There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: