Grex Oldcoop Conference

Item 146: A question for the board

Entered by jp2 on Fri Mar 12 11:16:37 2004:

Why hasn't the Board filed criminal charges for unathorized entry and
destruction of the corporation's property against valerie?
12 responses total.
#1 of 12 by slynne on Fri Mar 12 15:52:55 2004:

I dont feel that it is necessary. That is why I havent brought it up 
anyways. I believe in consequences that are in line with a person's 
actions. I dont think that the "property" that was destroyed had much 
value. Or at least not enough to file criminal charges.

#2 of 12 by other on Fri Mar 12 16:08:56 2004:

If property can be considered a resource, jp2 is far more liable 
for destruction of Grex resources than is valerie.  If any action 
be taken against valerie, it had better be taken against jp2 first.
(And polytarp etc. before either of them.)

#3 of 12 by jp2 on Fri Mar 12 19:36:49 2004:

This response has been erased.


#4 of 12 by tod on Fri Mar 12 20:37:13 2004:

This response has been erased.


#5 of 12 by salad on Sat Mar 13 01:23:33 2004:

re 3 Seeing as you filled up GreX's partitions may times (cf rational's item) I
think the board has lots of grounds for any charges.

#6 of 12 by rational on Sat Mar 13 01:43:32 2004:

I agree with saladman (a good jewish name) 's legal analysis of the situation
at hand and at foot.

#7 of 12 by salad on Sat Mar 13 01:48:02 2004:

Indeed, rational, as his name suggests, is thinking rationally when he warns us
of irrational behaviour.

#8 of 12 by jp2 on Sat Mar 13 01:53:25 2004:

This response has been erased.


#9 of 12 by rational on Sat Mar 13 01:54:06 2004:

jp2 is a Paki terrorist hacker.

#10 of 12 by salad on Sat Mar 13 01:55:42 2004:

re 8 Are you sure you didn't fill up any partitions when you sent your 900 or
so e-mails, hmm?

#11 of 12 by jp2 on Sat Mar 13 04:41:03 2004:

This response has been erased.


#12 of 12 by jesuit on Wed May 17 02:14:57 2006:

TROGG IS DAVID BLAINE

There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: