Grex Music3 Conference

Item 19: The vinyl-to-CD at home item

Entered by scott on Thu Aug 23 01:55:46 2001:

Lately I've transferred a few vinyl albums to CD, using my PC and of course
some software.  This all got hashed over in the last music conference (I
should link the item, come to think of it.  It's still mostly relevant!)

Anyway, in the last couple of months I've had conversions with a couple of
people from the "vinyl era" (I'm from the tail end) who are just now realizing
that they could burn their precious/rare vinyl to CD using a commodity PC,
if only they knew how.  I sense a big trend coming here.  
17 responses total.

#1 of 17 by krj on Thu Aug 23 02:12:59 2001:

((Um, I already linked that as item:7 in music3, so you 
  should retire item:20 which is a duplicate link.))


#2 of 17 by tpryan on Thu Aug 23 02:37:16 2001:

        There it is, across the living room.  The new PC totally 
capable of turning vinyl/tapes or audio sources into CDs.  I 
don't see where I do it, though.


#3 of 17 by dbratman on Thu Aug 23 16:49:33 2001:

Would I do it, even if I had the equipment right across the living 
room?  Probably not, or not very much of it.  The fact is, for as long 
as I've owned LPs I've had the much simpler & easier to use technology 
to turn them into reasonably durable and highly portable cassette 
tapes, and I've never done much of that either.


#4 of 17 by cmcgee on Sat Aug 25 14:13:50 2001:

I didn't want to turn my LPs into tape because of the linear
inaccessability.  With CDs I can play one tune over and over again, just
like I used to, or skip tracks I don't like, just like I used to.  Tape
technology wasn't as easy.

So now I'm ready to turn my LPs into CDs.  Many of them I've already
found at Borders, but quite a few are limited editions made by favorite
folk bands that never were distributed much beyond  concert sales
directly to me.  

So direct me to the PC!


#5 of 17 by dbratman on Mon Aug 27 20:31:22 2001:

Tape wasn't that much less easy, and I'm not one to play one track over 
and over like that.  What tapes and CDs can do, but LPs can't, is get 
played in a car and on a Walkman.  That's a significant enough shared 
plus over LPs, and tapes are not _that_ much harder to use, that if I'd 
do the CD-burning route I'd have done the tape-dubbing one.


#6 of 17 by scott on Mon Aug 27 23:41:49 2001:

Somebody used to make a "portable" turntable, which basically looked like a
big plastic clamp over part of the record.  Can't really imagine taking my
LPs to the beach, though.  ;)

What CDs can do that tapes can't is be copied again and again without
generation loss.  Also, in the case of out-of-print LPs it's a nice way to
archive the stuff for future generations.


#7 of 17 by scott on Mon Aug 27 23:50:55 2001:

Perhaps somebody who's done recording under Windows could post what software
they like?  I've been using Linux; my recorder is yarec, my subsonic filter
is done in ecasound, and I use snd for editing.

I've heard of people using Cool Edit Pro for recording and liking it.


#8 of 17 by dbratman on Wed Aug 29 23:54:48 2001:

Scott 6: For the purpose at hand, which is copying an LP on something 
you can play portably, CDs lack of generation loss isn't that 
significant.  Unless you're concerned about sound quality, and a 
generation of people who listen to MP3s certainly aren't.

Alas, CDs are not an archival medium.  In a few decades, your CDs will 
decay and become unplayable.  As for storing the data in a computer 
file, the history of storing computer files gives very little hope 
that "future generations" will be able to make any use of it.  By far 
the best archival medium for storing sound developed to date is an LP 
in a vault at a cool temperature.


#9 of 17 by scott on Thu Aug 30 00:07:31 2001:

Yeah, but who cares if CD-Rs go bad?  If I can do a clean copy every 5-10
years then I don't really have to worry about losing the data.  Especially
if I'm not the only one preserving a copy of that album.  :)

Also, doing CDs has basically become easier than doing tapes (doesn't help
that both of my cassette decks are dying...), especially when it comes to more
than one copy.


#10 of 17 by krj on Thu Aug 30 06:33:17 2001:

I need to digress here and ask about going (digitally) from minidisc
to CD.  Leslie has 8 minidiscs of concert performances from her 
summer music program in the Czech Republic, and she's offered to 
distribute copies to some of her colleagues.   So the first step is 
to get the minidisc tracks into the PC.  We are assuming that our 
laptop soundcard is such that we don't want to go through an analog
stage, but would prefer somehow to go digital out from the minidisc
and then convert the files on the PC to the CD format.


#11 of 17 by scott on Thu Aug 30 11:37:48 2001:

Hmmm... well, I've done a few MD to CD transfers, all through the analog audio
input of a sound card.  Still really good sound.  I think the standard is some
kind of optical digital signal which the higher-end Soundblaster cards have,
but you'd have to buy a deck MD player to get the same output.


#12 of 17 by tpryan on Fri Aug 31 21:58:19 2001:

        My portable MD does not have optical out.  It does have optical 
in, and can handle digital dub from DAT to MD, including transfering
the index marks).  My deck MD does not have an optical out, either.
After editing down the music on the MD, it would be nice to just be
able to transfer the tracks as individual tracks.


#13 of 17 by dbratman on Sat Sep 1 00:05:49 2001:

Scott 9: What are you going to make your clean copy of a CD-R _from_?  
I thought the whole point of transferring your LPs was not to have to 
worry about your LPs any more.  And your turntable, which (I've learned 
to my cost) will freeze up and go bad if not used regularly.

And you said that part of the advantage of electronic storage was to 
preserve the music for future generations.  So yeah, you should care if 
your CD-Rs go bad.


#14 of 17 by scott on Sat Sep 1 00:23:19 2001:

I make the cleanest copy I can get from the LP.  Sorta like the way I used
to buy an LP, then make a tape to actually listen to.  Most of my vinyl is
still in really good shape, but it's a pain in the ass to actually put them
on the turntable.  Well, compared to throwing a CD in and not having to flip
it over halfway through.


#15 of 17 by dbratman on Tue Sep 4 16:37:33 2001:

Right, but if the CD decays, then you have to do that "pain in the ass" 
stuff all over again.


#16 of 17 by scott on Tue Sep 4 18:00:08 2001:

Not really.  I just have to remember to burn a copy of the CD every few years,
which is why I write the "date burned" on each one I do.


#17 of 17 by gelinas on Sun Jan 6 02:28:46 2002:

A discussion of vinyl-to-CD conversions has come up on the SEMiSLUG mailing
list.


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: