Grex Music2 Conference

Item 98: punk music gone soft?

Entered by agent86 on Tue Nov 18 17:34:55 1997:

Is the punk scene dead?
What happened to the counterculture scene in music? Punk music now seems to
be completely identical to "alternative." Despite the fact that it has been
diveded into like a million subcategories, which a musical form dedicated to
being against the flow/being uncategorizable shouldn't be, it all sounds
exactly the same: break beat beat beat beat bridge break vocal. :)
Hmmm... has punk gone soft? From what I am seeing, all punk music now is about
*looking* like a "punk," not singing like one -- "Oooh! Look at me! I have
died hair and I look like Keith Flint from Prodigy! I must be a punk singer!".
What do you think?
99 responses total.

#1 of 99 by lumen on Tue Nov 18 23:21:49 1997:

According to some on this cf, punk has died a number of times-- this time
would make it three, if I remember correctly.  The first time was in the 70's,
the second time was in the early 80's when punk elements merged with pop, and
I guess the third time would be now.

Perhaps we should ask, "What is Johnny Rotten doing now?"  I believe he is
one of the grandfathers of punk.  How many people have truly followed his
lead?  What happened since his recent appearance and the creation of a punk
alternative to Lollapalooza (I forget the name)?

In the past, a lot of styles were categorized as punk.  Remember when Elvis
Costello was considered punk (well, perhaps he still is considered as such)?
How many times has punk been mixed with other styles?  Has the original
article been lost?

Personally, I'm glad that musicians are finally growing numb to raw
expressions of anger-- it made me ralph.  I liked Billy Idol-- punkpop--
because it was more of a sneer than a yell, and it had a controlled attitude.
There was some musical skill, too, but I'm sure that's debatable..


#2 of 99 by scott on Tue Nov 18 23:41:38 1997:

Punk is, by its nature, subject to die-offs and reappearances.  Think of it
as a scavenger animal or insect... when the bulk music culture gets too soft
and diseased, punk experiences a sudden reappearance.  

THere is currently a small thread about it in a newsgroup I follow,
rec.music.makers.bass, but it will likely end soon.


#3 of 99 by cabbage on Wed Nov 19 08:13:37 1997:

I think the question we need to ask first, is what is punk.  Like above, punk
is more than a haircut or color, but is it the vocals or the music.  I think
that the only way you can get into teh punk/grunge scene is to see little
known bands.  The main problem punk keeps "dying" off is cause it gets
popular.  The whole point is not to sell out, and when you do it becomes
altenative, and when you don't you don't get to eat.  That si the
problem....  I thin kalot of the mainstream out there is actually alternative,
and alot of the alternative is actually punk, its all just a cross breeding
between the two.  In this day and age you cannot cater to one type of music,
and still be popular, thats why alot of bands (Beck, Goldfinger, Green day)
all have songs from many different styles.  Oops, I talked too much, sorry.


#4 of 99 by agent86 on Wed Nov 19 15:14:49 1997:

See, I don't think that people can just view small bands cause when people
actually like music, it has this nasty tendency to get popular. A lot of
people I know who are heavy in the Chicago and New York counterculture scenes
always say, "I only like to watch independent bands." Problem: you watch them
and they go and get popular on you. 
So, I guess Punk has to die off even more regularly than it appears to cuz
it is a music form dedicated to counterculture, and music can't survive like
that.
My problem is that alot of the "punk" groups seem like they were created in
a boardroom at MTV: "Hey, Bob, have we elected the punk commision yet? No?
Well, get right on it! I wanna see some guys in overly-bright clothing by
MONDAY! I wanna see girls in ripped nylons!" Its all well and good I suppose
if punk goes commercial on me -- just not when it starts out that way and
seems to be a completely packaged, shrink-wrapped product, ala a non-punk band
(the Spice Girls, f'rinstance :)... anyways, now *I* have talked too much.


#5 of 99 by orinoco on Wed Nov 19 19:52:16 1997:

Cabbage...long time no see!  Hi there!


#6 of 99 by agent86 on Wed Nov 19 20:40:40 1997:

Cabbage! Long time never see! Hi there!


#7 of 99 by cabbage on Fri Nov 21 07:10:18 1997:

been longer than I care to admit.  Anywho, counterculture is mainstream here
in ann arbor, which adds just a little too much to the mix for me...
Glad to here from some of my old pals.  Unfortunatly, beware, cause I have
changed a tad (i.e. I grew up)  It was bound to happen one of these days...


#8 of 99 by agent86 on Fri Nov 21 20:05:53 1997:

Well, it's good that you can admit you have grown up. That is the first step
to dealing with adulthood. I have a 12 step program that can help... I used
to be an adult too. Actually, you always WILL be an aduly now, but I know
people who can help you deal with your cravings.
The first step is to sell your econobox car, if you have one, and buy a Miata,
which you can let me borrow for dates on weekends. 
Step two: go to the mall. Buy new clothes. Ignore the cost. Now, shred them
and wear them in public. If you can afford it, go to Renaissance and buy a
really expensive party suit. Wear it to your job, after dyeing your hair to
match the suit.
Hope this helped... tell me when you have completed the first two steps, so
I can help you with the rest of your journey of success. ;)


#9 of 99 by lumen on Sat Nov 22 03:49:01 1997:

Why the hell should I buy a Miata?

I am still in college vying for my bachelor's, so money seems to just flow
away.  Thinking about a master's, too.  To top it off, I plan to be an
elementary music teacher, so I can't stay an adolescent for long!

Why am I responding when I wasn't part of the conversation?  Well, at 23 years
of age, I still feel there are things I missed out on and that I need to catch
up to!  I still wear black clothing from time to time, but I am still dreaming
of owning a black leather jacket, tight black flight pants, and black mid-calf
combat boots (Docs, maybe?)  I already dyed my hair blonde..
I am a weird child of the 80's-- old enough to remember some of it
nostalgically, but young enough to consider some of it as novelty, and having
the freedom to pick out the good stuff.  I am watching, with baited breath,
to see how the retro-80's fashion and style will go-- techno is on the upswing
 :), anime is enjoying a comeback, and PVC is all the rage to wear.  No clear
sign of New Wave.. but then, the music scene is different now than it was
then.  Doesn't mean I yet adore domestic music..


#10 of 99 by agent86 on Sat Nov 22 19:49:57 1997:

the best reason to buy a miata is to let me drive it. really.
or cuz you can't affor a boxster.


#11 of 99 by orinoco on Sun Nov 23 17:48:01 1997:

And becuase Miatas are _cute_!


#12 of 99 by cabbage on Sun Nov 23 21:23:39 1997:

yeah, cute isnt the word I would use, "too small to fit me" is more correct.
 :)
Yay anime!
I actually took a polo shirt last night, ripped it apart, moosed the heck out
of my hair, and went out on the streets.  It was cool...


#13 of 99 by orinoco on Mon Nov 24 17:50:41 1997:

Oh, another anime fan, is it?


#14 of 99 by agent86 on Mon Nov 24 20:05:25 1997:

Well, if the Miata won't fit you, I guess that means that you can let *me*
use it more, huh? :)


#15 of 99 by cabbage on Mon Nov 24 20:22:40 1997:

that sounds about right...
I like anime, but I don't obsess, I just ike to support those who do
Its better than our cartoons, actually it's better than most of the TV here...


#16 of 99 by teflon on Tue Nov 25 00:59:49 1997:

...No comment....


#17 of 99 by orinoco on Wed Nov 26 01:41:43 1997:

Re#15:  Decidedly so.
Cricket, you casting aspersions on my brand of crackheadedness?


#18 of 99 by teflon on Wed Nov 26 02:23:03 1997:

...No comment...


#19 of 99 by agent86 on Wed Nov 26 06:23:18 1997:

Ok, hey, imagine this: a post that is actually relevent to the thread. Hot
shit, eh?
Well, here is the thing: there is another "Home Alone" movie coming out this
holiday season, Home Alone 3 i believe. Of course, the replaced McAuley "One
Trick" Culkin. I can here you wondering, "How the heck is a packaged, canned,
hack of a movie relevent to punk?" 
Well, thats just the thing: it shouldn't be. But -- has anyone seen the
trailers for this (I honor it too much by calling it a movie... perhaps
"cimematically enhanced sitcom" would be a good phrase)? Anyways, if you have,
you might have noticed the music played over the tortured dialog clips: Tub
Thumping/Chamba Wamba. This is a band that has been called "punk" by the music
industry, but this incident makes me wonder just how packaged a group this
is... i liked their music too. Oh well.
Anyways, I previously stated I feel that it is OK for a group to make loads
of money, for a group to change format for its own artistic reasons, or
whatever else. This is no such thing. It is...
Selling Out.


#20 of 99 by lumen on Wed Nov 26 07:01:52 1997:

I agree with cabbage.  I'm 6'1" and weigh about 265.  Miatas are too too
small.  Eek, man, you wore a polo shirt?  I have a black loose-fitting one
and that's it.  I wore them more when I was less fashion-conscious-- or
rather, less fashion-artistic.  But I do love rubgy jerseys :)  even love
playing the game, purely for recreation..

Chamba Wamba punk?  Yeah, not likely, but I think we did agree punk is rather
dead.  I like Tub Thumping, but it's not an example of punk at all.  Now--
did we discuss Billy Idol at all?  I mentioned him some.  He had a successful
solo career after fronting two failed punk bands.  That means he was tapping
into the sound that punk was going into-- yep, punk gone soft, or the merging
of pop and punk.  Some said that was what New Wave was.  Anyway, it's a
similar comparison.  I don't know if Chamba Wamba came from a punk background,
though.

Anyone remember my question: just what is punk?  I mean, they used to call
Elvis Costello punk, too.  Post-beatnik, maybe.  But not punk.


#21 of 99 by goose on Wed Nov 26 19:18:16 1997:

Punk will be officially dead when Tim Yohannon from MaximumRockandRoll dies.


#22 of 99 by lumen on Wed Nov 26 19:31:39 1997:

What about him?  I mean, I haven't heard of the guy.


#23 of 99 by agent86 on Wed Nov 26 23:09:34 1997:

I never said Chamba Wamba was punk, merely that that was how certain corporate
Music pushers were selling it.
I dont think it is -- don't worry. :)


#24 of 99 by agent86 on Thu Nov 27 05:38:33 1997:

Well, is punk music that sings about counterculture or just associates with
it?


#25 of 99 by scott on Thu Nov 27 12:20:09 1997:

I think that punk music sings against popular/mainstream culture.


#26 of 99 by orinoco on Thu Nov 27 19:35:21 1997:

The whole point of punk is to break away from the mainstream of musical
trends.  Punk tends to affect the mainstream by means of related styles, like
punk-pop or ska-core or what have you, but in the past when punk itself has
begun entering the mainstream, it's died back again pretty quickly.


#27 of 99 by krj on Fri Nov 28 00:44:56 1997:

Mmm, I thought the whole point of punk was the DIY ethic.


#28 of 99 by agent86 on Fri Nov 28 18:00:53 1997:

finally someone mentioned diy :)


#29 of 99 by goose on Fri Nov 28 20:03:42 1997:

RE#22 -- Tim Yohannon is the editor-in-chief of the punk periodical
MaximumRockandRoll.  He is a loudmouthed jerk who through his strict editorial
control (of a supposedly free-thinking 'zine) seems to think he is the one
who decided what is "punk" and what is not "punk".  It was a little joke.


#30 of 99 by agent86 on Sat Nov 29 16:05:22 1997:

Good lord. Punk has a periodical?


#31 of 99 by orinoco on Sat Nov 29 21:21:21 1997:

Doesn't everything?


#32 of 99 by agent86 on Sun Nov 30 07:50:29 1997:

Well, yeah, now that you mention it, everything does. Hmmm.
I can think of at least three different criminal activities with magazines
devoted to them...


#33 of 99 by lumen on Sun Nov 30 09:39:39 1997:

Excuse me for being clueless, but what is DIY?


#34 of 99 by tpryan on Sun Nov 30 15:32:17 1997:

        I take it to mean Do It Yourself.


#35 of 99 by agent86 on Sun Nov 30 16:17:44 1997:

Yeah, you take it right.
On chumbawamba: i just baught one of their CD's and actually listened to the
lyrics. I would say based on our  discriptions of 'punk' so far, it qualifies.
There older music (they have been around professionally since 1982) is *very*
punk... very anarchisitc, very diy.


#36 of 99 by orinoco on Sun Nov 30 18:08:15 1997:

I actually haven't heard any of their music, but from what I've heard and seen
of the lyrics they seem to be at least moderately anarchistic still.


#37 of 99 by goose on Sun Nov 30 20:38:23 1997:

Actually punk has several periodicals: MRR, Flipside, and Punk Planet are
three that are quite readily available nationally.  There are dozens of other
smaller publications, and thousands of 'zines dedicated to the ways and means
of that we have come to know as punk.


#38 of 99 by scott on Mon Dec 1 17:24:15 1997:

And there are also some stupid rivalries between those magazines, as I found
out from reading a couple issues of Punk Planet recently.  There are
fundamentalists in punk these days, just like in Christianity. 


#39 of 99 by orinoco on Mon Dec 1 21:57:17 1997:

Doth mine ears decieve me?  Fundamentalist Christian Punk?


#40 of 99 by robh on Mon Dec 1 23:15:19 1997:

Not Fundamentalist Christian Punk, just Fundamentalist Punk.
I.e. "so-and-so isn't REAL punk, but this other so-and-so is".


#41 of 99 by mcnally on Tue Dec 2 04:24:07 1997:

 you know, like "Thou shalt pretend to hate everything,"
 "Thou shalt not use more chords than the Sex Pistols," etc..
 Ironically, some punk fans seem to be more narrowminded than
 most about what music qualifies for their favorite genre..


#42 of 99 by orinoco on Wed Dec 3 00:26:49 1997:

Ah.  I get it now.


#43 of 99 by agent86 on Wed Dec 3 00:48:02 1997:

re #41: pretty rediculous, huh? This is the "I will not like punk music if
it is liked by lots of people" crowd, i think.


#44 of 99 by diznave on Wed Dec 3 18:34:41 1997:

I like punk rock. I burn one on my porch every night to keep the bugs away.


#45 of 99 by orinoco on Thu Dec 4 02:38:08 1997:

Kind of like burning your guitar.  Only different.


#46 of 99 by goose on Thu Dec 4 17:10:10 1997:

There are however Christian Punks and Christian Punk bands and music.


#47 of 99 by teflon on Thu Dec 4 20:57:16 1997:

...no comment...


#48 of 99 by lumen on Fri Dec 5 02:11:15 1997:

hey-- it's kinda a shame good guys have to take on a bad boy image to let
their message continue to go through.


#49 of 99 by orinoco on Fri Dec 5 21:23:50 1997:

Do tell, goose - I'm intrigued.


#50 of 99 by agent86 on Fri Dec 5 23:56:05 1997:

I Christian Punk is an oxymoron... these are the pretend-punks, who are
claiming to be "punk" based on the color of their hair, the use of
samples/distortion/whateva' to create a particular sound, and body piercing...
Unless, of course, they have an "over throw that bastard government cuz its
too nice to them other religions I want to see it crash and burn" message,
in which case I still don't like it ;)

What defines "christian punk?"


#51 of 99 by mcnally on Sat Dec 6 01:35:09 1997:

  So your position, then, would be that "punk" is determined by the content
  of the lyrics and not just by the style of the music (tempo, chords, which
  instruments are used, etc?)


#52 of 99 by robh on Sat Dec 6 02:51:44 1997:

I would certainly argue that the lyrical content is an intrinsic
aspect of what defines "punk rock".  When I hear music that sounds like
punk but has lighter, happier lyrics, I usually refer to it as
either "punk lite" or "bubble-gum punk".


#53 of 99 by orinoco on Sat Dec 6 14:28:28 1997:

Once again, the problem is where to put the boundary between punk and all the
swarms of punk-related styles.  I've heard bands like Greenday, Chumbawumba,
and so forth called 'punk', but I don't think either qualifies - Greenday
tends to be overly happy, and Chumbawumba doesn't sound very 'punky'
musically.  You need to have both.


#54 of 99 by lumen on Sun Dec 7 00:22:54 1997:

Oh, fuck the punks.  I never much liked angry music, and a lot of musicians
who started out as punk finally woke up and smelled the coffee.  I mean,
starving is ok if that's what you want or if doing punk music is your
moonlighting and you have a daytime job, but man, some folks wanna eat.

Blondie never was very punk, Billy Idol strayed from the hard-core path, and
we just discussed the fact that Chumbawumba decided to give it up, too--
anything wrong with that?

Johnny Rotten can just go rot for all I care..


#55 of 99 by agent86 on Sun Dec 7 06:04:55 1997:

*laugh* =)
I wasn't even aware people considered Blondie punk... I like their music alot,
but it has more of a 80's glamrock or maybe a ska feel to it.

I heard some "good" punk by TSOL a little while ago. It jammed! But then, I
don't really listen to the lyrics, I just sort of let them wash over me and
act as subliminal messages on me ;) In fact, I think I will go look at some
corpses in a morgue right now ;) Well, maybe not... 

About needing both a sound-format and lyric-format to qualify as 'punk,' I
would like to agree most wholeheartedly and suggest that this is the reason
that Abbie Hoffman isn't a punk ;) 

later...


#56 of 99 by agent86 on Sun Dec 7 11:51:28 1997:

actually I suppose the above post says something about punk music... True
Sound of Liberty (tsol) hasn't done much of anything big in years ;)


#57 of 99 by robh on Sun Dec 7 13:23:32 1997:

Re 54 - Actually, "fuck the punks" is a perfect expression of
punk attitudes, and any true punker would love it.  >8)

Re 54/55 - Yep, I have indeed heard folks refer to Blondie as
punk, although not recently.  I actually listened to my Billy Idol
best-of CD last week, and was surprised how happy and 80's the music
seemed to me now.  I've become jaded...


#58 of 99 by orinoco on Sun Dec 7 14:43:35 1997:

Well, what it takes to shock people changes over time.


#59 of 99 by anderyn on Sun Dec 7 16:47:45 1997:

Saw an album at Borders yesterday called Ethno-punk. Artists on it included
several that I wouldn't have thought of as punk, but then I'm not exactly
on the cutting edge there (um, Rock, Salt and Nails, Den Fule, Hedningarna,
a couple of others that I know from krj's world music prosletyizing :-) --
it seemed interesting thta they were advertising it as punk/world beat.
Lots of Egyptian, Rwandan, and other nationalities there, too.


#60 of 99 by agent86 on Sun Dec 7 18:54:13 1997:

that sounds pretty neat... I may have to walk all the way over to borders...
I wonder if Tower would have it? they are very close to my daily routine, and
they have a healthy selection of (or perhaps unhealthy selection of) punk,
goth and ska, most likely as a result of their prominent location overhead
that punk clothing/piercing place and in close proximity to the 2600 meetings
;)

I wonder why I like punk, anyways... I am, if not upbeat, usually pretty
mellow with a sense of humour about things... I don't dress punk, most of the
time, and my hair is usually pretty constant in its coloration.

Maybe I just like entropy >=]


#61 of 99 by anderyn on Mon Dec 8 00:02:59 1997:

I know it's an emi collection, same as the Folk'n'hell one I bought earlier
this yaer. So, probably available at Tower. It IS still at the Borders here
in town,
at least as of this afternoon, since I checked while we were there buying Roy
Orbison's Greatest Hits.

I would like to ask what the punk "ethic" is, since I've heard of that for
a long time, and I just haven't ever heard a good explanation. And since
this collection features several bands I already know I like, it seems
weird that it would be called punk.


#62 of 99 by lumen on Mon Dec 8 06:30:44 1997:

re #57-- I actually said something that a true-blue punk would love?  How
ironic.  I just don't groove with the agenda.  I don't disdain fashion, I
don't go looking for aggro, I don't beat up gays, etc., etc., stereotype blah
blah blah.  I did color my hair recently, and five years ago, I had my hair
fairly long, with the sides and back of my head shaved to the skin (all my
dormmates were coaxing me to make it a mohawk).  Oh yeah.  I was never really
keen on anarchist philosophy.

I'll just Mode until I die, I guess.

Billy Idol actually shocked people when he was popular?  Eh?  I was saying
he got popular after 2 failed punk bands, and when he got happier and
80's-sounding (i.e., jumped on a bandwagon).

re #55-- I haven't heard anything but _The Best of Blondie_, so I couldn't
really classify them.  From that collection alone, they weren't just glamrock,
they were indeed post-punk (Atomic, Rip Her To Shreds), and they eventually
merged a little into technopop sounds (Heart of Glass special mix, Rapture,
Atomic, etc.)

I enjoy a little sarcasm, a little attitude, a little torture in my music;
but generally not to the degree that bands are doing now.

Guess I gotta love my techno :)


#63 of 99 by agent86 on Mon Dec 8 09:07:34 1997:

Agreed. <- Wow. That has to be my least wordy post to date, so maybe I will
add some filler.
Filler part 1) I don't think that punk means that you have to go around
beating up gays or anything else. I think punk is simply going against the
grain. Especially now. In the last decade, every fringe group except the
Southern Baptists has moved to the center, moderated its stance. Punk is no
different. I think punk means, to the majority of people who like to think
they are punks, anarchism and not a lot else -- pissing on the flag, if you
will. (This is assuming that they are not total airheads who aren't into much
of anything at all).
Filler part 2: Twila Oxley Price.... did you ever have any involvement with
the Steiner school? I recognize your (just a tad unusual) name from somewhere
;)

Feel freee to respond to the filler, babes :)


#64 of 99 by robh on Mon Dec 8 12:25:04 1997:

In fact, most of the punks I've known would rather beat up
homophobes than beat up gays.  >8)


#65 of 99 by anderyn on Mon Dec 8 16:22:25 1997:

Nope. :-) 

Well, upon listening to the album, it's way cool. I like it a lot. 
Instant sonic bliss. But I still don't know if it's punk.
Bands(sing out if you know of 'em!):
Yehuda Poliker (Israel)
Ciudad Jardin (Spain)
Pyx Lax (Greece)
Rock, Salt and Nails (Scotland)
Den Fule (Sweden)
Mano NEgra (France)
Parsha Club (Okinawa Japan)
Raz, Dwa, Trzy (Poland)
MAu MAu (Italy)
Black 47 (USA)
Parlamas do Sucesso (Brazil)
Ciu Jian (China)
Shoogilnifty (Scotland)
Hedningarna (Sweden)
Wilmer X (Sweden)
I have or have heard albums by: Rock Salt and Nails, Den Fule, Shoogilnifty,
and Hedningarna. 


#66 of 99 by mcnally on Mon Dec 8 18:16:14 1997:

  I've heard stuff by Mano Negra before, though don't have any of
  their recordings..


#67 of 99 by krj on Mon Dec 8 21:13:50 1997:

I'll have to loan Twila some Black 47 CDs.


#68 of 99 by orinoco on Mon Dec 8 22:31:07 1997:

I've heard some Black 47, but I don't know as I'd call it punk...


#69 of 99 by agent86 on Mon Dec 8 23:03:29 1997:

See, Miles? That is why you aren't a Music Company CEO =]


#70 of 99 by lumen on Tue Dec 9 01:36:54 1997:

re #64:  That just goes to show how very much times have changed.  In fact,
playing The Village People doesn't annoy very many of them anymore.  (Maybe
a lot of punks used to be the sort of gay bashers who wouldn't admit they were
gay themselves?)  Who knows..


#71 of 99 by teflon on Wed Dec 10 02:18:01 1997:

Black 47? Punk?  That is so far out!  I guess you could call it that, in that
they have a "rah, rah, rah, F*ck the system" attitude...  But I don't know...
What would that make them, "Celtic Punk?"


#72 of 99 by goose on Wed Dec 10 17:15:47 1997:

re#70 -- IN addition to the Christian-Punks, there is the whole
Queer-Punk scene.   Check out the Queers, and Pansy Division.


#73 of 99 by lumen on Wed Dec 10 18:57:00 1997:

it is a rather interesting phenomenon, isn't it?


#74 of 99 by orinoco on Wed Dec 10 22:40:46 1997:

Well, you can crossbreed more or less anything with Punk fairly easily, just
by giving it more of a raw edge, or so it seems to me.  So Celtic-punk, or
anything else, would be less difficult to arrange than some combinations.


#75 of 99 by lumen on Fri Dec 12 07:49:49 1997:

Definitely something to think about.  But punk has never *ever* been attached
to any sort of black music.  That's where epithets like 'gangsta' and
'criminal' come in.


#76 of 99 by orinoco on Fri Dec 12 23:21:50 1997:

Well, there's been rap that comes fairly close to punk, and much punk/ska also
uses bits of rap.  The difference is that gangsta rap actually tends to be
fairly heavily produced, and not very punk-ish to my ears.


#77 of 99 by lumen on Sat Dec 13 09:17:53 1997:

Right on the mark, as usual.


#78 of 99 by raven on Sat Dec 13 15:15:11 1997:

re #75 Not true!  The Bad Brains did punk reggae back in the early 80s.  
Fishbone did punk ska/funk in the mid 80s and they are still making
music. X-Ray Spex one of the original British punk bands had black
members.

As to the earlier thread I would argue that punk is not a style of music
or a way of dressing it is the do it yourself attitude.  Thus I would say
must of the true punks today would not be doing what is commonly thought
of as punk music but more something like free jazz world culture influenced
music like you might here from Morsel or some of the bands from Community
High like Poignt Plectrostomos.


#79 of 99 by orinoco on Sun Dec 14 04:04:42 1997:

See, I wouldn't call Plecostomus a punk band, but I suppose their audience
tends to have a punk feel to it...


#80 of 99 by goose on Sun Dec 14 06:22:27 1997:

But a band like PP or Morsel is quite punk in their ideals, maybe not
so much in their sound.


#81 of 99 by agent86 on Sat Dec 27 07:35:06 1997:

Ok, has anyone ever heard anything by Atari Teenage Riot? (Or for that matter
anything on the DHR label, relating to Alec Empire?)
They are pretty interesting in that they sound _very_ punk (both in terms of
instrumentals and lyrical content), but that they try to dissasociate
themselves with "punk" music. They have said in interviews that they feel
punk, rap, techno, and 'electronica' are all soft musical styles. I suppose
ATR does have a progressive sound, but they _if they wanted to_ could be
termed punk. Given this, and interesting question would be: how may bands that
_appear_ punk actually want to _be_ punk, or would claim to be?

IF you haven't heard any ATR, let me just say it sounds like punk or
speedmetal with plenty of samples thrown in and techno effect like
phasers/flanges. It's lyrical content is anarcho-political. Even if you don't
like their music, they are pretty consistently fairly progressive -- to the
point that listening to them is a good way to figure out what music is gonna
do in the next couple of years.

There are realaudio samples of their music on the web at 
http://www.soundz.com/feature/sndzite/atr/

(Honest to god, I am not a promoter or ATR or an employee of Digital Hardcore
Recording, INC. ;)


#82 of 99 by orinoco on Sun Dec 28 03:11:31 1997:

Intriguing...no, I've never heard of them, but you've piqued my curiousity.


#83 of 99 by lumen on Sun Dec 28 09:54:30 1997:

Anarchy.  Highly overrated.  But the instrumental content sounds very
fascinating.


#84 of 99 by hardcore on Mon Apr 6 00:41:41 1998:

I have been surprised to see almost no modern bands that are actually punk
mentioned here.  Punk is most definately not dead, as is made obvious by the
popularity of bands like Avail and there are quite a few bands here in
Indianapolis like Illithed.  Punk can not be popular in the mainstream, simply
because of the fundamental basis of punk. If it is the majority, then it
certainly isn't punk. Personally, I am not into punk, I strongly disagree with
the self destructive attitude of the whole scene. But punk lives in many forms
other than just punk. THere have been several music styles to come from punk,
the most positive, and in my opinion the best style of music there is, is
hardcore. I could go into the entire history of hardcore from the Teen Idles
to Minor Threat to Earth Crisis, but I think this already long enough. If
anyone wants to know more, e-mail me.


#85 of 99 by cyklone on Tue Apr 7 00:46:59 1998:

Here's a question I've always wanted answered: What's the difference between
punk and hardcore?


#86 of 99 by lumen on Thu Apr 9 23:03:02 1998:

Here we go again. :)  Someone may have to define punk a bit more tightly now..


#87 of 99 by raven on Sun Apr 19 02:22:53 1998:

I still say punk is not a style of music but the DIY sttitude.  IMO Balkan
brass band music from the ruins of sravejo is far punker than some suburban
kids playing bad 3 chord music full of trite cliches about anarchy.


#88 of 99 by morpheus on Sat May 2 19:03:33 1998:

I agree that kids playing music in sarjevo (agh, my spelling is fuct) probably
have a more diy attitude -- but the music doesn't reflect it. I don't think
any music form that originated with a 50 year old american musical style and
was subsequently processed through a foreign culture can be "punk" for the
simple reason that the music doesn't sound punk, and the message promoted by
the music (though perhaps not by the musicians) is nothing like "punk" music.
This is a discussion of music, not musicians (if you can seperate the two,
that is).


#89 of 99 by raven on Sun May 3 16:54:50 1998:

The muscian is the music.


#90 of 99 by krj on Mon May 4 17:28:06 1998:

Isn't punk itself a 20-year-old style?


#91 of 99 by raven on Mon May 4 21:03:47 1998:

Punks not dead it's just fat bald & old.  Ask Johnny Rotten...


#92 of 99 by lumen on Wed May 6 01:00:36 1998:

Still, we've been debating what punk music actually *is*.  If that logic is
true, then punk has to change itself to a new incantation just to keep a
rebellious low-profile.


#93 of 99 by raven on Thu May 7 02:09:56 1998:

re # 92 I agree the true spirit of punk is to not be static musically.  For
an example of evolved punk check the local band Poignt Plecstrostomos.
They play fast klezmer, Irish improve in strange time sigantures, now that
we are in the information age poential punks have access to many more
musical genres than the origal punks probably listened to in the 70s.


#94 of 99 by morpheus on Thu May 7 04:06:23 1998:

Hmm... I met them when they played at the gypsy caffe (on 4th st, i think)
a couple months back... they are really progressive musically. I like them
a lot.

Anyways, I asked the guys who I was sitting with before the show if it could
be called punk music. Judging by the answer I got ("Yeah, right, its hardcore
punk, in fact they will be shooting up heroine in the middle of a violin
solo") they don't think so, and their audience doesn't think so. It sounded
as if they don't want to be associated with "punk" music at all. 

On the other hand, perhaps the musician is qualified to do anything except
create music, and judge whether or not not music is "good." 

Perhaps a way to help answer the question "what is punk?" would be to decide
what *bands* are "punk." For instance, are the bands on the Epitath label,
such as Pennywise (one of my favorite groups), NOFX, Operation Ivy, Rancid,
and Millencolin punk? Why or why not?


#95 of 99 by cyklone on Thu May 7 12:50:26 1998:

PP is *not* punk. Playing in odd meters just for the sake of showing you can
do it is the absolute antithesis of punk.


#96 of 99 by mcnally on Thu May 7 16:09:47 1998:

  I thought Lawrence Welk was the *absolute* antithesis of punk..


#97 of 99 by lumen on Thu May 7 22:33:41 1998:

re #95: why so?


#98 of 99 by cyklone on Fri May 8 13:07:18 1998:

Punk is based on emotion, usually anger. It was/is a reaction to
over-blown attitudes that permeate much music, such as the bombastic
ending, the over-done dynamic, the overly-complex arrangement. Most
odd-metered songs lack the visceral quality needed for punk. If I were to
make a comparison of A2 bands, I would suggest that Morsel, which also
uses odd meters, is more "punk" than PP, since the meter of their songs,
at least sometimes, seems to be used as vehicle to further the emotional
impact of the song, rather than an exercise in cleverness.



#99 of 99 by orinoco on Sat May 9 02:55:06 1998:

Erm, Plecostomus seems plenty "visceral", if I'm understanding the word right.
They are kind of alcking in anger or angst, tho...
erm, lacking.




There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: