Grex Music2 Conference

Item 6: R.E.M. New Adventures in Hi-Fi

Entered by raven on Sun Nov 3 18:37:32 1996:

        Just when I had given up on R.E.M. I didn't buy Monster because
I didn't like any tracks I heard from the CD, they relaese the new and
I think very solid "New Adventures in Hi-Fi."  I like this album because
it creates a mood that is slightly melancholy (what R.E.M. does best) and
because it finds Michael Stip still in a questioning mode about things
like spirituality despite his multi-millionaire status.  The new music
is also quite nice with Perter Buck playing not just guitar but Buzoki,
and Banjo as well.
        My theory with R.E.M.'s recent albums is that they are an every
other album sort of band N.A.Hi-Fi is good, Monster stunk, Automatic
for the people good, Green stunk, Document was good, and I pretty much
like all the R.E.M. albums before Document though I don't listen to them
much these days except Reckoning very occasionaly.
        O.K. what do y'all think?
67 responses total.

#1 of 67 by raven on Sun Nov 3 18:38:50 1996:

        Actually now that I think about it Out of Time was before AFTP
and it stunk as well so much for the every other album theory.


#2 of 67 by krj on Tue Nov 5 04:46:10 1996:

NEW ADVENTURES, after three plays, has left me utterly cold and 
uninvolved.  It must be my age.  I've been an R.E.M. fan since 
RECKONING, and I found something worthwhile in every album up through
AUTOMATIC.  (I've got a great car tape of the best halves of 
GREEN and OUT OF TIME.)


#3 of 67 by krj on Thu Nov 21 23:35:35 1996:

   ((( linked from the first music cf to the second. )))
 
I'm linking this because I can't believe that no one else has 
responded.  R.E.M. is supposed to be THE great American rock band;
does their new $80 million contract mean that they are washed-up
has-beens?


#4 of 67 by omni on Fri Nov 22 05:27:56 1996:

 No, it just means they join the ranks of the grossly operpaid and
undertalented ;)


#5 of 67 by jor on Fri Nov 22 15:20:28 1996:

        I thought, that you were, a rock band,
        I think I thought I heard, you, could play
        That was just a dream . .
        That was just a dream.


#6 of 67 by snow on Mon Nov 25 01:50:22 1996:

honestly, R.E.M. kinda scares me...I like some of their older stuff, but...
well, monster just scared me and I didn't like it at all.


#7 of 67 by razor on Tue Nov 26 09:31:16 1996:

The only albums I own are Green and Automatic.  The only one I like is
Automatic.


#8 of 67 by jiffer on Sun Mar 2 04:49:27 1997:

actually, on the new REM  New Adventure in Hi-Fi album, the b side songs were
mucho better than the first ones....  But i also consider REM to be like any
other band, they are not perfect and they have crap out sometiems as well.
Course living only a hour and a half from their home bases is a bit of a fun
thing.

 I am fed up with Shiney Happy People though,.... i think i gag every time
i hear that damn dong.


#9 of 67 by orinoco on Mon Mar 3 23:57:20 1997:

I seem to be in the minority here, but I *loved* New Adventure...with the
exception of e-bow the letter, the overplayed radio single.  It's fairly
different from the other album of theirs that I own--Automatic for the
People--but I still like it.  Just don't expect it to sound like their
previous stuff.
As for the $80 million contract, just because a band is popular and rich
doesn't mean they have no talent.  Of course, it is easy just to coast on
momentum once you're *that* famous, but...


#10 of 67 by jiffer on Tue Mar 4 04:15:54 1997:

 i know, and even the talented people have bad ones.  Heck, i think all
artists, be it music, art, writing all have a few bad ones.  If they were
perfect i am sure they would be bored enough to try imprefection!  =P


#11 of 67 by jradio on Tue Mar 4 17:31:57 1997:

What's a damn dong?


#12 of 67 by krj on Tue Mar 4 18:50:17 1997:

It's a typo for "damn song," d and s being adjacent keys.
<krj stifles the Clarence Thomas jokes.>


#13 of 67 by krj on Tue Nov 11 19:46:10 1997:

From the gossip pages:  Bill Berry quits!  The brain aneurysm the 
drummer suffered on the last tour gave him a new perspective on life, 
or something like that.  The rest of the band promise to continue 
with hired drummers.


#14 of 67 by orinoco on Tue Nov 11 21:50:24 1997:

So is he going on to a solo career of some sort, or leaving the Music Business
altogether?


#15 of 67 by goose2 on Wed Nov 12 14:57:41 1997:

RE#13 -- The rest of the band is probably under contract to continue, wether
they want to or not, that $80M doesn't come cheap.


#16 of 67 by mcnally on Wed Nov 12 15:31:38 1997:

 re #14:  Supposedly he's retiring but what does that ever really mean
 with a rock star?

 re #13:  I think I'd quit, too.  They've got piles of money and seem to
 have run out of things to say.  Seems like for the last couple of years
 they've been running on ego..


#17 of 67 by krj on Mon Dec 1 05:05:15 1997:

There's a new R.E.M. item out for the holidays.  
It's a collection of single 'B' sides and other obscurities, and it seems 
to have some overlap -- maybe 30%? -- with DEAD LETTER OFFICE.
It covers the years the band was on the IRS label, and it's released 
by EMI as part of their 100th anniversary celebration.  

There was a time when I would have grabbed this up on sight.  Now it's,
ho hum, maybe after the holidays.
 
There are similar packages for David Bowie and Blondie.


#18 of 67 by mcnally on Mon Dec 1 18:02:53 1997:

  Looking at the track list it looked like the rest of the tracks included
  in that collection had a high degree of overlap with the so-called
  bonus tracks that they stuck onto the end of the "IRS Vintage Years"
  editions of the IRS albums that they released several years ago.
  IMHO the great majority of those tracks really sucked, but of course
  I am an R.E.M. dilettante compared to Ken...


#19 of 67 by krj on Tue Dec 2 05:46:29 1997:

I think Mike is right, that much of this new R.E.M. collection 
appeared on those "IRS Vintage Years" editions.
 
I should check to see if the R.E.M. version of "Tighten Up" is 
on there, that's one of the best R.E.M. obscurities.


#20 of 67 by mcnally on Tue Dec 2 07:07:21 1997:

 hmmm..  didn't like that one much, though I've never really dug the
 Archie Bell (and the Drells!) version, either..

 In my opinion the band was quite right in wanting most of those tracks
 buried, they're substantially inferior to their officially released work,
 even the B-sides on "Dead Letter Office."


#21 of 67 by orinoco on Thu Dec 4 02:31:19 1997:

Well, that tends to be the case with most rarities collections - there's a
reason some things stay rare.


#22 of 67 by mcnally on Thu Dec 4 05:38:31 1997:

  Well, that's sometimes true and sometimes not.  Some artists are very
  picky about what they release and wind up holding back good material.
  For example, Ken didn't you tell me that Richard Thompson didn't like
  "Small Town Romance" and would just as soon have not had it released?
  Wasn't that why it wasn't available for quite a while (though I'm glad
  to see that Hannibal/Ryko has re-issued it..)?


#23 of 67 by krj on Thu Dec 4 21:46:05 1997:

Yes, the buzz at the time that "Small Town Romance" was withdrawn was 
that the deletion was Thompson's price for co-operating with Hannibal/Ryko
on the "Watching the Dark" anthology.  I have not been keeping up with my 
Richard Thompson mailing list subscription -- it's too high volume with 
little real news -- and so I did not see any information about why 
"Small Town Romance" was reissued.


#24 of 67 by carson on Wed Dec 24 21:03:38 1997:

(supposedly, the band has been experimenting with a drum machine...)


#25 of 67 by orinoco on Thu Dec 25 03:33:51 1997:

So I've heard.  I dunno, I've heard some damn good stuff made with a drum
machine, but it's a big departure from where they started.  


#26 of 67 by mcnally on Thu Dec 25 05:55:04 1997:

  well, it's not like the stuff they're doing lately is anything like
  "where they started", so I'm not sure that's an issue..

  I think they should recruit "Echo" from Echo and the Bunnymen..


#27 of 67 by lumen on Fri Dec 26 01:55:47 1997:

I need to listen to some Echo and the Bunnymen material..


#28 of 67 by orinoco on Fri Dec 26 03:35:04 1997:

Oh, it's not like I'm condemning them for it.  I just think they're another
band - like U2 and the Beatles - that's drifted so far you almost have to
consider them two separate bands with the same name.


#29 of 67 by lumen on Sat Dec 27 03:24:09 1997:

*shrug*  Change is always inevitable for music groups, especially those that
want to survive.  Depeche Mode was changing their sound with almost every
album-- for the most part, each one is drastically different.  I mean,
compare _Speak & Spell_ with _Ultra_.  Madonna, on the other hand, was not
necessarily changing her sound as often, but she seemed to be having an
identity crisis that frequently.  I could probably go on with other
examples..


#30 of 67 by krj on Fri Jan 2 21:06:07 1998:

re #23: Richard Thompson, SMALL TOWN ROMANCE:  The reports on the RT 
mailing list is that RT consented to have the album reissued because 
he was horrified that fans were paying $50 and up for a copy, and 
there was the increasing likelihood that it would be bootlegged.
(end drift)


#31 of 67 by lumen on Sat Jan 3 07:11:32 1998:

Good choice.  Some fans will do anything when something goes out of print.
But then, there are the groups that are so fanatic they've got to bootleg
everything.

It reminds me of the time I learned Strange, a Depeche Mode video collection,
went out of print.  It was one of those Anton Corbijn/Richard Bell
director/producer projects, and I remember the DM mailing list had one person
who was desperately trying to find a legitimate copy.  As of right now, it's
still impossible.  I wanted one, so my sister merely copied her own pirated
copy for me.  I'd prefer to buy it, but it's yet not an option.


#32 of 67 by sironi on Tue Apr 21 13:50:50 1998:

That's my first post in this conference.
Just to say that I'm only a 90's R.E.M. fan (my first album was out of
time, than i buyed the previous document and green).
I love all of New Adventures and i quite like "let me in" from Monster.
luca_



#33 of 67 by mcnally on Wed Apr 22 05:34:15 1998:

  Do you specifically dislike their earlier stuff or just have no opinion
  on it?


#34 of 67 by sironi on Wed Apr 22 12:35:37 1998:

Not at all :-)
I consider myself a *new* R.E.M. fan, i mean i discovered their music
only in 1992.
I remember me loving songs from Out Of Time and Automatic For the
people.
These 2 albums makes me love the voice of Stipe.
I've read some previous postings badly speaking of Monster and decided
to post my previous message.
Also I do not very very like Monster but i quite love "Let me in".
I think it's just their album i like less (there must be one :-)
And considering songs like the last tracks of NAIHF i think they're
still very creative.
luca_


#35 of 67 by jiffer on Fri May 1 12:58:43 1998:

Change is something we have to deal with.  And R.E.M. hasn't gotten that
horrid.... they still make a couple of good songs on thier new albums.  I 
did love them in the good old days.  But then again, I only lived an hour away
from Athens and had a chance to see them in smaller venues and sometimes they
would surprise customers at local bars by playing.


#36 of 67 by lumen on Sat May 2 01:38:06 1998:

Did you ever get that fortune with the B-52's?


#37 of 67 by sironi on Mon May 4 11:20:42 1998:

jiffer writes
>they still make a couple of good songs on thier new albums.
What songs do you like most in NAIHF??
I love Electrolite and Leave.
Considering my tastes (Green, Out of Time, Automatic) and the fact that
cd cost a lot in Italy which previous albums do you suggest me to buy?
> and had a chance to see them
lucky :-), i would like to see Stipe singing things like "talk about the
passion" and "Time after Time".
You all are in America, what are they doing now??
luca_


#38 of 67 by mcnally on Mon May 4 19:44:33 1998:

  People's favorite R.E.M. albums seem to correlate pretty well to the
  albums that they first listened to, so your opinions may turn out to
  be pretty different from my own, but my favorite R.E.M. albums are
  "Life's Right Pageant" and "Murmur"..


#39 of 67 by sironi on Tue May 5 07:02:46 1998:

In my case that's true for 2/3 (I bought Green AFTER NAIHF)
I'll buy "Murmur" (when i'll have the money :-( and then i'll say you
my opinion on it
luca_


#40 of 67 by krj on Wed May 6 13:37:28 1998:

To attempt to answer sironi's last question, "What are they doing now?"
I get the impression that the last world tour really wore them out.
Drummer Bill Berry, who suffered a brain aneurysm on the European 
part of the last tour, has quit the band.  Everybody else has been 
pretty quiet except for guitarist Peter Buck, who has been turning
up in various other projects.  
 
I haven't heard any rumors of when there might be a new R.E.M.
album.


#41 of 67 by diznave on Fri May 15 16:28:30 1998:

I wonder when Spinal Tap might put out a new album. Maybe throw some free-form
exploritory jazz on there. 


#42 of 67 by jiffer on Sun May 24 17:17:54 1998:

I don't think they are going anything at the moment... i like Murmur alot as
well.  A lot has gone on, and I suspect that with the leaving of Berry, the
band doesn't feel as complete.  I never got to see B-52's like that, but I
have heard rumours of such happenings.  And with one of the brothers that died
from AIDs.


#43 of 67 by lumen on Mon May 25 23:38:44 1998:

That would be Ricky Wilson, as I understand it.  His sister Cindy couldn't
handle the stresses of being in the band after he died, so she left after
_Cosmic Thing_ was made, apparently.


#44 of 67 by krj on Wed Jun 24 05:47:33 1998:

Just seen today: a new album from Peter Buck's side project, the band 
Tuatara.  The band has gone from a trio to (maybe) an 8-piece;
the tune being played in the cd store sounded sort of latin-jazz-ish.
 
Also, I've been meaning to mention that Michael Stipe has published a book
of photographs about Patti Smith's return-from-retirement tour.


#45 of 67 by sironi on Wed Jun 24 06:28:53 1998:

I've heard a voice about a Stipe solo album with Patti Smith.
luca_


#46 of 67 by orinoco on Wed Jun 24 15:01:58 1998:

Now that could be interesting...has anyone else heard about this?


#47 of 67 by sironi on Fri Jun 26 13:05:34 1998:

I've heard it on the italian mass-media.
I'll never bet on it :-)
luca_


#48 of 67 by krj on Tue Oct 20 16:07:26 1998:

Interesting Michael Stipe interview at:
 http://www.canoe.ca/JamMusic/oct18_stipe.html
 
Part of the press torrent for the new album, no doubt.


#49 of 67 by krj on Thu Oct 29 19:50:00 1998:

OK, so who will be the first to buy and review the new R.E.M. album?
The critics are falling over themselves to praise it.


#50 of 67 by lumen on Fri Oct 30 00:35:59 1998:

hehehehehe..that could be a bad sign..


#51 of 67 by mcnally on Fri Oct 30 03:55:07 1998:

  I'm about three or four albums behind at this point and not well
  motivated to catch up..


#52 of 67 by goose on Fri Oct 30 15:37:51 1998:

I heard a snippet on NPR, and am not interested in the least bit.


#53 of 67 by lumen on Sun Nov 1 00:35:30 1998:

It tells you critics are subject to their own tastes at the expense of
objectivity, I suppose.  But to each their own.


#54 of 67 by sironi on Thu Nov 5 13:05:10 1998:

I've listen Day Sleeper in mp3 format.
It's a good song, i think I'll buy the album for Christmas.

luca_


#55 of 67 by jiffer on Thu Nov 5 15:47:12 1998:

I read somewhere today taht Day Sleeper is not going to be like the rest of
the songs on the album.  Day Sleeper is more like their old stuff but the rest
is "experimental"


#56 of 67 by sironi on Fri Nov 6 07:22:36 1998:

I hope not in the way Monster was :-)
luca_


#57 of 67 by krj on Thu Feb 11 22:11:01 1999:

REM have announced a tour schedule for summer 1999.  If I read the 
confusing schedule on the NME web article correctly, they will be 
appearing at Pine Knob (the big Detroit-area music amphitheatre)
on August 23.
 
In the NME article, REM denies that they reversed their decision on 
touring because of poor album sales for UP.


#58 of 67 by mcnally on Fri Feb 12 03:12:13 1999:

  They've got to have enough money by now that poor sales of one album
  don't force them into a tour they don't want to do..


#59 of 67 by krj on Thu Apr 22 04:54:10 1999:

REM is doing a Special Guest Star appearance on the Fox TV show 
"Party of Five" next Wednesday, according to the coming attractions which
we just saw.

I just picked up a used copy of UP so I hope to report on it soon.


#60 of 67 by pthomas on Thu Jul 22 23:18:37 1999:

I caught REM on tour in Hannover, Germany on June 29, and I'm on orders
from Ken to report on the experience. ;-)

Though I hadn't seen them in concert before, I feel secure in saying that
it was damn good. They played a lot of old stuff ("So. Central Rain",
"Fall On Me", "Cuyahoga", and one other song off of Lifes Rich Pageant.),
the usual staples from _Document_ and _Out Of Time_, and 4 tracks from
_Automatic_ ("Everybody Hurts", "Man On The Moon" "Sweetness Follows", and
what Stipe called the 'second cousin' of "Find The River" (it was faster,
and with more guitar, but still about as good as the original). 4 tracks
from _Up_ (all pretty decent -- "Lotus", "Suspicion", "Daysleeper", and
"At My Most Beautiful"). Two new songs, which, I am pleased to report,
were very good. Kind of a mix of _Up_ and _Automatic_. Three complaints --
three tracks from _Monster_ were on the playlist, Stipe made the "Ich bin
ein Berliner" joke that I'd already heard four times since I'd been there,
and this German behind me had the lyrics all wrong. I wanted to hit him.   
Oh, and I went with a bunch of hot chicks. Yeah, baby.

So, go see them at Pine Knob. You'll enjoy it. I promise.


#61 of 67 by gnat on Fri Jul 23 03:31:22 1999:

I wish I'd seen them at the Michigan Theater back in the day.

I liked them a lot better when Michael Stipe mumbled.  They seemed
much more mysterious...


#62 of 67 by krj on Mon May 14 18:41:20 2001:

Let's revive this ancient item for the new R.E.M. album, REVEAL, which
is scheduled for release Tuesday.

Tuesday night, R.E.M. are scheduled to play a song from the new album
on the Letterman show.


#63 of 67 by krj on Fri Jun 1 18:47:43 2001:

*nobody* had any comments on the new R.E.M. album?


#64 of 67 by mcnally on Fri Jun 1 23:51:49 2001:

  I'm about three R.E.M. albums behind at this point and don't expect to
  ever catch up (or, for that matter, proceed any further..)


#65 of 67 by ashke on Sat Jun 2 15:55:56 2001:

I agree, there is just less...joy? in listening to these albums?  They kinda
lost me a monster


#66 of 67 by orinoco on Sun Jun 3 18:11:36 2001:

I thought New Adventures was okay, but that might just be that I've listened
to it enough to get used to it.  Monster was the only album of theirs I've
actively hated; since then, it's all just been mediocre.


#67 of 67 by jules on Wed Jun 6 04:31:50 2001:

i like old rem. like fables and stuff.


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: