Grex Music2 Conference

Item 310: Acquisition: Filters and Guides

Entered by krj on Fri Apr 27 20:02:46 2001:

I've wanted to start this item for months, but I've never been able  
to organize my thoughts sufficiently on the subject, so I'll just 
toss out a formless mess.

For years I've been fascinated by the question: how do we find the 
music we like?  How do we filter out the marketing messages from stuff
we know we aren't going to like?  The thoughts became more explicit
when Chuck D of Public Enemy was quoted on his vision of the 
Internet-fueled future of music, when the five major labels would be
surrounded by thousands and thousands of little upstarts.

This got me to thinking -- suppose each of those thousands of upstarts
wanted to send you a promotional piece of e-mail every month?  Aieee!

For better or worse, one of the functions of the major label corporations
is to erect a filter screening out a huge number of artists, and to 
guide their buyers towards satisfying purchases.   As the labels 
lose control, how will those functions be performed for the mass audience?
How will they be performed for we elite snobs in the Music conference?
  :)
22 responses total.

#1 of 22 by raven on Sat Apr 28 03:29:58 2001:

Well most of the music in my collection of a couple hundred tapes and
CDs was either picked up through hearing friends music, borrowing from
the library or more recently Napster downloads of freinds recomendations,
or music I see reviewed in interesting places (like the Grex music conf).

For me the millions the record companies spend to promote their latest
one hit wonders is wasted as I don't listen to any top 40 music of any
genre.  Thus the argument the big lables act as a filter doesn't work for
me.  I think the more germaine question is, will muscians be able to make
music full time and support themselves if the big labels collapse?
Honestly, I don't know the answer to that one but I think it's an
experiment that should be tried because my best guess is that digital
music making cds obsolete in the long run would lead to a greater variety
of music from around the world being available.


#2 of 22 by krj on Sat Apr 28 05:21:55 2001:

... but no, when you say you "don't listen to any top 40 music of any
genre," you've just described a filter.  
So the major labels are providing a filter for you -- just not the 
way they intended...


#3 of 22 by raven on Sat Apr 28 07:52:27 2001:

Sophistry will get you nowhere. :-)


#4 of 22 by dbratman on Sat Apr 28 21:35:13 2001:

Recommendations of friends, and reviews that pushed my buttons, have 
provided me with most of my folk/pop favorites.  I discovered Suzanne 
Vega and the McGarrigle sisters from reading reviews that compared them 
to the Roches.  (I would listen to anything that was compared to the 
Roches.  Strangely, I've never seen a review of the Indigo Girls 
comparing them to the Roches, though they sound a lot more like them 
than either of the other two do.)  In turn, I discovered the Roches 
through the recommendation of a friend, who'd heard their record played 
in a store.

I discovered Steeleye Span through a cover version of their arrangement 
of "Gaudete" performed by a filk group at Mythcon.  So you never can 
tell where favorites will come from.

Most of my favorite classical composers were discovered in a systematic 
hunt through the Schwann catalog I was engaged in through most of my 
teenage years, when I had very little else to do.  I listened to 
everybody, and discovered some very strong tastes.  That was long 
before any of those "If you like A, try B" classical guidebooks came 
out.

Recommendation lists, e-mail lists, and the plethora of reviews and 
sound clips (even legal ones!) available online are a powerful tool 
that can counteract the stifling effect of letting too many thousand 
flowers bloom.  The one thing I can't recommend are those web sites 
that claim to tell you your tastes by comparing your known likes & 
dislikes with other people's.  A great idea, but if there's a single 
such site (for music, books, movies, or anything else) which has 
reached a critical mass where the recommendations are of any use 
whatever, I haven't found it.


#5 of 22 by sspan on Tue May 1 02:35:33 2001:

I've found a few of the artists I listen to a lot from seeing them on a local
station that shows foreign language programming.. seeing a clip of Kasia
Kowalska lead me to a whole bunch of good Polish artists.. I've also found
some Greek and Armenian music that way..
Most of what I listen to I first found through several CCM video shows though.
Other than that there's the radio.. although I don't listen to it all that
much, once in a while I'll find something new that way.
I've found a couple of things in those listening things at Borders too.
So far recommendations from the several email lists I'm on haven't worked out
for me.. the few CDs I bought based only on recommendations were pretty awful,
and the one I bought based on people on one of the lists putting it down
severely was fabulous.. go figure..


#6 of 22 by krj on Wed May 2 23:43:42 2001:

OK, but I'm looking for more discussion of filters, negative input, 
rejection: how do you set up your mental system so you aren't inundated?


#7 of 22 by dbratman on Thu May 3 00:45:36 2001:

By limiting the source's of one's input.  I no longer read folk music 
magazines, never got into web sites, and limit my discussion-list 
trolling to this rather quiet site.  Twice a year I go to Down Home and 
buy half a dozen CDs, and that's about it for me and folk music.


#8 of 22 by krj on Thu May 3 16:24:21 2001:

*waaaaaaaaaah!*


#9 of 22 by anderyn on Fri May 4 01:19:30 2001:

Whoa. That's kind of scary. Well. How do  I limit myself? I tend to read
reviews in spurts (I'll be in the bookstore and see that Folk Roots is there,
or Dirty Linen, and then go scan reviews, but mostly those don't affect
me...). Some reviews that mention new things by people I know I like do give
me heads up notice, but that's about it, review-wise.

I tend to hear something (either because someone (and you two know who you
are! grin) pushes something at me, or I listen to the radio/internet radio
sites) and decide that I like it too much not to have it. Or, alternatively,
I get a jones on, for, say, Eighties music, and buy a bunch of it. 

Really, though... I've decided that what I need to do to filter my buying is
to decide if it'd be one of "the hundred desert island discs" that I'd keep
in theory --- it's how I'm filtering books these days, too. If I can't tell
my self that I really will listen to it/read it again, then it's not being
bought.


#10 of 22 by sspan on Sat May 5 02:33:37 2001:

oh.. I see.. ok.. I filter my buying by not having enough money to buy
everything. <g>


#11 of 22 by orinoco on Sat May 5 20:50:49 2001:

Hey, that's how I do it.  I gave up long ago on having a 'complete'
collection, and I settle for owning whatever recordings I happen to own.  I
filter my buying by only shopping for CDs once a month or so, and only buying
a disk or two at a time.  What I own is what happens to be running through
my head when I do my shopping.


#12 of 22 by gelinas on Sun May 6 04:05:14 2001:

Why is anything "running through [your] head"?  Where did you hear whatever
you heard?


#13 of 22 by dbratman on Wed May 9 21:50:38 2001:

Why the sobbing, Ken?  Down Home is a good retail store, but you can 
find lots of stuff online that you'll never see there.  Specialty 
stores remain useful, but they're nowhere near the absolute 
requirements that they were before the rise of the CD, let alone before 
the rise of the WWW.


#14 of 22 by krj on Wed May 9 22:45:10 2001:

I'm sobbing at the idea that I have to limit the information inputs.
"Folk Roots" magazine along leaves me with 3-6 must-have items every 
month.


#15 of 22 by dbratman on Fri May 11 22:45:08 2001:

One thing that helps me limit my information inputs is the quality (by 
my standards) of the information.  Years of numerous must-have albums 
that turned out not to be that great has assisted the rise of my stoic 
attitude a lot.  The rise of the Oyster Band, and the disappearance of 
Martin Carthy into the Watersons, were notable must-haves that it 
turned out I could live without.


#16 of 22 by krj on Sat May 12 03:12:19 2001:

Ah.  My guides have, if anything, gotten better in the last 15 years.
My estimate is that I've loved about 80% of the acquisitions which came 
personally recommended by FOLK ROOTS editor Ian Anderson, to pick 
my best example.

Sorry about the Oyster Band, since I'm probably the person who exposed
you to their existence... 


#17 of 22 by raven on Sat May 12 06:59:38 2001:

re 15-16  This is why downloading an mp3 before purchusing a CD can
save much heartche (or at least dinero :-)).


#18 of 22 by anderyn on Sat May 12 17:00:04 2001:

Some of us can't do that (yes, I know... dinosaurs... grin... but my office
account is firewalled against any use of Napster, and my home machine is
verrrrry slow, so slow that I don't think d/l mp3s would be worth it.


#19 of 22 by ashke on Sun May 13 01:53:37 2001:

Really?  My office had no problem using napster, and I actually got my boss
using it because she asked me how it worked.  I was really suprise how many
firewalls it didn't have.  But I did get a lot of music, a lot of obscure and
rare musical stuff I couldn't find or had on vinyl and wanted a good copy of
to put on cd.


#20 of 22 by orinoco on Sun May 13 14:56:28 2001:

(Actually, I beg to differ with raven.  During my brief fling with Napster,
I told myself I'd only download songs to find out if I wanted to buy the CD.
Most of the stuff I downloaded, I liked well enough that I couldn't possibly
have afforded to buy all those disks.  The dilemma was solved for me after
the flaky power supply in my dorm crashed my computer and partially fried my
hard disk.)


#21 of 22 by ashke on Sun May 13 18:44:00 2001:

OOOO...bummer.  I put mine on cd as data files and took them home from work.
now I do have to sort through and get the cds that i want, but like you,
WAAAAAAAAAY too many, it'd be a project for sure...


#22 of 22 by anderyn on Mon May 14 02:43:27 2001:

My office specifically firewalled vs. Napster, according to the sysadmin.
They didn't want us using it. That's *shrug* their choice, since we've got
a T1 connection...


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: