Grex Music2 Conference

Item 22: Remember the Fabulous 1980s?

Entered by krj on Mon Feb 10 22:04:31 1997:

Here's the second item spun off from this morning's party chat with 
void and jiffer.  So, rev up those nostalgia engines and tell us 
all about those New Wave bands you are embarrassed to have liked.
151 responses total.

#1 of 151 by freedom on Mon Feb 10 23:48:52 1997:

New wave bands-does that mean like bands that came in and out kind of
like the New Kids, nirvana, Bush, etc?


#2 of 151 by raven on Mon Feb 10 23:50:44 1997:

Actually there is music from the 80s I still listen to like Camper Van
Beethoven, Laurie Anderson, Throwing Muses, Bongwater to name just a
few I can remember off the top of my head.


#3 of 151 by bruin on Tue Feb 11 00:18:36 1997:

Right now the radio is playing "It's My Life" by Talk Talk from 1984.  BTW,
their only other record was called "Talk Talk," a relatively minor hit in the
States.


#4 of 151 by raven on Tue Feb 11 00:31:12 1997:

#1 slipped in


#5 of 151 by bmoran on Tue Feb 11 15:08:12 1997:

I've made a party tape of mostly 80's music, including Soft Cell, The
Specials, English Beat, Wall of Voodoo, Suburban Lawns, Ramones, B-52's,
and the Tubes. I play it often, and sometimes when other people are
nearby!


#6 of 151 by ryan1 on Wed Feb 12 00:12:00 1997:

Even though I was very *very* young in the '80's, I occasionally hear 
some of John Mellencamp's stuff from those years.  I think it's pretty 
good.


#7 of 151 by jiffer on Thu Feb 13 13:08:25 1997:

recently i got the dead tapes from my older brother.  Apparently in his love
for techno music he is trashing alot of his 80's stuff!  Its amazing to think
i was a mere teenage for this stuff! makes the 80's a bit more heart warming
yet freeky for me!  I actually had rainbow streeked hair and black lip stick
and a total menace!  GOT TO LOVE THE 80'S especially when you start toforget
them!  (itis this a sign of old age?)


#8 of 151 by abchan on Fri Feb 21 15:54:42 1997:

Saw the video for "Love Shack" recently.  Boy it brings back memories.
<abchan is beginning to feel old  too>


#9 of 151 by ryan1 on Fri Feb 21 16:50:18 1997:

That song is cool


#10 of 151 by kewy on Fri Feb 21 19:32:18 1997:

but did ya know, ru paul's in that video.. before she was famous... had a
fro:)


#11 of 151 by bruin on Fri Feb 21 22:07:01 1997:

BTW, did anybody notice what was drawn on the wall when the male lead was
singing in "Love Shack" by the B-52's?


#12 of 151 by bmoran on Mon Feb 24 05:56:44 1997:

B-52's were in the _Flintstones_ movie the other night, playing at some
party. At another party, _Walk the Dinosaur_ by Was not Was (was) being
played on the record player.


#13 of 151 by lumen on Mon Feb 24 23:00:40 1997:

Damn it, I'm not ashamed of the 80's..though I think Devo's "Pop Music" is
probably one song that turned people off to synth.  Myself, I find myself
caught between nostalgia and discovery.  For example, I'
m slowly being sucked into the Depeche Mode cult, and I remember I really
didn't get into their music (buying it that is) until after Violator was
published; and yet I remember when People Are People hit the charts.  A lot
of 80's artists I am just now discovering because I remember one or two songs
of theirs.  The B-52's Mesopotamia, DM's A Broken Frame, Cure's Kiss Me Kiss
Me Kiss Me, etc. are some albums that seem fresh enough to me.  It's better
than abuse of power chords, bar chord crap, butt rock, and the garage band
punk s**t people seem to love these days.


#14 of 151 by scott on Tue Feb 25 02:05:52 1997:

The early 80's had some pretty good music, but the late 80's kinda sucked.
I like the current stuff better than the late 80's.

Bands I like(d):
The Police, King Crimson, ... hmmm...


#15 of 151 by jradio on Tue Feb 25 17:23:17 1997:

I agree. While the late 80's did have some good things, the music of today
far surpasses it.
By the way, has anyone ever seen the B-52's in concert. I never have, but I've
always wanted to.


#16 of 151 by krj on Tue Feb 25 21:27:55 1997:

1980's memories, #1:  Richard Thompson emerged from the obscurity which 
had cloaked his brilliant 1970s folk-rock albums, and he also emerged from 
several years of seclusion in an Islamic commune.  
His reappearance was announced to me when a friend kindly mailed me 
RT's self-released, all-instrumental album STRICT TEMPO.  
 
A year later came the final Richard & Linda Thompson album, SHOOT OUT 
THE LIGHTS, and amidst the breakup of Richard & Linda's marriage came 
their first American tour.  I didn't hear about that show in Detroit, 
but I believe I caught every other Thompson appearance in the area for 
the decade.  The first show was at the City Club in Detroit; Thompson 
was touring solo acoustic, and there was nearly a brawl between the 
quiet Thompson worshippers and the hoi polloi drinking and talking 
at the bar.  The next show was at Second Chance; it was a large band
tour.  
 
Thompson brought alternating solo and band tours to the Ark through 
the mid-80s.  The 1985 and 1986 band tours, which included Clive Gregson
and Christine Collister, are among the best rock shows I've ever heard.
(Other shows from those tours have been saved for posterity:
there is a legit video of the '85 tour, and a boot CD of the '86.)
Thompson's live work in that period was outstripping his studio albums.
His writing declined somewhat from the incindiary levels it reached in 
the 70s, and I think his work really could have benefited from a woman's
lead voice.  But he was still capable of turning out a few great songs 
on each album: "When The Spell Is Broken," "Turning of the Tide,"
"Al Bowlly's In Heaven."  His commercial profile went from non-existent
to very low.   Polydor dropped him after two albums; Capitol picked 
him up as a prestige signing.


#17 of 151 by mziemba on Thu Feb 27 16:19:00 1997:

Bill-  The Tubes were a riot!  They were the _Mad_ magazine of
       rock'n'roll.  I've even heard the Bill Spooner solo album
       that Ralph Records would like to forget it ever released.
       Too bad, too, 'cause there were some interesting tunes
       on it.



#18 of 151 by lumen on Fri Feb 28 06:50:26 1997:

The music of today far surpasses it?  No, I don't think so..I've never seen
sorrier acts than I have in recent years.  Most garage band s**t is stuff just
about anyone can play with just a little practice.  Damn the abuse of power
chords!  The 80's was a time I could depend on a hit-- and I can't say the
same now. Perhaps the late 80's did suck, but that's when some
super-alternative bands were getting really good..Depche Mode, Suzanne Vega,
The Cure, Erasure, and the short-lived Bananarama.  Don't forget, Real Life
also made a re-make of their early 80's hit "Send Me An Angel" in the top of
the 80's decade.  Short footnote:  Big kudos to Ken and Mark for encouraging
me to come here-- they sure know a hell of a lot more about pop music than
I do!  (Besides, when you become a music major, you learn just how much you
don't know about music, too)


#19 of 151 by jradio on Fri Feb 28 19:09:29 1997:

What was your last hit?


#20 of 151 by lumen on Sat Mar 1 08:44:38 1997:

It probably was "Love Shack" or even "Roam," when the B-52's did _Cosmic
Thing._  It's not my best example, since I thought _Good Stuff_, their last
album, was very underrated.  I mean, Fred Schneider sings beautifully now.
The Bangles' "Eternal Flame" was another beautiful gem.  I'm sure I could go
on if I knew which of my 80's faves were after '85.  My next CD purchase will
likely be this "Remembering the 80's" collection (and yes, at $119.85, it will
be worth it for 6 CD's worth) advertised on TV because every single hit they
list I seem to remember loving a bunch!  But like I said, alternative acts
were hitting the mainstream after 1985-- Suzanne Vega had "Tom's Diner,"
Erasure had "Chains of Love," INXS had "Need You Tonight," etc.  I also
thought the late 80's was a building time for Depeche Mode-- they finally
broke through the charts again, this time a bit more solidly, with "Personal
Jesus" in 1990.  Their 1988 album _Music For The Masses_, I think, helped
build that momentum.


#21 of 151 by mziemba on Sun Mar 2 09:47:29 1997:

Well, I like the 80s, too, but let's not get carried away...it had its
limitations.

In defense of the genre, it's worthwhile noting that Jamie West-Oram,
guitarist for the Fixx, was in on a Laurie Anderson album, recently. 
While obscurists might recall Anderson's 80s hit, "O Superman", the 80s
can hardly claim her, of course.  Anderson has been a highly interesting
experimental performance artist for the past two decades (see experimental
music area for more details!).  

On the other side of the coin, the 80s was the hit-factory decade.  I'm
not sure some of the musicians could've gotten all the attention the did
without MTV.  

All that said, I've stll got a lot of good memories of the 80s.



#22 of 151 by lumen on Mon Mar 3 03:16:03 1997:

Besides music, the 80's was a fabulous time for a new and developing medium
we call the rock video.  Man, that stuff was just eye candy, dripping with
abstract art and dramatics.  I remember some of it-- the old days when MTV
was cool, with synthesizer wizards spinning percussive magic, and European
New Wave bands painting the tube with telegenic flair.  Thus, I think Mark
is right about MTV in one sense.  However, I think we are paying the
consequences of it in this decade, not in the last.  Most of the music
business in the 80's was pretty soaked with at least passable talent.  MTV
was providing the UK and Europe with a creative outlet, at least in the first
half of the decade, and thus, it was the first bridge from the underground
to mainstream music (bypassing radio DJs).  Now MTV caters exclusively to the
masses-- and is no longer a trend-setter.  Bands with questionable talent are
flourishing, and I think MTV is playing a bit part in their immature rise to
stardom..er..a big part.  Watch MTV's spawnchild channel, M2, and you'll see
what I mean.  So MTV helpedthe Europeans get the attention they desrved in
the 80's, but now they are backing up the mainstream acts they used to
ignore somewhat.  It's ironic--New Wave was a culmination of punk and pop
music, and the sorry acts floating about now are just a belated extention of
where punk left off last, fading into technopop.  What is called grunge or
alternative now largely Is a descendant of punk.

Someone mentioned that techno will claim the lead in retro-80's styles.  I'm
excited about it.  I've seen the new techno vids floating about  MTV's new
show AMP, and it will definitely revive the old glory of 80's vids, but with
a lot more imagery.  Of course, industrial and experiemental music roots will
be brought out with more emphasis than in the 80's, and musicians will explore
this facet of synth on a more widespread basis.  Europe will not be leading
this time-- I saw a lot of Japanimation/Anime touches to the videos, as well
as clips of urban streets with Japanese signs.  Computer animation will also
be a staple. Ambient music will likely gain more ground, too.  It has already
caught on since it failed to do so when it was being developed in the late
70's.  Check out the experimental music item if you haven't already-- it's
got some great extensions relating to this discussion!


#23 of 151 by lumen on Mon Mar 3 21:16:43 1997:

Also, Mark, in regards to your comment about the 80's being a hit-factory,
that's one reason why I like the decade so much.  Party music was gaining
momentum as a trend ever since the late 70's, and I think it peaked when disco
acquired the name 'club music.'  (Club music is starting to improve in quality
again, but it will be a while-- possibly, it will be replaced with techno.)
You know of course, my good friend, that I listen to high quality music when
I wish to be an active listener.  I'll be the first to admit that 80's music
is usually just stuff that makes me want to dance.  I will also admit some
80's bands improved at the top of the decade and the first few years of the
90's (another plug for DM and the B-52's).  I am finding music trends don't
fit neatly into decades.


#24 of 151 by anderyn on Mon Mar 10 00:30:43 1997:

I've been realizing that I love the 80s much better than I thought I did.
It's the time I first really got into popular music, and so I have a lot
of it on tape. I'm trying to put together my definitive 80s mix tape,
so I'm quite interested in remembering who and what was around. :-)


#25 of 151 by mziemba on Wed Mar 19 12:11:05 1997:

Just check out that Rhino collection, _Just Can't Get Enough_.  I think
there are about 15 volumes that cover some of the great 80s new wave
stuff.

Between that and the _Billboard Top Hits_ series, you ought to have it
covered...



#26 of 151 by anderyn on Thu Mar 20 03:03:08 1997:

But I don't like New Wave. I'm terribly retro, I think -- I like Blue
Oyster Cult and Warren Zevon and all the horrid glam-rock bands (even
Whitesnake *shudder*) -- and so I got one of the Rhino _Heavy Metal
of the 80s_ compilations, though only the first one... I have some
of the Billboard, but I'm still looking for a few songs that I liked
and no one ever puts on compilation albums (things like Rockpool's
Tehy're watching Me and the one that I can recall the video for very
well, but can't recall who or what... it's an older male in his apart-
ment, and a teenbopper (neighbor? Friend's daughter?) comes in and 
attempts to seduce him, his fishtank explodes -- and it was late
eighties, I believe, though I'm not positive, I keep thinking Billy
Joel, but nothing of his clicks for that...)


#27 of 151 by mziemba on Thu Mar 20 11:27:03 1997:

Blue Oyster Cult was very cool...although they made their mark a little
earlier.

I'm willing to bet the video you're describing was a Billy Idol video.  I
think the song was "Cradle of Love", which was out around 1990.



#28 of 151 by anderyn on Thu Mar 20 13:26:56 1997:

Thanks, Mark. I kept thinking Billy, but didn't think it could be
Idol. 

As to BOC, yeah, I know they started out earlier, but some of my favorite
stuff is early/mid eighties. 
I'm pretty sure that the albums I like best were eighties. But I'm
balnking on which they are -- the one with the Tarna song, and Club
Ninja -- which no one else likes, sigh. I still think that some of that 
is my favoirite music ever. 


#29 of 151 by mziemba on Thu Mar 20 15:17:47 1997:

Well, *I* liked _Club Ninja_.  And _Fire of Unknown Origin_ ('81) was pretty
good, too...



#30 of 151 by tpryan on Sat Mar 29 18:08:38 1997:

        Rockwell's "Watching me" -- wasn't that a Michael Jackson 
song produced under heavy Motown records influence?


#31 of 151 by anderyn on Sat Mar 29 18:16:01 1997:

Really?


#32 of 151 by mziemba on Sat Mar 29 18:37:08 1997:

I'm pretty sure it was a Rcokwell song.  Michael Jackson did serve as a guest
vocalist on the song, however, for the refrain...


#33 of 151 by bruin on Sat Mar 29 19:50:01 1997:

RE #30-32 BTW, the artist named Rockwell was in reality the son of Motown
Records founder Berry Gordy, Jr., and Michael Jackson provided vocals in that
song.


#34 of 151 by mziemba on Sun Mar 30 10:52:17 1997:

Jackson provided the refrain.  Kennedy Gordy (Rockwell) did most of the
vocals.


#35 of 151 by senna on Mon Apr 7 04:31:44 1997:

In 89X's top 500 alternative tracks of all time, they had a suprising 
number of 80's groups.  If I recall correctly, though, alternative 
wasn't really a genre back then, was it?  Not with these groups, anyway


#36 of 151 by kewy on Mon Apr 7 18:49:51 1997:

that thing was pretty screwy anyways...
./


#37 of 151 by krj on Mon Apr 7 20:49:13 1997:

Nah, the 80's were when the term "alternative" actually meant 
something.  OP magazine's run was from about 1979-1985.


#38 of 151 by mcnally on Tue Apr 8 02:42:06 1997:

  re #35:  is "alternative" really a genre now?


#39 of 151 by senna on Mon Apr 14 01:09:19 1997:

Well, 89X now has a regular sunday morning show called time warp sundays
from10-12 featureing the best alternative music of the 80's.  go figure.


#40 of 151 by kewy on Mon Apr 14 01:21:31 1997:

if only i was home during that time..


#41 of 151 by mziemba on Mon Apr 14 10:42:51 1997:

I've caught that show, occasionally.  A real kick in the head...


#42 of 151 by kewy on Tue Apr 15 19:07:15 1997:

a good kick in the head? tho i find that hard to imagine..


#43 of 151 by senna on Fri Apr 18 04:06:02 1997:

where are you, katy?


#44 of 151 by kewy on Mon Apr 21 00:37:41 1997:

where am i? i'm here. in katyland... yeah, that's it.


#45 of 151 by krj on Mon Apr 21 02:42:05 1997:

(senna means, where are you on Sunday mornings, that you can't listen
to the 89x 80's show.)


#46 of 151 by bruin on Mon Apr 21 11:43:59 1997:

Also, Q95-5 (WKQI Detroit) is apparently reviving its "Club 95-5" show on
Sunday nights, with emphasis on 1980's music.


#47 of 151 by kewy on Tue Apr 22 00:49:35 1997:

oooh, gotcha.. usually i'm being dragged to church, and if that's not
happening, usually i'm trying to get in that last little bit of hang out time
in with greg before he goes back up north, but that's about to change, but
that's off topic.... i'll try to catch it sometime, is it any good? (the show
on 89x)


#48 of 151 by senna on Thu Apr 24 04:12:09 1997:

I wouldn't know, nor would I care, being someone who hates 80's music.. take
it off the modern rock stations and put it in it's own category, please.  it's
time for 80's music stations to play stuff so i can avoid them.


#49 of 151 by lumen on Tue Apr 29 06:33:34 1997:

You'd better avoid this item altogether then, Steve.  Well, I guess I'm just
a synth lover-- and that's why I love the 80's so much.  I also like the fact
that it was a hit-factory decade, although I don't adore all the 80's hits.
I am glad that technopop is making a resurgence after all this love affair
we have had with guitar music.  I love guitar music, but somehow the 90's has
found a way to show mostly the worst of it.  Also the feminist folksy-blues
style is beginning to grate on me just a tad.

I believe Alanis Morrisette's career should die a agonizingly painful death
if she puts out any more of this feminazi whining.  One example she is of why
I am not too pleased with the current music of the decade.  But I digress--
perhaps things are improving.

btw, wouldn't it be just crazy if fusion came back into style, or if musicians
, er more musicians started jazzing up their rock acts?


#50 of 151 by mcnally on Tue Apr 29 07:10:28 1997:

  (I believe the term "feminazi" should die an agonizingly painful death..)

  Alanis Morissette might come close to topping the list of acts whose
  careers I'd prevent if I had a time machine and a lot of free time on
  my hands but given the state of what's played on the radio these days
  if I were to start down that road it could keep me very busy indeed.

  Perhaps it's a matter of timing -- the 80s coincided pretty squarely
  with my adolescence -- but I quite like a lot of 80s music.  Of course
  like just about anything 90% (or more) is crap but there're certainly
  all sorts of classic 80s albums (and even more single tracks) that I'd
  hate to be without..


#51 of 151 by krj on Tue Apr 29 17:28:50 1997:

I just got a solicitation from Time-Life for their "Sounds of the Eighties"
series.  If I can find it, Mike, I'll forward it your way....  :)
 
I haven't listened to Alanis too closely, but my impression is that,
thematically, she does a lot of "my guy treated me so bad" songs.
This is a pretty old theme; it turns up in oodles of folksongs and 
doesn't seem to have any connection to anything Rush would describe
as "feminazi."  
 
But, Alanis is for the 90's retrospective item!!  :)
 
I have some 80's memory dumps on Talking Heads and R.E.M. which will 
get typed in when I have some time.


#52 of 151 by orinoco on Tue Apr 29 23:07:30 1997:

Well, we have enough angry female singer-songwriter types that many of them
no longer seem genuine, in the same way that later grunge or punk acts seemed
to be following a trend rather than expressing any real anger or pain.  Some,
such as Tori Amos, Paula Cole, Laura Nyro, etcetera, I adore.  Alanis is one
that I could really do without.


#53 of 151 by kewy on Tue Apr 29 23:35:15 1997:

i agree about the alanis being a bad act, but going to earlier, i wouldn't
put her as a "feminazi" act, the songs of hers that i've heard
(unfortunately), are not so vicious as "all men are bad, men should die, women
rule, yada yada yada" that's feminazi to me, there are only 2 songs of hers
that i can think of are really bitter ones.. and in my opinion those happen
to be the lesser of her evils.  on another women folksy bluesy stuff, i'm
really liking the new ani difranco single that they're playing, a lot.


#54 of 151 by orinoco on Thu May 1 20:44:16 1997:

Hmm...haven't heard it yet.  Which should come as no surprise, being as I
haven't listened to the radio in some time.  


#55 of 151 by mziemba on Sat May 3 07:15:12 1997:

Actually, I've heard all of the Alanis album, and not all the songs are
bad-guy songs.  In fact, one in current rotation is about a rather nice guy.
So, even though I'm not rushing out to buy her album, I will have to give her
credit for putting together a good album.  And that's probably just as much
due to Madonna's crack marketing team at Maverick Records, another musician
I'm loathe to defend, but will, if pressed.  (How's *that* for an eighties
tie-in?)


#56 of 151 by orinoco on Sat May 3 15:39:08 1997:

Most impressive, mark...


#57 of 151 by mziemba on Sat May 3 17:30:12 1997:

Thanks, DV!


#58 of 151 by senna on Wed May 7 01:04:38 1997:

sometimes I feel like I"m the only one who likes Alanis... Her new stuff
(well, new to me) is a lot better than her dance albums that came earlier in
the nineties.  Everybody seems to have taken one song and characterized the
whole album with it... the album is actually quite excellent and covers a
whole range of topics.  Three songs deal with unpleasant men.  

Feminazi is a way overused term... even Rush Limbaugh says that it only refers
to 30 or 40 radical feminists.  I have a friend who characterizes the category
of "progressive females" as bitch-pop, and includes alanis, Sarah Maclachlan,
tori amos, and others in the category.  The way he brought it up was rather
amusing :)

Actually, I like 80's music that bridges to the nineties, such as R.E.M.
(though mostly from Document) NIN and U2.  Perhaps they survived because their
style of music was already moving to the nineties. I don't know.  Pretty Hate
Machine is an excellent example of the changing face of music--it combines
80's synth with 90's angst and hard edged feel.  


#59 of 151 by orinoco on Wed May 7 22:32:34 1997:

It's interesting, the way music has been swinging back and forth between
guitar rock and synth music.  We now seem to be swinging back towards the
synth end of things, which would be a welcome relief from grunge, grunge, and
more grunge...


#60 of 151 by senna on Thu May 8 01:32:18 1997:

I don't really mind grunge that much, but the recycled power chord variation
garbage is really getting on my nerves--for instance, Push by Matchbox-20
sounds exactly like five other songs that I didn't like when they came out.


#61 of 151 by orinoco on Thu May 8 03:01:15 1997:

Grunge as a style has nothing wrong with it, it's just the whole 'play any
four chords over and over in the same order and call it a song' style of music
that I object to.  You could play the same four chords over and over again
on a harpsichord, a banjo, or anything else--it would still sound dreadfull.
(And yes, this includes Philip Glass... :)


#62 of 151 by krj on Thu May 8 03:30:33 1997:

Not a big fan of the early Kinks, I take it...


#63 of 151 by mcnally on Thu May 8 06:09:51 1997:

  I think the thing which I find most depressing about what's played on
  so-called "alternative" radio these days is the persistent feeling that
  even if you've never heard this particular song before you've heard
  something nearly indistinguishable over and over again.

  Is there actually something to this or have I just reached my Popular
  Music Saturation Point?


#64 of 151 by mziemba on Thu May 8 09:06:23 1997:

Mike-  isn't all art mysteriously redundant, to an extent?  It's often
surprising to go back and see similar ideas executed long ago, perhaps even
in other places.  It think this only points to the common endeavor of life...


#65 of 151 by raven on Thu May 8 13:50:47 1997:

re # 64 This is is true to an extent but I think what #63 is talking about
is hearing the same old 4 power chords over and over again, followed by
a sappy snynth ballad.  IMO there is still good popular music old there
though, I think the newish Luscious Jackson album "Fever in Fever out,"
is good, and I also like last years Throwing Muses album "Limbo."  Other
good popular music seems to be coming from the Beastie Boys, Chemical
Brothers, Future Sound of London, Steve Earle, etc.  Just keep your ears
open and don't listen to commercial radio and you can find good music.


#66 of 151 by mcnally on Thu May 8 19:55:00 1997:

oh, I don't question that there's still tons of good music being 
produced..  it's just that I used to at least like some of the mainstream
stuff and more and more I find myself only interested in the margins.
I'm mostly wondering whether that's due to being oversaturated due to
recent music trends or whether it's an inevitable result of getting older
to which I should reconcile myself by trading in all of my Clash albums
for Lawrence Welk..


#67 of 151 by krj on Thu May 8 20:00:58 1997:

No no, see, what happens is that the Clash become *our* Lawrence Welk.
   :)


#68 of 151 by raven on Fri May 9 03:58:35 1997:

Actually I would say just the opposide is happening for me, it used to be
I could only listen to obscure indie label stuff, but now I appreciate
groups like the Beasties and  Luscious Jacksonwho are on Capitol.


#69 of 151 by senna on Fri May 9 05:09:35 1997:

Beasties haven't released much recently.  The funny thing is that one of the
major albums that supposedly defined grunge... Ten, by Pearl Jam... is
everything that grunge right now isn't.  It's original, well composed,
nonrepetitive, and well toned.  In contrast, the supposed ripoffs--Early Stone
Temple Pilots, Silverchair, Bush, etc etc etc are much harder edged, power
chord oriented bands. (or were, the latest STP album is terrific, and doesn't
have the slightest hint of grunge in it).  

Music needs to go somewhere, because right now it's mucking around on the last
vestiges of grunge and not really moving on to its supposed savior--techno.
I'm looking forward to the new Foo fighters release, but other than that most
modern music doesn't have the freshness it did two years ago.


#70 of 151 by raven on Fri May 9 14:23:07 1997:

re #69 Make that MTV music isn't going anywhere.  There is a *lot* of
interesting experimental/world music out there.  Techno is already dead it had
played itself by the summer of 94 IMO.


#71 of 151 by orinoco on Sat May 10 00:33:34 1997:

>Techno is already dead
...and hence ready to be the next music mega-trend.
Or am I being too cynical?


#72 of 151 by senna on Tue May 13 04:14:23 1997:

Grunge wasn't dead a the time it was trendy.  Techno's great saviors are
supposed to be chemical brothes and Prodigy, the way Nirvana and Pearl Jam
were for grunge.  But they haven't done anything chartwise or me-wise since
they've been released.


#73 of 151 by orinoco on Fri May 16 21:40:36 1997:

Personally, I think the best chance techno has will come from those who blend
it with other things.  Some people consider them sellouts, but I think that
the results of this sort of blending is more interesting than straight techno,
which tends to be more or less a metronome for dancing to...


#74 of 151 by katt on Fri May 23 16:44:46 1997:

all the really amazing Techno I've heard has been on, like, ULTRA indie
labels. . .I guess the thing about techno is that it's hard to make it
national in the same way, because alot of it's image has to do with its being
an indie thing. SO while amazing things are happening with it, you don't hear
it on the radio . . .ah, well, that's never stopped te industry in the end
in te past. . .


#75 of 151 by senna on Fri May 23 22:05:35 1997:

well, the industry hasn't started yet.  I just heard the second techno song
on the radio of the new wave.. there should be a lot more than that.


#76 of 151 by katt on Sat May 24 16:56:30 1997:

Hey, for all you 80's folks, there's a band playing in town tonite(check the
current for where) called Machina and the Monsters of Rock(or just Machina"
for short), they do these messed up eighties covers, and wear eighties cloths
and stuff. . .they ROCK and they're hilarious, and they are all amazing
players to boot. They should be playing in the area over the summer,
definutely go check them out. . .



#77 of 151 by bruin on Sat May 24 18:15:16 1997:

BTW, I recently picked up a copy of the CD "Village People - Live and Sleazy,"
which featured the track entitled "Ready For The '80's."  If only we could
have foreseen Reagan, Nicaragua, and the Cold War heating up one more time!


#78 of 151 by mziemba on Tue May 27 07:47:59 1997:

Katt-  thanks for the recommendation on Machina and the Monsters of Rock. 
Sounds cool.


#79 of 151 by jiffer on Sun Jun 15 14:43:12 1997:

 reply on the Techno music:  Most good Techno music is coming from England.
And all the suck stuff is created in the States.  There are a few good ones
but not too many.  I am rather picky about Techno... and would rather stick
to Robert Miles and a few others unless I got the oppurtunity to listen to
the album before hand.


#80 of 151 by lumen on Tue Jun 24 04:52:09 1997:

Well, it figures, Jen-- most techno was developed in England, West Germany,
and the rest of Western Europe (to a very minor degree).  In fact, most of
the synthesizer genres were developed there too.  They've done a LOT more with
synth than we have.  We're too afraid of it.

btw, I still think ALanis sucks.. her voice just really gets to me.  She is
the antithesis of all the music that was created in the 80s for me.  She did
dance albums?  hrm..


#81 of 151 by senna on Tue Jun 24 06:40:08 1997:

Not techno-style dance, mind you.


#82 of 151 by lumen on Sat Jun 28 05:08:28 1997:

Someone mentioned way, way a back there that we seem to be swinging toward
synth again.  And someone mentioned in the electronic music item that
musicians are going back to retro synth sounds, especially analog drum machine
ones.

Perhaps one indication that such a swing is indeed taking place is that
Orbital is in this year's Lollapalooza concert.    That's pretty significant
considering the other acts are reggae, rap, industrial, etc.


#83 of 151 by lumen on Sat Jun 28 05:26:34 1997:

mcnally is right-- 90% of music is crap.  For every one good song, there is
a ton of really bad ones.  This includes the 80's.  However, I concur with
his preferences-- I don't like much mainstream music anymore.  I _did_ like
quite a bit of the mainstream music of the 80's, and that's why I sing its
praises so often.  But more particularly, I've had a taste for certain styles
and genres, so there is some crossover.  Modes of music fashion don't fit
neatly into decades-- there was some music in the early 90's I really liked.
But I also agree the early 80's had quite a sound-- synth, punk, and pop. 
Yeah.. I hope some of that retro comes back (especially the old analog synth
sounds-- but in the case of Erasure, perhaps it's better Vince has been using
some digital techno samples in his tone bank).


#84 of 151 by senna on Sat Jun 28 08:58:21 1997:

Lollapalooza?  Well, the Prodigy is also headlining.  Other than that, most
of the major acts are corner alternative, like Tool and Korn.  Rap is quite
rare, actually.

"90's" music didn't really take off until Nirvana blew everything away with
Nevermind.


#85 of 151 by orinoco on Sun Jun 29 00:56:16 1997:

In *any* genre, lumen, a large percentage is crap.  You just have to know how
to pick out what you're going to like from the piles of stuff you're not.


#86 of 151 by lumen on Sun Jun 29 01:25:14 1997:

Correct, orinoco-- that's definitely true.  For those of us on a limited
budget, it is doubly true.  I don't buy CDs new very often anymore, and I
often try to find everything about a particular recording before I do buy it
new.  But as I said, I find much of the 80's mainstream and progressive music
very satisfying, so I often go with that.  I'm listening to Camouflage's
_Methods of Silence_, for example.  Different it is.


#87 of 151 by anderyn on Sun Jun 29 03:09:45 1997:

I tend to have lists of people I buy without any question and lists of 
thi8ngs I should replace from my huge collection of tapes. (Most of
my eighties stuff is on tape. And most of my filk/folk stuff. Aiee.)
Otherwise, if it's something new, I either listen at the store or borrow
a copy first.


#88 of 151 by omni on Sun Jun 29 04:07:47 1997:

  Forgive me for asking, but what the hell is filk?


#89 of 151 by tpryan on Sun Jun 29 13:26:09 1997:

        FIctional foLK music.  The music of Science Fiction & Fantasty.
I know I can get you to laugh within hearing one filk song.  I can 
probably get you to cry within hearing three songs.   When you can 
open the range of story and emotions with a fictional background, you
can have quite an impact on the listener.
        Check out the sf.cf, oldsf.cf, or oldmusic.cf for item(s) on
filk music; if there isnt an item in this conference already.  I'm sure
I gave a rather long rounddown on filk in the previous incarnation of 
the music conference.


#90 of 151 by lumen on Fri Aug 15 02:48:47 1997:

Mark mentioned the Billboard series of the 80's hits.  I found the boxed sets
of the chart toppers and found them a bit disappointing (2 sets of 5 CDs, each
about 41.88?).  I guess I must like sub-pop 80's more than I thought.  I'm
thinking about getting Rhino's collection of The Best of New Wave, but none
of the music stores in my area carry it (or perhaps not all of them-- I've
found "Best of New Wave" compilations in the past, but didn't check the
label).

I'd order a catalog from Rhino, but my folks threw out the mail-order catalog
guide we got in the mail.  So Mark-- how do I get a hold of this?


#91 of 151 by anderyn on Sat Aug 16 02:05:51 1997:

TRy www.rhino.com -- they have an on-line catalog, and I'm sure
you could order a paper copy. 

Feeling rather out of sorts with 80's music -- it doesn't hold up as well
as memory would have it.


#92 of 151 by lumen on Tue Mar 17 23:02:33 1998:

VH1's "Eight Days of 80's" series started last Saturday, and will be running
through the rest of this week, featuring 80's music videos, music movies
(Fame, Breakin', etc.), VH1's "Behind the Music" interviews with 80's stars,
and more.  If you want to catch some of the most popular 80's music
television, and other info about the music, don't miss!  It's almost halfway
over!


#93 of 151 by eeyore on Wed Mar 18 13:18:26 1998:

Rhino also has a really great heavy metal of the 80's set out...:)


#94 of 151 by lumen on Wed Mar 18 23:04:07 1998:

Oh yeah..Rhino's always servin' up the nostalgia :)


#95 of 151 by goose on Thu May 21 16:17:33 1998:

I was a big Men At Work fan.  That's my nostalgia for the day.


#96 of 151 by mziemba on Wed Jun 17 05:13:09 1998:

Apparently, the bandmembers weren't particularly fond of each other, which
helps explain their short-lived, two-album career.  I've heard a Colin Hay
Band album, since the demise of the band, and it was pretty good.


#97 of 151 by eire on Sun Oct 25 21:40:44 1998:

could it be?  I sped read all 96 responses, no mention of Duran Duran?  I
remember the whole British New Romantic thing...pretty boys in makeup and
lace....Adam Ant? etc...okay..so I was a teen...but I liked it...Duran2's
earliest stuff was their best...like their first album and rio...also their
videos helped define that decade...along with another favorite ...peter
gabriel ...(although he was around the decade previously as well) I dug out
the old duran albums..not a bad listen although I don't think I could stomach
the steady diet of them I had as a teen...What finally did happen to the cure?
I explored teenage angst with them...long before they made the
mainstream..might as well throw in Depeche Mode, Talking Heads, and David
Bowies zoot suited mysterious m oonlight...btw..any one remember a british
band by the name of scritti pollitti?  The lead singer always sounded like
he was on helium...(guess who had bbc in her head phones during that decade)


#98 of 151 by lumen on Sun Oct 25 22:50:07 1998:

Ah yes, the British New Romantics :)  Although Talking Heads is no more, David
Byrne did do an album recently-- forgot the name.  The Cure is still bouncing
around-- I believe they did a tour two years ago after releasing _Wild Mood
Swings_.  Robert Smith also performed at David Bowie's 50th birthday party.

Sarah says Depeche Mode is touring in the U.S. again, which I find exciting.
I'll have to keep checking the Seattle papers to see if and when they come
there.


#99 of 151 by gypsi on Sun Oct 25 23:18:47 1998:

Tickets went on sale for all DM concerts on Sept. 3rd...don't know
if the ones out West went on sale later or not.  They may be sold
out.  =(  Check www.ticketmaster.com for details.


#100 of 151 by orinoco on Mon Oct 26 01:26:15 1998:

The only David Byrne I've heard is his album with Eno, which I take it is Not
Representative of what he did w/the talking heads. I'll have to give some of
that a listen sometime.


#101 of 151 by lumen on Mon Oct 26 02:33:02 1998:

re #99: The event at the KeyArena is not indicated sold out.  It's on December
7th, which is a Monday, but I'm still thinking of going.

Not sure if I should secure it online or at a Ticketmaster location.


#102 of 151 by mcnally on Mon Oct 26 03:30:50 1998:

 re #100:  by "his album with Eno" I presume you mean "My Life In the
 Bush of Ghosts", which, you're right, is not typical of his other stuff,
 even the other stuff with which Eno was involved.

 I love all of Talking Heads' albums through "Little Creatures" but
 never really liked the last two ("True Stories", "Naked") (I do like
 the movie "True Stories", though, and like the songs as performed in
 the movie.  The band's versions don't thrill me.)  I also very much
 like "The Catherine Wheel" and "My Life.." Byrne's solo career, though,
 has been spotty at best.  If nothing else, it's proven how important
 Chris Frantz and Tina Weymouth were to the band..

 I've heard a song or two that I've liked from "Feelings", Byrne's latest
 solo effort and was thinking of giving it a try..  Every time, though,
 that I decide to do so I remember the times I've been burned and decide
 against.  Anyone care to offer an opinion and tip the scales firmly into
 the "buy" or "don't buy" category?
 


#103 of 151 by eire on Mon Oct 26 15:59:55 1998:

anyone hear Byrne's "forest"?  It's rather interesting...Mr. Byrne himself
is rather interesting...definitly on my list of 10 people I'd most like to
have coffe with :)


#104 of 151 by mcnally on Mon Oct 26 19:49:17 1998:

  I've got both "The Forest" and a CD-single of remixes of some of the
  songs from it.  I like the remixes better, the album is a little boring
  to listen to the whole way through..


#105 of 151 by krj on Wed Oct 28 22:17:13 1998:

In my mind the Talking Heads will always be a 70s band, and thus 
inappropriate for discussion here.  :)  Besides, haven't I done my 
riff on the Unforgiven David Byrne yet?


#106 of 151 by lumen on Thu Oct 29 02:11:07 1998:

"Feelings," if not great material, is packaged very unusually.  He portrays
himself like a Ken-like Barbie doll..the back of the CD seems to look like
a Barbie doll package description, and the liner notes show different
detachable heads with various feelings.  Plus, as the jewel box is clear,
Byrne uses the print on the CD and the print on the inside of the spoke cover
for a 'mood computer.'  The CD has an arrow on it-- you spin it in the jewel
box and look to see which mood is indicated.

Odd.


#107 of 151 by mcnally on Thu Oct 29 04:54:26 1998:

  Perhaps it'd be worth having an item on creative music packaging..
  My favorite recent example was the Future Bible Heroes' "Memories
  of Love" CD where the liner notes for every song were a different
  sort of word puzzle..


#108 of 151 by lumen on Fri Oct 30 00:36:48 1998:

I think we do.  Browse around; I forgot the item number.


#109 of 151 by lumen on Mon Nov 2 07:31:04 1998:

re #99, 101: Julie and I have tickets for the DM concert-- I can't wait!!


#110 of 151 by krj on Tue Nov 3 21:31:15 1998:

NP:  U2, "The Best of, 1980-1990".  I'd been eagerly awaiting this
since the news stories announced it, some months ago.  U2 has always been 
more of a singles band for me than an album band, and this set seems to 
sweep up most of the songs I care about.  
 
Copies shipped the first week contain an extra disc of single B-sides, 
including "Silver and Gold," which I have always been fond of.
The record company claims this edition will be deleted next Tuesday, 
so if you believe them & if you care, don't wait on picking up the 
first edition.  (The 2-disc version seems to be priced at $22 at 
most shops.)


#111 of 151 by lumen on Wed Nov 4 06:33:59 1998:

What would you say of _War_, then, Ken?  I *really* liked that album.


#112 of 151 by mcnally on Thu Nov 5 06:52:28 1998:

  I looked the discs over in Best Buy earlier today.  They seemed very
  heavily weighted towards the "Joshua Tree" and "Unforgettable Fire"
  years.  To be fair, those were probably when they had their biggest
  hits.  On the other hand, they're also the part of the band's career
  I find most intolerable.  I'd much rather hear stuff from the War/
  Boy/October period or the post-Achtung-Baby stuff..

  It's not all that popular with many U2 fans, largely because it doesn't
  sound like the band's traditional sound, but the U2 album I like best
  (by a large margin) is Zooropa.  I'd probably pick "War" as my favorite
  of the early stuff..


#113 of 151 by gypsi on Thu Nov 5 11:00:05 1998:

"War" is my favorite old album, and "Achtung Baby" is my favorite
post-80's album.  War had such a hard ad powerful sound, whereas
Achtung was full of trance-like songs, rock, and pop.  It was a good
mood swing album.

Zooropa is pretty good...I like "Lemon" for the dance rhythm
(perfect for a strobe) and "Daddy's Gonna Pay for Your Crashed Car"
because it has some neat sound effects in the beginning.  "Zooropa"
itself is okay, and I don't much of an opinion other than "they're
pretty cool" for the other songs.  "Some Days" annoys me,
though...too boring.


#114 of 151 by krj on Sun Nov 8 01:23:18 1998:

I'm afraid that early U2 passed me by.  The first current U2 release I 
bought was probably RATTLE AND HUM...  just last year I picked up BOY
as part of a 1980's revival program, but I didn't get any more.


#115 of 151 by lumen on Mon Nov 9 07:46:56 1998:

do get _War_.. trust me, it's good as a whole


#116 of 151 by mcnally on Fri Nov 13 07:00:22 1998:

  I was listening to the radio this evening in the car and some 
  station was playing the U2 set mentioned above.  One of the songs,
  'Dancing Barefoot', struck me as sounding odd and I couldn't quite
  place what was wrong until I realized that I had never heard it as
  a U2 song but was familiar with the version by a band called Xymox
  (originally "Clan of Xymox" but by the time they got around to the
  album with 'Dancing Barefoot' on it they were just Xymox..)

  Next time you've got the disc handy, if you remember to do so, I'd
  be interested in whether the liner notes reveal who wrote it.  I'd
  always assumed the Xymox folks but it sounded fairly natural as a
  U2 song..


#117 of 151 by cyklone on Fri Nov 13 13:56:09 1998:

Was this a different "Dancing Barefoot" from the one Patti Smith wrote?


#118 of 151 by mcnally on Fri Nov 13 17:15:00 1998:

  I don't know, I'm not particularly familiar with Smith's work,
  but it would kind of surprise me if it were.  


#119 of 151 by eire on Sun Nov 15 00:00:00 1998:

dancing barefoot is indeed a patti smith song...it has also been covered by
concrete blond...I've heard (and own ) the xymox version...definitly does not
stick to the original as far as the arrangement goes...and some of the lyrics
are a bit off....



#120 of 151 by cyklone on Sun Nov 15 15:58:28 1998:

Interesting. My band does the Patti Smith version, though a bit more
rocked up. I had no idea it has been covered so much. 



#121 of 151 by krj on Mon Nov 16 03:22:41 1998:

Ah, eire beat me to it.  Yes, the U2 "Dancing Barefoot" is a cover 
of the Patti Smith song; to me it sounds like there is almost 
no change in the arrangement.
 
I'm surprised that there are no songwriter credits on the "Best of"
U2 disc.  "Everlasting Love" is also a cover, but I can't remember 
who did the original.


#122 of 151 by gypsi on Mon Nov 16 12:52:18 1998:

I think Howard Jones did "Everlasting Love" in the late eighties,
but there may have been someone else with a song by that name too.


#123 of 151 by bruin on Mon Nov 16 13:32:24 1998:

There also was a song in the 1960's (1967, to be exact) entitled "Everlasting
Love" by Robert Knight (his first, last, and only hit).  This song has been
covered by Carl Carlton and Gloria Estefan, among others.


#124 of 151 by orinoco on Mon Nov 16 14:02:10 1998:

I didn't realize it was even legal to do covers without giving credit to the
original songwriters.


#125 of 151 by krj on Mon Nov 16 17:15:19 1998:

The "Best of U2" set is the only major label release I can think of 
which omits songwriter credits.  I'm really quite startled by this, 
especially since there are detailed producer credits for each track.
Yah, I thought it was a legal requirement too.  


#126 of 151 by mcnally on Tue Nov 17 07:10:39 1998:

  Kind of ironic after their record company tried to sue the band
  Negativland into oblivion a few years back..


#127 of 151 by krj on Thu Oct 21 20:38:51 1999:

I'll kick this item and use it as a hook to mention that the revival
of STOP MAKING SENSE is playing for four days at the Michigan Theatre 
in Ann Arbor.  Scott is calling for a Grexpedition to see it Friday 
night.  Details in the system login message.


#128 of 151 by mcnally on Thu Oct 21 23:37:09 1999:

  I *highly* recommend "Stop Making Sense" even if you're "sure" you
  don't like concert films.  If you're in the Ann Arbor area you shouldn't
  miss the chance to see it at the Michigan Theater -- during the mid-80s
  in the years after the film's release, the Michigan would screen it every
  few months and it got to be a sort of tradition to go and dance in the
  aisles..



#129 of 151 by goose on Mon Oct 25 01:08:27 1999:

And I fucking missed it, all five showings.  I'm really pissed.


#130 of 151 by mcnally on Mon Oct 25 03:14:09 1999:

  You might be better off, actually..  The film is still great, but I
  found it kind of depressing compared to the experience I remember
  from its peak popularity here in Ann Arbor during the 80s.  

  The showing I attended (Saturday, 9:15) was mostly empty, most of the
  audience was even older than me, and I was the only one who danced..
  Crowd reaction to the film was largely positive but extremely passive.
  It was a lot more fun as a semi-regular campus event than it is as 
  "just a movie".


#131 of 151 by orinoco on Mon Oct 25 16:11:47 1999:

Like the depressing nature of watching a good band play for a dead audience,
only without the thrill of seeing the good band.....


#132 of 151 by otaking on Mon Oct 25 17:46:59 1999:

Since I saw it for the first time on Friday, I had no past experience to
relate to. I wasn't disappointed in the least by the film or its audience.
Guess I'll have to find the right crowd when I watch it again.


#133 of 151 by lumen on Tue Oct 26 00:52:28 1999:

Wow.  A friend of mine is a David Byrne fan.  Too bad it's not 
happening out here.


#134 of 151 by jules on Sun Apr 9 04:25:11 2000:

im embarrassed to like the remake of kc and the sunshine bands 'please dont
go' by double you.


#135 of 151 by diznave on Mon Apr 10 14:44:34 2000:

Please don't tell anyone that I -love- Hall & Oates. I mean, geez....look at
their videos.


#136 of 151 by lumen on Mon Apr 10 22:36:39 2000:

Reportedly, they had a BIG problem with music videos.  I guess they 
didn't feel comfortable with the medium.  When MTV played its millionth 
video, which was also their first, they had a special on the 
development of music video.  They showed a clip of John Oates at a 
press conference with Madonna and Sting, among a few other stars.  
Oates complained that it wasn't quite fair to be judged according to 
this new medium, which required some acting ability.  Acting ability 
and musicianship don't necessarily go hand in hand.  Of course, Madonna 
rebutted it was very important.. but her whole life has been about "my 
mother died when I was so young, so I've been constantly ravenously 
hungry for any attention I can get."


#137 of 151 by diznave on Tue Apr 11 05:39:43 2000:

yeah, she seemed to thrive in front of a camera....Hall & Oates definitely
should have stuck to albums and concerts, though.....i think the single most
embarrassing moment in music video would have to be the Journey video, where
the guys are all down at the docks, in front of these (at the time) unused
warehouse storage facilities (or something), and they're all playing a full
band version of air guitar, pretty much.....and they're singing to this
woman...and her hair....and they're all **so** passionate...and the
bandanas...and the guys in their skin tight jeans.....GAWD....whenever i see
it, i want to crawl behind the couch...i don't know whether to laugh or cry...


#138 of 151 by jules on Wed Apr 12 00:18:56 2000:

i laugh. alot.
my fav video is the one for safety dance by men without hats....


#139 of 151 by diznave on Wed Apr 12 06:27:17 2000:

i seem to think that video has something to do with skipping through fields
with a flute and midgets.....but the memory is very hazy, so I could way off
base...

(er....-be- way off base)


#140 of 151 by otaking on Wed Apr 12 11:06:06 2000:

Yep. That's the Safety Dance video.

I really enjoyed "Life in a Northern Town" I guess it was the oboe.


#141 of 151 by diznave on Wed Apr 12 15:01:45 2000:

is this another MWH 'classic'?


#142 of 151 by otaking on Wed Apr 12 17:27:21 2000:

No. "Life in a Northern Town" was by Dream Academy.


#143 of 151 by jules on Wed Apr 12 20:48:23 2000:

heh im impressed. i played the oboe in jr high.
i always though the lead singer of dream academy sounded like davy jones from
the monkees


#144 of 151 by orinoco on Thu Apr 13 00:27:56 2000:

Funny, I've always though the monkees could use an oboist... 


#145 of 151 by mcnally on Thu Apr 13 00:43:39 2000:

  What about a million monkeys with a million oboes?


#146 of 151 by diznave on Thu Apr 13 03:55:17 2000:

How does the saying go? "Give a monkey enough time with an oboe, and she'll
perform a Bartok symphony." Right?


#147 of 151 by gypsi on Thu Apr 13 05:00:37 2000:

This one time...at band camp...


#148 of 151 by diznave on Thu Apr 13 07:09:33 2000:

 <chuckle>


#149 of 151 by otaking on Thu Apr 13 13:42:40 2000:

<lol>


#150 of 151 by gypsi on Thu Apr 13 20:20:27 2000:

 =)


#151 of 151 by otaking on Fri Apr 14 14:23:44 2000:

Now I'll have scenes from that movie running through my head.


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: