Grex Music2 Conference

Item 181: A Real Community-Based Radio Station for Ann Arbor?

Entered by danr on Tue Feb 23 01:56:09 1999:

The item on the latest pop music has kind of drifted into a discussion of local
radio stations and the lack of a classical music station here in Ann Arbor now
that WUOM has gone talk radio.  I wonder what it would take to put a real
community-based radio station on the air instead of what WUOM offers?  How
would such a station be staffed?  Could we enlist a lot of student interns like
WCBN?  Could it somehow be carried on cable TV instead of having to build
studio facilities and set up transmitting facilities?
39 responses total.

#1 of 39 by steve on Tue Feb 23 02:34:38 1999:

   Gosh that sounds like a nice thing.  The cable company would be the
people to talk to about carrying it.  Not going RF would make it a
whole lot easier to do.

   A facility need not be bigger than a space like the pumpkin, at
least at first.  I much more wonder what the problems/legalities are
with using music from various sources.  Given that CD's would want
to be played, so you have to give someone like Deutcsh Grammaphone
money when something of theirs is played?


#2 of 39 by drewmike on Tue Feb 23 02:50:39 1999:

It *might* be possible to get something arranged with MediaOne, though your
chances would have been much better about a month and a half ago when the city
was renegotiating its franchise agreement. 
*Possibly* the signal could be carried over cable. But you wouldn't be able
to get that kind of studio space from CTN. There's just not the room, nor the
resources.


#3 of 39 by mcnally on Tue Feb 23 03:09:43 1999:

  How would this differ from WCBN?


#4 of 39 by steve on Tue Feb 23 03:12:24 1999:

   Playing classical?


#5 of 39 by flem on Tue Feb 23 03:36:29 1999:

I recall that at last summer's art fair there was a table in the 
vicinity of the Michigan Theater and SKR classical that had a petition 
of some sort for a classical radio station.  I don't remember the 
details, but I signed my name and email address.  I haven't heard 
anything more about it.  Does anyone know if this went any further?  Was 
this a figment of my imagination?  I've asked once or twice at SKR 
classical and they don't seem to know anything about it.  


#6 of 39 by mcnally on Tue Feb 23 03:37:21 1999:

  #0 just refers to the lack of a classical music station, it wasn't at
  all clear to me that it meant that the proposed station would be an
  all-classical format.


#7 of 39 by void on Tue Feb 23 07:36:29 1999:

   an all-classical format would be a great thing.  after the demise
of wqrs, i jsut about stopped listending to the radio for several
moths, then discovered that msu's npr affiliate plays classical most
of the time.  there's still nowhere to hear classical music on the radio
between 4pm and 6pm, though.


#8 of 39 by jmm on Tue Feb 23 11:34:03 1999:

There are three stations that play classical most of the time -- WKAR in East
Lansing, WGTE in Toledo, and CBE, the CBC affiliate in Windsor. As void points
out, there are periods when none of them broadcast classical, not only the
All-Trivia-Considered time on PBS, but long periods in the evening with folk,
jazz, and Lake Wobegon. In addition, all three stations are 50-70 miles away,
which means that reception in a car or a portable radio can be a disaster.
And, of course, CBC has decided that they can attract more listeners by
intermixing some pop with classical, although this just leads me to change
stations. We definitely need an all-classical station here, but we also need
$100,000 a year to finance it. Anyone know of a source of funds?


#9 of 39 by scott on Tue Feb 23 12:12:21 1999:

Hey, micropower broadcasting!  After years of gradually tilting the tables
in favor of giant comglomerates, it appears that enough people are now
starting to think that lots of tiny stations would better serve communities.
For a long time there have been "pirate" radio stations of less than 100
watts, often just 1-5 watts (couple miles coverage), which of course are
illegal.  But there are some people in charge that are starting to try to make
it possible to have a small, legal station.  

(agh, I'm not yet awake enough yet to be eloquent)


#10 of 39 by cmcgee on Tue Feb 23 12:54:47 1999:

Could we do some kind of internet classical station?


#11 of 39 by danr on Tue Feb 23 13:24:42 1999:

What I'm thinking wouldn't be all classical, but I imagine a large part of the
programming would be classical music.  Basically, what I'm thinking of is a
"Grex on FM" kind of thing.  It would be run cooperatively, and its policies
and programming would be the result of what the membership decided and who was
willing to work on it.

I like the Internet idea, too, but doing an Internet-only would limit its
appeal and reach.


#12 of 39 by steve on Tue Feb 23 16:04:04 1999:

    Ah, but would it limit its reach as much as a low power system would?
What Scott says makes sense, and in a "grexian" sense would be the way to
go.  The net would be heard over all Ann Arbor, unlike the a little 5W
station.
   I'm still wondering how you legally broadcast music.  I think that
might be harder to deal with than the technical aspects of how to get
the signal out?


#13 of 39 by rcurl on Tue Feb 23 17:01:34 1999:

Do you mean the royalty questions? I don't know how that is handled, even
for music for which the copyright has expired, because the *performance*
can still be copyrighted. 


#14 of 39 by cmcgee on Tue Feb 23 17:19:05 1999:

You get performance licenses from the organizations who hold the license. 
ASCAP is the one that comes to mind, although there is another that is equally
universal.  After you copyright music, you register the copyright with one
of these performance organizations.  They monitor the airwaves, stages, etc,
and collect royalties from anyone who plays your music, then remit part of
that royalty back to you the musician.

The monitoring is partly sampling, and the money is paid to ASCAP, etc, in
the form of a yearly licensing fee.  Bars, radio stations, music venues of
all sorts pay yearly fees to the performance licensing organization.  


#15 of 39 by rcurl on Tue Feb 23 17:34:29 1999:

I would presume that bars pay for this in the service contract for their
juke boxes. Do you have any idea how much it costs per piece played?


#16 of 39 by steve on Tue Feb 23 19:37:52 1999:

   Right Rane, its the costs and how to pay (and when) for playing various
things that I could see as the hardest part to overcome.


#17 of 39 by cmcgee on Tue Feb 23 20:53:28 1999:

They send you a bill based on 1) how many of their pieces of music you played,
and 2) the size of the audience listening.  


#18 of 39 by richard on Tue Feb 23 23:22:29 1999:

have the name for it....

RADIO GREX!

perfect little public access outlet with a cool name that crosspromotes
the computer bbs of the same name :)


#19 of 39 by cyklone on Tue Feb 23 23:59:31 1999:

Re #14: BMI (SESAC is another more recent one)


#20 of 39 by scg on Wed Feb 24 00:04:00 1999:

My rather limited understanding of how playing commercial recordings on the
radio works is that the record companies ask the radio stations to play their
stuff, because it's good publicity for them.  I could be wrong about that,
though.

I think there's a classical station in New York that also does all its
broadcasts in streaming real audio.


#21 of 39 by scott on Wed Feb 24 11:45:07 1999:

There is a tangled web of relationships in who plays what and why.  "Payola"
is the (illegal) practice of record companies paying for radio play of their
product.  At various times it has been a widespread practice.  

Generally most radios stations now pay for "consultants" or "programming
services" to decide what to play.  DJs rarely get any control over music.


#22 of 39 by cyklone on Wed Feb 24 12:52:24 1999:

So now record companies pay promoters to convince the consultants and
programmers to play certain songs . . . . 



#23 of 39 by danr on Wed Feb 24 13:32:42 1999:

re #12: Maybe I need to rephrase my idea about an Internet radio station. 
Putting it on the Internet solely would certainly change the listener base, and
therefore, the station as a whole.  Maybe that's not a bad thing, though.  The
Grex membership and participation in the conferences is still mostly from Ann
Arbor, after all.


#24 of 39 by danr on Wed Feb 24 13:34:31 1999:

As for how pay for the music we play, I don't imagine that's a real big deal. 
Perhaps an email to Thayrone is in order.  He seems to play whatever he or his
audience wants without much thought to how he's going to pay for it.


#25 of 39 by krj on Wed Feb 24 14:17:33 1999:

   ((  Winter Agora #133  <--->  Music #181  ))


#26 of 39 by drewmike on Wed Feb 24 15:36:03 1999:

Thayrone works one floor above me. (One floor and a couple of cubicles over,
actually.)


#27 of 39 by cmcgee on Wed Feb 24 16:15:17 1999:

Record companies and radio stations are not the people who collect and pay
_performance_ royalties to artists.  That's BMI, ASCAP, SESAC (thanks
cyclone).  Radio stations have to have licensing agreements with _all_ those
groups, or face legal penalties for playing music they control.  (same for
bars, clubs, concert venues).  


#28 of 39 by polygon on Wed Feb 24 22:39:46 1999:

The most interesting example of a "community" (non-commercial, non-NPR) 
radio station that played classical music was WVCA in Gloucester, Mass. 
Gloucester is located on a peninsula called Cape Ann, and the call letters
stand for "the Voice of Cape Ann". 

The station was set up many years ago, back before FM radio frequencies in
metro areas were thought of as hot properties.  The owner, manager, and
sole on-air personality was an old curmudgeon who ran the station out of
his apartment, playing all kinds of classical music.  Sometimes, if he
didn't time it right, there was an interval of dead air when he ran to get
a roast out of the oven or use the bathroom.

I don't remember the curmudgeon's name, but in interviews he said he
*hated* Gloucester.  There's only two things you can do here, he said
gloomily, work or have sex; "I don't have a sex partner, so I work."

Some commercial radio group tried to get his license taken away, on the
ground that he didn't have news or weather or all the usual kinds of radio
blab.  The Gloucester community rallied in support of the curmudgeon, and
the FCC renewed WVCA's license.

However, about five or ten years ago, the old curmudgeon retired and sold
the thing, so it's presumably some random Boston-area FM station now.


#29 of 39 by orinoco on Thu Feb 25 22:08:27 1999:

(Is there any basis for taking someone's FCC license taken away because he
doesn't have news, weather, etc..., or were they just casting around for some
excuse to get rid of the guy?)


#30 of 39 by danr on Thu Feb 25 23:27:32 1999:

At one time, stations did have minimum requirements for news coverage. In the
last couple of years, they have either cut way back on those requirements or
eliminated them altogether.


#31 of 39 by wcross on Thu Feb 25 23:55:46 1999:

There are many, many rules...you must give out call letters and frequency
every so often (station identification).  You must run X number public
service announcements.  You must meet a bunch of financial requirements...

I know that a few years back, WQBR at EMU tried to get a full lic.  They
currently have a low wattage permit and a lic. to broadcast on the cable
run through the dorms.  The FCC is a serious group.  They needed at least
$200,000 per year for five years **before** they could apply to broadcast.
That applies to brand new lic. only.  An alum was going to donate the tower,
that was another $1 million or so (he got it cheep, but)...

Or you can broadcast with out FCC approval. It just can not reach more
than 1 sq. mile.



#32 of 39 by russ on Fri Feb 26 04:44:48 1999:

Re #31:  I believe you can transmit anything you want in the FM band,
as long as you aren't interfering with another service and you stay
below 100 milliwatts (that's one tenth of a watt) output power.
 
The law doesn't say "one mile".  It couldn't; the distance you can be
heard depends too much on the receiver and the terrain, so who could
say you were legal or not?  Measuring power is something you can define.
 
Doing a few quick numbers...  I seem to recall a received power of
something like -80 dBm (that's 80 dB below a milliwatt) to get a good
received signal.  Let's assume that's -70 dBm for a stereo FM signal.
If we assume that the receiver's antenna can get the energy from an
area a half-meter square, this means we need -64 dBm/m^2 wherever we
are.  Transmitted power can be up to +20 dBm, and the antenna probably
adds 3 dB in effective power (a doubling).  A fancy antenna would add
a lot more, but let's stick with that.  Our path loss allows us 87 dB
of dissipation, which allows the signal to cover a sphere of about
500 million square meters of area.  By A = 4 * pi * r^2, that sphere
has a radius of 6300 meters, or about 4 miles.  That's line-of-sight.
A good antenna which throws all your power at the horizon instead of
up or down could double that range; any kind of blockage between
could cut it by a factor of ten.  Four miles LOS seems reasonable.
 
So yeah, if you wanted to run your amateur classical station, and your
house was up on a hill, you could probably be heard over a big part
of Ann Arbor.  Just pick a locally vacant FM channel and go for it.
You could even transmit on different channels in different parts of
town, and get coverage all over.  Keeping several transmitters doing
the same thing at the same time could be fun; I suggest looking into
a bunch of Diamond Rio MP3 players and siting at friendly ISP's.


#33 of 39 by drewmike on Fri Feb 26 10:12:29 1999:

I've violated FCC regs. When I was at WJBK. Not prepared to go into 
details right now.


#34 of 39 by jazz on Fri Feb 26 17:01:58 1999:

        Bad Erik!  To the pit with you!


#35 of 39 by drewmike on Fri Feb 26 17:42:48 1999:

The long and the short of it: Whenever we got a piece of mail that made some
comment about programming or Channel 2's role in the community (events,
billboard advertising, whatever) I was supposed to send it upstairs to our
traffic department, so they could keep it in our Public file, per FCC regs.

One day, as I was shuffling through contest entries, I found a postcard that
said: "Hi. Please enter me in the 'Corrina, Corrina' drawing. I love Warren
Pierce--he's the best!"
 
And that, along with Channel 2's address, was all that was on the postcard.
No name. No address. Detroit postmark, which could have meant anything.
 
Well, anyway, I was so impressed by that card that I swiped it. It could have
been that one missing vote of confidence in Warren that could have kept him
from getting fired.


#36 of 39 by goose on Fri Mar 5 18:57:38 1999:

The FCC is considering adding a Low Power FM group of licences.
It is currently in the public comment portion of their rulemaking
process I belive.  Expect lots of opposition from the NAB (National
Association of Broadcasters)


#37 of 39 by krj on Tue Mar 28 05:30:22 2000:

Monday's New York Times reports that the broadcasting lobby has given up 
on the FCC in their fight against the FCC's proposal
to issue low-power broadcast licenses.  The broadcasters are now 
putting heavy pressure on Congress to pass legislation to kill the 
low-power station plan, and Congress seems to be caving.


#38 of 39 by goose on Tue Mar 28 21:07:20 2000:

<sigh>


#39 of 39 by diznave on Wed Mar 29 16:17:03 2000:

There are currently two LEGAL low power stations in Gainesville (under 100
watts..or maybe it's 1000...not exactly sure) each of which has been fighting
for a long time with the local FCC. This new measure was passed in the past
6 months. I remember hearing stories about a bust last summer with all of one
of the stations equipment taken or broken. There is a major dissatisfaction
with the radio in this area (me included). Especially after the shutdown of
97X, which, in my opinion was the best commercial radio station I've ever
heard. So, a vast number of the student population got behind the 'pirate'
stations...



There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: