Grex Music2 Conference

Item 126: Electric Guitars

Entered by krj on Mon Apr 27 19:36:14 1998:

This little essay comes from the Grex Jeopardy item in the Agora
conference, and it's relocated here with cyklone's permission.
The original "answer" was about the non-musician responsible for the 
sound of much contemporary music, or some phrasing like that, and 
the "question" was "who is Leo Fender?"
 
 -------

#86 of 86: by Cyklone (cyklone) on Fri, Apr 24, 1998 (08:51):
 McNally has got it. The other person to whom I was refering was Les Paul,
 but Les was also a chart-topping musician. Leo and Les defined the *sound*
 of popular music by perfecting electronic pick-ups for stringed
 instruments, thus permitting the widespread use of electric guitars and
 basses. Even many "acoustic"  musicians benefit from the Leo and Les,
 inasmuch as there are now electronic pick-ups for those instruments. 
 
 However, neither man invented the pick-up. Early jazz pioneers such as Charlie
 Christian were electrifying guitars in the big band era. The sound was
 extremely feeble though, and feedback was also a problem. Les Paul invented
 the "humbucking" (double-coil) pickup that was a quantum leap from existing
 technology. Les affiliated with the Gibson company, which eventually named
 one of its most popular guitars after him.
 
 Leo, who did not have the musical talent of Les, is best known for
 creating some of the most popular electric instruments of all time: the
 Stratocaster, the Telecaster, the Precision Bass and the Jazz Bass. Even
 now the pickup type/layout of those guitars is imitated by Fender's
 competitors, and virtually every electric guitarist/bassist has at some
 time owned or played one of these four instruments. Indeed, a review of
 the VH-1 list would reveal that the vast majority of those listed had a
 connection to Fender instruments. 
 
 In 1964, Fender sold his company to CBS, but stayed on. In the 80s (I
 think) he left to form another company called Music Man. He later left
 Music Man and formed his final company: G & L. Even his G & L instruments
 had a little "Designed by Leo Fender" logo to capitalize on his name. Leo
 died in 1990 or 91. When he died I ran out and bought a G & L bass, the
 SB-2, which IMNSHO was the epitome of Fender's idea of the electric bass.
 Flawless construction, built to close tolerances and using Precision and
 Jazz bass style pickups, it has only two knobs (volume for each pickup)
 and no active electronics. It is damn near perfect.
 
40 responses total.

#1 of 40 by cyklone on Mon Apr 27 23:23:46 1998:

As Senna pointed out after this entry, the design of the guitar under the
pickups was also quite important. In particular, the solid-body guitar was
also a very important development, as it permitted higher volumes without
feedback. Nevertheless, hollow- and semi-hollow electric guitars remained
popular for many, particularly blues and jazz players. And of course, many
musicians discovered the joys of making a solid-body guitar feed back as well.


#2 of 40 by lumen on Tue Apr 28 01:39:01 1998:

define IMNSHO?

active electronics?  They've built that into electric guitars?  (I am aware
that guitars have been MIDI implemented-- I think as an alternative to a
wah-wah pedal, somewhat.)

how does Muddy Waters fit into this?  I understand he started the fashion of
electric guitar in blues and is considered by some musicologists as the
granddaddy of rock n' roll.

Those not familiar with acoustic guitars should remember that pickups were
designed only for steel-stringed 'folk' (flat-top) acoustics.  Nylon stringed
'classical' guitars have not been electrified, as far as I know.  Makes me
wonder how classical guitars play solos with orchestral accompaniment (besides
having the orchestra fall silent when the soloist takes the melody again).

It would be nice to have a separate item for acoustic guitars, especially
classical and flamenco guitars, discussing pioneers such as Fernando Sor and
Andres Segovia, discussing the craftmanship of these instruments and makers
like Manning, Tekaki, etc. (which I'd like to find out), how these instruments
came to be played on the fingernails, etc., etc., etc.

I'd also like to hear more about 10-string and 12-string classical guitars.
(Yes, 10-stringed guitars do exist!)  There is also a little 10-stringed
Spanish guitar made from an armadillo shell, but I can't remember its name.

Ah...it's a charango!  (It's Bolivian/Peruvian, actually.  Did a little web
searching.  Heh.  Sorry-- I love Spanish/Latin American culture :) )

Sorry-- got on a tangent.  Keep talking; I'm listening.


#3 of 40 by cyklone on Tue Apr 28 02:15:54 1998:

By active electronics I am refering to battery operated preamps that are built
into guitars for volume boost and sometimes for EQ. As far as the putting a
pickup on a classical guitar, I believe that is possible, although mikes may
still be the more common method. The new pickups can be placed almost anywhere
on the vibrating portion of the instrument. They are called "contact" pickups.
And yes, as I understand it, Muddy Waters was one of the first to popularize
electric blues, and he was an influence on many early rockers (I don't know
what brand of guitar he used though).

In My Not So Humble Opinion refers to my twenty-five years as an electric
bassist (and dabbler in other instruments). I played my first paying gig
in my first year, and actually supported myself playing professionally one
summer (between semesters in grad school, ironically enough) I originally
started with Fender basses (still have my '65 Jazz Bass). In my jazz-rock
phase, I coveted all the newest and fanciest basses that had active
electronics, three pickups, body-length necks, etc. Then I came full
circle and realized that craftsmanship (including well-designed pickups)
were all I needed. FWIW, the G & L pickups on my current fave have managed
to combine phenomenal output (I can actually create noticable amp
distortion when they are turned up) with great frequency response. From
what I've been told, that is quite rare, as "hotter" pickups tend to have
a corresponding decrease in frequency response.



#4 of 40 by orinoco on Wed Apr 29 01:47:48 1998:

FWIW - electric-guitar-type pickups will not work on strings of any material
but steel.  The 'pickups' used on nylon-stringed guitars, violins, etc., pick
up the vibrations of the bridge or the body, not those of the strings.

Does anyone understand how MIDI guitars or guitar synthesizers work?


#5 of 40 by lumen on Wed Apr 29 03:30:48 1998:

FWIW?

the answer to #4 would likely be found in understanding the difference between
analog and digital synthesizers, and how acoustic pianos are patched into a
MIDI system.

Two possibilities, I suppose: 1) the guitar has a direct MIDI patch-- instead
of a plugging in an audio cable into a pickup, a MIDI cable (usually 5-pin
cable) is plugged into a MIDI port.  But that probably wouldn't work since
you'd have to make the guitar electronic.  2) the audio cable goes into a box
that converts the audio sound into MIDI signals.  Same principle when plugging
into a guitar synthesizer.

I don't rightly know, really-- I may have to visit a big city music store
again.  I've seen the synthesizers.


#6 of 40 by orinoco on Wed Apr 29 17:07:30 1998:

(FWIW = For What It's Worth)

Your option 1 wouldn't work - a MIDI signal isn't _sound_ at all, just a
series of "note on" and "note off" messages and so forth.  #2 sounds more
likely.



#7 of 40 by lumen on Wed Apr 29 23:56:39 1998:

I realized that after I wrote it :#)  Essentially, then, you don't need a
special guitar-- just a converter box.  Evidently, this is how you manipulate
tracks recorded from an acoustic piano by MIDI, too.


#8 of 40 by scott on Thu Apr 30 13:23:55 1998:

The tricky part is accurately sensing pitch, fast enough to give a decent
playing feel.  Once you have pitch and an attack, you can produce MIDI data
to run a synth.  That's what guitar-to-MIDI converters do.  Also, it would
be incredibly difficult to read chords, so most converters use a separate
pickup for each string.


#9 of 40 by goose on Fri May 22 19:26:10 1998:

There are pitch-to-MIDI converters that will work with any instrument.
You plug a mic into it, sing a note, or play a note and it will convert
it to MIDI data.  The limit here is *one note at a time* or one note
polyphony.  With "MIDI guitars" you have a separate pickup for each string
that is multiplexed into a pitch-toMIDI converter, so you can get up to 6 note
polyphony.  A piano that has been modified with a MIDI pickup system doesn't
use a pickup, but rather switches (note on/off) and sensors (note velocity,
etc) so the polyphony is 88 notes. 

There is nothing special about a modern "guitar synth" excepth that the
patches (sounds) are probably optimized for a guitar player and it has an
input for the 6 pickup device mentioned above.  A MIDI guitar is a guitar
outfitted with such a pickup.

Guitar synths of yesteryear (ARP Avatar cones to mind) used more basic
pitch detection so again chords were a problem.  The ouput was connected to
a synth with no keyboard.

"Classical" guitars or nylon/gut string guitars (the violin family too)
can use piezo pickups under the bridge or string saddle.  Actually these
pickups are available for most electrics too so you can get a pretty
convincing "acoustic" sound out of an electric.

Okay, I've written enough.


#10 of 40 by stonney on Tue Jul 21 08:06:55 1998:

I beleive Fender just put out one of the first MIDI ready guitars.  Rather
that having to install the extra picup and have wires dangling everywhere,
now the pickup is built in and it has both instument and MIDI outputs built
in too.
I think Leo Fender was distributing Music Man equipment(amplifiers
specifically) in the mid 70's.  I own a Music Man stack and something tells
me it's not from the 80's.  Also, Music Man amps are extremely similar to
Fender amps in elctronics, cosmetics and design.  They can be hard to tell
apart except for the name on the front.
Some intersting, although not recent info on pickups:
Lace Sensor pickups have seperate magnetic fields for each string.
Seymore Duncan has created humbucking pickups in a single coil width, for use
in strats and other single coil setups.  This is nice because your guitar
doesn't have to be modified to get the humbucking qualities on all pickup
configurations.
The first pickups were wound by hand where as most modern pickups are wound
by machine.  This is one of the reasons why some older guitars have a
characteristic sound that even a same year, exact model guitar can't
replicate.  When the pickups were wound by hand, some workers would put too
many or too few windings on the pickups, or they would do a quick and sloppy
job.  This resulted in some great sounding pickups, or at least many of the
same pickup, none of which sounded exactly the same.


#11 of 40 by scott on Tue Jul 21 10:50:23 1998:

A few minor nits.... ;)

I think either Yamaha or Casio made the first MIDI guitar, back a few years.
It also had built in sounds.

Music Man was Leo Fender's next company after selling Fender to CBS.  The
amps are sort of similar, but had solid state preamps with tube output
sections.  

Lace Sensor pickups have something like 22 little magnetic fields.  Normal
pickups have one field for each string.


#12 of 40 by goose on Tue Jul 21 18:02:16 1998:

Fender's Strat with built in Roland hex pickups has been around for about
three years now.  


#13 of 40 by orinoco on Sat Aug 8 03:28:31 1998:

What is the advantage of more than one magnetic field per string?


#14 of 40 by scott on Sat Aug 8 11:47:20 1998:

Smoother (more even) coverage, perhaps when you bend a string to one side or
another.  Some pickups solve this with one huge magnetic field, formed by a
continuous strip of metal as the source.  Lace Sensors do the opposite,
breaking up the field into many small bits with overlap.

My own guitar with Lace Sensors has a very clean, evenly balanced sound, with
plenty of bass.  I like a bit more character, though, so I usually have single
coil pickups in the guitar.  These have a bit more dynamics, at the expense
of not being as evenly balanced.


#15 of 40 by goose on Sat Aug 8 15:04:24 1998:

RE#13 -- It's so each string can be analyzed individually, and converted into
MIDI data.  With a conventional pickup that has only one output, you can
only play single note lines into a pitch-midi converter, chords would make
it go nuts.


#16 of 40 by orinoco on Sat Aug 8 15:45:21 1998:

Okay, that makes sense. Thanks.


#17 of 40 by senna on Thu Aug 13 15:46:31 1998:

It's surprising what you can make a guitar do.  Watching and listening to
people like Adam Jones and Tom Morello (who, incidently, used to play
together) do things with their guitars is magic.  Midi allows more direct
manipulation, but what you can get out of the effects boxes is astounding.

I'm pleasantly surprised with how nice the tone on my relatively cheap
electric is... great deep end, particularly.  Unfortunately, my tunings have
screwed up the electronics something fierce, but oh well.

Hmm.  this is a late response.


#18 of 40 by scott on Thu Aug 13 22:32:13 1998:

Cheap guitars are often really good sounding, in one particular style or
another.  There's my old Teisco Del Rey, for instance, which has a presence
my Strat still can't match...


#19 of 40 by senna on Mon Aug 17 16:17:34 1998:

Teisco Del Rey?  Any relation to the book publisher? :)  That a solid body?


#20 of 40 by scott on Mon Aug 17 19:42:48 1998:

That guy who calls himself "Teisco Del Rey" stole the name from the line of
guitars.  "Tokyo Electric Instrument and Sound Company" is where "Teisco"
comes from.  They made masses of guitars, they were the Huffy of guitars. 
They made several lines of their own, plus the Sears Silvertone line...


#21 of 40 by cyklone on Mon Aug 17 23:17:02 1998:

Nice to see my "Grex Jeopardy" item has lived on and generated some
intelligent discussion. I haven't had much time go on-line, but I'll try
to look in more often . . .


#22 of 40 by goose on Tue Aug 18 22:28:11 1998:

Teisco died recently too, I think.


#23 of 40 by senna on Wed Aug 19 14:37:33 1998:

Sears had a guitar line?  That's kinda sad.

It's nice to see guitars not named fender or gibson thriving, because some
marketplaces are a lot more monopolized than electric guitars.  Paul Reed
Smith is one of the highest quality makes available, and I'd own one if I
could afford the bloody thing :)  Korn is doing weird stuff with Ibanez
again...


#24 of 40 by scott on Wed Aug 19 16:55:30 1998:

PRS (Paul Reed Smith) guitars are a big hit with the "guitar as 
investment" crowd.  I just recall the short-lived line of PRS basses 
that were beautific but didn't sound very good.

The Sears Silvertone line, along with makes like Montgomery Wards 
Airline line, are semi-famous in the history of rock'n'roll from all the 
famous players who started as dirt-poor kids with a guitar from Sears 
and the like.  Sears had a cool combo where a small guitar amp was built 
into the guitar case... Boss Guitars has a couple on display.


#25 of 40 by senna on Thu Aug 20 04:54:50 1998:

Sounds fascinating.  I really like the tones I hear from Paul Reed Smith
players, but alas I can afford neither a PRS nor a top of the line Les Paul
that would be it's top competitor.  Just because you make good guitars doesn't
guarantee that your basses will be good,  though.. brand equity concerns would
seem to dictacte that guitar companies actually put work into them.


#26 of 40 by scott on Thu Aug 20 10:56:32 1998:

Well, there's much more to making good instruments than just using exotic
woods and the most expensive components.  Even more so in basses.

The most interesting recent "classic guitar reissue" is not a Fender or
Gibson, but a Danelectro!  Those were the cheap semi-hollowbody guitars made
with Masonite bodies and pickups inside lipstick tubes which were often used
in surf music.  The newly-reformed (or formed) Danelectro company has reissued
an old classic, and it lists for about $300.  Gibsons and Fenders are nice,
but you really *pay* for the name.


#27 of 40 by senna on Fri Aug 21 14:22:03 1998:

That sounds about right with what else Danelectro is putting out... and they
put out some quality stuff, for good prices.  I've been meaning to get that
trio of stomp boxes they put out.

Often, buying a guitar for a lot cheaper only skims the quality you're getting
by a little bit.  Those $500 Les Pauls aren't all that inferior to their $2500
cousins, and there's a lot someone like me who likes to play with the amp and
the tuning knobs can do to keep you from noticing.  

I'd be actively interested in the Danelectro re-issue if it wasn't a
hollow-body... I need something solid.  Actually, what I need to is to fix
my electronics, still.  The signal loss has become ridiculous.


#28 of 40 by scott on Fri Aug 21 17:03:09 1998:

The Dano reissue is a "semi-hollow" body.  No holes on the front, but some
cavities in the interior.

BTW, there are now *5* stomp boxes... they added a tuner and an echo.


#29 of 40 by happyboy on Fri Aug 21 22:06:49 1998:

i've got an mpg. file of the Majic Band (beeheart ...early 70's) and the
bassist is playing what appears to be a danelectro bass...the quality of the
vid is poor so i cant really tell...anybody ever seen one of those?


#30 of 40 by senna on Sat Aug 22 17:51:18 1998:

Really?  Do you know how good they are?


#31 of 40 by happyboy on Sat Aug 22 23:17:03 1998:

the audio is pretty crappy too...but the bass sounds pretty thunky & dead,
perhaps on purpose...hold on a sec...weerd, i hadn't checked out the file in
over a year...it is a danelectro (i'm pretty sure) double-neck with the bass
neck being what looks like a 3/4 scale and the guitar neck a simple
six-string.
again the audio is choppy.


#32 of 40 by scott on Sun Aug 23 19:28:22 1998:

One of the bands at Top of the Park appeared to have a Danelectro bass guitar.

Senna, if I were you I'd buy one of the Japanese-made Fender guitars.  The
quality is pretty good, and the low price/low quality is concentrated in
components like pickups and tuners that you can replace later with better
stuff.


#33 of 40 by happyboy on Sun Aug 23 21:27:01 1998:

i don't know what's around detroit/a2 but i'd definitely pop up
to elderly in lansing before i bought anything.


#34 of 40 by scott on Sun Aug 23 22:51:05 1998:

Yeah, but even locally Nalli and Music-go-round have OK deals on new stuff.
And the low end of new guitars is *really* good these days; mass production
coupled with much-improved QC means that $300 guitars are much better than
they used to be.  Elderly Instruments in Lansing is a cool store, but I'd be
more likely to go there if I was looking for acoustic vs. electric.  And it's
starting to happen that you can even get a better deal on a cheap new guitar
with decent quality vs. used stuff.

If I was looking for a good starter electric guitar, I'd look either at the
Fender line that is a step above the "Squier" line, or (if'n I liked Gibsons)
at the Epiphone stuff.
The "real" Gibsons right now are priced at ridiculous levels, and the
American-made Fenders are rather expensive for quality that isn't much greater
than the cheap lines.

Right now even the cheap guitars being built are better than the "real" (brand
name, Fender/Gibson) guitars that were built in the 70's and 80's.  Well, in
general.  I sure wouldn't pay much for a 70's or 80's used instrument, unless
it was something really special.


#35 of 40 by senna on Mon Aug 24 00:22:38 1998:

I've noticed that Music-Go-Round is turning into quite a good place to pick
up guitar and bass gear.  It's usually a bit cheaper than, say, Herb David,
and depending on what you're looking for the selection may be better, too.
Plus, they get a lot of good "factory outlet" type guitars that have minor
cosmetic defects but can't be sold at full price.

What I need now is an amp...


#36 of 40 by isis on Tue Aug 25 18:25:26 1998:

Has anyone been to Guitar Center in Roseville?  They have a great selection
of not only guitars, basses, but also keyboards and such.


#37 of 40 by senna on Wed Aug 26 03:29:21 1998:

Roseville?  Long walk.  Also, I don't really need keyboards :)


#38 of 40 by goose on Mon Sep 21 18:07:17 1998:

Someone mentioned Danelectro back there....A compnay purchased the Danalectro
name a while back and is now making some effect pedals branded Danelectro,
plus they are now makeing a very nice remake of the old Danny model U-2
for around $300.


#39 of 40 by scott on Mon Sep 21 20:28:40 1998:

Yeah, that's what we were talking about, the reissue company.


#40 of 40 by goose on Wed Sep 23 01:36:42 1998:

Ooops, that's what I get for skimming...;-)


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: