35 new of 78 responses total.
So any other stupid tricks you have done were planned far in advance?
I'm not interested in naftee joining me as a FW of the language conference. He has not been an active, much less valuable, participant in the conference. He has also shown that he likes to enter junk responses in other conferences and has the skills to multiply this in conferences in which he has the powers of a FW. There are dozens of inactive conferences, many I think even with FWs that are not current users. I'd suggest turning one of those over to naftee, and he can show us what he can do as a FW.
The langauge conference, thanks to you, rcurl, is one of those sadly inactive conferences. Getting defensive isn't going to change that fact. Welcoming help, however, will.
I'd welcome a co FW if it were a user I could trust not to do infantile or stupid things.
rcurl, you are being replaced. Live with it. You ruined the language conference. I'm here to fiz your mistakes.
fix
As a user of language: No, you aren't, naftee. I see no reason to make you a fairwitness of this conference.
Right, Grex certainly doesn't need new staff members.
Fair witnesses are not staff members.
They're semistaff members. Right. Grex certainly doesn't need to encourage active users.
Some active users need encouragement. Some are just a plague.
re 50 I've given you almost a dozen reasons for why I should be a fairwitness of the language conference. Care to give me any reasons why I should not be one?
Yes: #46 and #48.
He was just being silly, gelinas. Couldn't you tell by his language?
And how is that different from everything else he (or is it you, under a different login-id? I've never yet figured that out) has entered here?
What's wrong with entering silly stuff?
Nothing, as an occasional change of pace. But when it is all (or even almost all) someone enters, the resulting impression is . . . silliness, unrelieved silliness.
Your age is showing, gelinas.
As is yours.
In any case, it's not a strong qualification for FWing.
It's almost funny how gelinas is using willcome's opinions of my actions as the truth.
re resp:64: Yeah, it's strange how people view things when two loginids always agree with one another; when one of them usually comes along and says "Me, too" when the other one says anything at all; and when they cite one another as possessing positive characteristics that no one else seems to have perceived. It's really weird how, when two loginids seem identical, others may come to think they have something in common. Fortunately, willcome, by jumping on such assumptions and disputing them, you can always correct people's impressions and make sure they treat you as two separate people. Keep trying, some of us are pretty slow and have to be told as many as dozens of times before we'll properly understand what you're saying on a subject such as this one.
This response has been erased.
This response has been erased.
willcome's polytarp. As is dah, and plongeur. naftee's asd.
re 65 > when two loginids always agree with one another; Patently false. >when one of them usually comes along and > says "Me, too" when the other one says anything at all; Mmhuh? > when they > cite one another as possessing positive characteristics that no one > else seems to have perceived. Some people percieve them, others don't. >when two loginids seem identical, Seem identical to whom? Since you're responding for gelinas, we may as well say that jep and gelinas are the same person. You seem identical enough. > others may come to think they have something in common. Maybe two people have some things in common, but clearly they are not the same persons. Your post has done more to show the differences between myself and willcome than to show how we are the same. Or perhaps its purpose was to show how old persons' faculties slow down over time.
If naftee really wants what is best for the lang conference, he can do what other people have already said re: give his ideas to the existing FW to try out. If naftee absolutely must *be* a FW before knowing what those ideas are, I agree with what rcurl said in #45 - go learn as the FW of a conference no one cares if it gets "broken".
Heh. You're not going to offend me by confusing me with gelinas, but Joe might take it badly.
I don't participate on M-Net. It is entirely possible that the polytarp and naftee personas are differentiated on that system. They have not been well-differentiated here. #69 is the first response I've noticed that offers some evidence of different people. Saying "I'm not polytarp" is NOT evidence, by the way; it is merely an claim.
re 71 No, I'm actually quite capable of differentiating between two seperate users, unlike some other users around here. Funny, it seems like some of those "other users" are staff members. You'd think a staff member would know how to tell if indeed there is only one user using two loginids. re 70 What happens when you attempt to give your ideas to a FW of a conference who a) has let it become inactive and therefore doesn't give a shit about it and b) is prejudiced towards the giver of ideas? No, that FW must certainly be replaced.
No, you are certainly wrong.
Believe it, it's true.
"I know you are, but what am I?"
TROGG IS DAVID BLAINE
hey guys; i still wouldn't mind doing this.
You have several choices: