Grex Kitchen Conference

Item 201: Pots & Pans Item

Entered by i on Wed Dec 4 12:20:59 2002:

44 new of 59 responses total.


#16 of 59 by i on Mon Dec 9 04:37:04 2002:

Re:  various
Currently, i don't do sauces much.  But i'm pretty open to "make something
in 5 minutes from the gunk you'd have to clean out of the roast pan anyway"
ideas.  

The number of folks talking about stainless steel sauciers working well
with wisks (s^3w^4:) makes me doubtful about a non-stick saucier holding
up.

My cast iron works pans work for most things, but they do have the sharp
side-meets-bottom angle; the rounded saucier would be better for some
things.  (But i'm now wondering if better than a non-stick rounded fry
pan or not.)


#17 of 59 by mary on Mon Dec 9 22:22:32 2002:

I'd not buy a set of any brand of pan but instead look at what it needs to
do.  My collection doesn't match but it works really well for a wide range
of dishes. 

I have one large heavy non-stick frying pan with a surface I need to
nurture.  Only plastic or wooden utensils are used, it gets a hand
washing, and it can't take oven use.  But cleanup is a snap.  I have a
slightly smaller (10")  stainless All-Clad that's perfect for items that
need to develop a good seared surface or maybe where you get it started on
the stovetop and finished in a hot oven.  Non-stick can't do that.  Our
small 7" frying pan is non-stick yet dishwasher safe and takes fairly
harsh treatment. It's a little workhorse.  I looked for a long time
before finding such a beauty (Analon).

The saucier really isn't much different from your standard saucepan but if
you're planning to do much whisking or cooking thick liquids I'd really
suggest you take a look at it.  The subtle difference helps.  I wouldn't
even think of non-stick here but then I'm a big whisk fan.  I think the
saucier's shape means it has a little more surface area too, which helps
when reducing sauces.  But that's not something I do often enough to worry
about. 

I like a big non-stick stockpot for chili and soups, where you don't need
to brown but I sure don't want anything to start burning on the bottom. 
Until about a year ago I had a nice heavy enamel coated Dutch oven but
after 30 years the coating gave out and I went to non-stick here too. 
It's easier to clean, for sure, but I do miss the ability to sear that the
iron had. 

Overall I have a mix of Circulon, Look, Calphalon, Analon, Bernedes,
All-Clad, old Farberware and La Creuset.

That's more than anyone wants to know about my kitchen cabinets but I was
on a roll.  My advice to anyone out there just getting started?  Don't buy
sets. 



#18 of 59 by i on Tue Dec 10 12:45:34 2002:

My collection is modest, and i've bought sets...

I started with a $80 set that Consumer Reports really liked (not that i
always agree with them) - very thin & light stainless steel with good
Al bottom disks to spread heat - 1/2/3 qt. saucepans, 5 qt. dutch oven,
12" deep frypan, & 3 pieces of "stainless steel bottom tupperwear".  I
hardly ever use a couple of the pieces, but i'm way ahead price-wise
anyway, they nest nicely for storage, and they're nice pans.

I bought a set of 3 cast-iron fry pans (6.25", 8", & 10.5").  Again, a
bit more than needed, but really cheap and they nest.  Plus a 2 qt. cast
iron "mini-dutch-oven" pot w/lid.  Used properly, the cast iron is non-
stick (and damage to the non-stick surface is easy & free to fix).  It
has no problem getting pass-me-the-welding-glove hot to sear meat, and
holds heat wonderfully.

Oops - for pasta, i've got a cheapo enamel-over-THIN-metal giant-tin-can-
shaped pot with lid, hole-ridden pasta insert, & 3-leg colander. 

I've also got a couple couple-bucks-at-a-garage-sale thick cast aluminum
pots - 1 qt. saucepan & large dutch oven - as seldom-used extras. 

Amusing note:  CR's top-rated pot set (Dec02 issue) costs about 4 times
what i spend on all mine together, and they aren't dishwasher safe (all
mine are, ditto oven). 


#19 of 59 by mary on Tue Dec 10 14:11:20 2002:

I bow in reverence to anyone who can make those black iron
pans work well.  I don't have the patience to take care
of 'em.  I know, I know, once you get them seasoned they
don't need much, but, the couple of times I've tried I've
not been able to get over the looks-dirty-but-I-shouldn't-
scrub-it hump.

For the most part, if it can't take the dishwasher it 
doesn't join the fleet.

The oldest pans I have, which are doing yeoman service,
are Farberware saucepans, 1 and 2 quart sizes.  I got 'em
as starter wedding gifts.


#20 of 59 by mary on Tue Dec 10 14:11:58 2002:

Back in 1975.


#21 of 59 by cmcgee on Tue Dec 10 16:24:23 2002:

My main pot collection is a set of stainless steel-clad iron bottome and
part-way up the sides that my mom gave me when I went off to college.  They
are idendtical to the one sshe had used for 15 years at that point.

Ihave 4 sizes of pots, one of which has a double boiler and a steamer
insert that also goes in the oven as a casserole. Two copies of the
smallest 3/4 qt pot. Big couple gallon dutch oven, 3 sizes of frying pans,
all of them with specially designed lids that hold in the steam, but let
it burble away in spurts.  Nearly waterless cooking can be done with a low
flame.  I'll think of the manufactureer in a minute.

Set augmented by aforementioned 2 Cup sauce pot, three sizes of cast iron
skillets, which see far more use than the stainless ones, a 1qt cast iron
dutch oven, and a big couple gallon one.  These are actually pot, not
legged-dutch ovens.  A heavy steel wok, and a crepe pan finish up the
top-of-stove collection.

Actually I have a bunch of pyroceramic casseroles too, but I don't usually
reach for them unless I'm going to finish something in the oven.



#22 of 59 by scott on Tue Dec 10 17:45:17 2002:

I bought one of those Visions sets of glass pots and pans way back when I got
my first apartment - the saucepans are great for some things, but I haven't
used the skillet in years since it is practically worthless (extremely uneven
heat transfer).  Instead, I have a cheap teflon skillet which gets most of
the use, and a cast iron skillet which gets used for a few things like meat.
I've also got a pair of the classic stainless Farberware saucepans which see
a fair bit of use.


#23 of 59 by glenda on Tue Dec 10 18:41:05 2002:

Re #21" Echoware, I have the same set.


#24 of 59 by keesan on Tue Dec 10 19:59:12 2002:

Jim discovered when he bought a set of stainless pots and pans from Sears that
the big pot and big frying pan used the same cover, ditto for the small pan
and pot, so he could not use them both at the same time without having to
acquire more lids first.


#25 of 59 by slynne on Tue Dec 10 21:25:49 2002:

I used to have some of those Visions glass pots. I loved them except 
for one thing. They break if you drop them! I dont have them anymore :(

You guys sure have a lot of pots. I have 2 sauce pans and some cast 
iron frying pans (that used to belong to my mother's brother. He bought 
them in the early 1960's and they are still good! I had to reseason 
them though). Oh yeah, I have some stainless steel stock pots for 
making soup but I never get around to it so they have been gathering 
dust for over 2 years. 


#26 of 59 by scott on Wed Dec 11 04:34:10 2002:

Those big stock pots are great for brewing beer!  ;)

I haven't managed to break any of my Visions pots, although I did chip one
of the lids (replaced for $0.80 at a thrift store).  And the lid from the big
pot & skillet (that shared thing Keesan brought up) fits my cast iron skillet
nicely.


#27 of 59 by i on Wed Dec 11 11:38:33 2002:

Re: #19
I ignore most of the "treat it like thousand-year-old lace" rules on cast
iron.  I wash 'em with dish detergent & a nylon scrub brush and use metal
utensils fairly often in cooking.  If the coating looks a bit thin, almost
no time is needed to stick a thumb in some oil & rub it around (don't try
for more than just wetting the surface).  Just-one-slip-and-the-damage-is-
permanent (to a far more expensive pan) Teflon sounds worse to me.

I don't have a dishwasher (where cast iron shouldn't go), but a few quick
swirls with a soapy brush, rinse, & dry with a hot burner or oven doesn't
take enough time that it matters.


#28 of 59 by keesan on Wed Dec 11 17:09:16 2002:

If there is a bit of rust it is good for you anyway (iron).


#29 of 59 by slynne on Wed Dec 11 22:38:59 2002:

re#29 Hahaha. Maybe someday I will try that. 

yeah, I dont find it too difficult to take care of the cast iron. I 
wash it with soap sometimes if it needs it. I just make sure it is 
rinsed well and then I make sure it is dry before I put it away. I 
never soak it. 


#30 of 59 by i on Wed Dec 11 22:45:29 2002:

I don't soak it (i don't recall that it ever needed soaking anyway)
but do sometimes leave semi-liquid foods in cast iron for several
days in the fridge - another supposed no-no.


#31 of 59 by gelinas on Sun Dec 15 06:44:46 2002:

I've one cast-iron skillet; it may have belonged to my grandmother before my
mother gave it to me.  (I'm fairly certain several of her skillets, which now
belong to my brother, belonged to her mother (our grandmother).)  We also have
one set of Revereware, purchased when we moved here in '87.  (Now I wonder
what happened to the stuff we had before?  Maybe it's boxed up somewhere.)
We also have a set of enamel pots and some Corningware casseroles.

I used to use the skillet _only_ for corn bread, but lately I've been cooking
eggs in it, which works better than cooking them in the stainless steel
skillet.


#32 of 59 by cmcgee on Sun Dec 15 10:31:33 2002:

The pans were Eckoware, Flint, or Flintware:  "Stainless steel with
radiant heat core". 



#33 of 59 by mta on Tue Apr 29 20:39:50 2003:

This item is pretty old, but I am now in the market to replace my cast iron
skillets, which I love, because the extra iron is supposed to be very bad for
men.

I don';t want to bother with the "cheap stuff" -- I want to slowly collect
a set that can be passed on to my grandkids after yoemens duty in my kitchen.

I have one large, flimsy stainless steel pan that burns anythign and
everything to replacde and one small omelet pan that has a stainless outside
and a heavy core of some sort.  It was outrageously expensive...$50 for the
omelket pan, lots more for the larger sized pan, but it works beautifully.
I'll atick with that brand if I can't find anything as good at a lower price.

But I wonderd which skillets you have that have lasted for years, don't burn
and stick, and you would replace them witht he same thing if you ahd to do
it over again...


#34 of 59 by slynne on Tue Apr 29 21:14:52 2003:

I dont know about skillets but I bought an All-Clad sauce pan last year 
and it is *wonderful*. I imagine that their skillets would be pretty 
nice. 


#35 of 59 by mary on Tue Apr 29 23:11:17 2003:

For omelets I'd most certainly get a non-stick surface, that didn't cost a
whole lot, that I'd simply plan to replace ever two years.  I don't do
high maintenance, hand wash only pans.  Non-stick, no matter how much you
pay for it, has to be treated to gentle soap and hand washing if you want
it to last.  For that reason I'd never go All-Clad non-stick. 

When you don't need non-stick or even want to brown items, All-Clad can't
be beat.  Your grandchildren will love it for those very rare times they
take a sentimental journey and prepare a homemade meal. 

Have I mentioned lately how much I enjoy my 3 quart saucier? ;-)

But what's the deal with iron residue and men's health?  


#36 of 59 by jaklumen on Wed Apr 30 00:18:03 2003:

It is time to replace our pressure cooker pot.  *sigh*  It is missing 
the rubber pressure release stem.


#37 of 59 by keesan on Wed Apr 30 01:30:36 2003:

You can replace the missing piece - they sell replacements in the same kit
as the rubber gasket.  Might be as much as $8 and if your local hardware store
does not have any, try the company's website (also a bit cheaper).

Men who eat animals can accumulate too much iron.  Plant iron is not absorbed
if not needed.  I doubt that frying in cast iron will add much iron.  Boiling
acidic liquids might.  Women after menopause who eat animals will have the
same problem if they eat too much animal.


#38 of 59 by i on Wed Apr 30 01:36:16 2003:

Re: #36
The stores i've seen pressure cookers in also carry spare parts.

Re: #33
I'd be tempted to get a false I.D. & give blood twice as often as
allowed before giving up my cast iron cookware.  But my impression
from Consumer Reports is that you'd have to cook a LOT of acidic
foods in (well-seasoned) cast iron for your body to actually absorb
much iron from the pans. 

If you are going to tearfully pack your cast iron away in your
treasure chest, tell us what features you seek in the replacements.
Non-stick?  Dishwasher safe?  Oven safe to moderate temps?  Oven
safe to high temps?  Just some skillets, or other shapes?  Lids?
Don't-get-hot handles?


#39 of 59 by scott on Wed Apr 30 02:03:40 2003:

Ditto what Mary said - get a $12 teflon pan from the grocery store.  Those
things are pretty good these days, and I've been using the same cheapy for
probably 8 years now.


#40 of 59 by jaklumen on Thu May 1 02:22:43 2003:

resp:37 about $8, actually.  We might have chanced trying to find it 
in a thrift store, but we went straight to the Presto site.


#41 of 59 by mta on Wed Jan 7 22:47:08 2004:

I'm sorry I never got back to answer this.  We decided to go with all-Clad,
and then more research suggested that the iron from cast iron was so poorly
absorbed that it wasn't likely to be a problem.  (It seems the rumour may have
been started by the aluminum industryt, so I unpacked my beloevd cast iron.


#42 of 59 by eeyore on Sun Feb 15 04:15:11 2004:

Get the All-Clad anyway.  It just rocks. :)

I have mostly Aluminum-disk bottom Revere, although I do own a small
All-Clad frypan that I adore.  I own very little non-stick, since I hate the
stuff, but I do have a small and a large frypan.  I'm going to eventually
replace some to all of it with the All Clad, a mix of the plain stainless
and the Copper Core.

Want a good drool?  The copper core AC has copper sandwiched between 2
layers of stainless, not just on the bottom, but all the way up the sides.
Expensive as hell, but well worth it.

Also, my favorite frypan is probably 30 years old.  It's a 12" Corningware
frypan with aluminum clad bottom.  Aww yeah!


#43 of 59 by mary on Sun Feb 15 12:54:15 2004:

Meg!  Cool to see you back.  Are you at WS at Briarwood?
If so, I'll be stopping in there later today for something.
Maybe see you then.


#44 of 59 by eeyore on Sun Feb 15 14:29:14 2004:

Actually, I'm working at the one in Somerset, as I now live in Royal Oak. 
Just mostly on Tuesdays, to do shipment.  It's a little extra cash, and a
nice discount, so it's all worth it. :)


#45 of 59 by eprom on Sun Aug 1 00:35:39 2004:

My roommate used my electric hand mixer in my stainless steel pot 
as a frickin' mixing bowl to make brownies. Now it has a billion
circular scratches on the bottom. I know it's not teflon or ultra
expensive cladware and is mostly cosmetic, but this pisses me the 
!@#$!@ off!  Am I being unreasonable here?


#46 of 59 by twenex on Sun Aug 1 02:11:35 2004:

No. People can do what they like with their own stuff, but they really should
be extra-extra careful with other people's. If they're naturally careless,
they should be extra-extra-extra careful.


#47 of 59 by mary on Sun Aug 1 12:00:55 2004:

Stainless steel pans are supposed to see signs of use.  Unlike non-stick,
it's a sign they are used by a real cook (who would mostly avoid non-stick
to begin with).  Maybe it's just a "car" thing, that the first ding is
the worst.  Over the next 20 years that pan will take on a patina.  My
advice, don't worry about it, instead, feel easier about taking it out
for some real cooking.


#48 of 59 by slynne on Sun Aug 1 20:52:44 2004:

I once had a roommate who bought a cast iron frying pan and then got 
all uptight about it. He actually made up a list of rules for the 
frying pan and posted them in the kitchen. But, of course, as twenex 
mentions in resp:46, this is perfectly ok since it was his frying pan. 
The rules also made it very clear to us what acceptable uses of the 
frying pan would be so there was no confusion

My response was to go out and get the exact same pan. I used to take 
great pleasure in washing it in the sink with extra soap and a brillo 
pad because I know that it bothered my roommate a LOT. But in a good 
way. I dont think it *really* bothered him but he made a great show of 
pretending it bothered him because that would encourage me to continue 
to abuse my own frying pan while leaving his alone ;)

Anyhow, the way I see it is this. If you want to be uptight about your 
pot, make up a list of rules for the pot. Dont expect you roommate to 
just know that small scratches on the bottom would bother you. It isnt 
unreasonable that the scratches would bother you but since that 
probably isnt something that would bother most folks, it is 
unreasonable to expect your roommate to know that it would bother you.

Of course, mary's advice in resp:47 is good too. You'll probably be a 
lot happier if you dont get bent out of shape because a pot gets bent 
out of shape ;)


#49 of 59 by twenex on Sun Aug 1 22:33:36 2004:

I advocated proper respect for other people's property, not Fascist control
of ephemera, like your friend!


#50 of 59 by scott on Sun Aug 1 23:58:51 2004:

Re 48:  Finish the story!  Which cast-iron pan ended up in better shape????


#51 of 59 by slynne on Wed Aug 4 20:18:18 2004:

resp:50 - Ok. *His* cast-iron frying pan ended up in better shape but I 
just re-seasoned mine occasionally and it was just fine. Guess what is 
one of the nice things about cast iron frying pans? Even a bozo like me 
cant ruin them! I eventually gave that pan away though because my 
grandmother gave me a whole set of them that used to belong to her son 
who died before I was born. It makes her happy to know that someone is 
using them. And guess what. Even those these pans are like 75 years 
old, I still cant ruin them.


#52 of 59 by slynne on Wed Aug 4 20:35:13 2004:

Ok, the cast iron pans are only 40 years old. I have caught myself 
embellishing again ;)


#53 of 59 by dtk on Wed Dec 25 21:05:03 2013:

The combination of a well seasoned black iron pan and a silicone
spatula/turner and a stainless tong enables a lot of recipes, and can go from
searing to baking to sauteeing to boiling/poaching to braising to fridge. 




#54 of 59 by keesan on Thu Dec 26 03:47:18 2013:

A neighbor just gave us a brand new never used in the wrapping electric fry
pan.  Aluminum.  It sticks far less than the old scratched up one that was
no longer fixable.  


#55 of 59 by denise on Fri Jan 17 03:26:23 2014:

I used to have a well seasoned round deep dish pizza pan that I loved
but don't know what happened to it. So it'd be nice to get some kind if
iron pan...


#56 of 59 by mary on Fri Jan 17 14:36:53 2014:

Over the last 40 years I've acquired a nice assortment of high quality pots 
and pans, but my favorite is a 10" Lodge cast iron skillet that is naturally 
non-stick at this point.  Cost new, today, is about $20. 


#57 of 59 by denise on Sun Jan 19 04:24:25 2014:

It's been a lot of years since I've looked at pots and pans in the
stores   so I have no idea what the higher quality stuff costs. 

I assume they make cast iron pans that are more like sauce pans or dutch
 ovens than the more traditional cast iron frying pan? If they do make 
bigger pans, how would the cast iron affect what you're cooking?


#58 of 59 by mary on Sun Jan 19 17:28:06 2014:

I have an enameled cast iron Dutch oven that's probably 25 years old.  That 
pot has seen a lot of stew, soup and chili over the years.  I even use it to 
make 24 hour no-knead bread.  But I'm not so sure it would do what a saucepan 
needs to do, which is make a quick adjustment to flame adjustments.  I prefer 
multi-ply with a stainless exterior for saucepans. But all of this comes down 
to personal preference.  I'm not a matched set kind of cook.  What serves to 
fry and egg would be terrible at searing steaks at nuclear temperatures.


#59 of 59 by denise on Mon Jan 20 01:48:31 2014:

I do have a couple sauce pans that I use for basic heat-up type things. 
And one bigger basic pot I use for chili, stew, and soup. Am just 
wondering if a cast iron dutch oven type thing would work better. I do 
use a slow cooker for some things but it never produces a good stew nor 
do I use it for chili.

I also have some basic non-stick frying pans in a few sizes and one
grill  pan [one of those non-stick square frying pans with the raised
lines that  provide the 'grill' marks.

And now that I live at a place that doesn't ban outdoor grills, I do
plan  on eventually getting a grill, once I can save up the money for a
decent  one.


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: