Grex Helpers Conference

Item 74: System Problems

Entered by valerie on Wed Sep 23 21:25:10 1998:

147 new of 181 responses total.


#35 of 181 by albaugh on Wed Oct 7 18:03:55 1998:

Just now when I tried to connect to cyberspace.org as I always do, it looks
like "the DNS" complained that it didn't know that host.  grex.cyberspace.org
worked...


#36 of 181 by hhsrat on Thu Oct 8 00:47:10 1998:

Re: 25

My telnet software won't work over my family's proxy server.  I have no 
modem in my computer because it uses an IRQ which I can't afford to 
spare if I want the sound card and the Ethernet card to work.

Maybe I'll just give in to my PC-ness and buy an IMAC


#37 of 181 by twokewl on Thu Oct 8 01:58:01 1998:

WHen isn't M-nut down?



#38 of 181 by eeyore on Thu Oct 8 04:05:06 1998:

I use LotusWorks, but I don't think that my windows terminal program is any
better, and neither is my alphaworks program.  (I gotta check that one...I
haven't used it in forever)


#39 of 181 by senna on Thu Oct 8 12:57:56 1998:

A lot.  Take now, for instance.  And their period of inactivity I was
referring to was the conclusion of a new record of up time for them, over 56
days if I recall the statistics correctly.  That's a long time.


#40 of 181 by steve on Thu Oct 8 15:57:13 1998:

   It was 62 days of uptime.  In the last 6 months M-Net's reliability
has gotten amazingly better.  It's a solid system now.

   Kevin, where were you telnetting from when this happened?


#41 of 181 by tsty on Fri Oct 9 02:27:56 1998:

true, steve .. and the m-b0x even recovered from two (yes, two)
vandal attacks within just hours. the attack&wipes were about 3 dyas
apart.


#42 of 181 by eeyore on Fri Oct 9 03:48:03 1998:

Well, I'm now using Alphaworks...and it seems to be working a bit better.


#43 of 181 by dpc on Sat Oct 10 01:49:38 1998:

Er, actually M-Net set a new record of 59 days, 10 hours and 33
minutes of uptime before it froze because it overheated.  Some really
vigorous discussions must have been going on!   8-)


#44 of 181 by mcnally on Sat Oct 10 06:02:04 1998:

  there's something charmingly oxymoronic in the phrase "froze because
  it overheated"..


#45 of 181 by steve on Sat Oct 10 21:45:41 1998:

   Hmmm... sure it wasn't 62 days?  Thats what I saw and remembered it
as two months.  Oh well, either number is impressive.

   But seeing as this is a the Grex problems item, I have a question
which is how many people get severe line noise, usually after being
connected a minute or so?  I'm trying to determine if I have a problem
or if grex does.


#46 of 181 by valerie on Sun Oct 11 15:07:19 1998:

This response has been erased.



#47 of 181 by keesan on Sun Oct 11 15:35:09 1998:

I finally figured out that to get to grex from the website you do not click
on Backtalk but on Go to the conferences.  And there I found the option of
choosing Pistachio backtalk, which requires any browser except lynx, i. e.,
a graphics-based browser.  My only web access is by dialing directly to grex
and using lynx.  This apparently means that people who dial in to grex and/or
are using older computers cannot use Pistachio.  Therefore there is no way
that I can change the title of an item.  Am I wrong?  If I am not wrong, could
someone correct this situation so that local users who dial in, and
telnetters, can do the same things as those who access from the website?

Also, I tried to do lynx to www.cyberspace.org/nu/newuser.html and was told
it was 'not found on this server'.  That is what I was told was a way to
create a newuser account directly rather than going to the main website.  Did
I do something wrong?  


#48 of 181 by eeyore on Mon Oct 12 01:36:35 1998:

re:46 Valerie, it's the best that I have out of three!  (pretty pathetic, eh?


#49 of 181 by cmcgee on Mon Oct 12 13:51:34 1998:

Email correspondents have reported intermittant refusals of mail addressed
to cyberspace.org.  grex.cyberspace.org seems to work fine.


#50 of 181 by senna on Mon Oct 12 15:22:53 1998:

Colleen, that may be because they sent mail to cyberspace.org while mail was
down and marcus was cleaning out spam.


#51 of 181 by tpryan on Mon Oct 12 16:14:25 1998:

        What just happened here at noon time with load number to past
36.0 instead of more normal 3.0?  It sure made GREX intolerable.


#52 of 181 by valerie on Mon Oct 12 16:59:06 1998:

This response has been erased.



#53 of 181 by senna on Tue Oct 13 00:51:04 1998:

Actually, the slowdown reminded me of what grex used to be like on the old
computer more than anything else.


#54 of 181 by keesan on Tue Oct 13 02:42:16 1998:

Got right to the webpage for newusers this time, Valerie.
I was using Vanilla to enter a response in Backtalk, after reading that
Pistachio could not be used with lynx.  I have not tried to use it, since I
was told that I could not.  Do you want to check if it is possible, and then
if it is, change the instructions?  I would still like to retitle an item.
And why do you have to go to the website to retitle an item instead of doing
it directly, after dialing in or telnetting in?


#55 of 181 by remmers on Tue Oct 13 13:34:12 1998:

The pistachio interface uses an HTML facility called "frames", which 
lynx probably doesn't support.

Dialup/telnet and web connections use Picospan and Backtalk, 
respectively, for accessing the conferences. These are entirely 
different pieces of software. Picospan doesn't support retitling items, 
and since we don't have source code for Picospan, we can't change that.

I would think, though, that it would be possible to write a special 
purpose standalone privileged program that would do the same retitling 
that Backtalk does and could be invoked from the shell. So I suppose the 
real answer to your last question is that nobody has gotten around to 
doing the necessary programming. It shouldn't be hard to do - it would 
be a matter of lifting the relevant source code from Backtalk and 
repackaging it to work as a standalone command.


#56 of 181 by keesan on Tue Oct 13 18:33:37 1998:

Do I also have to use Pistachio to kill an item that I started?  Or can it
be done by a command from the Unix prompt?  (Classified items that sold).


#57 of 181 by richard on Tue Oct 13 22:19:28 1998:

I have a Backtalk query-- these days I backtalk more than I telnet and I 
find it frustrating that when I log into grex via backtalk, backtalk 
will not tell me if I have mail waiting.  Can backtalk not be programmed 
to check the mail ques just as Picospan does when one logs on via 
telnet?  

Why not add a button to the backtalk entrance screen that says 
"See if you have incoming mail?"  Then one could click if he/she wanted 
to check, and if there was mail waiting, they would know they should log 
back in via telnet.



#58 of 181 by fungster on Wed Oct 14 06:13:04 1998:

I've been kicked off twice now (once in the queue when I was in
the queue and only three were ahead of the line and one while
readingthe coop conference.) Both times, the result I got from the
telnet program (I telnet into a VAX before here) is:
%TELNET-I-TRYING, Trying ... 204.212.46.130
%TELNET-E-CONNFAIL, Failed to connect to remote host
-SYSTEM-F-UNREACHABLE, remote node is not currently reachable     
And, in the next minute after I get kicked, I can't
reach Grex, but after the minute all is fine and I'm back at the
end of the line :-( (all this was was within the last half hour)

BTW, lynx does support frames, although you have to toggle back
and forth to the frameset page.


#59 of 181 by remmers on Wed Oct 14 17:22:04 1998:

Pistachio keeps navigation buttons in a separate frame from item text.
In a graphical browser, this is quite convenient, because the navigation
buttons remain visible as the text is scrolled. If you have to toggle
back and forth to see different frames in lynx, you lose the
convenience.


#60 of 181 by senna on Wed Oct 14 18:57:06 1998:

They do?  Is this a new modification?  I was always annoyed with the fact that
I had to scroll to get to the navigation buttons before.


#61 of 181 by hhsrat on Thu Oct 15 01:33:05 1998:

I am using pistachio, and I can say for sure that I am not in any 
frames.  I have never seen frames when using backtalk.


#62 of 181 by senna on Thu Oct 15 05:04:57 1998:

That's what I thought.  I've never seen them easier, but I usually use
picospan while dialed in.


#63 of 181 by scott on Thu Oct 15 10:38:53 1998:

The frames in pistachio are not visible, but there nonetheless.  The buttons
at the top are in a frame.


#64 of 181 by senna on Thu Oct 15 14:39:41 1998:

Is it possible to put the buttons in a visible frame that doesn't scroll? 
It seems that that would be rather helpful.


#65 of 181 by valerie on Thu Oct 15 15:05:51 1998:

This response has been erased.



#66 of 181 by remmers on Thu Oct 15 23:03:10 1998:

Re resp:64 - To enable frames in Pistachio, go to the Entrance Page,
click on the "Personal Info" link, then on the "Set Options" link. On
the form that comes up, you can select whether or not you want frames.
Select "Yes". Then the navigation buttons will appear in a visible frame
that doesn't scroll.


#67 of 181 by saw on Fri Oct 16 01:06:15 1998:

Re rest:58 and resp:65 :  I've not had that problem with Grex, although
I *have* had a problem with being dumped.  I start typing something then
backspace and then decide to hit CTRL+C and it closes the connection.  I've
had this happen 2 or 3 times, but I've never been able to recreate the
problem.  In other words, when I *try* to get booted, it doesn't work, but
when I least expect it, boom!  Also, there have been times when Grex just
stops, but usually it starts working after a few minutes.  This is probably
due to either (1) some route between me and Grex broke temporarily or (2)
Grex's ISDN link dropped and has to redial..  other than that, I have no
problems using Grex.  (And really I don't consider those untolerable
problems.)


#68 of 181 by senna on Fri Oct 16 05:15:58 1998:

Really?  I had no idea that Pistachio was configurable.


#69 of 181 by rywfol on Fri Oct 16 07:31:13 1998:

I'm using Pistachio for the first time right now, having previously 
always used PicoSpan, and I'm amazed at how smooth it is.
This is going to make conferencing a lot easier.


#70 of 181 by valerie on Fri Oct 16 13:57:31 1998:

This response has been erased.



#71 of 181 by keesan on Sat Oct 17 01:05:54 1998:

Does anyone know why today we cannot download, using Ymodem (batch) or
Kermit, from home directory or email to our computer?  It worked yesterday
and suddenly all attempts Abort.  We have to get this woring withi two days.
Thanks.


#72 of 181 by kentn on Sat Oct 17 01:13:07 1998:

Is that on a dialup connection?


#73 of 181 by dsmith on Sat Oct 17 01:24:46 1998:

Yes, long distance dialup from N. Ohio.  I can upload just fine but cannot
download.  I tried this account and my own (this is Keesan typing).  Kermit
and Ymodem.  Ymodem worked yesterday okay.  I could upload a file and then
not download the same file, it Aborted.  We have only a dialup connection,
and an expensive one at that.  Any ideas?  Kent, can you try sb filename etc
and see if you can make it work and email us about what happens?  Use this
email address, please.  Thanks


#74 of 181 by janc on Sat Oct 17 02:33:27 1998:

(Using frames with Backtalk slows it down considerably, but it is kind
of nice not to have the buttons scroll off your screen all the time.  I
made them default off on Grex back when the net connection was really
really slow, and still haven't been tempted to change that.  Yes, there
are several things you can configure in Pistachio Backtalk.  Perhaps not
as many as one would like.)


#75 of 181 by valerie on Sat Oct 17 13:18:01 1998:

This response has been erased.



#76 of 181 by keesan on Sat Oct 17 14:30:21 1998:

Just in case we are doing something wrong, would someone check out if they
can upload with Ymodem or Kermit (dialup) and list for us exactly how they
do this, one step after another?  Thanks.  Jim will check all the settings,
or maybe even load another copy of Procomm without settings set.


#77 of 181 by aruba on Sat Oct 17 14:41:02 1998:

I just uploaded something successfully.  At my UNIX prompt I typed
   kermit -r
then I escaped back to my local communication software's prompt (I use
Kermit for DOS) and typed
   send trip.txt
And that was it.  I was sending a text file; if I had been sending a binary 
file, instead of "kermit -r" I would have typed
   kermit
   set file type binary


#78 of 181 by dsmith on Sat Oct 17 14:53:58 1998:

Jim just found the problem, he had somehow told Procomm to download the
file to a nonexistent directory, he may have overwritten Procomm at some
pooint and forgotten.  It was very useful to know that download was working,
which means the problem was at this end.  Since the comptuer and modem had
not changed (Valerie suggested checking theses) it had to be our software.
Thanks to everyone for ideas.  Hope not to do too many stupid things like
this.


#79 of 181 by other on Sat Oct 17 15:36:07 1998:

re #75:  Then we'll have a real "family" of backtalk interfaces!  ;)


#80 of 181 by jep on Fri Oct 23 13:39:21 1998:

I get an error when I try to reach Grex using the pistachio version of 
Backtalk, however the vanilla version works fine.

I reported the error in pistachio to backtalk@hvcn.org.  I'm noting that
 the vanilla version works for anyone who would prefer to use Grex via 
the WWW, but thought they had to use telnet to get in.


#81 of 181 by senna on Fri Oct 23 22:26:47 1998:

Grex was experiencing slowdown earlier today, STeve informed me it was a bomb.


#82 of 181 by remmers on Sat Oct 24 13:10:37 1998:

I use pistachio frequently (right now, in fact) and have never had
errors. It might be a problem with a config file in your home directory,
jep. I think pistachio might use a file called .backtalk, so you might
want to have a look at that.

Speaking of pistachio, the default background color seems to have
changed from pistachio green to a pastel shade of yellow sometime in the
last few days. Actually, I consider this an improvement, not a problem.


#83 of 181 by rywfol on Sat Oct 24 13:22:16 1998:

Yeah, I'd wondered about the color change.  I thought maybe I'd broken 
something. =)


#84 of 181 by hhsrat on Sun Oct 25 03:03:00 1998:

New color is easier on the eyes


#85 of 181 by valerie on Mon Oct 26 12:58:06 1998:

This response has been erased.



#86 of 181 by eieio on Mon Oct 26 13:05:14 1998:

(So then shouldn't it be called something like "French Vanilla" instead of
Pistachio?)


#87 of 181 by jep on Mon Oct 26 17:05:00 1998:

The error I reported in #80 appears to be a problem with the Arbortext 
proxy server, not with Backtalk.  I explained this to backtalk@hvcn.org.


#88 of 181 by remmers on Mon Oct 26 18:38:48 1998:

Re resp:86 - Indeed. It looks pretty close to french vanilla on my screen.


#89 of 181 by mcnally on Mon Oct 26 20:02:37 1998:

  maybe, in keeping with the nut-theme established with pistachio,
  you should use "blanched almond"
  
 (according to X11's rgb.txt file [maps RGB values to names] BlanchedAlmond
  is Red:255 Green:235 Blue:205.  actually, that makes it a little too pink
  for my tastes..)


#90 of 181 by keesan on Tue Oct 27 00:21:50 1998:

How many colors are color monitors displaying nowadays?  I thought 256 was
the maximum.  I have two colors - amber and black - but can't use pistachio
anyway because I access the web via grex/lynx.


#91 of 181 by mcnally on Tue Oct 27 01:15:52 1998:

  Generally the number of colors displayable isn't a function of the monitor
  (at least not the number of colors you're referring to, though there 
  presumably is a finite number of colors to which the monitor is limited,
  based on such things as the properties of the phosphors used and the amount
  of control over the electron gun..)

  I assume, though, that you're talking about the number of simultaneous
  displayable colors.  Although many people still use 256-color modes most
  new computers have enough video memory to display millions of colors at
  high resolutions.  (common numbers are 2^16 = 65536 colors, and 2^24 = 
  16.7 million colors..)


#92 of 181 by i on Tue Oct 27 01:20:01 1998:

Butter Pecan!

Flat-panel displays often do limit the number of colors that can be
displayed.....pity those rich enough to own flat panels.


#93 of 181 by keesan on Tue Oct 27 02:23:20 1998:

How many colors does a color TV display?


#94 of 181 by janc on Tue Oct 27 04:26:46 1998:

Three.


#95 of 181 by omni on Tue Oct 27 07:46:49 1998:

There can only be One True Color. Chocolate. Learn it, Live it, Love it.


#96 of 181 by senna on Tue Oct 27 11:39:54 1998:

I deleted a nice piece of spam that someone sent to everybody who was on grex
at the time asking for help.  Are there policies about this?



#97 of 181 by eieio on Tue Oct 27 15:19:53 1998:

(And I won't leave until I get my chocolate back.)


#98 of 181 by rcurl on Tue Oct 27 16:17:57 1998:

I was #85 in the queue this morning. Has a new floodgate opened? :)


#99 of 181 by mcnally on Tue Oct 27 17:04:03 1998:

 re #92:  Since she said "monitor" I decided not to go into the limitations
 of the LCD display devices but yeah, you're right..



#100 of 181 by valerie on Wed Oct 28 03:42:35 1998:

This response has been erased.



#101 of 181 by eieio on Wed Oct 28 10:02:26 1998:

I was #45 in the queue, at 5 in the morning, EST! I'm guessing that at least
one person typed the following phrase: "hay u wanna hotchat me? i like sexy!"


#102 of 181 by carson on Wed Oct 28 11:20:11 1998:

(eieio must have tailed the party log looking for my name...)


#103 of 181 by keesan on Wed Oct 28 15:06:30 1998:

Re 100, I just did use Pistachio, it works.  Some day someone with spare time
can remove that statement to the effect that you cannot use it with lynx.


#104 of 181 by eieio on Wed Oct 28 19:06:58 1998:

About the only good thing I can say about today...
 
+ Well, at least it was *JUST* a month and a half worth of email that was
lost.


#105 of 181 by senna on Wed Oct 28 19:46:40 1998:

I have also noticed that the queue has been unusually long lately.


#106 of 181 by eire on Thu Oct 29 02:23:52 1998:









I haven't been able to tel net in today...Is it a problem on my end or are
others having the same problem?


#107 of 181 by eire on Thu Oct 29 02:24:35 1998:

View "hidden" response.



#108 of 181 by valerie on Thu Oct 29 13:50:22 1998:

This response has been erased.



#109 of 181 by eire on Fri Oct 30 01:49:40 1998:

it just stays at the same screen...a blip and right where I was again


#110 of 181 by scott on Fri Oct 30 18:14:43 1998:

Grex is curretly having a lot of packet loss on the net link.


#111 of 181 by keesan on Fri Oct 30 19:39:46 1998:

Took an unusually long time an hour ago to send a very short email.


#112 of 181 by valerie on Sun Nov 1 20:40:04 1998:

This response has been erased.



#113 of 181 by hhsrat on Mon Nov 2 01:49:25 1998:

I'm reading Agora in Backtalk, I tried to find Item 98 because my item 
list jumps from 96 to 99 (I know 97 is retired, but I can still read 
it).  I couldn't find 98 as being retired or active.  Is there an item 
98?


#114 of 181 by valerie on Mon Nov 2 08:37:45 1998:

This response has been erased.



#115 of 181 by tpryan on Mon Nov 2 17:30:02 1998:

        So, then, PICO does not reserve an item number at 'enter' time,
but gets the next available number at 'would you like to submit this
item' time?


#116 of 181 by remmers on Mon Nov 2 17:48:37 1998:

Something like that, with the caveat that when an item is killed,
its number remains unavailable.


#117 of 181 by eire on Mon Nov 2 22:40:47 1998:

Valerie:  I basically rub two sticks together to grex...windows
95....haha..I'm still using windows 3.1...I am able to telnet from anyplace
but the grex welcome page...maybe it's me.....


#118 of 181 by valerie on Tue Nov 3 20:15:24 1998:

This response has been erased.



#119 of 181 by shivi on Wed Nov 4 17:55:01 1998:

Get me some nachos, sombody. I'm sick.


#120 of 181 by danr on Thu Nov 5 01:08:02 1998:

This is the system problems item, not the shivi problems item. :)


#121 of 181 by senna on Tue Nov 10 09:21:42 1998:

I've been dialing in of late and receiving dead air.  No "you will be
connected shortly" message, no echo, nothing.  I think a modem's down or
something.  I've had to do some creative dialing twice now to get a working
connection.  Any idea on what's up?


#122 of 181 by scott on Tue Nov 10 11:49:34 1998:

There might be a modem that needs reprogramming.  I'll have to check into
that.


#123 of 181 by davel on Tue Nov 10 15:12:57 1998:

I had this happen to me this morning, a few minutes ago.  Connect, but no
message even from the term server.


#124 of 181 by other on Tue Nov 10 19:06:11 1998:

ditto yesterday.


#125 of 181 by janc on Tue Nov 10 19:14:39 1998:

Did our trunk hunt get messed up when we dropped those two lines?


#126 of 181 by scott on Tue Nov 10 21:04:40 1998:

SHouldn't be.  In any case, the numbers were the last 2, and when I got 
the problem there weren't that many people on thru the modems.  I'll 
have to drop by and reprogram the modems and probably reboot the 
terminal server as well.


#127 of 181 by mcnally on Tue Nov 10 23:18:23 1998:

  I got the same thing..  Dialed into 761-3000, no login prompt.
  Hung up and dialed 761-5041 and everything was peachy.  Didn't
  bother to track it down any further in the hunt sequence but
  I'm sure you've got a flaked-out modem..


#128 of 181 by scg on Tue Nov 10 23:28:38 1998:

761-5041 is now the second modem in the hunt, so assuming nobody else was
calling in or logging off at the same time, that will have tracked it down.


#129 of 181 by scott on Wed Nov 11 01:16:52 1998:

It may be intermittant.  Last time we had odd troubles, I just reprogrammed
all the modei.  That's not a big deal, actually, since I've got scripts on
my Newton to do the programming.  

Interestingly, the newer modems without the dumb mode seem to be more stable
than the older ones.  Mind you, that's a 0.001% problem given how much traffic
these modems carry.


#130 of 181 by keesan on Wed Nov 11 03:24:14 1998:

5159 works perfectly.


#131 of 181 by scott on Wed Nov 11 11:52:24 1998:

(I'd be much happier if everybody used 761-3000, only going to other numbers
as a last resort, BTW)


#132 of 181 by dpc on Wed Nov 11 15:06:18 1998:

I had the same problem as the others on the morning of 11/10 when I
dialed into 761-3000.  I got in on 761-4931, which is the number I
always try second, for reasons lost in the mists of time.


#133 of 181 by remmers on Wed Nov 11 15:48:22 1998:

Grex was off the net early this morning but is back on again.


#134 of 181 by keesan on Wed Nov 11 19:48:33 1998:

5159 works faster than 3000.


#135 of 181 by scott on Wed Nov 11 19:56:22 1998:

With identical hardware?


#136 of 181 by tpryan on Wed Nov 11 22:47:40 1998:

        Could 761-4931 be the old break between fast and slow modems.


#137 of 181 by scg on Thu Nov 12 04:55:28 1998:

Nope, that was 761-5041.  We rearranged the hunt group to try to get people
to dial into the beginning of the hunt group, which makes various things much
easier for the staff.


#138 of 181 by keesan on Mon Nov 16 21:30:45 1998:

Last night the grex phones were busy from 8:20 to 8:30 and this afternoon from
4:03 to 4:16.  If this ends up adding up to 30 minutes/week for more people
than me, I suggest restoring one phone line, or is there some problem with
the phone lines at present?  Apart from Sunday at 8 and weekdays at 4, what
other busy times should I beware of?


#139 of 181 by keesan on Tue Nov 17 01:30:59 1998:

I think the problem may have been my dialing 5159, apparently if the numbers
near the end of the trunk are busy I do not get routed to the beginning.  I
will figure out how to change the timeout period in Procomm so as to use 3000.


#140 of 181 by scg on Tue Nov 17 02:46:00 1998:

Right.  You only get all the lines if you dial in on 761-3000.  That's why
people should dial in on 761-3000.


#141 of 181 by hhsrat on Tue Nov 17 16:19:23 1998:

11am-1pm is a pretty busy time to telnet in


#142 of 181 by tsty on Wed Nov 18 11:40:45 1998:

i started out as #87 in line... 2.5 hours ago...


#143 of 181 by krj on Wed Nov 18 16:48:49 1998:

I started item:128 for whining about the telnet queue.
(Yes, I'm one of the whiners.)


#144 of 181 by keesan on Wed Nov 18 22:39:22 1998:

I have been unable to reach grex for two days, after changing to dialing 3000
instead of 5159.  Jim set Procomm up to time out after 30 sec, I have not been
able to figure out how to make this longer, anyone happen to know?  I finally
dialed 5159 again and got connected immediately.  Sent a couple of files via
M-Net and they don't seem to support x or y modem.  Is there some way to set
up the trunk thing so that if the last couple of numbers are busy it goes back
to the beginning?


#145 of 181 by davel on Thu Nov 19 02:48:56 1998:

Sindi, is this DOS Procomm Plus?  It's been a long time, but I might be able to
check ...


#146 of 181 by davel on Thu Nov 19 02:53:47 1998:

(If it's Windows Procomm, change it thus: open the dialing directory.  In the
menu bar at the top, click on Options, then on Call Settings.  But I think
I remember that you're using DOS Procomm ... vague memory says to me that it's
somehow through the dialing directory in that, too; could be wrong.)


#147 of 181 by bean on Thu Nov 19 04:11:07 1998:

20 waiting, 26 remote, 4 local users, 72 max remote users, 6735 head
 
Okay, I give up, why are 20 waiting if only 26 are on?


#148 of 181 by scott on Thu Nov 19 11:55:16 1998:

If DOS, try hitting the End key while it is dialing.


#149 of 181 by keesan on Thu Nov 19 18:21:17 1998:

I hit the end key while dialing, but also had to hit return key in order for
the count to resume.  Reset to 60 sec, it still timed out on both 3000 and
5141 at 9600.  After five or so tries, I finally tried 3000 at 2400 and
connected in 12 sec total.  The attempt at 9600 gave me a high-pitched squeal
at about 25 seconds that continued to 60 sec.  (5059 gets a recording, this
number no longer in service).  This problem started two days ago.  I dialed
M-net okay and got through to 3000 at 9600 yesterday, so assume my modem ok.
Can anyone explain why the lower speed will connect but not 9600?


#150 of 181 by keesan on Thu Nov 19 23:29:58 1998:

Changing the wait time with end is only temporary, it seems.
Again I could not get through at 9600, should I wait more than 60 sec?
2400 bps worked in exactly 12 sec.  Is there a bad line from here to there?
They fixed a break in it in August when it went dead.


#151 of 181 by scg on Fri Nov 20 01:52:57 1998:

You might also try a different modem.


#152 of 181 by mcnally on Fri Nov 20 07:24:09 1998:

  I agree..  Sounds like your modem doesn't negotiate well with at least
  one of the early trunk modems.  Given that you presumably have access to
  a pool of cheap used modems at Kiwanis, why not try another for a while?


#153 of 181 by keesan on Fri Nov 20 22:33:33 1998:

But why did my modem connect okay to Arbornet at 9600 bps in 19 seconds, but
not in 60 sec to Grex 3000 or 5041, and just fine at 2400?  And why did it
work until three days ago?  I will try another modem and report back.
(Or maybe grex should replace the problem modem?  What is the high-pitched
squeal that I got after 25 seconds on grex at 9600?


#154 of 181 by mdw on Sat Nov 21 02:42:24 1998:

That's the pig.


#155 of 181 by scg on Sat Nov 21 04:14:17 1998:

There are standards for how modems are supposed to communicate at various
speeds.  If all manufacturers stuck exactly to the standards, all modems would
talk to eachother.  In practice, that's not the case.  Many, perhaps most,
modems deviate from the standards in one way or another, but have generally
been tested carefully to make sure that they will still talk to modems that
do adhere to the standards.  However, when you get two modems that deviate
from the standards in opposite directions, you start having trouble.


#156 of 181 by valerie on Sun Nov 22 01:39:08 1998:

This response has been erased.



#157 of 181 by other on Sun Nov 22 13:22:45 1998:

8:22am  up 3 days, 18:31,  3 users,  load average: 0.22, 0.14, 0.00


#158 of 181 by keesan on Mon Nov 23 01:02:53 1998:

Jim suggested a dirty contact, unplugging and replugging, but just in case
we switched modems and connected with a Compudyne in 22 sec.  If it had been
modem incompatibility I would not have been using grex for the past six months
with the other modem.


#159 of 181 by scg on Mon Nov 23 01:59:19 1998:

That's not quite true.  Grex has two different kinds of modems in its hunt
group.  That is, they're the same brand and model and everything, but they
made some changes at some point so the newer ones are different from the older
ones.  It's possible that when you started dialing into the beginning of the
hunt group instead of somewhere near the end, you started using a different
version of the modem on Grex's end than you had been using before.


#160 of 181 by keesan on Tue Nov 24 19:23:49 1998:

I was dialing to both 5159 and 3000 and connecting fine.  My new modem does
not put garbage on the screen in random places like the old one seems to have
been responsible for doing (a screenful when I logged off).


#161 of 181 by senna on Thu Nov 26 09:27:00 1998:

Okay, I'm going to be picky and bring up my text droppage problem again.  The
difficulty appears to originate from my computer at some point, but it's still
annoying.  When I recieve text, random parts (in substantial portions) get
left out.  This includes all characters, including enters or line breaks, so
large amounts of text like bbs or party are very difficult to read.  If
possible, this is even worse when I dial into mnet.  It only occurs when I
dial in, which is when I'm using hyperterminal.  Any ideas?


#162 of 181 by remmers on Thu Nov 26 12:13:09 1998:

Sounds like a flow control problem. Check your modem and hyperterminal
settings.


#163 of 181 by mcnally on Fri Nov 27 06:11:20 1998:

  It does sound like a flow-control problem.  But rather than check your
  Hyperterm settings I recommend that you junk it entirely.  Even if it
  has nothing to do with your current problem it's practically a no-lose
  move..


#164 of 181 by rtg on Sun Nov 29 06:08:04 1998:

What do you suggest as a freely-available replacement communications
program for Win95/8?
BTW - has anyone noticed that hyperterm is distributed on the WIN98 CD,
but the installation program doesn't download it?  I've been trying to get
it, or something better, loaded for a friend this week.


#165 of 181 by danr on Sun Nov 29 18:37:48 1998:

The hyperterm private edition you can download from www.hilgraeve.com is
decent.  It's what I use, but I'm not a heavy telnet user.


#166 of 181 by rywfol on Mon Nov 30 20:01:53 1998:

I've encountered a minor problem using Backtalk.
I posted a response in the Humor item which hadn't formatted correctly, 
so I erased it and rewrote the response.
When I submitted that response (and subsequently a third) they came up 
as erased immediately, though I did not erase them.
What causes this?


#167 of 181 by janc on Wed Dec 2 03:48:38 1998:

That's weird.  I don't know what could cause that.  I'll put it on my
list of things to investigate.


#168 of 181 by jeff on Sat Dec 5 00:22:37 1998:

 mutt doesn't work :(

 this is the error message I get:
/var/spool/mail/j/e/jeff: No such file or directory (errno = 2)
/var/spool/mail/j/e/jeff: No such file or directory (errno = 2)



#169 of 181 by mdw on Sat Dec 5 04:36:49 1998:

Try sending yourself mail first.


#170 of 181 by tpryan on Sun Dec 6 23:57:45 1998:

        mutt and jeff?


#171 of 181 by hhsrat on Mon Dec 7 02:25:39 1998:

Just wondering.  Is there any way to turn the !clickify command into a page on
the Grex Web Site?  I think that maybe it should be linked from the backtalk
welcome page or something. 


#172 of 181 by valerie on Mon Dec 7 20:46:51 1998:

This response has been erased.



#173 of 181 by dpc on Wed Dec 9 15:34:25 1998:

I just got a piece of e-mail whose last few lines were truncated when
I read the message using "!mail".  However, the message was *intact*
in my mbox.  The mail was 5 1/2 single-spaced pages.  Is this too long?
I've sent "staff" the details.


#174 of 181 by davel on Thu Dec 10 03:35:57 1998:

Did it perhaps have a line beginning "From " at about the point it
was truncated?  To make a random guess.


#175 of 181 by dpc on Thu Dec 10 19:05:23 1998:

No, it didn't, sorry.


#176 of 181 by desolato on Thu Dec 10 22:44:01 1998:

5:41pm  up 11 days,  4:32,  76 users,  load average: 26.97, 25.59, 22.48
 ?????


#177 of 181 by steve on Fri Dec 11 16:38:29 1998:

   Grex isn't on the net right now.  Something upwind of us is having
problems.  We're getting 95% packet loss at the moment.


#178 of 181 by remmers on Fri Dec 11 18:18:14 1998:

That problem's evidently been fixed, since I'm conferencing via
Backtalk.


#179 of 181 by rtg on Wed Dec 16 07:43:43 1998:

about that time, I was having trouble getting to other sites also, but I
was too busy to make any attempt to find the bottleneck.


#180 of 181 by mark1 on Mon Dec 21 14:25:38 1998:

sometimes when i use pico and Pine, i get wierd letters that automaticlly come
on my message.  Wazzup?


#181 of 181 by cmcgee on Mon Dec 21 18:57:19 1998:

There might be a problem with a modem on line 3000.  I just tried to dial in,
and was told "no carrier" on that line.  Dialing in on 4931 worked just fine.


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: