277 new of 457 responses total.
re #180 Every password cracker in existence relies on assumptions like that.
Re resp:180: Why not just write a procmail filter to drop 100K+ messages, if that's what you want? I hope staff gets the kinks worked out of Grex's new system, soon. So far, it looks like the old Sun was more reliable.
i hope nobody hacked my account :(
> Alternative: stamp your little feet and declare yourself a "paying member" > of grex, which, I understand, accepts contributions. News flash: That won't help the situation ONE BIT. Despite whatever revenues grex may take in - which can pay for hardware and utilities - its labor and brain power comes only from human volunteers. If the system is not reliable - and lately it has not been - then grex users are at the mercy of whatever time volunteer staff may or may not have available to give to grex, and access to the new facility. I have seen the light: grex has been so reliable for so long that I have come to rely on that. And that was unwise, and unfair. If I'm smart I will start to wean myself off grex...
Or you can volunteer your time to help Grex get back up to being super reliable.
And see if the STeve of Oz lets you.
Nope, I don't have the expertise necessary, nor the proximity to the location, nor the inclination. If I want a reliable system, I should not be relying on grex - that is the conclusion that all should recognize.
MOVE ON -Mary Remmers
And I'm sure many of us will remember being told to "move on," when it comes time to renew our memberships...
GreX should adopt a no-ID policy wrt memberships
I have no evidence that Grex was vandalized. Believe me, I looked and I've not seen anything that indicates that. Based on previous examples of vandalism on Grex and M-net and other such systems, a rm -rf / is one of the more common things done to systems. The Sun-4/670 was incredibly reliable. It's tough to match that, but I think we can. I realize that the current system has had problems, which combined with other stuff has made for long periods of downtime. STeve of Oz, eh? Ok.
Changing one's password is never a bad idea. How often do people actually change their passwords, I wonder. Another reason I don't think Grex was vandalized was the fact that the nulogfile that newuser writes data into was completely weird for many accounts. Someone breaking in wouldn't do that.
re #191 I wasn't referring to "vandalism". Did you miss the bit about "cracking"? A corrupt passwd file should prompt staff to request all users to change their passwords ASAP, don't you think?
Cracking is vandalism.
Re: 188 & 189 You guys are such drama queens. Grex is unreliable at the moment and probably will be for some time to come. If you have important files here, make sure they are backed up. If you need mail, I mean NEED mail, Grex should not be your primary mail drop. Realize that, find reliable email elsewhere, and stop acting like clients not getting their expected service. We aren't into service. We're into community. Don't donate based on services you expect to receive. That's expecting more than we're prepared to give. We are run by volunteers who are pretty thinly spread at the moment. And we can't beat them into giving more of their time. So it's up to the users to back off and be as supportive and patient as they can. Not into that? Then you really should move on. Grex isn't going to work for you.
But what if the "paying members"
stamp their little feet?
Just teasin' ya.
tod has motivated me to change passwords.
man I wish I could lern to be one o'them thar Drama Queens
re #195 Re: 188 & 189 You guys are such drama queens. I prefer "prima attore" if you don't mind! 8P
i changed my passwd. thanks, tod !
I'm not that sure that we need a bigger mail partition. The one time I saw it fill up, it was due to a single user's mail file that grew way, way big. When I deleted that file, mail was only like 46% full. I probably should have studied the file before deleting it, because theoretically no mail file should ever be able to grow that big. The mailbox quota software I wrote should prevent it. But evidentally there is a weakness in that somewhere. If we got a bigger mail partition, but didn't fix this bug, then I presume it would still fill up. If we do fix the bug, maybe we don't need a bigger mail partition.
Thats a good point, Jan. I saw the account thats been hogging so much of /var/mail, so I did a talk at him. Turns out he's been harassed by someone where he is, who subscribed him to a bunch of things. He said he had in the process of getting off them, and I think that perhaps he did it, since I haven't seen much activity on that account lately.
This response has been erased.
Anything that is misconfigured is going to be a problem, Dan. You know that. I don't understand your negative attitude towards OpenBSD. I think you know that the panics we've seen have been related to the networking card. OpenBSD 3.5 had a few problems with it, and we've seen them. But I'll tell you what we haven't seen: random breakins with filesystems being destroyed, mail from root to staff ala "we 0wn u", mail sent from others accounts by someone with root, or any of the other marvelous little things that vandals do. And believe me, people are trying, *all the time*. The number of exploits I've seen brought over here, and the number of strange little one screen programs making odd kernel calls is as high as I have ever seen, only they're more tailored for OpenBSD. Given the history of security on SunOS, we're a trophy. I've been told this at least three times. There are people who really dislike us just because we had the sense to lock down the system back when NFS explots and remote mountings were common enough that Grex not doing those things was rare. I wish I'd had more time in the last several months to collect some of the crap I've seen people try and run. But that we're still here, haven't lost the system says *a lot*. Have we had problems? Yes. We started out on the wrong version of OpenBSD, by not using the latest. I do not fault Jan for this; after all, he just about single handedly got the system up. I was certainly useless during most of that time. So we've been running a version behind from the start. Our upgrade is going to change a lot of things, and I'm going to be very surprised if we don't see an elimination of the nic problem. The quota problem we saw I think is fixed but I haven't looked at the cvs logs closely. Nothing is perfect. As Marcus and I have said in the past we've embarked upon an interesting journey here, in going to a modern operating system. SunOS was stable, but also had the advantage of being obscure enough so as to not to attract a lot of vandal attention. Now that we're out of that world we live in an enviroment where people do try active exploits, and have access to the source. Ultimately the open source model makes for much better security, but if we do find that an exploit is out there we'll have to act quickly. I'll point out that FreeBSD is in exactly the same position here. If something comes out, swift reaction is needed. Had we a pile of money I'd go for the raid design. When we were first talking of building a new Grex it hadn't occured to me that we wouldn't have constant access to the hardware. I guess I fumbled on that one--it should have been talked about more. Given Grex's budgetary restraints at the moment I don't think that this is the best thing to do at the moment. We need to get Grex 1) reliable, 2) deal with the amazing Spam problem. Once we have a system that resembled the stability of the Sun-4/670 we can start thinking of other improvements; raid would certainly be a nice thing to have. Lastly, Grex does beat on its disks Dan. You've never been in the Pumpkin and listened to the disks. I remember a time some years ago that Marcus and I sat next to Grex just listening to the noises the disks were making. The activity lights were furiously blinking away and we could hear the HP disk and at least one other as people were doing things. Long time Grex folks will remember the various disks we beat to death over the years, going all the way back to the little 40M (not gig--meg) SMD disk that Marc Unangst and I battled. What may be different now is our current system; given the extra ram we have we might be significantly be reducing disk movement. I don't know.
I agree with Dan: Grex is not (or, not quite the same thing, should not be) an exceptionally disk-intensive system for a multi-user server. If disk is really thrashing that much we ought to (a) examine the partitioning scheme, (b) look at other tuneable disk parameters, (c) maximize caching. Even with 30-40 users logged on most of the time it doesn't make sense to me that Grex's disks are getting pounded so hard, especially not the user partitions. I also agree with him that the explanation for the recent crash was quite surprising to me. Did I gather correctly that an ordinary unprivileged user can take Grex down with a fork bomb? Haven't we set per-user file, memory, and process limits to reasonable values? I think I read recently that OpenBSD doesn't set those in the default install, but are they set now?
Re network card-induced panics: I recently had that same problem with FreeBSD. Near as I can tell, the RealTek driver is buggy. OpenBSD shares most of the same driver code, so if you have any RealTek cards in use, you may want to change them. This may be a bug that only rears its head on Alpha platforms, though.
I've seen no clear evidence on what cause the last crash. We do have a core dump and kernel image saved from that panic. It looked like something went very bad while attempting to close a file descriptor. That could be a network issue, or it could be just about anything else. We've twice now had the password file corrupted. STeve attributed the first one to a disk error. I assume he had evidence for that, but the few times I tried to access that disk, I never got a single error message off it. Now we have a second crash where the passwd database got corrupted and I can't help wondering if something else might be going on. I wish somebody had time to properly analysize these things.
Yea, Dan. Its the DISKS, Dan. It gives worms to ex-girlfriends, Dan. <pats self on back like bird flapping wings> What's wrong with the RAID suggestion? It makes sense. If RAID won't fix the problem then the OS needs to be replaced.
This response has been erased.
This response has been erased.
re #207 Okay, I'll let the cat out of the bag: Staff had a report of a security problem where a random, unauthorized users could run *cat* on a tty device and see users connecting and typing their passords. This was on Grex? Were the users notified that they should change their passwords?
FWIW, I think the security arguments for OpenBSD over FreeBSD are overstated. FreeBSD gets the benefits of OpenBSD's code audits, because a lot of code is shared. I also suspect FreeBSD has a larger installed base, which tends to flush out driver problems sooner. I never ran into them on my x86 machines. I've run into a few on my AlphaPC, but Alpha is a minority platform that doesn't receive as much testing. I'm not trying to weigh in on one side or the other here. I'm just saying that the two operating systems are, from my perspective, extremely similar, so I think in many ways it's an arbitrary decision. Migrating from OpenBSD to FreeBSD, if you choose to do so, would probably be fairly painless; much of the configuration is kept in the same places. It still may not be easier than fixing what you've got, though. (Incidentally, keep in mind that OpenBSD's much-touted "only one hole in the last 8 years" security claim applies only to *remote* exploits. That suggests to me that security in a situation where you have local shell users may not be their first priority.)
This response has been erased.
re #203 Did I gather correctly that an ordinary unprivileged user can take Grex down with a fork bomb? Haven't we set per-user file, memory, and process limits to reasonable values? That's what I read from the explanation. re #211 What's more, most of the security auditing that happens is poorly done by amateurs. I wouldn't rely on it to run a bank. I would hope you would want better security for the financial or healthcare sector than for Grex, too. ;) At least with Grex, I'd hope we could find a way to keep the system from crashing for several days at a time.
Since I don't want to see this dissolve into a BSD-vs-BSD flame-war
death match, I'm going to try to subvert the conversation by proposing
some concrete suggestions that don't require immediate consensus on
the OS issue and don't require planning an OS upgrade or replacement
any time soon.
How about if we begin by:
Immediate, Critical:
1) Fixing the TTY security problem if it isn't already solved.
2) Make sure that sensible run-time limits are enforced and that
no ordinary user can cripple or crash the system with a fork
bomb.
Very Important:
3) Ensure that Exim version is sufficient to use recent SpamAssassin
integration features and begin testing system load under more
aggressive spam-filtering program.
4) Verify whether network driver support for RealTek NICs really is
affected by known bugs and add new ethernet card based on better-
supported chipset to system if so.
5) Consider setting up CVS or other versioning system to checkpoint
multiple backup copies of critical system files like /etc/passwd.
6) Research OpenBSD disk problems to see whether others are experiencing
similar crashes, in which case we should reconsider OpenBSD, or,
if not, we should consider the possibility of hardware problems as
a root cause.
> I wouldn't rely on it to run a bank. With most financial institutions, security is concentrated on the perimeter, usually because the mainframe systems that run banking software use insecure operating systems (Windows 2000 Datacenter comes to mind).
re #214 With most financial institutions, security is concentrated on the perimeter Actually, security is concentrated "in depth" as in at multiple layers like a fortress with a moat, gate, guard tower, huge wall, etc A firewall simply doesn't cut it anymore when you have GLBA worries, IT productivity problems, password headaches, etc.. The least you should have are 2 firewalls with different flavors at the perimeter of a financial institution but this is not a DMZ or IPS discussion. The fact is, Grex had a security flaw and it wasn't reported to the users. I'm disheartened at how this and the subpoena discussions have been buried from the public discussion.
Sure, and also financial security is based on the concept of transactions and auditability. Grex doesn't have such beasts.
This response has been erased.
Re #215 - In Grex's defense, perhaps the Coop conference is a more appropriate place to discuss Grex policies regarding notifying users. I've posted an item that hopefully attracts some comments on the pros/cons. Re #216 - It used to be that Banks didn't have to care very much about their customer's names and addresses, etc...because this data was regularly bought and sold to other companies. But the GLBA now requires us to safeguard this information with the utmost diligence...to the extent that some banks will fire employees for not locking their PCs and leaving them with customer information still on the screen.
We use a Broadcom 5702x nic. Grex isn't a transaction system. I will agree that such a thing presents more of a load than Grex does, but it also has hardware better suited to that task. We've *listened* to the disks Dan. Honestly. There were times on the Sun-4/670 that you could just sit there and hear them madly running around. Perhaps I didn't say it well enough but OpenBSD may be significantly different from SunOS in this regard; maybe it will be kinder on the disks due to caching issues. I guess we'll see.
Maybe IDE would be kinder than SCSI?
i use FreeBSD and Realtek and am pleased by the performance of both.
I don't think the disk interface matters much. However, it has occured to me in the last few minutes that we're swimming in disk compared to what we had under SunOS: 256M there, and 1.5G here. That will eliminate swapping and use about 75M ram for file caching which will also help. I just changed the default limits in /etc/login.conf for maxproc to 32. Maxproc-max was at 128.
Now, as for sd0 having a problem, I just mounted it and tried copying spwd.db to /dev/null. It failed. The message in /var/log/messages is May 3 15:00:59 grex /bsd: sd0(ahc1:0:0): Check Condition on opcode 0x28 May 3 15:00:59 grex /bsd: SENSE KEY: Media Error May 3 15:00:59 grex /bsd: INFO FIELD: 116647 May 3 15:00:59 grex /bsd: ASC/ASCQ: Unrecovered Read Error May 3 15:00:59 grex /bsd: FRU CODE: 0xe4 May 3 15:00:59 grex /bsd: SKSV: Actual Retry Count: 134 May 3 15:01:00 grex /bsd: sd0(ahc1:0:0): Check Condition on opcode 0x28 May 3 15:01:00 grex /bsd: SENSE KEY: Media Error May 3 15:01:00 grex /bsd: INFO FIELD: 116647 May 3 15:01:00 grex /bsd: ASC/ASCQ: Unrecovered Read Error May 3 15:01:00 grex /bsd: FRU CODE: 0xe4 May 3 15:01:00 grex /bsd: SKSV: Actual Retry Count: 134 There are other errors on the disk as well. When I tried to dd the entire disk I brought the system down, the day Joe said that newuser was failing. Have to go back and do work work now...
work work work
work plod work
plod no work,... abort, retry, or ignore?
This response has been erased.
Dan you are sliding off into fantasy land here. THE DISK HAS PROBLEMS. It is as simple as that. If no one else saw the errors it was because no one looked at /var/log/messages. I will point out that you could have rummaged around there yourself to find errors. Sigh, I don't know why I'm bothering to respond to some of your comments, but I will say that I think Marcus and I know the difference between the sound of bearings and the noise a disk makes when the heads are constantly moving.
We're not worthy.
Re resp:211: In my (admittedly limited) experience, banks run on Windows and proprietary mainframes. The bank I worked for had *no* Internet connections at all, though. All branch-to-branch connections were on leased lines. Re resp:213: #3 is a minor issue. AFAIK there are no major bugfixes in recent versions of Exim. While versions earlier than 4.50 do not come with Exiscan out of the box, it's easy to patch in, and the OpenBSD port probably already includes a flag you can toggle to include it. FreeBSD's does. Re resp:219: Are we swapping? Maybe we need more RAM. Even if we're not swapping, more RAM means more disk cache. RAM is cheap. Re resp:227: Those messages pretty clearly indicate a hardware problem, and if they were the result of an incorrect request on the part of the driver we'd be seeing them on the other disks, too. I think you're really reaching to blame OpenBSD here, which is unfortunate, because it makes this look like a matter of religion on your part instead of a technical argument. If you're really convinced that OpenBSD is somehow causing the illusion of a hardware failure on this disk, I suggest connecting it to another system running a different OS and trying to access it. That should settle the issue.
No, we're doing fine for ram, now. The 256M swapping situation was on the Sun-4/670. Unless spam processing eats up Grex's hardware I think the 1.5G we have will last for some time. Sorry I wasn't clear on that.
I just took a look, and we've currently got 1.2 gigabytes free, so I think you're right. I don't know how to find out how much OpenBSD is using as disk cache. In FreeBSD it's reported by "top", but that doesn't seem to be the case here.
Also, someone on staff should please read my last set of comments in the Exim item in the Garage conf. I clear up a couple of apparent misunderstandings in Grex's current exim.conf file, and point out some stuff that was copied verbatim from my example and shouldn't have been. It looks like those things still haven't been fixed.
Want to make up a diff?
This response has been erased.
1) The problem with permissions on the tty was our fault, I believe. Do you think that this was a part of the release, and that no one ever found it? We messed up, not the OS itself. I ask you to prove otherwise. If its a real bug in the distribution others would have seen it. 2/3) At least some of the crashes have been due to our nic. That code was worked on post 3.5 release. I won't say that we've not crashed for other reasons but have we properly analyzed it? The quota code could well have some problems. I'll bet we're pushing it. You are right that in our current configuration we are more disk intensive than if softupdates were on. I'm pretty sure that the softupdate code was changed post 3.5 and in visiting the changelog between 3.5 and 3.6, we find "Big FFS softdep merge with FreeBSD, fixing a number of bugs." In the changelog between 3.6 and 3.7 we find "Fix a soft dependencies problem that caused processes to get stuck." This was a part of some stuff from FreeBSD which wasn't complete apparently, and was then fixed. You know as well as I do that saying something "will be fixed in ..." is a dangerous thing to say. I'm not going to let your bias against OpenBSD make me say things that shouldn't be promised. But yes, I *do* think that 3.7 is going to be a good move for Grex, as will 3.8 and so on.
> I really want to know why people take one hypothesis I propose
> (which I clearly stated was a hypothesis) and fixating on that,
My own theory is that it's due to the somewhat confrontational tone
of your messages. Even though I agree with most of your conclusions
I'll admit I'm somewhat put off by the way you've worded your responses.
Presumably it's because you feel strongly about the issue, which I
applaud.
But if Grex wants to know why volunteer staff resources are drying up,
we need look no further than the way this and other "discussions" about
the system develop. Very few people will volunteer to join a flame war
already in progress. Of course it takes more than one party to have a
good fight but whoever's responsible for the tone maybe we can all just
back off a little bit and instead of concentrating on what possibly
*should* have been done, figure out what to do now.
> Okay, so here are my major points:
>
> (1) We've had one *major* security hole in OpenBSD.
Agreed, and frankly it's a baffling one for a supposedly
secure OS. Granted the security promise offered by OpenBSD
partisans is usually "Only <n> root exploits since <time t>"
but world-readable ttys is bizarre.
> I don't think it was a configuration issue.
I'm not so sure about this -- it seems incredible to assume
that if this were really the system default it wouldn't be
very widely known, and OpenBSD rightly slammed for it.
I think when I get home tonight I'm going to have to install
OpenBSD on a spare computer and test to see whether this is,
in fact, the way things work out of the box on OpenBSD.
> (2) OpenBSD crashes quite a bit more than I or anyone else am
> comfortable with. It doesn't appear to be because of the network
> driver. It often crashes when filesystem errors, or, apparantly,
> because the proc table gets full.
Because of the time investment required to change OSes again
and the fact that we don't know for sure that FreeBSD will be
better, I'm inclined to give OpenBSD more time to prove itself
providing:
(a) we can guarantee a fix to the fork-bomb vulnerability, and
(b) we replace put another disk in place of the one that's erroring.
Of course I'm not sure I even get a vote, but that would be my
recommendation if my advice were solicited.
> (3) Our *application* is not disk intensive, but because things
> like soft metadata updates aren't reliable on OpenBSD, we're
> *making it* disk intensive. If that's chewing up drives, then
> fine, but it's not grex has such a high volume of *usage* that
> it *has* to be that way. *REAL* high volume usage
>
> Steve, you were one of the people who were adament about OpenBSD.
> Please respond to these problems. Should I believe that they'll
> be solved in the newest version of OpenBSD? Or did we make a mistake
> going with OpenBSD?
Aren't there disk-usage monitoring tools we can use to get some
sense of what's going on with our disks? And would it help
relieve thrashing if we made /tmp a 512MB RAM disk or picked
something like that?
Something's already seriously wrong if / (containing /etc) is
being written to so often that disk corruption is regularly
bringing the system down. How many things need to write to /
anyway? Newuser? What else? Virtually everything else on the
system seems like it should write to /var, /tmp, or a bbs or
homedir partition.
sd0a went because of a general problem with it. I seriously doubt that the runs of newuser caused this. Though /a was on sd0 and that did have lots of i/o.
Re resp:234: Okay, I'll make one up and email it to you. Re resp:237 (1): I took a quick look at an OpenBSD 3.6 system at work. It's used strictly as a firewall, no local logins except root for maintenance, but that's not really relevant. What I found is that pseudo-ttys appear to be world-readable until they're used. For example, with root logged in on ttyp0: crw--w---- 1 root tty 5, 0 May 3 19:44 /dev/ttyp0 crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 5, 1 Dec 18 13:53 /dev/ttyp1 crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 5, 2 Dec 18 13:53 /dev/ttyp2 (etc.) Now, if I open another ssh connection, again as root: crw--w---- 1 root tty 5, 0 May 3 19:46 /dev/ttyp0 crw--w---- 1 root tty 5, 1 May 3 19:46 /dev/ttyp1 crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 5, 2 Dec 18 13:53 /dev/ttyp2 (etc.)
This response has been erased.
Let's reverse the tty problem for a minute--if it wasn't us, then it was in the release of OpenBSD 3.5. I've been looking for comments about that and haven't seen any so far. It could be the case that we didn't do anything, but I tend to think that the collective set of people who worked on the machine could have done something. I agree with you that we should dig into things. We crashed at least twice with a trace leading back to a bge symbol. I think thats fairly good evidence that it was in the nic. I'm obviously pro OpenBSD. I came to be that way after staring at several Linux flavors, then Net- and FreeBSD, then OpenBSD. Since Oct 1999 I've been using it exclusively and have found it rock stable except for when hardware problems have messed things up. I know of no other system that puts security and takes the pro-active stance of fixing things and developing enhancements like the write xor execute system. Grex needs these things. We get hit on by enough people that we need all the help we can get. It occurs to me that we ought to order a 3.7 CD set.
> Why don't we take some of the money we have in the bank and buy a > SCSI hardware RAID controller, and do disks properly, with 0+1 > striping of mirrors, so that in the event one disk dies, we don't > end up in these situations? I agree that a RAID set up would provide system continuity until a staff member can replace a drive. Personally, I prefere a RAID 5 set up with a hot spare (or RAID 5EE if we don't have a spare drive to spare...but I don't know if this is an IBM-only thing or what, so it might not be possible). Further, RAID 5 wouldn't batter the drives as much as RAID 0+1... BTW, I might be mistaken, but isn't RAID 1+0 more reliable just by the fact that a multiple-disk failure resulting in catastrophic data loss is statistically more likely with 0+1?
Dan, to be honest, I was with you until you started insisting that OpenBSD had caused a good disk to generate read errors. To me, that made it seem like you were really reaching for more reasons to dislike OpenBSD, and I'm having a tough time believing you're really taking an objective position, now.
This response has been erased.
Is the disk bad? Have we plugged it into another computer and verified it has problems?
No, the disk is still attached to Grex.
I should point out that in puting the sd0 disk in some other machine, it might work. It might appear OK for an hour, or a week. Moving a damaged disk jossles things. I had a small ide disk at work which did exaqctly this. It was flaky in the machine it was running on, but ran OK for some while on a test machine I had. Finally, after several days of pounding on it, the exact same error cropped up. This is rare, but if the problem involves something in the head or arm mechanics, anything can happen. I do not believe that will happen in this case but moving a suspect disk around can lead to unexpected results.
This response has been erased.
Let us know how the 3.7 disc works out.
If Plan9 has "dd", why not "fsck"? After all, "dd" isn't even (originally) native to Unix.
This response has been erased.
Yeeees, but you could still call it "fsck"....
They could also call it "scandisk". After all, lots more people are used to scandisk than fsck, right? What does it matter to you what they called it?
Just seems arbitrary to name Plan9 "dd" after Unix "dd" but not do the same with fdisk, that's all.
A lot of such decisions are arbitrary. Heck, on Linux, 'fsck' is really just a front end that calls any of a number of more specific filesystem-checking tools, depending on the type of filesystem in question.
FWIW, I've had a disk *image file* (created with 'dd if=/dev/hdc of=filename') produce read errors when used in the virtual machine it was attached to.
Three times now, with two different modems, we have dialed into grex and got garbage. The second dial logged us in. Another grexer reports that the modem on 484-0513 works but the first one does not, from his location. Is there any other reliable modem that could be switched with the 0512?
I think first we need to verify that the line and connection is OK, physically. Sindi, do you know when these problems started? That would be good to know.
This response has been erased.
The garbage on dialin happened this week, probably in the last three days. Jim mentioned it to me yesterday but I had already noticed. It might just have started yesterday. It occurred again this afternoon. Jim tried switching from 38 to 19K which did not help.
Is it always the same modem that messes up?
Drift: Does anyone else think that the fsck program name was partially chosen because it looks like a get-past-the-censors-disguise for the f-word? ;-)
We always dial 0512 but I don't know which modem we actually reach. SOmeone said the 0512 modem does not work for him but 0513 does, something about distance from the phone company.
Re: #259 - ah, I see. Re: #262 - Heh. I bet that is exactly the reason! :-)
hullo disk problems! there *IS* the best disk repair/recover software for everyone - and now spinrite 6 will also do xnix drives and mac drives. the procedure for xnix formatted drives is a tad more detailed but if you put *any* worth on your drives you simply must (sorry if that's preachy) run spinrite on them about every 6 months. i feel as if i *should* be preachign to the choir when i state adn restate the obvious, but the choir is still out of tune, it seems. spinrite 6 grc.com ............................... please!
oh, i also wnat to thankx STeve & company for all the extra efforts on behalf of grex. thank you very mulch.
Nonsense. None of that thank you stuff.
All we do is criticise, stamp our little feet,
and declare oursleves to be "paying members".
tsty get with the program dude.
Heh... The problem with disk "fixing" software is that is nearly all cases its a giant kludge. With bit densities being hundreds of millions+ per square inch, the most minute impurities left inside the disk case can cause disasters, and the tolerances for everything mechanical has shrunk to amazing porportions. This means that when something in a disk goes wrong its far harder to fix. When bad disks come in the disk oem's look at the control electronics and the disk case (mechanical) for problems. Depending on which they find bad they throw that away and put another "known good" component in, test it and then have a refurb disk for replacements. I'm not really happy with that but thats the way things are. Trying to alter a disks surface by rewriting something just isn't a good idea now. Back in the era of 300M disks it worked to some extent. Lastly, when you think of the sheer amount of data that you can put on a 100G+ disk, you have a huge investment in that data, be it personal or professional. It just doesn't make sense to trust kludges. Disks are too cheap not to replace; data is too expensive to replace.
Regarding modems, I got garbage again dialing 0512 and before the garbage there was briefly something about tty00. A second dialin immediately after connected me properly - does this imply that I got the second modem this time because the first was still tied up? If so can someone replace the first modem, or at least confirm the problem? We got it at two locations.
This response has been erased.
thanks for the mulch, tsty !
Snicker.
Re #268:
You have a point about attempting to 'fix' a bad disk. However, a program
that gets the disk electronics to cough up the truth about how much of the
disk is *really* damaged, and how many reserve sectors are left, might be
useful for monitoring purposes.
Re #270:
Humor or not, it may not be far from the truth. cf. HTML content, flash
animations, spam, etc.
Drew, the problem with that is when things are damaged, how can you trust the electronics? As an example, IBM has something called smart for their disks. It's a system where you can run a drive fitness test on a disk to get a sense of its health. I've found it to be useful in telling me whats wrong with a dead disk, usually. But it has failed me several times when testing a disk that the user said had acted weirdly. To be fair, it did catch a disk that was on the verge of going bad, but I still think the technology is ripe for improvement.
Re resp:270: It's definitely true where I work. I'm not sure how valuable Spinrite-style products really are these days. You can't directly address sectors on a disk anymore for testing -- the drive electronics hide all those details and remap bad sectors from a pool of spares. By the time there are actually visible bad sectors, the disk has been going south for a long time.
re #267 ... oh, right, i forgot. stomp sTomP SToMp st0MP, ds al coda ummmmmmmmm, about spinrite. every 'objection/dismissal' above demonstrates that not one of you has read up on *what* it does nor *how*! dammit!! there is *NO* comparable program in the universe. it FSCKING works! and all the hidden shit is bypassed, obviated, shunted, circumvented, counteracted and evaded <insert further descriptions here>. steve gibson is long overdue for a macarthur grant, imnsho. and one of it's best built-ins is that it catches stuff and fixes it BEFORE shit hits the fan. /sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeSH!
Configuration of the new disk isn't quite done; /var/log/wrttmp isn't there.
I have noticed that now when you !finger anybody to see when they logged in last, it says "never logged in" For any user that I've tried. I guess all recent login information has been lost?
I got garbage again the first time I dialed in but different looking garbage, and the same wrttmp message.
Re #274 and 275:
Out of curiosity I checked out a copy of Spinrite. It seems to do the
usual sector checking and attempted 'fixing', with five different levels of
intervention. But in addition, I've found a screen called "SMART settings"
that went something like this:
attribute event cnt margin
---------------------------------
ecc corrected: 0 149
rd chan margin: not reported
relocated sect: 0 60
realloc events: 0
seek errors: 0 49
spin-up retry: 0 49
recal retries: 0 49
cabling errors: 0
uncorrectable: 0
write errors: 0 149
temperature: 40'c /104'f
power-on time: 5,271
Not sure it means anything; a 'margin' of 149 sectors out of 63*255*thousands
seems rather tiny. But I think this is supposed to be the 'bypassing the drive
electronics' part of the program.
Spinrite also works on VMWare virtual machines. However, the SMART screen
does not appear; instead there's a message saying that SMART data is not being
reported.
/var/log/wrttmp seems OK to me. Is anyone else seeing problems with anything? The modems are a seperate issue, I think.
/var/log/wrttmp seems to be restricted-read. is it supposed to be?
The wrttmp problem is breaking "amin".
I get this when I log on: mesg: Unable to open /var/log/wrttmp to read/write I guess the mesg program needs access to that directory.
looks like /log wasn't permed correctly last: /var/log/wtmp: Permission denied mesg: Unable to open /var/log/wrttmp to read/write
The /log problem is fixed.
Thanks, STeve, for spending a gorgeous Saturday, working on Grex. And another thanks to Mark for picking up the new disk and seeing it got to STeve and that STeve got to Provide. Is newuser still off?
Yes, its still down. I need to finish ressuresting the accounts that got munged. This next week looks to be better crazy wise, so I should get it done in the next day or so.
I have changed my script to dial the second modem (0513) and no longer get garbage. Could someone replace the first modem, assuming we have another working one? Steve et al, thanks.
I'm sure we have spares. I forgot to reset the modei yesterday. That might be a good thing to do. So you've narrowed it down to the first modem. Good and thanks.
Thanks, Steve and team.
Someone else told me the first modem was bad. At least switch the two.
Next time I'm there I will. We need to have both of them working.
It looks like grex went of the 'net for about half an hour just after 6pm.
re #280 ... that disk was in pretty darn good shape based on those data. i have seen errors found/fixed inthe 200,000 + range (ForReal!)(tm). they were primarily ecc errors but other junk showed up in the 100,000+ range on other 'stuff'.
Does the bounce below from excite.com imply that one or more grex twits are
responsible for getting grex blacklisted re: mail delivery to excite.com?
(identifying information suppressed)
From MAILER-DAEMON Fri May 06 12:54:00 2005
Envelope-to: a_user@cyberspace.org
Delivery-date: Fri, 06 May 2005 12:54:00 -0400
X-Failed-Recipients: a_user@excite.com
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
From: Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon@cyberspace.org>
To: a_user@cyberspace.org
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 12:54:00 -0400
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
a_user@excite.com
SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT TO:<a_user@excite.com>:
host xmxpita.excite.com [208.45.133.107]: 554 Service unavailable; Client
ho
st [216.86.77.194] blocked using dynablock.excite.com; Your message could not
be
delivered due to complaints we received regarding the IP address you're using
o
r your ISP. See http://blackholes.excite.com/ Error:
WS-02
------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
Return-path: <a_user@cyberspace.org>
Received: from a_user by grex.cyberspace.org with local (Exim 4.42)
id 1DU65L-0006qP-U4
for a_user@excite.com; Fri, 06 May 2005 12:53:55 -0400
To: a_user@excite.com
Subject: a_subject
Message-Id: <E1DU65L-0006qP-U4@grex.cyberspace.org>
From: a_user's_name <a_user@cyberspace.org>
Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 12:53:55 -0400
a_subject
better get steve to write a few e-mails to abuse@gmail.com
a_steve
Are we supposed to have a ping command? It tells me 'not found'. I was wondering why sdf.lonestar.org suddenly froze up and cannot be accessed now.
Re. #300: I tried the "finger" command circa 1:05 p.m. and got the
following results:
> finger @sdf.lonestar.org
[sdf.lonestar.org/192.94.73.1]
must provide username
> finger staff@sdf.lonestar.org
[sdf.lonestar.org/192.94.73.1]
finger: staff: no such user
Given that the attempt to "finger" didn't time-out, I assume that they
are at least partially "up".
If lonestar has an uptime report page similar to that of Grex, you might
find more information there.
http://www.cyberspace.org/cgi-bin/uptime
They are online again now, but I was simply wondering why we have no ping.
abuse ... but you'll hvae to read it from someonw else, i guess. ,.
.,
Ping was disabled/removed for all but staff because it can be (and has been) used for denial-of-service attacks.
Just like /etc/passwd files, right, gelinas ?
I dialed 4840513 and got a busy number but 4840512 was free. Isn't it supposed to hunt through the 'queue' of both numbers?
Isn't 484-0512 the 1st number and -0513 the 2nd number in the queue? My experience is that phone number queues don't "wrap around"...this works fine as long as people don't dial numbers further up the queue ...but features like "call back" break this assumption.
I have been dialing the second number because the first modem seemed to be bad. Has someone replaced it?
Re resp:308: That's the way it works on our phone system at work. A number "lower" in the hunt group will work its way up to "higher" numbers, but if it reaches the top it doesn't try from the bottom again; you just get a busy signal.
I get a permission error when trying to access http://grex.org/cgi-bin/wnu
The login screen has said for weeks that newuser is temporarily disabled, and that the staff is still working on restoring some accounts. How many accounts are still being restored? How long until newuser will be turned back on? Thanks!
Thanks, jep !
That we know of there is only one staff member left on Grex who has the skills to work through this issue. That's STeve. STeve knows about the problem. I have to assume his life is very busy or he'd be working on it. There is no estimate on when this will be fixed.
The following is not to put pressure on STeve. But despite my own level of "eh" re: newuser being shut off, it's not very tenable that grex, with its stated mission, a) should be running for an extended period of time with newuser down, and b) should have only *ONE* staffer able to address the situation.
Perhaps Cyberspace should dissolve itself.
Perhaps we need more volunteer sysadmins?
If it dissolved itself, would that really be a "solution"? ;-)
It's a lot easier to be provocative than to find reasonable solutions.
i volunteer.
resp:315 as it happens, I agree with you. I cant think of any good solutions though. I dont personally have the time to learn how to fix grex's issue myself. I dont know anyone else who might have the skills and who would be willing to help out. I wish I did.
Yeah, identifying the problem in this case is easier than fixing it. Grex's staff has been very exclusive and non-trusting of other users. It's worked pretty well in the past, but now that they're losing interest and dropping off in activity level, there are no replacements and no method for bringing in any new staff members. It might be a good idea for the Board to put some serious thought into the matter and formulate a plan of some kind. I know the idea has been mentioned in coop before, but nothing came of it. Mdw and valerie are gone, janc and steve are about half here (with amazing bursts of energy at times), i just keeps cranking along invisibly but isn't participating in conferences much any more. With all due respect for all of these people, they don't seem like active users in Grex's current environment. It's harder to imagine any of them returning to active participation than just going away. When they do, or at least if they do, who runs Grex?
I think there are some important questions that deserves to be mentioned, like, why should a qualified person want to volunteer their time for Grex? Is the sense of community persuasive enought to be worth the effort? Is the time donated appreciated? Do they like the people that will benefit from their generosity? Is Grex a fun place worthy of support? It may not be the fault of the staff and potential volunteer that we're in this pickle.
Mary has a good point. Anyone doing a simple cost/benefit analysis of being root staff of grex would be have to be either crazy to do it, or they'd very likely have some kind of agenda. In either case, they're not very attractive candidates for the job. That leaves only those who are really interested in the job, or at least in the skills that having the job will help develop (like a healthy insensitivity to harsh and worthless criticism).
From looking at http://www.grex.org/staffnote/, one would get the impression that Grex is overflowing with staff members. And this might discourage people from volunteering. Perhaps we can trim this list? Re: 323 and 324, We all understand Grex Board's reluctance to just hand over the keys to someone they don't know. This is why it is necessary to constantly bring in new volunteers, people who gradually are trusted with more of the system. But that doesn't seem to be happening. How many people on the list of Grex staff started working as staff in the past 2 years?
That list is out of date. Current staff, as I know it: steve (STeve Andre) kip (Kip deGraff) gelinas (Joe Gelinas) i (Walter Cramer) cross (Dan Cross) spooked (Michelangelo Giansiracusa) arthurp (Charles Mitchell) remmers (John Remmers) mdw (Marcus Watts) srw (Steve Weiss) janc (Jan Wolter) Of those eleven, three have are new to staff within the past two years. I hope I haven't missed anyone.
How many of these can fix newuser?
If grex cannot fulfill its mission - which necessarily means having a working newuser - then it has no business asking for donations to support that mission. The board must realize this as being part of its responsibility to address. If everyone is weary of grex for one reason or another, then fine, turn off its nonexempt / charitible status, and turn it into a private club, one which may or may not work at any particular time, depending on whether or not anyone feels like addressing any problems which may crop up. Call a spade a spade! (this really belongs in coop, I know)
Re resp:317: My understanding is you don't volunteer, you get invited. Re resp:322: Given the beatings staff takes in the conferences, if I were a staff member I'd probably avoid them, too.
I'm getting backtalk errors when I try to erase or hide a response
This response has been erased.
Mary, how many of your list are actively working on anything for Grex? Loginids kip and mdw haven't logged in since February so I assume they are "staff emeritus". I am not familiar with the activities of the staff in general. I am only aware of actions by i, steve and janc in the last 3 months. I thought cross had resigned from staff, but if he's active, that's great. I don't want to blame anyone for anything. The staff has done a terrific job for years, and so has the Board. I do want to suggest that, if the staff members we have can't keep Grex running, then something needs to be done. Maybe Grex can ask for volunteers from the users. The newuser program is critical to Grex. I suggest it's important enough to the survival of Grex that it's worth changing Grex's time honored practices in order to get it working.
That I know of there are only a couple of people on that list that know the software well enough to fix newuser. And one of them is pretty much not around. I'm wondering, again, if it isn't time to drop PicoSpan and our newuser program and go to Backtalk and Frontalk entirely. Now, I'm talking out of ignorance here that Backtalk even has some type of an account setup procedure that would allow us to dump newuser. But if so, it may make sense. I know Jan has Backtalk working elsewhere on the web, what do those systems use for account maintenance? I'm very anxious to get newuser running. Even without some of the damaged accounts restored. At least those affected would be able to setup new accounts and again participate. We really, really must make it a priority to not be using software or hardware that is owned or configured in such a way that only one or two people can dig us out if there are problems.
re 322 You're making yourself invisible by having your responses deleted. oops
This response has been erased.
I think grex is nearly perfect the way it is, apart from the broken newuser and an occasional crash.
After speaking with John this evening, about the newuser program, I realize I really don't know enough about it to suggest changes. Moving to Backtalk we'd still need newuser. It's not there just for Picospan. I'm learning.
As to Dan's comments - I'm sorry you're feeling so burned on Grex. I'm worried and looking to improve things, which I guess means I'm not burned. I've been here from day one and we're not big on fast changes, that's for sure, but we are big on being a user run system, where things happen by consensus, if at all. And we're an open system where anyone who finds us gets to act out in ways they couldn't in grade school. And we don't have much money. And we depend on voluteers to keep the wheels spinning. I consider it sheer magic we've lasted this long. Wow. Think about it. I'm also pretty darn good at hanging in there with problems rather than throwing up my hands and walking away. Someday, Grex will end. Yep. It will. But I'm hoping it's not for a while yet. So, my next project: Lighting a Fire Under STeve. I plan to call him and explain how Grex is at his mercy. I'll offer to take him to Zing's for dinner. Shameless manipulation. Wish me luck.
This response has been erased.
I enjoy reading cross' GreXsoft item in the garage conference. Everyone should check it out.
Good luck, Mary. Let me give a little of my perspective on what Dan was talking about, and how it conflicts with what Mary was talking about in resp:338. Mary said Grex is run by the users. It is, to a point, but the users are given the level of consent allowed to them by a very small and select group. Mary is "in". Jan is "in", and Marcus, STeve, Valerie, John Remmers, and as many as several others, but certainly no more than several. That group makes all of the decisions about the staff, and all of the real decisions about how Grex is going to be run. It always dominates the Board and always has, and it always will. It's the group recognized by the peripheral users like myself as the group which "gets it" about how Grex is supposed to run. If any of the peripheral users didn't agree with that group, they would go away (and this has happened), because it's just not worth it to push anything against that group. When the in group stuck with STeve about SunOs for an extra decade, then it was dang well written in stone that Grex was going to be on SunOs. When that group finally conceded it was plain unreasonable to keep running on SunOs, it took 3 more years to get onto PC hardware. I've been rooting for cross to gain influence and bring some new ideas into the staff for years... something like 5 years I think. He has fought and clawed and scratched and beaten people up to edge his way into having some say for all of that time (from my peripheral perspective) and now he says he's worn out. It is *hard* to break into that circle, if it's possible at all, and it's not worth it for anyone but a fanatic. But the "in" group is anti-fanatic, too. Aruba entered it, and maybe srw could have. So I guess there's a way but it seems pretty dang rare to me and I'm not sure it's possible any more. It's been fine, the "in" group has done a fine job of keeping things usable and comfortable for everyone else. It's not a tyrannical group at all, as long as you don't oppose any of it's core principles such as the technical infallability of mdw and steve. But now the "in" group is shrinking and moving on to other things. I already referred to mdw and valerie abandoning Grex, and others being less interested. I don't blame them; everyone changes over time, but there's no one around and acceptable to take their place. Given an unexpandable core but one which can diminish, and it's inevitable that an organization is going to fade in time. M-Net's entire core vanished, then the peripheral group collapsed and formed a new core, then that vanished, too. The result can be seen. (M-Net has 6 eligible voters, and didn't manage to have an election in April as required by the by-laws.) There but for the grace of <insert deity here> goes Grex. Grex needs to bulk up it's core, but the "in" group here has as one of it's very highest principles than no one else "gets it". The silent majority of us peripheral users support their belief, too.
jep, you are one messed-up guy. M-net has several very fine and talented staff members who actually enjoy keeping the system running.
it'd be nice if we could post edit our posts....I made a boo-boo :O
STeve is working on it as he has time. He is having a real time crunch at work with many machines there acting up, budget time for purchase of new machines with their installation problems (and what looks like a bad batch of Dells). When choosing between the paying job and volunteer Grex to spend limited time and energy on, I'm sorry, but the paying job has to win. Especially this summer when my job gets dropped from 20 hrs/wk during the semester to just 4 wks of work from May through September.
This response has been erased.
Anyone doing a simple cost/benefit analysis of being root staff of grex would be have to be either crazy to do it, or they'd very likely have some kind of agenda. Anyone who doesn't have an agenda is probably not the kind of person you want to have around when the going gets tough. That happens a LOT in system administration - on any platform you care to name.
Re resp:345: Well, information hiding is one way an "in group" stays exclusive. Information is power in any organization.
re 344 That means you can start cooking at home ! :-0
The old argument of "anyone who wants to be {root,ircop,sysop,admin} just
wants it for the power, or to further their agenda, otherwise, they wouldn't
want to be {root,ircop,sysop,admin}" has been used for decades to discourage
people from volunteering their time to improve a system.
I mean, am I the only one who was somewhat offended that when people started
suggesting that we need more volunteers that the response was that the user's
were to blame because of how staff is treated in BBS.
Which, by the way, I don't buy for a second. After system crashes, there is
usually an outpouring of gratitude and support from the users. Save for a few
trolls here and there, people generally support the staff.
re #344 Thanks for the status update. I can certainly sympathize. Best of luck to STeve.
Would STeve be willing to have some staff apprentices work with him?
How about Grex call out for people who are willing to volunteer to help out with the system. These volunteers can list their abilities, things they are good at. Then you take that, create a skills matrix, and assign projects; problems; etc. to teams of people with the skills applicable to that project; problem; etc. Then all Steve would really need to do is make sure things get down, and are routed to the appropriate teams.
re #352 But that sounds like WORK! :(
Glenda, could STeve show you how to help with this during the period when you are not working?
Re: #349. Nate, you're right. To be fair, not all the sysadmins on Grex blame the users. For various reasons, some of them unrelated to their capacities as sysadmin, I've suspected for quite a while that some of those who do have a generalized attitude problem.
re resp:351: In fairness to the staff members such as STeve, training someone else to do a job is hard. If he doesn't have time to fix newuser, he probably doesn't have time to teach someone else how to fix it.
Grex needs to bulk up it's core, but the "in" group here has as one of it's very highest principles than no one else "gets it". The silent majority of us peripheral users support their belief, too. Grex needs to bulk up it's core, but the "in" group here has as one of it's very highest principles than no one else "gets it". The silent majority of us peripheral users support their belief, too. If that's true, which it very well may be, then it's the "in group" that need to "get it". Many of our most regular users (myself included) have some level of UN*X expertise. Many more of them, perhaps excluding only the trolls, subscribe to some version of our "philosophy". Indeed, iirc, complaints about the (perceived or real) abuse of the system or its principles have, when specific, usually come from the users and been directed at staff, not the other way around; other staff have also either kept silent on the issue or defended the target(s) of the complaints. It's easier to inculcate technical expertise than philosophy. Perhaps none of those outside the "in group" have the expertise to hack on a binary-only copy of newuser, but given that those who do won't last forever (for whatever reason), who cares? It may be time to start replacing our proprietary sw with open-source versions, or at least with versions which have source code open, but only to staff. The more sysadmins we have, the more time they will collectively be able to spend on projects like this. If staff want more colleagues, and they don't accept that people who might have the ability to join them might not know Grex inside out but can be shown the ropes, and that their expertise can grow over time (they can learn by doing), they are going to *have* to accept it. If not, I can only hope, that those users who care revolt, and set up their own system, a la Grex, just like what happened in the early nineties to M-Net. I don't know if there's enough momentum for that to happen, though.
re #357 revolt, and set up their own system, a la Grex, just like what happened in the early nineties to M-Net. I think you got it backwards. There is too much apathy and ego invested here for skilled volunteers to "step on toes" I mean..."get trained" by existing staff.
Re #356: that's a recipe for nothing ever getting fixed when current staff fades away. But I don't believe it. I suspect there are quite a few members that need only know what the fault is, and could look at the code and fix it. OK - ask them to do a "beta" fix, and STeve can check it out and test it, before installation. But things would move forward - and some new people would learn how Grex software works.
I bet Mike McNally could fix newuser without too much tutorial on where it is and operates but you don't see anyone welcoming him with open arms. It's a shame more folks aren't invited to volunteer because the qualifications aren't THAT specialized.
mike doesnt have the proper level of aspberger's syndrome to fit into that role.
If you don't show up for the Grex Trundle and Trough-off then you're not trustworthy.
Is this the part where we're being nice to staff?
re resp:363: I see offers of help, and tod and happyboy being irrelevantly trivial which is normal for them. What do you think would help?
you just responded to yourself, nerse ratchet
would you trust a gay man with your children ? would you trust TWENEX with your COMPUTER ?!
re #363 WHAT staff? Why is it staff that has the authority to decide who can volunteer and who can't? Why doesn't the BoD step up to the plate and make some management decisions instead of letting things drag on over and over?
The board has always been of the opinion that we're not going to micro- manage staff. That has worked pretty well in the past. We've encouraged, asked what we could do to help, and facilitated as we could. Staff, on the other hand, has, for the most part, never trucked off on their own without consulting with the board and the membership on important issues. It's been teamwork. Every once of people skills I own is telling me now is not the time to change that policy. You may disagree. You may want to run for the board next time around, stating that's how you'd do business, and see how it goes.
s/ounce/once
I understand not wanting a barn full of admins running amok and fscking up the system but what if the opposite is happening and the barn is empty? Right now, newuser is defunct. There is "one" staff person that everyone is aware of that can fix it. That "one" staff person is tight on time and has had health concerns. Is that how you want to do business with Grex?
> You may want to run for the board next time around, stating that's how > you'd do business, and see how it goes. Ancient chinese proverb speaks of being carefull of what one wishes for.
STeve is working on the problem, he just called to ask me if I needed the car tomorrow so that he can work on it tonight for as long as it takes to get it done. Even if it means he misses his ride to get enough sleep to be useful at work and has to drive himself in tomorrow. He is sorry for not getting it done sooner. He will also be showing me how to do such things so that I can help more in the future. (Mary missed me on the staff list.)
This is a good beginning for the immediate problem, but it seems there is still need for a longer range solution, which is the development of additional volunteer staff members.
Indeed, more are needed. I am getting the data right now to finish the fixing of master.passwd.
When exactly did newuser go fubar? Was it coincident with going to the new system? Was it coincident with moving into the co-lo?
I believe it had something to do with a drive going bad, and the password file being messed up.
This response has been erased.
I have a feeling that both glenda and steve would agree that it isnt fair to dump everything in their lap. I am sure they will correct me if I am wrong. I agree that the lack of staff is a board issue. I am not sure exactly what the solution is here. I want to make people feel welcomed enough to feel that they can volunteer to be on staff without being in some sort of in-crowd. I want the staff to let those people who volunteer do things. Part of the problem, as I see it, is security. The staff tend to allow people they know onto staff because those are the people they know they can trust. It is true that the best way to become staff on grex is to be invited. It is an "in crowd" on staff. On the board too I suppose although it is probably easier to get on the board than it is to get onto staff. I really dont know what the best solution is though. We could always double the staff's pay ;)
Re #375: Drew - the problems with newuser are more recent than either the move or the change to NewGrex. jep's assessment of the staff situation in #342 (I think) was pretty accurate a couple of years ago. But we definitely passed the point where the board felt it was a good idea to depend on STeve and Marcus to fix things. A few years ago we acquired 3 or 4 new staff members, and we really hoped that would solve the problem. Unfortunately, for various reasons, we're largely back where we were. When this latest crisis came up, for instance, no one but STeve stepped up to work on it, and then he got it half fixed and moved on to other crises, leaving Grex in limbo. We certainly need more staff, and it's certainly true that there have been many barriers to getting onto the staff. We need a procedure for giving potential staff members some responsibility to see how they do, then "promoting" them if they do well. But the board/staff also needs the discretion to ignore applications from people who are clearly just trying to cause trouble. There's a needle to be thread there.
(Lynne slipped in.)
Re #354: Because Glenda is burned out from almost 6 years of intensive computer classes and needs a break, that is one of the reasons she is not working regular classes, just the 4 one week long special sessions this summer. She is going to spend most of her time working on the organizing the house, get her spinning wheels and looms up and working, stitching, beading, and other general crafting, and reading fiction and crafting books. The most technical reading will be SciFi (my favorite genre). The only real computer work I am planning on doing is building the computer that I have had components for since just before the emergency surgery in December 2004. It is a 64 bit processor machine with a minimum of 250G hard drive (maybe more), a gig of memory and will run OpenBsd as main OS, Net and Free BSDs and SuSe to play with, haven't decided whether it will have a small windows area or not. Some of my needlework, weaving, and beading software only runs on windows since most of the people using it aren't really computer literate and only use windows.
Right, because computer literacy is defined by Unix.
In regards Cross's comment in #377- it does seem that more information needs to be shared between current staff members. It's hard for other staffers to help when the only one that knows isn't sharing info. I've seen Cross ask several times, in this item, for more information on what's wrong so he (or someone else can help) but haven't seen ANY indication that STeve (or glenda) is sharing any of that. Maybe this is happening in staff e-mail, but I would think that if it was Cross wouldn't be here repeatedly asking for more info. Right now I'm one of those people that can telnet in to my account but can't access the mooncat account via Backtalk (which makes me glad I created this account on a whim a few months ago).
It was a lot easier for me to write my perspective about how Grex is limited by lack of trust than it is to overcome that limitation. I think resp:379 is part of the right approach for bringing in additional volunteers to the staff. There's also a need for some sort of training procedure to bring new staffers up to speed with the philosophy and practices of the staff. That will require time and effort from someone on the staff. It's also going to require patience and flexibility from the staff and all of Grex, because new people coming in are going to have their own ways of doing things. It's not fair to expect them to suppress their personalities and the techniques they have used in the past in other contexts to volunteer for the staff of Grex. They do have to fit into the team which exists, but the team has to adjust, too. In the short term, it's easier for the existing staff to just do things themselves to get by, but right now it seems apparent the short term doesn't last forever.
Hear, hear.
has steVE still not told cross what is wrong ?! i believe cross is available to fix.
Cross is not in the Burns Family "circle of trust" I've got my EYES on you, Focker. ;)
that movie was OK, but got kind of tiresome, i think
Sorry I missed you on staff, Glenda, and thanks for the correction. Did I miss anyone else? And a huge thanks to STeve for looking at the newuser problem last night. Is there an update? Is newuser back on?
thanks, huge mary !
Don't call her huge, looni Jim
whoops, big slip :( sorry, mary !
Re 389: Not yet, still working on it. Putting an item in Agora asking STeve for information doesn't work. He hasn't read Agora in years unless I tell him of an item he should look at. I forget more items in Agora than I read, so I don't always see them either. I also heavily filter what/who I read just so that I can keep up. About the only CF that STeve reads is staff, and I am not sure how often he gets there.
That's good to hear! Right, Mary?
I sure hope steVE reads the system problems' item. oh wait; that's THIS item.
... ???? mdw is gone? huh?!
May I have permission to just *look*
at the source code for newuser?
I can take "no" for an answer.
Where is it?
/grex/grexdoc/newuser
Newuser was working just before the disk went bad, was it not? My guess is that it isn't the code itself that's broken, but one or more data files that newuser depends on. What exactly happens if you put newuser online and have someone run it?
I've updated the staff list at http://www.grex.org/staffnote/
thanks, joe!
thanks, scholar !
grex% ls -las /grex/grexdoc/newuser total 36 2 drwxrwxr-x 7 root staff 1024 Jan 18 2004 . 2 drwxr-xr-x 31 root staff 1024 Jan 3 13:13 .. 4 -rw-r--r-- 1 root staff 1396 Jan 18 2004 00-account 2 -rw-rw-r-- 1 root staff 164 Dec 27 2003 01-newuser 2 -rw-rw-r-- 1 root staff 160 Dec 30 2003 02-wnu 2 drwxrwxr-x 2 root staff 512 Oct 14 2004 CVS 2 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root staff 45 Dec 28 2003 build_newuser 2 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root staff 65 Dec 29 2003 build_wnu 2 drwxr-xr-x 3 root staff 512 Jan 3 17:29 datafiles 2 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root staff 684 Oct 14 2004 install_newuser 2 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root staff 367 Dec 30 2003 install_wnu 4 drwxr-xr-x 3 root staff 1536 Oct 16 2004 nu 4 drwxr-xr-x 3 root staff 1536 Dec 28 2003 src 4 drwxr-xr-x 3 root staff 1536 Oct 17 2004 wnu
BTW, if newuser doesn't run properly due to munged data, then it is deficient. (yes, yes, there are limits on what one can expect any program to do when it is asked to work with bad data)
/a: write failed, file system is full Got error 28 (No space left on device) in buffer write
por jor
Is it time to remove the 'grex was down from April 26 to April 29' message or is this meant to show how long we have been up since then?
I took it upon myself to do so.
thanks, russ !
Looks like /a is full.
/a is full again.
Jesus H christ, can someone make more room on /a, what ever happened to the 3 month reaper?
/a whatchit
get a home directory on /c, dipshits
Shaddup shuttin' up, or I'll give ya a fat lip!
re #414 hey assclown, I would if it weren't for the fact that newuser is also in a state of disrepair.
"is this the humor item?"
Simple suggestion for clearing some space on /a:
find /a -mtime +3 -name .pine_debug\? -exec rm \{\} \;
(for the non-Unixy people, that command will find all of
the files named .pine-debug? (where ? is a wildcard that
matches a single character) that have been more than three
days since they were last modified, and remove them.)
My search to find out how much space they're taking
shows they're still taking rather a lot of space.
grex% find . -name .pine-debug\* -ls | ~/pdb_total.pl
7521 files
87279280 bytes
That's 87,000,000 bytes of space that's being wasted by
stuff that nobody will ever look at or ever miss.. In terms
of modern disks that's not huge but hey, 87MB here, 100MB
there, pretty soon it adds up..
cat | butter | toast > feet
re 416 i forgot about newuser being broken. oops ! get the GreX stafferz to give you a home directory on /c
login banner mentions item 28
load averages: 2.40, 2.06, 1.89 16:29:02 94 processes: 2 running, 88 idle, 4 stopped CPU states: 71.5% user, 0.0% nice, 28.5% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle Memory: Real: 198M/340M act/tot Free: 1170M Swap: 0K/3072M used/tot PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE WAIT TIME CPU COMMAND 25988 leemak 64 0 280K 912K run - 21:08 92.97% warcaby 5250 _mysql 2 0 34M 16M sleep poll 16:06 0.00% mysqld
The reaper was to be replaced by an automated process. I should check to see if the one we were using got moved over.
/a out of disk space again. I removed some files to clear enough disk space to enter this response but it'll be out again in no time flat.
/c :)
!last -2 keesan keesan tty01 Wed Jun 15 22:24 still logged in keesan ttyp9 pm918-21.dialip.mich.net Wed Jun 15 19:18 - 19:27 (00:09) !!!!
????
I REALLY HATE IT when my agora conf. participation file gets stomped when the idle zapper gets me when I'm sitting in bbs at agora!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Maybe you shouldn't idle?
Han Solo: "Even I get boarded sometimes."
re #428: I lost a near-finished nethack game to the idle zapper earlier. D'oh!
the GreX idle zapper should take jor's model and knock you off after an hour, not twenty minutes
And hey. Mine is configurable during run time,
you don't even have to stop it and start it
to alter the settings.
Plus it's one tenth the souce code of idled.c,
ready for efficient customization.
www.arbornet.org/~jor/id2002.htm
This response has been erased.
jor is the ID man
paedophile
Telegram from nharmon on ttyp2 at 22:56 EDT ... What if I was to kick the ever loving shit out of you? EOF (nharmon) "if I were to"
"is this the humor item?"
i'm not klg :(
I get an "Abort Trap" message from Picospan when I try to read agora item 174.
Looks like response 4 of that item has a long line, and either less or my twitfilter is having a hard time dealing with it. Does anyone else have a problem seeing response 4 of item 174?
I have no trouble seeing it using Picospan with "more -d" as my pager.
Looks like it's my twit filter. The response has a line of length 316 characters. I bet OldGrex enforced a 256 character limit on line length, and that's why I've never seen the error before.
Drift: How did you determine that line length?
He counted using fubgrs *and* toes.
Or by using a text editor, writing to
a file, and ls -l.
High tech.
stuff you'd expect from a treasure.r.
fingers
Re #444: I downloaded the file /bbs/agora53/_174 and looked at it in a text editor.
fubgrs, ur smart, aruba.,
It's been summer for 8 hours and 41 minutes
Correction. It has now been summer for 8 hours and 49 minutes.
http://www.archaeoastronomy.com/2005.shtml
Wikipedia says the summer solstice marks MIDsummer.
Isn't the Wikipedia that online font of misinformation?
what ! what's wrong with wikipedia ?
midsummer is six weeks away.
Right - for some reason, the first day of summer is sometimes called "midsummer's day".
Summer used to be defined differently, as the 1/4 of the year surrounding the solstice, when the days were longest. Similarly for winter.
You have several choices: