Grex Helpers Conference

Item 134: Grex System Problems - Summer 2004

Entered by i on Tue Jun 22 02:27:23 2004:

23 new of 286 responses total.


#264 of 286 by dpc on Tue Sep 21 13:18:00 2004:

What Rane said.


#265 of 286 by bru on Tue Sep 21 13:32:36 2004:

I tried dialing in today and got an error.


#266 of 286 by keesan on Tue Sep 21 16:18:50 2004:

Someone that I send an email to complained they never got it.  I sent it again
today directly, and also forwarded via another shell account.  They just wrote
back that they got the SECOND mail.  Is grex on Spamcop's blacklist again?

I got connected dialin after the usual wait.  I tend to go wash dishes.

I hope that the new Grex has a version of Pine that can handle HTML (with
lynx).  A  friend of mine using grex for email has an ISP account specifically
to forward her html emails to because she cannot figure out how to deal with
them here.  It expires in November.  


#267 of 286 by aruba on Tue Sep 21 17:16:42 2004:

Thanks, Walter, for cycling the modem.


#268 of 286 by mary on Tue Sep 21 22:34:14 2004:

I'm not sure if this was announced somewhere or not, but folks should be
aware that if they have any files in their directories they'd mind
losing, they should get them off Grex or at least have a safe backup
stored elsewhere.  The partition with user directories hasn't been
successfully backed up since sometime in 2003.  And STeve thinks this
might be our next disk to fail. 

If I got that wrong, someone with more information please set the
record straight.  


#269 of 286 by slynne on Wed Sep 22 02:07:08 2004:

Thanks for the reminder, Mary


#270 of 286 by tod on Wed Sep 22 17:12:06 2004:

Would someone on staff please respond to item 196 in the coop cf? Thanks!


#271 of 286 by albaugh on Wed Sep 22 18:03:45 2004:

Are there any prospects for user partition backups any time soon?


#272 of 286 by gull on Wed Sep 22 19:36:36 2004:

I think Grex's policy has always been that the user partition is not
backed up on any regular basis.  As long as I've been here there have
been warnings not to store anything too important there.

It doesn't take too long to tar up all your files and then use FTP or
SCP to copy them to your home machine.


#273 of 286 by rcurl on Wed Sep 22 19:44:56 2004:

I'd like some help in doing that. I can do it file by file, but can I just
compress and download my whole directory, and open it as needed on my
home Mac (OS X)? If so, how (e-mail me, if it convenient). 


#274 of 286 by gull on Wed Sep 22 20:01:08 2004:

I'll post it here, so that other people can benefit, too.

To get all your files into one tarball:

Change to your home directory and type 
   tar cvf mystuff.tar .

If you then want to compress it, type
   gzip mystuff.tar
and you'll end up with a file called mystuff.tar.gz.

I'm not sure what the best utility to open this on OS X would be, though
I bet you can extract it in a terminal with
   tar xvzf mystuff.tar.gz
but if you want a GUI solution, something like StuffIt may work.


#275 of 286 by gull on Wed Sep 22 20:02:05 2004:

(Incidentally, I should probably point out that there's a period on the
end of that first command line.  Don't forget it; it's there to indicate
you want everything in the current directory.)


#276 of 286 by keesan on Wed Sep 22 20:13:35 2004:

How about tar zcvf to produce .tar.gz ?
When I telnet here with Kermit it gives me some helpful hints about what is
taking so long:  The Telnet server is not sending required responses:

WILL TERMINAL-TYPE
WILL NAWS
WILL NEW-ENVIRONMENT
WILL COM-PORT-CONTROL

Does this mean there is a software problem at grex?


#277 of 286 by mcnally on Wed Sep 22 20:48:08 2004:

 re #274: 

 > Change to your home directory and type 
 >  tar cvf mystuff.tar .

 What happens when the tar command tries to add ./mystuff.tar to 
 the archive it's building in ./mystuff.tar?

 Another problem (well, not really a *problem*, but potential
 complication is that when files are extracted from the mystuff.tar
 file they'll be dumped unceremoniously into the directory where
 the tar extract command is run.  You ought to either tell the
 user to extract in a fresh directory or else back up a level before
 building the tar file, e.g.

    cd ~/..; tar cvzf /tmp/grex_homedir_$USER.tar.gz $USER

 (in most shells, anyway..)


#278 of 286 by mcnally on Wed Sep 22 20:50:54 2004:

  Also, while tar is the most convenient archive utility for most
  Unix users, PC and Mac afficionados may find zip to be more useful
  for them (Mac users can unpack zip archives using UnStuffIt; I'm
  not sure how well it handles gzipped or bzipped tar files.)


#279 of 286 by tod on Wed Sep 22 20:52:46 2004:

tar is nicer because it retains the perms info


#280 of 286 by mcnally on Wed Sep 22 21:36:49 2004:

  I agree that tar is the way to go if you're going to be extracting
  under Unix or a Unix-like system..


#281 of 286 by mcnally on Wed Sep 22 21:39:42 2004:

re #276:

> When I telnet here with Kermit it gives me some helpful hints about what is
> taking so long:  The Telnet server is not sending required responses:
> 
> WILL TERMINAL-TYPE
> WILL NAWS
> WILL NEW-ENVIRONMENT
> WILL COM-PORT-CONTROL

  Based on other investigation I doubt it's a telnet- or telnet-and-ssh-
  specific problem.  The same 79 second delay seems to affect outgoing
  SMTP connections, too, for example.

> Does this mean there is a software problem at grex?

  It's definitely a configuration problem or software error of some sort.


#282 of 286 by tod on Wed Sep 22 21:50:33 2004:

Something in inetd perhaps?


#283 of 286 by gelinas on Thu Sep 23 02:43:02 2004:

No promises, but it looks like I'll have some time on Friday to attempt
a back-up of grex.  I hope folks can stand losing it for a day during
the week.  ;/


#284 of 286 by rcurl on Thu Sep 23 06:43:52 2004:

From my reading of recent responses, there seems to be some questions, or
suggestions, inre what gull said in #274. What should I take as the
current consensus inre my ? in #273? 



#285 of 286 by gull on Thu Sep 23 13:13:00 2004:

Re resp:277: The version of tar that Grex has is smart enough not to add
the archive it's creating to itself...as long as you *don't* use the z
flag.  That's why I didn't use it as was suggested in resp:276.  I
thought about telling people to create the tar file in the /tmp
directory, but I didn't for two reasons:  There's not much room in /tmp,
and people would inevitably leave the file lying around there where
anyone can read it.  I agree with your other comments.

Re resp:284: Any of the suggestions that have been given will work. 
There's More Than One Way To Do It(tm).


#286 of 286 by naftee on Fri Sep 24 06:24:42 2004:

Fronttalk from m-net works well


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: