Grex Helpers Conference

Item 130: Grex System Problems - Winter 2003/2004

Entered by i on Wed Dec 24 02:24:24 2003:

320 new of 384 responses total.


#65 of 384 by janc on Tue Jan 6 03:13:53 2004:

Oh, in case you haven't heard it mentioned, Grex staff does not advise storing
any irreplacable data on Grex.


#66 of 384 by albaugh on Tue Jan 6 05:53:21 2004:

Regardless of all discussion issues, OUTSTANDING JOB!!! for merge-restoring
old e-mail with new.  Re: e-mail inboxes, I guess that forewarned is forearmed
(forlegged? ;-).  This should probably be pointed out prominently in newuser
and elsewhere, if not already.
(i.e. GREX MAKES NO GUARANTEES ABOUT STABLE LONGEVITY OF E-MAIL or some such)


#67 of 384 by kip on Tue Jan 6 06:05:44 2004:

Okay, earlier this evening, we were able to restore all the mail from the old
disk and preprend to any mail you may have received since the disk trouble.

So while we make no guarantees, we certainly do make the effort.  :)

Thanks again to Jan, who was up most of the night Sunday.  I got the easy
shift tonight restoring the mail spool.  It's only a little after 1am and I'm
home already.



#68 of 384 by richard on Tue Jan 6 06:09:13 2004:

thanks kip


#69 of 384 by charcat on Tue Jan 6 09:10:58 2004:

Once again I give a well done to the fixers and keepers of grex!


#70 of 384 by twenex on Tue Jan 6 09:12:13 2004:

Well done!


#71 of 384 by mary on Tue Jan 6 13:11:34 2004:

Thank you, Jan and Kip for pulling night shift to keep
mail flowing.  Very generous of you both.


#72 of 384 by davel on Tue Jan 6 13:48:39 2004:

Um.  WOW.  Kip, that is amazing, besides being an awful lot of work.
Thank you very much.


#73 of 384 by cmcgee on Tue Jan 6 14:20:27 2004:

Staff on Grex is awesome!  Thanks folks for carrying enough about us to put
in that kind of effort.


#74 of 384 by aruba on Tue Jan 6 15:26:11 2004:

Indeed, I'm very impressed that Kip fixed the disk, and that Jan and Kip
spent so much time on this problem.  THanks very much!


#75 of 384 by gull on Tue Jan 6 15:40:45 2004:

Re resp:52: Neither your mail spool nor your home directory are
guaranteed to be backed up on a regular basis.  If you care about the
contents, copy them to your own computer.  I'm lax about doing that too,
but when I do I usually just tar everything up and then FTP it to my
home computer.

Re resp:67: Many thanks, kip, for resurrecting the disk. :>


#76 of 384 by slynne on Tue Jan 6 15:48:02 2004:

Yeah, staff here are awesome. Staying up all night for email! Wow. That 
is very much appreciated. 


#77 of 384 by tod on Tue Jan 6 16:50:22 2004:

This response has been erased.



#78 of 384 by rcurl on Tue Jan 6 17:27:15 2004:

Do  I understand correctly that it is only the INBOX that is not backed up,
but that other e-mail folders in ~/mail are?


#79 of 384 by ryan on Tue Jan 6 17:31:31 2004:

This response has been erased.



#80 of 384 by rcurl on Tue Jan 6 17:53:01 2004:

Yes, but is it backed-up?


#81 of 384 by ryan on Tue Jan 6 17:56:48 2004:

This response has been erased.



#82 of 384 by mcnally on Tue Jan 6 18:03:25 2004:

  re #78:  On most Unix systems, the basic storage unit for backups is 
  the disk partition.  When staff backs up the system, they probably use
  the Unix dump command to back up individual disk partitions.

  Your home directory, which contains ~/mail, is on one partition (e.g. /a)
  and incoming mail (your inbox) is on another (/var/spool/mail)

  To complicate matters further, the most usual unit of catastrophic disk
  failure is an entire hard drive, which can contain several partitions.
  Grex has six hard drives mounted at the current time, containing the 
  following filesystems:

    sd0:   /
           /usr
           /bbs 
           /x
           /oldbbs
    sd2:   /rootbak
           /suidbin
           /oldvar
           /tmp
           /s 
    sd4:   /c
    sd6:   /var
           /usr/local 
    sd7:   /d
           /var/spool/mail
    sd11:  /a

  I'm assuming this partitioning scheme (which doesn't make a whole lot
  of sense) grew up as the result of historical necessity and "if it ain't
  broke, don't fix it.."  I likewise assume that the partitioning on 
  nextgrex will be a little more organized.  In any case, that's a topic
  for another conversation..


#83 of 384 by mcnally on Tue Jan 6 18:08:02 2004:

  re #80:  it's best to presume that backups are not predictable
  or frequent, but occasional.  No matter what the backup policy
  on any system, I *always* advise people to do their own backups
  of information they consider important.  (and I don't just mean
  this policy to apply to volunteer-run systems like Grex.  take
  charge of your own data everywhere if it's important to you.)


#84 of 384 by mynxcat on Tue Jan 6 18:11:35 2004:

Getting past the technicalities, have I lost all the love-emails from 
my stalker? 


#85 of 384 by twenex on Tue Jan 6 18:13:08 2004:

Question, is Veritas/Vinum available for OpenBSD, and are we gfoing to use
it?


#86 of 384 by tod on Tue Jan 6 18:28:35 2004:

This response has been erased.



#87 of 384 by keesan on Tue Jan 6 18:55:03 2004:

are we still using the (repaired) dying disk for email or has it been
replaced?  Was it really dying or just in need of fixing.

It is lovely to get back all my mail through Jan 1. I should go through it
and copy down the parts I want to save, on paper.  I wrote someone who
probably sent me mail since then to try again.


#88 of 384 by twenex on Tue Jan 6 18:56:12 2004:

Sounds like the electronics failed, not the disk, and that the electronics
have been replaced and the disk is back in service.


#89 of 384 by gelinas on Tue Jan 6 19:11:09 2004:

The failed disk was replaced.  After repair, it was mounted long enough to
copy the data from it.  It does not seem to be mounted now.


#90 of 384 by anderyn on Tue Jan 6 19:31:55 2004:

This response has been erased.



#91 of 384 by gull on Tue Jan 6 19:38:33 2004:

Re resp:77: No one is stopping you from copying your email to somewhere
safe.  Your mailbox is simply a plain text file.  You can easily
transfer it to your home computer if you want to.


#92 of 384 by mynxcat on Tue Jan 6 20:03:13 2004:

RE 84> Oh goodie. Forward them so I can spend valuable time deleting 
them one at a time.


#93 of 384 by naftee on Tue Jan 6 21:41:58 2004:

re 86 Isn't the SENT folder a dumb Outlook Express idea?


#94 of 384 by albaugh on Tue Jan 6 21:48:21 2004:

Certainly Outlook and I assume Outlook Express *have* a Sent Items folder.
So do other e-mail systems (Juno, hotmail, yahoo).  I don't consider it a 
dumb idea.  At least with Outlook, you have the ability to specify (and set
as an option) whether or not sent messages get saved in the Sent Items folder.


#95 of 384 by naftee on Tue Jan 6 22:09:46 2004:

Whoops, I was thinking of the outbox.  Mybad.


#96 of 384 by willcome on Tue Jan 6 22:25:16 2004:

lol


#97 of 384 by cross on Tue Jan 6 23:20:05 2004:

This response has been erased.



#98 of 384 by gull on Wed Jan 7 00:10:38 2004:

Re resp:95: An 'outbox' (or similar structure) is necessary for any mail
client that has an offline mode.  Where else would you queue up sent
messages that can't be transmitted yet?

Re resp:97: I think a better argument, in Grex's case, is there's no
convenient way to back up the mail spool often enough to matter.  People
aren't really *supposed* to let old mail linger there anyway, so any
data in the mail spool ought to be transient.  It'd be like backing up /tmp.


#99 of 384 by mynxcat on Wed Jan 7 01:04:50 2004:

Re 97> Eh, no biggie. Just this person who sent me long emails and said I was
second on his list to marry (yeah, I was flattered :P). Petered off when he
said he couldn't continue corresponding if I didn't answer. I'm not
complaining. :)


#100 of 384 by naftee on Wed Jan 7 03:24:46 2004:

re 98 Ahh, I see.


#101 of 384 by cross on Wed Jan 7 05:22:15 2004:

This response has been erased.



#102 of 384 by mcnally on Wed Jan 7 06:45:17 2004:

  re #101:  

  > The legal argument was the best I heard
  > for keeping it seperate, but like I said, I don't buy it.

  You might really be surprised how time consuming it can be satisfying
  a subpoena, summons to produce records, or other type of court process.

  > The argument then shifts to one of space and quotas, but on
  > nextgrex we'll be using normal UFS quotas anyway, which would negate
  > that problem for the most part.  Then the argument shifts to not
  > wanting to use Unix quotas for mail, since the mail still has to
  > be transfered to grex and bounced; it can't just be rejected during
  > the SMTP transaction.  However, looking at the logs, one sees that
  > on any given day, only 5% of the mail grex deals with is rejected
  > due to the target mailbox being over quota.  It doesn't strike me
  > as worth it to augment the SMTP server with code to deal with quotas
  > just to save on 5% of the mail we go through in one day (particularly
  > given the amount of effort that goes into maintaining the result!).

  Among its many other virtues, the postfix MTA has a very simple-to-use
  feature to limit mailbox size (it's called something painfully obvious
  like inbox_size_limit or something like that..)  Are we sticking with
  sendmail on NextGrex or could we move to something just as capable but
  far easier to manage?


#103 of 384 by cross on Wed Jan 7 06:54:20 2004:

This response has been erased.



#104 of 384 by gelinas on Wed Jan 7 07:46:20 2004:

No subpoena ever written can get blood from a stone:  You cannot produce
what you do not have.  If you don't back up the mail spool, you don't have
back ups of the mail spool to produce.


#105 of 384 by davel on Wed Jan 7 13:37:28 2004:

Unless the mail software really does enforce mail quotas, we really don't want
mail files in the users' space.  Because someone sends me spam, I've exceeded
my disk quota?


#106 of 384 by janc on Wed Jan 7 15:16:27 2004:

I'm not sure, but I think that /newdum is the script that is used to do
backups on Grex.  It does not appear to back up the mail spool.  It also
does not appear to back up /s, which is where my home directory is.


#107 of 384 by cross on Wed Jan 7 17:44:52 2004:

This response has been erased.



#108 of 384 by scott on Wed Jan 7 17:50:05 2004:

We haven't backed up the mail spool in many years.


#109 of 384 by naftee on Wed Jan 7 20:40:18 2004:

Can this file please be mae world-readable?

-rw-------   1 cfadm    software    87783 Oct 29  2000 /bbs/errorlog1.gz


#110 of 384 by naftee on Wed Jan 7 20:40:42 2004:

mae==made


#111 of 384 by keesan on Wed Jan 7 21:08:05 2004:

I have not received any mail except for 2 spams since Jan 1.  I wrote three
friends asking them to send mail to keesan@grex.org.  I sent myself two mails
just now to grex.org and cyberspace.org (but not grex.cyberspace.org).  They
have not arrived.  Are other people getting non-spam mail from anywhere? I
usually get 5-10 emails a day from real people.


#112 of 384 by mcnally on Wed Jan 7 21:49:44 2004:

  I've been receiving mail from correspondents elsewhere normally all week.


#113 of 384 by willcome on Wed Jan 7 22:04:51 2004:

Yeah.  /bbs/errorlog's world readable.  Why shouldn't the previous version
be the same?


#114 of 384 by cmcgee on Thu Jan 8 01:17:30 2004:

I've been getting all kinds of mail myself.  No one I usually hear from has
failed to write, and no one else has reported problems.


#115 of 384 by keesan on Thu Jan 8 12:20:17 2004:

I still have not received the two mails I sent myself yesterday, or replies
from three friends, one of whom phoned and said all his mails to me were
bouncing.  I will try writing @grex.cyberspace.org.  So far no mail since Jan
1 except 2 spams.  I normally use @grex.org.  Mike and Colleen, to what
address are your mails arriving?  grex, cyberspace, or grex.cyberspace?


#116 of 384 by gelinas on Thu Jan 8 12:23:26 2004:

What is the error message in the rejection notices?  Knowing that would help
diagnose the problem.

If you like, ask him to send the rejections to you at another address, then
you can paste in the text from the rejection notice.


#117 of 384 by sholmes on Thu Jan 8 13:35:29 2004:

Once I had set  up my procmail wrongly , and it was rejecting all messages.
Just thought you might want to check that too.


#118 of 384 by davel on Thu Jan 8 13:45:39 2004:

Re 113 re 109 (talking to himself?):  Why should the error log be world
readable in the first place?


#119 of 384 by gull on Thu Jan 8 14:32:24 2004:

I've been getting mail normally from a couple mailing lists I'm on,
ebay, and any number of spammers.  I use "cyberspace.org" as the host
part of my address.

Maybe you should temporarily turn off procmail and make sure it's not
deleting your mail for you.


#120 of 384 by twenex on Thu Jan 8 15:15:55 2004:

At the risk of indulging in an exercise in futility, I'd like to not ethat
I keep getting items coming up which allegedly have new responses, but where
new responses are no-whee to be seen, and all i get is the title of the item
and the author.


#121 of 384 by jp2 on Thu Jan 8 15:27:29 2004:

This response has been erased.



#122 of 384 by twenex on Thu Jan 8 15:28:49 2004:

Thanks for the explanation, but that might need a little more explaining! ;-)


#123 of 384 by anderyn on Thu Jan 8 15:36:31 2004:

Valerie wrote a script before she left that allows one to scribble and
expurgate one's responses en masse. Apparently that causes the items where
one's done so  to come up new. 


#124 of 384 by twenex on Thu Jan 8 15:39:18 2004:

Ah, so that's what's happening. In that case, apologies to you, twila, for
the harsh tone in that other item.


#125 of 384 by jp2 on Thu Jan 8 15:47:34 2004:

This response has been erased.



#126 of 384 by twenex on Thu Jan 8 15:49:04 2004:

Well, well.


#127 of 384 by anderyn on Thu Jan 8 15:50:31 2004:

I should say, too, that I didn't plan on doing this in the current agora. I
am not leaving Grex, but was upset by all of the hoopla this week.


#128 of 384 by twenex on Thu Jan 8 15:51:16 2004:

Not surprising. :-(


#129 of 384 by kip on Thu Jan 8 15:55:10 2004:

This happens because when someone changes an item, it is considered as
something new.  Valerie ran a program that erased her responses to a number
of items and that counts as a change, thus all those items come up as having
new responses.


#130 of 384 by twenex on Thu Jan 8 15:56:22 2004:

Ah. thanks.


#131 of 384 by naftee on Thu Jan 8 16:23:39 2004:

High load averages!

ast pid: 17012;  load averages: 21.74, 20.82, 17.61                       
11:18:15
298 processes: 269 sleeping, 28 running, 1 stopped
CPU states:     % user,     % nice,     % system,     % idle,     % spin
Memory: 234M available, 232M in use, 2544K free, 7076K locked

  PID USERNAME PRI NICE  SIZE   RES STATE   TIME   WCPU    CPU COMMAND
17006 nobody    62    0  340K  548K run/0   0:01 28.95%  6.64% backtalk
17010 naftee    59    0 3364K 2856K run/1   0:01 31.14%  5.86% top
  256 root      78    0   12K    8K run/3 109:54 11.31%  5.86% update
17013 root       1    0   76K  352K sleep   0:02 35.08%  5.08% ftpd


#132 of 384 by keesan on Thu Jan 8 17:16:43 2004:

You can do 'fixseen' for all those conferences where Valerie deleted her
responses.
I will check my procmail filter to see if I did something stupid, but normally
I would expect procmail to just send anything it caught to the bulk folder,
not delete it.  I will ask for a copy of the bounced mails.
And try sending myself mail to grex from somewhere else.


#133 of 384 by mcnally on Thu Jan 8 17:37:29 2004:

re #115:  my mail is mostly addressed to "mcnally@cyberspace.org"

I sent a test message to your account yesterday.  Presumably you
haven't received it, but I got no bounce message.

I'd highly recommend turning off your procmail filter for a while
and testing whether you get mail without it..


#134 of 384 by eprom on Thu Jan 8 19:40:38 2004:

all incoming mail is ignoring my .procmailrc file and sending spam into my
/var/spool/e/p/eprom directory....please fix procmail


#135 of 384 by rcurl on Thu Jan 8 19:59:32 2004:

Why are ancient item headings and responses appearing in many other
conferences without new responses being entered? Here is a brief selection
from the consumer cf: 

> Item 90: Water Filters
> Entered by Valerie Mates (valerie) on Tue, Nov  4, 1997 (23:27):
> <expurgated & scribbled>
>
> 1 new of 22 responses total.

> #22 of 22: by Rane Curl (rcurl) on Sat, Feb 28, 1998 (13:36):
> They add chlorine *and* ammonia. Chloramine itself is a highly explosive
> liquid. The chloramine is formed in solution (no, its not explosive in
> solution).

> Respond or pass?

> Item 92: Advertising and public services
> Entered by C. Keesan (keesan) on Thu, Mar  5, 1998 (17:12):

> Respond or pass?

> Item 98: Looking for a plumber
> Entered by Valerie Mates (valerie) on Tue, Oct 27, 1998 (22:10):
> <expurgated & scribbled>

> Respond or pass?


#136 of 384 by willcome on Thu Jan 8 20:00:37 2004:

It's the bitch's fault.


#137 of 384 by rcurl on Thu Jan 8 20:10:57 2004:

It has caused me a considerable waste of time to run fixseen in a large
number of cfs that I watch.


#138 of 384 by cross on Thu Jan 8 20:24:47 2004:

This response has been erased.



#139 of 384 by aruba on Thu Jan 8 20:28:43 2004:

Rane: Valerie decided to leave Grex, and to delete all the responses she's
ever made on Grex.  So every item she ever responded to shows up as new.


#140 of 384 by rcurl on Thu Jan 8 20:31:20 2004:

Great... (that's a contradiction, so it is false but humerous, although
the extra dots are required to convey the sense in which it is said).



#141 of 384 by willcome on Thu Jan 8 20:32:55 2004:

(except that it's not really funny.)


#142 of 384 by happyboy on Thu Jan 8 21:05:27 2004:

re139




        *sigh*





#143 of 384 by davel on Thu Jan 8 21:44:54 2004:

Re 140: so it relates to your elbow, Rane?


#144 of 384 by naftee on Thu Jan 8 22:32:15 2004:

re 141 "humerous" is not funny either.


#145 of 384 by rcurl on Thu Jan 8 23:44:29 2004:

...some people sure don't have senses of humer...


#146 of 384 by mynxcat on Fri Jan 9 02:21:30 2004:

Backtalk doesn't allow a fw to delete posts from items, even if the post was
by the fw himself. (FWs can delete complete items though)


#147 of 384 by keesan on Fri Jan 9 03:41:23 2004:

How do I turn off procmail?  Today I got two spams address to @grex.org but
nothing from real people including McNally who sent me the text mail.


#148 of 384 by aruba on Fri Jan 9 04:00:51 2004:

One way is just to rename the .forward file in your home directory.  For
instance, type "!mv .forward .forward.old".


#149 of 384 by sholmes on Fri Jan 9 04:00:57 2004:

I think you can turn off procmail by removing that line in .forward which
refers to procmail or simple solution is to just rename .forward to a
different name for some time. like mv .forward bkp.forward.


#150 of 384 by sholmes on Fri Jan 9 04:02:00 2004:

148 slipped in.


#151 of 384 by keesan on Fri Jan 9 04:41:09 2004:

I put a # in front of the line in .forward to disable it - is that right?
I since today I got two more spame to @grex.org I just sent myself one more
test mail to keesan@grex.org.

The friend who got back bounced mail said it was bounced on Jan 3 with a 'host
name lookup failure for cyberspace.org'.  When was our domain name problem
fixed?  Perhaps the spammers have some way to get through that real people
don't know about?  

I have not had any bounced mail when I mailed to my grex account from another
account in the last two days.


#152 of 384 by bhoward on Fri Jan 9 05:01:55 2004:

I *think* sendmail respects # as a comment character in .forward, but
I have encountered other mailers in the past that didn't.  I think it
is better to move the .forward to a different file name if you aren't
using it right now.

I've observed no domain problems for the last few days now, not even in
asia (for some reason, dns on servers I frequent in Japan and Hong
Kong took a bit longer than the US based ones I use to notice the dns
corrections).


#153 of 384 by keesan on Fri Jan 9 14:42:26 2004:

After I put # in front of the line in .forward, and also after I renamed it
.forward.bak, I got both my test mails and also four of the spams that would
normally have gone into the bulk or other spam folders.  Anyone want to take
a look at my .forward.bak (or .forward) file to see what stupid thing I might
have done to it last time I added a few filters?  Thanks all.

But four spams slipped by whatever filter was causing the problem.  I have
saved two of them in case they are helpful.

Do I need to make my .forward file readable somehow (chmod +x .forward)?


#154 of 384 by keesan on Fri Jan 9 15:35:34 2004:

I got my grex mail fixed just in time.  Today I got a bounced mail at my
temporary address which I sent to someone using a service that uses spamcop's
blackhole list.  I would greatly appreciate someone helping me to fix my spam
filter here so my box does not fill up with trash.


#155 of 384 by aruba on Fri Jan 9 16:38:44 2004:

Sindi - that error message your friend got sounds like it was during the
period when a lot of people were reporting domain lookup problems on both
grex.org and cyberspace.org.  I still don't know what caused that - it was
only cyberspace.org that changed registrars.


#156 of 384 by gelinas on Sat Jan 10 02:56:51 2004:

named on grex was running but not, apparently, working.  I restarted just
before the machine went down for the mail problem, IIRC.  Apparently, 
we dropped out of puck.nether.net's config files, while named wasn't
responding.


#157 of 384 by naftee on Sat Jan 10 14:14:43 2004:

IRC


#158 of 384 by keesan on Sat Jan 10 16:32:54 2004:

I am getting mail okay now and have started a new .procmailrc file and am
sending myself a test mail every time I add a filter but I would still
appreciate people telling me what I did wrong with .procmailrc.old so I won't
do it again.  How do I filter (with one filter):  viagra, v-i-a-g-r-a,
v!iagra, v1agra  without filtering all my mail to a bulk folder?


#159 of 384 by kip on Sat Jan 10 16:54:07 2004:

I'm not certain, but I believe it was just a manner of poor luck and timing
that the DNS issues occured about the same time and were the real cause of
your mail issues.  


#160 of 384 by keesan on Sat Jan 10 17:12:01 2004:

The DNS problems were in addition to my mail filter problems.  I started
getting mail yesterday a minute after I removed my filter.


#161 of 384 by kip on Sat Jan 10 18:24:29 2004:

Hmmm, okay then.  May I suggest you add something like this to your filter
file near the top:

LOGFILE=/a/k/e/keesan/mail/procmail.log

Or whereever you would like to point that file.

That will give you a file that records the From:, date, Subject: and eventual
file or destination for every email procmail handles.  Very useful for 
tracking these types of issues down.


#162 of 384 by keesan on Sat Jan 10 18:53:12 2004:

Thanks, but I think I would fill up my disk quota quickly if I logged all my
spams.  Jeremy found my problem - I added five filters without a * before
^Subject.  I restored my old .procmailrc and will test that i can send myself
mail every time I change it.  


#163 of 384 by kip on Sat Jan 10 21:54:15 2004:

That's true, procmail averages about 150 characters per log entry for me 
at my home domain and last month I had a little over 16,000 emails, so the 
whole month's procmail log was just under 2.5 million bytes.  That would 
chew up the quota here pretty fast. 


#164 of 384 by mcnally on Sat Jan 10 22:47:31 2004:

 *if* you left it on..


#165 of 384 by keesan on Sun Jan 11 01:00:16 2004:

I have a very long filter set up and all four of the spams that arrived in
the last two hours were of the XOCPT she swims bananas type with five lines
of nonsense words before the HTML.  I have not found any way to filter them
- any ideas?


#166 of 384 by i on Sun Jan 11 12:42:33 2004:

Dialing in to 761-3000 several times in the past few days, i've gotten
NO CARRIER disconnects as soon as the modems are done with their training
tones.  Dialing in to 761-3451 gets me in normally when this happens.


#167 of 384 by ryan on Mon Jan 12 19:18:47 2004:

This response has been erased.



#168 of 384 by gelinas on Mon Jan 12 23:09:19 2004:

Someone hogged up a lot of space.  I'm looking into it, but I don't have a
lot of time right now.


#169 of 384 by willcome on Mon Jan 12 23:30:56 2004:

Hey, punk, that doesn't help Grex.


#170 of 384 by naftee on Sun Jan 18 07:07:44 2004:

tail: /var/log/messages: Permission denied

Fix this please.


#171 of 384 by scott on Sun Jan 18 13:43:50 2004:

That's intentional.


#172 of 384 by kip on Sun Jan 18 14:48:35 2004:

I'll bite.  What is in /var/log/messages that you want to see?


#173 of 384 by willcome on Sun Jan 18 15:23:36 2004:

ACN"T YOU SEE I"M COLOUREd??


#174 of 384 by naftee on Sun Jan 18 18:12:35 2004:

re 172 Someone killed my login processes last night while I was in party. 
I want to know who did it.


#175 of 384 by naftee on Sun Jan 18 18:35:39 2004:

last pid: 15042;  load averages: 10.59, 15.37, 14.54                      
            13:35:16
220 processes: 213 sleeping, 3 running, 4 zombie
CPU states: 28.2% user,  0.0% nice, 18.7% system, 31.6% idle, 21.5% spin
Memory: 233M available, 151M in use, 82M free, 7992K locked

  PID USERNAME PRI NICE  SIZE   RES STATE   TIME   WCPU    CPU COMMAND
 5058 root       1    0   17M   16M sleep 325:47 11.34% 11.33% named
15031 k0i        1    0  924K  464K sleep   0:00 17.03%  3.91% sendmail
15029 k0i        1    0  924K  464K sleep   0:00 15.33%  3.52% sendmail
15020 k0i        1    0  924K  464K sleep   0:00 10.22%  3.12% sendmail
15024 k0i        1    0  924K  464K sleep   0:00  8.95%  2.73% sendmail
15022 k0i        1    0  924K  464K sleep   0:00  8.95%  2.73% sendmail
15018 k0i        1    0  924K  464K sleep   0:00  8.02%  2.73% sendmail
  256 root      15    0   12K    8K sleep 591:38  3.73%  2.34% update
15027 krj        3    0  364K  472K sleep   0:00  7.27%  1.95% vi
15041 root      40    0  904K  460K run/1   0:00 30.77%  1.56% sendmail
14995 k0i        1    0  924K  464K sleep   0:00  3.02%  1.56% sendmail
14990 k0i        1    0  924K  464K sleep   0:00  2.76%  1.56% sendmail
15034 root       1    0  904K  444K sleep   0:00  8.30%  1.56% sendmail
15009 k0i        1    0  924K  464K sleep   0:00  2.69%  1.17% sendmail


#176 of 384 by willcome on Sun Jan 18 19:04:47 2004:

Looks like Valerie's back to her old tricks.


#177 of 384 by ryan on Sun Jan 18 19:13:50 2004:

This response has been erased.



#178 of 384 by kip on Sun Jan 18 19:22:36 2004:

re 174 /var/log/messages doesn't contain information that would say who killed
a login process.  Or at least it doesn't to my eyes.  I'll defer to other
staff with more experience.


#179 of 384 by ryan on Sun Jan 18 19:49:27 2004:

This response has been erased.



#180 of 384 by mcnally on Sun Jan 18 20:19:51 2004:

  re #174:  I recently had an evening where I kept getting logged
  out abruptly, several times while in party.  Did you just leap
  to the conclusion that you were being persecuted by a vengeful
  root user?  My assumption was that it was likely that network
  problems were causing my session to drop out..  I'm not sure how
  you'd differentiate between the two scenarios in a typical login
  session, so perhaps you should at least consider other causes..


#181 of 384 by twenex on Sun Jan 18 20:24:35 2004:

I've been having this, too - after a while, if i don't type anything, my
session just gets dropped. Is that the problem you've ben having, Mike?


#182 of 384 by ryan on Sun Jan 18 20:35:12 2004:

This response has been erased.



#183 of 384 by willcome on Sun Jan 18 20:39:29 2004:

I already have an item about this in coop.  maybe oldcoop.


#184 of 384 by kip on Sun Jan 18 20:41:04 2004:

re 179 actually that would be /var/log/sulog.


#185 of 384 by gull on Sun Jan 18 22:21:24 2004:

I get Pine sessions killed with various signals from time to time.  I
don't know why.  I'd been assuming some hardware glitch.


#186 of 384 by goose on Mon Jan 19 03:54:08 2004:

I for one am glad that the messages file is closed to all but roots.


#187 of 384 by naftee on Mon Jan 19 04:02:26 2004:

re 177 All the crappy e-mail bombers are written with Italian instructions.

re 180 Both ryan and jimj were in party at the same time; it's more than
enough to get worried.

re 184 It is /var/log/messages on FreeBSD, maybe it's different on SunOS.

re 186 I'm glad you're just a silly old goose.


#188 of 384 by kip on Mon Jan 19 04:12:24 2004:

It is different here.  Use of the su command is logged in /var/log/sulog, not
/var/log/messages



#189 of 384 by jiffer on Mon Jan 19 04:18:58 2004:

Naftee you are paranoid. 

And now for my paranoid issue.  I logged in to find that I supposedly sent
junk crap mail to people and it was bounced back.  I find this more than just
strange but odd since I never send mail on grex anymore and all my mail from
grex should be forwarding which is forwarding again.  so... there, and who
ever the unethical jerk who did this, f- you! f- you  and your large a-hole!


#190 of 384 by naftee on Mon Jan 19 04:40:07 2004:

Jiffer quit being mean.


#191 of 384 by gelinas on Mon Jan 19 04:54:52 2004:

It's probably a virus, choosing an e-mail address from the infected machine's
address book.


#192 of 384 by bhoward on Mon Jan 19 05:06:47 2004:

Occasionally, if I am disconnected from grex for being idle to long
but log in just after having been disconnected, I will get forcibly
signed-off again.  Unfortunately, I don't have enough debugging 
evidence to really nail down the cause but I assume there may be
a bug in the idle login killer or robocop that causes it to mistake
my fresh loging for a valid target process to kill.


#193 of 384 by bhoward on Mon Jan 19 05:07:38 2004:

s/loging/login session


#194 of 384 by goose on Mon Jan 19 16:08:09 2004:

RE#189 -- Yep, your address was harvested from someone elses machine that has
been infected with a virus.  It looks like you sent mail, but you really
didn't.  It's a huge pain in the ass, but there is nothing you can do about
it.


#195 of 384 by jiffer on Mon Jan 19 16:49:47 2004:

Drats, that is a bit embarressing.  

Naftee I am always mean. 


#196 of 384 by remmers on Mon Jan 19 17:27:53 2004:

I frequently get spam with the "From:" address forged to look like
it came from somebody I know.  As Chris says, the most likely
explanation is that both addresses were lifted by a virus from the
address book on some third party's infected (Windows) machine.


#197 of 384 by albaugh on Mon Jan 19 18:14:44 2004:

Is this the proper item in which to report an e-mail "difficulty"?


#198 of 384 by gelinas on Mon Jan 19 18:19:50 2004:

Probably as good as any.  What's up?


#199 of 384 by albaugh on Mon Jan 19 18:40:13 2004:

For I'm not sure how long now an e-quaintance who receives my grex e-mail OK
cannot get mail delivered [back] to grex.  After a few days, he gets a bounce
message that looks like this:


From: "Mail Delivery System" <MAILER-DAEMON@out1.mx.nwbl.wi.voyager.net>
To: <auser@voyager.net>
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 11:34 AM
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

This is the Postfix program at host out1.mx.nwbl.wi.voyager.net.

I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message returned
below could not be delivered to one or more destinations.

For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster>

If you do so, please include this problem report. 
You can delete your own text from the message returned below.

The Postfix program

<auser@cyberspace.org>: connect to 
grex.cyberspace.org[216.93.104.34]: read timeout


I guess I should contact the voyager.net postmaster (my e-quaintance isn't
computer savvy), but before I do, does the grex "side" have anything to
comment on about this?



#200 of 384 by gelinas on Mon Jan 19 19:00:55 2004:

My _guess_ is that they've set a too-short timeout on the voyager end.

Hmm...

    Jan 18 02:08:37 grex sendmail[19179]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR: putoutmsg
        (out0.mx.nwbl.wi.voyager.net): error on output channel
        sending "220 ESMTP spoken here": Connection refused by
        out0.mx.nwbl.wi.voyager.net

The connection is supposed to be something like:

} telnet grex.cyberspace.org 25
} Trying 216.93.104.34...
} Connected to grex.cyberspace.org.
} Escape character is '^]'.
} 220-grex.cyberspace.org Sendmail 8.6.13/8.6.12 ready at Mon, 19 Jan 2004
        13:57:13 -0500
} 220 ESMTP spoken here

Apparently, that second line never gets back to out?.mx.nwbl.wi.voyager.net,
and then things time-out/break.


#201 of 384 by albaugh on Mon Jan 19 19:05:07 2004:

Does that mean that the grex side is "failing" in some way, or is it still
something on the voyager.net side.  BTW, I'm very sure that my e-quaintance
would have mentioned if this problem ocurred with other systems he tries to
send e-mail to...


#202 of 384 by gelinas on Mon Jan 19 19:21:02 2004:

I think it's on the voyager side: grex is trying to send something, but
voyager doesn't accept it.


#203 of 384 by cross on Mon Jan 19 20:33:35 2004:

This response has been erased.



#204 of 384 by eprom on Mon Jan 19 22:24:51 2004:

why is procmail acting funny again?


#205 of 384 by gelinas on Mon Jan 19 23:07:32 2004:

(Voyager is rejecting the message with a "time out" error, but grex is
reporting "connection refused.")


#206 of 384 by naftee on Tue Jan 20 01:23:36 2004:

re 200 IS THAT THE MAILLOG?


#207 of 384 by eprom on Tue Jan 20 02:08:10 2004:

re#204 

nevermind...i'm stupid...I turned on the verbose logging and figured it out.


#208 of 384 by tsty on Thu Jan 22 06:58:24 2004:

re 123 & 139 ... "valerie left grex" ?????????   surely you jest!


#209 of 384 by slynne on Thu Jan 22 14:01:43 2004:

Heh, I guess you havent logged on a while. 


#210 of 384 by gull on Thu Jan 22 15:44:26 2004:

Maybe he doesn't read coop.


#211 of 384 by happyboy on Thu Jan 22 17:13:09 2004:

/pops some popcorn and puts "lost weekend" into the vcr


#212 of 384 by naftee on Sat Jan 24 04:19:04 2004:

Use PicoSPAN, not backtalk, when mass-forgetting items.


#213 of 384 by lowclass on Sat Jan 24 05:53:38 2004:

  OKay, one simple and possibly pwertinent question. Is it possible to do a
Fixseen on an individual Item instead of a whole ocnference? Seems somebody
has offered us the benefit of Greek classics, and sooner or later, somebody
will come along and do it as some sort of implicit censorship to ANY item,
or author of an item they might dislike.

        No, I do not know Scripting, much less C. maybe the idea is of use,
in any case.


#214 of 384 by bhoward on Sat Jan 24 12:21:34 2004:

"fixseen" or "seen" defaults to all items in a conference if no arguments
are given.

If you want to "fix" a single item, just add that item's number as an
argument.  For example:
        fix 1
        seen 1
        fixseen 1

all do the same thing, and mark all the responses in item 1 as
already read.



#215 of 384 by keesan on Sat Jan 24 13:49:10 2004:

Can you fixseen 63-end?


#216 of 384 by kip on Sat Jan 24 14:40:32 2004:

Yes, you can, though I think if you want to just deal with agora and the
repeated items, fixseen 100-171 would do the trick.


#217 of 384 by ryan on Sat Jan 24 17:06:30 2004:

This response has been erased.



#218 of 384 by naftee on Sat Jan 24 18:47:35 2004:

By the way, there's still lots of space left on the device:
/dev/sd0e             706783  446639  189466    70%    /bbs


#219 of 384 by naftee on Sat Jan 24 18:48:29 2004:

re 216 'r 100-171 pass' also works.

Or just 'forget 100-171'.  That too.


#220 of 384 by drew on Sat Jan 24 19:41:54 2004:

Read since jan 23 pass in the conferences that I check regularly generated
a 2+ megabyte file. No way I can spare the connect time to download it, let
alone the real-time to read it. This is more than an order of magnitude
greater than the usual traffic. What's going on here?


#221 of 384 by naftee on Sat Jan 24 19:57:59 2004:

What are you talking about?


#222 of 384 by rcurl on Sat Jan 24 22:44:04 2004:

I just did a fixseen on agora. However it took many minutes to "fix" all
the damage. 


#223 of 384 by naftee on Sun Jan 25 00:36:58 2004:

It took a couple of seconds to run the command that I posted. 


#224 of 384 by tsty on Sun Jan 25 11:36:05 2004:

re 209-210 ...uhhhh, correct.
  
family situations have absorbed grex-time, much to my dismay.
  
it does seem that growing pains (on grex) have led to privacy controvesies.
  
a looooong, looong,looong time ago a person whom i quicky learned
to abhor did, however, provide one valuable chunk of advice;
  
if you are not willing to see your text on the front page of the 
new york times tomorrow, dont' type it tonight.
  
that protects a lot of people, actually, but confounds the misiion
of both grex and the m-b0x. 
 
catharsis and conversation initially reserved to a small group of
'known' intellects having been spawned to the vulgate masses creates
a nearly untenable conflict for the existence of the forum.
  
constructing a higher civilizatin necesitates brick walls somewhere.
  
a friend, a real friend, sent me some confrernce pointers which reinforce
al of the above. tankxx, (xxx).
  
 ---more later ---


#225 of 384 by albaugh on Wed Feb 4 17:50:29 2004:

> Grex locked up because /usr/local filled up.

What is that [partition] used for, and how did it fill up?


#226 of 384 by gelinas on Wed Feb 4 19:09:23 2004:

It's used for various lcoal (i.e., machine/host specific) configurations and
programs.  It filled up with core files had been saving, but we didn't really
need.  There are also some log files on that partition, I think.  It was
probably writing to one of them that immediately filled the disk partition.
Removing the core files solved the problem.


#227 of 384 by tsty on Fri Feb 6 06:37:53 2004:

what is it about the difference between logging in by regular
telnet versus  ssh that allows mail by telnet but says thre
is no mail by ssh.
  
i can invoke the -f flag and my mail file by ssh though.
  
curious behaviour methinkxx.


#228 of 384 by gelinas on Fri Feb 6 12:22:46 2004:

If your .login file does not include the line

        source /usr/local/etc/global.login

you can add the lines

        #ssh is setting $MAIL wrong, so let's re-set $MAIL here: -vm  1/30/01
        setenv MAIL `/usr/local/bin/maildir $USER`


#229 of 384 by gull on Fri Feb 6 16:21:51 2004:

Re resp:227: sshd does not set the MAIL environment variable properly. 
Resp:228 is correct if your shell is csh or tcsh, which is what tsty
seems to be using.

For those of you who use bash, you probably want this in your .profile:

MAIL=`/usr/local/bin/maildir $USER` ; export MAIL


#230 of 384 by gull on Fri Feb 6 16:22:18 2004:

(Note that those are backticks, not apostrophes.)


#231 of 384 by tsty on Fri Feb 6 21:43:15 2004:

hmmm, will try teh #228 fix .. thankxx to gelinas AND   -vm  1/30/01


#232 of 384 by tsty on Fri Feb 6 21:44:54 2004:

well done!! for ssh and tcsh.


#233 of 384 by albaugh on Thu Feb 12 20:12:46 2004:

What might it mean if a foreign host trying to ftp into grex were shown the
following, after the correct password were accepted:

230->>>NO PSYBNC<<<  >>>NO EGGDROP<<<  NO NO NO!!!!!  Won't run here!
421 Service not available, remote server has closed connection
Login failed.

Note that the same foreign host has no problem telnetting into grex - that
is happening right now.


#234 of 384 by gull on Thu Feb 12 20:42:41 2004:

You're not trying to ftp in as 'anonymous', are you?


#235 of 384 by albaugh on Thu Feb 12 20:49:00 2004:

No - I enter my grex username & password.  It even knows if I use an incorrect
password.  Of course, all I "know" about what the foreign host is doing w.r.t.
ftp is what I see on the screen.  Since I assume that inbound ftp to grex
works in general, I suspect it must be something about how the foreign host
is connecting etc. to grex.  What does the 421 condition truly mean?


#236 of 384 by gull on Thu Feb 12 20:54:15 2004:

Hmm...it worked for me, but Grex's FTP daemon seems really sluggish.  I
wonder if your connection is timing out somehow.


#237 of 384 by remmers on Thu Feb 12 22:20:55 2004:

Could be.  I just tried connecting, twice.  First time it timed out
with a 421 error.  Second time, I made it in and got to the ftp>
prompt.


#238 of 384 by rcurl on Fri Feb 13 06:19:29 2004:

I just logged in and found 72 newresponse items in agora, but they are
mostly false - what shows are just item headings. Is there another
scribbler at work now?


#239 of 384 by bhoward on Fri Feb 13 09:58:55 2004:

Tod appears to have decided to join the ranks of the unrecorded.


#240 of 384 by albaugh on Fri Feb 13 18:17:08 2004:

(for the 3rd time - moron)


#241 of 384 by albaugh on Fri Feb 13 18:17:37 2004:

Note that my 421 was immediate - no timeout associated.


#242 of 384 by tpryan on Sat Feb 14 16:20:00 2004:

        Just as disruptive as farting in every item.


#243 of 384 by naftee on Sat Feb 14 17:21:55 2004:

                Just like your mom.


#244 of 384 by happyboy on Mon Feb 16 20:45:21 2004:

                


        *mommyfarts*


#245 of 384 by albaugh on Wed Feb 18 19:13:16 2004:

FYI, I still get 421 every time I ftp-connect to grex from the only foreign
host from which I would do that.


#246 of 384 by gelinas on Wed Feb 18 22:26:23 2004:

[Jura:~] gelinas% ftp grex.cyberspace.org.
Connected to grex.cyberspace.org.


421 Service not available, remote server timed out. Connection closed
ftp> 
ftp> pwd
Not connected.
ftp> open grex.cyberspace.org.
Connected to grex.cyberspace.org.

421 Service not available, remote server timed out. Connection closed
ftp> 


#247 of 384 by rational on Wed Feb 18 23:02:26 2004:

Why are you on staff if you don't know how to fix that?


#248 of 384 by albaugh on Wed Feb 18 23:16:11 2004:

Just now, it seems I am unable to ftp-connect (I waited for a while with no
response, then broke out via Ctrl-C).  In the past, I successfully
ftp-connected with grex, but after logging in, I was immediately given a 421,
but immediately, with no mention of a timeout.


#249 of 384 by rcurl on Thu Feb 19 17:11:15 2004:

I just ftp'd to my Grex account using the client Fetch. It took quite a long
time to get through, but it did eventually. 


#250 of 384 by tsty on Fri Feb 20 06:22:39 2004:

ssh, tonight was sure snarfed ... didn't even get a login pormpt.


#251 of 384 by gelinas on Sat Feb 21 02:50:20 2004:

Looks like the problem with FTP might have been caused by a problem with
named, which has now been restarted.


#252 of 384 by tsty on Sat Feb 21 16:13:08 2004:

ttys tied up ....
  
unnamed  ttypa    10:56am     6   6:02     33  /bin/ld -e start -dc -dp -o conf
kjutas   ttypb    10:45am    17      6      5  lynx www.text.plusgsm.pl
markis   ttypc    10:56am     8      7      1  -bash
crapula  ttypf    11:00am            8      3  /usr/local/grex-scripts/.inet_re
crapula  ttyq3    10:55am            6      4  /usr/local/grex-scripts/.inet_re
crapula  ttyq8    10:51am            9      5  /usr/local/grex-scripts/.inet_re
crapula  ttyqa    10:54am            6      4  /usr/local/grex-scripts/.inet_re
crapula  ttyr5    10:53am            8      4  /usr/local/grex-scripts/.inet_re
crapula  ttyr8    10:58am            5      2  /usr/local/grex-scripts/.inet_re
crapula  ttyre    10:54am            5      4  /usr/local/grex-scripts/.inet_re
crapula  ttyrf    10:59am            7      3  /usr/local/grex-scripts/.inet_re
crapula  ttys7    10:52am            7      4  /usr/local/grex-scripts/.inet_re
crapula  ttyt3    11:04am            7      2  /usr/local/grex-scripts/.inet_re
chetansk ttyt6    10:42am           33     28  lynx
pronstar ttyt8     9:12am           17      8  /usr/local/bin/party_
crapula  ttyu5    10:56am           10      4  /usr/local/grex-scripts/.inet_re
crapula  ttyu8    11:05am            7      2  -bash
durg     ttyu9     9:55am    14     16     11  lynx
crapula  ttyua    11:01am            9      4  /usr/local/grex-scripts/.inet_re
newuser  ttyp0    10Feb04  8days   5:18   3:56  pine
newuser  ttyp5     8:59am           41      3  w
>


#253 of 384 by naftee on Sat Feb 21 17:28:11 2004:

crapulatastique!


#254 of 384 by naftee on Mon Feb 23 00:14:56 2004:

GreX is slower than a peanut-butter river and there are high load_averages.


#255 of 384 by rational on Mon Feb 23 00:32:44 2004:

IT"S RUNNLING LIKE MOLASSES!


#256 of 384 by ryan on Mon Feb 23 00:56:21 2004:

This response has been erased.



#257 of 384 by salad on Mon Feb 23 01:41:30 2004:

IT WASN'T ME SOMEONE LOCKED MY ACCOUNT
I'M INNOCENT WAS'NT EVEN LOGGED ON

!last -2 naftee


#258 of 384 by albaugh on Mon Feb 23 22:24:00 2004:

Re: #251: Seeing that, I tried to ftp again from my remote host.  I got just
a little further, but after grex displayed this:

230->>>NO PSYBNC<<<  >>>NO EGGDROP<<<  NO NO NO!!!!!  Won't run here!
230-
230-You must keep file transfers below 100 kilobytes >>>per day<<<.
230-
230-DO NOT BRING THESE FILES TO THIS SERVER:
230-NO eggdrop, NO psybnc or any bouncer, NO IRC servers/clients/bots, NO
emech,
230-NO MUDs, NO mp3s, NO jpegs, NO gifs, NO audio files, NO PTLink, NO BitchX,
230-NO Windows or Linux programs (won't run here - Grex runs SunOS), NO
Unreal,

it "froze" - I had to use Ctrl-C to break out.  Now I'm back to getting the
immediate 421 after login.


#259 of 384 by salad on Tue Feb 24 00:21:14 2004:

NO NO NO!!!


#260 of 384 by gelinas on Tue Feb 24 01:45:25 2004:

I don't know what the problem is, albaugh; I just tried it with no problem.


#261 of 384 by salad on Tue Feb 24 02:23:40 2004:

The problem is, you fuckers stole my account.


#262 of 384 by rcurl on Fri Feb 27 02:28:47 2004:

What fraction of incoming e-mail on grex is spam? It must be a very large
fraction, given what I observe on a couple of accounts. Is this a good
utilization of server capacity? 


#263 of 384 by ryan on Fri Feb 27 02:50:50 2004:

This response has been erased.



#264 of 384 by rcurl on Fri Feb 27 02:54:04 2004:

Isn't this a concern to Grex staff/board? It would seem that Grex is providing
"service" primarily to spammers rather than to users. I don't see indications
that this bothers anyone very much (unless there is something in coop about
it). 


#265 of 384 by gelinas on Fri Feb 27 03:06:13 2004:

Marcus has added anti-spam features to sendmail.  When he gets time, or at
other impetus not clear to me, he looks at the mail forwarded to uce and tries
to "sharpen the teeth" of his spam-filter.

There has been some discussion but, so far as I know, no progress on the mail
system for the new grex machine.


#266 of 384 by rcurl on Fri Feb 27 03:52:18 2004:

I was forwarding all of this spam I've been getting to uce, but I saw no
change (well, actually a great increase) in the amount of spam received,
so I quit. It is quite time consuming to forward the spam, and with no
evident improvement, I just delete it now.

If it is really true that 90% of the e-mail received here is spam, I would
suggest some drastic action, like everyone changing their e-mail address,
or do it wholesale by (say) adding "6" to the end of every account. But
then everyone would have to inform their correspondents.... I HATE SPAM.




#267 of 384 by salad on Fri Feb 27 04:06:33 2004:

I h8 u


#268 of 384 by rational on Fri Feb 27 04:16:25 2004:

I h8 fags.


#269 of 384 by twenex on Fri Feb 27 04:17:37 2004:

The feeling is most likely mutual. Or it would be, if cigarettes had feelings.


#270 of 384 by rational on Fri Feb 27 04:31:47 2004:

Do you have terrifically bad reading comprehension, or are you purposely
misinterpreting the fact that "fag" in that context undeniably refers to
homosexuals?


#271 of 384 by twenex on Fri Feb 27 04:32:37 2004:

The latter, obviously.


#272 of 384 by rational on Fri Feb 27 04:33:05 2004:

Why would you do that?  It's not very clever?


#273 of 384 by ryan on Fri Feb 27 13:30:30 2004:

This response has been erased.



#274 of 384 by rational on Fri Feb 27 13:32:04 2004:

send it 2 uce, newB.


#275 of 384 by aruba on Fri Feb 27 15:09:53 2004:

I get around 40 spams a day on Grex, thanks to several of my addresses being
on the web.  I, for one, am pretty annoyed by it, but I don't know what we
can do.  Of course, I don't know how many more I'd be getting without
Marcus's spam filter, but my sense is still that his approach isn't working.
Can we allow users to filter their own spam on the new machine?


#276 of 384 by katie on Fri Feb 27 15:43:54 2004:

I get hundreds of spam messages per week. I often delete important
real email by mistake while deleting the spam. It is very irritating.


#277 of 384 by tod on Fri Feb 27 16:27:18 2004:

This response has been erased.



#278 of 384 by albaugh on Fri Feb 27 18:09:32 2004:

Yes, 90+ percent of the e-mail I receive at grex is SPAM.  I haven't yet made
the effort to set up procmail rules to try to filter out the obvious ones...


#279 of 384 by keesan on Fri Feb 27 21:04:04 2004:

You can try my .procmailrc (and .forward) - I filter out about 2/3 of my spam
that way.  Maybe more, as I am sending some larger categories to /dev/null
and just saving stuff that might also be real mail (hi, hello, test....).


#280 of 384 by tod on Fri Feb 27 22:47:28 2004:

This response has been erased.



#281 of 384 by keesan on Fri Feb 27 23:35:22 2004:

Only add names of people you want mail from at the beginning if you find that
mail from them is ending up in your spam folder(s).  I filter into different
folders out of curiosity - you could filter it all to /bulk/ instead.  
I was filtering 'hi' 'hello' and 'test' because of a recent virus that no
longer appears to be around (the SCO virus) so you should probably remove
those filters or you might catch a lot of friends in them.  If you tend to
get mail from your friends on the subject of medications, or refinancing,
remove those filters too.  When something slips through my filters, I look
at the header to see what I might filter on - sometimes  something simple
like X-Authentication or X-Mailer that nobody else uses.
Half the Nigeria spams get through - I might add 'Good Morning'.


#282 of 384 by tod on Fri Feb 27 23:50:06 2004:

This response has been erased.



#283 of 384 by keesan on Sat Feb 28 01:30:57 2004:

When you set up a filter, it automatically creates folders when it catches
spam for them.  You can mkdir to create them yourself in ~/mail.  You can also
save mail to folders and they will be created.  To see the different folders,
type L while in Pine.  I delete my folders after looking in them and finding
nothing but spam.


#284 of 384 by tod on Sat Feb 28 15:57:54 2004:

This response has been erased.



#285 of 384 by keesan on Sat Feb 28 19:59:36 2004:

Congratulations on your first three filtered spams!  Today I added a filter
for X-MSMail-Priority:.* when I got two spams with that in the header (type
H to see the header).  Trying to sell vkiagra.


#286 of 384 by keesan on Sat Feb 28 20:07:15 2004:

Which twit accounts are currently active?  I would like to fit all the twits
onto one line of my twit filter.   Is the polytarp account, or the dah or
asddsa or naftee or dah account still open?  


#287 of 384 by rational on Sat Feb 28 20:08:50 2004:

None of those accounts are still active.


#288 of 384 by salad on Sat Feb 28 20:15:11 2004:

Neither are the boltwitz account(s) .  You might want to add the coopcf
account, since  I plan on adding some more shit with that account.


#289 of 384 by remmers on Sun Feb 29 12:21:50 2004:

You can find that out using the 'finger' command.  For example,
"!finger -m asddsa" yields "no such user".


#290 of 384 by salad on Sun Feb 29 17:17:53 2004:

That's not foolproof.  The 'naftee' account still exists but I can't use it.


#291 of 384 by asddsa on Sun Feb 29 17:18:50 2004:

re 289 Not anymore!


#292 of 384 by jhudson on Mon Mar 1 17:11:41 2004:

Since *all* of my e-mail is spam, I set up a rule to bounce it all.


#293 of 384 by tod on Tue Mar 2 00:21:13 2004:

This response has been erased.



#294 of 384 by keesan on Tue Mar 2 01:20:24 2004:

Glad to hear it - how many do you catch every day?
Jim finally succeeded in attaching a file to webmail he was sending with
opera, and mailed it to me. It is plain text.  I got the email without the
attachment but with the following explanation:


--------
WARNING: This e-mail has been altered by MIMEDefang.  Following this
paragraph are indications of the actual changes made.  For more
information about your site's MIMEDefang policy, contact
Frisco Roque/Rex Roof <admins@localhost>.  For more information about
MIMEDefang, see:

            http://www.roaringpenguin.com/mimedefang/enduser.php3

A non-multipart attachment named feb29.eml was removed from this document as it
constituted a security hazard.  If you require this document, please contact
the sender and arrange an alternate means of receiving it.


  [ Part 2: "Attached Text" ]

this has one attachmeent of text. feb29.eml from /D/kermit/



#295 of 384 by rcurl on Tue Mar 2 01:23:02 2004:

Would it have gone through if it had been .txt instead? Some filters are
on the extensions. 


#296 of 384 by keesan on Tue Mar 2 02:41:20 2004:

That is what I told Jim.  I have no idea what .eml meant to him.  email?
I recall sending .slk files which Windows interpreted as Excel when they were
slovak.  We can't use smtp mail until he figures out the smtp server for WCC
-anyone know that?  He wants to compose offline, so he ended up composing the
mail at home, uploading it to grex, importing it into the message body,
sending it to himself at WCC, going to webmail there, and forwarding it.  He
sent me a test mail and it got defanged.  He wants the From address to be at
wcc - is there some way to set Pine to show a reply-to address or a From
address other than grex?  


#297 of 384 by gelinas on Tue Mar 2 02:53:26 2004:

No, it's not possible to reset the "From:" field in Pine on grex.


#298 of 384 by keesan on Tue Mar 2 02:58:30 2004:

Is there some way to set a reply-to address with Pine?
I also tried a program which does stmp/pop mail but WCC wanted a domain name
and password which differ from his email login and password and they don't
make public (at least online) what these might be.  
The handout also mentions nothing about pop mail at WCC.


#299 of 384 by gelinas on Tue Mar 2 03:14:22 2004:

Yes, the commands are:

        M       ; Main menu
        S       ; Setup
        C       ; Configure

Then page down to "customized-hdrs" and 

        A       ; Add value

At the prompt, enter

        Reply-to:

(Be sure to include the colon).

        <RETURN>

to accept the cahnge, the 

        E       ; Exit config
        Y       ; to commit the changes

When compoosing a message, use

        <CTRL>R

to bring up the "Rich Headers", which will include the "Reply-to:" line.


#300 of 384 by keesan on Tue Mar 2 05:43:21 2004:

I typed Reply-To: instead of Reply-to: but that seems to have worked.   At
least it shows up in the received header.  Will the recipient's email program
ask if they want to reply to the reply-to rather than the from address?


#301 of 384 by gelinas on Tue Mar 2 11:47:30 2004:

It's supposed to, Sindi.


#302 of 384 by scott on Tue Mar 2 13:47:55 2004:

The ".eml" format is how Microsoft usually does attachments.  It's
proprietary, of course (those bastards!) but there's an option somewhere to
use plain-text or some other simple format.


#303 of 384 by gull on Tue Mar 2 14:37:27 2004:

".eml" has also been used as a virus vector.


#304 of 384 by keesan on Tue Mar 2 16:07:58 2004:

This time Jim tried to email me as attachment sax.x and it disappeared en
route with no error message.  I suggested he mail things with grex reply-to
and give up on webmail for writing mail.    WCC also sent us server info -
smtp.wwwnet.org  pop mail uses stu.wccnet.org (like webmail does).  

I wonder if Jim named his file .eml or if WCC's mail program did that.  He
said he had to use Opera to attach it but I think it was linux Opera.  Lynx
would not do attachments to webmail and told us so.  


#305 of 384 by keesan on Tue Mar 2 17:20:10 2004:

Jim finally got it right and mailed me an attachment, at about the same time
that I figured out that to use non-webmail at wcc the regular login is
jdeigert@stu.wccnet.org and the email login is plain jdeigert.  I have smtp
mail working now with 2 DOS mail programs, but WCC does not like the email
password (which worked for regular login and for webmail).  No big deal, he
can use webmail to read his mail but it is a pain to write mail with it.


#306 of 384 by tod on Tue Mar 2 18:39:57 2004:

This response has been erased.



#307 of 384 by keesan on Tue Mar 2 19:16:35 2004:

I have changed my filter to send a few things directly to /dev/null
(last line of the filter) instead of ....../bulk  - viagra, via-gra, viakgra,
xanax, cialis, vicodin.  Anything addressed to webmaster and me goes to
/dev/null.  Have fun with your spam net.


#308 of 384 by krokus on Tue Mar 2 21:34:43 2004:

system is slow, and loads are high.

  4:29pm  up 27 days, 18:18,  50 users,  load average: 28.93, 29.96, 27.39


#309 of 384 by jhudson on Wed Mar 3 20:33:08 2004:

That's normal!


#310 of 384 by jhudson on Wed Mar 3 20:53:11 2004:

/tmp has a lot of files called "newuser.xxxxx"
there is a lot of junk in /var/tmp

There seems to be no script to successfully clean up
everything.


#311 of 384 by gelinas on Wed Mar 3 21:42:28 2004:

There is a script, and it does a pretty good job.  But thanks for pointing
out that it may overlook a few things.



#312 of 384 by tsty on Thu Mar 4 19:00:25 2004:

  
newuser  ttyp6    22Feb04  9days      7      2  /usr/local/bin/bash
newuser  ttyp0    10Feb04 20days  11:39  10:17  pine
  
long emails?


#313 of 384 by jhudson on Fri Mar 5 17:41:12 2004:

???
How did somebody get the name "newuser" ?


#314 of 384 by krokus on Fri Mar 5 23:05:41 2004:

re 309
Normal?  sure...

This looks normal:
  6:04pm  up 30 days, 19:54,  42 users,  load average: 5.55, 5.65, 5.74


#315 of 384 by russ on Sun Mar 7 12:03:01 2004:

Only 15 people "on" according to "finger", but this is probably due
to something refusing to allocate pty's.

Also, Grex is excruciatingly slow.  Maybe someone can clear this problem?


#316 of 384 by krj on Mon Mar 8 18:13:37 2004:

It's the return of the cold weather.  Grex moves slower in colder 
weather.

1:10pm  up 33 days, 14:59,  52 users,  load average: 29.58, 29.24, 24.87


#317 of 384 by gelinas on Mon Mar 8 20:02:56 2004:

Fixed; it's coming back down to normal:

  3:02pm  up 33 days, 16:51,  60 users,  load average: 4.86, 9.67, 15.73


#318 of 384 by jor on Mon Mar 8 22:48:24 2004:

         wow much peppier


#319 of 384 by salad on Tue Mar 9 02:11:22 2004:

        HAWT


#320 of 384 by keesan on Wed Mar 10 04:28:17 2004:

We dialed  761-5041 and got screenfuls of gibberish and beeping scrolling by,
followed by a disconnect.  Did this three times.  Tried 761-3000 and got BUSY,
then tried again andgot through okay.  Modem going haywire?  Would this
indicate that hte last modem in the queue is the culprit.  Antoher grex user
reporting things scrolling by and gave us her computer to fix.  It is not
broken.  She said grex also stopped letting her type anything (disconnect?).


#321 of 384 by twenex on Wed Mar 10 15:30:08 2004:

Grex was down/unaviaolble between the hours of 12:45 and 15:20 GMT
(approximately). At one point it was inaccessible by tel;net but could be
pinged, then later it bgecame unpingable also. What happened?


#322 of 384 by gelinas on Wed Mar 10 15:36:15 2004:

I think /tmp filled up, but I'm not really sure.  I came in to find that
a couple of the drives wouldn't fsck automatically and had to be fsck'd
manually.

I couldn't log on at the console and had to power-cycle the machine,
which probably contributed to the fsck problem.  (Dirty shut-downs are
never nice.)


#323 of 384 by twenex on Wed Mar 10 15:39:18 2004:

You're right there.


#324 of 384 by twenex on Wed Mar 10 15:42:45 2004:

Simetmoes O raeyll wohs O cuodl tpye batter.


#325 of 384 by salad on Sat Mar 13 02:01:36 2004:

This response has been erased.



#326 of 384 by salad on Sat Mar 13 02:21:26 2004:

Looks like I fatally fucked up item 320 in the test conference!! SOrry guysd!
please fix


#327 of 384 by rational on Sat Mar 13 02:22:45 2004:

 :(


#328 of 384 by gelinas on Sat Mar 13 03:17:25 2004:

No, I don't think you do anything to the item.  It looks fine to me.

Especially in light of its first response.


#329 of 384 by salad on Sat Mar 13 03:35:46 2004:

O, well, that would mean ryan is fucking the system up, which is prefectly fine
with me.

But it still doesn't solve the problem!!


#330 of 384 by gelinas on Sat Mar 13 04:04:53 2004:

I will be plain:  there is nothing wrong with the item in the test
conference.  The author of the item used an executable as the text of
the item.  It takes a while for picospan to process the file because of
its size, but that's all.

Someone (rational? salad? I forget which) has now entered a very similar
item in agora.  (I don't remember the number.  The commands

        browse 310-328
and
        browse 330-last

should find it.


#331 of 384 by salad on Sat Mar 13 04:17:07 2004:

The item is not similar at all.


#332 of 384 by rcurl on Sat Mar 13 15:52:48 2004:

Respond or pass?
Got error 13 (Permission denied) in opening item file


#333 of 384 by gelinas on Sat Mar 13 16:05:57 2004:

An item was taken off-line for a while.  It has now been put back, with the
text modified.


#334 of 384 by rational on Sat Mar 13 16:43:24 2004:

You mean you PURPOSELY vandalised the bbs.


#335 of 384 by tod on Sat Mar 13 18:33:09 2004:

This response has been erased.



#336 of 384 by tod on Sat Mar 13 18:47:28 2004:

This response has been erased.



#337 of 384 by twenex on Sat Mar 13 19:41:33 2004:

Jerkoff is posting /etc/passwd all over the place. You had the privilege of
seeing the Man in Motion.


#338 of 384 by salad on Sat Mar 13 19:45:31 2004:

haha


#339 of 384 by aruba on Sat Mar 13 20:31:32 2004:

Item 331 gave me an error when I tried browsing it, because the file is
gone.  Typing "forget 331" fixed it so browse doesn't choke.


#340 of 384 by gelinas on Sun Mar 14 00:35:00 2004:

I don't know who removed 331, nor do I know how it was removed.
I jury-rigged something.  I'm kind of surprised it worked. :)


#341 of 384 by tsty on Sun Mar 14 05:42:41 2004:

anyone know what/why there are loooooong delays when going from one
item to the next after the rfp prompt? and also in starting to read
a specific item frm the ok: prompt.
  
i mean times like a minute or more, not just a net-lag few seconds.


#342 of 384 by gelinas on Sun Mar 14 05:54:39 2004:

My *guess* is that it has to do with certain text being entered into
items and then removed by staff.  The removed text is quite large.


#343 of 384 by keesan on Mon Mar 15 02:38:25 2004:

What hardware problem might be responsible if we are unable to do Y and have
it print mail from within pine, on two computers?  On a third computer it all
works.  We tried two printers (which worked elsewhere), two cables, two
computers, one with 2 different modems on 2 comports (2 and 3), two of grex'es
phone numbers (3000 and 5041).  The printer works otherwise and will PrtScr
mail.  Is it possible to print (on your home computer) files that are in your
home directory and if so how, short of downloading them first?

These two computers are ones we put together for a friend who likes to print
all the jokes people send her forwarded in email.  

Also when she forwarded mail from grex (pine, f) the attachments arrived as
large strings of 7-bit characters instead of images, tho the receiving mail
program (webmail) identified them at attachments before she tried to read the
mail.  When I sent her mail directly with an attached image that worked (she
saw the image).  

WE are using Kermit.  Once we had a 14.4 bps modem that would not, with
kermit, print from pine.  But we tried 3 modems tonight.  (I did not want to
take apart my computer to try the one that was in it.)


#344 of 384 by rcurl on Mon Mar 15 06:32:36 2004:

I print text files from my grex directory wby selecting the text and then
using Print Selection (Apple-P).


#345 of 384 by keesan on Mon Mar 15 10:32:50 2004:

Our keyboards don't have any Apple-P key.  I discovered that the problem is
kermit will do prYnt from c:\kermit but not d:\kermit and now we have to talk
her through making a new directory, copying files to it from the old one, and
editing a batch file to change d: to c:.  

Is there a way to print directly with a non-Mac computer from one's home
directory at grex?  I think you can print from lynx directly.


#346 of 384 by gelinas on Mon Mar 15 11:54:50 2004:

Are they the same version of kermit?  I'm *really* surprised that kermit
would care which drive it was on for printing.  It seems more likely
that there is a difference in the terminal-support settings.  Pine uses
"attached to ANSI" for its printing.  (I don't use kermit, so I can't
offer suggestions on checking its settings.)

I think lynx uses the same print mechanism Pine uses.  If one works,
the other should.

"Print Selection" is a feature of the terminal software.  I seem to
recall seeing it in ProComm or ProComm Plus.  Again, I don't use kermit,
so I can't comment on its features.


#347 of 384 by remmers on Mon Mar 15 12:32:06 2004:

Re #345:  For printing Grex text on your local printer, you might try
the "pcprint" command, e.g.

        pcprint FILENAME            (from a shell prompt)
or     read pass 100 | 'pcprint    (in Picospan, to print an item)

This might or might not work, depending on how your terminal software
is set up.


#348 of 384 by remmers on Mon Mar 15 12:38:04 2004:

There is a new vote in progress on a proposal to amend the bylaw
article on member votes.  Voting runs through March 23.  Type  vote
at a shell prompt or  !vote  at any other prompt to read the
proposal and/or cast a ballot.  See item 122 in Coop for discussion.


#349 of 384 by remmers on Mon Mar 15 13:51:27 2004:

I should add that since this is a bylaw amendment, at least 75% of
members voting must vote in favor in order for it to pass.


#350 of 384 by keesan on Mon Mar 15 17:23:30 2004:

I have identical versions of kermit in c: and d: and the one in c: prints and
that in d: does not.  Three computers will print from c:, three won't from
d:, on four printers, various cables.


#351 of 384 by keesan on Mon Mar 15 17:51:56 2004:

My latest linux comes with microcom, a little dialing program smaller than
minicom, which when I try to use it to log into grex, immediately after I give
my login, does Password:  Incorrect password. It appears to be sending some
string which gets interpreted as password, and does not leave me a millisecond
to enter my own password.  When I try this at mnet it dutifully pauses for
me to enter my password, twice.  Other people say it works for them. What
might be happening at grex to cause problems with password giving?


#352 of 384 by tod on Mon Mar 15 17:52:46 2004:

This response has been erased.



#353 of 384 by keesan on Mon Mar 15 17:54:23 2004:

I don't understand the question in #352.  I don't see any strings being
produced before I am told Incorrect password - this appears immediately after
the request for Password:, with no time to enter my password.


#354 of 384 by tod on Mon Mar 15 18:15:04 2004:

This response has been erased.



#355 of 384 by salad on Mon Mar 15 19:37:26 2004:

I prefer 6 bit


#356 of 384 by keesan on Mon Mar 15 23:09:41 2004:

I can try this and get back in ten minutes.  This all works properly at mnet
for some reason, just not at grex.  Works for other people elsewhere.


#357 of 384 by salad on Mon Mar 15 23:26:22 2004:

Isn't m-net down?


#358 of 384 by keesan on Mon Mar 15 23:55:25 2004:

Ctrl-M made no difference.  I wonder if the grex modems are a problem.  I will
try without hardware flow control next.  


#359 of 384 by atlantic on Tue Mar 16 00:10:24 2004:

M-Net isn't responding to my calls.  Is this a known problem?  Is
someone working on it?


#360 of 384 by salad on Tue Mar 16 01:15:38 2004:

(I was referring to the fact that keesan had said she had tested something
on m-net)


#361 of 384 by keesan on Tue Mar 16 02:12:16 2004:

I officially give up on microcom.  I will learn to compile the latest version
of kermit since the precompiled one for SW40 complains about floating points
and the one for SW3.5 does not do FTP, it is too old.  make linux
KFLAGS=-DNOFLOAT after unpacking the source code.  


#362 of 384 by salad on Tue Mar 16 04:46:56 2004:

We just rebooted.


#363 of 384 by tsty on Tue Mar 16 10:57:46 2004:

and who is 'we'?
  
 % ping -c 3 arbornet.org
PING arbornet.org (209.142.209.161): 56 data bytes

--- arbornet.org ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss


#364 of 384 by gelinas on Tue Mar 16 11:59:52 2004:

(I think the "we" is grex, which was taken off-line last night, as described
in the motd.)


#365 of 384 by tsty on Tue Mar 16 18:13:23 2004:

re 364 ... 363 was ref to 359. 


#366 of 384 by salad on Tue Mar 16 18:53:38 2004:

Thanks kip and gelinas !


#367 of 384 by twenex on Fri Mar 19 13:10:15 2004:

Hmm.

Has ttyp0 been fixed? it seems to be working properly.

Contrast this with testerday, when in an effort not to get a borken terminak
I opened several tty sessions simultaneously, intending to close the ones down
htat complained "server refused to allocate pty" once I got a working one.
It took me four goes before I got one I could type into.


#368 of 384 by scott on Fri Mar 19 13:17:01 2004:

Has been awfully quiet around here the last couple of days.


#369 of 384 by twenex on Fri Mar 19 13:17:41 2004:

Is that a problem grexstaff can fix?


#370 of 384 by jor on Fri Mar 19 14:19:39 2004:

No but we have a twitstaff on call.


#371 of 384 by gelinas on Fri Mar 19 22:32:42 2004:

The message "server refused to allocate pty" usually indicates a telnet queue,
which SSH doesn't deal with very well.  Opening several different connections
at once is not going to make it better.


#372 of 384 by twenex on Fri Mar 19 22:33:24 2004:

ahhh... thanks.


#373 of 384 by twenex on Sat Mar 20 20:20:07 2004:

Is that a problem related to SSH in general or just the implementation htat
GREX uses?


#374 of 384 by twenex on Sat Mar 20 20:20:55 2004:

BTW, Grex hasn't rolled over yet.


#375 of 384 by drew on Sat Mar 20 21:33:00 2004:

Speaking of ssh:

psftp: no hostname specified; use "open host.name" to connect
psftp> open grex.cyberspace.org
login as: drew
Sent username "drew"
drew@grex.cyberspace.org's password:
sftp-server: Command not found.
Fatal: unable to initialise SFTP: could not connect
psftp>


#376 of 384 by novomit on Sun Mar 21 00:08:58 2004:

I always get an obscene message when I try to ssh into grex. Plus it is
unbearably slow compared to m-net. 


#377 of 384 by keesan on Sun Mar 21 01:49:03 2004:

Is this some new virus?  And if it is some local vandal, how are grexers
supposed to be reading this anyway?  


From management@grex.org Sat Mar 20 20:47:10 2004
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 20:27:48 -0500
From: management@grex.org
To: keesan@grex.org
Subject: E-mail account disabling warning.


  [Part 1, Text/HTML  12 lines]
  [Unable to print this part]


  [Part 2, Application/OCTET-STREAM (Name: "Text.pif")  28KB]
  [Unable to print this part]




#378 of 384 by gelinas on Sun Mar 21 02:02:55 2004:

Yes, it's a virus.


#379 of 384 by drew on Sun Mar 21 06:45:07 2004:

ssh works for me, sftp does not.


#380 of 384 by styles on Sun Mar 21 18:59:02 2004:

sftp-server is a seperate program which is enabled as a subsystem in your
sshd_config (for openssh, at least).  "sftp-server: command not found"
implies, i believe, that the subsystem directive is there in grex's
configuration, but the program itself is not.  scp should suit your needs,
though.


#381 of 384 by gull on Mon Mar 22 21:27:37 2004:

sftp-server is actually run in the command shell by your ssh client,
when you connect.  This seems to happen *before* your environment is set
up, too, which means there is no path to search.  So your ssh client has
to have, in its configuration, the proper full path to where sftp-server
is *on the remote system*.

I ran into this on FreeBSD.  WinSCP's default for where sftp-server is
located is not the same as where FreeBSD installs it.


#382 of 384 by styles on Tue Mar 23 00:58:00 2004:

same thing.  it's not there.


#383 of 384 by drew on Tue Mar 23 20:38:40 2004:

So where is sftp-server on Grex?


#384 of 384 by gull on Wed Mar 24 00:09:17 2004:

It looks like there isn't one.  Presumably our version of sshd is too
old to have come with it.


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: