Grex Glb Conference

Item 15: a question

Entered by harper on Thu Sep 4 00:52:03 1997:

34 new of 45 responses total.


#12 of 45 by bookworm on Wed May 5 00:39:43 1999:

with Jon and I, it came up in conversation.


#13 of 45 by brown on Thu May 6 05:39:11 1999:

what came up in conv.. ( just to amke sure it is all clear)


#14 of 45 by bookworm on Fri May 7 18:19:44 1999:

The fact that he was bisexual.  I discovered my own sexuality shortly 
after we became engaged.  I guess you could say loving Jonathan helped 
me to put it into perspective.


#15 of 45 by keesan on Fri May 7 22:34:23 1999:

How does one discover one's own sexuality?


#16 of 45 by orinoco on Fri May 7 23:24:46 1999:

People are very good at ignoring things that they don't want to realize, is
what it boils down to.  If I don't like the idea of being anything but
straight, chances are I'll avoid noticing same-sex attractions until something
forces me to notice them.


#17 of 45 by bookworm on Fri May 7 23:34:01 1999:

(ding)That is correct!  Johnny, tell him what he's won!

;)  That is absolutely right.


#18 of 45 by jazz on Sat May 8 04:55:57 1999:

        There's more too it than the obvious, though ... I'm quite straight
and yet during or shortly after relationships, people I've been involved with
have realised their bisexuality.  Which is one of the factors I've
unconsciously included in positing that everyone inherently has the
possibility of bisexuality.  


#19 of 45 by gypsi on Sat May 8 17:29:33 1999:

Keesan - I had always been attracted to women but could never picture myself
having sexual relations with them.  Then, one week a couple of years ago, I
had dreams about it.  I was comfortable and liked it.  I started hanging out
with Rachael a month later when we met in theater, and she was very kind about
going slowly.  I like cuddling her, touching her hips, etc, so I went with
it.  It took that one breakthrough, and I've been "out" ever since.


#20 of 45 by keesan on Sun May 9 00:19:09 1999:

Is it possible for people to change from hetero to homo or bi as they get
older, or do they just realize that is what they were all along?


#21 of 45 by brown on Sun May 9 04:01:54 1999:

hmmmm
<scratches head>


#22 of 45 by i on Sun May 9 11:50:11 1999:

Well, if a girl is raised in a closed, old-fashioned sexist environment
that teaches her that she *will* grow up to be a wife/mother/domestic
servant, then later starts to realize that she can and wants to have a
life and ambitions of her own, would you say that she has changed or that
just her knowledge has changed? 


#23 of 45 by brighn on Sun May 9 15:31:10 1999:

In my opinion, people are gay/straight not because of who they're attracted
to but because of who they're *not* attracted to. Most people, in my opinion,
are "born bi" from the standpoint that they have potential attraction to
either gender. what happens is, IMHO, that they develop an aversion to one
gender or the other as they grow up, either through education, exposure, or
emotional trauma (or some combination thereof).

So, yes, if somebody were to overcome their aversion, they could change
orientation, IMHO.


#24 of 45 by jazz on Sun May 9 15:43:40 1999:

        Based on my undestanding of human sexuality, that's as good a theory
as any, and better than most that I've read.


#25 of 45 by orinoco on Sun May 9 21:39:57 1999:

The general opinion seems to be that you have _a sexuality_ which you
"discover" at some point in your life.  I'm not so sure I believe that,
though.  Even over the course of a few weeks I find myself drifting back and
forth between mostly-straight and mostly-gay; I can't imagine staying even
relatively stable over the course of years.


#26 of 45 by brown on Sun May 9 22:31:49 1999:

.. just wishing for friendships that are
(stable)


#27 of 45 by keesan on Mon May 10 21:29:38 1999:

Supposedly some people 'outgrow' being gay.  Is this an actual change or have
they just made a decision not to act on their true feelings?  I had a
short-term housemate who went to a psychiatrist to be talked out of being gay
- this failed, no surprise.


#28 of 45 by gypsi on Tue May 11 05:20:33 1999:

Being "talked out of being gay" would be as easy to do as talking me out of
being a brunette.  It's not one of those things that can be changed very
easily.  Why did they want to be talked out of it, btw?


#29 of 45 by keesan on Wed May 12 01:00:31 1999:

I think he wanted to be 'normal'.  He seemed normal to me, except for being
around 6' 5".  I find normal sort of boring.


#30 of 45 by brighn on Wed May 12 02:03:28 1999:

Um, Sarah, they sell bottles in any drugstore. People change their hair colors
every day. Bad analogy. =}


#31 of 45 by gypsi on Wed May 12 02:56:05 1999:

Pbbbbttt...  :-P~


#32 of 45 by jazz on Thu May 13 12:52:03 1999:

        Actually, there are several clinical success stories.  Take that
however you want it.  I suppose it depends on the individual - though sexual
definitions tend to be proffered as invariable parts of one's being, they
aren't always, and at least one clinical success that I've read transcripts
of dealt with a man who was gay, as far as I can tell, because of a
deep-seated fear of, and inability to deal with, women.  His choices in
partners reflected this fear - they were 'punks'.  It took several years to
get his life together, and he chose to be straight rather than bisexual,
insofar as his choices in partners.


#33 of 45 by lumen on Fri May 28 04:36:37 1999:

To tell my side of the story..

As I told you, I was fairly aware that I was bi when I was about hmmm.. 
in the secondary grades.

I was *never* really comfortable with it, and I was beating myself up 
until a few years back.  I began to develop the idea that no 
self-respecting woman of my faith would ever love me if she found out I 
was bi.  I eventually told someone I was dating around that time, but 
she was much too young (jailbait) to take it.

What I found out was this-- telling your girlfriend that you are 
bisexual can be perceived as a threat.  Not only is there the danger 
that you might cheat with a woman, but there is the possibility that you 
might cheat with a man.  The urges are always there, and my psychiatrist 
told me that it is a real issue in a relationship.  From what I've 
guessed, most women want stability and security, and having a bisexual 
partner presents a real challenge.

First and foremost, I think you need to reassure her that this will not 
destroy your relationship if and when you tell her, and you need to talk 
about options.

I do think "training" is a good idea-- to gradually introduce it into 
the picture of who you are.  For most of us here, activism isn't an 
all-consuming goal; if you're the same, it should be fairly easy to show 
that you're like everyone else.

I brought it up with Julie when I was having problems in my 
relationship.  I think the issue of sexuality had been making cracks, 
since the poor girl I was dating seemed jealous.  I had opened my big 
mouth again, but an old buddy of mine had been hitting on me really hard 
for quite some time and was crestfallen when I told him I was dating a 
girl.  Oh hell, I'll call him an old boyfriend-- even though we never 
did get much past the friendship stage.

Julie understood-- she said she'd thought about women.  She had 
volunteered for an AIDS care hospice before, so she had been educated.  
Both of us have relatives and siblings who are gay, lesbian, or bi.  As 
she said, she came out to me a little while after we got engaged, and we 
started attending GALA.


#34 of 45 by jazz on Fri May 28 12:37:24 1999:

        There are a lot of issues involved with a person in an established
relationship "coming out" as bisexual ... running the gamut from general
homophobia and the good 'ol Chasing Amy "Passive-Agressive Gay Bashing"
syndrome, to the decision some bisexuals have made that because they are
interested in two genders, that monogamy for them is having one partner of
each gender.

        But, then again, this is Ann Arbor, and for a while I was convinced
that all women were, a priori, bisexual because of the locals.


#35 of 45 by brighn on Fri May 28 23:27:36 1999:

I've heard that said, too, about bisexuals and monogamy. That's absurd.
Monogamy means commitment to a single person.


#36 of 45 by jazz on Sat May 29 02:00:22 1999:

        You're just miffed because they aren't admitting to polyamory. :)


#37 of 45 by brown on Tue Jun 1 04:46:14 1999:

<bob rolls his eyes and runs for cover


#38 of 45 by brighn on Tue Jun 1 05:22:37 1999:

Not miffed. Annoyed would be a better word, yes. 
=}



#39 of 45 by lumen on Wed Jun 2 01:27:40 1999:

Well, I guess it would be a question of monogamy vs. polyamory, then.  
You have to decide whether or not others will be allowed in, and if yes, 
what the terms need to be.

I have heard of some couples where one informs the other if there is to 
be a fling, and usually, the outside party is informed that it is solely 
a physical attraction and not a long-term thing.

Keeping the relationship stable seems to be the overarching issue.


#40 of 45 by bookworm on Fri Jun 11 23:19:33 1999:

pardon my confusion, Paul, but are you saying that bisexuality and monogamy are
absurd or that people's belief that bisexuals cannot have  a monogamous
relationship is absurd?  Personally I vote the latter, seing as I am a bisexual
in a monogamous (committed to one person)  relationship.


#41 of 45 by lumen on Fri Jun 11 23:45:50 1999:

My wife is so secure in that decision-- wish I was.  But we wish not to 
jeopardize the good things we have in our faith.


#42 of 45 by brighn on Sat Jun 12 05:15:50 1999:

I'm saying that if you have a relationship with two people, you're not
monogamous, regardless of the genders of the two people you're having
relationships with.

Of course bisexuals can be monogamous; bisexuals can be celibate, too.


#43 of 45 by cyberpnk on Mon Jun 14 18:01:39 1999:

On the next Jerry Springer......


#44 of 45 by lumen on Mon Jun 14 18:20:08 1999:

ack!  no..I remember a show on bisexuals and their relationships once..


#45 of 45 by bookworm on Sat Jun 19 20:24:24 1999:

I despise Jerry Springer.  

resp:42 Paul, I think we've reached an agreement.  <shakes his hand>


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: