Grex Glb Conference

Item 1: Introduction

Entered by brighn on Thu Oct 31 18:30:16 1996:

90 new of 406 responses total.


#317 of 406 by omni on Sat Jun 26 17:24:27 1999:

  Thanks, Sarah!

<huggles sarah>


#318 of 406 by dpawley on Sat Jun 26 22:02:41 1999:

<hugs Jim, then gives him a macho clap on the back>

Congratulations, Jim!

I know what it's like to have a highly un-homo-friendly family...I remember
a couple of years ago, watching something on t.v. regarding the Gay Olympics,
and hearing the following two comments come rapid-fire from two family
members:

"Now, THOSE are the Olympics that NEED to be bombed!"

"Where's a well-placed nuclear missile when you need one?"

It's like, two hard smacks in the face right in a row.  I decided then and
there that most of my family is never going to know about my sexual
orientation until I'm ready to finally say, "To hell with them" and let them
go.  Because I know I'll be totally shunned by them.

Anyway, if you need to talk or anything, feel free to drop me an e-mail.

<hugs Jim again>


#319 of 406 by brown on Sun Jun 27 03:12:39 1999:

glad to see ya come out of the woodwork..
'lot of of have been there.
and what? shall we make it a group hug? ;)
ta-ta


#320 of 406 by omni on Sun Jun 27 03:23:20 1999:

  I'd like that. I'd like that a lot.



#321 of 406 by gypsi on Sun Jun 27 08:29:55 1999:

<gypsi hugglepounces Bob and drags Jim, Dale, and Brighn in with them>


#322 of 406 by orinoco on Sun Jun 27 17:16:30 1999:

<belatedly joins the hugglepouncepile>

Congratulations, Jim, and I hope we see more of you around the conference.


#323 of 406 by omni on Sun Jun 27 17:39:00 1999:

  You will now that I have the courage to be proud of who I am. For so long,
I have felt like this was weird, but I now know that I'm not the only one who
is bi. I am in very good company.


#324 of 406 by lumen on Sun Jun 27 23:07:22 1999:

Jim, I am SO pleased, especially since it's not easy to be bi even in 
the community.  Of course, you see that I do empathize, being bi myself 
:)  I think I had hints before I was twenty-- but I was very concious 
about when you were-- I was 18 or so.

Feel free to also send e-mail if you need to talk-- I'd be interested in 
hearing what you have to say about how you are and how things are going.

btw, my wife and I have come even closer to accepting ourselves (she is 
bi too) and finding solutions that work.


#325 of 406 by omni on Mon Jun 28 05:22:58 1999:

  I forgot to add one more little detail. 

<jumps back in with the sharks>

  I'm also a Transgendered person. Ok, I've said it. No getting around that.
In addition to being bi, I have had feelings that I am someone else, of a
different gender. It's not because of anything I wear, or can't seem to grow,
just that my brain thinks in girl mode, and thinks I am a girl. I've done a
lot of soul searching and I always come back to the same place. 
  I guess it came into being when I turned 14. It wasn't as strong as it is
now. I kept it under wraps because in 1974, there was no Boy George, Elton
John still appeared to be straight and no one in Detroit talked about being
bi and transgendered. My father, though he was a stellar dad, still would not
have approved of what I was doing, and you know about my Mom and sister. 
  It wasn't until I was 22 that I ditched my plain white jockeys for panties.
It has been that way since 1982 right until today. I have never made any
apologies for that I am not about to start. Lately in recent years I have
become obsessed with bras, slips and all the other things. I've been thinking
about the difference between transvestism, and transgenderism; I think I come
down more on the TG side than the TV side, since wearing panties and other
things is the norm not the exception, and I get no thrill at all from wearing
lingerie. I just like it. However, labels are for dogfood, not people.

  well, there it is. Thanks to lumen for giving me the courage to do this.
I don't think I ever would have if not for him. I know you'll all be
understanding about this, and thanks for that.


#326 of 406 by keesan on Mon Jun 28 13:10:58 1999:

I commend you on your courage, Jim.   I know how hard this has been for you,
deciding to come out on both issues at the same time.  You are breaking new
ground in this conference.  Is it time for a separate item on TG and TV
issues?  Or maybe on how clothing and gender interact?   How would other
people feel if they were forced all their lives to wear clothing that did not
express the real them?  (For instance, how would a butch woman feel about
having to wear frilly dresses and high heels?  Are there gay men who would
feel really awkward in a business suit or tuxedo?  Are women given a wider
choice in how they dress than are men and how has this changed over the
years?)


#327 of 406 by brown on Mon Jun 28 16:02:57 1999:

well, generally, women can wear anything and get away with it.
'frilly dresses' to 'tuxedos' jeans and a 'T' to punk-wear
guys have (socially) about half the choices


#328 of 406 by gypsi on Mon Jun 28 17:25:37 1999:

He has a point.  I've even worn boxers at times because they're more
comfortable under certain clothes, but the only comment I got was, "Chicks
are cute in boxers/men's clothing."  That was from my boyfriend at the time.
I knew a couple of guys who wore long, "hippie" skirts in the summer because
they are so much cooler than shorts, and they never got razzed because
everyone got so used to seeing it.  Plus, it *was* a2.  =)


#329 of 406 by dpawley on Mon Jun 28 19:44:57 1999:

*makes a mental note to take a trip to a2 very soon* :)



#330 of 406 by keesan on Mon Jun 28 21:15:22 1999:

One guy used to wear kilts to contra dances.
How about a separate item on clothing, and one on transgender issues?
I will start the latter.


#331 of 406 by lumen on Mon Jun 28 21:33:47 1999:

I also agree with Bob-- guys really are socially limited in what they are 
allowed to wear.  Gay men will try to push the envelope, but even they 
only do so in certain circumstances and environments.


#332 of 406 by mooncat on Mon Jun 28 22:10:45 1999:

(kilts aren't considered skirts though. <grins>)



#333 of 406 by orinoco on Mon Jun 28 23:32:52 1999:

I imagine the main reason that guys have "half the clothing options" is that
most styles of dresses would look terrible on a guy's body.  Skirts are
different - I remember not too long ago seeing a skater-clothing company
trying to get skirts for guys to catch on, I guess on the basis that they're
like baggy jeans, only even baggier.  But I can't think of a single style of
dress that would look decent on someone with no hips and no breasts.



#334 of 406 by brighn on Tue Jun 29 04:58:49 1999:

I'm an online transvestite.
I have a female personthat can only really be expressed in fantasy and text,
because her body type is so different than mine.
(female persona, that is)


#335 of 406 by keesan on Tue Jun 29 18:29:03 1999:

Why is your physical body so important to how you can express yourself?


#336 of 406 by jazz on Tue Jun 29 20:16:11 1999:

        It's not just the styles of clothing that would look good on one gender
or another, it's also the fabrics, and patterns, and even the amount of
variation from the basic type of clothes.  I've often bemoaned that men's
clothing tends to be far too dull for my tastes.  That doesn't mean that I've
any desire to wear women's clothing, merely to expand the fabrics, colors,
patterns, and selection of men's.


#337 of 406 by orinoco on Tue Jun 29 20:55:10 1999:

Okay, that much is true; I've often had the same complaint.


#338 of 406 by lumen on Tue Jun 29 21:09:29 1999:

That's just another facet of the dilemma.  More often than not, men's 
clothing tends to remain in conservative colors-- the only noteable 
exception is the necktie; you may have noticed that much splashier 
combinations of colors have been accepted for business and church wear.
I think the main thing is that society generally discourages men from 
enjoying fashion-- clothes are generally meant to be functional, and if 
it is fashionable, it is more to create a particular professional image.
Clothing is more serious or suitable than fun.


#339 of 406 by mooncat on Wed Jun 30 05:37:27 1999:

I think the physical body is important in how you can express yourself
because it's honestly the first thing people see.  Your clothing can
make a statement about who you are.  If you're going to a job interview
you may find it helpful to 'dress the part,' you wouldn't want to go to a 
high class office building and wear torn jeans and a t-shirt. <shrugs>
If you want attention you can wear 'flashy' clothes, or tight-fitting ones
or low-cut ones.  Whether you really like it or not, or personally care
about it, other people will attribute things about you (initially at least)
based on what you wear.



#340 of 406 by brown on Wed Jun 30 15:45:15 1999:

<bob mumbles somehting about needing a new wardrobe tehn wanders off>

p.s. for sarah, all the chicago-visitning A2'ers i know have skirts
haven't got me in one, yet... we'll see


#341 of 406 by bookworm on Wed Jun 30 18:26:21 1999:

Congrats, Jim.  Sorry, I'm so late, but I've been too busy to be able to 
think.



#342 of 406 by jazz on Wed Jun 30 23:00:39 1999:

        Right, your physical first impression is a factor of how you dress and
how well you're built to wear what you're wearing, along with how you hold
yourself and move ...


#343 of 406 by omni on Thu Jul 1 06:02:38 1999:

  I'm still miles from going out "dressed". In fact, I'd have a hard time
passing for female. It'd be like Orson Welles trying to pass as Twiggy. That
dog just don't hunt, and I'm cool with it. However, I can still wear
nightgowns to bed, a bra and a pair of panties under what looks like male
clothes but are actually womens. I'm very comfortable with that. One day, I
would like to have a dress just for around the house, or maybe a suit of some
kind. Kiwanis is an excellent place to find these things since I really don't
want to put any money into it. I would like to have a knee length skirt, as
well.


#344 of 406 by keesan on Thu Jul 1 21:56:12 1999:

Obviously you are not wearing things in order to affect how other people treat
you, but to make yourself feel right.  Would you want to try explaining how
men's and women's clothing affects how you feel about yourself?  I expect
almost everyone cares about what they are wearing even when nobody else is
looking at them.


#345 of 406 by omni on Sat Jul 3 05:21:10 1999:

    I wear clothes for comfort. I have not worn a suit in at least 20 yrs,
at my Dad's funeral. When I got home, the suit went into the closet, and was
never heard from again. Since then I've been wearing jeans and t-shirts almost
exclusivly. I've also been spending some time in sweats. I used to love jeans.
I just need to buy a few pairs.
    I don't know what prevents me from wanting a suit. Maybe it's the sight
of Dad lying there in his casket with clean fingernails and well groomed.
Maybe I'm rejecting that image. I don't know. I never saw my Dad act
comfortable in a suit, and as soon as the event that required that suit was
over, off it would come. I don't think my dad ever had these feelings, but
I sure did.
    The feelings were strongest when my sister got to do girl things, and I
didn't. I was left to go play with the dogs, or my non-existant friends. My
childhood was a hell, and so are dealing with these feelings. At least I'm
not alone here. 
    I always wanted to wear a skirt and pantyhose, or wear a nice jacket with
padded shoulders with a pair of nice designer jeans, that is, over my standard
issue bra and panties. 


#346 of 406 by gypsi on Sat Jul 3 09:01:10 1999:

Actually, it is quite acceptable for a guy to wear a nice jacket over jeans
with a t-shirt.  It's dressy without being dressed up.  A lot of people do
that when going out for the evening.


#347 of 406 by jazz on Sat Jul 3 11:21:21 1999:

        It's surprisingly cheap to do, too, if you're willing to shop at Value
Village for sport jackets from the sorts of people who neverwear them.


#348 of 406 by keesan on Sat Jul 3 14:47:01 1999:

Jdeigert refuses to wear a suit, he does not own one and will not go to
anything that requires one.  He wore a tie once in 15 years, when required
by the chorus.  His brother handpaint it, in fancy script down the front,
mirror image.  It read BULLSHIT (nobody noticed, the script was that fancy).
I was forced to wear panty hose to weddings when I was little and have not
worn any since.  I was also required to wear skirts to school for 13 years
in all weather.  I wish people would not dictate what other people had to
wear.
        Omni, other than suits, can you think of any clothing that is now
restricted only to men, and if so, how would you feel about wearing it?


#349 of 406 by omni on Mon Jul 5 06:51:44 1999:

  Tuxedos come to mind, and you wouldn't catch me in one in a hundred years.
No sir. I am one of those people who is happy in a t-shirt, and jeans and
little else. I never liked dressing up (that is in male clothes.)
  When I was in military school, I had a uniform to wear, and I really hated
it. I had to wear it home, and when I was traveling on Greyhound to Monroe
and back. 
  Maybe all this is coming from me wanting to distance myself from my
childhood as much as possible. In any case, I'm having fun with what I'm doing
and as long as I'm breaking any laws, who really cares what I wear?


#350 of 406 by bookworm on Tue Jul 6 20:11:21 1999:

Tuxedoes are just fancy dressed up suits, Omni.  I'd like to see you in an
evening gown.  For ideas I suggest the movie,  "To Wong Foo..." That movie
about the three cross dressers.

Lot's o material there, I'd guess. (don't ask me.  I'm geneticallly female)


#351 of 406 by omni on Wed Jul 7 05:25:00 1999:

  <rotfl> No, you don't want to see me in an evening gown. That's really a
scary image, even for me. I'm your basic t-shirt, jeans, bra and panties sort.
I saw parts of To Wong Foo, and I was turned off by it. I really don't need
ideas on what to wear. I have been wearing the same basic thing for a long
time, and I know what works. There are certain occaisions where I'd like to
wear a skirt instead of pants (The last few days, I really wanted to wear a
skirt just so I could be cooler). 
   I've been ignoring my feelings for so long it's not funny. I need to get
in touch with my feelings on this and start being sensitive again. 


#352 of 406 by lumen on Wed Jul 14 03:58:32 1999:

resp:347  I'll have to consider that, then.  I wonder if it's true that 
most white guys don't seem to enjoy wearing suits-- the term has been 
used to label those whose wear them quite disparagingly.  Note that 
dress-down days are more the norm.

I don't remember too many guys who wore zoot suits.  Black guys seemed 
to be crazy about them for a while when Arsenio Hall wore one.  They 
were in really loud colors, too.

What I found interesting was that a few of the gay and bi guys I knew 
wore suits and dress clothes of non-conservative shades.  I have this 
theory that some folks think straight guys don't wear purple suits.

I don't know.  Regarding tuxedos, I like 'em.


#353 of 406 by gypsi on Wed Jul 14 05:25:38 1999:

Tuxedos are yummy, but I highly prefer a vest and button cover to a cumberbund
and bow tie.


#354 of 406 by jazz on Wed Jul 14 12:20:14 1999:

        See, I love business suits but I hate tuxedoes.  Go figure.


#355 of 406 by brown on Wed Jul 14 13:16:11 1999:

...and i just love to play dress-up given an opportunity


#356 of 406 by orinoco on Wed Jul 14 15:22:51 1999:

<laughs>
Yeah, cummerbunds are kind of goofy looking.  They're one of those pieces of
clothing that make you wonder what inspired someone to try wearing something
that looks like that.  


#357 of 406 by omni on Wed Jul 14 16:26:07 1999:

 r 346- You misunderstood. I was talking about wearing women's designer jeans,
a woman's jacket, and boots, with all the appropriaate lingerie. 

   About 2 yrs ago, I bought silicone breast enhancers to fill out my bras.
They have made a world of difference, and go a long way with completing the
image.They are cheap, and don't fit really well. I would like, and I am
planning on getting a more expensive pair that will go a long way with my
look. 


#358 of 406 by gypsi on Wed Jul 14 17:47:39 1999:

<birdy also loves to play dressup>  Bob - one of these years, we should go
to an opera in Toronto and get all decked out.  It would make us feel "upper
class" for one night.  =)


#359 of 406 by brown on Wed Jul 14 18:32:00 1999:

yer on, gonna haffta go 1st class all da way, and eat mac and cheese for a
month afterwards ;)

BTW re: #356 cummerbunds were meant to be worn pleats up to catch any crumbs
that may have fallen before thet got to you lap, or stained the shirt.. one of
those items that usta haffa function


#360 of 406 by orinoco on Wed Jul 14 23:06:59 1999:

Wow...most impressive...


#361 of 406 by lumen on Wed Jul 14 23:20:21 1999:

re:359 No, cumberbunds were used by theater ushers who put ticket stubs 
in them.  Now you know why the folds point up :)

Trust me, this is true


#362 of 406 by jazz on Thu Jul 15 00:58:51 1999:

        Hmm.  Merriam-Webster says the term originated in 1616 from the Hindi
"kammar" (waist) and "band" (band).  Apparently it was originally, well, a
waistband.


#363 of 406 by gypsi on Thu Jul 15 06:28:51 1999:

Woohoo!  I'll track down a schedule. =)


#364 of 406 by lumen on Fri Jul 16 23:21:01 1999:

re:362 Ah, well, that's quite possible.  But I was referring to its 
recent incarnation.


#365 of 406 by morgaine on Tue Nov 2 23:52:02 1999:

Hi hi hi. You all probably know who I am already. LOL
Ha ha, John, your dictionary definition of cummerbund matches mine.


#366 of 406 by mooncat on Wed Nov 3 14:45:03 1999:

Hey Melissa, I see you did manage to find your way here. :)



#367 of 406 by morgaine on Wed Nov 3 22:10:27 1999:

Yuh....once I realized it wasn't gbl... LOL


#368 of 406 by mooncat on Thu Nov 4 13:55:18 1999:

<grins>



#369 of 406 by morgaine on Sat Nov 6 16:07:36 1999:

Whatchoo grinning at? :)


#370 of 406 by mooncat on Sat Nov 6 17:43:24 1999:

Nuffin



#371 of 406 by jazz on Sun Nov 7 16:50:16 1999:

        Someone's got an exposed nuffin here?


#372 of 406 by mission1 on Fri Mar 17 09:20:28 2000:

Hi to all grex users


#373 of 406 by brown on Thu Apr 27 19:09:01 2000:

HEYA!

wow this conf. be dying again


#374 of 406 by jazz on Fri Apr 28 07:07:13 2000:

        Heh, silence = death.


#375 of 406 by mooncat on Fri Apr 28 13:42:34 2000:

Well don't wake the dead.


#376 of 406 by orinoco on Fri Apr 28 13:59:47 2000:

<smirks>
I believe now would be the time for someone to claim that the conference is
only napping, or comatose, or having a near-death experience, or posessed by
demons, or some such.


#377 of 406 by snowth on Wed May 3 03:55:06 2000:

Me personally, I think it is undergoing psychiatric help, and can't be
bothered with itself as it searches for it's untold childhood trama.


#378 of 406 by orinoco on Wed May 3 14:54:28 2000:

Yeah, that must be it.


#379 of 406 by void on Mon May 8 02:06:51 2000:

   either that or the fw was marching around in washington d.c. last
weekend and also managed to lose two passwords.  :)


#380 of 406 by micklpkl on Tue Oct 3 20:14:55 2000:

I sincerely hope that this conference is only napping, and not truly dead.
Mostly, because I'm relatively new here, only been grexing for a little over
a month. I've seen many of you posting in other places, or in party, so now
it's time to introduce myself.
I'm Mickey, I'm gay (never been with a MOTOS) and married to a great guy for
10 years now. We live in Austin, Texas. 
It's really good to be here. Here's hoping together we can spark some
friendly discussion in this conference, soon.


#381 of 406 by brighn on Tue Oct 3 20:31:32 2000:

It's sleeping. There are obviously people who are reading it... start a convo
and maybe we'll pick up on it.
Welcome, btw.


#382 of 406 by birdy on Thu Oct 5 05:02:46 2000:

I'm still here.  =)


#383 of 406 by orinoco on Thu Oct 5 15:19:34 2000:

Where am I? :)


#384 of 406 by mooncat on Thu Oct 5 19:35:25 2000:

I don't know


#385 of 406 by snowth on Mon Oct 9 18:25:35 2000:

I am here, therefore, none of you can be, because I am the only one in the
room at the moment.

To Eat Good Coffee, press here.

Thank you very much.


#386 of 406 by brown on Wed Nov 29 16:07:17 2000:

 <bob presses for good coffee>
 .. and hopes it aint too cold yet


#387 of 406 by orinoco on Wed Nov 29 18:07:28 2000:

<nyurgh....> 

Coffee?


#388 of 406 by snowth on Sun Dec 3 05:21:20 2000:

No, dear. No coffee for you. Go back to sleep.


#389 of 406 by jazz on Sun Dec 3 17:19:46 2000:

        I'm not even human until I have coffee.  You really don't want to
deprive some people of their morning fix, trust me ... :)


#390 of 406 by orinoco on Sun Dec 3 20:21:39 2000:

You shouldn't really trust me to run a coffeemaker until I've had some coffee.
Nor should you trust me to make breakfast until I've had something to eat.
It's a real dilemma.


#391 of 406 by remmers on Mon Dec 4 14:37:06 2000:

Clearly, you need a servant.


#392 of 406 by mooncat on Tue Dec 5 22:21:15 2000:

Hey if he gets one I want one too!!! 


#393 of 406 by snowth on Wed Dec 6 19:09:24 2000:

I can make coffee, but don't _ever_ anyone ask me to cook. Generally speaking,
though, I make a bad servant.


#394 of 406 by orinoco on Wed Dec 6 22:18:14 2000:

As in "...time to find another servant"?

Or as in "...time for a spanking"?


#395 of 406 by i on Wed Feb 7 03:01:07 2001:

User void, the sole fairwitness of this conference, has resigned.  I'll
be around to answer questions, install a new fw if the users here want to
elect one, etc.  


#396 of 406 by thoma on Tue Mar 25 05:55:32 2003:

I am from 
India
I am a not sure which category I am  in in, but definitel know i like
females...


#397 of 406 by i on Wed Apr 2 02:36:08 2003:

Hello, thoma!


#398 of 406 by dcat on Fri Jun 20 06:21:30 2003:

I'm Jonathon (also known variously as Jon and Isaac, the latter of which
is my middle name).  I don't generally care to define my gender or
sexuality.  If stuck in the usual 6-cell matrix, I go with 'bisexual
male', although  I rather prefer just plain 'queer'.  (For one thing, I
find 'bi' to be an ugly-sounding word, and 'bisexual' not only
not-euphonious[1], but strange and difficult to say.[2])

I've very few male friends or acquaintances, so while I know I'm
physically/sexually attracted to men, I've never dated any.  OTOH, I've
had relationships w/ women last between 3 days and 7 months; as of this
writing my current relationship is a week old.  She's at least the third
bi girl i've dated (at least one of whom now dates only women).

[1] Does anyone know what the antonym of the eu- prefix (meaning good or
true) is?  Shirley the word isn't simply 'disphonious'. . . .
[2] Don't know about anyone else, but when I read, I hear the words
spoken aloud, so yes, the audible sound of words really /does/ affect my
writing that much. . .


#399 of 406 by orinoco on Sat Jun 21 16:34:57 2003:

(I think the opposite of "euphonious" is "cacaphonous.")


#400 of 406 by jpwoof on Tue Jan 6 02:06:19 2004:

Hi. I'm new here. I'm 24 years old. Born and raised in the Philippines
but I'm currently living in San Francisco. Hope everyone is having a 
great time. 


#401 of 406 by orinoco on Tue Jan 6 03:16:40 2004:

Hi and welcome.  Things have been a bit quiet here of late, but you never
know... maybe some other folks will come out of the woodwork.


#402 of 406 by jpwoof on Wed Jan 7 01:00:34 2004:

i wasnt really expecting any respons but thanks. i checked the last message
and indeed it was dated way back 19whatever. so anyways... i have to admit
the system is kinda hard to use. hope it's not what's keeping everybody from
writing. 



#403 of 406 by keesan on Wed Jan 7 05:12:43 2004:

Try asking a question and you might get some answers to it.  Or start by
telling us about yourself.


#404 of 406 by yurifan on Sun Jan 11 12:09:38 2004:

Hello everyone. How are you all doing? I have just started usng this program,
and it seems that nobody has been here all to recently except for a few
people. Am I the only one left? Sole surviver? Maybe it would help if we got
more people to join and use tis program...hmm? Please respond!
?


#405 of 406 by keesan on Sun Jan 11 17:31:02 2004:

Lots of people are left.  If you start a discussion about some topic other
than whether there are people here, you might get more responses.


#406 of 406 by springne on Thu Jan 19 16:19:06 2006:

Hi.


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: