1 new of 357 responses total.
Re #238: Please identify some *rational* basis for your belief that an adverse action could occur. Remember, the issue should be weighing the potential harm to jep v. the *established* harm to grex's professed values of free and uncensored speech (with the resultant harm of denying access to someone else in the future who may need such an item much as jep himself said he wished such an item already existed). "Awfulizing" is a form of distorted thinking and not a good basis for rational decision-making. Speculation that has *some* basis in reality is OK, so please share some details. So far though, you have simply made a hollow statement empty of any real meaning. Here's another hint: Jep himself stated his request to keep the items deleted was *not* based on legal concerns.
You have several choices: