1 new of 424 responses total.
Re #102: Here is what I proposed: delete all of jep's posts and print out what remains for his lawyer to review. Your position re the involvement of lawyers is nonsensical in view of *your own* statements that legal liabilities for jep may justify removal. And if you want to approach it from a "let the grexers decide" position, then I think most sane grexers will be more likely to accept an argument based on potential legal liability if a lawyers opinion is actually presented as opposed to your "I am not a layer but I think a lawyer would be bothered by this" argument. Re #106: I'm not going to get into it with you on this jep. If this has all hit such a nerve, then I suspect there are deeper underlying issues you may want to discuss with a counselor. And while I do care about the welfare of children, regardless of whether I know them or not, that is not the main thrust of my argument. I am saying that Grex needs a clear policy as whether a given policy can be over-ridden by a concerned and well-meaning parent. I'm sorry that you are the parent caught up on the controversy. That does not diminsh the importance of the issue being decided, however.
You have several choices: