1 new of 393 responses total.
Perhaps an ongoing policy discussion in the Staff conference would be in order. The idea would be to discuss practical implications of policy changes, and perceptions of implicit changes could be discussed and validated. One of the strengths of Grex is that the policies by which we operate are not vast and complex, but one of the weaknesses of our system is that the fluidity of our policy sometimes results in controversial judgement calls, and over time, resolving those controversies has become a more difficult and noisome process. So the logical responses are either to increase the degree to which our policies are clearly codified, or take steps to insure that there is broad and clear understanding of those policies by those charged with their implementation.
You have several choices: