Grex Coop10 Conference

Item 77: Need a Location for Grex Board Meetings

Entered by janc on Thu Jan 29 20:23:28 1998:

In the past the Grex board meetings have been held in the ITI cafeteria during
most of the year, and in the Michigan Union food court during the summer.

Our former contact person at ITI has left there, and the new people say that
we can only continue to meet there if an ITI employee is present throughout
the meeting.

So we may need to find a new place to hold board meetings.

We'd like board meetings to be in an easily accessible place that new people
would feel comfortable dropping in to.  The Michigan Union has been better
this way than ITI, but except in the summer, it tends to be too noisy to
hold a meeting in.  Most people feel that a private home would not be as
good a place for a public meeting.

Ideas?  Suggestions?
105 responses total.

#1 of 105 by richard on Fri Jan 30 19:24:37 1998:

why not have it at somebody's house...a different board member can
host each month's meeting so nobody is terribly inconvenienced.


#2 of 105 by scott on Fri Jan 30 19:34:29 1998:

...except those that have serious cat allergies.  And also those who wouldn't
feel comfortable going to a house instead of a public place.


#3 of 105 by dpc on Fri Jan 30 19:59:46 1998:

I'd hope we could *avoid* using the Michigan Union, even in the summer.
Not only is it noisy, but holding a board meeting in a cafeteria
is a bit bizarre.  Hm.  Has anyone checked out one of the public 
meeting rooms at the AA District Library?  Or at the County Library
on Hogback?


#4 of 105 by valerie on Sat Jan 31 14:06:27 1998:

This response has been erased.



#5 of 105 by mta on Sat Jan 31 16:07:32 1998:

There's also the point that at a public place people feel more free to drop
by when they're free and leave when they need to.  At someone's home they
might feel that arriving late or leaving early would be disruptive and choose
to stay away if they can't make the whole meeting.


#6 of 105 by jared on Sun Feb 1 00:54:31 1998:

I'm willing to arrange iti space, but the problem i'm going to have 
in the future (and even more) is that I may not always be able to
be there, and ITI doesn't like that much.


#7 of 105 by gibson on Sun Feb 1 04:19:53 1998:

         Check with Holidays on W Stadium. The owners are nice people to deal
with. The wife is Sofia the tailor.


#8 of 105 by davel on Sun Feb 1 14:37:37 1998:

Re #5 & #4: balancing what Misti said, some people may feel awkward meeting
in a restaurant if they're not planning to buy anything.  That said, many
restaurants are likely not to mind at all if most people in the group do so.


#9 of 105 by aruba on Sun Feb 1 22:06:28 1998:

The main problem with meeting in a restaurant, IMO, is the noise.


#10 of 105 by krj on Mon Feb 2 02:14:25 1998:

Is the upstairs room at Zingerman's Next Door available?  
Grex used to meet there eons in the early 90's.


#11 of 105 by steve on Mon Feb 2 04:44:46 1998:

   It would be fun to go there, one more time (for ols times sake)
while we find some new spot, I'll say that.


#12 of 105 by davel on Mon Feb 2 11:54:38 1998:

**Noisy**


#13 of 105 by valerie on Mon Feb 2 14:50:58 1998:

This response has been erased.



#14 of 105 by other on Mon Feb 2 18:44:01 1998:

the back room at the gypsy cafe is usually pretty quiet, unless there is a
show going on...  then there's the mars room at drake's.  oops, guess not...
did someone mention the possibility of a room at the library?
perhaps at a university library?  


#15 of 105 by mta on Mon Feb 2 21:20:15 1998:

I know that Briarwoord has meeting space, though I know nothing about what kind
of arrangements would be involved.  On the place side, it's a reasonable
central location, it would be quiet and private, yet a public space, and no
need to order food.

On the downside we'd probably have to be done by the time the mall closed at 9
-- and while we often are, not always.  Also there may be a charge.


#16 of 105 by dpc on Tue Feb 3 01:51:05 1998:

The Gypsy Cafe should be looked into.  My only problem with the back room
is the really loud compressor of some kind.  But they'll turn that off
if you ask.


#17 of 105 by steve on Tue Feb 3 05:08:10 1998:

   Yeah, I remember that session at Zingerman's.  Incredible.  Still,
one last foodfest at Zing's...?  (sigh, I know--it isn't practical)

   We should talk to Arnold Barr about county space perhaps.

   Also, the People's Food Coop has space downstairs.  Would
that make any sense Valerie? I don't know what their policies are.


#18 of 105 by valerie on Tue Feb 3 15:09:50 1998:

This response has been erased.



#19 of 105 by rickyb on Wed Feb 4 16:54:30 1998:

Is it _possible_ to use a conference room at the NEW Center even though the
grex non-profit is not a tenant?  I don't know the answer to this.

Arborland Mall has a meeting room (downstairs) which may be more available
(time, $) than Briarwood, and just as convenient.  The Main library, YMCA or
University sites are also good ideas.

If it's not too far off the path, and _some_ people desire to have food
available (or drink?), Banfields on Packard Rd, just east of Platt has a "back
room" full of pinball machines and stuff (might be noisy...depends on the
timeing) and they also have a sizable room downstairs which i think they use
to rent out, but might make it available to a group such as grex since they
are very neighborly and could get some sales of ROH or food to make it worth
their while).

(isn't there a lower level in that coffee shop on the corner of East U and
South U, next to Ulrichs?  Maybe that is available?)



#20 of 105 by mta on Wed Feb 4 18:12:14 1998:

The problem with Banfields is that it's often very noisy and always very smokey
in the back room.  (I know.  I spend more time than I want to think about there
these days.)

Downstairs might be better, I don't know. Probably will have remants of smoke
there, though.


#21 of 105 by jep on Wed Feb 4 19:35:07 1998:

NEW Center charges for conference room space unless you are a tenant 
there.


#22 of 105 by aruba on Wed Feb 4 20:37:26 1998:

I was at the library yesterday, so I asked about meeting rooms.  They have
three, two on the 4th floor and the "multi-purpose" room in the basement.  One
of the ones on the 4th floor looks like it might be about the right size for
us.  However, the library closes at 9 each night, and I presume they'd kick
us out then.


#23 of 105 by remmers on Wed Feb 4 23:03:25 1998:

I haven't been to a board meeting recently. Do they tend to last more
than 2 hours? If not, a 7pm starting time at the libary would work.


#24 of 105 by keesan on Sun Feb 8 23:44:50 1998:

Please choose something within walking distance of downtown, rather that
Arborland or Briarwood, so that non-drivers can attend.  Would a weekend
afternoon work if meetings run too late on weekday eves?   Has anyone tried
a church?  They might charge $25 for two hours use, but this is a lot
cheaper than a restaurant.


#25 of 105 by remmers on Mon Feb 9 00:38:01 1998:

(I can't believe I spelled it "libary" in #23...)


#26 of 105 by e4808mc on Mon Feb 9 01:31:20 1998:

Non-drivers can attend any meeting held within the city limits of Ann Arbor.
The AATA runs 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.  

When the line buses are not running, thye have a shared-cab sytem that costs
$2.00 per person.  It is called NightRide, and can be reached at 663 3888.


#27 of 105 by keesan on Mon Feb 9 04:30:44 1998:

bus fumes make me sick, I would not go to Arborland.  To take Nightride, if
it has not changed, you have to wait outside for up to an hour, which could
leave you alone in the dark and cold after a meeting ended.


#28 of 105 by mdw on Mon Feb 9 09:04:40 1998:

If you ask around, you can likely find somebody willing to drive you
back & forth.  Nevertheless, nice as iti's cafeteria was, getting in the
place always seems to be a bit chancy.


#29 of 105 by valerie on Mon Feb 9 13:03:21 1998:

This response has been erased.



#30 of 105 by remmers on Mon Feb 9 13:40:28 1998:

People may feel that if they go to a restaurant, then they're
obligated to order some food. (Indeed, the restaurant management
may share this view.) For some people, this could be a deterrent
to attending if the meeting is at a restaurant.


#31 of 105 by mary on Mon Feb 9 13:43:31 1998:

I've called Zingerman's and told them about us, that we're a non-profit
doing good stuff for the community, and about our need for meeting space. 
I've told them we used to meet there but found it was often difficult when
we shared the upstairs room with other customers.  Mostly, I was asking if
they offered a reduced fee-type setup for non-profits when she offered to
let us use the space, on a reserved basis, without charge.  They actually
have two rooms up there and either would work for our size group. She
seemed to think this wouldn't be a problem but is going to get final
clearance and call me back.  I told her the meetings were mostly on the
third Wednesday of every month, 7:30 to about 10:00, and we expected less
than 25 people, mostly. 

Is this all corrrect?  If she gives us the go-ahead are we interested? 



#32 of 105 by mary on Mon Feb 9 13:44:27 1998:

John slipped in.  Zing's was told some folks ordered food and/or
drink, but certainly not everyone.


#33 of 105 by keesan on Mon Feb 9 19:08:28 1998:

Public schools will rent out rooms, don't know the times or prices, but I
think it was pretty cheap weekday eves.  the Commmunity Center on Main?
SHould I bother calling them, or is it to be ZIngerman's?


#34 of 105 by remmers on Mon Feb 9 19:39:12 1998:

Re #31: If we can have the space reserved without charge,
that sounds terrific!


#35 of 105 by mary on Mon Feb 9 21:21:15 1998:

Sounded terrific. ;-(

Zing's will reserve us space, without charge, understanding many won't buy
any food or drink. But they close Next Door at 9:00 and we'd need to be
done by then.  There is no way our group could be in by 7:00 and out by
9:00. 

I didn't ask but would assume this offer would only be good Monday thru
Thursday evenings, when that space is often closed anyhow. 

Sorry for the tease. ;-)


#36 of 105 by mta on Mon Feb 9 21:37:15 1998:

A school building might be attractive -- if we could get it free.  I don't
think GREX has the budget for even $25 a month for meeting space on an ongoing
basis.  (I'm sure we could cover it once in a while, though.

I'm not familiar with the community center.  What's that space like?


#37 of 105 by valerie on Tue Feb 10 13:41:05 1998:

This response has been erased.



#38 of 105 by void on Thu Feb 12 07:03:55 1998:

   in wednesday's ann arbor news, there was mention of a rather
cave-like space underneath nick's antique market, which the owner rents
out as banquet space. would it be possible to look into this as a
possible meeting venue?


#39 of 105 by aruba on Thu Feb 12 16:22:47 1998:

Where is Nick's Antique Market?


#40 of 105 by other on Thu Feb 12 22:36:10 1998:

is this the former lohr's on ashley next to the blind pig and stollhaus?


#41 of 105 by cmcgee on Thu Feb 12 22:52:52 1998:

Under stollhaus.


#42 of 105 by keesan on Wed Feb 18 01:21:50 1998:

How many chairs minimum are required for a meeting space?


#43 of 105 by aruba on Wed Feb 18 08:23:00 1998:

I'd say 15 minimum, but 25 would be better.


#44 of 105 by n8qxp on Wed Feb 18 10:01:37 1998:

How about a place like a pondarosa? you can always just a coffee or a pop
there. I should know :-) we used to have cb radio  meetings there and they
have back rooms.. 


#45 of 105 by dpc on Wed Feb 18 21:23:14 1998:

Did anyone check out the County Library on Hogback?


#46 of 105 by janc on Fri Feb 20 15:29:21 1998:

Re #38:  That is Celebration Cellars - my guess is that it would be amazingly
expensive.


#47 of 105 by dpc on Mon Feb 23 17:09:34 1998:

I was at the NEW Center this morning and checked out the availability
of their conference rooms for non-tenants.  Good/bad news.
        The good news is that it only costs $25 for a four-hour block
of time (which can run as late as 11:00 p.m.) in the smallest (west)
conference room.  Plus a $25 refundable deposit.
        The bad news is that these rooms are available *only* to
501(c)(3) non-tenants, which we are not.  <sigh>


#48 of 105 by rcurl on Mon Feb 23 21:08:46 1998:

Say, wasn't someone writing Grex's 501(c)3 application?


#49 of 105 by mta on Mon Feb 23 21:29:26 1998:

As I said before, %25 a month is an additional expense that we just won't be
able to manage long term unless we take donations at the door.  (Which is, lest
you wonder, a VERY BAD IDEA.)


#50 of 105 by robh on Mon Feb 23 22:49:29 1998:

Re 48 - Someone was writing Grex's 501c3 application in 1992,
when I joined.  >8(


#51 of 105 by rcurl on Tue Feb 24 05:39:11 1998:

Yes, I recall who it was, too. It seems to be a disease carried by
form 1023.


#52 of 105 by valerie on Tue Feb 24 07:07:05 1998:

This response has been erased.



#53 of 105 by dpc on Tue Feb 24 15:51:30 1998:

Lest anyone misunderstand me, I do *not* want Grex to become a 501(c)(3),
even if the Board has to meet in the City Hall parking lot!


#54 of 105 by rcurl on Tue Feb 24 17:33:40 1998:

Waffles at ten paces in the parking lot - I think that Grex should definitely
apply for 501(c)3 exemption as soon as possible (and it is called for in
the Articles of Incorporation, though that is not why I strongly recommend
it - it is the advantages to the corporation that are the reasons).


#55 of 105 by mta on Tue Feb 24 19:33:31 1998:

I agree, Rane.  And one of these days we'll get it done...but as you say, 
form 1023 seems to carry a bad caseof intertia with it.  (Maybe even worse than
form 1040 -- that at least has deadlines.)


#56 of 105 by remmers on Tue Feb 24 19:43:27 1998:

Re #53: Why wouldn't you want Grex to become 501(c)3, Dave?


#57 of 105 by davel on Wed Feb 25 02:04:11 1998:

Possibly a bad case of M-net?


#58 of 105 by dpc on Wed Feb 25 14:30:29 1998:

Two reasons why I think 501(c)(3) is a bad idea for Grex.  
First, I don't believe that having that status would motivate people
to donate stuff in order to get the tax deduction.  I base this
belief on M-Net's experience.  We have had a bunch of donations, but
only rarely has anyone asked for a receipt to furnish the IRS.

Second, Grex (like M-Net) would not be a "conventional" 501(c)(3).
We don't provide food to the homeless.  Instead, we provide computer
services to the "computer have-nots".  Even if the IRS granted us
this status, we would leave ourselves open both to political attacks
by twits, and to endless tail-chasing exercises as we tried to interpret
the extremely vague and bizarre IRS rules.

So I don't think the game is worth the candle.


#59 of 105 by rcurl on Wed Feb 25 18:18:08 1998:

Doesn't m-net always send an acknowledgement to donors? If not, no
wonder there isn't much interest in donating! This should be always
be done. 

There are many charitable 501(c)3 organizations that do not service the
poor. The criterion is essentially that the organization provide a service
that government might otherwise could or has to provide for the public
good.  I have never heard of charitable organizations that are not
human-services providers being attacked "by twits". I am or have been an
officer in at least six 501(c)3 exempt charitable non-profits, none of
which served the poor or homeless etc, and in *none* of them did we ever
encounter "endless tail-chasing exercises". In fact, the only time the
status ever entered into our business, it was to our benefit (Adobe
Computers just donated a copy of Photoshop to one of them - 501(c)3 status
was required.) 

It does happen that some agencies may not look upon a non-human-services
charitable organization as deserving of certain benefits. In another of
my organizations, we were denied property tax exemption by a township
because we weren't "a church or scout camp or something like that". We
sued, and won in the Michigan tax court. 


#60 of 105 by dpc on Wed Feb 25 19:27:51 1998:

Sure, M-Net always thanks its donors.  But few people ask for formal
*receipts*.


#61 of 105 by other on Wed Feb 25 20:10:50 1998:

i believe it is standard practice among 501(c)s org's to provide donors with
receipts bearing the tax id number of the org and the amount of the donation
which is deductible.  i have received such from every 501(c)3 to which i have
given, excepting m-net.

i may not wish to take the additional steps to deduct a small donation, but
certainly for anything over $100 it is worth my time.  i am sure others feel
similarly.

m-net got into trouble over it's 501(c)3 because of the conviction of certain
uninformed users that m-net was fraudulently accorded the status because it
was not carrying out formal programs of education and outreach in addition
to providing its basic service function.  grex users tend not to quite so
virulently pursue issues about which they are totally ignorant.


#62 of 105 by janc on Wed Feb 25 21:31:31 1998:

Dave's reason (1) is not a reason *not* to get 501(c)3.  He isn't claiming
they get fewer donations as a direct result of doing it.

Dave's reason (2) I don't agree with.  There is nothing in the rules about
"conventional" and "non-conventional".  There is a list of catagories of
service that might qualify.  I think we fit into them.  The draft application
I started writing describes accurately and completely what Grex has been doing
for the last six years, which is pretty much what it intends to continue
doing.  If the government is willing to accept that as a qualifying 501(c)3
activity, then we certainly should have that status.  If not, we'll get turned
down and be no worse off than we are.  I certainly agree that we should not
be mutating our efforts to try to fit them into a 501(c)3 framework, but I
don't believe that there is anything we are doing or want to do that does not
fit that framework already.


#63 of 105 by rcurl on Thu Feb 26 08:31:58 1998:

Well...you *always* get turned down the first time. It is to test your
mettle (or metal?). They will come back with a whole bunch of additional
questions. This is how they test if an organization is serious and committed.

Yes, the thank you letter should acknowledge the ammount of any monetary
gift. It should *not* state a value for any in-kind (property) donation.
If a monetary gift is more than $250 you must state in the acknowledgement
letter that "no goods or services were provided in exchange for this gift"
or words to that effect. 


#64 of 105 by davel on Thu Feb 26 12:23:28 1998:

What Jan said, with one quibble.  dpc's reason (1) is an argument that 501(c)3
status is really of little or not benefit; given that formally applying will
be a fairly big PITA, that would count as a reason not to do it.

I'd question whether Dave is correct on that one as well, though.  I don't
think the floodgates would be opened, or anything; but Grex operates on a
shoestring.  It's quite easily imaginable that some *one* piece of hardware
might come our way (rather than someone else's) partly because someone wanted
a tax writeoff, which would make all the IRS stuff worth while.  Even failing
that, even that "only rarely" that he allows might make a significant
difference to us.


#65 of 105 by jep on Thu Feb 26 16:49:23 1998:

Making use of a 501(c)(3) designation takes some extra effort.  Even 
having it requires some extra effort.

Arbornet has never had anyone who was willing to apply for grants, 
contact corporations, and push to make good use of it's 501(c)(3) for 
the benefit of M-Net.  Dan Napolitano (keats) applied for and got one 
$7500 grant that allowed Arbornet to take on a new project, but the 
project (the K-12 teacher network) never got the volunteer support it 
needed, and is now long since dead.

Arbornet has been mired for years because Aaron Larson (aaron) has 
pushed to get the organization to comply with the various rules for 
funding and operating a 501(c)(3) designated corporation, and there's 
little interest on anyone's part to work at following those rules.  
There are a lot of rules.  30% of funding has to come from donations 
(not purchases of service such as memberships carrying extra perks), for 
example.  Arbornet's operations are not strictly what the mission 
statement says they should be.  I could go on and on, but you can go 
back and read old policy conferences on M-Net if you want, and get a 
better picture.

Dave is expressing the doubt that the benefits are worth the numerous 
hurdles and requirements.  I agree with him in that I wouldn't want to 
see Grex go through the problems M-Net has had in recent years.  I think 
a 501(c)(3) is a great benefit to the right organization, but I'm not 
sure I think Grex is the right organization any more than M-Net was when 
it took that step.  

M-Net had some pressures at the time, with failing equipment and lack of 
funding, that Grex doesn't have.  M-Net had to do something.  Grex 
doesn't.  It's doing just fine now.

M-Net placed itself under another organization, with an existing 
(and elderly) charter and requirements.  Grex can create it's own  
new 501(c)(3) charter, which may be enough to allow it to be more 
successful.


#66 of 105 by keesan on Thu Feb 26 16:59:12 1998:

The Quaker residence also charges $25 for an evening, and I can check out some
churches as well as public schools.  I calculate that four new members would
pay enough to cover this monthly charge, and we have probably found one (will
know next Tuesday, he promised to pay grex a year's membership if the modem
we plan to install gets him online).  This is 25 cents/month/member.  SHould
I bother checking out pay-for-use places or not?  Most don't care about your
tax status.  Does anyone have connection with the U of M or the student
dormitories - do they offer free use of facilities?


#67 of 105 by keesan on Thu Feb 26 19:18:27 1998:

Commie High closes at 9 and is booked solid.  (Did not check other schools).
 The Ann Arbor Community Center on N. Main is renovating for a few months but
does rent out rooms.  Several churches did not answer (but St. Andrews would
probably charge $25-40).  First Baptist has several rooms available on the
fourth Wed. (other days were all taken) and is open until 10:00.  They can
set up chairs and tables.  The fee depends on several factors but is probably
somewhere around $25, we would have to come in a fill out an application form.
(They also host 12-step programs and an Interfaith Council for Peace and
Justice meeting and are very centrally located.)  


#68 of 105 by rcurl on Thu Feb 26 20:31:54 1998:

Re #64: dues to a 501(c)3 organization are donations (tax deductible)
and it is permitted for members to receive some benefits of membership
that further the objectives of the organization (recent changes in
regulations are useful). There is no burden in Grex meeting the 1/3 rule
and all the other rules, and there are some excellent manual for non-profits
to assist (which are much clearer than the IRS regulations themselves).
It's a win-win thing to do.


#69 of 105 by valerie on Fri Feb 27 05:52:45 1998:

This response has been erased.



#70 of 105 by keesan on Fri Feb 27 18:34:09 1998:

This was for 4th Wed, and I thought the whole argument about tax status arose
with reference to paying $25 to use the NEW center.  I'll keep thinking.


#71 of 105 by srw on Wed Mar 4 02:45:16 1998:

Long ago I promised Grex a $100 donation, no strings attached aside from  
being able to deduct it off of my taxes. The offer is still open. 
Therefore, I am quite certain that it is costing Grex money not to be a 
501(C)(3), although I am saving some (less than Grex is losing though).

I am fully convinced that we qualify, and that there is no good reason 
to be a 501(C)(3).


#72 of 105 by scg on Wed Mar 4 04:30:40 1998:

You mean, "no good reason *not* to be a 501(c)3," right?


#73 of 105 by jep on Wed Mar 4 18:55:21 1998:

Is your pledge intended to push Grex to becoming a 501(c)(3), Steve, or 
do you just strongly believe you deserve a tax break for donating to a 
non-profit?  I'm just trying to understand the motivation here.


#74 of 105 by rcurl on Wed Mar 4 19:22:18 1998:

When one donates money, one donates money. If one is in the 20% tax
bracket, donating $100 costs you only $80, but you have still donated a
net $80.  The only effect of what you call a "tax break" is a gift to the
recipient of federal funds equal to 25% of your personal donation, because
a worthwhile public service is being supported. 

I would be more likely to donate to Grex if it had a 501(c)3 exemption
because of the leverage this would provide for my donation. For Grex to
not accept leveraging donations made to it is not wise financial planning.



#75 of 105 by srw on Thu Mar 5 06:38:47 1998:

Yes I meant  "no good reason *not* to be a 501(c)3,".

It is not a question of my deserving a tax break. I donate to causes 
because I believe in them. I became a Grex member for that reason. 

I believe that my $60/year should be tax deductible, not because I 
deserve anything, but because Grex does. It leverages my donation. The 
way Grex spends my donations compares favorably to the way money I 
donate to many tax-deductible organizations is spent. $60 is more than I 
donate to *any* other non-deductible organization, but far far less than 
my donations to deductible ones. $60 is about as far as I want to go 
without tax deductibility.

I also donate at a low level to a few other non-tax-deductible 
organizations, but none of them are like Grex in almost any way. 

I made my offer in attempt to push grex to get a 501(c)3. I make no 
apology for that. It seems that the state government is also making it 
profitable for grex to pursue that route, and has even outbid me. (See 
the state tax questions elsewhere). While I don't plan on calling or 
raising that amount, my $100 offer stands, to be added to the 
contributions others may make.


#76 of 105 by jep on Thu Mar 5 15:01:45 1998:

I didn't mean to challenge or offend you, Steve, I just wondered as to 
the reasons.


#77 of 105 by dpc on Thu Mar 5 18:21:21 1998:

See?  Another tail-chasing, negative argument about 501(c)(3) status!
Am I clairvoyant, or what?    8-)


#78 of 105 by keesan on Thu Mar 5 21:46:41 1998:

The donations are only tax-deductible if you itemize, and to itemize normally
means that you have to have one or more of:  high mortgage payments, high
property tax, high state taxes.  Many of us would still get no tax credit for
a donation, except that the state gives up to $100 off for dontaions to a
library or university.  Does Grex qualify for state credit somehow?


#79 of 105 by rcurl on Fri Mar 6 02:36:53 1998:

No, Grex would not qualify, as it is not associated with a library or
university (or community foundation). Grex could, however, create an
endowment fund with a community foundations and then donations to that
would qualify for the state tax credit. It is true that the tax-deductibility
is only useful to an individual if they itemize, but it is *very* useful
to the organization because big donors also usually itemize. 


#80 of 105 by aruba on Fri Mar 6 05:58:07 1998:

Jan, how about you and I set a date to get together and work on the 501(c)3
paperwork.  I'll bring over all Grex's financial records, and we can get that
part done.  I suggest sometime later this month; I should be ready for a full
day out in about 2 weeks.  What do you say?


#81 of 105 by janc on Wed Mar 11 17:18:17 1998:

I say OK.  My schedule is flexible.  I think before I last pooped out on this
I had drafts of all the more challenging written parts of the document.  That
means that most of what is left to do is (1) the financial data, and (2)
getting it all printed up on the forms and sent out.


#82 of 105 by aruba on Thu Mar 12 07:01:17 1998:

OK.  I'll send you mail about arranging a time.


#83 of 105 by jiffer on Fri May 1 03:34:15 1998:

Okay, I feel as if i should try to pull a few strings and see about reserving
at least the kids room at Zingerman's if need be.  They are now open till 10p
so that should be no problem... and as long as we get out of there by 10:30
things should be okay.  (Its good to be the employee sometimes.)


#84 of 105 by keesan on Fri May 1 22:20:33 1998:

Sounds wonderful, I will try to make it to the next meeting.  I had no idea
where the ITT cafeteria even was.  Hopefully Zingerman's will get enough extra
business as compensation.  I always buy two bags of bread ends when I go in
there (which is usually just to buy bread ends, they are good and cheap).


#85 of 105 by jiffer on Sat May 2 02:55:12 1998:

what do you look like then keesan??? Long haired good lookin guy? hehe

Yeah, I think alot more people know Zing's location though parking does
sucketh!  If we keep the meetings from 7 till 10ish then we should be okay


#86 of 105 by keesan on Sat May 2 19:45:20 1998:

You got one out of three right on the description.  ZIngerman's is an ideal
location for people who don't want parking, it is walkable.


#87 of 105 by jiffer on Sun May 3 03:17:56 1998:

That is true... how many board members and concerned grex living in walking
distance is hte question.  However, with the coming of summer, parking is
getting better in the evenings, and Commie High Parking is free after 6p!


#88 of 105 by janc on Mon May 4 01:39:17 1998:

Normally we've been meeting in the MUG during summers.  How do people feel
about Zingermans?  I think we used to meet there and had noise problems.  I'd
be willing to try it though.


#89 of 105 by jiffer on Mon May 4 03:04:25 1998:

hmmm... if its under 20 we could close the kids room...


#90 of 105 by valerie on Mon May 4 05:18:31 1998:

This response has been erased.



#91 of 105 by aruba on Mon May 4 05:35:52 1998:

Hmmm - I'm all for keeping the noise down, but I'm afraid if we close the door
it will deter people from joining the meeting if they arrive late, and will
deter people from happening by, because it will be awkward to leave early.
(I know when I'm contemplating trying a new social experience, the first thing
I think about is how easy it will be to get away.  :))

Of course, at ITI no one *does* happen by.  But at the Michigan Union they
do.


#92 of 105 by keesan on Mon May 4 13:43:33 1998:

How about a big sign on the door saying come in, the door is only closed to
keep down the noise levels?


#93 of 105 by aruba on Mon May 4 17:06:20 1998:

Well, that would help.  I'd be willing to try it, certainly.  Maybe we could
alternate between Zingermann's and the Union for the summer, to see which
generates more random arrivals?


#94 of 105 by jiffer on Mon May 4 18:32:38 1998:

I agree with keesan, its not difficult to make a sign to put out there.  And
also, I think grex is relaxed enough  that is someone is going to have to
leave early it isn't going to be akward...

And if we give directions to where the kids room is, people can still arrive
late. 

The kids room is at Zingerman's Next Door, upstairs.  I think you can usually
fit between 10 to 20 people in there...


#95 of 105 by davel on Tue May 5 01:54:17 1998:

That's where we used to meet.  I always found it hard to understand people
(echoes & muzak, I think) even when there weren't other people there talking.
When there were people with kids, or one birthday-party group, it became
impossible for me to follow the discussion.  (I have lots of trouble in
general separating voices from background, so I'm probably worse off than most
everyone else in this regard.  And I'm unlikely to be there, in any case. 
So please understand that I'm mentioning this, not voting against Z's or
something like that.)


#96 of 105 by dang on Thu May 7 20:51:42 1998:

Zings is great for me, seeing as it's only 2 blocks from where I live...
:)


#97 of 105 by jiffer on Fri May 8 00:58:03 1998:

I am assuming that most Grexers live near downtown.  And if the meetings keep
starting at about 7p then parking should be no problem at all.  Commie high
is free after 6p... luckily!


#98 of 105 by remmers on Fri May 8 14:38:22 1998:

(Actually, most Grexers probably live outside the American midwest...)


#99 of 105 by jiffer on Sat May 9 00:10:15 1998:

I meant most *local* grexers  =)


#100 of 105 by davel on Sat May 9 13:02:52 1998:

Even of them, most probably do not live near downtown.


#101 of 105 by rtgreen on Sun May 10 03:38:42 1998:

OK, who wants to take Mark's address list of Grexers, and spend a day with
Mapquest finding lat/long coordinates for all the grexers, and tell us
where the geometric center of grex gravity is?


#102 of 105 by other on Sun May 10 04:49:57 1998:

i have a feeling it would be beneath the crust of the earth...


#103 of 105 by dang on Tue May 12 17:51:10 1998:

(You'd have to take that into account, seeing as we can't move free under the
surface, and find the "center of gravity" on the surface.)


#104 of 105 by other on Wed May 13 00:33:23 1998:

well!  nobody specified a *non-euclidean* calculation!  Harrumph!


#105 of 105 by dang on Thu May 14 18:12:41 1998:

Of course it's a non-euclidian calculation. We live on a non-euclidian
surface, and most of the "distances" we use are non-euclidian. :)


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: