Grex Coop10 Conference

Item 69: New Party Administrators

Entered by valerie on Sun Jan 11 22:21:12 1998:

valerie Jan  8 04:52:27 2004 Valerie Mates valerie Jan  8 04:52:27 2004 Val
valerie Jan  8 04:52:27 2004 Valerie Mates valerie Jan  8 04:52:27 2004 Val
valerie Jan  8 04:52:27 2004 Valerie Mates valerie Jan  8 04:52:27 2004 Val
valerie Jan  8 04:52:27 2004 Valerie Mates valerie Jan  8 04:52:27 2004 Val
valerie Jan  8 04:52:27 2004 Valerie Mates valerie Jan  8 04:52:27 2004 Val
valerie Jan  8 04:52:27 2004 Valerie Mates 
61 responses total.

#1 of 61 by richard on Sun Jan 11 22:33:05 1998:

why does grex need new party admins?  is somebody resigning?  Or
doyou think there just need to be more?  


#2 of 61 by valerie on Sun Jan 11 22:39:25 1998:

This response has been erased.



#3 of 61 by mag on Mon Jan 12 04:41:50 1998:

I'm willing to help out where I can.


#4 of 61 by morpheus on Mon Jan 12 06:05:25 1998:

Well, I can be a party-admin, I suppose...
I meet the qualifications, and I would love to be able to finally get the
things done to my channel that I have wanted done for a while :-)
So, sign me up.


#5 of 61 by romantic on Mon Jan 12 06:17:20 1998:

I would love to be party admin but then you would have to teach me first ;)


#6 of 61 by valerie on Mon Jan 12 15:20:10 1998:

This response has been erased.



#7 of 61 by mag on Mon Jan 12 19:48:25 1998:

It doesn't sound too difficult.  I should be around for a while yet:)  Just
send me some e-mail Valerie if I can be of assistance.


#8 of 61 by agent86 on Mon Jan 12 21:12:53 1998:

ditto above. It sounds easy, if dull and repetitive.


#9 of 61 by remmers on Mon Jan 12 22:22:32 1998:

Yeah, sort of like being a mail carrier. Just don't go postal.


#10 of 61 by snow on Mon Jan 12 23:03:11 1998:

guess I'm entering this conversation a little bit late... :)  I'm sure I'll
be around grex for awhile, so...  I can help out if it's needed :)  I can
always use a new something to do :)


#11 of 61 by dynamo on Sun Jan 18 03:16:47 1998:

Valerie, I'd love to do it. I've been on grex for four years now and Love
being here.. I have asked to be a partyadm In the past but rejected for some
reason. I have scripts to Edit noistabs and auto sort them.. you can look at
them ./dynamo and /dynamo1 in my dir.. I am good wiht unix and Would love to
help if you would let me... And I do plan on being here for a long time.. and
do get on alot... Please let me help where I can... I'm on every night from
8:30 to 11:00 e-mail me or my Aol Instant messenger screen name is Wkhsdrumer.
Let me know Thanks
-Jim


#12 of 61 by valerie on Sun Jan 18 16:29:19 1998:

This response has been erased.



#13 of 61 by dynamo on Mon Jan 19 00:06:06 1998:

Well, Good question Valerie... I edited the progies and gave them to 
him.... for his chan... Nope he's really gone he turned into a big 
druggie and died!

So you need my help!?


#14 of 61 by valerie on Tue Jan 20 05:07:29 1998:

This response has been erased.



#15 of 61 by tsty on Wed Jan 21 10:25:38 1998:

re #13... that last sentence is a metaphor, right; not a reality?


#16 of 61 by dynamo on Wed Jan 21 20:15:18 1998:

 re #15 No Tsty it Is a reality...
Rip


#17 of 61 by winipooh on Thu Jan 22 04:33:36 1998:

I would be honored to be a party adm. I love getting into computer stuff and
I love interacting with all grexers.... I am on all the time too=). Heck since
I live on grex I might as well help out at the same time right? I am friendly
outgoing, well known on grex=), and I work hard..... Drew is also a very good
canidate in my opinion he is very friendly and very intellegent. Thanks=)


#18 of 61 by morpheus on Thu Jan 22 07:23:28 1998:

heh :-)
Thanks for the plug, Megz :-)
To clarify the previous, I am "drew" ;-)


#19 of 61 by winipooh on Fri Jan 23 00:46:42 1998:

No probelmo sweety i love you man=)


#20 of 61 by dynamo on Sat Jan 24 05:11:07 1998:



#21 of 61 by morpheus on Sun Jan 25 16:05:43 1998:

So, whats the current state of the request for partyadmins, Valerie?


#22 of 61 by valerie on Sun Jan 25 17:18:34 1998:

This response has been erased.



#23 of 61 by remmers on Sun Jan 25 18:14:40 1998:

How 'bout following past practice?


#24 of 61 by arthurp on Sun Jan 25 19:34:33 1998:

A staff recommendation to board, and action at the next BOD meeting?


#25 of 61 by davel on Sun Jan 25 21:56:12 1998:

"after much discussion"?


#26 of 61 by janc on Sun Jan 25 22:48:07 1998:

The problem here is that staff is less in touch with the people using party
these days than we used to be.  For many of the candidates, we don't know them
very well, and don't know how they get along with regular users of party. 
The feedback on the candidates that we get here in "coop" is of limited use,
because this person would be dealing primarily with the party crowd who aren't
extremely we represented here.  We need a decision process that brings more
party users into the loop.  That's why the board/staff "needs to figure out
how to make a decision."


#27 of 61 by valerie on Sun Jan 25 23:28:03 1998:

This response has been erased.



#28 of 61 by remmers on Mon Jan 26 00:30:36 1998:

The fact that this was under discussion was well-advertised in
the motd, but not too many partiers showed up here to put in their
two cents, or to volunteer. So maybe it doesn't matter too much
to the typical party person who gets the job. Party doesn't need
a whole lot of administrating anyway, does it? Apart from installing
noises and establishing vanity channels, what is there to do? Things
pretty much run themselves. So maybe the choice doesn't matter very
much, as long as the person knows how to do things and does them
in a timely fashion.


#29 of 61 by scg on Mon Jan 26 06:36:09 1998:

I'm on staff, and spend a fair bit of time in party.  I think I have a fairly
good sense of who most of these people are.  Some other staffers are in party
a lot too. 


#30 of 61 by rcurl on Mon Jan 26 06:42:16 1998:

I'm never in party...but, why not let those in party make the choice?


#31 of 61 by mag on Mon Jan 26 07:43:41 1998:

I don't think the great number of party ravellers care too much who has the
job, as long as they are prompt in meeting their responsibilites.


#32 of 61 by gerund on Mon Jan 26 09:44:40 1998:

John's response (#28) seems accurate to me.  I spend a fair amount of my
time in party and I believe most party users could care less who was doing
the job, so long as the job was being done.


#33 of 61 by valerie on Mon Jan 26 12:48:25 1998:

This response has been erased.



#34 of 61 by remmers on Mon Jan 26 13:35:52 1998:

Then maybe the staff should make the choice based on technical
and people skills. The people in party had plenty of notice that
this issue was up for discussion, but few bothered to participate
in the discussion.


#35 of 61 by gerund on Mon Jan 26 15:50:11 1998:

I agree.


#36 of 61 by arthurp on Tue Jan 27 00:52:55 1998:

And it seems that, mostly, the partiers in here ratify the idea of staff
making a recommendation.


#37 of 61 by beamer on Wed Jan 28 16:16:31 1998:

Well I came to offer my services, not only as a party administrator. I am
willing to help out in anyway that I can.  It seems as though you guys already
have some great canidates, but just in case I am going to tidy up my noisetab.
I think everyone knows me, I am on quite a bit. Well if the party
administrator job has been filled please let me know if there is anything else
I can do. Thanks!


#38 of 61 by winipooh on Thu Jan 29 02:33:33 1998:

i am willing to help out in anyway i am if you hadn't noticed i live here=)
so i am willing to help and i live interacting with everyone it is so cool..


#39 of 61 by mag on Sun Feb 8 05:02:55 1998:

Considering it's been nearly a month since this issue was raised, can we
assume that the problem isn't as serious as was first thought?


#40 of 61 by valerie on Sun Feb 8 15:18:04 1998:

This response has been erased.



#41 of 61 by mag on Sun Feb 8 23:40:20 1998:

Okay, thanks.  I'll look out for news at that time.


#42 of 61 by valerie on Thu Feb 12 13:10:42 1998:

This response has been erased.



#43 of 61 by remmers on Thu Feb 12 17:25:09 1998:

Board approval isn't necessary. The applicable policy on appointments
is as follows (from the minutes of November 16, 1994:

     Motion (remmers, srw):
 
        Staff with permanent root access may at its discretion grant
        specific resources to qualified individuals for the purpose of
        performing work that is beneficial to Grex.  Examples of such
        resources would be write access to selected directories in
        order to modify data files or to install software.  In the the
        event of an emergency, temporary root access may be granted by
        any permanent root.
 
        Permanent root access, access to the staff conference, and
        access to the "baff" mailing list shall be with the advice and
        consent of the Board.
 
        Passed unanimously (6-0-0).
 
Since partyadm's don't get root, staff conference access, or "baff"
mailing list access, the staff can just appoint 'em. 

I wrote the above policy, and was trying to keep bureaucratic machinery
to a minimum.


#44 of 61 by mag on Thu Feb 12 20:30:41 1998:

Kewl, thanks for the update Valerie and rules John:)


#45 of 61 by scg on Thu Feb 12 22:46:14 1998:

Yeah, we know that's how the board vote went, but more recently the board has
aproved party administrator and cfadm candidates, so we felt it was a good
idea to send this to the board for final aproval.


#46 of 61 by remmers on Fri Feb 13 04:05:32 1998:

But at least one person expressed impatience with the slowness of
the process. So although it might be a good idea to send it to the
board for final approval, it might also be a good idea not to.

In any case, just thought I'd point out that the written policy
allows the staff to act on its own here.


#47 of 61 by mag on Fri Feb 13 22:14:35 1998:

Thanks John!  That's very sincere and kind of you.


#48 of 61 by snow on Mon Feb 16 00:00:37 1998:

Glad to know what's going on :)


#49 of 61 by silvakow on Wed Feb 18 21:28:19 1998:

Someone might want to take down the message that shows up on join to chat.
I thought Grex was still looking for admins...


#50 of 61 by mag on Fri Feb 20 07:27:35 1998:

I doubt you phony staff selected me, but either way you can stick my offer
to help out with party admin.  You just really pissed me off.  I won't be
answering anymore !help requests in the future, either.


#51 of 61 by mta on Fri Feb 20 20:43:50 1998:

Did I miss something here?


#52 of 61 by mag on Fri Feb 20 21:59:11 1998:

I want to clarify that not all Grex staff are phony, though decency is in
short supply.


#53 of 61 by valerie on Sat Feb 21 05:45:28 1998:

This response has been erased.



#54 of 61 by mag on Sat Feb 21 09:27:54 1998:

I just e-mailed Valerie before and apologised for letting some personal dramas
interfer in other matters (incl., in particular, this matter!).  I'll
understand if you don't want me fulfilling the position, but if you can forgive
me  I'd gladly take on the responsisibilty of a party admin position.


#55 of 61 by aruba on Sat Feb 21 21:38:35 1998:

I think it's rather important that partyadms not let their personal squabbles
spill over into the execution of their duties.


#56 of 61 by mag on Sat Feb 21 22:14:26 1998:

I agree, Mark...I was rude and I'm sorry for that.


#57 of 61 by snow on Sun Feb 22 01:00:27 1998:

I would just like to throw in my 2 cents and say that I still think that Mic
would do a really go job as a partyadmin.  He's a really cool guy, and well,
we've all got our bad days...I'm not trying to push my opinions or anything,
I just honestly think that he could do a good job.


#58 of 61 by snow on Sun Feb 22 01:04:12 1998:

good even :)


#59 of 61 by mag on Tue Feb 24 21:37:23 1998:

Thanks for your comments, Nissa.  They don't want me, though.  

Best wishes to you and Laura.  At least you were the two other candidates
and I bought to your attention/suggested the nominations:)


#60 of 61 by snow on Wed Feb 25 00:25:29 1998:

sorry Mic, *hug*  well...I tried :)


#61 of 61 by mag on Wed Feb 25 02:45:21 1998:

No problems Nissa.  Life goes on:) (HUGS)


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: