Grex Coop10 Conference

Item 21: PLEDGE DRIVE: Buying Grex a Much Faster Internet Connection

Entered by janc on Thu Jul 24 04:26:43 1997:

It looks like Grex has a really good opportunity to speed up our net
connectivity.  A fellow named Dorian Kim has a very, very impressively
connected home (I think there were T1's to multiple places on the Internet,
but I don't remember the details).  Through Jared Mauch, he has offered to
provide Grex with a 128K ISDN connection, if we pay Ameritech for the ISDN
lines both at our end and at his house, and if we provide the ISDN routers
for both ends of the connection.  This would give us a much better Internet
connection than we have now (currently we have a 28.8K link and the actual
speed up is more than what the numbers alone would suggest, because there
wouldn't be the same compression delays you get with modems).

So this would be a great improvement for Grex, making our net connection for
both incoming and outgoing use much, much faster.

To get the ball rolling, the board authorized the staff to start the work to
get the ISDN line from the Pumpkin to Dorian's place.  Several people present
at the board meeting (Misti Anslin, Steve Gibbard, and Jared Mauch) each
tossed in $40 to cover the phone line installation fees.  It will likely be
three or four weeks before the line can be installed, due to Ameritech delays
and Dorian's vacation plans.

The new connection will also cost us about $50 a month in additional phone
charges.  We think we can cover this, though a few more memberships would
make it a lot easier.

But the line itself won't do us a bit of good without an ISDN router on each
end of it.  These are kind of like the modems on either end of a regular
connection, but they do much more much faster, and, of course, cost more too.
The device of choice in our price range is the Ascend Pipeline P50, so we want
to buy two of these.  (Jared offered us the temporary loan of one, but we
really need to have ones we can keep.)  We expect them to cost under $600 a
piece, not including sales tax and what not.

The board, after much debate, authorized purchase of two ISDN routers on the
condition that we can raise at least $800 of the cost in pledges from users.

Note that if you pledge, you will only be asked to pay if we actually reach
the goal and buy the ISDN routers.  If the deal for the connection falls
through, the you aren't required to pay up on your pledge (though we're
always willing to take money).  But please only pledge if you expect to
be able to pay.  We really expect this deal to finally work (we even have
a backup -- if Dorian changes his mind, Jared has made us the same offer).

So whadya think?  Can we find $800 to buy Grex a faster net connection?
If you can't afford much, please pledge what you can afford.  It adds up.
203 responses total.

#1 of 203 by janc on Thu Jul 24 04:28:57 1997:

I'll start:
   I'll pledge $50


#2 of 203 by aruba on Thu Jul 24 04:35:58 1997:

I'll pledge $40.


#3 of 203 by janc on Thu Jul 24 04:56:54 1997:

Oops, correction:  I should have said "Misti Tucker" instead of "Misti
Anslin".


#4 of 203 by creole on Thu Jul 24 11:30:12 1997:

Who is Dorian Kim and why is he offering this?  What are the risks in this
deal?  What if he pulls the plug after we sink hundreds of dollars into
equipment we won't be able to sell or put to any other use?  Will he be
able to listen in on our traffic?  Something that sounds too good to be
true ...


#5 of 203 by toking on Thu Jul 24 13:06:13 1997:

Those are really good questions <I'm assuming someones gonna answer
them.......>


I'll pledge $20


#6 of 203 by tao on Thu Jul 24 14:18:06 1997:

I'm in for $20.


#7 of 203 by dang on Thu Jul 24 14:23:38 1997:

$20. 


#8 of 203 by tpryan on Thu Jul 24 16:46:04 1997:

        What's the difference between an ISDN modem and a T1 modem?
Where I used to work, at Zantop Airlines has some T1 thingies they
will not be needing RealSoonNow.


#9 of 203 by krj on Thu Jul 24 17:01:03 1997:

I believe there has been a discussion of the details of the ISDN 
proposal in the coop conference.
 
Tim, as brief as possible: ISDN and T1 are two different phone company 
services.  T1 is approximately 10 times faster; ISDN and T1 are both wired and 
programmed differently coming out of the wall jack, and equipment 
for these connections will not be interchangable.
(Waves hands to explain away T1/PRI.   :)  )
 
I pledge $50.


#10 of 203 by jared on Thu Jul 24 17:56:14 1997:

re #4 and #5
those have been adressed in the coop conf, please look in there.

As I pledged last night athe Bod meeting, I pedge $40


#11 of 203 by mary on Thu Jul 24 18:22:23 1997:

Actually, Jared, I just re-read item #10 here and most of
what creole asked has not been addressed.  I think I 
know the answers to those questions but maybe could
address them specifically.  Maybe in item #10 so as
not to drift this fundraising item into an merits-of
item.


#12 of 203 by steve on Thu Jul 24 18:37:18 1997:

   $40.


#13 of 203 by steve on Thu Jul 24 20:01:50 1997:

   Daniel, Dorian is a local person who has been involved
with the net for some time now.  I'm not sure of all the
places he has worked, but I know he's done things at CIC-net.

   As to why he's doing this, I think its fair to say that
he links the concept of Grex, and has the ability to help
us out.  There are people like this, who are willing to
assist others when they can.  They're rare, but they do
exist.

   If Dorian pulls the plug on this, we'd have to find a
commercial entity (most likely an ISP) who'd be willing to
offer us a net connection at a discount price.  Forunately,
there is already one in the wings, and the cost would be
about $130 a month.  The good news here is that ISDN
connections have gotten cheaper over time, such that if we
do need to jump to a commercial service its about certain
that it will cost less then, than now.  Also, the two
routers we'll have will be usable at some other place.

   Could he sniff traffic going to Grex?  Sure.  But he's
a professional and isn't going to do that.  Part of being
in the network world is the same "sacred trust" that
others have (like Grex staff), when working on machines.

   Grex has a most generous offer here.  Grex has gotten
offers similar to this before, going all the way back to
the Sun-2 system that Mike Bernson donated to us, to the
Sun-3's that General Dynamics gave us (pieces of which
we're using right now), to the neat things that we've
gotten over the years and turned into cash at various
JCC's.  Dorian's offer is in this tradition.


#14 of 203 by janc on Thu Jul 24 23:26:12 1997:

A real ISP might, maybe, just barely be within our reach if we could find one
to cut us a special deal.  We'd have to scramble hard every month to come up
with the monthly cost.  This deal is no big strain on our monthly costs.  The
up front cost is a bit higher, but the monthly cost is something we can pretty
easily handle.  We are poor.  We have to take what's cheap.  This deal may
not work for Grex forever, but it will work for a while, and the costs of
connectivity are only coming down.

Total pledges so far:
                         $240


#15 of 203 by aruba on Thu Jul 24 23:28:14 1997:

I, too, would like to know more about Dorian and why he's so well connected.
Can anyone tell us more than STeve did?  Jared?


#16 of 203 by aruba on Thu Jul 24 23:42:35 1997:

(I get $360, Jan.)


#17 of 203 by janc on Fri Jul 25 00:12:00 1997:

Hmm...on recount I see:

resp login    amount
====================
 1   janc      $50
 2   aruba     $40
 5   toking    $20
 6   tao       $20
 7   dang      $20
 9   krj       $50
10   jared     $40
12   steve     $40
====================
              $280

Did I overlook another $80 someplace?

I don't know much of anything about it, but some people who have lots of
connections in the internet business, and no children or other expensive
hobbies seem to collect bandwidth.  Dorian seems better connected than
some ISPs.  


#18 of 203 by giry on Fri Jul 25 01:05:50 1997:

I will toss in $20.00


#19 of 203 by i on Fri Jul 25 01:31:41 1997:

Beware any promised installation times from Ameritech.  My experience is
that they feel free to run many weeks late, but get responsive after a
complaint call to the Mich. Public Service Commission.


#20 of 203 by senna on Fri Jul 25 02:45:15 1997:

The delays we'll be recieving from Ameritech was one of the reasons it was
decided to go ahead and install the phone lines now, rather than later.  We
won't be able to install until after Dorian returns from vacation anyway, but
if we wait until then to order we'll be behind the 30,000 new students
requesting phone line installations.  


#21 of 203 by polygon on Fri Jul 25 03:15:37 1997:

I'm in for $30.


#22 of 203 by jared on Fri Jul 25 04:14:37 1997:

Since folks won't read the other item, here's the deal about the connection
1) It's not going away anytime soon, the soonest time it'd go away is when
dorian moves in about a year, and that will just be a line
move, and that's if he moves.

2) as for network security, dorian and I have full access to all your packets
already, grex's internet provider uses cicnet as their provider,
we both work there right now (as in this very second), so I could
if I had the time to waste go post everyones passwords, sure, so could mci,
so could any inbetween network provider?  I don't have the time, and the
time to bring up that discusson has long passed, so take your medication
and settle down.


#23 of 203 by srw on Fri Jul 25 05:17:24 1997:

I'll pledge $50.


#24 of 203 by steve on Fri Jul 25 05:19:11 1997:

   Heh...  Jared knows we know where he lives. ;-)

   All right, that last pledge gets us past the $300 mark.  Not
bad for 24 hours of begging...


#25 of 203 by steve on Fri Jul 25 05:30:14 1997:

   Ha!  Another pledge snuck in as I was typing #24.  $380, which
is almost half way there.


#26 of 203 by scg on Fri Jul 25 05:51:29 1997:

re 17:
        Jan, the $80 that you missed was from me and whoever the third person
who threw in $40 at the board meeting was (Misti?).


#27 of 203 by senna on Fri Jul 25 06:13:48 1997:

Not bad.  lets see if we can't get some pledges from people who normally
aren't bumming around cfs?


#28 of 203 by aruba on Fri Jul 25 06:33:55 1997:

Re #17,26:  Steve's right, you missed $40 from mta and $40 from scg.

Re #22:  Jared, there is a clear difference between packet-sniffing at your
job and packet-sniffing at home: one can get you fired, the other cannot.
In other words, if you or Dorian or some other employee of ICNET or
CICNET were to do something unethical using the resources of your employer,
we would have some recourse - we could tell your employer about it.  With
this new situation we are getting into, there is no such recourse.

I'm not in the least suggesting that I expect either of you to do anything
unethical.  I just don't think it was unreasonable to bring the matter up.

I still would like to know a little more about why Dorian is so well
connected.  Is there a good reason why the connection "won't be going away
any time soon"?


#29 of 203 by janc on Fri Jul 25 12:15:06 1997:

Oops, I thought that $120 raised at the board meeting was toward the phone
installation charges, but it makes more sense for them to be applied to the
ISDN modems.

OK, so we now have:

janc    $50
aruba   $40
toking  $20
tao     $20
dang    $20
krj     $50
steve   $40
giry    $20
polygon $30
srw     $50
mta     $40
scg     $40
================
       $460

Please, if you can't afford $20, feel free to donate $5 or whatever you can
afford.


#30 of 203 by bruin on Fri Jul 25 13:48:22 1997:

I'll pledge $10.00, and include it with the $6.00 I pay for monthly dues 
come August 1.


#31 of 203 by signet on Fri Jul 25 13:54:05 1997:

i pledge $20 and good luck. so far so good!


#32 of 203 by grexer on Fri Jul 25 14:25:31 1997:

Ok, I dont know how i got involved in this, but ethics suggest that since I
am a heavy user here I should chip in.  I will put $50 in the coffer .... 
Kshitish (Tish)


#33 of 203 by grexer on Fri Jul 25 14:27:24 1997:

Hey incidentally I think the questions being raised are quite valid..
its never too bad to be cautious in this world!!!
  -Tish


#34 of 203 by nt on Fri Jul 25 15:04:25 1997:

I got a mail from faster@cyberspace.org saying that I'm a heavier user
of GREX :( 

Are you sending mails to everyone or just heavy users :)

*singing* *ghar se nikhalthe he kuch dhoor chalthe he raste mein hai uska
ghar*

I pledge $100.


#35 of 203 by nt on Fri Jul 25 15:05:30 1997:

I'm trying to convince more Indians from party..well should see the luck :)


#36 of 203 by irvingp on Fri Jul 25 16:47:19 1997:

hell, *sighs*  ill throw in 20. do i get membership with that?


#37 of 203 by ungrez on Fri Jul 25 17:08:41 1997:

alright i pledge a 100 dollars...but tell me how to send it from india
i could send you a cheque for the amount in rupeees will that do..tell me 
all the best for the venture..:)


#38 of 203 by richard on Fri Jul 25 18:13:20 1997:

better send those rupees in cash...a foriegn check would be hard to
cash.  Wonder what the exchange rate for rupees/dollars is?


#39 of 203 by aruba on Fri Jul 25 18:30:49 1997:

Re #37,38:  Richard's right, Mikal, the bank tells me that a check in rupees
cannot be easily cashed.  nt has a method for getting money out of India -
Sri, can you help Mikal out?


#40 of 203 by jared on Fri Jul 25 19:19:10 1997:

re 28
        1) to say the least, neither of us are interested in grex at all,
if you're worried bout us sniffing, you need to worry about every other
backbone operator

        2) as for connected, dorians cicnet t1 is staying there, and he's
getting another t1 from digex, and possibly one from his next employer..
we're both addicted, and the connection will be able to be at either
my place or his, and you should get decent connectivity.

        If you run into problems, I can talk to a few folks on your behalf 
also here at iagnet.net, branch, icnet, etc.. and get you a deal from
them, or someone else.  It's not that much of a problem.

        and as for the passwords, that's why you should use ssh instead of 
telnet, check out http://www.ssh.fi/


#41 of 203 by senna on Fri Jul 25 19:34:47 1997:

Thanks for the large donations from ungrez and nt... thanks for doing the
legwork, nt.

I might have some money left over, but I won't be sure till I get my paycheck.


#42 of 203 by nt on Fri Jul 25 19:40:09 1997:

Richard, I think 1$ = 35.65 Rupees.
As Richard said if there is a way that GREX could convert Rupees into dollars
its fine "ungrez" can send the cash thru registered post.
Mark A Conger, Contact "State Bank of India" in NewYork.. I guess they will
take Indian rupees and will give you USD.
If nothing works then I will take care of this.


#43 of 203 by richard on Fri Jul 25 21:36:55 1997:

Of ocurse, if Grex is suddenly that much faster, 
word will get out and a *lot* more
people will come here for email and such and grex could get
swamped...thereby slowing things down again and defeating
the purpose of a faster connection.  It is just a question of
whether the benefits outweigh the drawbacks.  Is a faster
connection worrth increased demand for services like email?


#44 of 203 by mta on Fri Jul 25 21:50:42 1997:

I'm pretty sure I heard some staff talk about a way to deal with 
maintaining the speed of GREX while dealing with new mail demands.  
Something about putting mail on a separate machine so that mail can get 
swamped all by it's little lonesome and the rest of the system would be 
minimally effected.

How far off is that possibility, folks?


#45 of 203 by steve on Fri Jul 25 22:00:21 1997:

   Not that far--I need to enter an item in the Garage conference about
it.
   Back to the fund raiser...


#46 of 203 by headdoc on Fri Jul 25 22:30:14 1997:

I'm in for $20.


#47 of 203 by toking on Fri Jul 25 22:39:01 1997:

anyone got a tab on th total, so far? <just curious>


#48 of 203 by bjorn on Fri Jul 25 23:48:27 1997:

Because of finincial discrepancies which are entirely the bank's fault, I'm
not sure what I can pledge yet because I'd like to know what the Hel is going
on with my money.
(Norwest in Minnesota *not* Great Lakes here)


#49 of 203 by mta on Fri Jul 25 23:57:00 1997:

I'm in for another $20.  (I too though that I had donated to the phone 
lines so this was budgeted.) 


#50 of 203 by aruba on Sat Jul 26 05:40:29 1997:

We just hit $800, so this is an official fundraiser.  If you have pledged, 
please send your money to

Cyberspace Communications
P.O. Box 4432
Ann Arbor, MI 48106-4432

If you haven't pledged yet but are thinking about it, please don't let the
fact that we have reached $800 stop you.  The real total for setup costs will
be somewhere around $1350, and the less of that that has to come out of Grex's
current bank balance, the better.  Please keep the donations coming.


#51 of 203 by senna on Sat Jul 26 09:19:44 1997:

Indeed, keep them coming.  Thanks to everyone for their help.


#52 of 203 by glenda on Sat Jul 26 09:57:37 1997:

I'll kick in $40


#53 of 203 by scott on Sat Jul 26 11:06:19 1997:

I'll pledge $50.

(In one item Richard thinks Grex needs to be faster, then in this one it will
only cause trouble if Grex is faster.  (sigh))


#54 of 203 by fitz on Sat Jul 26 13:24:26 1997:

I've got $40, since my employer just paid me my my unused personal-leave days.
What a wonderful employer!  How could it have known?  


#55 of 203 by robh on Sat Jul 26 13:43:20 1997:

Re 53 - Perhaps this is an admission on richard's part that he
wants to make trouble for us.  >8)

Count me in for $20.


#56 of 203 by aruba on Sat Jul 26 17:42:39 1997:

Re #54:  Was that a pledge, fitz?


#57 of 203 by fitz on Sat Jul 26 20:25:51 1997:

More than a pledge, if the fund drive fails, I specified in my letter that
the check can be put into the general fund for indiscretionary spending.

The check is in the mail.  Really.  It is.  Live it up.  Buy some spare
electrons.  It's too late to stop it:  The USPS now has control.  Do not
adjust your mailbox.  Hahahaaaa.  You'll never stop me now, sleep
deprivation has taken over and I'm going on 32 hours non-stop.  


#58 of 203 by aruba on Sat Jul 26 20:38:24 1997:

Well, thanks fitz - and get some rest.  Thanks to everyone else, too.  Keep
the pledges coming!


#59 of 203 by janc on Mon Jul 28 14:10:21 1997:

Yes.  Thanks to all.

I sent e-mail to about 90 of the people who spent the most hours telnetted
into Grex in June.  Unfortunately, I screwed up the setup of the
"faster@cyberspace.org" address I asked them to respond to, and didn't fix
it while at Grexstock.  Oh well.  At least we reminded a few more people that
Grex does need donations.

I'm glad people haven't stopped donations at the $800 goal.  Sometimes some
of the pledges don't get fulfilled, and it is good to have some more margin.


#60 of 203 by valerie on Mon Jul 28 15:06:46 1997:

This response has been erased.



#61 of 203 by senna on Mon Jul 28 20:26:46 1997:

And I wasn't one of them?  Wow, I'm impressed with myself all of a sudden :)
Actually, I don't spend all that much time online.


#62 of 203 by aruba on Mon Jul 28 20:41:45 1997:

Please thank scg, mta, and aruba for handing their pledges to me in person,
and thank nt and irvingp for sending theirs through the mail.  Thanks!


#63 of 203 by valerie on Mon Jul 28 20:42:52 1997:

This response has been erased.



#64 of 203 by dpc on Mon Jul 28 21:07:21 1997:

I pledged (and sent) $50 earlier this year to buy the new 670.
So far, that hasn't gotten off the ground.  What guarantees do we 
have that this project won't just sit around for six months or so?


#65 of 203 by jared on Mon Jul 28 21:38:22 1997:

This is a much different item, david..  The dropping in of a router
on each end and the ordering of a phone line is all it takes, not 
playing with hardware and software for a bit to almost no end.


#66 of 203 by steve on Mon Jul 28 23:00:01 1997:

   Heh.  The 670 is a complex beast; from both a hardware, software
and security standpoint.  The ISDN line is going to be a couple
hour session where most of the Grex staff gets to watch as the
more knowledgable staff gets it working, and then hopefully gets
to do it over again for experience value.


#67 of 203 by tsty on Mon Jul 28 23:22:12 1997:

GREAT that we have reached the $800 threshold in pledges without banging
on the grex piggy bank. grex now *does* need to receive teh $$ pledged, so
please do not delay - the phone line has been ordered (based on cash$$ donated
at the board meeting)
  
also note, please, that the expected total initialization cost is ~$1200 with
$800 being the threshold for *action*.
  
we still need the additional $400.
  
I am in for $10.
  
<<dpc, different projects have different time lines and differnt problems, the
670 is being worked on, as the minutes of the last board show.  everyone is
munching on the bit for the 670 to become grex's evolution - and it will
happen.>>



#68 of 203 by aruba on Mon Jul 28 23:34:46 1997:

The actual estimated installation charges are

          $625  for an ISDN router on our end
          $625  for a router on the other end
           $42  for installation of an ISDN line on our end
           $42  for installation of an ISDN line on the other end
        ------
        $1,334  total

We currently have $960 in pledges.


#69 of 203 by remmers on Tue Jul 29 12:04:18 1997:

To bring it up to an even $1000, I'll pledge $40.


#70 of 203 by dpc on Tue Jul 29 13:14:25 1997:

Well, this is certainly a good idea; I just don't want to see it
sit around like the 670 - collecting dust and excuses.   8-)


#71 of 203 by danr on Wed Jul 30 17:31:48 1997:

I'll kick in $25.


#72 of 203 by aruba on Wed Jul 30 18:08:54 1997:

Please thank fitz for sending in his pledge.  Thanks!


#73 of 203 by valerie on Wed Jul 30 21:28:19 1997:

This response has been erased.



#74 of 203 by steve on Thu Jul 31 04:41:34 1997:

   I ordered the ISDN lines today--it took a little longer
than I thought it would to get to them, but its done now.
At this point I have the installation scheduled for 8/15.

   Unforunately, at the last board meeting where we
decided to go ahead with ISDN, I got the price for the
installation of the lines wrong.

   I said that they would cost $42 each.  That was incorrect.
The cost per line is $147, or $105 more per line, or $210
more for both.  Sigh.  I'm sorry for leading the board
astray on that one.  On the brister side, the monthly
charges are going to be right around $25.  I'll be getting
the exact prices a little later.


   Having said that, any few more dollars we can eek
out would be good to help cover the cost of this
connection... ;-)


#75 of 203 by tsty on Thu Jul 31 08:11:34 1997:

<ouch>


#76 of 203 by janc on Thu Jul 31 15:39:32 1997:

Hmmm...I think this higher installation cost is more than the board
authorized, but I don't think that should stop us.  The support from our users
has been good, so we can afford the higher cost.  Probably the board will
retroactively authorize the higher expenditure at the next meeting or
something like that.  It's not technically correct, and if anyone is bothered
by that, they should say so now, but I think we should proceed.


#77 of 203 by steve on Thu Jul 31 17:15:25 1997:

   I volunteer to be a pie target at the next meeting.  I only
ask to be able to specify what flavours are used.


#78 of 203 by dang on Thu Jul 31 17:34:00 1997:

Mud pies are nice for throwing.  Wouldn't recommend them for eating, tho. :)


#79 of 203 by valerie on Fri Aug 1 14:20:34 1997:

This response has been erased.



#80 of 203 by dang on Fri Aug 1 15:44:39 1997:

Me too.


#81 of 203 by scott on Fri Aug 1 16:00:53 1997:

Me too.


#82 of 203 by senna on Fri Aug 1 20:05:38 1997:

me three


#83 of 203 by dpc on Sat Aug 2 02:05:17 1997:

Me four.


#84 of 203 by polygon on Sat Aug 2 04:42:00 1997:

Definitely.


#85 of 203 by jared on Sat Aug 2 13:12:53 1997:

me 85
oh wait, that's the resp #
I gotta find an envelope and mail my stuff from bfe here, so
it should get there before I get back from vacation


#86 of 203 by arthurp on Sat Aug 2 14:52:41 1997:

Please do go for it.  :)


#87 of 203 by aruba on Sun Aug 3 05:58:51 1997:

Re #77:  Specify away, STeve.  :)


#88 of 203 by steve on Sun Aug 3 07:04:23 1997:

   Key Lime Pie.


#89 of 203 by aruba on Sun Aug 3 07:05:54 1997:

Okey Doke.


#90 of 203 by valerie on Sun Aug 3 22:46:26 1997:

This response has been erased.



#91 of 203 by aruba on Mon Aug 4 07:41:54 1997:

Your objection is noted and logged, but will have to be seconded and voted on
before it carries any weight.


#92 of 203 by scg on Mon Aug 4 08:14:43 1997:

Can we make the pie throwing a fund raiser?  $20 towards the line installation
allows you to throw a pie, or something like that? ;)


#93 of 203 by valerie on Mon Aug 4 13:28:36 1997:

This response has been erased.



#94 of 203 by steve on Mon Aug 4 15:52:07 1997:

   Make it $50/pie and I shall do the honorable thing for Grex.


#95 of 203 by valerie on Mon Aug 4 20:27:33 1997:

This response has been erased.



#96 of 203 by aruba on Mon Aug 4 21:32:51 1997:

Please thank headdoc, scott, giry, srw, bruin, and signet for sending in their
pledges.  Thanks!


#97 of 203 by i on Mon Aug 4 23:47:09 1997:

Obviously valerie doesn't appreciate just how good Key Lime Pie is.

Let's threaten her with warm dutch apple pie and just-starting-to-melt
vanilla ice cream.


#98 of 203 by mta on Tue Aug 5 00:02:37 1997:

(Maybe she has a=n aversion to the sticky mess pie throwing results in).


#99 of 203 by valerie on Tue Aug 5 04:46:17 1997:

This response has been erased.



#100 of 203 by tpryan on Tue Aug 5 23:58:48 1997:

        Nothing like good Florida Key Lime Pie made by Cheif Piere
Company in Traverse City, Michigan sold as a specialty item in a
Gerogia Kentucky Fried Chicken store.


#101 of 203 by aruba on Thu Aug 7 13:59:04 1997:

Please thank tao for sending in her pledge.  Thanks!
Our pledge total is $1025, and we have received $470 of that.


#102 of 203 by valerie on Sat Aug 9 00:10:31 1997:

This response has been erased.



#103 of 203 by orinoco on Sat Aug 9 15:57:20 1997:

I don't know about money, I might be able to pledge $10 or so.  Is there any
work connected with this that I might be able to help with?


#104 of 203 by steve on Sat Aug 9 17:39:22 1997:

   Likely not.  The largest amount of work will be at the remote end of
the connection, and some root type stuff here, chaning out IP address,
etc.   If you can spare $10, great.  If its $5 thats OK--every little
bit helps.  We truely appreciate all help.


#105 of 203 by aruba on Sat Aug 9 17:46:37 1997:

Please thank remmers and janc for giving me their pledge money.  Thanks!


#106 of 203 by remmers on Sat Aug 9 20:10:36 1997:

(I'll thank janc if janc will thank me.)


#107 of 203 by aruba on Sat Aug 9 20:58:04 1997:

Re #103:  orinoco, should I put you down for $10?


#108 of 203 by valerie on Sun Aug 10 03:29:17 1997:

This response has been erased.



#109 of 203 by janc on Mon Aug 11 14:54:01 1997:

Thanks John.  But all thanks to me should be multiplied by .8, since I
misremembered my pledge amount and paid 20% less than I pledged.  I'll
come up with the other $10 next time I see Mark.


#110 of 203 by orinoco on Mon Aug 11 17:13:15 1997:

Sure, aruba, $10 from me.


#111 of 203 by aruba on Mon Aug 11 21:41:36 1997:

Ok, that puts our total pledged at $1035, $550 of which we have received.


#112 of 203 by toking on Tue Aug 12 01:38:06 1997:

oops, I've been lazy for a while, and just got around to buying some stamps,
I'll be sending my pledge soon.

<it's too bad you don't have a form on the web page for a credit card>


#113 of 203 by aruba on Tue Aug 12 02:33:55 1997:

I'm afraid we don't have the means to accept credit cards.


#114 of 203 by toking on Tue Aug 12 03:25:24 1997:

as a matter of curiousity <and a slight drift> what would that take?


#115 of 203 by mcnally on Tue Aug 12 05:56:51 1997:

  An agreement with a local bank, credit-card processing equipment,
  staff time, etc..  Not to mention that VISA or Mastercard would
  get to skim a few percent off the top of every credit card donation..
  It'd probably be more cost effective from Grex's standpoint to send
  you a SASE..  }-)


#116 of 203 by aruba on Tue Aug 12 11:39:25 1997:

Right.  We have certainly tossed the idea around a number of times, but
haven't followed through on it.  I guess it's the percentage we have to pay
to a credit card company that really bothers me about it.


#117 of 203 by toking on Tue Aug 12 13:13:24 1997:

I hadn't realized <silly me> that the credit cvard companies charged
people to accept their cards....such a delusional thought, I was
thinking they were happy with the intrest they charged....


ok, thanks <i'm done drifting now>

I'm sending the check tonight


#118 of 203 by richard on Tue Aug 12 21:14:36 1997:

As long as Grex has money sitting in the bank, has it ever occured to 
buy a CD and earn some interest?  Grex could buy a $500 or $1,000 CD and 
make a few bucks more in interest than just having the money sitting in 
a bank account does.  And not like the CD couldnt be cashed in if there 
was a money crunch right?


#119 of 203 by aruba on Tue Aug 12 21:39:27 1997:

Hmmm...  No, can't say as I'd ever thought of that before.  I wonder what the
rates and penalties are these days?


#120 of 203 by richard on Tue Aug 12 22:00:46 1997:

Or could transfer a portion of Grex's funds into a money market 
account or something.  There are numerous ways to invest and make 
extra interest these days.  


#121 of 203 by valerie on Tue Aug 12 22:37:10 1997:

This response has been erased.



#122 of 203 by valerie on Tue Aug 12 22:38:01 1997:

This response has been erased.



#123 of 203 by i on Wed Aug 13 01:54:50 1997:

That doesn't sound right.  The Lions Club I'm in is a Michigan-chartered
business (needed for tax purposes for our concessions wagon, etc.) and is
currently earning interest on two C of D's (from bequests that the Club
got).  It's one of the "big name" banks and I know they've our corporate
ID numbers on file, so I doubt there's any error there.

I'd guess that the problem was with minimum balances, service fees, two
accounts being needed to get checking and interest, etc. so that it wasn't
worth doing.


#124 of 203 by scg on Wed Aug 13 04:08:17 1997:

I really don't want to see Grex hoarding money, either in the form of
investments or a large bank balance.  Sure we need to keep somewhat of a
cushion, but for the most part I think our users donate money so that we can
spend it on the system, rather than just hoarding it.  If our users want to
invest the money and donate it to us later, they can certainly do it.


#125 of 203 by tsty on Wed Aug 13 05:18:50 1997:

re #121. it didn't/doesn't have to, but hey, old news.


#126 of 203 by mcnally on Wed Aug 13 06:17:11 1997:

  re:  putting money in an interest-earning account -- how would that
  affect Grex's non-profit status and would the relatively miniscule
  amount of interest earned be worth the staff time used filling out
  whatever tax paperwork was needed?


#127 of 203 by valerie on Wed Aug 13 15:52:16 1997:

This response has been erased.



#128 of 203 by drew on Wed Aug 13 19:12:33 1997:

I saw an ad for a PCMCIA ISDN modem for around $400. On the general principal
that PCMCIA equipment tends to be more expensive than its desktop equivalent,
it should be possible to get the ISDN routers for much less than $650 apiece.
You might want to shop around.


#129 of 203 by steve on Wed Aug 13 21:05:26 1997:

   Good ones cost money.  There is a *vast* difference between an at-home
use of a piece of equipment, and commercial quality continuously used
equipment.  The ISDN routers we're looking at are the cheapest we dare
go with.


#130 of 203 by krj on Wed Aug 13 21:20:43 1997:

An ISDN "modem" is not the same as an ISDN router.


#131 of 203 by toking on Wed Aug 13 22:31:20 1997:

IWLTA <and no its not a lie> the checks in the mail


#132 of 203 by mdw on Wed Aug 13 22:39:25 1997:

A real "ISDN modem" is pretty rare.  It's a thing that will talk to
ordinary voice modems at the other end (via ISDN to the CO, then via an
ordinary analog voice line to the other end.)  The major win is that it
gets rid of one analog hop.  It's something an ISP might do, if ISDN
lines were cheaper than ordinary phone lines (they aren't) and if the
modems were cheaper (they aren't).  You can also use ISDN for ordinary
voice conversations, and there are a few special features you can get
that way that you can't get with an analog line.

Electrically, ISDN looks like this:

central office
        talks via U loop over 2-4 wires to
NT1
        talks via T bus over 4-8 wires to
NT2
        talks via S bus over 4-8 wires to
1 to 8 devices

In europe (and elsewhere) the phone company owns the NT1.  In the US
(only) the subscriber provides the NT1.  The T bus only supports 1
device, but the S bus supports up to 8 devices.  The S & T busses are
otherwise similar; you only need an NT2 if you have more than one device
to hook up to the line.  In the US, because the NT1 is something the
subscriber has to provide, it is common to find equipment that has this
built in.

ISDN comes in to flavors, BRI and PRI.  PRI provides 23 B channels plus
1 D channel (or 30+1 over E1, found in europe..).  BRI provides 2 B
channels plus 1 D channel.  A B channel is a 64K channel, or one "voice"
connection.  A D channel is a 16K channel, used for control purposes.
One common use for a PRI is for a PBX, or a private phone switch (such
as you might find in a small office).  PRI's are also commonly used by
ISP's.  BRI's are what you might find in a home.  There are several
different standards for the control signals sent over the D channel;
hence some equipment that works fine in europe would be difficult to get
working here in the US (and visa-versa).

Because a BRI provides 2 B channels, for data purposes, it's common to
use both at the same time to talk to the same remote site.  Various
incompatible protocols are available to do this, one is called
"bonding".

One ISDN data channel merely provides a 64K synchronous full-duplex bit
circuit.  It does not provide for packet handshaking, compression, or
anything else.  For internet access, it is common to run "PPP" over
ISDN.  Some older ISDN internet devices did not provide for packet
compression, but newer ISDN devices commonly do so.

There are indeed a lot of ISDN devices available for the PC compatible
world.  These devices commonly interface to the ISA, EISA, PCI, or
PCMCIA busses.  Of course, these devices need software, in order to
function.  Unfortunately, all of the vendors we've located for such
peripherals have fallen prey to market pressures, and *only* provide
software for Windows, Windows NT, Novell Netware and similar proprietary
environments.  The problem with these environments is that they (a) cost
more, and (b) are less flexible, and (c) are not necessarily robust
enough to operate reliably (7/24) in a relatively hostile environment
(potentially hostile users, saturated network connection, unattended
operation.) The software for most of these cards is of course assuming
"personal" use, which means they're going to contain features like
part-time use, and colorful glossy brochures, but aren't necessarily
going to contain features like reliable automatic error recovery (a
pop-up window may be "good enough"), or subnet routing (for machines
connected via ethernet to the PC).

Another sort of ISDN device that is not hard to find is something that
connects an ethernet to an ISDN line.  The Ascend pipeline is one such
product.  These aren't particular flexible either, but they have
acquired a reputation for reliable unattended operation, and are
relatively simple devices unlikely to malfunction.  For our purposes, we
want a device that includes the NT1 interface integrated, supports some
form of bonding and compression, and will support these features when
talking to whatever is at the other end.  Right now, that would be a
clone of the same device, but in the future, it's desirable to pick
something that would be likely to work with an ISP too.  Some older
pipelines would only route to a few devices on the local ethernet, and
not further, needless to say, that would not do at all for the
"internet" end of grex's internet connection.  That would also not do if
we find in the future that we need to implement a firewall, or have more
than a few devices on the local ethernet.

There are lots of other ISDN devices out there.  For instance, there are
ISDN devices that connect to an ordinary serial port (data rates may be
limited to the speed of the serial port), there are computers that talk
ISDN directly (some of the newer sun workstations come with an ISDN
interface), there are gobs of ISDN cards for all sorts of other busses
(including VME, like we have on the sun4 machines), and there are many
different routers that support ISDN (like what you'd find at an ISP).
Most of these devices are either a bunch more expensive, have limited
functionality, and/or would be a lot of work to get working on grex.

The next step up from ISDN is a T1 line.  T1 is slightly cheaper than
PRI, and offers slightly more data througput (it runs over the same
physical lines as PRI).  We located one vendor of T1 cards for the ISA
bus, that we (or I at least) really liked.  They provided a freebsd
driver for their card, which would make it almost a no brainer for us to
get this going.  It would be a really great deal *if* we could find
somebody willing to give grex T1 internet connectivity (if we provided
all the hardware), and we had about $3K startup + $250/mo monthly to
throw into the physical connection.


#133 of 203 by i on Wed Aug 13 22:44:26 1997:

Re:  #127
Ah.  Sounds like the answer is that interest may not be paid on a commer-
cial checking account.  Grex would have to maintain a seperate savings/C of
D/whatever account to earn interest.  The standard "account types & quick
descriptions" sheet I have from my bank shows several non-checking accounts
for businesses that earn interest.


#134 of 203 by scg on Wed Aug 13 22:49:51 1997:

Many ISPs are now using digital modems talking over PRIs or channelized T1
lines (kind of like a PRI, but without the signaling needed for ISDN data
connections) to talk to customers' analog modems, so that's pretty much the
ISDN modem concept Marcus was talking about in his first paragraph.  That's
the only configuration the new "56K" modems will function in.  One end of that
connection has to be digital.


#135 of 203 by toking on Thu Aug 14 00:41:29 1997:

re 132: ouch..my head hurts


#136 of 203 by mcnally on Thu Aug 14 04:46:05 1997:

  I think a T1 connection would be a substantial overreach for Grex..
  I don't think we have the hardware to support the users who would be
  needed to support such a thing on an ongoing basis.  The most common
  cause of death for systems such as Grex is over-expansion, not under-
  devlopment..


#137 of 203 by mdw on Thu Aug 14 07:03:16 1997:

The hardware per se is not a problem.  Even the current 4/260 would
benefit from a faster connection, and backtalk in particular would
benefit greatly.  A faster network connection would mean that the
bottleneck would be in the CPU & disk - resources we can incrementally
improve - rather than in the network.

To put it another way, if we could get a T1 "for free", there's
absolutely no real reason why we shouldn't go for it.  We have a perfect
technical example of this in operation - nether.net.  The only remaining
question would be if the increased network bandwidth would change the
character of the system.  Personally, I'm quite convinced it would not;
I've seen far too much evidence that the most important determining
factor of the "character" of the system is the people & traditions of
the people already on the system; I've seen this over and over again, on
grex, m-net, the well, chinet, and many other systems.

The real problem with T1 is the $ expense.  There are two components to
this.  The first are the capital and operational expenses of the link
itself.  They are not cheap, but they *are* very compatible to the
expenses of 10 phone lines, and certainly would support far more than 10
users.  Clearly, since we are already covering a very similar expense
for about 10 real phone lines, this is not out of line with grex's
current budget.  The second is the expense of connecting the line to the
*internet* - *that* covers (essentially), the cost of a slice of an ISP,
their connection to any other ISP, and eventually, some portion of the
internet backbone.  *That* cost, at commercial rates, is several times
the monthly cost of the raw T1 connection, and given grex's current
budget, would represent a considerable gamble, *at present* (to say the
least).

In the long run, I'm convinced that if grex remains viable, a T1 (or
equivalent) will happen.  Hopefully, grex won't become potbound, but
will become larger, evolving technology such as the web will push the
need for better connectivity, and the costs of connectivity have been
and should continue to drop.  When we first started grex, we knew that
"someday", if grex were to survive and remain viable, it would have to
get an internet connection; but there was no way we could afford it at
that point.  Now, I think most of us could not conceive of grex *not*
having an internet connection.  So, to me, the question is not "if", but
"when".  There have already been a few points where it almost looked
like grex might get a deal that would realize T1-like connectivity, but
various things out of our control kept getting in the way.  Hopefully,
someday, we'll find a deal that will realize better connectivity for
grex.  In the meantime, I think we should keep in mind that ISDN is not
the ultimate in network connectivity, but just another step that we're
finally able to make.


#138 of 203 by mcnally on Thu Aug 14 17:42:01 1997:

  I won't argue against the claim that Grex will eventually need
  (and be able to support) a T1, I'm just cautioning against the
  "if you build it, they will come" school of system expansion.
  Taking on large expenses in anticipation of a large influx of
  users that never wind up coming has killed many a small public-
  access system.


#139 of 203 by janc on Mon Aug 18 19:15:31 1997:

Thanks to toking for sending in his $20 pledge for the ISDN connection.

Also, thanks to janc for belatedly handing in the other 20% of his pledge that
he previously forgot about.  Some people can't be trusted with money.


#140 of 203 by signet on Tue Aug 19 12:53:48 1997:

janc: are you speaking in third person in case he doesn't figure out the
connection?


#141 of 203 by dpc on Wed Aug 20 15:46:51 1997:

What's the best guess on when we get the line?


#142 of 203 by valerie on Thu Aug 21 15:08:11 1997:

This response has been erased.



#143 of 203 by dpc on Thu Aug 21 21:23:21 1997:

Good show!


#144 of 203 by steve on Sun Aug 24 16:47:42 1997:

  I have a call into Ameritech on this, but I belive that both ends
have been installed.   The Ameritech person who did the Pumpkin end
of the install was told the wrong building, but had my pager number
and called for help.  That got straightened out quickly, thanks to
our wonderful Ameritech contact Ken Kiernan's putting my pager number
on all service work. ;-)



#145 of 203 by valerie on Sun Aug 24 23:41:11 1997:

This response has been erased.



#146 of 203 by steve on Mon Aug 25 01:28:15 1997:

   I have an order in, but it won't be shipped out 'till Monday--actually
I was too late for shipment then, but it also let me look and make sure
that no one else ordered them.  I see no evidence that anyone has.


#147 of 203 by valerie on Mon Aug 25 04:33:46 1997:

This response has been erased.



#148 of 203 by scg on Mon Aug 25 04:42:17 1997:

How are we doing on collected pledges so far?


#149 of 203 by awijaya on Mon Aug 25 14:02:44 1997:

Hello Valerie, I hear about CC/Credit card problem. I will ask my
financial connection in NY for waiver/reduced cost. Is this againt
IRS rule/law? Perhaps the annual payment can be derived from
overseas interest. What about minimum amount for each month/year (turnover)



#150 of 203 by krj on Wed Aug 27 04:36:49 1997:

The Check, as they say, Is In The Mail.


#151 of 203 by janc on Wed Aug 27 16:09:24 1997:

I'd like to thank Ken Josenhans (krj) for sending in a check for his $50
pledge (and $3 extra for the infamous Silly Hat Fund).

This means that of the $1035 pledged, we have now collected $630.

If you made a pledge, and haven't paid up yet, please do send in your money.
Or, if you can make the board meeting tonight, bring it there.


#152 of 203 by orinoco on Thu Aug 28 00:42:15 1997:

I don't have spare cash now, but I should soon.
And long live the Silly Hat Fund!


#153 of 203 by janc on Thu Aug 28 03:14:24 1997:

At tonight's board meeting I was handed a flurry of checks, including quite
a lot of ISDN donations.

Thanks to Larry Kestenbaum (polygon), Misti Tucker (mta), Jared Mauch (jared),
and Dan Romanchek (danr) for helping Grex speed up it's net connection.

We now have $715 of the $1035 that was pledged.


#154 of 203 by aruba on Fri Aug 29 16:28:30 1997:

Actually, Jan was so flustered at getting so much money that he underestimated
our good fortune.  We have now collected $745 of $1035.  If you're one of the
eight people who pledged money but haven't sent it in yet, do please send it.


#155 of 203 by tsty on Mon Sep 1 04:27:40 1997:

the check is in your mailbox... wednesday turned in to 'moving allllll day.'


#156 of 203 by aruba on Mon Sep 1 05:33:09 1997:

Please thank tsty for handing me his pledge.


#157 of 203 by tsty on Mon Sep 1 07:55:37 1997:

<<never before had i seen such a comfortable and spacious mailbox until
i handed aruba that check.>>


#158 of 203 by scg on Mon Sep 1 19:55:56 1997:

The wiring from the Pumpkin's phone room to the Pumpkin is now done.


#159 of 203 by valerie on Tue Sep 2 00:09:39 1997:

This response has been erased.



#160 of 203 by aruba on Tue Sep 2 00:59:26 1997:

Thanks Steve!


#161 of 203 by dang on Sun Sep 7 17:12:05 1997:

I *finally* sent in my check. (I hate checks, did you know that? :)


#162 of 203 by aruba on Mon Sep 8 05:48:47 1997:

Checks are your friends, Dan!


#163 of 203 by danr on Mon Sep 8 16:28:58 1997:

They're certainly Grex's friends....when properly made out and endorsed,
anyway. :)


#164 of 203 by jared on Tue Sep 9 17:49:08 1997:

<poke> <poke> I still need phone numbers for the other end


#165 of 203 by aruba on Tue Sep 9 22:27:42 1997:

Please thank dang for sending in his pledge.


#166 of 203 by mta on Tue Sep 9 22:48:20 1997:

Thanks, Dan!


#167 of 203 by dang on Tue Sep 9 23:51:04 1997:

You're welcome.  (They're so inconvenient when compared to my Checking
Visa...)


#168 of 203 by valerie on Wed Sep 10 15:21:44 1997:

This response has been erased.



#169 of 203 by aruba on Fri Sep 19 22:15:43 1997:

Please thank robh for sending in his pledge.  We have now received $795 of
$1035 pledged.


#170 of 203 by valerie on Sat Sep 20 19:20:24 1997:

This response has been erased.



#171 of 203 by aruba on Thu Oct 9 21:04:21 1997:

So... Can anyone give us an update on the ISDN status?  Last I heard we were
waiting for one last bit of wire to be laid, from Darien's apartment complex's
phone box to Darien's apartment, and we hoped that would be done by the end 
of September.  What's going on now?


#172 of 203 by dang on Thu Oct 9 21:25:42 1997:

The wire was layed, and it was discovered that Ameritech had messed up again,
so they are fixing that now.  It's supposedly a problem at the central office.


#173 of 203 by aruba on Thu Oct 9 21:27:31 1997:

Oh.  Could we have some more details on what went wrong?


#174 of 203 by steve on Thu Oct 9 21:47:28 1997:

   I believe the ISDN line itself isn't working completely correctly.  I
say this after hearing *three* companies in town who are bitching loudly
over installs that seemed ok at first, but then couldn't carry traffic
over them.


#175 of 203 by aruba on Thu Oct 9 21:51:53 1997:

Have you called Ken K. about this, STeve?  And is there another item where
the ISDN status is being discussed?


#176 of 203 by valerie on Fri Oct 10 02:34:33 1997:

This response has been erased.



#177 of 203 by aruba on Fri Oct 10 04:13:06 1997:

Thanks.


#178 of 203 by steve on Sat Oct 11 16:56:52 1997:

   If it doesn't get resolved very soon (if it hasn't already) I'll
breath some fire on Ken's direction, but it really is a repair department
issue.  Actually, its another one of our Ameritech-is-disfunctional
issues, of which we have many.


#179 of 203 by valerie on Sat Oct 11 22:27:29 1997:

This response has been erased.



#180 of 203 by i on Sat Oct 11 22:49:18 1997:

Griping to the Mich. Public Service Commission got my company a real,
working ISDN line very quickly after many weeks of hassles with Ameritech.


#181 of 203 by krj on Sun Oct 12 04:33:44 1997:

Would anyone like to describe "it doesn't work" in any more detail?


#182 of 203 by valerie on Mon Oct 13 02:39:01 1997:

This response has been erased.



#183 of 203 by valerie on Mon Oct 13 02:39:50 1997:

This response has been erased.



#184 of 203 by scg on Mon Oct 13 07:20:59 1997:

re 181:
        This is the first time I've been thinking about Grex's ISDN line while
I've had a P50 manual in front of me in a while.  I checked the manual, and
the indicator it gives for line status translates to "The line is not active
at this time, but is physically connected."

This should ideally be a repair issue, so dealing with repair is the right
thing to do on this, assuming that route goes anywhere.  Jared has been
dealing with Ameritech on it.  The last mail I saw from him said that
Ameritech was working on the problem.  From what I understand Jared is out
of the country until Wednesday, so I'm not sure how to get trouble ticket
numbers or status reports form him before then.


#185 of 203 by krj on Mon Oct 13 16:12:01 1997:

I'm probably nagging needlessly, especially with jared unavailable.
Is the line status indicator you cite above  a "cause code", or the 
blinkie light on the front?
 
From either P50, have you been able to make a loopback call, where your 
B1 number calls your B2 number?  If the loopback fails, what is 
cause code?
 
What software rev is in the P50s?
 
(Feel free to tell me to go away.  I probably know just enough to be 
dangerous here.)


#186 of 203 by steve on Mon Oct 13 18:58:20 1997:

No Ken, stay here.  That kind of suggestion is always helpful.  Very helpful.


#187 of 203 by valerie on Tue Oct 14 16:17:58 1997:

This response has been erased.



#188 of 203 by scg on Fri Oct 17 05:52:47 1997:

It just says "Error: call failed".  No cause code.  The Ascends give cause
codes for a lot of things, but for a lot of things they just have status
indicators, and X or . is the indicator that something isn't working.

Maybe it's sending more out via syslog.  I'll get it logging somewhere.


#189 of 203 by krj on Fri Oct 17 18:32:51 1997:

Steve:  to get the cause code or other ISDN diagnostics, go into Term Serv,
then use the command:   show isdn


#190 of 203 by valerie on Sat Oct 18 05:07:39 1997:

This response has been erased.



#191 of 203 by krj on Sat Oct 18 17:27:01 1997:

No, but I'm certainly willing to pitch in on the ISDN installation, 
since I've installed about a dozen P50s and a hundred other ISDN
connections.  Let's set up a work session when we can have 
Grex people with consoles at both ends of the connection.


#192 of 203 by krj on Sat Oct 18 17:45:44 1997:

Rattling off a few other things about ISDN:  The "cause codes"
I'm referring to above are the standard codes which the telco 
switch is to return to the device on every call termination or 
failure.  Most of them are decoded in the router manuals.
 
If the P50 is not getting a cause code back, that usually goes in 
tandem with an error message "TEI not assigned;"  TEI not assigned
means that either there is a physical discontinuity between the router
and the switch, or else the telco forgot to build the phone number into 
the switch.  But scg said the P50 had an indicator reporting that 
the physical link to the switch was OK.
 
How did we specify the ISDN line installation on the order?  
Did we specify "Intel Blue"?  I think that's what the manual says to 
order.  Also, did we order the switch type to be "National ISDN", and 
is that what the switch type is set to in the router?
"National ISDN-1" or "NI-1" is a "virtual" switch type; so the user 
isn't supposed to have to worry about if the equipment is connected
to an AT&T 5ESS switch or a DMS-100, or whatever else might be out there.
 
How are our lines orders, and our equipment set, with regards to 
Circuit Switched Data and Circuit Switched Voice?  (Any problems here 
should be revealed with the cause codes.)


#193 of 203 by jared on Sun Oct 19 02:36:51 1997:

Folks, ameritech fixed the line.
It appears to be up and running just fine


#194 of 203 by krj on Sun Oct 19 04:13:06 1997:

Hah, all my responses were unnecessary; all we had to do was fix 
a typo in the phone number.


#195 of 203 by senna on Sun Oct 19 05:42:14 1997:

What you need is someone who is technically sound, like Ken, and has no life,
like me.  That would be lethally effective at solving grex's problems.


#196 of 203 by scott on Sun Oct 19 14:03:29 1997:

Yeah, unfortuneately all our gurus have lives these days.


#197 of 203 by valerie on Sun Oct 19 16:48:34 1997:

This response has been erased.



#198 of 203 by orinoco on Sun Oct 19 20:14:37 1997:

woohoo!
I may just have to start telnetting in again...


#199 of 203 by remmers on Sun Oct 19 23:47:56 1997:

The speed is very refreshing indeed.


#200 of 203 by valerie on Mon Oct 20 02:41:42 1997:

This response has been erased.



#201 of 203 by orinoco on Mon Oct 20 16:38:07 1997:

It's still too frightening for me...


#202 of 203 by dang on Mon Oct 20 17:01:01 1997:

I'm actually telnetted on a weekday, and I get quite good character echo!
<dang faints>


#203 of 203 by srw on Tue Oct 21 03:58:16 1997:

Backtalk even responded quickly.


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: