Grex Coop10 Conference

Item 18: The future of the Intro conference

Entered by valerie on Sun Jul 20 02:33:06 1997:

valerie Jan  8 04:48:39 2004 Valerie Mates valerie Jan  8 04:4
49 responses total.

#1 of 49 by steve on Sun Jul 20 04:17:14 1997:

  I think probably the best thing for the intro conference might
be to make it a "voluntary" conference (ie making the default
agora once gain), and steer people towards it?


#2 of 49 by robh on Sun Jul 20 13:20:40 1997:

Last I heard, new users were asked which one they wanted, so
it's sorta voluntary now.

My idea for the Intro conference was that the f-w(s) would be
very aggresive about making sure that the items were active,
and items that became inactive would quickly be replaced.
Having an Intro conference with months-old items is no
improvement over the dozens of other confs with no activity,
and it's actually worse if we're billing this as "a sampler
of what Grex is really like".  Though it pains me to say it,
I'd rather see new users shoved into the chaos of Agora than
be put in a dead conference.


#3 of 49 by dang on Sun Jul 20 23:53:08 1997:

I blush to admit that I've still never actually read any of intro, except for
a little bit right at the begining.  That said, from what I've heard and seen,
it might be better to dump them back into agora.


#4 of 49 by valerie on Mon Jul 21 14:39:01 1997:

This response has been erased.



#5 of 49 by richard on Mon Jul 21 16:15:01 1997:

should dump new users into a conference menu which lists the
cconfs.  As I suggested in previous item, such a menu is more workable
if dead, dormant, repetitive subject matter and no/absent fw confs
are elimninated or merged by cfadmin.  I suggested cfadmin set aside
a 60 da period and have every fw submit a renewal request for their conf.
This will make it obvious which ones to kill and could help cfadmin
encourage mergers of others.


#6 of 49 by e4808mc on Mon Jul 21 16:44:22 1997:

I (surprise, surprise) totally disagree with richard.  While inactive/dead
conferences may not sound like an attraction to new users, in fact they were
facinating for me.  One can always enter a response, and usually, someone will
answer you back.  For many of those conferences, there are active lurkers who
keep them in .cflist and would be delighted to have some new people enter a
question/answer/retort.  


#7 of 49 by krj on Mon Jul 21 18:51:10 1997:

A conference menu which is presented to new users doesn't *have* to 
list dead or decaying conferences.  The menu could even have an 
entry call "The Graveyard" which would lead users like Catriona 
into the byways of cyberarchaeology.
 
Let me rephrase this a bit.  We should come up with a "consensus"
list of most-active-conferences and offer this as a recommended list
or menu to new users.  Doing this has no implications about any other
conferences.


#8 of 49 by dpc on Mon Jul 21 21:08:15 1997:

Thanx for taking off the wrapper, valerie!


#9 of 49 by richard on Mon Jul 21 22:28:54 1997:

#7...yeah, a default cflist could be drawn up of the four or five
most popular confs and instead of dumping folks into agora,  dump
them into a *preset* cflist that *starts* with Agora.  Make it 
clear that they can change the .cflist at any time.

\But what would be the default .cflist?

1. Agora
2. Arts
3. Sports
4. Cinema
5. Books

Agora plus four good confs that just about anyone would have interest
in...or myabe the four most popular could be in the default?

In this way every new user would see more than just agora...they'd
see several confs automatically.  This is worth trying.


#10 of 49 by dang on Tue Jul 22 00:50:26 1997:

I have to disagree with a preset list of cf's.  For example, of those 5, I
read Agora, and might be talked into reading Books.  I most likely will never
read any of the others.  If I had gotten that list as a representative of Grex
instead of finding out my own favorites, I might not be here today.


#11 of 49 by rcurl on Tue Jul 22 05:17:29 1997:

I agree. It would be better to create a simple to use presentation of
all the conferences from which the user is encouraged to create an initial
.cflist. For example, number all the cfs, and have the system request 
the user to make an initial choice of cfs by number.


#12 of 49 by valerie on Tue Jul 22 16:18:23 1997:

This response has been erased.



#13 of 49 by richard on Tue Jul 22 19:47:02 1997:

hmm..so what we're getting at is a menu screen that new users would see
giving them an umbered list of the most popular confs (numbered list) and
asking them to orprompting themto create a .cflist right off thebat?
might be worth a try..


#14 of 49 by krj on Tue Jul 22 20:26:49 1997:

Rane has my idea in #11: except that, by default, I would limit the 
conference options presented to new users to maybe 10-20 "healthy"
conferences, with a bottom option to "list all confs."


#15 of 49 by valerie on Tue Jul 22 22:31:09 1997:

This response has been erased.



#16 of 49 by richard on Wed Jul 23 14:34:20 1997:

But just dumping into agora didnt work, thats why Intro was
started.  going back to what didnt work wont work again.

Maybe the "other conferences on grex" agora item can be made into
a public file, so by typing !confs, they can or new users can get
the file where the other fair witnesses talk about their confs.  This way
it woulnt jus tbe stuck of in agora where it can be easily missed.


#17 of 49 by mta on Wed Jul 23 17:09:40 1997:

Dumping people into Agora, while a bit overwhelming, has worked both 
here and on many similar systems over the years.

I think the menu idea is a good one, though.  Is it feasible to have an 
option to see comments about a conference from the menu?  For instance:

Conference     Comments
Homme   ^h      <Alt h>  
Femme   ^f      <Alt f>
Cooks   ^c      <Alt c>
kids    ^k      <Alt k>

Where the control command puts you into the conference and the Alt 
command gives you a paragraph or two (as in the "other conferences" 
item) and maybe a number of new responses in the last 30 day or last 
date of a new response?

It seems like that would be very usable for new folks, but I don't know 
how feasible it is technically.


#18 of 49 by richard on Wed Jul 23 18:12:24 1997:

But dumping people into agora *hasn't* worked here...it doesnt
get many people into the other confs.  It is done like that
because it is theasiest option.  The menu option
is a better idea.


#19 of 49 by valerie on Wed Jul 23 20:30:06 1997:

This response has been erased.



#20 of 49 by robh on Wed Jul 23 21:29:21 1997:

Dumping people into Agora has always worked fine - for getting
more of the kind of people who like Agora.  >8)


#21 of 49 by mta on Wed Jul 23 21:33:47 1997:

Well, yes, that's true Rob.  Anyone likely to be easily overwhelmed 
would be frightened off by Agora, so we've selected for people with too 
much time on their hands.  <g>  (Who me?)

That's why I like the idea of trying the menu idea -- there are quieter 
conferences to start in and maybe a specialty conference is just the 
place to start new folks.  But only if they choose it, I think.


#22 of 49 by senna on Wed Jul 23 21:43:06 1997:

The other conferences, most of which haven't been restarted in a while, can
be equally overwhelming.  If someone is dropped into agora early in a season,
it's rather easy to get into.  It's hard to break into crowded conferences,
though, particularly if you don't know what items are dead and what items
still warrant responses.


#23 of 49 by remmers on Wed Jul 23 21:56:56 1997:

The beauty of conferencing, though, is that a new response can
bring a long-dormant item back from the dead. I've seem numerous
instances.


#24 of 49 by scg on Thu Jul 24 05:32:11 1997:

re 17:
        That exact implementation wouldn't work, for some boring technical
reasons I won't go into, but there are several very similar ways to do teh
same thing that would work quite well.  It's a good idea.


#25 of 49 by senna on Thu Jul 24 22:04:36 1997:

Indeed, #23, as many people just hit "read" in a certain conference. 
Everything new that shows up appears to them.


#26 of 49 by davel on Fri Jul 25 18:38:05 1997:

In fact, if they use a .cflist, they just say "next" and it skips the
conference if nothing is new.  But if there are interesting new postings,
they'll see them and respond.


#27 of 49 by scott on Sat Jul 26 11:00:29 1997:

What if Agora item 1 became the "other conferences" item?  Then we dump new
users into Agora, and even if they hate it they still see a list of active
conferencs.


#28 of 49 by valerie on Mon Jul 28 14:35:41 1997:

This response has been erased.



#29 of 49 by richard on Mon Jul 28 15:07:32 1997:

wouldnt it be confusing if item #1 wasnt the welcoming
item though?  I'd think it would be disorienting to go into
a conf and not see the firstitem describing the conf.


#30 of 49 by valerie on Mon Jul 28 20:41:47 1997:

This response has been erased.



#31 of 49 by senna on Tue Jul 29 01:09:16 1997:

Works for me.  Make sure that it's frozen soon, so that it's not too long to
be overwhelming


#32 of 49 by mary on Tue Jul 29 12:31:29 1997:

As long as one of the first responses a new and unknowing
reading would get to is one that explains how to interrupt
reading a thread and move to another response, item, or
conference, then it wouldn't be necessary to have
special items listed first which are frozen with a 
tightly controlled content thread.  

Valerie almost always enters just such a response.
I think some of what is being suggested here is well
intentioned but probably not necessary or even helpful
if we it means we start having drift police or more
frozen (moderated) items.


#33 of 49 by rtgreen on Tue Apr 28 05:34:52 1998:

As a new user, I'm still feeling my way around the conferences slowly.
It's true for me, that some of these are quite off-putting.  I've been a
Grex user for over a year, and a member for several months now, and today
is the first I've ventured into coop.  There just isn't enough time to
wade through the backlog of old response in a new conference.  Why aren't
dead items reaped?  Evan in the classified conference, where #0 claims
that items will be removed in ## days, I had to wade through _years_ of
old stuff.  Is there a form of the 'fixseen' command that will filter
everything before a given date?  I haven't found it, so I find myself
repeatedly doing 'q' then 'since mm/dd/yy' for every item.  Even backtalk,
where I can see a menu of the items in a conf, doesn't tell me which items
have recent activity.

  Some enhancements to bbs that would make it more inviting to at least
this new user:

1) open with a menu of available conferences, giving name & recent traffic
volume stats on one line, with option to join or read description.  If the
user has a .cflist, follow that first, then present the global menu...
Maybe sort the list by traffic volume, so that the lonely ones are on the
first page.

2) On the top of the editor panel, as the user is entering a new response,
place the title of the current item, and the reminder to stay on topic or
start a new item.

3) At the respond or pass? prompt, give an option to respond offline to
the submitter's mailbox.  This might reduce the volume of off-topic
chatter we have to page through.

4) At the OK: prompt after finishing reading a conference, give the option
to add this conference to one's .cflist


#34 of 49 by valerie on Tue Apr 28 13:42:39 1998:

This response has been erased.



#35 of 49 by janc on Tue Apr 28 14:20:19 1998:

Some of those idea may find their way into backtalk.


#36 of 49 by remmers on Tue Apr 28 15:19:38 1998:

I'm not sure how suggestion (3) in #33 would work in practice, since
an item usually has several contributors. At the "Respond or pass"
prompt, any one of them could conceivably be someone you'd want to
send mail related to the item. Note that you can always send mail to
anybody at the "Respond or pass" by typing "!mail <whoever>", so in
effect the mail feature is already there.

Hm, this seems to be the "future of the Intro conference" item. It
hasn't been active for a while. Did we reach a decision on this issue?
Is the Intro cf still an option as the default conference for newusers?
Is anybody maintaining the conference?


#37 of 49 by albaugh on Tue Apr 28 17:31:01 1998:

Of course, we all know that "read since mm/dd/yy" isn't Y2K compliant...  ;-)


#38 of 49 by other on Tue Apr 28 17:59:55 1998:

actually , you don't even need the bang (!) at the respond or pass prompt to
mail someone.


#39 of 49 by mdw on Tue Apr 28 20:15:12 1998:

Actually, "read since mm/dd/yy" is Y2K.  PicoSpan wraps dates more than
50 years in the past to the next century; hence "read since 5/1/20"
means everything entered after 2020.


#40 of 49 by dang on Wed Apr 29 00:50:39 1998:

So in 2041, we will start having things entered on grex wrap to 2091?


#41 of 49 by mta on Wed Apr 29 13:19:09 1998:

Gads!  Sounds like a serious problem to me!


#42 of 49 by janc on Wed Apr 29 14:10:09 1998:

No.  Through the end of 1999 references to dates like 1/5/41 will be wrapped
to 2041.  Then after the start of the year 2000 Marcus's wrap logic presumably
won't be used again for another 50 years.  Any reference to 1/5/41 will be
simply assumed to be in the current century, thus 2041.  In the year 2051
however, the wrap logic will come into its own again, and any references to
dates like 3/14/00 will be wrapped to mean the year 2100, not the year 2000.
At least that's the way I'd expect it to work from what Marcus said.

Backtalk's approach is a little different.  From the context of the usage,
Backtalk will interpret ambiguous dates as either past or future dates.  In
a "read since" context, the date should always be in the past, so any
ambiguous date is interpreted as the most recent possible date.  So "read
since Wednesday" means the begining of the day on the most recent Wednesday
and "read since 4/6/99" means since 1899, not 1999.


#43 of 49 by albaugh on Thu Apr 30 20:38:19 1998:

I happen to think that "fixed windowing" or other algorithms of mapping
2-digit years to 4-digit years and claiming to be "Y2K compliant" is BS.
It might be sufficient for a business's or application's needs, but it still
relies on assumptions that aren't needed with 4-digit dates.


#44 of 49 by scg on Fri May 1 03:37:16 1998:

Yes, but four digit dates, where they can be avoided, are really awful from
the user interface standpoint.  There's a balancing act there.


#45 of 49 by mdw on Fri May 1 20:03:15 1998:

Actually, Picospan's 50 year wrap formula is relative to the current
date.  So the only time it doesn't apply is dates such as 1950, 2050,
etc.  Even this is somewhat mythical since Unix dates are 32-bit
quantites--and it's even a bit worse since some versions of Unix,
including apparently this version of SunOS, think dates are signed, so
the bete noir date is Jan 18, 2038.  Try these commands in PicoSpan to
see what happens:
        date 1/7/48
        date 1/8/38
        date 0x 7fffffff
        date 0x 80000000
        date 7/1/48


#46 of 49 by valerie on Mon May 4 05:16:48 1998:

This response has been erased.



#47 of 49 by remmers on Mon May 4 10:50:25 1998:

Ah, thanks. I'd forgotten that change had been made.


#48 of 49 by tsty on Mon May 18 21:07:47 1998:

is it also true that newusers are automatically putin the bourne shell?
or is the shell option still the choice fo the user? 
  
at a newusers house, ctrl-z from  Ok: killed the session ....great
puzzlement for a while.
  
and then, to avoid 'surprises' will    chsh   work right ...including
adding a .cshrc file to the user's space?


#49 of 49 by janc on Tue May 19 14:52:38 1998:

Newuser offers a choice of shells.

Chsh sets up appropriate dot files for a user.


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: